Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 5

< March 4	March 6 >

March 5

File:RaulGonzalez2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RaulGonzalez2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Cutout of a newspaper article. Unlikely that uploader owns the copyright to the newspaper. Mosmof (talk) 04:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Grendels mum or.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Kafziel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grendels mum or.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is from 1932, artist died in 1971. Would not fall under GNU NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 04:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ch-abdul-rahim.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ch-abdul-rahim.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Scan from a printed document, highly unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Fred the Oyster (talk) 11:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Boonmark.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boonmark.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This looks like an official portrait, highly unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Fred the Oyster (talk) 11:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fred, I got this message on unfree file from you... Question is how can I verify the source since the picture hasn't been published elsewhere other than Wikipedia. It was originally posted in the Thai Wikipedia article บุญมาก_ศิริเนาวกุล and subsequently here in the English version of the article.

Besides, it's not really an official portrait. Here in Thailand, those who've ever served the government in official capacities (specially those ordained with electoral roles) have this habit of dressing up in a "royal" fashion while being photographed :D

Thanks MiCRoSCoPiC^eaRthLinG (talk) 04:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Barry Stanton Johnny Rebb Rock On!.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barry Stanton Johnny Rebb Rock On!.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Album cover, although out of print has been licensed by the uploader as CC3.0 Fred the Oyster (talk) 11:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Satguru Bhuriwale.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Satguru Bhuriwale.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Low resolution scan/photo, small size looks like an obvious web trawl, unlikely to be the uploader's own work Fred the Oyster (talk) 11:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

his is my own work its not a copyright material or related to any organisatio or firm.Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.241.209.148 (talk) 12:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Barry Stanton Tribute.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barry Stanton Tribute.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Album cover, although out of print uploader has licensed it with a CC3.0. Fred the Oyster (talk) 11:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:File name.ext

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:File name.ext (delete | talk | history | logs).

reason 117.241.209.148 (talk) 12:13, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own work its not a copyright material or related to any organisatio or firm.Thanks

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SandorZifferselfportrait.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept, PD tag removed, renominated NRD. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SandorZifferselfportrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Artist died in 1962, well under the 70 years needed for it to be PD, right? Yekrats (talk) 14:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The license needs to be fixed and a FUR added. This image cannot be replaced as the author (self portrait) is deceased. — BQZip01 — ^talk 11:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SandorZiffer1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Kafziel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SandorZiffer1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Artist died in 1962, so it is still copyrighted. Yekrats (talk) 14:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nowake.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nowake.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is licensed as Public Domain, however this is impossible as it is a derivative of a copyrighted work (the sign) and the United States provides no freedom of panorama. <>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk) 18:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because of track record of uploader, the majority of whose images have been deleted for copyright concerns. We have two F9s: File:Ebert-and-wife.jpg and File:Spine2ks2.jpg. We have File:Eddie van halen.jpg, which was F5ed but which was uploaded as "public domain" evidently on the basis that it is a "Widely distributed Internet meme" (he tried to upload that again, later, as File:Eddie-awards.jpg, but it was speedily deleted as an F11). Though it was FFDed as unencyclopedic & orphaned, he uploaded what looks to have been a screen cap from this news broadcast (albeit higher quality) as File:My kitty.jpg with the edit summary "This is a picture of my kitten {{No rights reserved}}". File:Playalinda Beach Warning.jpg was F4ed, while two others were deleted for lack of source/copyright info: File:Spotted Seatrout.jpg and File:Needlefish.jpg. Meanwhile, currently up for deletion on commons, is his File:Saltwater catfish.jpg, a crop of this which he uploaded as {{PD-self}}. The only image still here is File:HMS Resolute.jpg, which is PD by virtue of its age. Leaving aside the derivative issue, we have no reason to believe that he ever took this photograph, which lacks metadata and is only 13kb. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sign is merely text and a single circle. {{PD-text}} applies in spades here. — BQZip01 — ^talk 11:18, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment But there is more visible in the picture than the (possibly PD) sign: the water way, the trees, the bird. Containing a PD sign wouldn't make the photo PD, would it? Cnilep (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Absolutely not. However, the reason for this image being here was that it was a derivative of a copyrighted sign. It isn't. Furthermore, tineye shows no results for said image: [1]. It certainly could be that he cropped a photo of his own and uploaded it. Given that there is no evidence to the contrary other than prior bad acts, I say Keep. — BQZip01 — ^talk 19:28, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - I think the prior bad acts, given their number, are ample evidence enough. So far, this user has yet to provide us with a picture that he seems to have actually taken himself. There are only two images that haven't been deleted yet, this one and File:Owen hippo.jpg, which is up for CSD and which he seems to have believed was public domain on the basis of the fact that "Image circulated over the internet ad-nausium". Given evidence of deliberate fraud in some of his uploads, his credibility really should be zero. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:53, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Novo-logo-mrv.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Novo-logo-mrv.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This image is virtually identical to the MRV logo shown, for example, here. An older file, File:MRVEngenharia.png, was deleted as unambiguous copyright violation. User:Edson Rosa says he created the logo and releases it to public domain. This would seem to be either WP:COI or copyvio. The former is not a concern for PUF, but the latter is. Cnilep (talk) 20:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Only letters and a triangle; relabel as {{pd-textlogo}} and {{trademark}}. — BQZip01 — ^talk 19:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TOTVS-logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TOTVS-logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

User:Edson Rosa says he created the image and releases it to public domain. However, this image is very similar to the logo used e.g. here. Compare Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 5#File:Novo-logo-mrv.jpg. Cnilep (talk) 21:02, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Image is copyrightable and not the uploader's. Not used on any article (if used, a FUR would be needed) — BQZip01 — ^talk 11:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Brmallsbrandlogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brmallsbrandlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

User:Edson Rosa says he created the image and releases it to public domain. However, this image is very similar to the logo used e.g. here. Compare Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 5#File:Novo-logo-mrv.jpg. Cnilep (talk) 21:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Apply a {{PD-textlogo}} and {{trademark}} and call it a day. — BQZip01 — ^talk 11:19, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image restored and fixed per User_talk:After_Midnight#Unexplained_deletions — BQZip01 — ^talk 17:57, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mecca road sign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mecca road sign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No reason given for use of this image from another website. No apparent permission for re-use. RolandR (talk) 21:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Copyrighted image with no use on WP. — BQZip01 — ^talk 11:22, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LogoMultipan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:LogoMultipan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

User:Edson Rosa says he created the image and releases it to public domain. However, this image is very similar to the logo used e.g. here. Compare Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 5#File:Novo-logo-mrv.jpg and other images uploaded by this user. Cnilep (talk) 22:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Delahoya1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Delahoya1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Uploader has attempted to give this image a CC 2.0 license claiming that this OTRS ticket gives permission. I checked the ticket with OTRS volunteer User:J Milburn. His reply can be seen here. The OTRS ticket gave permission for one image (a while ago) to be used on Wikipedia only. This means that the image is not compliant with a Commons license.

These images are also being used under the above OTRS ticket and as such are also in breach of copyright.

Plus many, many more as a search for that ticket number will demonstrate. Fred the Oyster (talk) 22:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Pretty black and white here. — BQZip01 — ^talk 11:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.