Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2015/01

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2015

01 January 2015

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 19:48, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: unexplained ip removal of info and addition of unsourced blp info which i believe is probably in good faith. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 19:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:27, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent edit warring over same content by multiple users (SPI is open at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr.Arslan Jamil). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of copyvio. TwoTwoHello (talk) 17:48, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:11, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 17:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:04, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Only edits after last protect expired are dubious and unsourced changes. Likely deliberate falsification of info. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Background: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gabriella~four.3-6/Archive User has been engaging in sockpuppetry since January 2014 or so. Without getting into the entirety of the case, the article I am requesting protection on was created by one of her socks, Gabriella703, and has been manipulated regularly by some of her IPs [1][2] by an obvious sock [3] and by a suspected sock [4]. Based on the user's long-term pattern of disruption, her persistent intention to create multiple accounts sometimes almost simultaneously, I'm requesting long term protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. This is not a very heavily edited article. Thanks.Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mike V. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: multiple month long edit warring by rotating IP. See same edits as far back as mid November. Article was previously temporarily semi protected. IP came back when protection expired.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=King_v._Burwell&diff=634017033&oldid=633938802. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: A problem article. Lots of unsourced or poorly sourced material added continously, very few editors with expertise and a real long time problem. Article is well developed but also target to different controveries - and time to time target of NPOV edits modifying it accordingly. If not semi at least please pending changes. Hafspajen (talk) 10:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:52, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The country Ukraine is currently undergoing a civil war, and this is massively spilling over into Wikipedia. At least half of the editors who work on Ukraine related articles are obviously on one side or the other of this civil war. Nevertheless, editors on both "sides" agree on certain facts. Yet an IP has been making edits denying these facts, most notably by insisting upon the inclusion of the word "allegedly", when it is acknowledged by all sides that what is involved here are not allegations, but facts. This IP's edits are highly disruptive. – Herzen (talk) 18:55, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Weekly vandalism. Dismas|(talk) 15:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism recently, due to him opting out of his contract. buffbills7701 14:48, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Highly visible template. Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 14:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected. Sam Walton (talk) 14:06, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: users are using the page 2015 as their own personal new years countdown, which is a violation of WP:NOT#NEWSREPORTS. Please fully protect until the new years is over--Fruitloop11 (talk) 04:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Looks to have calmed down. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:19, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 02:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:13, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indef-protection: Template is an offshoot of Template:FM station data, which was indef-protected back in 2011 by User:Closedmouth, per WP:HIGHRISK. The FM station data template was also move protected in 2013. The LPFM station data template will be used across hundreds of pages. Neutralhomer • Talk • 12:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected, only used three times in articles right now Neutralhomer, but I will take you at your word that it will be increased in the near future. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:56, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It will indeed. I just wanted to show it in action prior to protection. I left a note on your talkpage regarding this template (I made a goof in creation). - Neutralhomer • Talk • 12:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent and repeated IP edit-warring and disruptive editing over the past several days. Softlavender (talk) 06:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and edit warring. Rhydic (talk) 02:30, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Chinese nationalists continuing to change Masayoshi Son's ethnicity without reliable sources. 24.87.52.189 (talk) 22:51, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:54, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 01:57, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:11, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeated recreated copyvio. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 01:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:08, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by several IP users. Areaseven (talk) 00:57, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:04, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Excessive sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:54, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:01, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Title and nature of article a perpetual vandal magnet. Shut down the drive by kiddie nonsense. . Montanabw(talk) 06:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I really can't see indef as a first protection, though this does seem a steady problem. Come find me in April if the problems continue. Courcelles 08:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 00:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:58, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal 50.153 has been disruptive several times last few days. QED237 (talk) 22:30, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:49, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Just two users going back and forth. Gloss 21:13, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is already attracting an undue amount of IP vandalism. Other years have also required indefinite semi protection . --John Cline (talk) 21:08, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP(s). Repeated addition of unsourced content contrary to consensus and in defiance of a clearly worded, and conspicously visible (to editors), page notice. This page was recently semi-protected for a week and the problem has persisted since the semi-protection expired. It should also be noted that has been a recurring issue on this page over the past few years.--JayJasper (talk) 18:51, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Scurvy article has been protected since September 2010, without a reason being provided (vandalism is not mentioned). Can this page be unlocked please?

On a related matter, there is a conflict in the advice given: the Scurvy article page (Protection log) states that requests for de-protection should be made here on this Request page, whereas this Request page states that de-protection should be discussed on the article Talk page. Would be helpful to have non-conflicting instructions! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.135.38.4 (talk) 11:12, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was semi-protected back in 2009 because of vandalism by User:Dabomb87 but that admin isn't very active these days and was changed to pending changes during the trials in 2010 and changed back to the original protection level after the trials ended. As for the instructions, those are for requests to protected pages if the talkpage is also protected. If you're looking for unprotection in general then discussions would take place either with the protecting admin or in this section, yours was in the requests for edits to a protected page section but I have moved it for you. tutterMouse (talk) 19:21, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected The admin hasn't edited in almost a year. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:35, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Week-long slow edit war. Just warned the users, so protection may or may not be needed. Stickee (talk) 00:52, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 00:54, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted 4 times. Boleyn (talk) 21:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - unless I'm missing something, this page has not been re-created for five years? JohnCD (talk) 21:31, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruption over past week; blanking and changing factual details. Middayexpress (talk) 20:55, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

02 January 2015

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just after the article's second time being unprotected, there's more IP vandalism. This page is obviously very prone to vandalism and violations of BLP, so I'd recommend indefinite protection. . Pishcal — ♣ 17:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article should be protected indefinitely. Culopala (talk) 17:21, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just 125 minutes after lifting the semi-protection, an IP was back for a the same type of POV-editing that got the article protected. The Banner talk 17:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What vandalism? Just because you, bobrayner and others gang up on me does not mean you are right. 62.193.152.83 (talk) 17:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
'62.193.152.83' it becomes 'vandalism', when you repeatedly make the same edit, there is a discussion on the talk page, to which you are invited to contribute. Pincrete (talk) 18:14, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Roving IP adding hoax info to article - assertion of restart of ended TV series using none or bogus references for support. Never same IP twice. Previous target was Dan Vs. which was protected for same reason. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:16, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Promotional IP and promotional brand-new user account; I think the two are linked, but there are far too many overtly promotional edits going in right now regardless. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:28, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours. QED237 (talk) 14:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the doge meme every time protection expires there is a new vawe of vandalism. There is a consensus that it shouls not be added to article, on talk. But no editor cares much for that. Hafspajen (talk) 12:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The problem edits would be stopped easily through semi-protection I feel, possibly indef like Doge (meme). Full protection seems overzealous. tutterMouse (talk) 14:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK - like Doge meme -that's fine. Hafspajen (talk) 14:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1001 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – On 14 May 2012 this article was suggested as a target for a specific type of vandalism on The Oatmeal, a high-traffic website. Once the page protection ceaced, we got editors pushing the same type of vandalism. We're coming up on 3 years since the original article and we still have drive by vandalism making the same opposed arguments. If someone wants to make a suggestion for an edit, the talk page is open to suggestions that don't involve this joke or BLP violations. Pinging Admins (Joe Decker—CharlieEchoTango—Kudpung—Runningonbrains—Bongwarrior—Reaper Eternal—The Wordsmith) for additional advice as each one of these Admins has adjusted the protection level of this page since the joke went live. Hasteur (talk) 16:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for one year (again), User:Joe Decker got there a while before this requests and no edits since but I imagine we'll be back here again next year as these things won't go away for as long as The Oatmeal's strip keeps circulating which might as well be forever. tutterMouse (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
TutterMouse Please reconsider. I didn't ask for a one year, I asked for indefinite. There's no reason for us to kick the problem down the road a year only to have to solve it again. Hasteur (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You'll want to take it up with @Joe Decker: as protecting admin, He protected ahead of your request and I'm not even an admin or I'd have asked Joe myself to prevent a wheel war. tutterMouse (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection Constant removal of notable reviews by IP editors who disagree with the review. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 15:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:04, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not so much a reduction in protection level as much as it is a reduction in protection duration. I think what the page experienced was a short-term problem that could easily have been resolved with a shorter block duration. Cyphoidbomb said on its talk page that he didn't see any reason for an indefinite protection. ElectricBurst(Is there anything you need of me?) 09:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, This page has been protected five times in 2014 alone, including the current protection. The previous expired on 23 December and it was indeffed five days later. Also you should request the reduction from the protecting admin prior to posting here, in this case Ronhjones (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) kelapstick(bainuu) 13:08, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The message replied by Cyphoidbomb at Talk:Boomerang (TV channel) said it was fully protected and that was his answer to that level of protection - that was a false argument - it has never been fully protected (one would rarely indef an article to fully protected). We truly suspect the UPN vandal will be back, as always, within a week, once he's managed to gain a new IP address, thus semi protection is the way to go. It has been semi protected 5 times in the past with a finish date - clearly that's not working. Setting a time limit is like giving the UPN an alarm clock, he'll be back the minute it expires, and we could then miss that. Making it indef does not mean forever - it means to some unknown future date where a case for unprotection can be given (i.e. we are convinced that the UPN has ceased operations), and the page properly monitored when unprotected. In any case, if semi-protection was causing a big issue there would be a raft of {{edit semi-protected}} notes on the talk page, which there are not.Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I totally misunderstood what the IP user was asking on the talk page. (Psst! It was not written very coherently!) I trust Ron's judgment on this matter. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. George Ho (talk) 00:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:02, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalized consistently for a long time and recently there have been sockpuppets using the subject to attack living people. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:31, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The disruption seems to have ceased. — MusikAnimal talk 06:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Some users kept messing with the lead section, which should alone should be left alone and also at the bottom of the page another user kept making lies and nonsense, also with foul language. . Smarty9108 (talk) 20:49, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. There is no chance that indefinite full protection will be applied. I'm not even seeing a great need for semi-prot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:39, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of changes have been seen on the page after every matchday like replacing player's name with other player's name etc. I would like this page to be protected from vandalism as it is frequent in this page. Sammanhumagain (talk) 04:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: On going discussion and ongoing move edit warring. - MrX 02:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected. Courcelles 05:33, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This time, there are no disputes. George Ho (talk) 02:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive edits from children who won't acknowledge existing guidelines like WP:TVUPCOMING or acknowledge warnings. Recently blocked user Tylerisawesome52 kept adding blank sections for an alleged upcoming new season. New user Omari is great (note the similarity in "is awesome" "is great") adds the same pointless section. Requesting 1 week protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmed users, although the article has been suffering from repeated hoax additions for a number of weeks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 ,onth, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – History of sockpuppetry on this page and has been previously fully protected for lengthy periods. More sockpuppetry after expiration of latest full protect. Safiel (talk) 01:00, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite is too much. This show comes out in a month.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 01:04, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps maybe a month then. Safiel (talk) 05:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hi,

there are too many people in a field called "physics" that are removing galilean relativity from the article, which is very inappropriate.

i have a problem with the people removing it because the large majority of individuals in "physics" blindly followed the lorentz transformation without even understanding that it has NO Geometric basis.

i have put my arguments forward on the talk page and did not receive any response by the individuals who are reverting my edits. i find this inexcusable, especially since i'm the one getting a warning for trying to keep the page AS IT WAS AS OF A WEEK AGO.

i think a mathematically competent individual is necessary to evaluate the validity of the block, because the removal of galilean relativity is UNACCEPTABLE. it is WELL KNOWN that galilean relativity has a MATHEMATICALLY RIGOROUS GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATION (unlike the lorentz transformation), which means that humans should be able to VISUALIZE The result.

i have provided evidence for my claims (see a gif i created here https://twitter.com/i3roly/status/550839327337762817) i am willing to provide a FULL fMRI nifti image file so that moderators can view the four dimensional basis themselves using the medinria medical image visualizer.

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.. --George Ho (talk) 04:33, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs have been adding the same line against talk page consensus for at least six weeks. See Talk:Bart Scott#Repeated addition of questionable contest by an IP. Part of a longer series of negative BLP edits. Meters (talk) 21:18, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 03:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High traffic page about current events that's prone to vandalism and edit warring. Pyrotle…the "y" is silent, BTW. 19:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Plenty of activity but relatively little disruption. Barring major disruption, we should make every effort to keep articles like this open. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Due to anonymous edits by Carl Hewitt and sockpuppets. --Blaisorblade (talk) 19:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by Internet 7000 and the same exact action by 91.125.235.250 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), apparently the same user logged out. The warring concerns an expansion of the plot section beyond the 700-word limit set by WP:FILMPLOT. Binksternet (talk) 20:57, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected.. AlexiusHoratius 00:02, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi Protection: 59 IP causing issues over the last three days adding promotions that are defunct or non existent and identifying promotion as related to another without a source. Suspect the same person with a dynamic IP. Semi protection will force him to use his proper account as I believe he has one. Request at least a week, but may need to re-apply. Curse of Fenric (talk) 20:36, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.  Meow 10:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this article was recently featured by Wikipedia's Facebook page as one of the top edited articles of 2014. I don't see the IP vandalism as excessive right now, but we could see a potential spike. I am going to leave it for now, but check back in a bit, any other admin please feel free to semi it if you think I am wrong. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per Kelapstick. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:53, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03 January 2015

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This was protected from December 23 through January 2 by Ponyo for "Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content". Identical edits resumed today with the same incorrect additions, and persistent reverting to try to retain them. Please protect for longer this time. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done Blocked by EdJohnston via WP:AN3 Mlpearc (open channel) 20:17, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 20:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Jeetpal Yadav (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 13:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Sam Walton (talk) 17:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been enough times this has been asked for a semi-prot, however the vandalisms never stopped, never ceased. And coupled wth the gross insulting content being added, this is a serious case of BLP vio. Please protect it semi for indefinite time. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 13:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Most of the disruption comes from an autoconfirmed user, and semi-protection is not going to help against them. It is unfortunate that gross BLP violation was introduced from an IP today, but it just happened once, and is not a reason to introduce semi-protection. I do not see any evidence that the level of vandalism is so high that semi-protection is required. Pending changes can be an option, but first the disruption should stop, the page is currently edited too much actively for perding changes. Once the editing frequency by non-autoconfirmed users subsist, and the problem remains, pls really for pending changes protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated and frequent removal of birthname by anons. The name is sourced to an interview with the article subject. Sitush (talk) 17:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP edits constantly changing things without consensus, discussion or even edit summaries. IJA (talk) 16:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal tries to add information sourced only to usergenerated sources. Sjö (talk) 15:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent unsourced additions to a BLP by numerous IPs. Egghead06 (talk) 12:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:16, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Reports about a proposed move to Nice; some RS claim he has been free transferred, others claim it will be a straightforward loan. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a month by Kudpung. Diannaa (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – And after the protection is removed, the ip is back with their non-constructive edits. Onel5969 (talk) 04:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:12, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 17:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: This is used as an example redlink at Wikipedia:How to create a page and has already been created as an article twice in the week that page has existed. CrowCaw 16:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Khalkhal County، Poldasht and Maku

