Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Radioinfoguy
Appearance
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk Filed: 01:40, 14 July 2008 (UTC) |
- Radioinfoguy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Clevelandmusic24 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: G
- Supporting evidence: Strong suspicion that these two accounts are one and the same person, based on similiarities in edited articles, same writing style, and same arguments over a recent AfD. Some diffs.. 1, 2.
*ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ADDED 7/31/08- 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
While certain edits may not appear to be from the same user, I am willing to stake my reputation on this request coming back in the affirmative. The accounts are editing similiar articles, the writing styles (both within the edits and the edit summaries) are nearly identical, etc. --Winger84 (talk) 01:40, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Additional information needed at a glance, it does not seem to have changed the outcome of the AfD, do you have any other example where these 2 accounts were used abusively? -- lucasbfr talk 13:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- I will provide further diffs when I have more than a couple minutes available, later today. I am at work now. Thanks. --Winger84 (talk) 16:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Until further evidence can be provided, this case is Delisted. Tiptoety talk 01:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted as more information has been provided. Tiptoety talk 17:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Confirmed - also the following:
- Englishliterature (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Joekleon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- - Alison ❤ 17:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Clerk note: Main account blocked for 31 hours, socks indef blocked. Tiptoety talk 17:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Alison could you check one more, PHDoctorate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), given its contrib history? Gwen Gale (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- PHDoctorate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Lemcup (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Wackypeedia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Hornhead (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- PametRivers (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- PametRiver (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- - Alison ❤ 23:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Clerk note: All accounts blocked and tagged, main accounts block extended to indef. Tiptoety talk 00:21, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Eh-oh! That last batch were Unrelated to the master account here, but are socking in their own right - Alison ❤ 07:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- I've retagged these as socks of User:PHDoctorate, unless something else turns up. Kevin (talk) 07:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- Eh-oh! That last batch were Unrelated to the master account here, but are socking in their own right - Alison ❤ 07:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Can you check the following as well:
- ClevelandRadioGuy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Thanks, D.M.N. (talk) 12:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Clerk note: This seems a bit unnecessary seeing as the account is already blocked, oh, and quack, quack, quack. Tiptoety talk 17:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Unnecessary - quaaaaack! - Alison ❤ 18:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.