Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2014/07

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2014

01 July 2014

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. BollyJeff | talk 02:19, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 1 week by DMacks — MusikAnimal talk 20:34, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: A newly created account (user:Zakoni) insists on changing population data in infobox. He also uses aggressive tone in talkpage. A 3 day semi protection may cool things down.Alexikoua (talk) 12:35, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by Future Perfect at Sunrise — MusikAnimal talk 17:10, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Repeated addition of copyvio content and BLP violations, particularly from what appears to be a fan of the subject. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Only two parties involved, so full protection is not needed. I'm also not seeing these BLP violations or blatant copyright violations. No attempt discuss content on talk page, user talk pages, or edit summaries. — MusikAnimal talk 16:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:Several recently created accounts have been vandalizing the article over the past couple of days.LM2000 (talk) 03:20, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 20:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: This page keeps getting IP vandalism. We have a user or users changing IP addresses and making nonconstructive changes to the page. Requesting 2 Week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users in order to push them off. Urda (talk) 21:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 15:57, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: as above, high level of vandalism from IPs and new accounts. Hairhorn (talk) 06:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by User:BrownHairedGirl. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done (It has. For the bot). Mike V • Talk 20:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Discospinster (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) tutterMouse (talk) 20:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Could we please get semi-protection on this article just for a few days. An IP keeps editing against the sources and has now started removing them. Hopefully if we lock it up for a short while they will get bored and move on. Betty Logan (talk) 00:52, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This page is the subject of a constant and long-running edit war with both sides making no attempt to come to consensus and repeatedly reverting each other with contested edits. It could really use being protected to make them come to the table and sort it out. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term IP edit warring over an inappropriate category seems to have had an uptick lately. McGeddon (talk) 18:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:27, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

full protection: High level of vandalism by a registered user including antisemitism and remarks about the person's mental health and military service on the biography of a living person. Jrwood08 (talk) 00:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. All edits by registered users in the past month appear to be constructive. Only a single IP involved in recent cases of vandalism. — MusikAnimal talk 14:48, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sock puppetry to remove speedy deletion tag. STATic message me! 00:21, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Article was deleted and salted by FreeRangeFrog. Mike V • Talk 16:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous users keep deleting section about Soviet losses. BZTMPS ★ · (talk? contribs?) 18:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unsourced additions daily. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 15:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:26, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Request temporary creation protection (blue lock). Repeated recreation of article after deletion discussion. -- dsprc [talk] 02:26, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by Diannaa. Mike V • Talk 15:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps reverting this page back to a version that grossly violated WP:MEDRS, as stated on the talkpage. Already requested that the IP read this policy prior to his/her latest revert. Several new IP users have edited this page in the past few days.Seppi333 (Insert 2¢ | Maintained) 11:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 15:48, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Text Gangsters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite full protection: Repeated creation of article about web game of no clear significance. —Largo Plazo (talk) 10:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected — MusikAnimal talk 15:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Maybe three weeks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:41, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Removed pending changes protection due to the relatively high edit count. — MusikAnimal talk 15:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of repeating text phrases have been added to the page of late. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 14:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and dubious unsourced changes by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 00:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 14:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting long-term full protection as a redirect due to persistent sock puppetry from one user (TekkenJinKazama) using sock accounts and IP addresses. Ravensfire (talk) 23:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 12:29, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Usual sock returning after protection lapsed. Ravensfire (talk) 23:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:30, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, putting false information into article and adding fan pages to get attention to their websites. Certain IP editors constantly put fan-made websites in the External Links section as a way to get more attention onto their sites and replacing official sites with fan sites. Due to the high traffic page of the Spyro series article, I suggest a constant semi-protection to prevent this kind of thing from happening again. -- Aura24 (talk) 18:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected temporarily by Smalljim — MusikAnimal talk 14:24, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Currently there are a series of IPs and SPAs who are trying to add the names of entertainers and their fans who like this food. MarnetteD|Talk 18:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Gogo Dodo. Mike V • Talk 07:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – History is filled with BLP violations disguised as improvements and edit wars. — Rhododendrites talk |  15:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 06:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Recreated twice, everytime deleted per different criteria. Another A7/G11/G12 creation may then warrant the page to be salted. — MusikAnimal talk 19:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

02 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 16:36, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one hundred and sixty eight hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:29, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Numerous IPs with either vandalism or unsourced edits. LRD NO (talk) 11:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of seventy two hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:21, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Increasing and persistent addition of unconsensous information. OscarFercho (talk) 02:16, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keeps changing section; three different IPs used already. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 11:30, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined; really not enough recent activity to justify protection, as far as I see it. Nyttend (talk) 13:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism on this account. Changes on filmography table by different users for different opinions. Unexplained removal of source content says spam ref while they are clearly not. Daan0001 (talk) 09:06, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined You've been edit-warring against several people. If you continue, we'll need to use Special:Block/Daan0001. Nyttend (talk) 12:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I will leave the page as it is. But keep an eye on all the source content been remove please. Daan0001 (talk) 16:13, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced episodes and airdates. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:16, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruptive editing by IP users. EdwardH (talk) 19:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism has been spotty over the past two weeks, however judging by the extended history of disruptive edits from IPs a one month semi seems warranted. — MusikAnimal talk 19:16, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There are many IP users vandalizing this article and arguing with each other and none are using reliable sources. I think a semi-protection on this page would be best.  — TheMadonnaMusicCN (talk, contribs) 22:33, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and warned confirmed users about edit warring. — MusikAnimal talk 17:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. Gh87 in the public computer (talk) 20:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:31, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection. The page was recently put under protection because of a perceived edit war between two users (self included). The reality was that this was over the continued inclusion of false and misleading information regarding the setting of the show. User:EvergreenFir and User:Fyvrael have insisted, inspite of cited info on the page from the creator of the series, that the show is set in New Jersey (the info cited says there is no particular setting). Protecting the page doesn't accomplish anything IMO. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 03:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protection was applied through the closure of this 3RR case (permalink). As I noted in the closure, the alternative would have been to block both parties. Each user is totally convinced that they are right and that the only edit warrior is their opponent. EdJohnston (talk) 04:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
EdJohnston thank you for your closure of the AN3 report. I'm fine with the outcome and, as you say, removing protection will likely not result in anything constructive. I said on the article's talk page that if ChrisP2K5 decides to continue the edit war after protection is removed, I will not revert and simply file an ANI or similar report. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:24, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
EdJohnston, please review your decision and consider the entirety of the argument. EvergreenFir keeps adding incorrect information to the page, I keep restoring the correct info. He claims to have proof but it's mostly OR, and the citation I made is from an interview that directly refutes his claim. It's not an edit war, it's a user engaging in disruptive editing. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 05:53, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Please follow the dispute resolution avenues.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:30, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – JackSebastian and Darkfrog have turned this page into their personal battleground. Open ANI case seems to be going nowhere. DonIago (talk) 12:47, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by me for a full week. Nyttend (talk) 13:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Grawp/Jarlaxle Artemis attack, see history. Stemoc (talk) 10:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:54, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Fallout WP:BEANS from http://ftw.usatoday.com/2014/07/tim-howard-wikipedia-united-states-secretary-of-defense. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 14:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Dravecky. Mike V • Talk 16:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting protection for short period of time after recent football game; Tim Howard manning the US's Department of Defense has been a recurring vandal theme in the last few hours that's gone viral on social media and is attracting attention. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 07:38, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Request withdrawn, Closedmouth took care of it as I posted this. Thanks Cloud. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 07:40, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Ϫ 08:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:, Persistant daily IP vandalism regarding the subject's birth date.--Asher196 (talk) 16:13, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. 125.26.0.0/18 range-blocked for a month. Favonian (talk) 10:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: slow moving editwar between IPs and registered editors. The Banner talk 09:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 14:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – And the Talk page too, to which an IP user just posted the contents that had been deleted from the main article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 10:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article page Done by Bbb23 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) a few hours before this request but talk page has only been created once and remains unprotected. tutterMouse (talk) 11:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent transfer speculation on this footballer. Player has not moved nor agreed terms with another club but various IPs have added in unsourced edits implying the player has been transferred. LRD NO (talk) 06:53, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kleargear (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent use of page as personal attack platform by various IPs (most likely socks). Related to this ANI notice against suspected sock at Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Severe_Uncivil_behavior_by_User:Stoxxman. Zhanzhao (talk) 02:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- Ϫ 07:54, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. FK Hajduk Kula page is in the last few weeks and months, often targeted by vandals. Especially vandals with those IP addresses 195.88.12.94 and 188.2.224.85 I don't know why they keep vandalising fk Hajduk Kula page, but it is obvious that editors and admins have to react. There is a similar problem on serbian wiki redaction, also with fk Hajduk Kula page https://sr.wikipedia.org/sr/%D0%A4%D0%9A_%D0%A5%D0%B0%D1%98%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BA_%D0%9A%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B0 , and serbian admins decided to protect the page. If we look up on history pages and see often content changes and erasing references, it is clear that admins and editors on english Wiki, have to rise up some sanctions.Ajdukovac (talk) 04:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP edits don't look like vandalism to me. This is a content dispute. Ϫ 07:50, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism and high amount of reverts. LongLiveMusic (talk) 08:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Yunshui (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) tutterMouse (talk) 08:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection (possibly indef): Persistent slow-mo edit warring against consensus from a Philippines-based IP. Page has been semi-protected several times (3 days, 2 weeks, 3 months), with the same editor returning each time after it's up. Ansh666 02:33, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ϫ 08:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. One editor who was arguing nonstop turned out to be a banned sockpuppet, User:Wholesomegood. We have new accounts and IP addresses with no edits outside this article, which keep trying to add in the same information as this person, and arguing the same case nonstop on the talk page. This has be going on for awhile now. Please just protect the page against new editors and IP addresses permanently, since blocking it for a month won't make any difference, the determined editor just keeps coming back again. Dream Focus 02:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's at least try a 1 month, since the page has never been protected in the past. -- Ϫ 08:23, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Album redirect is not the album of existence. Being used as a mean for a bypass of editing. True page of Finest Selection: The Greatest Hits, which as well is not a notable album. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. and already semiprotected till album release, this is a content dispute. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:12, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism--Šokac121 ℗ 20:56, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Vandalism seems to have died down. Retartist (talk) 02:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Retartist: The first step is to contact the protecting admin, SlimVirgin. Mike V • Talk 07:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 18:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 02:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, especially from 197.232.13.243 and 62.8.73.39. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 06:49, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The IPs can be blocked again if they pop up with vandalism. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:26, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism going back at least 3 months, for every 1 edit, 10 are vandalism. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 03:44, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., by Bongwarrior--Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done (for the bot) Mike V • Talk 02:30, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruption from IP user. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:09, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Since it's contained to mostly just one IP, I would encourage discussion with the user and warnings/blocks if it becomes too disruptive. Mike V • Talk 20:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. STATic message me! 18:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Speedy deletion request declined — MusikAnimal talk 19:29, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Page about WWe Battleground 2014 is incorrect. It should be unprotected so WWE fans can correct the mistakes on it. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Declined Please use the edit request template on the talk page. Mike V • Talk 20:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The draft Draft:Régie Malgache appears acceptable. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:56, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done It looks like the draft was deleted and salted by Spartaz as a violation of Russavia's block. I'd strike up a conversation with him in regards to this issue. Mike V • Talk 19:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WadeSimMiser (talk) 18:55, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ronhjones. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't know if it's a notable subject or not, but the article's history is dominated by one or more edit warriors intent to turn it into a redirect. Let's protect it first and then assess -- an redirect may be right in the end, who knows. — Rhododendrites talk |  15:18, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ronhjones. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding personal info to the article. — LeoFrank  Talk 07:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This FA has been protected many times before because of continuous disruptive IP edits, which are usually unsourced or badly reword well-written prose. Not a single constructive one in the past month. Request it for an extended duration. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:28, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

03 July 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IP addresses have been deleting the same piece of text. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:59, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by anonymous users. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 17:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs and new users keep adding blatant copyright violations taken from here as seen in this edit. SQGibbon (talk) 15:33, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:40, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent uncited changes based on speculation. TM 21:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:11, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection, persistent addition of unreferenced content. 117Avenue (talk) 03:14, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @117Avenue: From what I can tell the IP editor seems to be editing in good faith, and is trying to expand the article. I suggest that instead of simply removing everything, I suggest you try to educate them on our sourcing policies (since it looks like much of the information could be sourced). They probably don't know what a talk page is, but if you put a "refimprove" template on the article and left them explanatory notes in your edit summaries they'd probably see that and hopefully start adding references. ~Adjwilley (talk) 06:04, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Which IP? Over the course of the article various IPs have come and changed and/or added information. There's no way of knowing which user is correct. 117Avenue (talk) 06:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your concern, and it would be nice if they were citing sources. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that turning the article into a redirect is the best solution either, particularly since it survivied an AfD, which is why I'm reluctant to protect it right now. I'd say if an IP comes along and reverts you, slap another big {{refimprove}} at the top and make sure it stays there for a reasonable amount of time. Then if they still haven't added references, you'll have a better rationale for removing everything. That's just my advice, do as you see best. ~Adjwilley (talk) 06:34, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Indian Cricket Fans have lost their marbles owing to this .  NQ  talk 21:17, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Bongwarrior (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (6 weeks) tutterMouse (talk) 10:19, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As so often happens with upcoming albums by famous artists, this has been the target of a lot of unsourced speculation and plain old vandalism lately. Jinkinson talk to me 21:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject of BLPvios and vandalism from anons/newly-registered users, especially in response to the subject's recent detention over embezzlement charges. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:11, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected ~Adjwilley (talk) 06:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very high amount of vandalism, including BLP-issues and false statements. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected ~Adjwilley (talk) 06:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Promo campaign by IPs and registered user with the same name as the band they are pushing. Few days (max three) will be enough to spoil the fun. The Banner talk 01:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Gave it 2 days... I expect the registered user is actually the same person as the IP who created an account so they could create the article, after reading your edit summary about people in the list needing to have an article. (Not saying that this should be sent to SPI, as an IP creating their first account is not socking.) ~Adjwilley (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of uncited IP vandalism. One IP has repeatedly added negations into the article concerning the professionalism of the team, contrary to sourced material, in an effort to lessen the Aces versus the higher-level professional team in Houston, the Dash. CyMoahk2 (talk) 01:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User(s) blocked. due to single IP based vandalism. — JamesR (talk) 01:39, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent introduction of factual errors. � (talk) 16:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Have you brought this up with the user directly? kelapstick(bainuu) 20:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Requested protection earlier too, but was turned down. Faizan 14:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Same as before. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by IP addresses against consensus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:190.44.133.67_reported_by_User:MelbourneStar_.28Result:_.29. Alans1977 (talk) 11:38, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been page protected many times. The last six edits since the page protection ended have been reverted, mostly they were vandalism. There really is nothing to add to the page most of the time. Hoops gza (talk) 02:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: I would like to suggest that until the dispute on talk page about Menzel's version being a single is resolved the page receive a full protection until then so edit warring between editors will stop. Bumblebee9999 (talk) 21:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: /semi-protection - I reasoned with the admin who fully protected the article into August of this year, who cited the possibility of editors getting into the legal dispute in which Yank Barry was suing Wikipedia editors as the reason for protection; and refused to unprotect. This is a very dangerous precedent to set, where in the event of a legal dispute, the article is entirely blocked off from ALL editors except for administrators. The link that they cited was this. Not only was fully protection only briefly mentioned, it was dismissed almost outright. I propose unprotection/semi-protection due to there being no guideline/policy/against one of Wikipedia's pillars for full protection. If this is not solved here, I will be heading to WP:ANI. This is again a very nasty precedent to set and should have no place on Wikipedia; The third pillar states that editors are free to edit articles, and this is counterproductive to that. Tutelary (talk) 14:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I would suggest taking this to AN/I Tutelary, it belongs there more than RFPP as it is more than just a simple unprotection request. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:13, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target for vandals and IP's for the past two months. Miszatomic (Talk) 20:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extended history of disruption, with little downtime between previous periods of protection. — MusikAnimal talk 21:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect due to transfer rumours in the media that are unsubstantiated . JMHamo (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of seventy two hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring. (t) Josve05a (c) 05:26, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One of the concerned users has been blocked, and looks like disruptive activity has cooled down. Once instance of block evasion, if this persists semi-protection may then be needed. — MusikAnimal talk 19:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

04 July 2014

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mike V • Talk 15:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I didn't check the log to see who did it, but it was accidentally protected at a  Template editor level instead of full. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 14:51, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Mike V • Talk 14:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page needs to be semi-protected due to continuous vandalism by different IP users at [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8]. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 14:07, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 19:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Recent persistent vandalism on a WP:BLP; this article is always a WP:BLP target. Flyer22 (talk) 06:57, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Disruptive editing and WP:Edit warring has followed. Flyer22 (talk) 08:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Faizan 06:11, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. Bbb23 (talk) 21:53, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs speedy updating in light of today's developments - [9]. It was fully protected by User:GrahamColm, who has not edited for over two days and so has not responded to request. Request reduction to semi-protection, to enable non-admin editors to update. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 13:25, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP hopper keeps editing against the sources. At first refused to acknowledge the validity of the sources and when I added more started performing their own currency conversions etc. Refuses to participate in discussion on the talk page and discuss their problems with the sources. Semi-protection may at least force the issue on to the talk page. Betty Logan (talk) 18:25, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Short protection in the hopes that the IP hoping reverter moves along. Chillum 22:08, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. About 5 of 6 acts of vandalism in the last two days alone. Frequent vandalism in earlier months and years. Indeed, a look at the public logs for this article show that there have already had to be 16 (sixteen) temporary page protection measures put in place, which regrettably have not prevented the persistent vandalism. Other articles on high-profile tennis players such as Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer have had to be indefinitely semi-protected due to persistent vandalism and unfortunately, I now feel that the article on Andy Murray has to be indefinitely semi-protected as well, because it is clear from the history of the article, that temporary measures put in place have not resolved the long-term issues of BLP vandalism. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Let's hold off for a bit. The article does not have a high edit count (overall) and there are plenty of constructive edits being accepted by IPs and unregistered users. Safeguarding against BLP violations is what pending-changes protection is most commonly used for, and in my opinion it is doing it's job well. — MusikAnimal talk 14:38, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Slow moving edit war. An editor using a few related IPs, almost certainly the long indef-blocked SNIyer12, has been slowly and meticulously re-adding unnecessary content to schedule tables that has been reverted by multiple editors, often with requests to discuss on talk page. This user is notoriously unresponsive, however. Given that, and given his historical insistence on re-inserting over and over and over again until blocked, I'm left with the options of either (continuing to) engage in an a glacial edit war, or requesting the page be protected. Hopefully so that he will go to the talk page, but most likely just in the hopes that it will stop. I'd simply do it myself, but I'm obviously involved at this point. Resolute 23:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

05 July 2014

Semi-protection: See talk page. Article has a history of being problematic, and there is every indication, given the subject, that these problems will continue. 2607:FCC8:B000:2100:41D7:E02F:7E42:5BDB (talk) 16:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This is a very odd article, but there's been nothing done to it for around two weeks. If there's an ongoing dispute over it's contents (which there appears to be), you should seek alternative remedies. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:31, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anon who is IP-shifting has been removing referenced information and breaking editing guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:18, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This appears to be a case of two editors in a dispute over whether a Canadian series should be judged by American rating systems, rather than clear-cut vandalism. Both editors flouted the three-revert rule and I have warned both, though the activity ceased two days ago, so no blocks are required. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - previous related complaints Mosfetfaser (talk) 14:47, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. First, this is the wrong section (this is unprotection) and its a stretch to jump from a couple weeks to indef. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:30, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A professional wrestler was "awarded" the Hero of the Russian Federation as Kayfabe . IP and unconfirmed editors keep adding him as a recipient, perpetrating a hoax. EricSerge (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:09, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Amazing World of Gumball

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 2 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. Recent page protection for articles related to the children's TV show The Amazing World of Gumball expired, but vandalism continues. Originally, an IP hopping user (66.87.80.57 / 66.87.80.0 / 66.87.83.2) was adding unsourced British airdates for this series across numerous articles. Within one day of the protection expiring, an IPv6 user started submitting comprehensive numerical vandalism, for example these three consecutive edits, here and in these three consecutive edits. I will be submitting duplicate reports for the affected articles. Thank you, . Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:31, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Each semi'd for a fortnight. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - The page almost done and with different elements and design and will be more new CSS costume that i will made, activities like undo, deleting, revert not truthful its just playing games with legel statements,