full protection: Arazarazli (talk · contribs) tries to pretend three Iranian populated places, have Azerbaijan origin by changing their native names! If these populated places are in Iran, their native names must be in Persian language. Please protect these articles against these vandalism. Thank you. Gire 3pich2005 (talk) 10:30, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked., both users blocked for breaking 3RR--Ymblanter (talk) 10:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent and high level IP vandalism – IP addresses 68.3.78.41 and 72.208.167.147 consistently removing registered user edits. Diddykong1130 (talk) 09:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changes pending level 2 protection: High level of IP vandalism. VIPcritic (talk) 01:25, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. PC-2 is currently not supposed to be used. Also the last IP edit was in May. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:07, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: or possibly block the two users? Content dispute/edit warring – This article is one example of edit-warring taking place between two users. (here's another) See their contributions here and here. APK whisper in my ear 23:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:44, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined While there is some vandalism by IPs they are outweighed by the good edits by IPs. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continous addition of original research. I request indefinite semi-protection. Temporary protection has been applied in the past also, but the problem repeats after some months. Also, there has not been any useful additions by IPs, which will be hampered by an indefinite semi protection. . Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 07:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Delusional transfer gossip on a BLP. Past experience shows this rubbish lasts all through the month. '''tAD''' (talk) 04:51, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:16, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent edit by multiple IPs socking? Jim1138 (talk) 04:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kudpung . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours. QED237 (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. - MrX 21:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 21:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from lots of different IPs - subject has recently become a news item due to playing a game related to transsexual pornography on Twitter '''tAD''' (talk) 20:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:33, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Speculation over a move to Leicester City has resulted in this article getting a couple of half-baked edits by new users. Not confirmed yet, so semi-protection is needed. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of original research and false "facts" by IPs, adding fancruft edits of future album release. livelikemusic my talk page! 20:00, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{ Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:27, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism changing actor names to (presumably) those known to the IP editor. Also adding Mel Smith to credits for some reason. Two IP editors so far, both geolocating to Ar Riyadh, Saudi Arabia suggesting they are the same person. Previous editor gained a block over editing, but it doesn't seem to have slowed them down. Chaheel Riens (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism/undiscussed insertion of poorly-sourced negative material into a BLP by anons/new accounts. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:17, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 48 hour protection from IPs. An IP hopper keeps making these peculiar changes [5][6][7]. No explanation, no source. Difficult to communicate with them if they are hopping IPs. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP consistently inserting material that appears WP:OR. Probably inadvertent Sockpuppet since s/he signs on with different IP each time, so can't "discuss" it. Suggest 7-10 days semi-protect. Student7 (talk) 18:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:11, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection (one week only): This is to request only one week of full protection, administrator only, to direct attention to the page upgrade discussion presently taking place on the Dyslexia at Talk page for Talk:Zad68. The major diagnostic manual, ICD-10, has been re-written and the news about Alexia being integrated in the diagnosis of Dyslexia has not yet fully gotten around. The Alexia diagnosis has been absorbed into diagnostic category for Dyslexia. Redirect has been posted for Alexia following ICD-10 integration to Dyslexia. (Re-incorporation of integrated ICD-10 categorization of R48.0 from previously separated classification.) Current version is up to date with ICD-10. The temporary protection should be used to encourage Talk discussion at the Dyslexia article in order to avoid future edit reverts, and all editors are invited to attend the upgrade discussion on Dyslexia at Talk:Zad68. This is a request for one week only of full protection for only administrator editing. FelixRosch (TALK) 16:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined the article is very infrequently edited, and hasn't been edited in almost a month. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:28, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. 2nyte (talk) 15:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm seeing a lot of IP edits, but very few being reverted as vandalism. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:FrB.TG (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection User request.--FrankBoy (Buzz) 16:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Against what exactly? User talkpages are only protected under specific circumstances and it isn't experiencing them. tutterMouse (talk) 17:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@TutterMouse: Because of the users who vandalize and their vandalism get reverted by me. They leave annoying messages on my talk page to justify their edits, therefore I want this to be semi-protected, thanks.--FrankBoy (Buzz) 17:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined user talk pages are only protected in response to serous, sustained vandalism, not "annoying messages". HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I understand.--FrankBoy (Buzz) 18:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

04 January 2015

Semi-protection: Ongoing changes that go against provided sources. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1001 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: A month long edit warring without discussion. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 20:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous vandalism by IP addresses. Persistance IP vandalism. Need put temporary protection because some unregistered editors make many not justified editings without provide reliable sources which can confirm those editings. This the unregistered editors cause great harm and they do it absolutely deliberately. So please help and put protect for this module. Hanibal911 (talk) 19:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 13:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Speedily deleted the first time, AfD the second time. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 19:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Twice isn't really repeatedly in my mind, but I have created a redirect to discourage future article attempts. Thargor Orlando (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected indefinitely. Dreadstar ☥ 19:46, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated insertion of controversial material by unregistered editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We've had temporary protection several times and as soon as its over the IPs come in again and start the political campaign. With a general election coming up this is only going to get worse. Can we please have some long term protection. --Snowded TALK 18:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Individual has recently died and is being vandalized heavily. Stubbleboy 15:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 16:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent POV pushing and edit-warring by IPs during the last ten days, each repeating the same edit.Jeppiz (talk) 10:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous vandalism by IP addresses especially to the "imports" section, in which they put dubious and unsourced names on the table. -WayKurat (talk) 05:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:(Out-of-Drama) (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. 333-blue 09:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only edited before block, and very, very long ago. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:083c4s5la (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. 333-blue 09:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only edited before block, and very, very long ago. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:1-soutien-scolaire-marseille (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. 333-blue 09:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only edited before block, and very, very long ago. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:1-soutien-scolaire-marseille-com (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. 333-blue 09:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only edited before block, and very, very long ago. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:100cottonband (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. 333-blue 09:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only edited before block, and very, very long ago. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template. 333-blue 09:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only around 500 transclusions, no reason to increase to template editor per previous protecting admin. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:100hectares (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. 333-blue 09:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only edited before block. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indefinite semi-protection - relentless recurrent vandalism by same IP editor (current IP address: 76.175.73.87), who is clearly too close to the subject of the article, over long periods of time, removing sourced material he/she deems derogatory; insulting other editors in edit summaries. Quis separabit? 02:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Three administrators have now indicated that the article is not going to get indefinite full protection. There is no way that the problems on the page meet the criteria laid out at Wikipedia:Protection policy#Full protection. If you still feel like stiring this up then takeit to ANI. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – On 14 May 2012 this article was suggested as a target for a specific type of vandalism on The Oatmeal, a high-traffic website. Once the page protection ceaced, we got editors pushing the same type of vandalism. We're coming up on 3 years since the original article and we still have drive by vandalism making the same opposed arguments. If someone wants to make a suggestion for an edit, the talk page is open to suggestions that don't involve this joke or BLP violations. Pinging Admins (Joe Decker—CharlieEchoTango—Kudpung—Runningonbrains—Bongwarrior—Reaper Eternal—The Wordsmith) for additional advice as each one of these Admins has adjusted the protection level of this page since the joke went live. Hasteur (talk) 16:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{RFPP|s}} for one year (again), User:Joe Decker got there a while before this requests and no edits since but I imagine we'll be back here again next year as these things won't go away for as long as The Oatmeal's strip keeps circulating which might as well be forever. tutterMouse (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
TutterMouse Please reconsider. I didn't ask for a one year, I asked for indefinite. There's no reason for us to kick the problem down the road a year only to have to solve it again. Hasteur (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You'll want to take it up with @Joe Decker: as protecting admin, He protected ahead of your request and I'm not even an admin or I'd have asked Joe myself to prevent a wheel war. tutterMouse (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
De archiving because no ADMIN did anything about this. Re-pinging Joe Decker to deal with this or to indicate that they're yeilding. I ask that any lookey-loos please refrain from using the signaling templates. Hasteur (talk) 18:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
{{RFPP|n|Indefinitely semi'd by Joe Decker}} Steven Walling • talk 00:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Steven Walling WRONG! 14:27, 2 January 2015 Joe Decker (talk | contribs) changed protection level of Douchebag‎ ‎[edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 14:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC))‎[move=sysop] (indefinite) (Persistent vandalism: Well, that didn't take long) (hist). Why is it so hard to read instructions and make sure you're speaking from facts before you embarass yourself Hasteur (talk) 02:08, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
{{RFPP|ap|Joe Decker}} If you want it to be semi indef'd please ask the protecting admin. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Callanecc What part of Indefinite full protection don't you understand? Hasteur (talk) 04:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indefinite full protection: This template is important to WP and should not be modified. Wikipedian 2 04:46, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. There doesn't seem a problem with semi CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated Test edits by IP users affecting the article's stability and reliability. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit-warring by IPs and new accounts adding non-notable bands. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 02:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been deleted 6 times. Boleyn (talk) 00:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the article that was deleted five times in 2006 was about a different person. — east718 | talk | 00:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing IP vandalism concerning the 'Englishness' of this surname. The stub had been protected a couple times last year but the IP is back again.Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Consider asking the IP to engage on the talk page. Protection is not applied in the case of good faith content disputes. Steven Walling • talk 00:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is an article about a Pakistani hacking group. It makes sense that it will be abused as the edit history indicates. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 14:23, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Technical 13: The content looks potentially legit. Is the problem that the sources are bogus (i.e. self-published bragging sheets)? Steven Walling • talk 23:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, not vandalism, protecting would lock out one side of the content dispute. — east718 | talk | 00:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1) Steve, I hadn't seen that they added sources when they reverted me, and they still removed a lot of sourced lede content in favor of a list. 2) In doing so, they changed the article from an encyclopedia article to an advertisement that is just a list of `accomplishments`. I've reverted them again, and it is still sitting like that. I'll come back if need be. 3) east718, your decline because protecting would lock out one side of the content dispute seems entirely invalid. They wouldn't be locked out of discussing their points since content disputes belong on the talk page if they are going to happen. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 13:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection Request WP:SALTing of this article and variation Noe Garcia. Obvious WP:HOAX article about an 11 year old who made sex tapes with various real celebrities has been created and recreated 3 times in the last week. Creating account deletes speedy deletion tags as soon as they're applied. DOCUMENT★ERROR 03:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by Bbb23. Mike V • Talk 04:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism.  Dspradau → talk  01:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 02:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to have been a vandalism attack on this page by multiple editors over the past few days. Squinge (talk) 19:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Page has been A7ed. Miniapolis 01:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done (for the bot) Mike V • Talk 04:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protected due to an edit war in September 2013, but given that the article has hardly been edited on in the past few months it's safe to say the dispute has ended. . Aerospeed (Talk) 15:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected now - let's see what happens. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:32, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected for the bot. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:51, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Widr (talk) 23:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 00:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours. QED237 (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 00:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP has repeatedly removed BLPPROD tag. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, IP appears to have given up. — east718 | talk | 00:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Per this discussion, to be on the safe side.) Miniapolis 00:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 00:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — east718 | talk | 00:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection: Request this title be WP:SALTed. This article has been created, and speedily deleted, four times now (three of which occurred in the last 90 days) as both overt advertising and a BLP violation. In each case a different account created the page (albeit always with identical text), making a block against the account proper an impotent measure. There's nothing to suggest this page won't continue to be created ad infinitum until it eventually manages to slip under the door (the article creator is savvy enough to put this up only on weekends when there are fewer eyes here). DOCUMENT★ERROR 00:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done — east718 | talk | 00:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP users repeatedly inserting factual errors. -- Calidum 20:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ping me if it needs more. Steven Walling • talk 00:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruption over past few days on this and other pages [8]. One IP was blocked for vandalism, but appears to be using dynamic ips [9]. Middayexpress (talk) 17:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 00:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There have been constant edits about this duo dating someone or have recently gotten married without citation. It is currently on going. It began on December 29th. While I can tolerate reverting, at some point this has got to stop. Thank you!. Callmemirela (talk) 17:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 00:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous addition of unsourced sales and mayhem. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 13:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 23:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Many IP addresses have been vandalising this article since its creation, with some attempting to replace the entire content of the page. I have had to revert numerous changes today alone from the same 2 IP addresses. ⓈⓓⓌ④•talk•contributions• 13:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 23:49, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

05 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Considerable new-account vandalism recently. Long protection log here and last protection was for 6 months. Everymorning talk 16:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Been a while since it was protected. Courcelles 17:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection This article has been deleted and recreated 5 times in the last 36 hours as unambiguous advertising and it appears there is no end in sight to its creation/deletion/creation/deletion. DOCUMENT★ERROR 12:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by Cryptic. tutterMouse (talk) 12:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over several hours, not sure what's triggered it but it's been reverted a fair bit. CharlieTheCabbie|paġna utenti|diskussjoni 03:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Sam Walton (talk) 12:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anons and new accounts disruptively editing. Not sure what the recent flair-up is about. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the next protection should be indefinite.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism on a WP:GA. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the next protection can be infefinite.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours. QED237 (talk) 02:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an IP user, [[10]], who has in the past made unconstructive edits on other similar pages such as Hal Jordan, and the Hulk. Requested for discussion on consensus and warned the user about the three revert rule, but roundly ignored and has now made a fourth revert. Consider blocking the page from IP edits temporarily, or blocking the IP altogether due to a history of non-cooperation with other editors. Haleth (talk) 02:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 04:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism – This is an article about a species of ant that's getting attacked for fairly obvious reasons. -- naught101 (talk) 02:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 04:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Obvious failure of temporary protection to stop IP editors from adding attack text to this BLP. Binksternet (talk) 18:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{RFPP}} HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 04:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bladesmulti's deleting categories, references and info (sourced), restoring a version that's unsourced, uncategorized and has barely 2 sentences of completely unsourced content. Protection is needed- full protection to stop his vandalism. 217.12.214.70 (talk) 04:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles 05:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Several users continue to return and blank the discussion, as this is an archived discussion there should be no issues with indefinite protection. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected and courtesy blanked. Courcelles 06:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Detroit Lions fans have been trashing this article to complain about Morelli's calls in today's game. Arbor to SJ (talk) 01:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 04:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued re-establishment of a song that fails WP:NSONGS qualifications. livelikemusic my talk page! 01:19, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 04:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts from users to add referral links from Tsu and add their names as founders. —CraigyDavi (T∙C∙@) 22:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 04:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. WikiFanCreator2010 (talk) 23:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 04:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple users, possibly sockpuppets (opening discussion at SPI), have added completely unrelated information/spam about tanks to the article. The users stop after the 3rd warning or so, but it is picked up by another account. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 19:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection There is a full fledged edit war going on, some of it involving auto confirmed users, so semi protection won't help. The page is subject to discretionary sanctions so heads could roll if this isn't stopped promptly. MelanieN (talk) 19:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{RFPP|d}} I blocked the IP for block evasion; the other two parties are blocked and topic-banned respectively. That should solve the problem for now. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. 93.186.16.0/20 blocked for a year. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We are seeking the SALTing of all articles on the list linked. Secondly, requesting Blacklisting of all article titles containing any element in Group 1: (wilayat/wilayah/province including both capital and lower case) combined with any element in Group 2: (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant/ISIL/ISIS/IS/Islamic State). Hopefully this is the right place to request, if not tell us where. See this link], the links to the deletion discussions below it that resulted in all titles and redirects being deleted (lots of policy based comments), and editor discussion above it for support for this action. The continued disruptive efforts to recreate deleted articles with the same or very similar titles necessitates this. Request supported by User:Spirit_of_Eagle, User:Mhhossein, and I expect User:Gregkaye Legacypac (talk) 07:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Legacypac, rather than protect these one at a time I've asked at MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist# Wilayats of ISIL if they can be added. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support protection, a declaration of Wilayat with untranslated content and/or with the use of Wikipedia's voice is a violation of NPOV. Other people's describe the territory as something different. A very similar problem was raised when Daesh proclaimed themselves as "Islamic State" but, fortunately, in this case we had designations such as "Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant" to fall back on. GregKaye 11:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I went to go ask Technical 13 and ended up being distracted by another template. Anyway I've asked them now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've setup a page to track this issue where it will not be bot archived. We've deleted 27 similar articles plus 5 related ones so far in 10 different closed deletion discussions. These are akin an American terrorist group calling themselves New York State. Hence the request here. Legacypac (talk) 02:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now in favour of blacklisting (which is much more efficient). Come back if blacklisting is declined. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 23:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree apparently there is some 4chan thread trying to attack it... EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 23:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ... discospinster talk 23:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Repeated additions of unsourced claims; largely speculative in nature and focused on airlines and destinations. Most of those edits by unregistered users. Bellerophon talk to me 14:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Diannaa (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent POV pushing and edit-warring by IP user 98.21.111.231. Nyth83 (talk) 09:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06 January 2015

