Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 26

< August 25	August 27 >

August 26

File:Allsaintssecbad.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 06:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, blurry. We have clearer photos at Commons:Category:Basilica of Our Lady of the Assumption, Secunderabad. Kelly ^hi! 09:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: We don't have much replacements. If this is kept, it should be moved to Commons. Reh man 23:33, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Whether anyone agrees with the deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons Image shows a portion of the building not shown in other Commons photographs AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 15:38, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anna Fegi Headshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep czar 22:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this photo requires OTRS evidence of permission. Kelly ^hi! 14:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kelly, I am the owner of the photo, along with my wife, Anna Fegi. That photo was taken with our personal camera in December 2012 in Cebu City, Philippines. That particular image is used for all public promotions from shows and appearances. Thanks! Adam Brown- Untdrum99 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.207.208.234 (talk) 14:39, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there any reason to doubt this ownership/copyright claim?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I see, but if @Untdrum99 is Adam Brown (music educator), I would advise him to send confirmation of his identity from an official email address to verify that the account is not impersonation. Relatedly, the photographer of the photos of Brown and Fegi appear to be taken by a third party (the photographer owns the copyright). If the photos were work for hire or if the photographer's copyright was transferred, definitely mention that in the photo's description. czar 22:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anything&whatever.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 27#File:Anything&whatever.jpg}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Us senate result 1974.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, superior version available: File:1974 Senate election map.svg FASTILY 01:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for reference and transfer to Commons. MB298 (talk) 23:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the SVG is better. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 15:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Us senate result 1972.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 24#File:Us_senate_result_1972.PNG}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Non-circular gear.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, superior version available: File:Non-circular gear.svg FASTILY 01:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Book of common prayer 1662.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 29#File:Book_of_common_prayer_1662.jpg}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maynemedical.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 12:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maynemedical.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Ophran Image, not used in wikipedia (talk) 03:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's used now on University of Queensland Mayne Medical School--Prisencolin (talk) 05:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Closer's comment - I've reopened this per a request by George Ho on my talk page. The image was de-orphaned, but was then re-orphaned with the claim that it lacked a license, which appears to be an incorrect assessment.— Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 01:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Move/Copy to Commons - If English Wikipedia can't hold the image any longer, Wikimedia Commons should. --George Ho (talk) 01:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Teemo lantern.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. There's no freedom of panorama in Taiwan for sculptures, at least not that we can accept. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 12:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does this lantern resemble the original character design enough to be considered a non-free derivative work? Prisencolin (talk) 05:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless. The lantern is copyrighted on its own. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 00:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gregory Winter in the Master's Garden at Trinity College by Aga Machaj .jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relist Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 3#File:Gregory_Winter_in_the_Master's_Garden_at_Trinity_College_by_Aga_Machaj_.jpg

File is a duplicate of Commons:File:Sir_Gregory_Winter.jpg. Each image credits a different author. The enwiki version credits Aga Machaj without an OTRS verification on the file page, while the Commons version credits c:User:ElspethLindsey as own work. The Commons version was uploaded first. The enwiki version was originally uploaded as non-free, and had the license tag changed to CC BY-SA 4.0 by the uploader AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 14:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have contacted both uploaders, there should be an email coming through to OTRS. Please ping me if any questions. Thanks. Thehelpfulone 15:09, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS permission now received. Thehelpfulone 22:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Menwithmonsters.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 29#File:Menwithmonsters.jpg}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NelsonPainting.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, and unlikely to be used in the future due to quality issues. In addition, this is likely a copyright violation as a derivative work. The image in the photograph is likely under copyright. ★ Bigr Tex 23:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Poor quality and a reproduction of a copyrighted work. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 15:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rucka Ali 2016.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Licensed under Standard YouTube license, see link. MB298 (talk) 23:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.