Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sunset at Big Bend National Park
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2020 at 17:58:05 (UTC)
- Reason
- High-quality image of a high-profile National Park. Already assessed and meets the Quality Image guidelines.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Big Bend National Park
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
- Creator
- Steevven1
- Support as nominator – Steevven1 (Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery) 17:58, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Steevven1. I don't know if this is your first time here, but could you have a read of the criteria for FP. Many thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Charlesjsharp. Thanks for the comment. I've read the criteria. High quality, high res, among best images on WP, free license, encyclopedic value, no original research/facts, good description, not fake. Which one is problematic? Steevven1 (Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery) 22:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- The image is only used in a gallery. It's my guess that this is what Charles is talking about. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- And the quality problem. With ISO 2500 necessary for the time of day, the image is too grainy and has little clarity. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:57, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you for the feedback! I guess I missed the gallery part. I'll try again with another image I believe may meet the criteria. Steevven1 (Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery) 17:20, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- And the quality problem. With ISO 2500 necessary for the time of day, the image is too grainy and has little clarity. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:57, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- The image is only used in a gallery. It's my guess that this is what Charles is talking about. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Charlesjsharp. Thanks for the comment. I've read the criteria. High quality, high res, among best images on WP, free license, encyclopedic value, no original research/facts, good description, not fake. Which one is problematic? Steevven1 (Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery) 22:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per Charles. Nice comp., but looks hazy, perhaps due mainly to evening light conditions, and detail at full res. isn't great. – Sca (talk) 14:56, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 20:51, 25 March 2020 (UTC)