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of the Saban troll. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 12:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 17:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of the Saban troll. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 12:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 17:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of the Saban troll. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 12:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 17:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of the Saban troll. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 12:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 17:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant target of the Saban troll. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 12:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 17:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: LOng-running vandalism problems. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Censorship of material. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:07, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Repetitive mass-blanking of article content with no explanation. User has been warned, however most likely does not speak English, since they are from a low-income coal manufacturing city in Anhui Province, China. --benlisquareT•C•E 10:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  12:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent POV pushing; repeated additions of unsourced claims; ongoing changes that go against provided sources; persistent vandalism in violation of WP:BLP. Counselb (talk) 18:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC) : Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:42, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: article is being repeatedly reverted by IP users, pertaining to aircraft numbers in service based on source material - FOX 52 (talk) 04:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  12:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Articles are being vandalized regularly. The purpose why I am making a request because the article is a very important article and we don't want unregistered users to edit it and to avoid changes made by IP. Editors must log in first before editing. Sweetchloe16 (talk) 04:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm suspicious about this, seems there's some COI involved here especially with the implication of ownership, use of "we" and heavy bias. tutterMouse (talk) 13:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I see no evidence of persistent vandalism; but I do see signs of POV and COI here, here and here. Bjelleklang - talk 15:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  12:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. This article is currently semi-protections but that is not enough. User:Lackope,User:Zakoni,User:Mitrale89, IP operate identically, two of them is blocked. I think they sockpuppet. --ChumleeS (talk) 12:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the last remaining user has been warned, if they return, they should be blocked. Semi-protection against disruptive IP edits is already there.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:27, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Valmiki (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A new editor is edit warring over submitting a duplicate move requests and some personal attacks. After he is warned for edit warring, he is editing as IP to continue the edit war. . Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 09:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm loathe to go any longer than this for a talk page. GedUK  13:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism due to a controversial call from referees in the last game. TomCat4680 (talk) 07:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I only see 3 instances of IP vandalism related to the game. On the other hand, there are slightly more positive edits from IP editors in the same span. only (talk) 10:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rumours of transaction and unconfirmed reports mean people are flocking to article to add stuff without sources or confirmation. Vandals are using this as an opportunity to sneak in height changes too. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 03:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit count is way too high for pending changes. GedUK  12:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs keep removing a sourced para. 12 times since 20 Dec. : Noyster (talk), 12:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Disruptive IP edits, beginning on 15 Dec. --Lasunncty (talk) 09:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent edit warring / disruption by IP hopper. Page has already been semi-protected for 3, 14, and 30 days to deal with disruption by the same editor. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 00:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:48, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from various IPs, related to issues discussed on the talk page. Article was previously protected for 1 week. AD (talk) 22:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism from IP's following removal of previous Admin-only block. livelikemusic my talk page! 22:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:45, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism/POV pushing. Kahastok talk 18:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of the Saban troll. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 12:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of the Saban troll. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 12:19, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. APK whisper in my ear 09:27, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected only (talk) 10:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent vandalism on the part of an editor and/or socks. Article was created as a poorly written biographical article with most information copied from Sultan Bahu. This was AfD'ed by myself but I decided to withdraw the nomination after edits turned the article into something meaningful. However, afterwards an editor (and their socks, SPI report pending) went on to turn the article back into hagiography of Sultan Bahu (vandalising linking articles on the way, like Hamza Makhdoom). In brief the article is a ground of edit war and is requested to be protected in its non-biographical version. Suggested time 1-2 weeks, by which time SPI should be completed. Regards, kashmiri TALK 17:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC). kashmiri TALK 17:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The most recent account has been blocked, if they come back with another account or IP you can report to SPI (or if it's this obvious to AIV). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – roaving IP making unsourced claims and vandalism. Gaijin42 (talk) 03:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IP has been blocked, no need for PP. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 04:16, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced content by new users. IPadPerson (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Seems to have actually been properly sourced by now. Courcelles 04:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Various IPs keep restoring the edits by the blocked sock User:Joe2934. Pudeo' 19:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The same IP range is now edit warring to restore sock edits at Human skin color also. --Pudeo' 19:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 122.152.167.0/24 (talk · contribs). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated Disruptive editing and Test edits significantly by IP users apart from few new users. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 07:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, Eve Online in game corp trying to add itself to the article, there is also a reddit thread encouraging it. Would do it myself but there are potential Involved/COI issues. Monty845 23:56, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 07:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi protection - See [14], article was made by a sock and now he is edit warring/socking with an IP. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 07:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I suspect clear sockpuppetry here, first the user reverts with an IP, and soon registers an account for restoring the WP:OR. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 07:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still proposed for deletion and discussion have not finished but IP accounts keeps on removing the tag. MbahGondrong (talk) 01:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article deleted via now-closed AfD, so the RFPP is now moot. DMacks (talk) 07:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... 07:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated POV pushing and additions of unsourced claims. Edit war erupting. Alon12 (talk) 23:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. All the participants in the latest round are auto confirmed and would not be effected by semi-protection. Not enough to justify full protection at this point. Monty845 00:05, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. On ITN article. --BabbaQ (talk) 23:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There was only one IP being disruptive and they have now been blocked. Feel free to renew your request if more IPs start causing problems. Monty845 00:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Repeated placement of a biased picture that has never been discussed on the talkpage. There is an ongoing discussion on the talkpage, please lock it until the issue is resolved. It is currently only move protected.143.176.62.228 (talk) 20:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. -- Euryalus (talk) 21:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have. I've placed an rfc but it isn't helping. The person(s?) placing the picture are not posting anything on the talkpage. 143.176.62.228 (talk) 21:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
At present its just you edit-warring with a number of other editors to enforce your preferred version. Consensus broadly opposes your image removals, but let's see what the RfC brings. In the mean time, instead of page protection please continue the RfC discussion without further article reverts. -- Euryalus (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -24Talk 23:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very frequent vandalism and addition of unsourced content. Everymorning talk 20:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term sockpuppetry issues. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. -24Talk 23:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:54, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current target of roving IP - persistent. IP is trying to perpetuate a hoax about the resurrection of an ended TV series "Dan Vs." by inserting info about it in various other articles as the primary article has already been protected from this. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the name of the chief disruptor Gabuchis181, I suspect that he is a sock of Gabucho22, who had the same area of interest. User appears to be employing IPs from Medellin, Colombia, which is another problematic region for kids' TV vandalism. Duque Santiago was from there, I believe. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent POV vandalism, with abusive edit summaries, by IPs and newly-created SPAs. RolandR (talk) 15:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 19:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP users are changing 'facts' without consensus and their sources do not meet with the WP:RS. I have warned them through edit summary but they still do these reckless edits. kazekagetr 14:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 01:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

07 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: IPs have been trying to add unsourced or poorly sourced information about a fictitious show that the actor has supposedly participated in. I've reached 3RR on this so need admin to deal with undoing the damage afterwards. -AngusWOOF (talk) 20:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 12:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:34, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 12:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:33, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection or Pending Change protection. Similar reason to Charlie Hebdo: Vandalism by IPs, and also controversial article. Cbrittain10 (talk|contribs) 12:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — particularly due to ip hopping vandalism / block evasion in 109.125.0.0/18 --slakr\ talk / 12:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IP addresses. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 12:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — particularly due to ip hopping vandalism / block evasion in 109.125.0.0/18 --slakr\ talk / 12:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: There is a high level of vandalism from IP users and one time accounts. I'm requesting 4 months of protection on this page. BlueRedPurpleGreen (talk) 07:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two instances in the last month is no where near enough. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: User request; this should not be edited further by anyone or my account, in case if it is ever compromised. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 08:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:32, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But let me know if it keeps going. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Will do! Thanks for taking a look at :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Ongoing section blanking and a lack of productive discussion on the talk page regarding new sources. Not sure this will help the two sides out, but a week or two can't hurt. -- Kendrick7talk 04:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: IP users and one time accounts are either removing or adding things to often without explaining why. Also this page has a big history of vandalism. I'm requesting 3 months of protection on this page. BlueRedPurpleGreen (talk) 07:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sophomoric IP vandalism, see history. Montanabw(talk) 07:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page used to be semi-protected until last year, so this page became a target of vandalism and blanking after the protection period expired. So I had to clean up some vandalism. For example, I saw in the Background and History section, it mentioned about "Hold On Academy", in which the user who added such line obviously made it up. Also, one user replaced the file on this page with a link to a non-existent page, replacing the link to the file to a profanity-laced link as seen [15] here. Therefore, this page needs to be semi-protected once again. Snowager (talk) 07:33, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not enough of a recent history of protection to justify an indef. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism since his fight last weekend and since he was in the news today. 48 hours would probably be enough.Chuy1530 (talk) 06:56, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given that it's been protected recently I've gone with a bit longer. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:52, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Roving IP adding known fake info about the resurrection of an ended series, Dan Vs., in various articles - this one is the current target. Also, in this case, unreferenced derogatory info about living people. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent vandalism from three IPs resulting in a perpetual editing war between registered and unregistered users. This comes on the heels of a scandal concerning the founder of Anusara Yoga and the rebranding of it into The Anusara School of Hatha Yoga. It is likely that unregistered users either are or were connected to said school. Morganfitzp (talk) 03:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The past 50 edits, all in the past month, have been vandalism or unsourced additions. Gloss 06:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently left a football team, it'll die down with time. Note: it was already semi-protected from Jan. 1 to Jan. 4, and the vandalism resumed as soon as it expired. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 05:18, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salt the earth upon deletion. Repeated re-creation of a spammy (and potentially copyvio) article. Currently tagged G11. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:34, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mike V. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 02:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two bits of vandalism by two IPs, this edit wasn't vandalism and editing tests is pushing it, looks like GF attempt to fix. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm not seeing much vandalism, some content and formatting choices that the established editors don't agree with. Please re-report if the situation worsens. Diannaa (talk) 01:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

remove semi-protection ChristopheT (talk) 15:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Have you asked the protecting admin? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
of course I did (see the talk page) - reason : in a nutshell the article has been semi-protected since 2013 and I don't see a reason to keep it protected at this point. ChristopheT (talk) 12:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
He did seem amenable to the idea a month ago but I'd say to go speak to Doc James about it. I have pinged him so we'll see if he's willing to unprotect or allow someone else to do it. tutterMouse (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I did speak to James - I don't see why I would speak to him again - he suggested to have the article unprtotected by coming here. Anyways as an involved admin he should not be the one protecting / unprotecting ChristopheT (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This call for "fixing Wikipedia" is now a couple of months ago [16]. This is just one of dozens of techniques people are attempting to promote on Wikipedia.
Semi protection does not seem to me like an unreasonable bar for participation in controversial topics were issues have occured. We need contributors who have a basic understanding of referencing requirements before they edit articles such as this. Most of those who have commented on the talk page were supportive of continued semi protection.
Personal experience is not a sufficient reference. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Doc James: Are you happy to try out pending changes and see how that goes? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. I think that is reasonable. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple vector vandalism by new accounts and an IP. Requesting 24 hours semi-protection to halt the game of whack-a-mole. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 01:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained content removal from IP Hopping vandal. QED237 (talk) 23:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 01:33, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated removal of content by IPs. Hirolovesswords (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 01:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Anonymous IP continually vandalising the article by imputing personal bias. Stamboliyski (talk) 13:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Diannaa (talk) 01:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated removal of AfD notice by new/IP users. Normally would not want to protect such a page but this is simply disruptive. The editor(s) can engage in the discussion if they want to save it from deletion. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 14:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article has been deleted. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated (3) page reverts, some from Westminster IP addresses, alleged assault, misleading constituents - appropriate references appear to be on the page Tomhannen (talk) 13:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The last edit to the page was over 24 hours ago. You might want to try discussing this with the editor concerned. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. (Rovinemessage) 12:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Imveracious (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Imveracious/Archive. Dawnseeker2000 18:02, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:39, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SLBedit (talk) 11:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Accurate historical content was deleted without permission. There was an addition of false information. Mkilfoyle (talk) 04:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request unprotection of the Snoopy Dog Dogg page, so that real people can edit it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.206.183.247 (talk) 09:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chamith (talk) 17:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated Test edits by IP users. The article is prone to further damage as the film is releasing on 10 Jan. Requires a protection for a suitable period of time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:33, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Player has a deal with Leicester City, but it is subject to a work permit being approved; and this is not a mere formality. Plenty of autoconfirmed users seem to be blatantly ignoring this, so please fully protect this for a week, ensuring that the club has NOT been changed to Leicester City when you do so, as you'll be locking in the not-yet-finalized transfer. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of high profile BLP. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ... discospinster talk 15:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User:85.242.88.88 is disrupting the article by removing a reference that provides crucial information. SLBedit (talk) 15:23, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent levels of IP vandalism, especially due to the recent events surrounding the club. Andrew Henderson 13:43, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP adding demafatory statement about "homosexual men", edit war with User:Gilliam (who is in the right). Proposed protection until Charlie Hebdo shooting is out of the news. FourViolas (talk) 13:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring by IP user who is unwilling to discuss . Malayala Sahityam (talk) 12:11, 8 January 2015 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous IPs are adding a host of unsourced artists despite requests/warnings not to. Egghead06 (talk) 12:09, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:16, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nowhere near enough of a protection history to justify indef at this point. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:53, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:53, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I know it's early but every single year this article gets hit with linkspam from early January onwards. This year's has started. Can we get it semied to Feb 15th?. NeilN talk to me 06:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles 10:38, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. George Ho (talk) 02:29, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like it's stopped, let us know (re-report) if thing flare up again Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A user with multiple sock accounts keeps adding promotional-like content in the said article after being warned and reverted several times. -WayKurat (talk) 05:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Like I stated when I recently brought this matter here, but was denied WP:Semi-protection by CambridgeBayWeather because of a heading dispute, this article needs indefinite semi-protection. It is a WP:BLP violation magnet because of the rape matter that it covers. Because of that rape matter, leaving the article unprotected is never a good idea. Flyer22 (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Callanecc, thanks for helping. But how is WP:Semi-protection for one week, or the WP:Pending changes protection you opted for instead, the best option in this case? The Curtis Lepore article keeps needing WP:Semi-protection; it should at least get six months worth of WP:Semi-protection, if not a year of or indefinite WP:Semi-protection. It's tedious to keep requesting WP:Semi-protection for this article. And WP:Pending changes barely helps anything, in my opinion; WP:Vandalism and other WP:BLP violations will slip through in a WP:Pending changes case for this article. Flyer22 (talk) 05:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not instead, as well as. If you go back the just before the beginning of the year there wasn't as much activity indicating that a long term semi protection probably isn't needed. So the semi is to stop the recent spate and the pending changes filters out anything else for 6 months. If you think still is getting through and being accepted then. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Callanecc, thanks for explaining. I still feel that article should be WP:Semi-protected for six months or more, per what I stated above. After the one week wears off, all that will be there is WP:Pending changes. But I'll see how the protection you added goes. On a side note, I restored your "05:18, 8 January 2015" comment above, which was accidentally removed by WayKurat,and signed it using your signature style. Flyer22 (talk) 06:43, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Religion (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppet of Wiki Bible Denounced is at it again. The person also uses IPs in the range 103.2xx. Binksternet (talk) 00:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Current edit warring between three IP addresses (currently being reverted by editors). They have been removing content in the Controversy section about One Million Moms without previous discussion or consensus without valid reasons. U referenced content has also been an issue, emphasizing words to prove their point. Warnings and talk page have all been ignored. . Callmemirela (talk) 02:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (semi for 1 week). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, unsourced/inaccurate/premature transfers being made, take your pick, because both have happened in spades for quite a while now. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 01:41, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:54, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continued edit-warring in a bitter content dispute. Elizium23 (talk) 01:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Users keep on adding promotional content to the article. theenjay36 23:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A single anonymous user continues to spam the page with false information regarding things that have never happened (such as character having new voice actors and backstories). --ZootyCutie (talk) 23:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined report he IP to AIV or ANI, with a clear explanation of how their edits are disruptive. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by IPs, see discussion at AN3. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 22:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by IPs discussed here. Article was not noted in discussion, but war is here too. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 21:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Current edit war between IPs, not discussed at AN3, but same IPs as there. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 21:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