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still being vandalized after recent PP expired. EricSerge (talk) 19:39, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. by another admin. Also, Wrong section. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:35, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looking at the diffs there have been a lot of reverts because of vandal like edits. A2 15:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 15:34, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ishdarian 10:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'll leave it to the SPI clerks, they'll protect if they think it's warranted. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:05, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Edit wars on chart history. Common changes to Billboard Pop Songs chart almost every time. This must stop until the song goes in Top 20 of the chart, as the website contains only the top 20 of the chart. Nahnah4 | Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! | No Editcountitis! 07:12, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Good faith edits generally. Besides, it looks like it's #25 with a bullet ;) Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:55, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – When the protection was removed a new wave of vandalism. Hafspajen (talk) 14:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IPs (geolocating to Taiwan) and new users repeatedly making edits contrary to MOS (primarily increasing size of images and flags in infobox, changes that might look good on a 2560px wide display but are almost unviewable on smaller displays...) without engaging in discussion. Thomas.W talk 12:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done PC1 for 2 weeks. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:10, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ishdarian 11:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:24.106.242.82 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – block evasion as evidenced in the latest threats to editors on the project now reverted. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 08:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully things will have settled down then. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:01, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:47, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Salted for 1 year. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:38, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ···Vanischenu (mc/talk) 02:47, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent addition of unreliable information from IP addresses, with them either not citing any reference, or a reference that does not support their claims. livelikemusic my talk page! 18:05, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. For an article which was created two weeks ago, indefinite semi-protection is over the top.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:45, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Besides the vandalism I have observed, the semi-protection of this biographical article will eliminate unwarranted edits especially by unregistered users. Eruditescholar (talk) 20:39, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 01:53, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent reverts. Two editors are at wholesale 3RR reverts. – S. Rich (talk) 18:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC) 20:11, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Since it's currently between two users, I'd prefer to use blocks over protection. I've issued both users a warning and encourage them both to participate on the article talk page. If things escalate, I'd be glad to take a second look. Mike V • Talk 20:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the problem is between one user and virtually all of the dozen others. This has been going on for a month or two. It's true that in the past 24 hours one of the majority lost his cool and went 3RR but that's not typical of his behavior nor is the problem limited to just a single bilateral interaction. I endorse Srich32977's request and suggest you give this at least a trial period of PP to stimulate talk page resolution. SPECIFICO talk 23:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring, IP users constantly adding fan pages to get attention to their websites. Certain IP editors repeatedly put fan-made websites in the External Links section as a way to get more attention/views onto their sites and replacing official websites with fan sites. The IP users have discussed with the other users of not adding fansites on wikipedia on the Spyro talk page, but they disregard the 'Links that should be avoided' policy and continue adding the fansite external links in anyway. The Spyro series page was already blocked this week to all users besides admin, but right afterwards the IP users returned and added fansite external links again. This will no doubt create another edit war caused by the IP users that started the latest one. -- Aura24 (talk) 18:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 02:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: the URL being added was added to the blacklist yesterday due to repeated abuse on multiple articles ongoing for well over a year. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Currently there are two single purpose IPs who are engaging in low level edit warring and who are reluctant to engage the other editor on the talk page. I assume that the two IPs are the same person, but I could be wrong. In one recent instance there was some discussion and one IP did participate to a limited degree. However, after two uninvolved editors gave a third opinion but the consensus that emerged was ignored by the IP. I think a temporary semi-protection will force the IP(s) to engage at the talk page more thoroughly and/or create an account and thereby become more accountable for their editing. This will help to move forward discussion, collaboration and give the IP's time to get educated on WP guidelines and procedures. — Keithbob • Talk • 17:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: a third opinion is not a consensus, but in any case, the history linked to does not show the IP ignoring the third opinion -- the IP has edited the article but has left the agreed-upon text in place. I intend to offer some help to take the article forward, but am busy in RL and may not be able to do much before the weekend. I am not convinced that the IP is the only one pushing a POV here. Please would the admin dealing with this take note of these things when deciding whether to semi-protect. --Stfg (talk) 10:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Please look at the pattern of editing on the page and talk page since the very specific point of the NRC request. When points of contention have arisen, I have consistently tried to bring this to the talk page and had these please for discussion ignored. I think the semi-protection will go a long way in helping the IPs to engage on the talk page rather than just reverting edits and ignoring substantive points of discussion. Thanks for your time and consideration. --Pengortm (talk) 12:52, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please be aware of WP:SEMI where it states (under Guidance for administrators) that semi-protection should not be used to "to privilege registered users over unregistered users in (valid) content disputes". This is a valid content dispute. The basis of this request is the claim that the IP is editing against consensus. I don't believe s/he has done so. If s/he does so in future, we can then request semi-protection. --Stfg (talk) 09:38, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think the "Unregistered editors should be making very few quality contributions" criteria in WP:ROUGH might be applicable here. While on the surface the IP edits may seem ok, in most cases I have looked at they are simply incorrect citations of sources or personal opinions. Trying to engage on the talk page and via edit labels has not been productive with the article unprotected. --Pengortm (talk) 14:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No IPs have edited the article since 30 June. Please re-report if problem resumes. Diannaa (talk) 01:58, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and bad edits by unregistered IPs. Here are some examples of their editing which damage the correctness of the data in this article:[10][11][12]If you dont put protection of this article then not registered editors continue to harm. Hanibal911 (talk) 11:14, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 01:55, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ip socks and account socks of L'Aquotique hammering the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 02:11, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced content. XXX8906 (talk) 20:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 02:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Massive addition of unsourced material made by IP's and new users. Backendgaming (talk) 06:43, 4 July 2014 (UTC). Backendgaming (talk) 06:43, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 02:20, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been target of IP and socks for continuous false information addition and introduction of deliberate factual errors. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 18:42, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 02:27, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. Peoples be trolling my userpage and I doesn't like it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Diannaa (talk) 01:50, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Diannaa (talk) 01:47, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent IP-vandalism (over years, so far as I can tell) HGilbert (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 01:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Today is Independence Day. Google Doodle is featuring this song. This will be a highly visible page today. I request for semi-protection for 48 hours or however length that may be appropriate. Mr. Guye (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Vast majority of edits are constructive. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 19:41, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a certain IP address that keeps undoing edits on this page. It has turned into an edit war. His IP is blocked however something tells me that he changes his IP address and to come back and revert his own edits again. A2 16:25, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Zzuuzz. Diannaa (talk) 01:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP hit with vandalism over the last few hours from multiple users, and has seen nothing but vandalism over the last couple of weeks from a variety of editors (some of which has stayed for extended periods of time). ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 06:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Ponyo. Diannaa (talk) 01:24, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:04, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 19:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of recent IP vandalism to change the subject's nationality, despite a conversation to reach a consensus being raised on the talkpage. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 11:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There is just one IP engaged in edit-warring, and several other IPs who edited recently in good faith. I am seriously disappointed that nobody before me left any messages on the talk page of this static IP, not even after the fourth revert, but instead continued reverting them.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be more disappointed that the IP is ignoring all the advice on the talkpage. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:11, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been target of IP and socks for continuous removal of sourced content. Tanbircdq (talk) 21:40, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 19:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

06 July 2014

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Steelbeard1 (talk) 16:41, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jinkinson talk to me 13:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mike V • Talk 15:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A sock of blocked user has been adding sales given on the artist's label's website, which obviously is inflated. . Ryoga (talk) 12:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 16:30, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 09:48, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism very infrequent, but with the long history and severity of BLP violations and given the low edit count, pending changes protection is warranted. — MusikAnimal talk 18:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: An anonymous IP keeps adding a link containing commercial info (hotels, restaurants) ignoring the advice to insert it to wikivoyage, and pretending that it belongs to wikipedia since there are "useful phone numbers". I explained him the situation on its talk page but he did not reply, reverting again. Alex2006 (talk) 06:26, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AIV may be a more appropriate venue, in the future. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:41, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 06:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:37, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection As with 117Avenue's request below on XD, persistent additions of unreferenced information and continual WP:IDHT from IP's refusing to take any notices of such seriously. Nate • (chatter) 03:06, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:36, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous addition of original research, disruptive edits, and more. Show is extremely popular so it attracts a mess to clean up by IPs. – Recollected • 01:48, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:35, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection persistent addition of unreferenced information. 117Avenue (talk) 23:59, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:30, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing fancruft along with unsourced/poorly sourced additions. Last block was one month. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 22:39, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:33, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible article and as usual UFC events get vandalized. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 00:29, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ... discospinster talk 03:30, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of government claims made by anonymous IP. Backendgaming (talk) 21:39, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 22:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Ongoing edit war. Two editors have violated 3RR (it's not vandalism) so may need to be dealt with too. Number 57 20:58, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I'm going to hold off for now. The IP was blocked for harassment by Panyd, I blocked Walter Gorlitz for edit warring, and also gave a warning to Calidum. My hope is that these blocks/notices should suffice, but if things resume I'd welcome full protection. I've watchlisted the page and will keep an eye on the situation. Mike V • Talk 21:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To stem a recent flood of IP vandalism, where a rangeblock has been ineffective. Previous protection by Zzuuzz already expired. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No predjudice against reprotecting if more than one IP vandalizes it, however that is all we have now. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:26, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous addition of WP:NPOV violating terms and legacy extensions. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 05:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This isn't vandalism, and I don't think it's bad enough to require protection. I'll leave this for another admin to take another look. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And tame to boot as Xymmax mentioned. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I reverted copy-paste page move (from Russia Today (disambiguation)) and nominated page for RfD, but another user constantly reverts my edits, damaging visibility of RfD discussion. Please revert to "redirect with RfD notice" state and apply full protection for at least a day.

P.S.: same thing happens with the other related page – Russia Today (disambiguation), although I am unsure whether PP is needed there. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 09:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I reverted you twice. It was not a cut-and-past, but I agree that the move was based on the old version of Russia Today (disambiguation). I only reverted to the last consensus version, and I explained why on the talkpage. Please, finish the discussion instead of requesting page protection, and see Help:Disambiguation for correct use of disambiguation pages. Erlbaeko (talk) 11:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There never was any consensus about this version. You alone ever argued for it. Anyway, while there is an ongoing RfD discussion, this page must be a redirect. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 11:51, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I replaced an unprotected rediredt several days ago with a disambiguation article, witch is perfectly ok, according to WP:RFD. Citation: If you just want to replace an unprotected redirect with an article, you do not need to list it here. Turning redirects into articles is wholly encouraged. Be bold. Two other editors have also been involved to reach this version. (See my talkpage User_talk:Erlbaeko#Prods_of_redirects, and the page history.) You then changed it to a redirect and nominated it for RFD. And then you request a page protection instead of discuss the matter? Erlbaeko (talk) 12:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted and nominated specifically to discuss this matter, given that (1) the act itself is questionable and (2) even if DAB would reside there, some action (histmerge or speedy deletion and move) has to be taken. Note, RfD itself is discussion, which results into wider consensus. Anyway, now that there is ongoing RfD discussion where we both participate, this name should really be a redirect, and Russia Today (disambiguation) should be DAB (sync it to your vision of appropriate DAB for the subject), which could be moved to Russia Today if discussion result would be "disambiguate". — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 20:31, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, This is not the correct venue to discuss the merits of a redirect. that is RfD, which is where this is taking place. Erlbaeko, quit turning a redirect at discussion into a DAB page or you will be blocked for disruptive editing. Carry on the discussion at RfD, that is why we have it. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The previous editions of the page had been plagiarized from IMDB, but otherwise the individual in question clearly meets notability standards. I'd also like to see an admin reinstate text from the last edition of this page: Madison lintz--Prisencolinensinainciusol (talk) 22:52, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you talk to the protecting admin?--Ymblanter (talk) 06:45, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Discuss with the protecting admin first. Mike V • Talk 15:36, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A further note Prisencolinensinainciusol, I would usually suggest that someone requesting unprotection draft an article (preferable in Articles for Creation space) prior to unprotecting. Also the previous version doesn't really have enough to warrant restoration. --kelapstick(bainuu) 20:33, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

07 July 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly vandalized by a bunch of IP's adding junk. JayJayWhat did I do? 20:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 20:33, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP persistently removing cited content, has reverted four times now. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and/or non-constructive edits from non-registered users. G&CP (talk) 14:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:51, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated edits from multiple ip editors changing infobox pictures and adding unconfirmed reports of his deth. Amortias (T)(C) 18:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. StringTheory11 (t • c) 19:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has had frequent vandalism recently. . SkaterLife (talk) 13:50, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Widr (talk) 13:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yunshui 雲水 13:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: unilateral text removal by ip 178.164.179.114. PersecutedUser (talk) 10:58, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:12, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seriously needs protection, IP user (the same one but under different IP routers) continuously adding unsourced, libelous and WP:PEACOCK words on a daily basis to the article. I think 2 weeks of protection should ward off the disrupting IP. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 05:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not sure where the libelous is, but disruptive none the less. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:36, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, promotional edits, and just weird edits in general. Go and check it out and consider protection. Tutelary (talk) 02:37, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:37, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. XXX8906 (talk) 01:01, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Wholesale deletion of material by new user and various IPs. Which may be socks, as the edit summary 'false information' is being used by most of them. In any case, some protection for a few days seems in order. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 23:57, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One editor is/will be autoconfirmed soon, keep an eye and report to AIV if necessary. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:41, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Please see the history of the article and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oglesruins. Over the past month, Oglesruins's sockpuppets, specifically Aspentone and Stackskin, have persistently moved the article unilaterally and without explaining their reasons. Both of said sockpuppets are now blocked indefinitely; however, today a user called Jeetssnapss performed exactly the same page move and edits as Aspentone and Stackskin did in the past. I am therefore requesting move protection as there is a significant probability that this page-move vandalism will continue. --OneEuropeanHeart (talk) 21:36, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced edits from multiple IPs following transfer rumours about this footballer. LRD NO (talk) 09:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ·addshore· talk to me! 10:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:28, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Lord Roem (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (10 days) tutterMouse (talk) 06:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of newbie, IP, and sock vandalism. This article is under ArbCom's Discretionary Sanctions due to its extremely controversial nature (evolution/creationism controversies). Creationists continually vandalize, delete properly sourced content, and add unsourced editorializing. -- Brangifer (talk) 21:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., should be sufficiet to stop the current vandalism wave--Ymblanter (talk) 07:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Lazar Marković (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism (again). Fixed4u (talk) 23:40, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The talk page hasn't received an edit in 3 months. As for the article the only vandalism so far has been from one IP, which has been blocked for 24 hours. If it keeps up feel free to re-list. Mike V • Talk 01:03, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by new users and IP editors to a BLP. STATic message me! 22:31, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 01:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian soccer league articles

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.Two of the pages are on the Wikipedia Romania(Cupa Confederațiilor FIFA 2009 and Liga I 2014-2015). Am descălecat și aici . SHV 20:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

As mentioned, the two redlinks are on ro.wiki, not much if anything we can do here and 2014–15 Cupa Ligii isn't seeing enough action for protection. tutterMouse (talk) 20:48, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Per TutterMouse. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This page just came out of protection, but the same group of IPs has returned to make a mockery of the article. They've also started personal attacks in edit summaries, which is not appreciated. RGloucester — ☎ 16:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by Mike V. No need for semi-protection with a single IP causing the disruption. Report to AIV if the user continues after the block expires. — MusikAnimal talk 18:39, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An editor has been using multiple IP addresses to vandalize the article (90.222.117.102, 92.40.249.110, 92.40.249.202, Le contrôle de la qualité), since 5 July 2014. Edit summaries and contribution history give off a strong impression, along with his use of British English pejoratives with either IP (90.222.117.102 → "Sod off, son", 92.40.249.110 → "bollocks". Dan56 (talk) 12:05, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly oppose above request, after receiving an unfounded accusation of using multiple IPs. Two of those listed above (92.40.249.110 & 92.40.249.202) are clearly the same user on a rotating mobile IP, not a vandal. I suppose it's possible that Le contrôle de la qualité, a newcomer to the project, may be using a mobile device away from his regular workstation without being aware of any breach; I regularly edit via an occasionally-rotating home IP and am completely independent of anyone else working on this article. Dan56 appears to have a massive problem with the enormous critical acclaim and hyperbole for the album being balanced with a mere handful of negative reviews (of which there were previously none). WP:ALBUMS encourages balance, does it not? EDIT: "Sod off" is a "pejorative", eh? More like a response to an unfounded accusation. 90.222.117.102 (talk) 12:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Not vandalism as far as I can tell. Meanwhile an attempt has been made to discuss the matter on the talk page. — MusikAnimal talk 18:24, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible article. NickSt (talk) 23:26, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will the World Cup be over by then? kelapstick(bainuu) 20:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

08 July 2014

Semi Vandals adding vandalism to the page. -- Scorpion0422 18:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandals gonna vandle... kelapstick(bainuu) 18:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced/poorly sourced additions. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 14:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:56, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced edits by multiple IPs after recent short PP expired. Request for one month's protection since the new season would near its start in mid-August and things should settle down by then. LRD NO (talk) 13:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:52, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism, dubious unsourced additions and POV pushing by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 16:58, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Would reconsider if it picks up again today. kelapstick(bainuu) 10:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Kelapstick: The IP editor is continuing to disruptively edit without consensus on the article talk page for their change and just is using their own original research for their changes. STATic message me! 16:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs. A rangeblock would also work, as it seems that all of the bad edits are from one person. Piguy101 (talk) 15:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A range block would have been better, but I'm to positive how to determine the range. Keep an eye out for more from the same range if possible. -- John Reaves 15:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi protection:

Persistent vandalism. I counted up over 10 acts of vandalism in two days alone on 5 July 2014 and 6 July 2014. Frequent vandalism in earlier months and years. Indeed, a look at the public logs for this article show that there have already had to be around 15 (fifteen) temporary page protection measures put in place, which regrettably have not prevented the persistent vandalism. Other articles on high-profile tennis players such as Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer have had to be indefinitely semi-protected due to persistent vandalism and unfortunately, I now feel that the article on Novak Djokovic has to be indefinitely semi-protected as well, because it is clear from the history of the article, that temporary measures put in place have not resolved the long-term issues of BLP vandalism. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 15:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let us try pending changes, they are preferrabe if there are both constructive and destructive edits of new users.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This article has been deleted for two years. Probably the best way is to block non-administrators from reverting this page to what it was: a waste of space. George Ho (talk) 08:13, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. one edit in ten months? kelapstick(bainuu) 11:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism — requesting 3-month protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. A dozen of these (seemingly all from a single student making similar disruptive edits and evading blocks) are persistently vandalizing the B-class article, to the extent that almost every edit in 2014 has been either introducing his vandalism or reverting it. A 3-month period would keep the article semi-protected into the school year that resumes in September. —Patrug (talk) 07:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:07, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User Carniolus has repeatedly reverted User Matt 20123 to redirect the page to the point of edit warring. Protect the page so Matt 20123 or any other user won't recreate the page again. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's been five days since the last edit. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Renewed IP vandalism. RGloucester — ☎ 16:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 10:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring and changing sourced text from the same IP hopper as Puncture Wounds. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:56, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's and registered users vandalize the article by changing his club/birth date/name or similar. Kante4 (talk) 11:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warring by block-edvading IP hopper. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In addition, NinjaRobotPirate wins the internet, for his username. :) kelapstick(bainuu) 11:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a constant low-volume vandalism from a specific IP. Rentzepopoulos (talk) 10:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 96 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AIV may be a more appropriate venue if it is a single IP, however. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: frequent unsourced edits.LM2000 (talk) 07:13, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:07, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent (since 4 July) surge of new-user vandalism. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 05:11, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:05, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Occasional but persistent vandalism. NeilN talk to me 22:19, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by an anon IP hopper. More then likely are socks of User: MariaJaydHicky who has made the exact same change to this page in the past. STATic message me! 18:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:33, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Old content dispute has erupted again. Sam Sing! 16:55, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:35, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of 'fanboyism' that leads to unnecessary information in the intro, many edit reverts (once again linked to fanboyism) and mainly based on opinion and not fact. This eventually leads to vandalism and is usually done by non-registered users. Long-term. G&CP (talk) 14:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 1 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. IPs and new accounts keep adding unsourced future airdates in spite of numerous warnings, and contravening WP:CRYSTAL. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:29, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Various non-constructive edits ranging from unsourced, messing with height/weight, copyright infringement, and vandalism.LM2000 (talk) 03:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:29, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Similar vandalism by various IP addresses. . Magnolia677 (talk) 02:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple accounts vandalising faster than I (and Cluebot) can revert. Amortias (T)(C) 23:09, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Accounts do not appear autoconfirmed, so semi should do. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 24 hour protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. IPs have been on a campaign to add vanity vandalism to this article. See these 10 edits. My guess is that a quick response and 24 hour protection will dissuade the disruption. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:35, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent full protection: This module implements the highly visible Template:Episode list and Template:Episode list/sublist templates, both of which had full protection prior to the coversion. moluɐɯ 19:42, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. The two templates are template-protected, not fully protected, and that seems the logical protection level for the module too. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple accounts vandalising page - same users as per Jason Cundy. Amortias (T)(C) 23:33, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:43, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent full protection: Australia Day is the most important national holiday for Australians. Other countries holidays like American Independence Day are strongly protected. It is at constant risk of being vandalized.--WARNER one (talk) 20:29, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 20:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 18:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. StringTheory11 (t • c) 19:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

