Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhang Deli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdwtalk 03:03, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zhang Deli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats):(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability. WP: POV issues. Article seems to have been created and heavily edited by article subject. Reference search yields next to nothing. Massive link farm in Exhibition section leads me to believe this is a support page for articles linked to in that section. New Media Theorist (talk) 02:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I did spend twenty minutes trying to improve it, which is when I noticed all of the above issues. New Media Theorist (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:17, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 11:07, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete - It's possible that there are Chinese language sources about this person out there. Still, from the searching that I've done, it appears that they're just not really notable. I could be convinced otherwise, but I lean to just deleting the article. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.