M. S. Dhoni: The Untold Story (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Extend pending changes: There's still vandalism. --George Ho (talk) 03:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. seicer | talk | contribs 04:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – during PC. George Ho (talk) 03:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. seicer | talk | contribs 04:11, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism as well as helpful contributions from IPs & new editors. This has been done before, and this article will most certainly always be a vandalism target. Qxukhgiels (talk) 02:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of Indefinate, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. seicer | talk | contribs 04:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined minor edit war seems to have petered out. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:16, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 19:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined we don't normally protect the TFA except for severe vandalism, and it's off the main apge as of eight minutes ago HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Users copying and pasting summaries from other websites. . Dcbanners (talk) 12:44, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined calling a small sentence fragment using lain English words a copyvio is absurd. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of false information, please, protect the article. REPARADOR (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IP's. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Foxj. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: temporary protection for vandalism and promotionalism . Hell in a Bucket (talk) 00:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{RFPP|nea}} HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:33, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry HJ I'd already protected it, given the history I see it as a continuing problem. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. PC it is. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect due to a lot of incorrect edits about him moving club. JMHamo (talk) 23:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:29, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of false information, please, protect the article. REPARADOR (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. MJ94 (talk) 21:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs have been trying to add unsourced or poorly sourced information about a fictitious show that the actor has supposedly participated in. I've warned the IPs but they still add the information regardless. Need admin to deal with undoing the damage afterwards. -AngusWOOF (talk) 20:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism for the last several days (last ~20-25 edits have all been vandalism/reverts), mostly from IPs or newly registered editors. BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 19:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. McVeigh / talk 18:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring by unregistered editors. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism due to unconfirmed media reports. JMHamo (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GiantSnowman. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Roving IP adding known fake info about resurrection of a tv series (Dan Vs.). Multiple targets, this is latest, others protected from this. Also WP:BLP issues with unreferenced derogatory statements about living people. . Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nothing but vandalism/reverting in the past 15/20 edits, only dating back to the past week. Gloss 17:18, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing from IP and a new account; removal of sourced material. Ymblanter (talk) 16:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now another SPI joined.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article about an Indian surname: it has a section on notable people with that name. IPs regulary add non-notable redlinked/nolinked names - probably themselves. DeCausa (talk) 15:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP users (in particular) changing this soccer player's team based on rumours. Cashewnøtt (talk) 13:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:52, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

long term semi protection every crank with an ax to grind wants to put their non-event in the list and thereby gin up the "Streisand effect" of said event. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the editing rate is not so high, pending changes should be sufficient.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For two days, transfer speculation linking Kramaric to Leicester City has been ongoing, and for two days, a whole bunch of dodgy edits have gone in; some pure vandalism, some making the claim that he has switched. As of right now, this is not the case. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:52, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – and sockpuppetry (editing while logged out). - MrX 16:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also a number of IP edits made in violation of MOS:IDENTITY. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 18:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles 22:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

09 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sensitive BLP due to recent sexual abuse allegations against article subject. IP reverting back in bad content, content not referenced by reliable sources, using bogus reasons for reversions. Likely same sockpuppet IP from Constitucion, Chile article - that article had to be protected, as well, and the IP has a vendetta against me. IP is using proxies. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 15:32, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:AN3 notice regarding this article 213.7.149.151 (talk) 15:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from WP:AN3 notice

    • Allegations are completely unjustified, user:winkelvi is rigourously edit warring to secure his revisions. He is not making an attempt to improve the article. user:winkelvi is currently banned from editing the Bess Myerson article due to edit warring.

Reporting user is proxy IP hopping again. And no, I am not "banned" from editing any articles. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 15:53, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 21:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Dick Strawbridge (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP Violations. See Article History. Avono (talk) 18:08, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Euryalus. — MusikAnimal talk 21:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Template. 333-blue 13:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Nobody has made any edits to it since 2006, and there hasn't been any discussion on the talk page about it since 2012, so there doesn't seem any appetite for any changes GedUK  13:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of persistent and recurring pattern of disruptive editing and unencyclopedic edits from User:Aeontamaraw and what appears to be IP sockpuppets of his. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:19, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Blakegripling ph: I'm not sure what you're asking to be lowered. Page is already semi protected. Aeontamaraw (talk · contribs) wouldn't be affected by semi protection, as they're confirmed. GedUK  14:05, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The same user has twice made edits that have led to breaking this template (and thus all instances of the template). Palmtree5551 (talk) 06:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I've warned the only disrupting user not to edit or remove content from these templates again, and will monitor their edits. The user is autoconfirmed so semi-protection wouldn't help anyway. Sam Walton (talk) 12:51, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extend pending changes: Editing low; vandalism level is low. Protecting administrator is inactive at the moment. --George Ho (talk) 03:34, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, There hasn't been much vandalism on this page since the semi prtioction came off, and most IP edits have been accepted GedUK  13:32, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Beforyouwere (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Keeps blanking warnings and related to a long term IP vandal . Legacypac (talk) 01:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. GedUK  13:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warring from unregistered (IP) user. Lklundin (talk) 10:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Sam Walton (talk) 12:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of sourced content by different IP accounts. KRIMUK90 ✉ 08:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Sam Walton (talk) 12:42, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – suspected vandalism by same person using different IPs. Dapiks (talk) 23:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Constantzeanu, I see the IP and their edits, but you would have made a much better case if you explained more fully in the edit summary and on the talk page what the problem is. In fact, simply calling it "vandalism" shows a lack of good faith for those among us admins who don't see what the disruption is. I also note that it's the same IP for over a week now, and thus it's a pretty static one--and I see that you have left no comment for them on their talk page (I left them a templated warning: you would help your case if you wrote them a note, with some details--you know this subject matter, I don't). Finally, full protection for something like this is unwarranted: a. we wouldn't apply full protection and b. we're only talking about a few edits since a brief outburst a month ago. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:19, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extra extra: I have a strong suspicion that there's socking going on; see my note on the IP's talk page. I will protect Romanians, and Olive skin as well. Drmies (talk) 15:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Target of anons and newly-registered users, presumably youngsters, who would insert test edits and made-up fluff about the characters. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:15, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Incessant, identical edits that are seemingly automated from multiple different IP addresses over a period of months even after previous protection. Rhydic (talk) 05:48, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations. VQuakr (talk) 04:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:34, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – One of a series of articles targeted by IP-hopping anonymous user making unsourced and unexplained changes. Mosmof (talk) 07:06, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sam Walton (talk) 12:44, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 06:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sam Walton (talk) 12:52, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sveuciliste1669 gets blocked and a few yours later Zsolnay99 shows up making the same edits. Even if Zsolnay99 gets a block as a sock or an edit warrior a few days protection of the article will deter more socking. MarnetteD|Talk 01:56, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over a long span - repeated nonsensical, unexplained changes of information, along with addition of unsourced content. ElectricBurst(Is there anything you need of me?) 01:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:26, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Toy Story 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandal magnet, from excessive information being added (sometimes inaccurately) to pure vandalism. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 00:26, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:I dream of horses (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. LorTalk 10:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sam Walton (talk) 10:44, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism / unsourced edits by sock. Article has been protected before, apparently for the same sock. Jim1138 (talk) 02:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This has been semi-protected for one year by C.Fred. Jim1138 (talk) 03:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator C.Fred. for 1 year. Sam Walton (talk) 10:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Concerted effort to insert anti-Canada, pro terrorist content by IPs and now an autoconfirmed acct going back to June 2014. Many issues with this POV content insertions. Legacypac (talk) 23:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC) Weird - this should be an increase - Twinkle is stupid today or maybe its the operator. Legacypac (talk) 23:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is semi-protected right now, so PC is a downgrade. PC is also not likely to catch autoconfirmed accounts IIRC. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 00:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest full protection until this discussion runs its course. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 01:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Leave it be. I've blocked Beforyouwere (talk · contribs) for a week, and will reinforce protection if they escalate. Materialscientist (talk) 01:08, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. (Beforyouwere (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist (talk · contribs)) -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 02:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Fairly important table that should not be edited by any new user; every time they have edited it, they've vandalized it. Not adverse to template protection either, but that probably isn't necessary. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 00:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP inserting dubious material. Does not participate in discussion. Suggest semi-protect for ten days. Student7 (talk) 22:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Everymorning talk 20:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, increasing the gross income of certain movies for their favourite heroes without any proper citation. harish kumar 19:22, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:33, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:MetalMan2015 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Talk page of blocked user being used by IP users to attack Ryulong (talk · contribs). Strongjam (talk) 23:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 23:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New page for a new GM of a football team. Been up for an hour and already had copyvios, blp vios, and general tomfoolery. A semiprotect until the novelty wears off, (or even a redirect) is probably in order to curb this. . CrowCaw 22:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – War here too, same people. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 20:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Last request resulted in IPs being blocked, but that has not helped. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 22:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war still going on here too. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 20:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Last request resulted in IPs being blocked, but that has not helped. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 22:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – War continued by other IPs and accounts. This needs to stop. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 20:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Last request resulted in IPs being blocked, but that has not helped. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 22:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is a target of Vgleer (see his SPI, if you like), as the history clearly shows; Vgleer is trolling Dr.K. and me, via outing and harassing. . Drmies (talk) 20:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Several new accounts, up to four so far, vandalizing the article over the last hour. Recommend 24 hours semi-protection to end the spat of vandalism on the article. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very few constructive IP/new account edits for a very long time. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resumption after last 1 month protect expired of adding known fake info to the article by roving IPs. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:31, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being targetted by a sockpuppeter, and I'm not seeing a whole lot of positive IP/new user history anywhere. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:23, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10 January 2015

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Excessive sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Bjelleklang - talk 20:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Excessive sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:47, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Bjelleklang - talk 20:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blanked 20 times by 5 different new accounts since 20 December. : Noyster (talk), 13:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 21:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also blocked a couple of vandalism-only accounts in the process. Bjelleklang - talk 21:13, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued edit-warring between user(s) and repeated IP's. Should receive heavy protection; album release of highly popular current pop star. livelikemusic my talk page! 19:28, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 19:57, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection Frequent target of vandalism by IP's and non-auto confirmed users, either putting their own names in (vanity vandalism) or falsely changing the current champion to their favorite wrestler. A magnet for immaturity. Previous temporary semi-protections haven't dissuaded new childishness (as they are always new users) and almost every edit is either vandalism or its reversion. This isn't based on any particular recent spate of bad edits, but an observation based on years of watch listing the article. oknazevad (talk) 18:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will keep an eye on it after the protection wears out, will extend as needed. Bjelleklang - talk 20:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Derogatory non-sourced commentary being added to BLP article. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 18:08, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 20:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This has gone far enough. George Ho (talk) 19:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note I don't have the time to read more into this right now, but judging by the protection log blocking some of the involved editors may be more favourable, as disruption by the same users appears to have continually happened after previous periods of full protection expired. — MusikAnimal talk 22:27, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a month by Black Kite. tutterMouse (talk) 15:14, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Assimifne (talk) 18:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 22:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent attempts by an IP (almost certainly Worldchampion2014 (talk · contribs) evading their block for legal threats) to add unencylopedic puffery and promotionalism, written in ungrammatical English to this BLP. Voceditenore (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still ongoing by an IP in the same range. Voceditenore (talk) 09:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 10:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For vandalism... Elblanco123 (talk) 20:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP 98.237.122.20 and others. Article subject, VeggieTales, and its myriad derivative articles have been the focus of prolonged disruption for a few years. In this case, however, I'm only requesting a one-week semi-protection from IPs. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:05, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent insertion of fan material--non-notable awards created by fans and, no doubt, added by fans, with no references. Drmies (talk) 15:10, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11 January 2015

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:R from ambiguous page (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: 2,000+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 17:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indef. AlexiusHoratius 20:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruption from IP users and vandalism-only accounts. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page is for Highest grossing tamil language movies world-wide.This page lost the semi-protection status and it experienced high amount of Vandalism from random IP/Users who also damaged the template..So,i request you to provide semiprotection for this page for a period not less than 15 days! Meeghaman (talk) 12:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Charlie Hebdo (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Barely literate IPs using talk page as WP:SOAPBOX and WP:FORUM for their gripes against the magazine, citing nothing except their own personal opinions '''tAD''' (talk) 11:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see some good edits from IP, and the number of bad edits is manageable. Given that this is a talk page, I am hesitant to protect.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Disruptive editing An IP keeps making changes that are incorrect. He/she keeps changing the "featuring" with "with" for the single "1.000.000", which isn't so according to the cover of the single.--Harout72 (talk) 02:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Harout72: Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Disruptive editing An IP keeps making changes that are incorrect. He/she keeps changing the "featuring" with "with" which isn't so according to the cover of the single.--Harout72 (talk) 02:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Disruptive editing An IP keeps making changes that are incorrect. He/she keeps changing the "featuring" with "with" for the single "1.000.000", which isn't so according to the cover of the single.--Harout72 (talk) 02:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Dutch person using different IPs are frequently re-adding individual media-profiled cases contradicting WP:UNDUE. Orland (talk) 13:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP adding original researches . Vin09 (talk) 13:03, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple entertainment articles

Temporary full protection: Articles currently not page protection by sockpuppetry edit warrior, Nathan3068alt/68.98.224.182, connect to Nate Speed/Nathaniel43284 and edit wars at MGM, MGM Holdings and DIC Entertainment. See full story at my talk page. --Spshu (talk) 02:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He has reversed six of the returned sourced versions. Spshu (talk) 02:24, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In retaliation, he has reversed by last edit at the above additional added article. Spshu (talk) 02:32, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added more retaliatory reversal and a false 3RR report at 3RR.