09 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Footballer is the subject of intense transfer speculation over recent weeks. Currently experiencing persistent unsourced edits by multiple IPs. Previous one week PP was insufficient and edits by various IPs continued after the PP expiry. Request for another week's PP as player status should be resolved by then. LRD NO (talk) 14:01, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring/POV pushing regarding the succession of this man as Da'i al-Mutlaq (religious leader). The related page Mufaddal Saifuddin is protected for pretty much the same reason. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editnotices

Unprotection: Currently all such pages can only be created or edited by administrators, account creators, and template editors. No longer needs to protect this seperately. GZWDer (talk) 16:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per the instructions above, you should have asked the protecting admin first. I've left a note for User:Amalthea to see if he would support unprotection. EdJohnston (talk) 17:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's best to leave these fully protected (and perhaps adding them to WP:Cascade-protected items as well) given any changes would have a massive impact on people's experiences of Wikipedia and there is a high potential for abuse (whether accidental or not). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:22, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Per Callanecc, and due to the lack of any obvious benefit from the unprotection. EdJohnston (talk) 15:56, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced libellous material.  NQ  talk 11:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:49, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been regularly vandalised over the last 9 months since I found it in a bad vandalised state and fixed it up. Looking back over the history way over 90% of edits are vandalism (or reverts), and most by anonymous editors. Suggest indefinite block on anon editing. . KylieTastic (talk) 08:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An anonymous editor, 167.7.188.66, continues to revert and delete legitimate, cited information that could be construed as unfavorable to the subject of the article. JaneOlds (talk) 03:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous additions of original research, disruptive edits, and all that. Article has been protected for short amounts of time in recent weeks, so clearly a longer protection is due. – Recollected • 00:22, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:43, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism; especially by User:Aathies. Mophedd (talk) 21:37, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:41, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple ip acounts adding unsourced claims after repeated reverts. Amortias (T)(C) 21:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:34, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current event, final is played 13 July. QED237 (talk) 16:27, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- John Reaves 16:34, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wave of multi-user vandalism. Falcon8765 (TALK) 21:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. StringTheory11 (t • c) 21:41, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Userpage of blocked sockpuppet, {{sockpuppet}} template persistently being removed by anonymous users. appears to be IP-hopping. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:06, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Featured article with a high level of IP reversions (various addresses in the 2602:306:c40c:e640:x range, see history). Persistent disruption contributed to a recent 30-day full-protection which just expired, but the IP seems to be back. This edit summary I think sums up the IP users mindset. --Netoholic @ 21:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, only one edit since unprotection, rest are autoconfirmed so semiprotecion has no effect. If the registered editors don't start playing nice, full protection may be warranted. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:27, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Aathies (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request user talk page protection. Blocked User Aathies is just using it to further his vandalism. Mophedd (talk) 05:51, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two edits to request unblocking is not abuse of the talk page. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:05, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Various non-constructive edits ranging from unsourced, messing the page, User: Xenophrenic and AnomieBOT and unknown users with IPs:31.45.16.21 and 67.87.50.54 have repeatedly added nonreferenced texts. User LibDutch and Mezigue have repeatedly reverted each other. Another friend has corrected them , Please semiprotect this page. Please remove this part: "but independent of the Iranian government in its management". Also please remove this part: "IRIB is independent of the Iranian government, but is said to be close to the country's conservative political faction, especially the elite revolutionary guards." Thanks Azirann (talk)Azirann

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There's been no IP edits since 12 June. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:03, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow motion edit war to promotional version. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This has a pretty steady stream of vandalism going back months. Other major elements such as Hydrogen and Helium are semi-protected, but I feel PC should be more than fine here. . ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 02:35, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 10:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page is currently target of persistent vandalism by IPs and SPA accounts, eg. [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] (more checking the page history). Also take a look at [19] "i have too many ip addresses, and i shall continue to destry (sic) user cavarrone's page, you can not do anuthing (sic)". Cavarrone 11:57, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. You didn't provide a length Cavarrone, so I made it indefiniate, if you thing a shorter period is better, just let me know on my talk page and I will do it for you. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism, unsourced changes and disruptive editing by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 05:54, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 11:07, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 00:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 10:51, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by new users (probable sockpuppets). STATic message me! 00:06, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Plus I've blocked the two accounts. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and disruption of the mentioned article. I would suggest protecting the page for a week or so until the player has completed his transfer. Shokatz (talk) 10:31, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 10:49, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ethanhawke (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Unprotection: Please either unprotect this page or increase its protection to full at your discretion as WP:PINKLOCK may only be used on high-risk templates and modules, and possibly in rarer cases where pages in other namespaces become transcluded to a very high degree, of which this user page is not. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 19:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done I'm guessing this was a missclick so I've increased it to full protection, FYI Beetstra. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:01, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, not a missclick, it was a misunderstanding in what was going on (someone managed to transclude the user-talkpage into a page which got fully protected with cascading protection going on, which disabled template-editing on a lower level). I mistakenly tried to lower the level on this page, before figuring out what was going on. Then I forgot to de-protect this. Not sure if protection is actually needed, but it doesn't hurt either. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've unprotected, we can remove talk page access if need be. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:28, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's changing his current club although no deal/agreement was made. Kante4 (talk) 20:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To allow TE's. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To allow TE's. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:51, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – To allow TE's. Mlpearc (open channel) 00:05, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If precedent helps: {{PD-self}}  • {{PD-author}} Mlpearc (open channel) 04:25, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

was full protected because of disruptive editing, when really it was a dispute over whether or not this school was notable. We've established that it's not, and this indefinite full protection is irrelevant in the first place. We'd discussed the issue on the talk page, so reinstating the content with third-party sources was not disruptive editing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmag32 (talk • contribs)

Bmag32, per the instructions above, you need to discuss this with the protecting administrator first ((DangerousPanda). --kelapstick(bainuu) 17:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have discussed it with them, a lot. On their TP, mine, and the article's. We've deemed it unnotable, and this was not disruption.Bmag32 (talk) 17:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And what was the response to the question "Will you unprotect the page Cleveland Middle School (Tennessee)?" --kelapstick(bainuu) 17:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • This was indeed disruption as the editor above twice reverted valid redirections that were according to policy. As they showed no signs of stopping, and continues to argue ad nauseum that the school is notable (in their opinion, not Wikipedia's) then full-protect was a valid alternative to a block for disruptive editing. As the chances of this wholly non-notable middle school ever meeting Wikipedia's notability standards are infinitely low, indefinite protection is not painful for anyone the panda ₯’ 19:14, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected No compelling reason for unprotection given, contrary, a compelling reason for maintaining protection has been presented.kelapstick(bainuu) 20:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this school is not notable, so there's no reason to indefinitely full protect if no one's going to recreate it. I had misunderstood the notability guidelines of WP:SCHOOL, and so I thought it might be notable because of high significance which I showed with a third party source. I understand now. How is trying to ascertain notability with third party sources diruptive? This shouldn't be indefinitely full protected if it's not notable.Bmag32 (talk) 20:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No reason to keep the protection but no reason to drop it either.If you felt it was notable, you could have made a userspace draft or instead started it at Articles for Creation as you would have got help then or at least informed that it was non-notable sooner. tutterMouse (talk) 21:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Please either unprotect this page or increase its protection to full at your discretion as WP:PINKLOCK may only be used on high-risk templates and modules, and possibly in rarer cases where pages in other namespaces become transcluded to a very high degree, of which this user page is not. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 19:05, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you speak with Callanecc about it? He is the admin who protected it and it is in his userspace. tutterMouse (talk) 22:01, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's not bureaucracy though, it's asking the person who protected it and whose userspace it resides in to consider policy (which is extra bureaucracy) and lower/raise as necessary, more a request from editor to editor. Besides, any admin would still want to consult with Callanecc regarding a page in their userspace and they'd ask it of you first too as a matter of courtesy towards that protecting admin and to avoid that extra bureaucracy you mention as talking to people about their actions isn't generally considered bureaucratic. Anyway, Callanecc has been pinged so I'd personally hope he'd make the decision than another admin declining. tutterMouse (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined First step - especially inside userspace - is to address the protector directly. No valid reason provided to change protection and over-ride the panda ₯’ 23:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: ~400 transclusions does not meet the "high-risk" threshold required for protection at the  Template editor level per WP:PINKLOCK may only be used on high-risk templates and modules, and possibly in rarer cases where pages in other namespaces become transcluded to a very high degree, of which this user page is not. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 19:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please consult with the protecting admin first. Mike V • Talk 22:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Technical 13: It appears that you have read the module's log incorrectly. Steel1943 performed a page move, while the protecting admin is DeltaQuad. Mike V • Talk 00:42, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
From my perspective, it appeared that you were confusing Steel1943 as a protecting administrator, since you mentioned inactivity. Steel1943 has a wikibreak notice, while DeltaQuad does not and has been quite active lately. (In fact, he made numerous edits 3 hours ago). Regardless, the proper course of action is posting a request on his talk page. Should he not respond in a couple of days, then you may bring it here. Mike V • Talk 01:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Please either unprotect this page or increase its protection to full at your discretion as WP:PINKLOCK may only be used on high-risk templates and modules, and possibly in rarer cases where pages in other namespaces become transcluded to a very high degree, of which this user page is not. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 19:05, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Please either unprotect this page or increase its protection to full at your discretion as WP:PINKLOCK may only be used on high-risk templates and modules, and possibly in rarer cases where pages in other namespaces become transcluded to a very high degree, of which this user page is not. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 19:05, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. It's a sandbox. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:01, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Please either unprotect this page or increase its protection to full at your discretion as WP:PINKLOCK may only be used on high-risk templates and modules, and possibly in rarer cases where pages in other namespaces become transcluded to a very high degree, of which this user page is not. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 19:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Did you talk to the active admin who created and protected the page about this? Chillum 19:09, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:02, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See WP:ANI#David Horvitz. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:43, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- John Reaves 22:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. George Ho (talk) 18:21, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 22:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Naming has been discussed last year and then this year. Also proposing pending-changes protection due to BLP violations. George Ho (talk) 17:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. plus there is not really enough activity to require pending changes. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 21:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 2000 transclusions does not meet the "high-risk" threshold required for protection at the  Template editor level per WP:PINKLOCK may only be used on high-risk templates and modules, and possibly in rarer cases where pages in other namespaces become transcluded to a very high degree, of which this user page is not. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 19:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please consult with the protecting admin first. Mike V • Talk 22:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continuous edit warring over online statement fancruft added by IP. IPadPerson (talk) 23:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I expect some talk page discussion, and potentially an RfC on the matter. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 18:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. StringTheory11 (t • c) 20:35, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: IP vandalism occur very constantly, sometimes vandalized portions are not noticed and are left out. Please lock it just like almost every other country page is locked.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 21:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP users are adding unsourced material. BattleshipMan (talk) 17:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 21:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 21:03, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 22:35, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and dubious unsourced changes by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 19:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC) Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- John Reaves 22:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent upswing in vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- John Reaves 22:35, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request for Rajat Sharma and India TV

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. GKCH (talk) 18:07, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 22:08, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent template-protection: - Implements the highly-visible, template-protected Template:Babel. moluɐɯ 16:39, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected for a period of forever, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 21:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect due to unconfirmed additions about the Fulham squad being consistently added and reverted as it's unsourced. JMHamo (talk) 16:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 21:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

11 July 2014

Lebron James

Temporary Level 2 (Pending Changes) Protection: LeBron has verbally left the Heat to go back to Cleveland. He has not signed a contract yet. This page has been heavily edited in the past many days. I recommend this page require edits to be reviewed so that not just good faith be maintained but accuracy as well. This page is and will be very popular for the short-term future and in order to provide the most complete and accurate encyclopedic content to the public, speculation as well as vandalism should be avoided where possible for this high-traffic article. cliffsteinman -- Discuss 19:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected As of the most recent RfC on pending changes level 2, there is not a consensus to use it. I have fully protected the article for the edit warring by auto-confirmed accounts. Mike V • Talk 20:30, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense. I had originally put in Full Protection but wanted to make sure I was 100% accurate so I checked the RfProtection article, 2 seemed to fit the best. Also with reviewer rights required, changes would have to be seen at least. However, that doesn't require they're accurate, just good faith. While full protection completely prevents edits, maybe that's too heavy as far as the ability to respond to news, verifiable news. Too bad there isn't a level that requires approval by someone who will verify and cite, like a Reviewer 2 or something. Good news is, Full Protection means I don't have to keep hitting F5 on the history tab while I'm at work. cliffsteinman -- Discuss 20:38, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – POV based pushing on subject's ethnic and ancestral origins by anonymous IP. Reverted several different times by two different editors. Backendgaming (talk) 00:49, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Both the above user and the IP in question have been warned. They are the only two engaging in this edit war over content and will be blocked if they continue. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:38, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page keeps getting hit with vandalism, and it's ramping up as we continue to revert it. We need some protection on this page to help curb the abuse. Urda (talk) 00:18, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Having said that, if it does ramp up, please feel free to report it again. I can see that recently it is only one IP who has been doing this and they have been appropriately warned. Any more vandalism on that page will result in their block. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:42, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Various non-constructive edits ranging from unsourced, messing the page, and targetting Presstv's management which are important for us. User: Xenophrenic and AnomieBOT and Hayek added unfounded claims. Xenophrenic is persisting to add unfounded and wrong information about presstv's management which are not correct. User LibDutch and Mezigue had repeatedly reverted each other. Dr. Shakespeare has corrected but Xenophrenic and Hayek recently added wrong and unclaimed information. Unfounded claim, unreliable quotation and wrong information which are added by Xenophrenic which is targetting its management is as follow, please remove them:

1- "in its management. PressTV headquarters are located in Tehran, Iran." 2- " IRIB is independent of the Iranian government]], but is said to be close to the country's conservative political faction, especially the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution|elite revolutionary guards. Some media analysts and critics have questioned the purpose and effectiveness of Press TV given the repressive environment towards media. Attempts to establish private, independent media outlets in Iran have been restricted or banned, and Reporters Without Frontiers]] has declared Iran to have the highest number of jailed journalists in the Middle East. According to the 1979 Iranian Constitution, all broadcasting must exclusively be government-operated, and in 1994 the Islamic state banned the use of satalite television." Also Xenophrenic removed a citation from last part of coverage: User Hayek added Unfounded claim, unreliable quotation and wrong information are added which is targetting its management: " its head is appointed directly by the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei" please remove it. Please semiprotect this page. RegardsAzirann (talk)Azirann

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Also, I don't know who we is referring to, but if you are in any way associated with the subject of the article, please take note of our conflict of interest guidelines. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:07, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – No one likes her that much so this gets targeted for vandalism fairly steadily, but much more so lately since she was just announced to be returning to the View. Jinkinson talk to me 03:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP seems to be determined to remove any mention of the successor/predecessor of this UN ambassadors, which they have been removing since April 2014. Tachfin (talk) 02:38, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP seems to be determined to remove any mention of the successor/predecessor of this UN ambassadors, which they have been removing since April 2014. Tachfin (talk) 02:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Content blanking conducted by 166.181.3.*. Codename Lisa (talk) 17:30, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Chillum (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (2 weeks) tutterMouse (talk) 18:09, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting one week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. A few Vietnam-based IPs have been hammering this article with unsourced and incoherent content.[20] They've been at this since at least June. Thanks, . Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:35, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:38, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent changes from anonymous/new users going against notes. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 12:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalism (also been featured in media). Iselilja (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. doesn't appear to be too ongoing but as is BLP violation have protected for a small amount of time. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:48, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: I would firstly like to make it clear that this article does not suffer from a lot of vandalism, and the reason for the request is not due to a lot of vandalism on the article. However, occasionally, and very infrequently, some defamatory edits / potentially libellous suggestions have been made. I was concerned particularly that on 9 July 2014, a defamatory suggestion naming two famous people as being potential child abusers, using a very poor source, was put on the article and remained on the article for over 30 minutes before it was deleted. "Pending changes protection" could ensure that the article does not suffer again, as it did on 9 July, from defamatory edits, suggesting the names of famous people involved in child abuse without substantiation or reliable sources. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 15:00, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 15:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Was semi-protected for a week, which ended three days ago. Since then, 1 good edit by an auto-confirmed user, 33 edits by IP vandals and reverts of same. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 22:28, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. hopefully it will die down PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit war between AbramTerger (talk · contribs) and a IP hoping user from the 198.228.216.x range. —Farix (t | c) 14:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over wording regarding a contestant's exit from the competition. Jnorton7558 (talk) 14:07, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - making it a short protect despite the length of the edit war. Hopefully more productive discussion will take place during this time. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, hope it helps. Zhanzhao (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent IP vandalism in the run-up to the World Cup Final, likely to increase in the next few days. --Viennese Waltz 08:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think you are definitely right there... PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:04, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – new users and IP's keep saying that the subject is a raper. The Newspaper (talk) 03:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Chillum (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 11:13, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated spamming by IPs. — LeoFrank  Talk 14:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Discospinster (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 11:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. It is always the same story. Some editors (most of them IPs) vandalize the article, putting offensive terms on the introduction or blanking the page. Please protect. AlchemistOfJoy (talk) 21:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect this article as well as Roman Catholic Diocese of Hallam from IP-hoppers consistently violating WP:CRYSTAL, as this bishop has not yet been installed and has not attained his post (compare Presidential inauguration in the USA). Elizium23 (talk) 20:50, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. StringTheory11 (t • c) 21:41, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Pre-emptive semi-protection of potential edit battle over removed section in violation of WP:CRIT "Editors should avoid having a separate section in an article devoted to criticism", "Do not present the material in a way that over-emphasizes it" as well as further policy as relates to WP:ALIVE "...the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all. Care must be taken with article structure to ensure the overall presentation and section headings are broadly neutral." Section was originally removed on by User:Tsuchan on July 1st, only to be reverted by User:Moxfyre on the same date. I then removed the section again after working on additional substantial improvement of the articles. Edit notated on Talk:GitHub for potential discussion. David Condrey (talk) 22:21, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively.StringTheory11 (t • c) 23:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Linked to the Github article; pre-emptive semi-protection of potential edit battle over removed section in keeping with WP:CRIT and WP:ALIVE. Please reference similar request for Github (above) for further explaination. David Condrey (talk) 22:21, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively.StringTheory11 (t • c) 23:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

12 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism from IP addresses. livelikemusic my talk page! 17:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day. Tiptoety talk 18:06, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by User:Katgraham syd and 2 other IP addresses. IPadPerson (talk) 14:39, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Edits appear to be good faith attempts to improve the content. Article already has pending-changes protection. Diannaa (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --14:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC) Meow

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 15:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --14:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC) Meow

