Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zane Benefits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zane Benefits

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by WP:SPA, with primary function of WP:ADVERT and WP:PROMO. — Cirt (talk) 06:40, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 06:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:14, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:14, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:14, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete - This company is notable for 1 thing; it is probably not legal and won't last long. The notability from the 2 entries at NYT online is more of notoriety: the new company is selling product to poor black people in Detroit knowing its model is probably illegal (here and here. There is an editorial that appeared in the WSJ Blog where the owner refuted the claims saying he's doing God's work. The rest of the cites are either Marketing groups or don't mention this company at all. This article seems to hit all the things Wikipedia is Not. From this editor, it is highly concerning that it is such a promo article of a company that is a dodgy start-up.EBY (talk) 14:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 19:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for all the reasons listed by EBY and the fact that it fails WP:GNG pretty badly. Dea db eef 08:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.