Adding additional that were only semi-protect. --Spshu (talk) 03:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: Spshu - This is an issue of sockpuppetry, and that's too many articles to protect. Please report the account as a sockpuppet of User:Nate Speed following the instructions at WP:SPI. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism, disruptive edits and original research being added by IP addresses. livelikemusic my talk page! 21:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I am sorry for not reacting on time, but the New Year wave of vandalism subsisted, and otherwise I do not see any reasons for even temporary semi-protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection. This article has already been semi-protected twice for a month at a time, because an anonymous user, using a dynamic IP address so he/she can't be blocked, has been attempting, on and off for six months, to insert a three-paragraph, context-free quote, attributed to Alan Moore but of no obvious relevance and apparently transcribed from a Youtube video, into the article. The last semi-protection period expired on 30 December, and he/she has just gone back to the same behaviour, repeatedly inserting the same long quote. Permanent semi-protection seems the only way to put a stop to this disruptive behaviour. --Nicknack009 (talk) 23:41, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We'll step up the length of protection a bit slower than that to see if that stops it. If they continue after this protection please re-report here, mention this 3 month protection and ask for longer (6-12 months). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Editors are repeatedly adding copyrighted image to article. obi2canibetalk contr 20:36, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Religion (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same thing, new sock. Binksternet (talk) 01:16, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Anna Frodesiak. (semi until 25 Jan 2015). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent edits from several IPs by the banned editor Ararat arev, pushing a fringe theory by roundabout means; see Talk:Orion (constellation)#Ancient Egypt for details of his current behavior. A. Parrot (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse at articles about music in the Caribbean, recent block evasion by 12.144.218.252 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), the person typically using US military IPs. (See blocked IPs 203.205.126.84 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 203.205.124.174 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 50.192.218.161 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) which have all been used by this person.). Binksternet (talk) 04:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:10, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP hopping user(s), sometimes from Liverpool, keep adding a middle name with no source. Since they keep hopping, there's no way to communicate with them. This has been going on for about 2 weeks. This user seems to have done this a bunch of times, for example here, in case anyone wanted to look into it. Most of their edit summaries don't match the edit, for example the addition of a middle name explained as "fixed grammar". Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 00:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Asking until the end of February, this is an annual problem as the same IP editors which bounce numbers regularly use the year's ceremony article to play Kidvid Nostradamus and list their own nominations and winners for a ceremony that doesn't announce anything until the last week of February (see the past KCA year articles for this pattern). Nate • (chatter) 06:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected: I've protected it until after the Awards (30 March 2015) since that's been necessary for the last few years. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse at articles about music in the Caribbean, recent block evasion by 12.144.218.252 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), the person typically using US military IPs. (See blocked IPs 203.205.126.84 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 203.205.124.174 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 50.192.218.161 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) which have all been used by this person.). Binksternet (talk) 04:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Three articles

Temporary semi-protection: persistent IP-hopping vandal. The first two articles were protected in April 2014, but IP vandal has recently returned. Zanhe (talk) 21:19, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandal using IP's and user accounts. Mlpearc (open channel) 07:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MJ94 (talk) 22:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Bagumba (talk) 02:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently died.. a lot of IP vandalism . JMHamo (talk) 19:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I looked at about 25 diffs by IPs and new users, and saw only one that was vandalism. Diannaa (talk) 02:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 21:34, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. for 3 days by Gilliam. Diannaa (talk) 02:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anom editors continue to remove valid inline tags without explanation. Perhaps a requirement hat edits be done only by registered editors would be appropriate. Thanks... reddogsix (talk) 14:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article was created yesterday; as far as I can tell there has just been a few occurrences of an IP removing a tag. Declining for now, will watch it for future developments. Bjelleklang - talk 20:13, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep removing a valid tag, and there's no real need for them to edit this anyway. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There is at least two other experienced users arguing to remove the tag. "there's no real need for them to edit this anyway" kind of violates the "anyone can edit" part of the Wikipedia slogan. Files are content, so they IPs should be able to edit those as much as any other page. Bjelleklang - talk 21:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:37, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 21:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant page vandalism by one IP who is attacking page; requires indefinite protection at this point. livelikemusic my talk page! 03:47, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 21:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – probably the best way to discourage the returning IP vandal who has been shown to abuse open proxies. The level of activity has been low, but this is because the previous vandalism was (accidentally) allowed to stand until now – yet they noticed its reversion 1 month later. From their behaviour, it is reasonable to expect the user will continue to restore the edit. —WOFall (talk) 21:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 22:34, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KAS(talk) 19:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amount of vandalism from various IP editors. Fazzo29 (talk) 19:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With recent news story SPA accounts have been coming out of the woodwork to push copyrighted material and corporate whitewash. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I blocked three of the accounts and only then did I see the SPI. Please note there that they're already blocked, and ask the admin, if the SPI/CU delivers anything noteworthy, to place a sockpuppet note on the various talk pages. Drmies (talk) 16:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP violations. In the last few days, since 10 January 2015 (UK time), I have counted up around 12 acts of vandalism to the page. One of the IP users who has carried out the vandalism has been blocked temporarily from editing. But other users who have vandalised the page are still able to edit. Last year the article had to be temporarily protected due to persistent vandalism. I fear that again this year, as Louis van Gaal is a very high-profile manager of one of the world's most famous football clubs, this article will continue to attract considerable vandalism and BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Besides the usual K-pop fan IP edits and suspicious accounts with only a few edits, this is a target of Vgleer's obsession. Drmies (talk) 15:38, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent reinstatement of fanlike trivia into a BLP for a person not notable outside the band. Edits are by IPs, use-once only accounts, and Vgleer--of course, the latter may be all of the former. Drmies (talk) 15:35, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent modifications not in agreement with supporting sources and refusal to continue using talk page. Jetstreamer Talk 13:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Recent edit warring. Two editors are at 3RR and while talk page discussion is taking place, so far the conflict is taking place on the article proper. . Noformation Talk 12:38, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'd rather hold off protection to see if the discussion actually gets anywhere first. Relist as necessary. GedUK  13:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 11:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  13:34, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing unsourced additions of upcoming album title. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:52, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Drmies (talk) 16:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 10:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's one IP today, they've been warned. GedUK  13:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  13:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sporadic but persistent vandalism. Page was previously protected for the same reason(see page history for more info). Page is currently being repeatedly edited by unverified IP sources to remove or truncate genres on page, despite relevance and verification on multiple external sources. Requesting to stop unauthorised IPs from editing the page further. — Forfy (Talk) Forfeh (talk) 11:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection – Repeated updates by anonymous users deliberately adding inaccurate information. The article was previously semi-protected for the same reason. — Mudwater (Talk) 11:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated article. APK whisper in my ear 11:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. GedUK  13:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – During PC protection. George Ho (talk) 10:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've removed PC, the edit count is too high. GedUK  13:19, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extend pending changes: There is still vandalism. --George Ho (talk) 10:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 03:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. -- Calidum 02:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – NFL coach who is currently subject of many rumors. IP users have been making unsourced changes to the article to reflect those rumors. . -- Calidum 00:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Toy Story (franchise) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandal magnet, on and off, for an extended period of time; however, there are a couple of very constructive IPs as well, so semi-protection isn't appropriate. Seems like a perfect candidate for PC. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 23:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:54, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Roving IP back at it again, same location as previous - adding provably fake info to article - ownership. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please restore the semi-protection that expired 20 December - they're at it again. : Noyster (talk), 10:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's been plenty of constructive IP edits as well, and the edit count overall isn't that high, so perhaps pending changes would be a better solution. GedUK  12:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The subject of the article is ongoing media attention and frequent vandalism. Λeternus (talk) 10:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP removing cited information. Long-term edit-warring. Probable sock. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Knisfo. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 11:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected.. GedUK  12:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce back to semi-protection: Even though the full protection was set to expire January 9, I am unable to edit the article. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Looks like the expiration dates for editing and renaming were accidentally switched. Favonian (talk) 12:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: - Repeatedly recreated autobiographical articles. Also Satish singh gahmari. APK whisper in my ear 09:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. I requested protection on the talk page a while ago but got no replies Tetra quark (don't be shy) 22:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The level of vandalism is insufficient for semi-protection in my opinion, but I configured pending changes. Let us see how it works.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page is a list of highest box office collection of indian movies worldwide, based on true box office reports,some random ip edits have been taking place to make their favourite actors movie feature into this list,since this is for sake of entire film industry in india,i request in good faith to give a semiprotection status for a minimum of 15 days . Meeghaman (talk) 08:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., but it has potential for indefinite semi-protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible redirect with virtually zero future edit potential. Protecting it is just good sense and prevents repetition of past incidents. Codename Lisa (talk) 04:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Was just going to come here to post this but I see its already been posted. Given the confusion in naming i.e. Microsoft jumping from windows 8 to windows 10 this is a useful redirect however it is not useful for it to be messed about with all the time fully support semi protect. Daniel298289 (talk) 06:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Nobody knows what Microsoft policy in 1 year will be, so that I am hesitant to protect indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by 80.212.4.12 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) using multiple Norway IPs including 88.88.36.157 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 80.212.111.41 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Binksternet (talk) 04:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 00:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Request that only registered be allowed to edit this article for an indefinite period of time. Unfortunately there has been too much vandalism and addition of false information added to this article by IP users causing an editing war and 3RR violations. Thank you. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 22:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. In this case, pending changes are more appropriate.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page was semi-protected and since expiring a few days ago, once again vandalism by anon user has occurred. Would be great to put it back to semi-protection status. Thank you Benjackson77 (talk) 08:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: - Repeatedly recreated biographical article. APK whisper in my ear 07:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:43, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Editors are repeatedly adding copyrighted image to article. obi2canibetalk contr 20:36, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of five days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too many IP accounts adding unsourced and unconfirmed informations, such as players that are still in selection process and havent officially signed. MbahGondrong (talk) 19:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr. Lama. . SummerPhD (talk) 18:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - This article has been subject to a large amount of vandalism the last few days as the tournament approaches. Semi-protection until the tournament is over should suffice. – PeeJay 17:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editors persistently altering sourced DOB and other content. SMS Talk 15:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:56, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Regular vandalism and a high-traffic page, but it generally is slow-burning enough for a long-term PC to do the job. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Khadar Khani (talk) 13:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Requesting deletion of current article and protection against recreation. Has been created and deleted several times in the past, and deleted with WP:CSD#G11. Thanks,. ceradon (talk • contribs) 09:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page created twice as a hoax, 10 and 13 Jan 2015. Could use protection to prevent recurrence. Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous IP vandalism after first protection expired two days ago. IP editors adds dubious players in the "imports" table. -WayKurat (talk) 05:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Game just finished. Expecting tons of vandalism from fans. (in fact, it was vandalized right when I looked at it just now!). ViperSnake151  Talk  05:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection Edit warring. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's constantly adding inaccurate info. LLArrow (talk) 04:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring between myself & 62.253.57.164 concerning ownership of controlling stake in TNA Wrestling, despite correct, up-to-date information being presented by myself. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 04:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Different IP socks of User:Jajadelera targeting the page. Jetstreamer Talk 03:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Blocked user targeting the page through IPs. Jetstreamer Talk 03:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Despite discussion. George Ho (talk) 02:57, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – that's bad. Tetra quark (don't be shy) 02:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Trying to discuss WP:RS, WP:POV with IP who is probably inadvertent WP:SOCKPUPPET with several IP numbers but saying the same thing. He (probably not she!  :) is apparently not familiar with discussion pages on articles. I'm trying to communicate on his IP talk page but have to repeat the same stuff for each page. Not sure if he really sees them. I think IP would benefit by understanding that Wikipedia HAS a system to determine content without edit warring. Ten days should be sufficient. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 01:15, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Following ignorant comments by a Fox News "expert", this article is attracting loads of trolls and bigots. RolandR (talk) 00:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. GedUK  13:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – high profile disambiguation page being vandalized. Semi or PC requested. Gaijin42 (talk) 23:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one IP vandalizing, who is now on their final warning. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Due to repeated disruptive editing by an IP user. Claiming that both nationalities should be listed (which is both Icelandic and American), but the football project has excluded listing both nationalities for players with dual nationality and only lists their FIFA nationality (that is the team they play for). – Michael (talk) 00:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Warned about edit warring. — MusikAnimal talk 06:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (T) @ 02:18, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mike V • Talk 02:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – The current title is again disputed in the talk page. George Ho (talk) 22:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The page hasn't been moved since July and the move discussion tapered off about 21 December. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Indefinite request. Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English), "The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources (for example other encyclopedias and reference works, scholarly journals and major news sources)." The use of diacritics are not used in the romanization of the word by the BBC, TIME, The New York Times, China Daily, Cambridge University, etc. all cite the term as being 'sheng nu'. Other editors have twice moved, and brought up more than one on the talk page, that they would like to apply a partial spelling (not even the complete) pinyin "sheng nü" as the article title. While it may be correct against the rules of pinyin as per their interpretation, it is not the widely cited romanization of the word. As per Wikipedia policy, the reliable references prevail. Mkdwtalk 21:34, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Haz talk 01:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:50, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. The Haz talk 01:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 23:35, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: All other planet articles (i.e Jupiter) are semi-protected and this one should be too. An edit war happened here before, an admin put full protection, but when he removed it, he forgot to put the semi-protection back. Tetra quark (don't be shy) 23:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:38, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The subject is in the midst of a political controversy and the page is being persistently vandalised by IP users. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 20:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:02, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism over a fair few days now. Time to shut it down. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:54, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Spate of virgin accounts and IPs (likely socks) deleting "negative" content. Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 21:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Anger over his comment about Birmingham has caused rage in the UK, so editors are venting on his BLP. Atsme☯Consult 21:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Awards just handed out so now IP make massive disruptive edits adding players they think should be there. QED237 (talk) 20:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:31, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent addition of unsourced content, with this edit of particular note. Edits on this page, 2014 in American television, and List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network about Dan Vs. have been rampant over the past few months, with no end in sight. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 20:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeated disruptive editing by new users and IP addresses. IPadPerson (talk) 19:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Large amount unsourced transfer speculation and vandalism from IPs. --Jaellee (talk) 19:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

14 January 2015

Semi-protection: edit warring from non-static IP without discussion on BLP issues against consensus. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Khadar Khani (talk) 19:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection Unconvinceable IP vandal continues to insist that the cancelled series Dan Vs. is returning to several networks without any sources and has now taken to creating this false season article to continue that campaign. Unless we get any good sourcing the show is returning, there's no reason for this article to exist, and it should be protected to stymie this vandal. Nate • (chatter) 04:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There has been no attempt at recreation. Warn and report disruptive users accordingly. — MusikAnimal talk 17:27, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent replacement of proper fair-use infobox image with copyright violating replacement. Ongoing for about a month. CRRaysHead90 | #RaysUp 03:00, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The disputed image has been deleted twice as copyright violation, while the current image appears to meet fair-use criteria. No need to protect the page. If users continue to submit copyrighted material they should warned and reported to AIV accordingly. — MusikAnimal talk 17:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: User adds some false information without any reference.--Sahehco (talk) 13:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — MusikAnimal talk 17:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism due to a bad call in a game that happened a week and a half ago. No good IP edits since. TomCat4680 (talk) 20:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Bagumba (talk) 20:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Diego Queiroz (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from o sock puppet. The last protection expired, and the vandal returned. Please, protect it permanently or for a larger period of time, since I am not active on this wiki. As in the last request, I must note that the user responsible for the sockpuppetry is the user with the larger number of socks in the history of pt.wiki. Thanks in advance. Diego Queiroz (talk) 18:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked., Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:07, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection IP editor repeatedly trying to insert critique without consensus to do so and edit warring.--MONGO 13:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note Confirmed users on both sides of the debate. I would probably lean toward full-protection, but am instead deferring to another admin. — MusikAnimal talk 18:10, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:36, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected — MusikAnimal talk 18:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent WP:Disruptive editing by an IP; has been at this since December 2013, if he is also this IP, and obviously will not be stopping. The IP comes back every week, few weeks, month, or months, to remove the See also section in the article. It is likely David Blanchflower. Short-term semi-protection won't help much with this IP. Flyer22 (talk) 17:27, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Taking it in small, gradual increments is the procedural and more fair approach. — MusikAnimal talk 18:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The kids have been getting at this page since Jan 6. : Noyster (talk), 16:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:15, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalised by IP and anon editor. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 10:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Inbound attacks by socks of Vgleer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 05:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from multiple IPs for the past several days deriding the team's performance. A. Parrot (talk) 04:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry about that. I copied the wrong example. Fixing now. A. Parrot (talk) 05:51, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:28, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. KH-1 (talk) 04:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Bollywood films, especially ones that are fresh in the public's minds, are heavily disrupted by a well-documented agenda by various production houses to inflate and deflate box office figures to suit their marketing needs. Here are some examples of improper changes: [17], (3 IPs involved here), this edit changes the box office take to 170 crore rupees but the source only speculates that the film will cross 150 crore rupees "by the end of the week".