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 15:14, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There are a number of new editors, SPAs and IP editors adding unsourced controversial BLP content, and removing sourced content. Example [21] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2014_kidnapping_and_murder_of_Israeli_teenagers&diff=616267736&oldid=616237725]. Pending changes might be a good alternative to semi. - MrX 11:47, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 15:12, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 22:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 15:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, ignorance of WP:BRD, WP:Consensus, WP:V and WP:OR by User:Kbrose. Firstly, by moving this page's stable title to a controversial title with no consensus, User:Kbrose is violating WP:BRD and playing games to overrun normal Wikipedia procedures. Secondly, User:KBrose is ignoring a near unamious consensus by multiple users to leave this article as it is - See [22]. Thirdly, User:Kbrose is ignoring the source's official wordings for this list, which is explicitly and consistently called "connection speed" on the source - See [23]. Instead, he is inventing the words "akamai documents", which is to be found nowhere in the source, therefore violating both WP:V and WP:OR. YJAX (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism by IP-hopper in New York State. The vandalism started from static IPs belonging to Cornell University in Ithaca yesterday, with one of them being blocked, but has now switched to dynamic IPs in a mobile network. Thomas.W talk 15:44, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of fake informations without sources. Also reverts by myself and one user who keeps blanking a section and adding unsourced information. →Enock4seth (talk) 13:54, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Also you are both autoconfirmed so semi protection isn't going to help. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:24, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Seems to have an edit war stirring up. SkaterLife (talk) 13:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Also pending changes cannot be used during an edit war. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:01, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Genre warring by a disruptive anon IP hopper. STATic message me! 15:17, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 15:25, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Continual and persistent removal of sourced information by IP's and accounts connected to the awards show that are attempting to whitewash the article of negative and sourced items about the ceremony. Nate • (chatter) 22:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 15:05, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I request full page protection for this template to enforse proper discussion and consensus building process around the implementation of TfD outcome. Please see AN/I discussion for details. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 15:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: One of the users involved in the dispute has said they intend to avoid the area so full protection shouldn't be necessary. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. The article was recently semi-protected for three weeks. Since the semi-protection expired three days ago, there have been 11 IP vandalism edits. DH85868993 (talk) 10:40, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – High profile incident that is emotionally charged. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 20:29, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pending changes protection should not be used on pages with a high edit rate. Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: In the last two months, there's been unexplained drive-by IP genre changes (mainly the removal of certain genres, despite them being cited in the prose), unexplained deletion of a large amount of content and the addition of unsourced trivia. Some of this has just happened as recently as yesterday. Kokoro20 (talk) 17:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:18, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued attempt to change developer for this game, as misrepresntation of a recent article, believing that Ubisoft Quebec will be the lead on this game. They will be the lead on a future AC title. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:47, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:22, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: (30 days should be enough, I hope) - repeated attempts to add a name the band's early history without providing a source to back it up. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:21, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Double the time from last time. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: The album is not out for a few more days (July 15) but people are making guesses or pulling in unverifable information on the tracks and as such, introducing original research. Needs to be fully protected (given that we have registered users doing this) until its release. MASEM (t) 02:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And apparently there is an illegal leak of the album and people are trying to add info justified on that (which also begs other issues). --MASEM (t) 05:32, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've semi'd it for now, hopefully the confirmed users will get the message. I'll watchlist it and if they continue I'll full protect it. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Farhan112233 keeps dirpting the page by creating socks or through IPs. This is the latest one. Since the disruption is slow (but persistent), a long duration semi would be preferred. — LeoFrank  Talk 02:42, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:12, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Infrequent but continual vandalism by accounts with few total edits. RestoreIntegrity (talk) 01:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:14, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 400+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 18:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:18, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting pending changes protection given it's long history of vandalism by IP addresses. It's been semi-protected in the past, but a softer protection will allow IPs to edit while being reviewed or declined by autoconfirmed users. 09:29, 11 July 2014 (UTC) 174.236.104.177 (talk) 09:29, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, this needs regular semi-protection from IP editors who are adding unwanted and improperly sourced content, such as the user who posted this request.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pending changes protection is better. You can decline any change you don't like. Then again, you keep treating PR pages like your own playground and reject any edits that are not by you. 22:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.236.104.173 (talk)
I'm tempted to fully protect it because I see you are both warring on the page. Take it to the talk page, both of you. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:45, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There's no need to fully protect it when one guy on a dynamic IP keeps adding content that is irrelevant (the mention of the next season's title) and improperly sourced (the new episode entry). And I've attempted to post to his user talk page about this but the IP keeps changing. And in one case he preemptively left me a message complaining that I would inform him that he's wrong.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 03:39, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, protection in question has to be upgraded to semi-protection due to sockpuppetry. These IPs have all been User:Wiki-star, aka User:Dragonron, who has a thing for reverting me on the Power Rangers episode list pages. The range that the IP editors adding the content I've reverted as well as those trying to keep me from getting the page protected have been blocked in the past for being used by the sockmaster.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 03:53, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Tiptoety. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism, disruptive editing and dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 05:36, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JayJayWhat did I do? 04:51, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Chillum.. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:05, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected.. Tiptoety talk 04:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sam Sing! 20:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Slon02 (talk) 23:18, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 22:40, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 23:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recently deceased actor; to protect due to a recent death. livelikemusic my talk page! 20:00, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 23:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tons of vandals. Second Skin (talk) 16:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 23:22, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Spout of activity following police request to photograph a 17-yr old's erect private part in sexting case. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 20:10, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 23:25, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs beginning in 175.157 (dial-up geolocating to Sri Lanka) have been misrepresenting sources in the article. This has been extensively discussed on the talk page, and Keithbob, Pengortm and myself have collaborated to clarify what the sources really say. During this time, the IPs were quiet, and I opposed a previous RFPP for this article, which was declined on 5 July. However, now that the work has been done, the IP has returned and is repeating the misrepresentation. Since they stood aside for nearly 2 weeks while the collaboration was going on, I fear semi-protection will be needed for some time. --Stfg (talk) 19:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 21:54, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Against WP:Label, the IPs keep adding the folling line "Human Rights in Singapore are abysmal." as the first sentence of the article. In the case of 2 of the IPs, User_talk:182.23.156.149 and User_talk:202.156.150.124, they were pointed to the relevant policy (which was also stated in the "undo"s I made), but they keep reverting without bothering to engage. Zhanzhao (talk) 14:03, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked User:202.156.150.124 for a period of 72 hours. That should stop it for now. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:46, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. (For the bot.) Mike V • Talk 17:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: registered editor continues to edit the article with out sourcing despite that is why it is currently under semi-protected. He hasn't responded to the talk page discussion nor a post on his talk page. Spshu (talk) 19:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The issue is primarily confined to two users, so I don't think protection is necessary. In addition, the reverting isn't too frequent to after semi-protection to move to full. I left a note on the user's talk page to help encourage discussion. Mike V • Talk 17:16, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

13 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Many IPs and new users have been changing the current team of the subject, regarding an unfinished signing deal i.e. BLP violations. DaHuzyBru (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Gilliam (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (2 weeks) tutterMouse (talk) 15:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Many IPs and new users have been changing the current team of the subject, regarding an unfinished signing deal. See the page's history. PC is already enabled but a temporary semi may be used. Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 14:10, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Gilliam (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (2 weeks) tutterMouse (talk) 16:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article has been attacked by new accounts and IP addresses with vandalism since July 10. WayKurat (talk) 07:20, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs and other new users. Request for page protection for at least two weeks. Please also include Pinoy Big Brother: All In as this page is also being vandalized by the same people vandalizing the former (same duration). AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 03:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I have, however, semi-protected Pinoy Big Brother: All In for 1 month.--Slon02 (talk) 05:43, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - repeated violations of the WP:BLP policy by unregistered and newly registered accounts. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Slon02 (talk) 05:39, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing: repeated vandalism due to recent media coverage, continuing after expiration of previous protection. EricSerge (talk) 02:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one real vandalism since protected expired over a week ago. Let's see if it picks up.--Slon02 (talk) 05:41, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting PC1 for a week or two; lots of edits speculating on team. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:25, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 05:36, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 27 edits warring over which team, if any, he is signed to. requesting PC1 for a week or two. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 05:37, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:NighlokKen (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – User is abusing talk page privileges by basically saying "I'm going to keep making more accounts and harass Ryulong". —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 01:36, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed.. Tiptoety talk 01:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Hilltrot (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Pursuant to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/L'Aquotique. Extreme sockpuppetry on this user's talk page. IPs, new accounts. The whole lot. Causing a whole lot of unneeded strife among the editing rank and file. . RGloucester — ☎ 04:17, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day. Tiptoety talk 04:25, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP adding non-existance countries, that it is coming back and current that it is on qubo. Spshu (talk) 19:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Swell, now some editor has hit me with 3RR warning over the current IP editor continually adding unsourced nonsense (Jetix on qubo after Jetix has closed down) to the article. Even after I posted here. --Spshu (talk) 20:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Slon02 (talk) 00:55, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editor re-inserts unsourced (and dubious) information about a BLP into the article every few days. Does not respond to attempts to contact them on their talk page. Guettarda (talk) 18:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have issued a final warning because of the editor's persistence despite numerous previous warnings.--Slon02 (talk) 01:02, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – it continues to be vandalizedd. The Newspaper (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Mattheon (talk · contribs) blocked by Gilliam.. StringTheory11 (t • c) 21:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Often IP vandalized by attending students, adding their own names to "notable alumni", adding biased information, etc. Kevin4789 (talk) 19:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The last time that occurred, by looking at the page history, was in April. Hardly cause for page protection. AlanS (talk) 19:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. StringTheory11 (t • c) 21:24, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Altodo's IP socks are attacking the page. The Newspaper (talk) 15:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC) Protection do not needed. The sockpuppet is YousufMiah 86.185.186.149 (talk) 21:48, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —Tom Morris (talk) 23:05, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden spate of vandalism. Launchballer 01:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 01:09, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by newly created single purpose accounts and IPs. AlanS (talk) 18:39, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 00:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 36 hour protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users to get us through the weekend. Article is a frequent target of a Scotland-based sock operator. Some recent IPs, though not necessarily him, are being disruptive:[24][25][26] Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:36, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 01:04, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seeing that on a daily basis editors are having to revert fancruft, changing sales without sources and IP vandals on this Featured list, it surely does need the protection. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:37, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 01:06, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism from multiple IPs. . RGloucester — ☎ 15:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 01:09, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Impossible trying to keep up with vandalism, restoring of false content content by IPs which has been discussed on talk page. Vaypertrail (talk) 23:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 00:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – None of edits by non-corfirmed users is good. This month bad edits continue. George Ho (talk) 22:56, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 00:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced edits by multiple IPs over the footballer's move to a new club when deal has not been officially completed. LRD NO (talk) 19:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 00:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 19:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 00:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP sockpuppets of Altodo are making attacks on the page. The Newspaper (talk) 15:39, 12 July 2014 (UTC) Protection do not needed. Currently there is just an edit warring. 86.185.186.149 (talk) 21:46, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:50, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Redirect page with no other content, which now points to a non-existent article section and can't be changed by normal users. Closeapple (talk) 17:25, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you discuss this with the protecting admin first? If you just want the redirect target changed though that can be done with an edit request. --kelapstick(bainuu) 22:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mark Arsten is currently elsewhere so not really something that'll be answered quickly but an edit request would be better if there's a better place to point it (though I'd like to know where). tutterMouse (talk) 13:42, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Closeapple: Edit request is the best idea. To save bureaucracy if you let us know here where you think the page should direct to one of us can implement it. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Callanecc. It looks like it should be #REDIRECT Wikimedia UK#Chairman resigns. --Closeapple (talk) 20:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done kelapstick(bainuu) 20:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

14 July 2014

Temporary full protection Ongoing edit war and an increasingly toxic talk page on this newly-passed FA. Admin oversight also needed on the talk page for the rising level of incivility. - SchroCat (talk) 17:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. StringTheory11 (t • c) 18:21, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP is being edited with non-neutral wording by multiple brand-new editors (possible sock- or meatpuppetry). Bahooka (talk) 16:31, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. StringTheory11 (t • c) 18:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full move protection: Current title was discussed in an RM; shouldn't be changed again without proper discussion. Heymid (contribs) 16:17, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. StringTheory11 (t • c) 18:18, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 11:06, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The most recent IP has been blocked. Apart from that one, it doesn't look too bad really, especially considering the subject matter. Relist if it gets worse or if the most recent one IP hops. GedUK  13:16, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Damián80

Semi-protection: Hello request that my user page Protect, ElNiñoMonstruo since the user has taken as a place for vandalism. I know, because the ip is from Philippines and I mention the user is the same place. Prefer prevent because otherwise an edit wars would begin.--Damián80 (talk) 16:21, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. StringTheory11 (t • c) 18:15, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Adding of unreferenced informations. — Ascii002 Let's talk! Contribs 08:54, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --GedUK  12:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Despite having pending changes in place, IPs are repeatedly inserting and reinserting unsourced information resulting in an edit war. Article is currently unstable. -- Wikipedical (talk) 02:22, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, 2 edits only so far in July is hardly a mark of an unstable article. PC seems to be working fine, there's also been accepted IP edits. GedUK  12:06, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/L'Aquotique, and its archives. Sock-puppets continually try to reinsert content removed by consensus, with no sign of stopping. RGloucester — ☎ 14:38, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Whilst there certainly seems to be socking going on, there's also lots of constructive IP edits. The frequency of the former isn't really high enough to require protection which would also stop the latter. Pending changes wouldn't work on here because the overall edit count is too high. relist if the socking really picks up, but at this stage it seems reasonably manageable. GedUK  11:58, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Against WP:Label, the IPs keep adding the folling line "Human Rights in Singapore are abysmal." as the first sentence of the article. In the case of 2 of the IPs, User_talk:182.23.156.149 and User_talk:202.156.150.124, they were pointed to the relevant policy (which was also stated in the "undo"s I made), but they keep reverting without bothering to engage. Note this is the second request, as the original request was dealt with by blocking User_talk:202.156.150.124[[27]], but the new revert is by User_talk:182.23.156.149 who was unsanctioned who merely rephrased the it ("Human rights in Singapore are very poor, and considered abysmal by many. This is due to the fact that the "), making it an OR issue as well. Zhanzhao (talk) 06:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection was recently made for this page, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot I NotifyOnline 06:36, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Further Comment: Cos it isn't working. One of the IP got banned which stopped that IP's revisions, but that does not help with the present revisions. Comment just got re-added again (luckily some other editors are starting to step in), but looks like its gonna persist.... Zhanzhao (talk) 10:36, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:52, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We could use some page protection, this article has always been a target of a lot different kinds of vandalism, needs attention all the time. . Hafspajen (talk) 05:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --GedUK  12:48, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP insertions by IPs and new accounts. Binksternet (talk) 04:38, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:16, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: High level of unsourced additions and vandalism by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 04:30, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This one is on the cusp between semi and not as there's quite a few constructive IP edits too. Ideally PC would be used, but the overall edit count is far too high, well over 100 edits in less than 2 days. So going for short semi-protection instead. GedUK  12:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Nishidani (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Continual automated vandalism by IP's and non-autoconfirmed accounts connected to one sockmaster. Could also do with some major oversighting as the pagelog is spammed with those contribs. Nate • (chatter) 08:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. GedUK  12:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:26, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --GedUK  12:04, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unsourced edits of the same issue by multiple IPs over the last few days. Footballer's squad number has not been officially confirmed. Request for a month's PP since squad numbers will be released by then. Thank you. LRD NO (talk) 22:55, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --GedUK  12:01, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I would request page protection of Qassam rocket, Recently i have seen there are users accused of editing article without reliable source and offensive words included. Please include protection temporary to avoid damages to encyclopedia. Prince Sulaiman (talk) 08:39, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism due to recent contraversy and announcements. Thatdee69 (talk) 08:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP has been at it again changing the lead over and over again. Gaba (talk) 15:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:23, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For several years now, this page has been repeatedly plagued by anonymous users making the same edit: adding two non-notable entries to this disambiguation page. This page has been protected previously for the same reason, and the exact same pattern of disruptive editing resumed immediately once protection was lifted. . Steve CarlsonTalk 06:02, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
I'm not keen on indefinite semi-protection. If it resumes after an entire year of semi-protection, that may be the only option... —Tom Morris (talk) 10:18, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection Low-level IP vandalism. She did not commit suicide by immolation, and I didn't notice the uncited change until three months afterwards. Not only is such vandalism quite painful for her brother and myself, it damages the integrity of Wikipedia, and I wish to preclude it. kencf0618 (talk) 03:12, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined While unfortunate, I don't think there is enough vandalism to warrant protection. I would encourage you to add the article to your watchlist so that you may closely monitor any changes to the article. Mike V • Talk 03:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's on my watchlist, but this was an unexpected malicious event which fell between the cracks. I shall pay closer attention henceforth. Thanks! kencf0618 (talk) 04:54, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism due to being the World Cup final goalscorer. JMHamo (talk) 21:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WP:BLP, I'll let someone else here consider whether to extend it. --j⚛e deckertalk 22:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., also 1 user User(s) blocked. --j⚛e deckertalk 04:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection Semi-protected article is undergoing edit warring by multiple editors regarding a reported trade of this basketball player from Houston to Los Angeles. Since this 18:10, 11 July 2014‎ version, article has been unstable with changes back and forth from last stable version with "Houston" to new proposed changes with "Los Angeles". I started a discussion at Talk:Jeremy_Lin#Trade_to_LA, but there has been no other participation. One week of protection is recommended.—Bagumba (talk) 16:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Withdrawing my request, as official announcement has since been made. —Bagumba (talk) 01:41, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Common target of vandals, both IPs and accounts. Paris1127 (talk) 23:10, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 03:54, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Fans of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure are not going to stop adding Jotaro Kujo to this list because they're all immature children. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 20:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Materialscientist. Mike V • Talk 04:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Personal attacks because of my opinions. Uishaki (talk) 23:16, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi-protected by Bishonen for a year. Mike V • Talk 04:17, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Operation Protective Edge (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing and insults. Uishaki (talk) 23:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. The page was revdel'd by a few admins and semi-protected for 3 hours by Smalljim. (Which has since expired.) I've watchlisted the page and will monitor it for any further disruption. Mike V • Talk 03:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Uishaki (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass vandalism and personal attacks from two IP addresses . Uishaki (talk) 23:13, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Bishonen. Mike V • Talk 03:23, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over whether or not to include information on modeling has begun and is likely to continue due to Elgort's fans removing information per the subject's request on Twitter. Full protection until a discussion takes place is best, here. Especially with the semi protection expiring today. Gloss • talk 18:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done (For the bot.) Mike V • Talk 03:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by IPs. Not vandalism as such, but disruptive editing by IPs. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:55, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Dennis Brown. Mike V • Talk 03:34, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There is an open SPI for Reema Welling but it is taking ages to sort out due to the backlog. The various anons keep coming back with inappropriate sources and unsourced BLP violations. Sitush (talk) 12:09, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 01:37, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unsourced edits and vandalism by multiple IP vandals over the last few days. Footballer is the subject of transfer speculation. Request for one week's PP. Thank you. LRD NO (talk) 22:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 01:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Large number of IP edits regarding unconfirmed NBA trade. Natg 19 (talk) 22:36, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 01:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after world cup loss. Gordonrox24 | Talk 22:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Slon02 (talk) 01:23, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism after they won the World Cup tonight. JMHamo (talk) 21:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Slon02 (talk) 01:22, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This article keeps receiving vandalism edits from an editor with sockpuppets, User:Jetson2012. Gparyani (talk) 21:39, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 01:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This article keeps receiving vandalism edits from an editor who has sockpuppets, User:Jetson2012. Gparyani (talk) 21:36, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 01:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

15 July 2014

Semi-protection: Vandalism by anon IP editors and new users on a BLP. STATic message me! 21:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 21:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: As this high profile film is about to release in two weeks, it is beginning to attract poor/unsourced/OR edits. Would like to request a semi protection for the page of at least two months, to cover the film's release, and shortly after, so established editors (like myself), can spend the time properly adding and enhancing the page, then having to sift through vandalism to restore the article. If not semi, then perhaps a pending changes protection. As an additional note, please see other articles for films in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, to see similar page protection patterns upon their theatrical release, as a comparison and evidence of the type of traffic these articles attract. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:53, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 21:00, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vietnam-based IPs have been vanadalizing this template since early July, for example, here where they change the name of Lumiere the candlestick to "Light's" (possessive?) Obviously not here to be constructive. They are also modifying the template to perpetuate what appears to be a hoax surrounding an alleged 2015 animated Beauty and the Beast series. Requesting 30 day protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users since the disruptive users have been the only IP editors to modify the template in the last month or so. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:48, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 20:56, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal keeps restoring the same edit, semi should put an end to it. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 15:24, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Chillum (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 16:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal keeps restoring the same edit, semi should put an end to it. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 15:24, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Chillum (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 16:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi- Persistent IP vandalism. BMK (talk) 14:27, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (1 week) tutterMouse (talk) 16:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – He's back. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:41, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Reaper Eternal (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (3 months) tutterMouse (talk) 16:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Wikipedia:PPOL#User_pages. Good afternoon (talk) 12:17, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been protected before to deal with the vandals, and they keep coming back. If not indefinite, possibly a pending changes protection. Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 04:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of unsourced material. Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 04:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP addresses and new accounts changing club information when nothing is official. Fixed4u (talk) 21:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 23:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The number of episodes have been randomly been changed by IPs and new accounts. But only 3 episodes have been confirmed so far. —Farix (t | c) 21:49, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 04:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article about professional footballer that sees frequent vandalism and/or unsourced edits because of transfer speculations (unsourced speculations that see him in either Arsenal or Liverpool, with fans of both clubs targeting the article...). Thomas.W talk 19:26, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 04:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: A potential sockpuppet moved the page and gives no reason why. The proper way to spell the word "Supercopa" is without the capital C. It's spelled that way on clubs Morelia and Tigres websites and also reliable websites such as Marca, ESPN, Record, Medio Tiempo and others. GoPurple'nGold24 21:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected Mike V • Talk 23:37, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring from IPs over genres. TheOnlyOne12 (talk) 21:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Mike V • Talk 23:34, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent re-addition of promotional material by IP-hopper. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 20:37, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 00:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 48 hour protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. IP 206.110.235.15 has been attempting to corrupt the article through numerical vandalism. Thanks, . Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:30, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 18:57, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent upswing in introducing NPOV unsourced statements that do not add anything to the article. PaintedCarpet (talk) 18:09, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. StringTheory11 (t • c) 18:22, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lower to semi-protected. I requested full protection of this page nearly five years ago, and completely forgot about its existence until now (I never really paid attention when I edited my userpage). I hate the wording used on it, and frankly, just want to be able to change it when I please. Not sure why I asked for the full in the first place, to be honest. Corvoe (speak to me) 17:09, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lowered to semi-protection. Mike V • Talk 20:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

