Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Spawn Man/Reviews
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete per request from user and creator of page. —Doug Bell talk 09:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Page is a blatant violation of WP:NOT a free webhost. Huge page, completely unrelated to the 'pedia itself. Survived MfD last year due to canvassing, which is covered under WP:CANVASS and WP:SPAM. This is not the sort of thing envisioned for a userpage. It is not A.) about the editor, and B. is not related to encyclopedic work. -Mask 
08:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Eh, delete the darn thing. ;) However, AKMast, I'd appreciate it if you didn't make accusations about WP:CANVASS and WP:SPAM & say that there were "violations of WP:CANVASS last time around". This is hurtful & unappreciated. I'm reasonable & needless remarks about things which happened a long time ago are not needed 9Hence the term needless...) Plus it's not that big lol compared to some subpages I've seen... Delete as it is in blatant violation of WP:NOT. Whoever made this page should be ashamed... ;) Spawn Man 08:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