Requesting 1 month protection from IPs, since this is a semi-recent movie (December 2014ish) that keeps getting updated box office figures without reliable sources. The article would definitely benefit from interested editors requesting changes and providing sources, which we could then scrutinize. And if you want to learn WTF crore is, let me know and I'll drop the science. (1 crore = 10 million) Thanks!. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 17:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 1 week semi protection please there is an IP targeting this page and I don't want to violate the 3 revert rule. . Daniel298289 (talk) 03:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:27, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered user keeps changing (since at least last year) the actress name and placing a link to an obscure blogspot site. PMLF (talk) 18:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Previous semi-protected back on 24 October 2014 for a month due to persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced material from IPs. Everything went calm up unil recently when IPs have continued to vandalism and add unsourced material. Wes Mouse | T@lk 08:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:31, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I guess a day will be enough to let the other guy read the relevant guidelines and stop this silly editwar. The Banner talk 06:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn Edit war stopped and editor is reading (but not accepting yet) the relevant guideline. I file again when needed. The Banner talk 15:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:31, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Is the edit count too high for PC? There is at least one good IP edit. George Ho (talk) 03:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chamith (talk) 02:50, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I notice that vandalism over the years has changed the statistics beyond recognition. It is hard to maintain the page while it is open to vandalism by unregistered IP's. Kautilya3 (talk) 01:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15 January 2015

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – hijacking by "want to post my own resume" editor. Bentogoa (talk) 13:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. also current user was blocked indef as a sockpuppet. -- GB fan 14:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The last acceptable IP edit is 29 December 2014. There has not been one acceptable IP edit this month. George Ho (talk) 10:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see why it's necessary to replace the pending changes. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained reversions/edit warring/unnecessary editing by IP users. Requesting a month to begin with. Thanks. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 22:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:15, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. SLBedit (talk) 23:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. bobrayner (talk) 19:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking. NeilN talk to me 06:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I don't wan't IP's to be able to edit this page can I have it semi protected please. Daniel298289 (talk) 03:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting 3 day semi protection IP keeps editing the page claiming Mr Butler is english however he was born in scotland so he is scottish if I revert any more I would be violating the 3 revert rule. IP has also removed edit warnings off the IP talk page. The ip doing the edits to the page according to the block log was blocked in 2011 for block evasion. The problematic IP is 125.236.54.18 Daniel298289 (talk) 02:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Fast-moving sockpuppetry, difficult to even revert due to conflicts. Manul ~ talk 02:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 00:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Downgrade protection back to Template Editor level. No reason for this to be full-protected.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  08:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 00:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 02:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated disruptive postings by IP editors. Probably but not necessarily sock-puppets of banned or blocked users. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:50, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dcoetzee (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) & User talk:Dcoetzee (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection: Both the user and the user talk page should just be fully protected until the ban has been lifted by WMF-legal. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 15:08, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Neither have been subject to significant disruption since semi-protection has been applied. — MusikAnimal talk 18:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection requested. It's a FA and main page BLP that is attracting strong POV edits that are BLP violations. --DHeyward (talk) 07:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Purported POV pusher is autoconfirmed anyway, so semi or pending changes wouldn't accomplish anything. — MusikAnimal talk 17:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered user keeps vandalizing the page, he has vandalized it at least 3 times in the last 24 hours by changing the actress name to a fake one. The same unregistered user also vandalized my user page. PMLF (talk) 06:36, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 17:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection IP sockpuppets of Shulinjiang continues his campaign of edit warring while leaving racially abusive edit summaries. Short term semi protection only deters him until it expires after which he keeps coming back. A more longer term page protection might be necessary Pvpoodle (talk) 05:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. We'll consider other options as necessary. As it stands now, going by the book there's not enough ongoing disruption to warrant semi-protection. — MusikAnimal talk 17:48, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection IP sockpuppets of Shulinjiang continues his campaign of edit warring while leaving racially abusive edit summaries. Short term semi protection only deters him until it expires after which he keeps coming back. A more longer term page protection might be necessary Pvpoodle (talk) 05:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Not fair to protect page because of one user. We can look into other means if this continues, but from the looks of it blocking seems best. — MusikAnimal talk 17:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16 January 2015

Indefinite semi-protection: There was an edit war here, and after the protection ran its course, an IP picked it back up. Temporary not good enough. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 19:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Previous protection request involving this page was denied due to the fact that the issue was sockpuppetry, and covered too many pages. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 20:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 20:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Qxukhgiels (talk) 18:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. — MusikAnimal talk 20:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mirkotor (talk) 18:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 20:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Bentogoa (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected — MusikAnimal talk 20:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are continuously adding unsourced after asked to stop several times. User:Spreadofknowledge 10:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. It looks to me less like IPs vandalising but two confirmed editors edit warring. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BLP. User:Vigyani 12:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several new accounts are removing well sourced content. Article has been protected 4 times recently. But more new accounts come once the protection expires. . User:Vigyani 12:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are continuously adding unsourced information regarding the box-office performances of Kumar's films. . Skr15081997 (talk) 08:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent POV vandalism from anon IP. --Taivo (talk) 12:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of subjective/BLPvio content by anons and users, presumably fans of the subject, despite revets and warnings. Blake Gripling (talk) 11:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Though infrequent, almost all recent anonymous edits to the article are unhelpful vandalism. See history of the article. PC should also work. Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 09:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same IP block evasion by Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Ararat_arev that led to the previous month-long protection on this article. McGeddon (talk) 11:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BLP. User:Vigyani 08:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over "miniseries" vs "Mini-series" has gone on for over a week now. Gloss 22:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've warned them both for edit warring, if they continue please report to WP:ANEW. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Khadar Khani (talk) 05:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I came here to report same. Gaff (talk) 06:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Don't see a pressing need to override the semi protection, you can talk to the protecting admin about increasing their own protection if you think it needs it. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of original research and unsourced claims concerning highly advertised television series and its constantly changing presenting panel. livelikemusic my talk page! 03:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not seeing enough edits been reverted to warrant protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – this is also semi-protected. George Ho (talk) 21:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

George Ho has strangely accused me of edit warring when I have not made any edits to the page in more than 24 hours, during which I have been calmly discussing the proposed edits on the related talk page. The timing seems strange and unwarranted. I would appreciate User:George Ho explaining the basis for this odd request, as well as his unnecessary warnings on my page.--7157.118.25a (talk) 22:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I must have misread the history log. It did occur on the 14th, not the 15th. Please forgive me for giving you the notice too late, although I still think a warning is warranted. --George Ho (talk) 22:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, not a problem, 14th vs. 15th is an easy misreading. I am trying to resolve the issue through discussion though and am holding off on making any changes to the page barring WP:Consensus. --7157.118.25a (talk) 22:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now. If the edit warring continues let me know and I'll take action. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent IP edits by the banned user Ararat arev. A. Parrot (talk) 00:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like the protection didn't take the first time around, so I repeated it. Favonian (talk) 09:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: User Numerounovedant (talk · contribs) is repeatedly changing a huge amount of content and adding puffery and is not ready to listen to anyone.--FrankBoy (Buzz) 20:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done User warned for 3RR vio, if they continue report to WP:ANEW or AIV after being warned for promotional editing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Initially protected due to an edit war which occurred last month. Also, the playoffs are now finished, so I doubt there will be any extensive editing. Aerospeed (Talk) 00:29, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Please ask the protecting admin (at User talk:EdJohnston) before coming here. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – continued regular nonsense edits by IPs and new accounts. Group in the news worldwide again. The proposed level would allow constructive inputs (there have been a few) while limiting destructive ones. Legacypac (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Given the contentious nature of the topic I don't see it being calm for long periods at a time. It's likely it will need semi in the future but hopefully PC will do for now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term issues with IPs messing around with this article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully by then people will have given up on last year, if not let me know and I'll semi it for longer. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Level of IP vandalism increasing especially on case counts. BrianGroen (talk) 18:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – roving ip deliberately inserting false info, multiple targets in past, this seems to be the current one. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. (semi for three months). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: COI editor moving between different IPs and repeatedly replacing unflattering, sourced content with promotional puffery. Stesmo (talk) 03:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, Stesmo. I was just about to report this matter here. Flyer22 (talk) 05:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles 06:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Moderately edited article subject to plenty of vandalism/OR. Has been semiprotected three times, most recently last month. Indef PC protection seems to be the least level of protection warranted, an indef semiprotection may be a discretionary call as well. Deadbeef 03:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See if that calms it down, let me know if it continues and I'll chuck a longer protection in it. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection:frequent vandalism.LM2000 (talk) 01:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To try and calm down current bout.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Given longer term nature and the next time. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – Unexplained moves from a disruptive user without any consensus as to why. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Blakegripling ph: Please consider warning them and AIV as well. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks and related IPs repeatedly whitewashing article, removing anything that could be negative, and making false claims of libel / defamation etc. . Nathan T 21:52, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Courcelles 06:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - anonymous IP editors returns each day to add unsourced content to this WP:BLP. - Cwobeel (talk) 21:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Open case that was recently manipulated by a sock of the accused. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sock of accused has already been blocked. Bgwhite (talk) 22:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive amount of vandalism very recently, seems to be happening one right after another from IPs. — Maile (talk) 19:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by Ooh-ya-ah-yoo and some unregistered users. Firetopaz (talk) 09:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 22:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of speculation being added about a move to Arsenal. JMHamo (talk) 18:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator IronGargoyle.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Repeated removal of the article's infobox picture without discussion on talk page or an explanation. IPadPerson (talk) 17:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Too much of IP editors making unsourced changes. Template:Chicago Cubs roster has indefinite protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Bgwhite (talk) 21:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 08:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, It appears to be the same IP. take action against them for edit warring or vandalism rather than protecting the page. GedUK  12:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Look at the usernames with numeral figures and generic names. Gh87 in the public computer (talk) 01:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The page is pending changes protected, given that the last unconstructive edit was around 10 days ago. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Can you perhaps extend PC protection then? --George Ho (talk) 11:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: A Malaysian dynamic IP continues to vandalize this article. HkCaGu (talk) 01:04, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Page has more chances of COI and vandal changes now that the person has been involved in a highly volatile Delhi elections. Expect at least non-confirmed users to be excluded from editing this page.  A m i t  웃   21:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Probably because of the playoffs, this page is getting way too much vandalism etc. for PC to keep up with. Requesting semiprotection for a few weeks, potentially up to a week or so after the super bowl. Deadbeef 21:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated disruptive removal and mangling of content by IP and COI account. W. P. Uzer (talk) 18:47, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've semi-protected for three days and warned the IP. Sarah (SV) (talk) 19:09, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Bentogoa (talk) 14:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Sarah (SV) (talk) 19:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection An editor has a single-minded fixation on restoring the article (a BLP) to a specific version which includes typos and broken links. Attempts at communication have failed. Editor was banned, but continues to revert from a floating IP address. Grayfell (talk) 21:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I blocked the whole /64 that he can bounce around in. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18 January 2015

Indefinite Semi-protection: The page has a recurring level of IP vandalism. The IP address User:49.145.186.162 adds some poor details on that article. TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 07:25, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:25, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent unexplained removal of content, unexplained introduction of unsourced content, as evidenced by this edit, which has been re-done several times as of this writing. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 06:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - appears to be manageable right now - if activity picks up please do resubmit. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP addresses continue to make disruptive edits. This article was previously semi-protected due to the same problem and due to sockpuppetry. . T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 05:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruptive editing from IP addresses; ignoring notes and policies concerning BLP's. livelikemusic my talk page! 18:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:07, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Request temporary full protection due to WP:Meatpuppetry, the likes of which unfortunately drove Featured Article writer, editor Neelix, off this website Wikipedia. Thank you. — Cirt (talk) 18:21, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - very regrettable set of circumstances. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP users. IPadPerson (talk) 16:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - also warned IP address PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Somebody is repeatedly adding links to a very problematic webpage. These links fail WP:EL, and the webpage is just a lengthy paranoid rant that appears to have BLP problems among other things.

Problem has been happening for over a month. Link seems to be added by a single person, but their IPs are dynamic so blocking isn't a viable option. bobrayner (talk) 12:38, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - if this person keeps up for a couple more days I would suggest re-applying but given that they only appear to have inserted it twice this month, it appears manageable right now. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Widr (talk) 17:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anonymous vandalism from several addresses since yesterday. Dai Pritchard (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been vandalized several times over the past few weeks. Always the same vandalism edit. Former member of the band who tries to harm the band just before the release of a new album. ArtemisOfMars (talk) 17:29, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Given that every editor involved in this dispute appears to have a conflict of interest, and it is being discussed on the BLP noticeboard I am fully protecting this until a consensus has been reached. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Vandalism – Not registrated ip always edit a wrong information. Pakcikfarhan:v 05:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - there appears to be unexplained and disruptive edits, but nowhere near enough to justify indefinite protection, nor is it necessarily vandalism. Please do engage the other editors in dialogue during this time. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:38, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Full protection: I hereby request the article to be protected to due constant vandalism and edit war. The audio file is inappropriate and it is not up to Wikipedia's standards. HumanCapacitator (talk) 04:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - I have no idea what 4chan want with this one, but it's fully protected for one week to see if contentious editing can be resolved. User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry actually put the audio file up for deletion this morning. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Full protection: - continued bickering over article picture over last few days.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - contentious editing appears to be done by IPs, rather than autoconfirmed users. Autoconfirmed users appear to be (albeit contentiously) interacting with others. This should allow for the image to be deleted or kept on Commons. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There's absolutely no point in edit-warring over the issue; the discussion is happening, and any change should be made when it reaches a conclusion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - hopefully consensus will have been achieved by that point PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is a Muslim political party, and gets attacked by both pro-Islam and anti-Islam groups. The only activity going on in the page is vandalism and reverts of vandalism. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - As this has been going on for so long with no positive contribution from the IP editors, I have put this as two months. I've also warned the gentleman/lady who decided that calling them a terrorist organisation was a good thing to do. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:12, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Only two IP addresses appear to be doing this, but with a gusto. They've both been given warnings and if this behaviour comes up again I suggest flagging both for blocks. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:19, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: frequent nonconstructive edits.LM2000 (talk) 08:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:23, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP user continually adding huge lists of cars in violation of WP:GAMECRUFT despite myself and 2 other editors reverting him, with 2 of us explaining our reasons. User has now taken to deleting references and continues to add excessively detailed lists of cars. Bertaut (talk) 07:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - I have written on the IP's talk page, asking them to engage you in dialogue on the talk page of the article. I would urge you and the other editors to do the same at either venue. This person probably has no clue what's going on. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continued edit warring after the previous full protection expired about 24 hours ago. Gloss 06:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:23, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by Shirt58. tutterMouse (talk) 08:19, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please see Special:Contributions/EvaAndressa (as well as the user's deleted contributions) and this edit filter log. MJ94 (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely by Jimfbleak. tutterMouse (talk) 14:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by sock using three IPs over the past three days. Temp blocks ineffective, they just keep coming back under a new IP or reusing one whose block has expired. ―Mandruss ☎ 17:40, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. by Ronhjones. tutterMouse (talk) 08:21, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Philippe (WMF) (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Evasion by banned editor. Tgeairn (talk) 06:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected - I got it. :) Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 06:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BLP. User:Vigyani 13:33, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 00:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Article has been vandalized repeatedly over the last few days - making the same or related vandalism edit, but from a different IP or unconfirmed account each time. --MelanieN (talk) 06:51, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 00:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. An IP editor who appears to be connected with this company has over a long period of time continued to add badly-sourced and promotional material about it and to remove sourced criticism. I'd protect it myself but I'm too WP:INVOLVED. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:35, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Choosing the shorter duration is simply procedural, in the philosophy that given time, perhaps disruption will pass and we can open the article back up for all users to edit. We can always protect again moving forward if need be. — MusikAnimal talk 23:56, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of an unsourced title for a forthcoming film. (This article and several others have seen 5 different unsourced titled floated by various IPs.). SummerPhD (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 23:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A constant target for the Persian Gulf naming dispute . Sam Sing! 01:04, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 23:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19 January 2015