16 July 2014

Indefinite semi-protection or Indefinite pending changes: article was previously semi-protected for 3 months due to constant BLP-infringing edits, after the protection ended the BLP-infringing edits continued (most recent a few hours ago). --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think this has been linked from an extremist site, because there's been a spate of IP vandalism. However, I would also suggest indefinite semiprotection, because a huge amount of edits to the article are the same sort of vandalism (editing a quotation because they don't like it), just not always as rapid. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've temporarily semi-protected the article. I hesitate to protect it because it's an article I can imagine editing contentwise in the future and normally try to avoid stepping in in articles where that's the case, but they're clearly editwarring over an accurately attributed quote. I've not edited the article contentwise in the past and really have no strong feelings about the content of the article, but did verify the quote with the full online OED, and will block the IP/user for obvious blatant vandalism if they continue committing obvious blatant vandalism. Kevin Gorman (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected. Tagging for bot archiving. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: YouTuber with a young, internet-active, audience is resulting in a lot of edits which are often useful but only after having been checked. There's also a lot of undesirable edits too so think page protection is the way to go instead of preventing those which are useful. It's also working well for other similar articles. Nikthestunned 15:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 16:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs changing club information all the time. Fixed4u (talk) 14:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 16:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Thargor Orlando (talk) 18:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by FreeRangeFrog --j⚛e deckertalk 18:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced/incorrect information. No responses at talk. Jetstreamer Talk 18:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: YouTuber with a young, internet-active, audience is resulting in a lot of edits which are often useful but only after having been checked. There's also a lot of undesirable edits too so think page protection is the way to go instead of preventing those which are useful. It's also working well for other similar articles. Nikthestunned 15:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 16:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated violations of WP:CRYSTAL reporting new bishop who has not yet attained his post via installation. Elizium23 (talk) 22:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Users involved are confirmed editors, semi-protection will do nothing. GedUK  11:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by an IP editor on a featured article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  11:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism and edit warring. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  11:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by IP-hopping editor against consensus. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  11:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dear administrators, my user page has been attacked and vandalized by someone using IP number 80.218.130.112, can you please help me protect my user page ?. Conde Tony Piazzi 15:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected - Tiptoety talk 15:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 15:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week. Tiptoety talk 15:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term problems with unsourced POV-pushing, misrepresentation of sources etc. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I've warned the most recent user. GedUK  11:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Currently in the news - IPs repeatedly adding excessive details regarding alleged criminal acts for which he was acquitted. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months. Tiptoety talk 15:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect due to a lot of unhelpful anon edits being made that need fixing/correcting. JMHamo (talk) 11:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HofKal (talk) 02:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined All of the users involved are autoconfirmed and there isn't justification for full protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 12:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. GedUK  12:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: IP Sock Evasion attempting to continue an 8 month edit war . Hell in a Bucket (talk) 11:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:05, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - 93.74.143.120

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --GedUK  12:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors, such as changing votes before they occur. Needs another week or two of semi-protection. ~~JHUbal27 08:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long story ... Derek Jeter All-Star Game stuff. Jprg1966 (talk) 03:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 23:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Some person tried to add an actress's name just because the film dedicates to the memory of that actress. And that person added cause of death without verifiable source... Or maybe that person is spewing libel or slander. George Ho (talk) 21:14, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --GedUK  11:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by new accounts and IP addresses. Fixed4u (talk) 18:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. ///EuroCarGT 18:11, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is currently under AfD and needs to be protected as IP users continue to add information to make her try and sound notable. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --GedUK  11:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: For some reason there have been a number of anonymous accounts changing the old India PM to the new one - even though this happened in 2013. Suggest a temporary anon edit block. KylieTastic (talk) 17:12, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is a highly targeted article and now protection is removed and we have same problem again, content getting changed or vandalized. Very few page watchers too. Basically it is just me and I noticed that vandalism is often undiscovered by the usual page patrolers, who knows why. Hafspajen (talk) 16:03, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --GedUK  11:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 72 hour protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. The majority of IP edits this month (and back to the beginning of the year, really) have been from disruptive Vietnam-based IPs intent on inserting gibberish and hoax content into this article. In the last few days I've been trying to protect pages edited by 117.3.101.66, who is attempting to proliferate a hoax that a Beauty and the Beast animated series will air in 2015. I'm hoping that page protection will dissuade the user. Here is their most recent edit: [28]. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The overall incidence level is low, and not high enough for semi protection in my view. However, I think pending changes may do the job at the edit frequency isn't that high. Let's see if it has an effect. --GedUK  11:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Player may sign for Hibs, IPs kee adding he has. Murry1975 (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Several IP editors keep removing csd template for this non-notable person. Article has been re-created at least once before. Maybe wp:salt is in order?. Thebestofall007 (talk) 06:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is a bit juvenile to say the least. I've reported the IP for edit warring and the creator for username violation. Salting would be good, because I have the feeling this one is going to keep on getting recreated. AlanS (talk) 06:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:58, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 04:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There is a whole host of recent vandalism of this due to the ongoing Palestinian-Israeli hostilities. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 15:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of disruptive editing by IPs and new users, including constant changes of the list of singles against the information in sources, and ignoring explanation on the talk page. Also addition of fake chart positions and certifications, unsourced genres, among other things. 2Flows (talk) 13:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of gossip, newspaper speculation and unsourced entries to BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 11:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 30 day protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. Page was converted to a redirect in 2012. Within the last month, disruptive Vietnam-based IPs have converted the redirect into an unsourced article about an alleged 2015 animated Beauty and the Beast series. This has hoax all over it. Angela Lansbury as "Mr. [sic] Potts Tea" (she was Mrs. Potts in the film), and Jerry Orbach as "Light's [sic] the Candlestick" (the character is Lumiere). The prose in the article is mostly gibberish. IP user(s) are persistent and previous interactions with editors presumed to be the same were not answered. I think the 30 day protection is reasonable considering the article has only been edited by disruptive IPs since it was turned into a redirect. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I initially marked it as a speedy, but after reviewing the edit history, as Cyphoidbomb had done, I saw the redirect and restored it. Will have it on my watchlist to see if it sticks. --McDoobAU93 16:52, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks McDoob! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Still need admin intervention on this. User has returned for more nonsense. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by newly created single purpose accounts and IPs. AlanS (talk) 11:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 22:08, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. This page is a mess. Jim1138 (talk) 10:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also, I placed un grande tag on the page. Bearian (talk) 21:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 02:28, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by Acroterion (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) tutterMouse (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

17 July 2014

Temporary full protection: Edit warring. This page was protected recently when LeBron had announced his intent to go to Cleveland but hadn't yet signed a contract. He now has signed and the page has been unprotected. However, he has not chosen a number and the page is consistently being edited to give him the number 6. I am rolling these back as they happen but it should be full protected until this decision has been made official. cliffsteinman -- Discuss 15:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Trying to protect for one week; experiencing technical difficulties. Now protected - one week. Go Phightins! 17:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection To many Ips vandalising.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawiki1534 (talk • contribs) 15:41 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 14:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 16:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Chillum. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:09, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Ohnoitsjamie. Mike V • Talk 17:14, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Alexf. Mike V • Talk 17:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Ohnoitsjamie. Mike V • Talk 17:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 15:05, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Alexf. Mike V • Talk 17:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: PC not working; New users adding unreliable links, and disruptive material. [29] is also relevent here. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Nick. Mike V • Talk 17:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered user keeps deleting whole sections. --Kbabej (talk) 04:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, There's a good discussion on the talk page since the new users made their edits. At this stage I think protection would be overkill, and indefinite definitely would be. GedUK  12:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced edits and vandalism. Previous PP was insufficient and disruptive editing resumed after it expired. LRD NO (talk) 15:34, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I second, contract talks and speculation. Both registered and IP users are making unsourced edits concerning a contract that is not official. They are hopeful fans though...cliffsteinman -- Discuss 15:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated BLP violations by new users. Scimonster (talk) 13:35, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to request the same. Persistent attempts by IP users to remove certain sourced information. Debresser (talk) 14:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 16:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article is on a current and sensitive political controversy, which is attracting brand new accounts and IPs to insert uncited or poorly cited (blogs) material and continuously edit war. '''tAD''' (talk) 14:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, At the moment there's only one (possbly two) users involved in disruption. At this point action against them for edit warring will prbably be more constructive. If more get involved, relist. GedUK  12:15, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Addresses continue to vandalize the article. Fixed4u (talk) 12:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:48, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism in article since 2012, announced by the original vandal on reddit. This has lead to IP edit warring, despite agreement on talk page to keep the information out. I'd do it myself, but have been involved in the discussion. WormTT(talk) 12:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:49, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous of IP Addresses are vandalising Mukesh Ambani, I request a temporary page protection for an article at Mukesh Ambani. Prince Sulaiman Talk to me 10:56, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors changing his name and often his current club without a source or deal to be completed. Kante4 (talk) 14:28, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Every year I think we should just protect all footballers articles for the period the window is open. *sigh* GedUK  12:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Several IPs and new users try to remove the only part of the article that cites sources which are not affiliated to the subject, to remove any mentions of the political controversies where this man is involved. Cambalachero (talk) 13:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me like edit warring between autoconfirmed users.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi protection is no use against confirmed editors, as at least two in this issue seem to be. Hopefully proection will spur on some discsion on the noticeboard where it's been raised. GedUK  12:05, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There seems to be a recent rape case that might involve teachers at the school. Sjö (talk) 09:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This appears to be the work of one editor only.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is lot of vandalism reverts on this page history, I suggest indefinite protection. Prince Sulaiman Talk to me 00:29, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:49, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page is frequently edited to indicate the subject was born in 1985. The subject was born in 1981 and the source of this information is the subject's director profile at the UK's Companies House. Filing of false information at Companies House is an offence, therefore I am satisfied it is accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.220.98.40 (talk • contribs)

Declined Try using the talk page, the user(s) talk page, or at the very least an edit summary to communicate the veracity of your claim. — MusikAnimal talk 02:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and false claims by several users/IP's. IPadPerson (talk) 01:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 02:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anon IP editors and new users to a BLP. STATic message me! 00:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and dubious unsourced additions to a BLP. STATic message me! 15:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 03:05, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of unconstructive edits by IP editors. TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 168 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 21:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:DailyNewsUpdate (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Using user page to make personal attacks after their indefinite block for making legal threats. STATic message me! 17:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Mike V • Talk 17:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP fancruft vandalism of an upcoming, return character to The Young and the Restless, next month. livelikemusic my talk page! 16:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --j⚛e deckertalk 17:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Actual, encyclopedic article created at DashCon, needs redirect. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Redirect created and tagged, which in turn removes protection. Thanks, kelapstick(bainuu) 21:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

18 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – To prevent from sockpuppet users. — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ʜᴜʜ? 14:25, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – To prevent from sockpuppet users. — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ʜᴜʜ? 14:25, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could somebody please see what's going on with this article. The history reveals multiple recent deletions by at least three anonymous users and it seems like someone is using anonymity at multiple locations to skirt the rules. I, as a registered user have been stymied in my attempts to keep the article honest. Can something be done or should I just bow out? JaneOlds (talk) 12:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The editors that you are concerned about are removing content which may violate Wikipedia policy (WP:BLP). Please assume good faith of other users and discuss your concerns on the article talk page. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – SPA Lancy2015 has repeatedly attempted to insert some potentially libelous content in this article that suggests the owner of this notable website could face criminal prosecution, etc. [30] It's potentially damaging, contravenes NPOV, and s/he's attempted to submit this content several times today. [31][32][33][34]. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  11:48, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing fancruft/inflation going against sources provided. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 21:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's one IP at the moment. Repeat the warnings, then report to WP:AIV. GedUK  11:46, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent non-confirmed or auto-confirmed user activity. Page needs protected for concern to stop vanldalism. Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 19:01, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  11:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs being used to repeatedly restore trivial content against apparent consensus. SummerPhD (talk) 14:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 14:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by Tim Woodcock (as evidenced by a recent posting at the top of my talk page which I have removed) inserting false information. Launchballer 13:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 15:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent events involving MH 17 is beginning to show inappropriate IP changes to MH 370 article, e.g., [35] reverted by [36]. Recommend semi-protection. JoeSperrazza (talk) 16:34, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  11:27, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit-warring socks of Arb12345 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 14:09, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  11:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Request temporary FPP there is an ongoing edit war over this page which is essentially not a live reporting blog. Suggest 3 days to a week to allow discussions to actually take place rather than just re versions. GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 05:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Seems to have passed now? GedUK  11:20, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Multiple editors on both 'sides' of an issue involved in slow moving edit war. Both 'sides' claim they want to engage on talk page but then go through large edits without discussing on talk page. Page needs to be locked down for discussion to actually happen.Marauder40 (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Ta;lk page indicates they've reached agreement. GedUK  11:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Solarra (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry and vandalism - Multiple sockpuppets keep vandalizing my talk page, and while I am hesitant to request protection of it, the recent BLP vandalism specifically causes concern. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 08:01, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yunshui 雲水 08:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism - Unregistered users/IP address keeps changing the plot of the film and sometimes adding nonsense things in the article. Alphonsewan (talk) 09:46, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 21:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: User:Jrfw51 requested page protection with the following comment on Talk:Omez: Several editors have confirmed that the Redirect to Omperazole is appropriate but this has been reversed several times by unregistered users. He has asked that someone make a request for him. I have no opinion on the matter at this time. Mz7 (talk) 21:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Needs to be full protection, as everyone involved is confirmed. GedUK  11:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopper keeps re-introducing PEACOCK language into the article. I have raised concerns at Talk:The_13th_Warrior#Peacock_language and at User_talk:2602:304:AF53:3E99:B92F:C00B:466C:288 but they just ignore and revert. The article needs to be semi-protected until they at least engage in discussion. Betty Logan (talk) 20:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Keeps attracting edits from sockpuppets of User:SpongebobLawyerPants. Gparyani (talk) 20:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --GedUK  11:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Controversial figure related to current event. ·¤:•.°windjade.☼°.¤: 19:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC) - yes please protect - hot topic Mosfetfaser (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Tonight was the final episode of this cancelled series. This is a high-profile article related to a popular children's television series. Requesting 2 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. The typical stuff we see in these instances are hoax edits claiming that the series hasn't been cancelled, expressions of sadness, optimistic edits hoping it's a mistake, and uninformed changes to the lead where the series is changed from "is" to "was" contravening WP:TVLEAD. Article has already experienced problems from earnest editors in advance of cancellation. Protection is warranted to dissuade vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:46, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not wrong, it was protected last year in October for a year so that's a decent amount of time for the profile of the show to hopefully lower once the protection expires. Anyone who is currently editing is already autoconfirmed and I doubt it's worth taking upto full. tutterMouse (talk) 07:14, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected.. GedUK  11:44, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Change to temporary semi-protection: The new episode will be air less than 12 hours. ApprenticeFan work 13:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. GedUK  11:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 21:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: User:Jrfw51 requested page protection with the following comment on Talk:Omez: Several editors have confirmed that the Redirect to Omperazole is appropriate but this has been reversed several times by unregistered users. He has asked that someone make a request for him. I have no opinion on the matter at this time. Mz7 (talk) 21:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Needs to be full protection, as everyone involved is confirmed. GedUK  11:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Tonight was the final episode of this cancelled series. This is a high-profile article related to a popular children's television series. Requesting 2 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. The typical stuff we see in these instances are hoax edits claiming that the series hasn't been cancelled, expressions of sadness, optimistic edits hoping it's a mistake, and uninformed changes to the lead where the series is changed from "is" to "was" contravening WP:TVLEAD. Article has already experienced problems from earnest editors in advance of cancellation. Protection is warranted to dissuade vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:46, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not wrong, it was protected last year in October for a year so that's a decent amount of time for the profile of the show to hopefully lower once the protection expires. Anyone who is currently editing is already autoconfirmed and I doubt it's worth taking upto full. tutterMouse (talk) 07:14, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected.. GedUK  11:44, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Change to temporary semi-protection: The new episode will be air less than 12 hours. ApprenticeFan work 13:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. GedUK  11:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Solarra (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry and vandalism - Multiple sockpuppets keep vandalizing my talk page, and while I am hesitant to request protection of it, the recent BLP vandalism specifically causes concern. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 08:01, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yunshui 雲水 08:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism - Unregistered users/IP address keeps changing the plot of the film and sometimes adding nonsense things in the article. Alphonsewan (talk) 09:46, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopper keeps re-introducing PEACOCK language into the article. I have raised concerns at Talk:The_13th_Warrior#Peacock_language and at User_talk:2602:304:AF53:3E99:B92F:C00B:466C:288 but they just ignore and revert. The article needs to be semi-protected until they at least engage in discussion. Betty Logan (talk) 20:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Keeps attracting edits from sockpuppets of User:SpongebobLawyerPants. Gparyani (talk) 20:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --GedUK  11:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Controversial figure related to current event. ·¤:•.°windjade.☼°.¤: 19:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC) - yes please protect - hot topic Mosfetfaser (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated edits by socks of TekkenJinKazama (usually IP accounts). Ravensfire (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I've blocked the IP range. Hopefully this stops the user. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:48, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated edits by sock puppets of TekkenJinKazama (usually IP edits). Ravensfire (talk) 02:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I've blocked the IP range. Hopefully this stops the user. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:48, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – This was split out from Module:Video game reviews, which is indefinitely template-protected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. StringTheory11 (t • c) 01:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: A previous 3 month protection that was put in place for the article, which expired on 10 January 2014, has regrettably not stopped the continued vandalization of the article. I have counted up over 10 acts of vandalism since the last protection template expired in January, including one act of grossly offensive vandalism on 17 July 2014. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 22:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 23:21, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

19 July 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting indefinite protection as article continues to be vandalized after being semi-protected temporarily twice. Gparyani (talk) 19:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Spartaz Humbug!

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still a lot of vandalism that appeared as soon as the article became unprotected. It is beyond me why when I requested protection for this page last time, it only received two days time. Clearly that was not enough. Second Skin (talk) 19:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 21:00, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP hopper is repeatedly removing some entries from the list and beggaring about with the alphabetical order. I've no idea why they're removing stuff but since they are all bluelinks and all bear the name "Jadhav", there is no legitimate reason to do so. Sitush (talk) 16:51, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 16:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent addition of actor's name to the article's info box whose roles are unknown for the film, against WP:FILMCAST. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Adding false and speculative information without references.. Damián (talk) 15:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:29, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Insertion of non-pertinent content. To prevent warring over content, especially the history section.