Extend pending changes: There is one revert this month, but it's seldom edited. Nevertheless, not one IP has been accepted since PC was enabled. --George Ho (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:30, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Baseball player whose transaction has not been finalized. TM 15:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Tito☸Dutta 21:29, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection from Indefinite protection – This is silly. No new articles can be added by experienced editors then. And there is no visibility of vandalism also which warranted the original protection. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 06:44, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected for now, pending a response at User talk:CambridgeBayWeather#Template:Mariah Carey. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:28, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unsourced changes by IP users; addition of content with fake source, and edit warring. Jytdog (talk) 18:31, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. I noticed the IP warring to insert negative content to the lead. So far the talk page doesn't seem to show the use of a 'fake source.' Perhaps you could clarify that on talk. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:14, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Google Doodle and holiday related vandalism. Safiel (talk) 17:22, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – One week by User:Acalamari. EdJohnston (talk) 19:17, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi EdJohnston, that was a protection I performed a year ago. The page is currently unprotected. Acalamari 19:27, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected – Oops. Now semiprotected for an actual week here in 2015. Always good to remember what year it is. EdJohnston (talk) 19:31, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs mucking around with the template despite being reverted by multiple users. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:28, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unsourced changes by IP users. Particularly, one IP is now insisting on inserting a cartoon character as a "commander" in the conflict... RGloucester — ☎ 18:24, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 18:35, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:16, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. - Given that it's only been a day, I think you should be able to discuss this amongst yourselves, but if it becomes intractable please do resubmit or consider dispute resolution. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism, dispute since yesterday. Pages needs to be protected till the issue is solved which is being discussed [18] . A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 08:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. - I've asked both users to discuss the issue further rather than bicker it out with edits and reverts. If they don't, please, please, please resubmit and consider dispute resolution. Trying to assume good faith in their ability to talk for a first attempt. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer speculation coming in about a potential move to Turkey, but nothing is confirmed yet. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:09, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Fairly well-viewed page that has a massive history of being vandalized. There are a few good IP/new account edits though, and the vandalism is generally slow enough for PC to do its job. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looking at the history, the vandals appear to get bored quite quickly so this is a quick patch for boredoms sake. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism over the past week by new accounts, especially blanking and content removal. This has increased since it was nominated for deletion. --The one that forgot (talk) 08:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - it's not just IP addresses and new accounts who are blanking it, I've protected it for one week which should allow for the AfD to finish. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - NQ (talk) 11:59, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - I don't think the sockpuppet investigation is going to go anywhere unfortunately. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Although edits are low, not one IP edit has been acceptable during PC since semi-protection expired. George Ho (talk) 09:19, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued buffalo related vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of One month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 08:32, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP article has recently been ambushed by a lot of vandalism; with the Seattle Seahawks making it to the Super Bowl, a 2-3 week semi-protection is recommended. DPH1110 (talk) 06:09, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of One month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 08:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi protect -- An anon IP continues to change the birthdate to make the person younger, despite a cited interview with the subject in Newsday. He has been warned, and yet continues add the uncited personal claim.--Tenebrae (talk) 03:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of Two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 08:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users and registered users are simply disrupting the article with vandalism. Updating results that didn't happen or writing unnecessary stuff. It will probably get worse as the main event approaches. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 02:42, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of One week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 08:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – At least two users, both of which are confirmed, and a few IPs (I'm not sure exactly how many) have added winners of the AFC and NFC championships before the games were over. I expect such edits to continue for some time. – Majora4 (leave a message) 02:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Bgwhite (talk) 08:08, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:38, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 07:55, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent minor vandalism – Although edits are low, but due his work in a new country some silly vandalism is often added to the page. Rf_fangirl (talk)

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Move-warring during ongoing RM. Should be protected until a result at the RM is decided. RGloucester — ☎ 07:19, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Excessive sockpuppetry - Used to bypass create protection at Um Vichet, Um Vichet (footballer), and Um Vichet (goalkeeper). Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:50, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Bgwhite (talk) 07:46, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Excessive sockpuppetry - Used to by-pass create protection at Sok Chanrasmey and Sok Chanraksmey. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:48, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Bgwhite (talk) 07:46, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary SEMI protection: WP:SALT repetitive creation of SPAM. Gaff (talk) 23:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected – Already salted. EdJohnston (talk) 05:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. bobrayner (talk) 22:36, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 07:50, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:36, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 month. EdJohnston (talk) 05:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 1 week semi needed as a vandal keeps adding extra names that where not part of band aid 30. . Daniel298289 (talk) 23:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Adding the semi template so the archive bot will take away this request. EdJohnston (talk) 05:48, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of 5th grade humour. . Sam Sing! 23:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 year. EdJohnston (talk) 05:50, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. It appears that the same person with multiple IPs is changing the Location of the Rugova canion to Serbia while in reality it is located in Kosovo Gjirokastra15 (talk) 19:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The same person (one account, multiple IPs) is playing similar tricks at Peć, too. I think that both pages would benefit from some kind of protection. Semiprotection would greatly reduce, but not eliminate, the disruption. bobrayner (talk) 13:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done seeing as @HJ Mitchell: has put in a rangeblock I'm fairly sure this isn't going to be a problem anymore. I'll let him comment if this isn't true. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The rangeblock will solve the immediate problem. The sockmaster will get round it, but by then they'll probably be targeting a new article, so I agree with the decline. Obviously if things change, come straight back. 18:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – New countries are rare, but people keep adding them to this list even though consensus at the main List of sovereign states is these groups are not countries. Full protection would ensure that only agreed new states get added, and then by an admin. Once on this list, a country will never leave it. The page is in great shape, so there is no pressing need for other edits. . Legacypac (talk) 18:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - Edits appear to be very spaced out and appears to be manageable at the moment. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism due to him agreeing to move club in JULY!. JMHamo (talk) 16:35, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism after recent page protection had ended. Bossanoven (talk) 22:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1001 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Player about to change club. QED237 (talk) 22:29, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:37, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Astroturfing from anonymous ip editors, most of which are only editing the articles of this Israeli adware company, the page of its main product InstallCore, and the page of an Israeli charity Jeremy's Circle, founded by the VP of Communications for IronSource, Pamela Becker. [1][2]. Little Professor (talk) 21:16, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Resumption of edit warring by VictorD7 and continued by Gamaliel even after the article been protected twice over the same passage. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 20:23, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agreed. I really don't know what to do here. This is controversial material that is under heated discussion on talk by numerous parties. If I leave it in, he claims there's "consensus" to include it because no one is taking it out, and if I take it out, then I'm "edit warring". Gamaliel (talk) 20:26, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the record, the consensus I speak of was in the past, when the segment stood unchallenged for a month and unmentioned on the talk page. Contrary to Gamaliel's claim, I have never claimed simply leaving it while a discussion about it progresses constitutes a consensus. There has certainly never been a consensus for removing it, however, and yet Gamaliel has repeatedly tried to remove it through sheer edit warring, despite opposition by multiple posters. He initiated the edit warring. Even today, after Casprings and I reached a temporary agreement to let the segment remain while it's discussed, Gamaliel rushed in to revert Casprings and delete the material. VictorD7 (talk) 21:04, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary fullprotection: High level of IP vandalism. Deunanknute (talk) 19:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:26, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP for an Indian soccer player in Norway. IP editors (and probably the guy himself) keeps changing his career statistics without sourcing it. They add a league match when he's only played a training match and so on, in conflict with WP:FOOTY consensus. Cashewnøtt (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection:  – We generally semi-protect all year pages here. See Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/2014 and other pages. Now, we are in 2015. Regards. Tito Dutta (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:19, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's introducing original researches. Vin09 (talk) 09:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The IP address has been warned. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Very hard sources. 333-blue 09:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. (although I understand this is a widely used template) PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:47, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Once again, persistent slow-mo editwarring by one IP-hopper against what consensus says is against WP:NPOV. Page has been semi-protected for increasing periods of time (3 days, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months), but once it ends they just come back. ansh666 08:25, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:32, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism (various IPs) – 8 instances in the last 3-4 days: [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26]. kashmiri TALK 16:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 December, the article was protected for 1 week. Now Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Regards --Tito Dutta (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A stream of IP addresses suspected of banned sockpupput of MD iet are making disruptive edits using IP addresses.

Please see sockpuppet investigation of user:Md iet. Summichum (talk) 15:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I bring this up because this disambiguation page has had virtually no constructive editing by new and unregistered users over the past year. I question if it is worth the effort having this page pending changes protected and if it would be more convenient having the page simply semi-protected. This is more than a high level of vandalism, after all - it is absolute and it is suited more for semi-protection. --The one that forgot (talk) 08:36, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - agreed, though with the proviso that this should be reviewed, rather than indef. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:56, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – WP:SALT for this relating to a vandalism move. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:56, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued disruptive (and unexplained) reinstatement of improperly verified BLP (that is, fan page for not independently notable member of a group) by likely fan. Drmies (talk) 15:47, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Tito Dutta (talk) 16:14, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 03:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This event will take place on 25 Jan. Let's semi-protect it till 27 Jan, then we'll see. I'll also watch the page. Regards. ---- Tito Dutta (talk) 14:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Frequent and recurring target by Malusia22, a banned sockpuppeteer. Blake Gripling (talk) 04:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 year. EdJohnston (talk) 19:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users. IP users are changing information without providing sources. Requesting 2 weeks of protection.Pinokk1(talk) 10:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Quillercouch and User talk:Quillercouch

Please:

See m:WMF Global Ban Policy/List (which is Poetlister).--GZWDer (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Ymblanter (talk) 11:42, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users. IP users are changing information without providing sources. Requesting 2 weeks of protection. GoldenBoy25 (talk) 01:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., please reapply here if this is not going to be sufficient.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and WP:BLP violations. I'd do it myself but I could be construed as WP:INVOLVED.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You may request to extend protection later. Regards Tito Dutta (talk) 08:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Absolution provider 1999 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – sockpuppet and other issues. Legacypac (talk) 21:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:23, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Doesn't need to move. 333-blue 13:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you requesting for move protection (it's been protected since 2008) or for the protection to be dropped? tutterMouse (talk) 18:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done due to lack of response to the above question. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:26, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21 January 2015

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandalism as last times. The page was not even unprotected for a day and the same "I'm going to add this fictional character" bullshit happened again. This needs indefinite semi protection.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Changes: Content changing over nationality, family, name spelling/pronunciation and other issues. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 18:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations; sorry, but I don't know if semi-, full, or pending changes is the best option here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:22, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:26, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every edit in 2015 appears to have been reverted as vandalism. -- ferret (talk) 17:26, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts appears to go back farther than the beginning of this year. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:56, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Dispute over sources needs to be discussed instead of reverted. -- Moxy (talk) 18:10, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - I see the block didn't do anything to dissuade one of the editors. I have given them both final warnings. If they start being disruptive or keep swearing at each other, please do let me know. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:50, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours. QED237 (talk) 12:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Tito Dutta (talk) 16:51, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I'm requesting protection for the 18th Street page because there is high level of vandalism and unsoured edits. Users seem to be creating one time accounts to added content with out providing a source, and also removing or blanking the page. I am requesting 3 months of protection. I think after 3 months the page should be okay. - BlueRedPurpleGreen (talk) 05:51, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - it appears to have calmed down in the last week. I have warned the user who inserted unreferenced material this week and have asked that they consider discussing the issue on the talk page. If it picks up again, please feel free to re-post and I'm sure it'll be protected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:56, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring and IP hopping, even removing the changes that were made by a bot. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Tito Dutta (talk) 15:34, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:53rd Syedna succession controversy (Dawoodi Bohra) (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The user with ip starting from 106 is disrupting bohra articles talk pages and is suspected of sockpuppet of user md iet , please see his spi investigation page where all his ip addresses are reported. Summichum (talk) 04:51, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - Md iet has been blocked, and the article itself is protected until the 20th of April which should allow for as many sockpuppet investigations as are needed to deal with this. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 10:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Mohammed Burhanuddin (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The user with ip starting from 106 is disrupting bohra articles and is suspected of sockpuppet of user md iet , please see his spi investigation page where all his ip addresses are reported. Summichum (talk) 04:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done- the SPI investigation is still open on that single IP address but they don't appear to be causing enough trouble to warrant a block and certainly not enough trouble to warrant anything as drastic as protecting a talk page. If the SPI finds them to be a sockpuppet, they'll be blocked, which should solve it! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 10:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:116.193.159.51 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Block talk page access while block is in place for TP vandalism. DHeyward (talk) 07:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extend pending changes: Can anyone else here extend protection time? The protecting administrator declined my request. The article still faces vandalism. --George Ho (talk) 06:35, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unresponsive IP editor making unconstructive edits. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 01:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Seeing as you gave them many a warning, they've been blocked for 1 week. I suggest you start a proper layout of why this is wrong on the talk page for when they can edit again (just a suggestion though). PanydThe muffin is not subtle 10:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption from IPs. Users keep adding the unsourced episodes Serpent Hunt in spite of numerous reversions. User is IP hopping, so I can't adequately contact them for discussion. Diffs: [27][28][29][30] four different IPs. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:30, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 10:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: prolonged and continuous vandalism by anonymous IP on B-class biography article. ibensis (What’s the Story?) 00:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 10:24, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Because of the ethnic conflicts in the area, since early October 2014 this article has been a battleground for Kurds, Turks, and Syrians, who have been constantly changing it (and Ulukaya's nationality) to suit their agendas. I had to request temporary semi-protection in October, but many of the nationality warriors have been registering accounts. I've been spending more than 5 or 6 hours a month dealing with this, and would appreciate indefinite pending changes protection. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I can't see a single productive edit by a new account or IP address for months. I've semi protected this to save everyone a lot of time that otherwise would be wasted on pending changes. New autoconfirmed account was blocked. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 10:20, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Apparently someone else with the same name has died, and people keep claiming it's this person - without any sources. Squinge (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Tito Dutta (talk) 02:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: After a registered user (Rcandre85) was blocked, over the past week several IP addresses have persistently reverted the article to a specific revision from November which has promotional problems, typos, and dead links. Communication attempts have failed. An IPv6 range was also blocked,[31] but they're still at it. Grayfell (talk) 22:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I blocked the IPv6 range again, as well as the IPv4 that's clearly the same person, for a week. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Adding matches and quotes with no sources available, as well as vandalism. TheMeaningOfBlah (talk) 22:15, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined brand new article; doesn't even have a talk page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring involving redundant information, the war starter (Vaselineeeeeeee) broke the three-revert rule. This edit war makes no sense as it is just about redundant info (information about Juventus FC being in Serie A). ToonLucas22 (talk) 20:18, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create Protection User keeps crating article after multiple CSD Deletions. Yoshi24517Chat Absent 19:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined three deletions is the usual minimum for salt. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit-warring between various parties has continued for days, even despite a block of both for 31 hours. RGloucester — ☎ 05:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – sockpuppet vandal. Gaff (talk) 00:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined see two sections down. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – sockpuppet vandal target. Gaff (talk) 00:19, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined socks blocked; no activity in ~20 hours HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:42, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please WP:SALT vandal only account is targeting. Gaff (talk) 00:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Last vandalism happened on December 8. Some IP edits are good; vandalism happened on November 2014. Vandalism hasn't happened yet in January. George Ho (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:38, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2 Articles for Semi-Protection