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Diannaa (talk) 04:08, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly-viewed article, brings daily IP vandals/disruptive edits. Article has been blocked for a few months/weeks/days at a time, but issues continue once page goes unprotected. – Recollected • 18:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This should be brought up on the Talk page first. You need to stop removing sourced relevant information from the article to fit your views. --Youngdrake (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

......No words. – Recollected • 01:45, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. By the way, the logs show no record of previous page protection of any duration. Diannaa (talk) 04:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion of unsourced content. RGloucester — ☎ 15:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The edits are not vandalism, merely poorly sourced. Diannaa (talk) 04:19, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Ongoing edit-war between a registered user and an IP user. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One user is blocked (the registered user). Please re-report if the problem resumes when the block expires. Diannaa (talk) 02:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:The Marshall Mathers LP 2 (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps replacing talk page content with main article's content. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 14:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It's a malformed edit request. Please see the article talk page. Diannaa (talk) 03:24, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring by IPs. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:02, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One user is blocked (the registered user). Please re-report if the problem resumes when the block expires. Diannaa (talk) 02:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs and new users keep adding fancruft and vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 04:55, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Chillum (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (2 weeks) tutterMouse (talk) 05:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs from varying locations falsely claiming subject died in Ukraine plane crash. Likely an off-wiki reddit/4chan game. Tarc (talk) 00:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Connormah. Diannaa (talk) 03:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent protection: Persistent vandalism from 4chan users ScottSteiner ✍ 23:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for one week. We don't normally jump to permanent protection, per our open editing policy. Diannaa (talk) 03:55, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. There have been previously been approximately fifteen temporary protection templates for persistent and excessive vandalism on this article. The previous measures have regrettably not stopped the persistent vandalism. Since 1 June 2014, I have counted up over 30 acts of vandalism in the last seven weeks. To have 15 previous protection templates put in place and over 30 acts of vandalism in the last seven weeks is a clear indication that there is a long-term issue with persistent vandalism on this article. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:31, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Diannaa (talk) 03:38, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs from varying locations falsely claiming subject died in Ukraine plane crash. Likely an off-wiki game/target. Tarc (talk) 00:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Connormah. Diannaa (talk) 03:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The history shows edit warring by three single purpose accounts which are surely the same person, being reverted by different editors, as well as IP vandals doing the same. Special:Contributions/Jsnsj, Special:Contributions/Djdjdjhahu, Special:Contributions/Djcjdm, and various IP addresses in the past. Dream Focus 12:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for three days. Diannaa (talk) 03:29, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: See mess on talk page especially Talk:Ansel_Elgort#Removal_of_model_occupation where the current consensus was reached. NeilN talk to me 18:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 02:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism on page that fails per WP:NALBUMS. Requesting protection until album's release date. livelikemusic my talk page! 20:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Snigbrook (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Unprotection: This isn't my main account now but I still watch its talk page, and would like to allow notifications from non-autoconfirmed users. snigbrook (talk) 15:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Diannaa (talk) 03:08, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

20 July 2014

Indefinite semi-protection: User requesting protection in their own userspace. . Vacationlandman (talk) 15:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent changes made by unknown IP. Table structure and frequent misinformation is updated, including bad spelling. Don't want an edit war, as I frequently have to correct the issues. Highway Patrol Vic (talk) 11:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lower to semi-protection: The article has been full-protected for nearly a day. Nyttend noted this WP:ANI discussion in the protection summary; judging by the discussion, it appears to me that the article was full-protected due to edit-warring between a few users, and that there's consensus not to have it full-protected. Nyttend has not responded to my concerns, despite making several major edits since I asked. Heymid (contribs) 17:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. George Ho (talk) 06:43, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:18, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated entry of a copyvio link by new editors. spidy sense tells me that there might be a sock involved but I don't have enough for that. John from Idegon (talk) 00:16, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I have no comment on the validity of the link. However, the addition of a link to copyright material is not prohibited when the link is to the owner of the copyright. If that was the case then a large amount of references would require removing. Example, in the FHS page in the external links section is a link to the FHS webpage and at the bottom of the page is a copyright notice. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – some user in another city has been editing the page for several months now. He has been changing IP's with no accounts or talk pages whatsoever and editing demographics with wrong information when i have clearly cited sources with right information. I am not fully sure but i suspect he has been doing this as a religion-biased behavior. I want to request for permanent protection because i am very sure he won't stop. Wikiboy2364 (talk) 20:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I can definitely see what your talking about, with multiple attempts to change it over the last few months. The problem as I see it is that the edits are pretty infrequent, and there are a decent number of what appear to be good-faith IP edits mixed in. About the only real administrative action I could see being justified might be Pending Changes protection, but I'm even on the fence over whether that is justified. Monty845 21:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP adding copyvio. Multiple time. About three days semi should be enough to convey the message. The Banner talk 10:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP (presumably of the same user) addition of POV pushing sentences in the legacy section of the article. Reversion happening on a daily basis now. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:22, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:46, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP (presumably of the same user) addition of POV pushing sentences in the legacy section of the article. Reversion happening on a daily basis now. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:45, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant low-level vandalism. Ironholds (talk) 02:51, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:43, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Isn't transcluded in the MediaWiki namespace and transclusion count is low enough. —cyberpower ChatOnline 08:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected for a period of forever, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 09:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated blanking by IP's. Page is a frequent target of vandalism. Usually with the same edit summary. I also ask for consideration of indefinite semi-protection as page was protected in May yet the vandals returned. SephyTheThird (talk) 08:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppet's target; check deleted history here and at Power Rangers: Dino Force. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of hell freezes over, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:24, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – The move war began and Komischn (talk · contribs) is the only one who is moving it back to "Di".) Persistent moving over a simple capitalization with basically no RM process. 3 moves in 10 days is enough. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 02:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ged UK. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:03, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Dispute over name of the article. ViperSnake151  Talk  02:03, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note, now called NBCSN Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:30, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Graeme Bartlett. Note that the NBCSN page was protected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – crazy editing without any sources. QED237 (talk) 19:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced edits by multiple IPs in view of transfer speculation on this footballer. Request for one week's PP. Thank you. LRD NO (talk) 12:29, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP hopper, tag, revert, disrupt-only account. . Viriditas (talk) 09:51, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Myx (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: The talk paged has been repeatedly vandalized by a bunch of IP sock of longterm vandal User:Dan Joshua B. Apura. He keeps on adding his hoax version of the Myx article after the main page has been semi protected last month. WayKurat (talk) 05:22, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from a group of IP users who keep adding the word "affluent" to the article. Some editors have offered good reasons not to use "affluent". It's just a silly battle and although I engage, I feel silly for doing it. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:20, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Was a previous problem, that has now re-occurred once previous block expired. DMacks (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple vandalism attempts, especially since the events of Flight 17 on 17 July 2014. DJB3.14 (talk) 23:23, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, At the moment I see more good than bad coming from the IP users. Rjd0060 (talk) 02:28, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Similar type of vandalism by IP users, that led to previous protection. KRIMUK90 ✉ 10:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 05:35, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple accounts have been adding BLP violating text, unreferenced allegations against three named persons. Binksternet (talk) 05:19, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 05:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced content by anon IP editors. PoV marker was re-added everytime it was removed, but no one ever come forward on the talk page to discuss whether and why the neutrality of the article may be in question.

Declined Just six edits since February, and two are completely unrelated; this doesn't yet warrant protection. Nyttend (talk) 22:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: To stop the war that a certain person started against this page. Rolf1981 (talk) 12:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing discussion at the Fringe theory noticeboard. Kleuske (talk) 14:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Kleuske's been edit-warring against multiple users, and protecting right now would have the result of rewarding Kleuske. I've issued a warning for edit-warring and will enforce it with a block if this continues. Nyttend (talk) 22:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Those weren't multiple users, they were Rolf1981. Either admittedly, or passing ducktests with flying colors. Kleuske (talk) 00:24, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tinton5 (talk) 00:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Given the attention from the latest round of conflict, which is resulting in more edits both good and bad, I think the level of vandalism is below the threshold to justify protection at this time. Monty845 21:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism; removal of valid and sourced content; addition of unreliable "source" and "original research" to article. livelikemusic my talk page! 21:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 21:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (Rovinemessage) 17:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continued warring over which colour is "right" and which colour is "wrong". Requesting file to be completely blocked from being reverted, etc. livelikemusic my talk page! 17:06, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please try discussing it with the user first, either on the file talk page or on their user talk page. So far communication has only been via edit summary, and that is never an effective way to settle a dispute. Diannaa (talk) 21:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Various new user socks keep adding the same YouTube video link. . ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 00:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Quick with the new accounts I see. Monty845 00:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Aartao 12:30, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I am afraid you create more disorder than all IPs together for the last month. There were no IP edits for a week.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been attracting vandalism from a couple of new users. Gparyani (talk) 16:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., I also blocked the last user as a vandalism-only account.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors changing his club without a deal made. Kante4 (talk) 15:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 Days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully that will be long enough for this to resolve itself. Monty845 21:23, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful edits being made by IPs that need to be reviewed and corrected. Please protect. JMHamo (talk) 11:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ¼ year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 22:22, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 20:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ¼ year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 22:23, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

21 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism, attempting to show specifications of aircraft fit Russian claims that a Ukrainian Su-25 shot down MH17. Neuro (talk) 17:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Monty845 18:57, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous changing of his club due to speculation without sources, by IPs. '''tAD''' (talk) 15:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:01, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction of semi-protection Page has been under reduction of facts and some vandalism during the last few days. Link-list of discography in the bottom of the page has been completely removed and the introduction is inadequate. Legacy-chapter has been removed almost all relevant facts. Opening the page for editing would help to add relevant information.

Yes, confirm that the page is already protected. I request reduction of the semi-protection.

Declined Please use Talk:Christina Aguilera to explain what you would like to add and gain consensus. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 09:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Various non-constructive edits ranging from unsourced, messing the page. user Bearcat violately has removed Category "Category:24-hour television news channels" from Presstv page. Please Add them to this page. User Randy2063 and user SSZ added unfounded claims,wrong information by adding:" but is said to be close to the country's conservative political faction, especially the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution|elite revolutionary guards". It is not correct. They are giving wrong information. please remove these statements. user SSZ added wrong information and unreliable quotation which is focousing on managemrent. " Its head is appointed directly by the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei." Please Remove that and change to "Presstv management is appointed by Irib management commision. It is not appointed by Islamic republic leader." it is many times added wrong and untrusted information about management of presstv, which are not true but they insist adding them. wrong information are added by Xenophrenic which is targetting its management is as follow, please remove them: "IRIB is independent of the Iranian government, but is said to be close to the country's conservative political faction, especially the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution|elite revolutionary guards. Some media analysts and critics have questioned the purpose and effectiveness of Press TV given the repressive environment towards media. Attempts to establish private, independent media outlets in Iran have been restricted or banned, and Reporters Without Frontiers has declared Iran to have the highest number of jailed journalists in the Middle East. According to the 1979 Iranian Constitution, all broadcasting must exclusively be government-operated, and in 1994 the Islamic state banned the use of satalite television." Please remove this part and change to "Presstv in independant from revolutionary Guard and has independence in it's news mission. " Also Xenophrenic removed a citation from last part of "coverage:". also User Hayek added Unfounded claim, unreliable quotation which is again targetting its management: " its head is appointed directly by the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei" please remove it and change to:"Presstv management is appointed by Irib management commision. It is not appointed by Islamic republic leader." Again recently user Xenophrenic editted and violately removed "Criticism" part from this page.

Please semiprotect this page. RegardsAzirann (talk)

Declined Semi-protecting the page will not hinder the three editors mentioned. Anyway this looks like a content dispute. Also this is not the page to request someone else to make edits for you. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 09:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charoen Pokphand Group

semi-protection: Addition of unverified and highly damaging allegations of links to slavery and murder which are still subject to investigation. CPFGroup (talk) 07:36, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 09:18, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the tournament is over, last but 2 revisions are example of false stats by some IPs. Vin09 (talk) 06:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 09:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous of IP Addresses and users are vandalising Romelu Lukaku article and i would recommend a 30 days temporary page protection. Prince Sulaiman Talk to me 10:36, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Useful additions to this page are very rare. It's a prime target for hoaxes and jokes supported by a false citation. Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Remove protection so that article can be created The protecting admin has been contacted and has replied that they are okay with unprotecting, but cannot do it themselves at this time.__ E L A Q U E A T E 09:08, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a draft version that can be moved there? Helps with unprotection if there's a viable article ready to go. tutterMouse (talk) 09:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I put a draft together here.__ E L A Q U E A T E 11:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done I've moved youor draft over for you. :) GedUK  11:18, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the last day, and especially as of the last few minutes with the conclusion of the British Open of McIlroy winning, the vandalism has picked up on his page. We have needed protection for his page in recent months, and now it looks as though we may need it again. Thank you. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rory_McIlroy&action=history Johnsmith2116 (talk) 17:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. See the section below. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 09:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow moving edit war. One user was brought to ANI with no conclusions, FP will force them to discuss the content. --Mdann52talk to me! 15:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:30, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user keeps on changing genres. He has been warned several times. Could this just be protect for a few days or a week to prevent it please.  — ₳aron 13:12, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

long term semi protection the article has been a long term target of dynamic IP fanboys with no understanding or willingness to follow WP:V / WP:RS / WP:NPOV. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 09:02, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 2 week protection. Vietnam IPs are engaged in a campaign to proliferate a hoax that a Beauty and the Beast animated series will be released in 2015. IPs have submitted this content numerously across various articles, and continue to submit it here. For example [37][38][39] and other articles such as Beauty and the Beast (TV series) and Beauty and the Beast (franchise) and templates such as Template:Beauty and the Beast. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:59, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs adding unofficial club information. 85.240.138.247 (talk) 02:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Much IP vandalism and controversial POV edits. Uishaki (talk) 00:56, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Subject to persistent edit warring over content. Hughpugh 22:31, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I have counted up over 10 acts of vandalism in the last two days alone - 19 July 2014 and 20 July 2014 (UK time). There have previously been 5 temporary protection levels put in place for the article for persistent vandalism and for violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Regrettably these temporary measures have not stopped the persistent vandalism. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 22:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Due to the amount of editing occurring and the quick changing nature of the situation, and the relation to the Palestine/Israel situation, it is important to ensure that accountability is maintained so that the editing does not escalate and encourage Sock-puppetry. As it can be seen in the history, there are a number of edits being made from IP addresses that are either unverified or violate the neutrality of the article. Therefore, I ask that this article please be semi-protected. Jab843 (talk) 18:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Constant addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content by IP users. Aman329 (talk) 16:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:47, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopping editor and IP/registrared editor editing against WP:MOS guideline being reverted by myself and another editor . Murry1975 (talk) 16:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The "myself" editor and the "other" editor are also edit warring. He just wants it all his own way by blocking IPs and leaving it open to him. 86.25.12.125 (talk) 16:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Added the IP hopping editor. Murry1975 (talk) 17:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with semi-protecting this article for a temporary period. The IP is not interested in trying to make a cogent argument, and is obviously a "returned" editor. This topic area suffers from too much disruption as it is. A protection from IP editing would go a long way to helping with the problem. Thank you. -- HighKing++ 19:38, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
These guys are just working together to push their own pov, and the only way they can do that is to block out unregistered users. 86.25.12.125 (talk) 19:45, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Most people call that "consensus". Interesting .. just looking through some of my old files and in fact (ha ha, nearly said facto) I find that your ISP VirginMedia has probably one of the worst records for sock puppets and block-evading editors. Funny that. -- HighKing++ 19:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hilarious. Especially when you consider it's the no.2 in ISP in Britain, with many millions of subscribers. It's bound have "one of the worst records", like it probably has "one of the best" records for good edits. 86.25.12.125 (talk) 20:52, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:41, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Why? can you not see that these editors are a couple of "Republic of Ireland" warriors who want to block out IP editors so they can impose their own pov? This is a content dispute. Semi-protection is not designed for that. 86.25.12.125 (talk) 08:05, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A group of editors have repeatedly removed large sections without discussing on talk page first. Page is under review for merge discussion and needs to stay the way it has been the last 2 years, undisturbed. Please restore version 617789658 first. Please protect until end of merge discussion 25 July. - Technophant (talk) 03:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See also thread at WP:AN3: [40] AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Misuse of page protection to own an article is a serious matter, especially when Technophant is an edit warrior on several fronts. This massive disruption and forum shopping needs to stop.
Admins who are interested in protecting Wikipedia from disruption, please check it out: Technophant (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). -- Brangifer (talk) 03:40, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's one of the users that's edit warring. At least I'm making an attempt to resolve this through discussion. - - Technophant (talk) 03:44, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected - One month per the report at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 04:15, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant disputes regarding the article, especially the section on "Controversies". Vacationlandman (talk) 15:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:31, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Highly Visible. Protect atleast until after most people forget about it. Bobherry talk 14:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very unlikely when the article itself is fully protected, there's enough admin eyes on it to take care of the talkpage until things become settled enough to unprotect. tutterMouse (talk) 15:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done As TutterMouse said, this would be a very bad idea; we never protect talk pages unless people are actively being disruptive, e.g. lots of people are vandalising the talk page itself. Right now, with the talk page being the only place where changes to the article can be discussed, it would be an even worse idea. Nyttend (talk) 19:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

22 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 17:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 14:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – No real reason to change this page in any way. Constant attacking by auto confirmed socks. Grognard 123chess456 (talk) 14:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Already edit-semi-protected for over a month. Bearian (talk) 18:32, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – User keeps adding in material which is uncited and promotional, and another user went to so far as to add a protection template here, even though it didn't do anything (most likely in the belief that it would prevent anyone else from editing). Kevin Rutherford (talk) 15:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., given the previous disruption period which expired a week ago.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:42, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Khan Yunis Camp (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – JA Target. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 10:10, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  11:07, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Edit warring to insert information about an in-house film, supported by no references. Actors in said film are alive, so talking about them is a BLP concern. Binksternet (talk) 04:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protection is also needed at the affected BLPs:
Thanks! Binksternet (talk) 05:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 09:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 16:43, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repead vandalism and addition of spam links. Gparyani (talk) 04:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 09:05, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Subject in question has been involved in a dark scandal, there had been already two vandalism edits.Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 01:05, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:43, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Drive-by vandalism and/or addition of unsourced material by IP users is not frequent, but it is persistent. There are at least as many edits reverted as kept. I leave the duration of the protection to administrative discretion. — Jaydiem (talk) 23:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: There are ongoing and serious BLP issues with this article, as a user is attempting to add claims that this current politician is a convicted criminal without a source and continually trying to place undue weight on the details of his drunk driving charge. I'm politically polar opposite to this politician, but I'm getting tired of repeatedly having to explain Wikipedia's policies on biographies of living persons, reliable sources, and verifiability and getting nowhere - and in the meantime content that is at worst potentially defamatory and at best still a BLP violation needs to stay out of this article. If an admin could protect it on my reduced version I would be grateful. The Drover's Wife (talk) 10:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:15, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Filing this under sockpuppetry because there seem to be a number of IPs and recently created accounts coming back to try to slowly revert a properly referenced controversy section in this article. Ivanvector (talk) 20:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User:Teddybrutus and User:182.23.156.149 have been adding an assertion to this page, repeatedly, that is contradicted by the source they've been providing. —Largo Plazo (talk) 10:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You ought to raise it on the talk page. GedUK  11:14, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 10:18, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On-going edit war which was originally about the date of the founding of the Conservative Party, and has since become about a series of edits, likely made by members of the Conservative Party, which slander the other Parties in the Union and try to make the Conservative Party look good. Likely trying to take advantage of Wikipedia in order to affect this fall's recruit. A clear NPOV violation. Compare, for example, This edit to the current version.

Declined The difference was from four days ago. Current editing appears to be from two editors who are not warring. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:07, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – JA sock target. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 07:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 09:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism. This is an upcoming event. Prevent unregistered users from adding unsourced content and prevent unconstructive edits. BabyIamdaman (talk) 06:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 09:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:ZappaOMati/Archive 3 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection: Like the past two archives, no need to edit an archived page. Zappa24Mati 02:57, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of the end of time, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Increasig of speculation of unregistered users.OscarFercho (talk) 02:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced information after last semi-protection expired. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page protection was lifted on the 19th and IP disruptions began again on the 20th. Article was also protected for a bit back in June. Vandals seem intent to disrupt, for example here (please note my edit summary). Requesting longer-term protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced edits and vandalism by multiple IPs with recent transfer speculation of this footballer. Request for one week's PP. Thank you. LRD NO (talk) 00:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:38, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 23:31, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect as there are a lot of unsourced BLP violations being added that need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 22:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:19, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and ongoing efforts from several IPs to reintroduce the term "hoax" or "hoax artist." This BLP article addresses how her work has been denounced as pseudoscience but for the some reason that's not enough. "Hoax" is not a NPOV term for what she does -- as has been explained on the article talk page. Repeatedly reverting this has become a waste of time and this is tailor-made for temporary protection from IP editors, I believe. . Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism related to current news item. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Merge dispute/warring. User merged the page with Frame language despite disagreement with the merge, and continues to claim there was no disagreement despite the talk page. Augur (talk) 18:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The dispute needs more input. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:43, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been a series of edits based on transfer speculation between Swansea City and Tottenham Hostpur, without any confirmation from either sides official sites. Boddefan2009 (talk) 18:01, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism, insulting posts and changing of the club and biography. Tdiamantidis (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing EW without consensus first. Discretionary sanctions probably appropriate. MrBill3 (talk) 14:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems very likely this will resolve itself via a topic ban. I suggest waiting to see how that discussion turns out. Monty845 16:24, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Topic ban was enacted, so I'm marking this not done for the bot. If the remaining participants on the page resume edit warring, feel free to resubmit. Monty845 21:08, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock or meat, but party affiliates do try to edit this alot, reverted one who immediately posted a coi edit notice on the talkpage after the edit. Murry1975 (talk) 14:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:10, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Your proposed edit on the talk page is about the very subject that got the page protected in the first place. Monty845 19:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

23 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Roxy the dog (resonate) 15:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days. Tiptoety talk 17:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: removal of Files and reverting article rapidly . Eshwar.omTalk tome 08:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your page-protection request is just to stop Redtigerxyz (talk · contribs) from editing the article. That's no reason for requesting protection and it probably isn't useful either as he would be still able to edit it with semi-protection on. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This is a content dispute. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 13:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

Temporary semi-protection: High level of file removing,content ,citation removing. Eshwar.omTalk tome 09:32, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Same comment as stated for Vishnu above. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This is a content dispute. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 13:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Jesper Olsen (runner) (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Major Edit War Currently going on. Bobherry talk 13:57, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And I've blocked the IP as well. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Lots of IP vandalism that goes on periodically on this page. Please semi-protect for around one month at least. Hooverplant (talk) 11:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 13:36, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PC 1: Ongoing, slow but long term and persisting addition of non-encyclopedic material (speculative, game-guide, in-universe) by drive-by fans who do not engage on article talk. PC1 would allow for a measure of filtering while being less drastic on enthusiastic editors than semi-protection. Can't do it myself due to editing the article. MLauba (Talk) 11:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 13:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of disruptive IP edits. JMHamo (talk) 10:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 13:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Edit warring or removal of content. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 13:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs and new users repeatedly adding spam links as 'references', --. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 13:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Constant blanking, removal of information, vandalism, etc. by sunni heretics who want to suppress information contradicting their religious beliefs. IsLioTr (talk) 20:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unconstructive edits from IPs lately (mostly one IP hopper who keeps showing up once a month). —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unexplained removal of relevant, cited information by IP. --ThylekShran (talk) 07:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask why? The IP's just gonna come back and remove the info again. :( --ThylekShran (talk) 08:20, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. What I missed was that there were two IPs, probably the same person, and thus were not going to see your note on their talk page. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. There were actually three IPs, all starting with 188.174; I left my note on the talk page of the IP that had edited most recently and most frequently. I also left a note on the article's talk page. Didn't know how else to try to reach the IP. Anyways, thanks for protecting the page! :) --ThylekShran (talk) 08:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. Jim1138 (talk) 05:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Connormah. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism after previous semi expired. Qxukhgiels (talk) 17:17, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalized repeatedly by IP range. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:10, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry talk 01:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 22:39, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent removal of mention of materially impactful arrest of the founder and chief executive of a public company. This is relevant information related to a materially impactful adverse event for the business and can be externally verified by numerous news sources. 67.177.251.241 (talk) 21:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A 14-day protection recently expired and IP user has made massive numerical changes with no explanation or source in this edit. Vandal(s) had previously attacked the four main articles (main article + S1, S2, and S3) and I had to ask for protection across all of them. I think that might be warranted again if he's going to start this nonsense again. Requesting protection for longer than 2 weeks please. Thanks, . Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:34, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:57, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dekabreak101 (talk) 19:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:03, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent stream of IP vandalism, mostly extremely childish allegations of homosexuality between subject (WP:BLP) and who I can only assume is an enemy of said IP. '''tAD''' (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 22:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Only being kept for its revision history. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:30, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of life, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent upswing in unconstructive edits. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:45, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A new user and his IP address keeps on deleting content from this article and moves it in a fork article without proper explanation on what happened. The user and his sock IP address even posted expletives in Filipino that his edits should not be touched. -WayKurat (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:42, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been subject to vandalism from IP addresses. I request temporary semi-protection for this article. JC · Talk · Contributions 22:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I'm surprised this wasn't already in semi status given recent events. I made the same change for Alexander Borodai and Buk missile system for the same reason. Many other related pages are already in semi status due to edit warring and organized political efforts. Hiberniantears (talk) 22:31, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done (For the bot.) Mike V • Talk 22:45, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: repeated antisemitic pov-pushing by banned user:Mikemikev. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a month by Dougweller. Mike V • Talk 22:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP advertizing repeatedly reinstated. "This Blu-ray Player Software is also a great choice for you." Algr (talk) 18:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 22:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly recreated page. Tchaliburton (talk) 20:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by Bearian. Mike V • Talk 22:18, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Persistently recreated advertisement. Also, Carbon tracker initiative. Qxukhgiels (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Bearian (talk) 18:38, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:MirrorFreak (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Just because I don't want the possibility of having a user mess up my page. Mirror Freak 13:07, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. If you know of a specific IP threat, or you are going on vacation ('wikibreak'), please explain. Bearian (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

24 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip vandalism. nableezy - 19:58, 24 July 2014 (UTC) 19:58, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by NawlinWiki. Diannaa (talk) 21:18, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Daily sock puppet vandalism by blocked editor of a BLP article. Dan56 (talk) 19:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 21:36, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There apparently is some reverting cycle going on here. Not that is something serious, but it can damage the article's stability, which is currently an FA candidate.--Retrohead (talk) 11:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 21:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. VQuakr (talk) 07:16, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a month by JamesBWatson. Mike V • Talk 20:18, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editor repeatedly inserting BLP-violating text asserting financial misdealings against named persons Rex and Keiko Ziac, without supporting reference. Binksternet (talk) 04:53, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. for one month. It's a single, static, IP that's doing this, after several previous blocks for the same. Semi seems overkill. Bishonen | talk 05:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Semi Protection"

Note: I've dropped a message on the user's page for clarification. Mike V • Talk 02:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Handled on talk page. Mike V • Talk 11:47, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-Protection: Persistent vandalism. Blanking of the page or its sections, misinformation being added, including personal opinions or factually incorrect edits being made due to the article contradicting their religious beliefs. IsLioTr (talk 22:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 03:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-Protection: Persistent vandalism. Blanking of the page or its sections, misinformation being added, including personal opinions or factually incorrect edits being made due to the article contradicting their religious beliefs. IsLioTr (talk 22:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 03:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-Protection: Persistent vandalism. Blanking of the page or its sections. Personal opinions or factually incorrect edits being made due to the article contradicting their religious beliefs. Blanking with claims of no citations, even when there are citations. IsLioTr (talk 22:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 03:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP changing vandal. I dream of horses (T) @ 00:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 3 days by Foxj. Mike V • Talk 02:55, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandal changing IPs. I dream of horses (T) @ 00:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 3 days by Nick. Mike V • Talk 02:55, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP is edit warring on the specs of the airplane. McSly (talk) 21:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 Days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Monty845 22:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent modification of referenced text. Götz (talk) 23:32, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I was the only editor on my side of a two sided dispute. I've supplied a source of information as requested by the opposing parties. I expect that will lead to the end of the matter now. Ghostofthelandscape (talk) 08:56, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Discuss with the protecting admin first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

25 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amortias (T)(C) 17:52, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:03, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: High level of IP vandalism and vandalism by new users to avoid current protection level. Daan0001 (talk) 16:00, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protection has been removed; the page is too busy for that to work well. Full protection is unneccessary at this time. Diannaa (talk) 17:13, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent adding of spam, false information and vandalism. Skr15081997 (talk) 12:13, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protection has been removed; the page is too busy for that to work well. Diannaa (talk) 17:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors changing his club without a deal made. Kante4 (talk) 12:03, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Ged UK. Diannaa (talk) 16:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Uber fan going on adding self-owned fan website for false sales claim. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 14:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Semi priotection won't stop an editor with 700 edits. Have to take action against them individually GedUK  11:44, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is being edited by IP addresses. Though the edits look good faith to me, they are usually unsourced and no explanations are ever given in the edit summary. It'd be better if these guys make their requests on the talkpage instead of having to revert edits everytime. Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:06, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:02, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Teukros (talk) 14:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  11:17, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Semi Protection as my co-authors are new users and unable to edit the page.

Unprotected Mike V • Talk 14:32, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – It was speculated she was on board of the Air Algérie Flight 5017 flight, but she later denied such information. Up to now several IP users have included that and/or said she died. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 23:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit count is too high for pending, it'll have to be semi. GedUK  12:51, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Persistent vandalism - after the first series of IP vandalism the page was semi-protected on July 21st, but the editor logged in as User:Roby Iliescu and continued his disruptive editing. On July 23rd the semi-protection expired and, in spite of warnings [41] [42], he started vandalizing the article again via an anonymous IP (he is altering an info taken from an official site). See details at User_talk:Legoktm#Vandalism_.28again.29_at_CS_Universitatea_Craiova_.28football.29 79.117.156.114 (talk) 21:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:49, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of disruptive edits now (mostly AGF) but page is getting full of incorrect edits. and always edit conflicts. QED237 (talk) 20:05, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:22, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful IP edits that will need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 18:45, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:17, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Next surge of floating IPs of an alleged ancestor of Ungern-Sternberg‎‎ -No.Altenmann >t 03:54, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:38, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 15:47, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. GedUK  12:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced speculation and disruption by IP users '''tAD''' (talk) 13:21, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:38, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently some IP users are vandalising the page. Rameshnta909 (talk) 13:44, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 21:16, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Pszczolka Maja1 sock target. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 10:31, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:22, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: In the past few days there's been a rash of WP:BLP violations on this article, as well as additions of unsourced material or material not supported by the sources.Bbb23 (talk) 01:10, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. In regards to the recent issue, the article is now adequately sourced with reliable references. If things get out of hand, feel free to relist. Mike V • Talk 23:53, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:20, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism on this page recently. Mirror Freak 19:22, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 23:18, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Want to create a page for the the Former Governor of Punjab from 4 May 1964 to 1 September 1965. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please discuss with the protecting admin first. Mike V • Talk 20:20, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UNPROTECT Page protection was clearly requested by a bad faith editor trying to win a content dispute by abuse. 76.31.236.94 (talk) 21:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request is that it NOT be protected because the protection is in bad faith for the purpose of "winning" a content dispute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.236.94 (talk) 03:16, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Please discuss with protecting admin first. Mike V • Talk 20:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Once again, not long after coming off page protection for the exact same reason, this article is being subject to gross and obvious copyright violations with the information taken directly from [43] as can be seen in this edit. SQGibbon (talk) 17:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 21:48, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism edit linked to Game of Thrones subreddit frontpage. Silvrous Talk 10:09, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 21:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent anonymous vandalism w ideological bent for whatever reason. Evenrød (talk) 09:44, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 21:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized by a succession of newly-registered single-purpose users, among others. Please protect for a significantly long duration. Hertz1888 (talk) 09:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Articles are typically not full-protected because of vandalism. Diannaa (talk) 21:53, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism over the past day or so. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 22:01, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

26 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect due to a lot of unsourced changes being made due to media coverage. JMHamo (talk) 15:22, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 19:36, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been adding unsourced crap for the past week or so despite everyone reverting, I was hoping they'd stop but it doesn't look that way, Thanks. –Davey2010 • (talk) 14:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.; also blocked one IP per WP:3RR for 24 hours Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 19:32, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant thanks for your help :) –Davey2010 • (talk) 19:34, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced additions and general disruption by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 06:21, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Two months due to unsourced changes by IPs. Trap (music) is a music genre. EdJohnston (talk) 19:31, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruption/ edit warring by anon IP editors.AbramTerger (talk) 13:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Unless you would like to go to full protection. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 14:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Due to Abby Martin's criticism of Israel in the ongoing conflict, her biography is receiving lots of BLP violating edits on both sides from IPs and new accounts. Viriditas (talk) 06:59, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 18:21, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes. Bobherry talk 04:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 15:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant edit warring by users User:Rihannathebestlikeher, User:HackneyE8, and IP addresses 183.171.171.217 and 93.186.23.82 after several reverts. IPadPerson (talk) 13:53, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 14:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Edit warring Jim1138 (talk) 10:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 14:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 07:16, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 14:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A dispute between BigKtheboss and Farrahferguson over the notability of mentioning Ego's daughter, Farrah (possible COI) has been arising lately. Zappa24Mati 03:07, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I've warned them, if they continue please report them for edit warring. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: GO's user page is being messed with by a rotating series of IPs. GO is probably offline or they would have protected it on their own. If the IP has stopped by the time you get to this then so much the better. If not a few hours is probably all that is needed. MarnetteD|Talk 22:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like they've stopped. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:55, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request unprotection. The editor who restored the primary/poor sources is topic banned. QuackGuru (talk) 17:25, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Ask the protecting admin first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:39, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:EdJohnston, I request unprotected for the reasons stated above. QuackGuru (talk) 04:39, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected - Now unprotected per your request. EdJohnston (talk) 12:42, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unencyclopedic or disruptive content by anons and possible sockpuppets of a particular problem user. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:35, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 03:55, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large number of IP addresses making constant changes that are not constructive and are often reverted by other editors. --Warner REBORN (talk) 09:25, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 03:53, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism lately. Hafspajen (talk) 04:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 03:31, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – This template is substituted onto someone's talk page every time a reviewer at Articles for Creation declines a pending submission. APerson (talk!) 23:05, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined A borderline case, however templates like {{uw-vandalism1}} are only semi'd and this Afc decline looks to be maintained by a user without template editor rights. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Two users in particular have deleted information from the this article, one deleted links and the other summary information. User:PELeonard (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) PELeonard (talk) 20:34, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:02, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of vandalism. Neøn (talk) 08:59, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User has not re-inserted his edit since he was warned of Arbcom restriction s on this topic. Please re-report if the situation changes. Diannaa (talk) 16:49, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Update: user is now blocked. -- Diannaa (talk) 02:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and Users have been vandalizing here for the past few weeks. Bobherry talk 03:59, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. StringTheory11 (t • c) 04:17, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations regarding whether or not Lepore is a rapist. See, for example, here where I addressed the matter on User:Chiiidog74's talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 03:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. StringTheory11 (t • c) 04:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP with no intention of continuing to discuss at article talk page (WP:POINT). Continued edit warring by same IP. Took to WP:ANI, warned IP of 3RR. 68.119.73.36 (talk) 21:31, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 04:19, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Content dispute with newly-registered user(s). --ThomasO1989 (talk) 20:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 04:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Longtime rotating IP vandal resuming attacks/slander against the mother of the article subject and those who remove the PA's; already protected twice because of this. Nate • (chatter) 19:02, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 04:07, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and dubious unsourced changes by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 18:20, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 04:04, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute with IP who persistently who keeps changing the lead. Erick (talk) 17:11, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 04:00, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued removal of "YouTube" entry, and continous changes of PewDiePie to Music (which is psuedo-channel by YouTube) by Gottafanbrba. I had been bored because of this, requesting indef semi-protection. SMB99thx XD 06:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 03:47, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 04:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 03:37, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 04:03, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 03:29, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Page currently has pending changes protection but that hasn't stopped people from attempting to add unsourced content to the page. This page has also had multiple instances of time based semi-protection of increasing lengths (the most recent being two months) Palmtree5551 (talk) 00:29, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's increased recently, but otherwise pending changes is doing its job. I've watchlisted the page and I'll semi it if we get to that point. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:52, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I noticed hovering over the lock showed that the expiry date was some date within the past week or two and checking the page source showed an old instance of a page protection template which I removed Palmtree5551 (talk) 03:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes privilege by anon IP editors on a BLP. STATic message me! 04:02, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:16, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please semi-protect this article for two weeks at least. We need to have someone review these IP edits. There is persistent vandalism which needs to be detered. The live show has not even happened yet and people are making false predictions. I would like this to stop, either by a week of semi-protection or pending changes. . ~~JHUbal27 00:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 03:23, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Grossly insulting, degrading BLP violations and potentially libelous material. The reason for this request is not due to a large amount of recent vandalism (although the article did previously suffer from persistent long-term vandalism). Since the article was changed to "Pending changes protection" in November 2013, the vandalism has been sporadic and infrequent. However, I am concerned that grossly insulting, degrading BLP violations are still being put into the article. Such material was put into the article, for example, on 22 July 2014 (UK time) and on 3 June 2014. A view of the public logs shows that a number of changes to the visibility of revisions have had to be made due to such material. Regrettably, there still continues to be such grossly insulting and degrading material being put into the article. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:52, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 03:20, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Always vandalised by multiple IP users. Reverted by User:ClueBot NG on a average of every week or two. DSCrowned (talk) 12:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm going to give pending changes on this a try. Edit count is low and vandalism is infrequent and lumpy, so I think a long PC would be more effectinve than a short semi. Also, it's Plagiarism that I've protected, not the redicrect. GedUK  11:32, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That was for a different article and not this report. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 03:13, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:10, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 03:13, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent WP:Disruptive editing, perhaps WP:Vandalism as well, and certainly WP:Edit warring; all of this is primarily due to an IP-hopper. One of his IPs were recently blocked. Flyer22 (talk) 23:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this Black Kite. It looks like Talk:List of association football teams to have won four or more trophies in one season needs long-term semi-protection as well. Flyer22 (talk) 23:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Article: Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Talk page: Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent and repeated removal of referenced material over the past year from this article by several anonymous or new editors. Warnings to these users have been ignored. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 21:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of anon vandalism, please protect. JMHamo (talk) 20:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Additions of dubious unsourced content and speculation to a BLP by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 17:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:04, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple editors attacking page. Amortias (T)(C) 17:36, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Shirik. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:07, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous unsourced material posted by IPs. Nahnah4 | Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! | No Editcountitis! 10:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ged UK. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 02:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent vandalism and deliberate edit warring from Albokid007 (talk · contribs), Italy86 (talk · contribs), Biar122 (talk · contribs), and Arb12345 (talk · contribs), believed to be one and the same person.--Zoupan 00:33, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism due to the crisis over there. . Tinton5 (talk) 22:56, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of inaccurate info being added to this BLP article that needs reviewing/restoring. Please protect. JMHamo (talk) 22:14, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:47, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent 4chan related vandalism from anonymous IPs. SirLorax (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

27 July 2014

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Socking attempt by a banned user to create their preferred version of the Fazlur Khan article here instead (the main article being protected). No reason that this article should ever be anything other than a redirect to the subject's more common name. McGeddon (talk) 18:12, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --j⚛e deckertalk 18:18, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP users are vandalising the page repeatedly. Rameshnta909 (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --j⚛e deckertalk 18:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High-profile footballer. Recently protected for a week and then two weeks, which just expired. Edits since then have returned to back-&-forth between vandalism and reverts of same. I expect vandalism will die down once transfer period ends (Sept 1) or if player actually changes teams. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:17, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 36 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --j⚛e deckertalk 18:20, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced edits by multiple IPs over transfer speculation on this footballer. Request for one week's PP. Thank you. LRD NO (talk) 15:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some short-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:04, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism to a BLP. STATic message me! 05:55, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 23:14, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --j⚛e deckertalk 17:59, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There has been persistent vandalism coming from unregistered users; these users would put in programs that never aired on the station and either I or Cyphoidbomb would remove the postings and send the user a warning. I just came on here and reverted more vandalism edits (people who post shows that never aired on Treehouse TV). Some of these edits would be good faith, while others, particularly edits from one IP Address, "67.71.52.183", have been reverted, the user of that IP address has been warned, the user was blocked for a short period of time and is now unblocked. Other IP address users have been vandalizing as well, see this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Treehouse_TV&diff=prev&oldid=618447821 Another example of users vandalizing this page is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Treehouse_TV&diff=prev&oldid=618368805

Certain users have been reminded numerous times to stop vandalizing or else they will be blocked yet they continue to do so even after they are blocked and their block is up.

I think the only way we will be able to fix this/reduce the chances of this article being vandalized more is to put a semi-protection on it. Ziva 84 (talk) 21:02, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 13:54, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  NQ  talk 10:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Three months. Some edit summaries have been revision-deleted by other admins due to bad language. EdJohnston (talk) 13:49, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There is an ongoing storm of BLP vandalism against this article; one edit called him “the most hated man in Australia tonight”. At least one account, User:Iloveyoupeter, seems to have been created as a WP:SPA just to vandalize this article.  Unician ∇  12:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:42, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User requesting a page protection in his own userspace. Vacationlandman (talk) 09:59, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:45, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – User is blocked for sockpuppetry and anonymous users keep blanking it. ~Frosty (Talk page) 02:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:41, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Seen in highly visited articles, like McDonald's. Maybe also semi-protection; there has been vandalism this year. George Ho (talk) 19:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What page move vandalism? The other sort of vandalism is pretty infrequent. tutterMouse (talk) 19:14, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oops... I meant "highly visible template". --George Ho (talk) 19:30, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:44, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Sylvester Stallone (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Disruption by IP hopper. NeilN talk to me 02:50, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 02:58, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Skyler Page (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection: Constant stream of IP editing to include allegations of sexual assault committed by the subject, even though this is prohibited per WP:BLPCRIME. 23W 01:38, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Indefinitely semi-protected. Acroterion (talk) 03:01, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A redirect has been created but JajaDSeries (talk · contribs) keeps reverting and adding unverifiable (and unlikely) information into the article.--Jetstreamer Talk 15:59, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: JajaDSeries (talk · contribs) blocked by Black Kite. (semi-protection wouldn't have helped here). Miniapolis 00:10, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Markschultzy (talk) 21:34, 26 July 2014 (UTC) This article: "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Schultz_(wrestler)&gettingStartedReturn=true" has been persistently vandalized changing the ACCOMPLISHMENTS section here: "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Schultz_(wrestler)&action=edit&section=6&editintro=Template:BLP_editintro" , the MIXED MARTIAL ARTS section here: "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Schultz_(wrestler)&action=edit&section=5&editintro=Template:BLP_editintro" ,as well as the template heading here: "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Schultz_(wrestler)&action=edit&editintro=Template:BLP_editintro". I want to be the only one authorized to edit this page as it's about me. My true Mixed Martial Arts record is 1-0-0 http://www.mixedmartialarts.com/f/E3633095277D3DC9/Mark-Schultz/[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Further, the most recent IP edits appeared to edit in the way that the user desires. User has also been advised about the conflict of interest guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 22:37, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon who changes addresses removing maintenance templates. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:34, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2602:30a:2cf0:550::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Shirik. Disruptive addresses are all in that range. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 19:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users are vandalising the page repeatedly. Rameshnta909 (talk) 16:45, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Consider pending changes if vandalism persists at a low rate, but as it stands now, unless it's protected for months, protection wouldn't do much. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 19:39, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After unprotection editors again vandalizing the article and adding unsourced stuff about him moving. Kante4 (talk) 19:43, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 19:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC protection is ineffective on preventing frequent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 18:24, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 19:47, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP and new editor edit-warring the appropriate pronouns to use. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:05, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Two months. IPs have been edit warring about gender pronouns. Use the talk page to make your case. EdJohnston (talk) 21:52, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

28 July 2014

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Adabow (talk) 20:42, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
I'm not sure pending changes will help on this, so I've gone with semi-protection. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP and new editors over the last couple weeks, especially over the lead. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of uncited matter, specially in education section. The herald 13:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mike V • Talk 14:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An anonymous user edit wars and refuses to discuss. Also adds The Huffington Post which is not an RS.--Mishae (talk) 14:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Mike V • Talk 15:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by various IPs. the article requires protection in this phase as many new users and IPs are making test edits. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  12:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrade to pending changes protection This page is already semi protected, and there is still vandalism coming to the page (ie this, consistently). Full protection would be too much, given the article it is, but something else needs to be done to prevent this. Possibly a block for that user? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Pending changes is a lower form of protection than semi, as anyone can edit, just not all edits can show, whereas semi only registred editors can edit. Full protection would indeed be overkill. Action against the user in question is the best route. They need to be warned propperly first, then reported to WP:AIV. GedUK  11:57, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Rameshnta909 (talk) 18:38, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  11:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is clearly being vandalised regularly by persons who know the subject personally. Mpjmcevoybeta (talk) 11:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:24, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unencyclopedic content by IPs. Blake Gripling (talk) 15:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, It's one IP, overkill to protect the article in this case. Engage with them or report as necessary to WP:AIV or WP:3RRN. GedUK  11:31, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism, unsourced additions and WP:OR by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 05:57, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  11:30, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring, possible sock puppetry. 26oo (talk) 01:37, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  11:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated namecrufting by IPs. John from Idegon (talk) 08:44, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  NQ  talk 08:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. GedUK  12:02, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Low intensity edit warring since months: IPS inserts unsourced info about genealogy of Suleiman. Alex2006 (talk) 04:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:08, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Player rumoured to changed club, IP come and add speculation. QED237 (talk) 00:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:51, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be persistent socking with regards to the game's closure and whether it will be brought back. Adaptations of 'realms' can be seen in the talk page. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fun_Realms Tutelary (talk) 00:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:50, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – There has only been one single useful edit since January 2014. The rest were vandalism and corresponding reverts. This template is matured to the point that it does not need to be recurrently changed and it is safe to assume that a TE protection will not reduce productivity. Codename Lisa (talk) 03:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The template only has 32 transclusions. I don't believe that is enough to qualify as a highly visible template for template protection. Mike V • Talk 04:02, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'Indefinite semi-protection Persistent vandalism from an anonymous, IP-hopping vandal constantly inserting blatantly incorrect information. Vandal has returned from a hiatus, under a new IP, to begin its disruptive behavior anew.--Mr Fink (talk) 23:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing efforts by IP's to record article space edits for "posterity.". VQuakr (talk) 23:20, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:45, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Boddefan2009 (talk) 22:49, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I've also blocked the user. GedUK  11:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: High level violations NPOV, V, No Personal Attacks. Contentious lawsuit, citations to one of the party’s blogs/websites (Novella), and his associate’s blogs/websites (Barrett). Personal attack 618360327. Rjwrjw100 (talk) 22:35, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This article is high-profile, and a very controversial subject area. We've had repeated IP vandalism for days. A notable incident just broke out a few minutes ago. I think applying PC protection might be best for this article. It would allow us to maintain the flow of good IP edits, as there have been some, but also stem the tide of obviously disruptive vandals. Please consider it. RGloucester — ☎ 21:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I support pending changes here as well, this is a sensitive topic and given the vandalism I think it is for the best. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support – This article is too vulnerable at the moment, so it would be preferable to have pc protection. At least IP editors could still help that way. Dustin (talk) 21:35, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This article has been subject to a surge of vandalism that is being very hard to control.Mondolkiri1 (talk) 22:03, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit count is way too high for PC to be effective, there'd be far too much reviewing required. GedUK  11:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring again. Jnorton7558 (talk) 01:35, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism from IPs and new accounts. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:37, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Diannaa. Mike V • Talk 04:02, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – 69 transclusions, and Burger King is a well-known company. George Ho (talk) 20:31, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I would disagree that 69 transclusions is considered a highly visible template. Most templates that fall under that category have thousands of transclusions. In addition, there hasn't been any vandalism to the template in the past couple of years that would warrant protection. Mike V • Talk 01:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I want to create a disamg page.Note it has been protected since 2010 and many of the protecting admins are inactive. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:17, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The most recent protecting admin is Seraphimblade, a sitting arbitrator who made an edit less than 24 hours ago. Please discuss it on his talk page first. Mike V • Talk 01:53, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I know that under WP:OWN, I don't "own" this page, but I'm requesting that this page be protected because it is in my userspace. . Vacationlandman (talk) 01:51, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mike V • Talk 03:55, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page has been recreated by same author 7 times in under 24 hours. Think its in need of salting to prevent the author recreating. Amortias (T)(C) 21:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by Randykitty. Mike V • Talk 23:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – 8,000+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 20:50, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Mike V • Talk 23:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I allow any editor to copy material from this page but modifications are not permitted. Jetstreamer Talk 21:40, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mike V • Talk 22:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I allow any editor to copy material from this page to use in a number of airline-related articles, but modifications are not permitted. Jetstreamer Talk 21:39, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Mike V • Talk 22:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Consistent level of IP vandalism, BLP. Musicandnintendo (talk) 16:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dispute resolution on inclusion of the term 'rolling coal' to the definitions of disambiguation items. Richard416282 (talk) 21:36, 26 July 2014 (UTC

Note Richard416282 is edit warring and is misindentifying good faith reverts as vandalism after being told not to. --NeilN talk to me 21:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Use the talk page. If edit warring continues temporary full protection may be warranted. Report to WP:AN3 if need be. — MusikAnimal talk 18:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

29 July 2014

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Spam links were added by IPs in the past, started again. Vin09 (talk) 09:28, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. THere's been plenty of constructive, or at least good fait IP edits as well, and so far only one piece of spam. PC seems a better way forward at this stage. --GedUK  11:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: This page is very important and should be fully protected. Gerry.y.ma (talk) 05:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please read the protection policy, this request doesn't show why the page meets the requirements for protection (see WP:FULL). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:25, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: An unlogged editor insists on changing the demographics section. A 5 day semi protection may cool things down and convince him to use the correspondent talkpage.Alexikoua (talk) 16:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, At this point, the only protection I see that would be fair would be full protection. This looks like a content dispute at this stage. You should start the conversation on the talk page. At the moment, it's just you and an IP who are disagreeing over sources. GedUK  11:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unsourced/poorly sourced additions from IP editors. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 05:31, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:40, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Player has been in the news lately for various reasons. There is reports he is going to play in Greece but there is nothing confirmed by either Tigres or Olympiacos. . GoPurple'nGold24 03:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:38, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Huge edit war going back days involving a host of IPs and a couple users. Lock this until folks dispute is resolved. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 01:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:36, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Huge edit war going back days involving a host of IPs and a couple users. Lock this until folks dispute is resolved. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 01:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:34, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism by several users and IP addresses. IPadPerson (talk) 00:28, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long story short (you can read the longer version on the article's talk page and here), previously information was added about an article/review Alexander wrote under a pseudonym. Alexander came on and contested the addition of the information and WP:BLPN decided that the info shouldn't be included as it posed a BLP issue. Since then the info has been re-added by IPs and now a new account. The page has been protected in the past over edit warring, so a longer temporary semi protection would be a good idea here. I'd also suggest adding the option to have changes need to be vetted by an admin rather than have them added by any new account. I'd protect it myself except that I'm somewhat involved with everything and I'd like to avoid any complaints of a COI since I was involved in the debate. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:55, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 23:19, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP user(s) who will not join a discussion on the Talk page. Nick Number (talk) 20:53, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Saw this on RC patrol. Slow moving disruption, but given the IP's comments on the talk page, not likely to resolve itself without some intervention here. Just have a look at the history for this year. Semi-prot is probably fine, but the duration should be several months at minimum, or until said IPs engage in meaningful discussion. Electric Wombat (talk) 22:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes privilege by anon IP editors and new users. STATic message me! 19:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I left pending on so that will cover it when semi finishes. Edit count is a little high at the moment for PC, but the semi may well stop that. The user involved will be confirmed shortly, so action might be needed against them. I've given them a level 3 warning. GedUK  11:15, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent actitivty on this article has been to smear the person in the article, without any references. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 04:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:30, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I ask that the semi-protection be re-instated indefinitely as it hasn't been more than a few hours and already anonymous IP addresses are making a number of edits that are reversing some of the gains what we have worked so hard in achieving both neutrality and readability. Please extend the period, and only reconsider lifting it a few weeks after the conflict has concluded. Thanks!. Jab843 (talk) 17:17, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not prepared to go indefinite as a first protection. Let's give it a couple of weeks and see where we are. GedUK  11:09, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi- or pending changes protection: Frequent target for IP vandalism. Has had numerous edits with no changes since February, most of which were IP edits or reversions thereof. Also, of the last 500 edits, roughly a quarter are reversions, though not all are necessarily for vandalism. – RobinHood70 talk 16:42, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Tom Morris: ^ Mike V • Talk 23:54, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Mike V—sorted it out. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article was recently protected for 7 days because Vietnam-based IPs continue to perpetuate a hoax about a 2015 Beauty and the Beast series. Almost as soon as the block expired, a Vietnam IP started up with the hoax again in these edits. User keeps hopping IPs, which makes any sort of block on the IP side difficult. Requesting longer protection, please. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: They were six incorrect edits by various users since yesterday (27 July 2014). Costa played & scored in a pre-season friendly match against Olimpija, but it doesn't count as a league match. However, people think this match counts & constantly makes bad edits. What is more, the player currently plays for Chelsea, which can make him a target for some rival supporters from Arsenal, Manchester United & other teams, especially when the league will start. The last (and probably) worst thing is that he was born in Brazil, but he chose to play for the Spanish international team. This made him a number one enemy in Brazil. I don't see Diego Costa's page being in a lesser risk than Ashley Cole or even Neymar. User:BartSmith

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Doesn't need full protection where only admins can edit, semi will do. Let's try 6 months, but I suspect that it'll end up indef after that. GedUK  11:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

30 July 2014

Semi-protection: Abuse of pending changes privilege by anon IP editors and new users. BLP violations. STATic message me! 17:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:39, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring between anonymous users. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 15:14, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 3 days by C.Fred. Mike V • Talk 19:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (t) Josve05a (c) 14:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 2 days by Callanecc. Mike V • Talk 19:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism shortly before the film's release Richiekim (talk) 11:42, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: heavy ip editing in regards to trade rumors involving him. 1966batfan (talk) 06:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Don't go Jon! GedUK  13:47, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Transcluded by 400+ file pages. George Ho (talk) 05:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, 468 is nowhere near high translusion levels, there's only been one edit in the last 18 months. GedUK  13:25, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Today's featured article under attack by vandals. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, It's passed now GedUK  13:21, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:K6ka/Archive 5 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: User request within own userspace. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 12:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Editor(s) appears to be logging out to edit war over an extended period.CFredkin (talk) 05:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:29, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: How about three months relief from the school kids? This month (diff) there have been 41 edits by 20 users with little benefit. Johnuniq (talk) 04:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 3 months is a bit long for a first protection (well, first in several years). GedUK  13:23, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Immediate high level of vandalism by anon IP editors and new users following the end of the recent protection period. STATic message me! 14:45, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:17, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection: Numerous IP addresses keep incorrectly changing transfers and player numbers despite messages explaining not to and why not to. Lukejordan02 (talk) 12:45, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As a major contributor to this article, I wholeheartedly agree with this request. It's terribly frustrating to have put messages in comment tags and on talk pages, only for anonymous editors to come along and ignore the messages because they think they know better. – PeeJay 13:41, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:14, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Numerous IP addresses (same guy) keep incorrectly changing the article to a copy of other articles content (like Portuguese District First Levels. This IP's are making vandalism in more articles (like Double (association football)). Rpo.castro (talk) 17:38, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:15, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from users who are trying to cover up a point that they do not agree with. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:43, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Let's see if autoblock takes care of it. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:42, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Numerous IP addresses keep on making inaccurate changes to the page.--TerryAlex (talk) 20:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Multiple anonymous editors constantly adding song names on the list of episodes. WikiFanCreator2010 (talk) 02:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:59, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism of info box and introductory biography, regarding rumours of as yet incomplete transfer between football clubs Porto and Manchester City. As of now I the information is correct, however I have had to make these changes three times this morning and last night. This is the first time I've made a request for protection, I hope temporary semi-protection is the correct type. Lexxxicide (talk) 10:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Looking at the history it seems like much discussion should be necessary to determine what cryptocurrencies deserve inclusion. Due to the fast-changing nature of cryptocurrencies this template will need updating frequently, however it is important that a consensus is reached first. Felixphew (Ar! Ar! Ar!) 01:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending changes can't be applied to templates, and there isn't enough activity to warrant semi protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Moderate level of vandalism. Reason listed for revision of sourced facts, show bias on topic from source of vandalism. Mir227 (talk) 22:15, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guess they meant the article, 2014 kidnapping and murder of Israeli teenagers, which is funny b/c I thought about semi and mentioned it in my last edit-summary. Take a look at the recent history to get the details. I still of course support and encourage semi protection, especially after those new account edits :) TMCk (talk) 22:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Looks closer to an edit war beginning, I've notified both of discretionary sanctions and don't see enough disruptive IP/new account edits to warrant semi. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:17, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an IP user, approximately 14 times, causing the article to become broken and adding false or inaccurate information. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 17:43, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Someone is moving it while RM is ongoing. George Ho (talk) 05:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users are repeatedly vandalising the page. Need at least 1 month protection. Rameshnta909 (talk) 15:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how this goes first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP sock repeatedly adding a paragraph sourced only to a couple of Reddit threads. (User:64.229.137.56 seems to have switched to User:76.70.41.33 after getting a 3RR warning.). McGeddon (talk) 12:46, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DMacks. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:04, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 01:45, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Monty845. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 21:36, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I am requesting temporary semi-protection for this page. I originally asked for this page to have its protection lowered to pending changes, but it seems that vandalism to this page has been running rampant. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 19:15, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:22, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users are repeatedly vandalising the page. Some are trying to push original research. Rameshnta909 (talk) 15:30, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – in the news cycle. multiple IPs making BLP violations. Gaijin42 (talk) 02:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator The Interior. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent and seemingly escalating harassment by IP editors changing the female pronouns to male ones in violation of the relevant MOS. Diffs: [44], [45], [46], [47] Euchrid (talk) 01:43, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment': Article was, from 7 July to 21 July, under PC1 for exactly this issue. Article frequently deals with this particular issue as well as escalating forms of it, by IP editors and non-confirmed accounts (just see the page logs for proof: rather large amounts of edits have been fully or partially revdelled, for username, edit summary and/or content violations (some of the partial (edit-summary only) revdels are of reverters because the summary includes revdel-worthy username of revdelled edits). I strongly agree with the need for page-protection, and PC does not seem to have helped much. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 03:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse --NeilN talk to me 04:15, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:08, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Nearly 3,000 transclusions. George Ho (talk) 07:16, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That might be but it's not been touched at all this year and not much at all in general. I don't see what good template protection brings besides it being more protected against no present threat. tutterMouse (talk) 10:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  11:39, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page has been semiprotected 4 yeas ago for vandalism. This may be a reasonable time to return this article to the default state in which anyone can edit it (Ie: unprotected). QrTTf7fH (talk) 19:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Given the protecting admin is inactive (Courcelles) I've applied pending changes, if vandalism continues (with a reasonably low bar) I'll semi it again. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:49, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

31 July 2014

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent edit war/vandalism from two new user accounts, second one popped up after first was blocked [48], I think it reasonable to assume they will continue in this behaviour unless article is protected. Thanks. -Oosh (talk) 06:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a month by 2over0. Mike V • Talk 17:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The protecting administrator is inactive currently, so I'm requesting time extension. --George Ho (talk) 21:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

: Semi-protected for a week by Mark Arsten. Mike V • Talk 03:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see semi-protection yet. --George Ho (talk) 04:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for six months. Sorry about that, I confused it with a different request elsewhere. Mike V • Talk 05:16, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I believe this page should be unprotected because this page being protected means that unregistered/new users cannot report incidents to the administrators. Gerry.y.ma (talk) 02:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined ANI is often protected for short periods of time when there are disruptive edits. Currently the page will be unprotected in 4 hours. In the meantime, IP users are welcome to contact an admin directly with their concerns or post their message on the talk page, which can be copied over to ANI. Mike V • Talk 03:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mike V • Talk 03:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mike V • Talk 03:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mike V • Talk 03:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Mike V • Talk 03:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 22:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done I protected it based on the AN/I report. Monty845 01:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The inevitable nonsense edits have resumed (they are daily now) since the last protection expired. A longer protection would be nice but if a week or so is deemed appropriate could you please add this article to your watchlist and protect the page as needed in the future. Please note this is not a demand just a request. It comes from the fact that this stuff has been going on for 4 or 5 years. MarnetteD|Talk 15:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Same exact issues as before. Edit count too high for pending changes, in my opinion. Please understand that there should never be a "demand" for protection, they are all requests. — MusikAnimal talk 21:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New WP:SPA user and possibly related IP repeatedly blanking a properly-sourced controversy section in this article. Both have been warned multiple times. Ivanvector (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:14, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP is repeatedly 1, 2, 3, 4, removing explanation of jargon term "heel", ignoring a relevant Wikiproject's consensus (scroll down to read Compromise). Article is GA and up for DYK with hook already in queue, so the high standards should be maintained. starship.paint ~ regal 13:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Are you sure that the user is intentionally doing wrong (Does he has committed blatant vandalism in other places?)?. If so, see Wikipedia:Vandalism#How to respond to vandalism; you can request action to be taken against the user. If he's just being obstinate on a viewpoint then try talking with him in his talk page or the article's talk page. I don't think that article protection is required. QrTTf7fH (talk) 21:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 21:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CyrockingSmiler (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 21:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Archive/2014/07&oldid=1200955550"