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Request 1 year semi-protection Binx2smooth (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:36, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption – Blanking and edit warring by two ips with same Virgina geolocation. Middayexpress (talk) 22:19, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That would be me. Note the other user Middayexpress is unwilling to discuss his drastic controversial content changes per WP:BRD and instead relies on other tactics to enforce his version. I am fully prepared to demonstrate that the information he keeps repeatedly removing without comment is found in Strabo and Diodorus. 71.246.148.163 (talk) 22:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Only edits since 9 Dec 2014 are hoax edits by roving IP from Columbia trying to create support for resumption of ended TV series Dan Vs. Lots of targets, this is latest. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:10, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, the reason that i want to create that rumors was because The Hub has beem changed to Discovery Family, and i want that Dan Vs. be renewed and moved to Cartoon Network, please, the show is on hiatus, however, Generator Rex s*cks because it is smilar to the horrible Ben 10 series. 190.158.151.28 (talk) 22:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by previous vandal (see history page) reported at WP:ANI. SLBedit (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Changing BLP details with no, or unreliable, sources (transfer gossip). Article has previously been protected many times for the same reason (see log). Merely protecting it during transfer windows (January and July/August) will not bolt that door, as the log proves that such unfounded gossip has made the page require protection in other months too. '''tAD''' (talk) 21:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of the IP edits over the past year have been disruptive. Unsourced and unexplained numerical changes (often signs of subtle vandalism) appear to be most common. [33][34][35][36]. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:52, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and edits coming thick and fast, with the majority happening too quickly to verify. I've been maintaining the correct results, scores, names, etc for the past few days but would appreciate some protection just until the 24th (when the tournament ends). Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:37, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Please lower so I can make the requested changes as discussed on the talk page. Thank you. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 15:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:13, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by anonymous users. IPadPerson (talk) 03:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Spam. VQuakr (talk) 03:38, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – One of those name articles where people add themselves on a regular basis. Last good edit by an IP was back in August. . Sam Sing! 02:20, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:52, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of poorly sourced voice actor information. Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:50, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was recently unprotected, and the vandalism has returned. Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:48, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:49, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Surge of vandalism in the past couple of days. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 00:20, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:48, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject was arrested and the crazies have come out to gloat. A week or so and this should blow over. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Colombian IPs have been disrupting the article for the past two days. A prime suspect would be Gabucho181. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant messes made by IPs, including tons of unsourced changes. This has been going on for weeks. I'm tired of having to see people revert them. RGloucester — ☎ 17:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Page sees constant, incessant vandalism from IP vandals, especially those from school IPs.--Mr Fink (talk) 16:54, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It is true that the history of the article contains a large amount of vandalism by newly registered or unregistered editors, but among recent edits this is a fairly small proportion of all editing, and there are also some constructive IP edits which would be lost if the article were protected. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Saqib (talk) 12:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected — MusikAnimal talk 19:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Destiny is one of 2014's biggest video game releases and it attracts a lot of IP and new users to the article. Changes include vandalism, not following WP:MOS and adding WP:GAMEGUIDE like material. Soetermans. T / C 11:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unreferenced content. . Dcbanners (talk) 11:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:32, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection – occasional but long-term vandalism, removing an unpopular album from the discography. Floating IP insists on removing it. Bretonbanquet (talk) 10:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 19:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs making a mess for no apparent reason. This battle is hot right now, so I'm not surprised. . RGloucester — ☎ 07:23, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Registered editors also involved. — MusikAnimal talk 19:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two new accounts vandalizing the page in short succession. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the activity has calmed down since I requested protection. Keeping open in case it flares up after I check out for the night; decline if prudent. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 06:40, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Edit war on his fine in 2011. StandNThrow (talk) 06:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An anon continues to add unsourced information to the article and doesn't seem to understand that personal research about the subject without a reference is not a RS and is now edit warring over the issue. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Protected by MusikAnimal: I am just recording the fact.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection for a couple of days. Edit warring over changing a redirect to a page that was deleted at AfD over POV concerns, with some appearance of canvassing offsite. Please see also WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Lagoy. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done In fact, I have fully protected the article indefinitely. If and when there is a consensus to overturn the earlier consensus, the article can be unprotected. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:05, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Subject of transfer speculation/ongoing talks. Lot of premature edits by IP users. Mosmof (talk) 21:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 18:53, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The attacks on Emerson continue. Poorly sourced material is being cited (dating back to 1999 that does not include statements used) to discredit this BLP. Atsme☯Consult 01:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:23, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Dispute over tone and sources needs to be discussed instead of reverted. Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:36, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by IPs with disruptive editing, refusal to go to the talk page. (N.B. Longobardia, which has the same issues, was semi-protected yesterday) Alex2006 (talk) 12:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the problem returns after that, blocking the IP addresses may be worth trying, though the fact that the IP editor has used very different IP addresses may suggest that doing so could be ineffective. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

semi protection a dynamic IP edit warring because they claim 2 of the major newspapers in India are not as reliable as they are. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 06:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP-hopper repeatedly adding unsourced assertions that this is a hoax. AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also, I have warned the IP editor of a possible block. Please feel welcome to contact me if the same problem continues. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An ip-shifting anon is removing a maintenance template, always without explanation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That will not likely affect the IP-hopping account, but thanks anyhow. I will request if any further activity is seen on the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Still happening within five days after protection ended. George Ho (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 07:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High levels of IP stupidity. I mean "vandalism." Same thing. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Keith D. — MusikAnimal talk 07:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Due to the controversy still surrounding SeaWorld, recommend pending changes protection to keep uncited and non-neutral edits out of the article until verified by others. --. McDoobAU93 15:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit rate too high for pending changes at times — MusikAnimal talk 07:07, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Page is currently subject to pending changes, but that hasn't really worked because it has been vandalized a dozen times in the past 24 hours. Subject is an NFL coach in the midst of a controversy leading up to the Super Bowl on Feb. 1. I would suggest semi protection until at least after the game. -- Calidum 06:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. That should be fun - don't hesitate to call back then. The page is still on indefinite PC1. -- zzuuzz (talk) 06:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PC is handling it fine. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 500+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 19:46, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- zzuuzz (talk) 06:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: 400+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 05:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 05:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --palmiped |  Talk  21:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:RolandR (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalised with violently abusive language several hundred times. RolandR (talk) 22:51, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zero0000. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tetra quark (don't be shy) 02:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is at AfD, part of which is also a copyright violation. IPs keep re-inserting the copyrighted material. Suggest Semi-prot until the AfD is decided at least. . CrowCaw 23:36, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done by GB fan. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by IPs, refusal to comply with WP:BRD and to go to the talk page (same as above). Alex2006 (talk) 12:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Alessandro57: Just wanted to point out BRD is nothing you can force on others nor is it something that they are required to follow. Nonetheless the edit war seems to be provoked only by this string of IPs which I believe warrants a brief period of semi-protection. — MusikAnimal talk 21:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23 January 2015

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SLBedit (talk) 20:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 21:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP repeatedly adding BLP Violating material to the page. Kyohyi (talk) 20:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Slimvirgin. Bjelleklang - talk 21:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 1) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Possible sock activity as well (users with '2015' as part of username) ‖ Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 19:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 21:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gloss 18:35, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 21:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sharp uptick in vandalism as anniversary date of Medal of Honor action is nearing. — Maile (talk) 17:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 21:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – The past fews days have seen eratic moves at this page. I filed an RM/TR request to return it to the status quo title, to allow for discussion, but I think move protection is also appropriate. RGloucester — ☎ 17:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Bjelleklang - talk 20:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IPs in Pakistan keep adding links purporting to offer free downloads of the game. Temporary protection will probably prompt them to go elsewhere and leave the article alone. --. McDoobAU93 15:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - having said that, might be a good idea to report the link at the filter either now or if they go at it again. Recent users have been warned. Blocking them should solve it if they start again. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The subject is close to a transfer to Real Madrid, so every anon is adding it to the page, although there's no official announcement yet. MYS77 ✉ 17:31, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 20:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Bentogoa (talk) 17:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wifione Message 17:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Similar to Destiny (video game) I requested for page protection yesterday, Unity is one of 2014's biggest video game releases. Part of the popular Assassin's Creed franchise, it was released a little over two months ago. It was met with mixed reception, because of bugs (see Ubisoft's responses). It attracts a lot of IPs and new users, ranging from erroneous edits to vandalism. Soetermans. T / C 15:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There appear to be IP and new editors trying to make productive edits, so I don't want to protect this for any longer than is absolutely necessary. The conflagration of recent IP edits though means at least short term protection is needed. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated insertion of an infobox against consensus [37][38][39][40] where a FA review determined it was not necessary (version at passing FAC). Protecting will help changes be discussed; blocking the IP won't and socking may be easy or even accidental. See also WP:ANI#Uncivil IP. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - what the actual heck? If they don't sort it on the talk page I'm fairly sure ANI is going to mop up this one. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:12, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term semi protection needed for an article that frequently attracts pretty much every type of basic vandalism you can think of. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Persistent reverting of edits – Continuous reversions on the page so 'SWI' is listed as a chart. This is being committed by two users who continue to revert edits. (121.220.17.230 (talk) 11:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GedUK  12:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Vandalism from IP and new user. Controversial person. IP edits are done to make fun of him. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 15:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Can you clarify this, please? Which edits are the ones you regard as BLP policy violations, and how do they "make fun of him"? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, No response so declining. GedUK  12:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi-protection due to ongoing vandalism. . — Cirt (talk) 01:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  12:17, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IP's disruptively changing names on the contestants list. Gloss 01:08, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - the IP address seems to think they are following policy so please do engage them in discussion. I'll leave a note on the talk page. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extend pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Protection will end soon. --George Ho (talk) 04:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: This article is currently under a restriction of 1 revert per 24 hours (due to previous vandalism/edit warring. Currently there is persistent alteration of the date of death to the wrong date as noted in the talk page). Suggest full protection for 24 hours. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 04:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There is consensus at the talk page about time, if it continues to get reverted pls ask for administrator intervention. Otherwise, I do not think is not a good idea to fully protect the article now. Vandalism obviously can be reverted without 1RR restriction.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued unsourced and vandalistic edits by IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts. RGloucester — ☎ 19:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued change of sourced info by anon IPs. Dismas|(talk) 04:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Beehive frenzy because of gaffe - whole sections are being removed - BLP violations are having to be reverted. Atsme☯Consult 23:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by dynamic IP resumed after protection ended. QED237 (talk) 22:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same day that protection expires, we immediately get exactly the same sort of vandalism that caused the protection to be necessary in the first place. Quite why it was only protected for 48 hours is beyond me. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP disruption of sources and the artist's name. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 05:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and new user vandalism, including socks. Please protect so IPs and recently-registered users cannot edit the article. Dan56 (talk) 21:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 January 21 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Prill (3rd nomination) et al. Bellerophon talk to me 10:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 10:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 January 21 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Prill (3rd nomination) et al. Bellerophon talk to me 10:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 10:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protectionRequesting temporary semi-protection due to ongoing vandalism, by multiple new users and ip. VVikingTalkEdits 09:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Request temporary semi-protection due to recent IP vandalism of article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalizing. SLBedit (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article subject died today and has attracted a lot of attention from ip editors vandalizing the page. Article is also featured on the main page section "In the news". Weedwacker (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors and SPAs have bene persistently altering the spelling of the surname in the article. In recent days we've had [41], [42] and [43], although the disruption dates back much further. The name confusion has been previously discussed at Talk:Rachel_Green#Greene_or_Green, where the outcome was to retain the current spelling because that is the "official" spelling per the broadcaster. Another editor has also expressed exasperation at my talk page over the disruptive edits (see User_talk:Betty_Logan#Rachel_Green). Betty Logan (talk) 23:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See deletion log. Most recent spam Article has now been "userfied" with the userpage then nominated (by a different editor) for CSD, with that then denied. . Gaff (talk) 20:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:29, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Vandalism from IP and new user.--SaməkTalk 20:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No. It's content dispute (unreliable sources, unsourced and Original-Research edits) and the above user used two accounts to edit that article. Abused multiple account policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.158.112.105 (talk) 03:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The most recent protection expired in May 2014; since then it has been repeatedly vandalised. John of Reading (talk) 07:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Cody Rhodes, who has two Twitter accounts (one in character as Stardust, the other being out of character under the name "Hyrule Husky"), yesterday posted under the Stardust account that the Cody Rhodes and Stardust sections on Wikipedia should be split because "it's not the same person." This is clearly in kayfabe mode. The article already had a user add that information. (It wasn't even from an IP.) I suggest that the page be semi-protected so that only experienced users can edit on the page. Thanks! Jgera5 (talk) 18:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We never protect preemptively, but if disruption begins please feel free to re-report. — MusikAnimal talk 22:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - university/college article subject to constant POV vandalism/editing and attempted section-blanking. It's on plenty of watch-lists so requested edits will be actioned quickly. St★lwart111 07:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Or try talking to the one IP deemed disruptive. Added content appeared to be sourced. — MusikAnimal talk 19:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
MusikAnimal, it wasn't - they added a bare URL to the subject's website and claimed that supported their claims while removing news articles and academic sources. And I wasn't just referring to the IP from the last few days - it has been the subject of disruptive editing for a while from IPs and new accounts alike. There's no "content" to dispute. Nonetheless, I'll accept your call but I imagine we'll back back before too long. St★lwart111 22:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of the edits to this article are vandalism. Very few editors seem to be interested in improving it. I don't think much will be lost by preventing IPs from touching it. Parrot of Doom 18:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, pending changes seem to be doing the job already.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request protection as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Pepper - article was recreated as Sam Nicholas Pepper, possibly to circumvent the redir. Gbawden (talk) 12:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — MusikAnimal talk 19:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: high visable template. 333-blue 11:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the template is (and correctly fully protected) but the documentation isn't highly visible at all so doesn't require protection. tutterMouse (talk) 15:04, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Why should the documentation be semi-protected? It is not transcluded with the template, nor has it been subject to persistent disruption — MusikAnimal talk 19:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New editor/anon is adding unsourced information (uniforms) to the article and incorrect values to template. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 19:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New editor/anon is adding unsourced information (uniforms) to the article and incorrect values to template. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 18:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New editor/anon is adding unsourced information (uniforms) to the article and incorrect values to template. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Semi-protection is not going to stop the registered editor. — MusikAnimal talk 18:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New editor/anon is adding unsourced information (uniforms) to the article and incorrect values to template. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — MusikAnimal talk 18:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppet (now blocked) page creation, repeatedly having CSD tag removed/challenged for no good reason. Gaff (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., do not see a need for indefinite semi-protection right now. Added to my watchlist, will react if necessary.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: or Indefinite semi-protection: Numerous vandalism since one year block last month was lifted. Request another one year block or indefinite. Msw1002 (talk) 19:45, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. — MusikAnimal talk 22:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dawnseeker2000 18:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unreasonable editing from his livestream fans, persistent adding of unverifiable info/vandalism. Mr. Mario (talk) 17:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:32, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated reversion of sourced information by single-purpose account. Down Kitty (talk) 16:01, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

24 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IP adding unsourced/poorly sourced info. NeilN talk to me 18:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move-protection: slow speed move war over the past few months between Kenosha and Kenosha, Wisconsin. I don't care which one is used, but it needs to stop moving for a few months. Dual Freq (talk) 17:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indef. AlexiusHoratius 18:46, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Hum1969. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Appears to have only gone at it again yesterday. Hopefully the SPI will sort it out. If traffic picks up, please do ask again. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: The player is set to join PAOK in Greece but yet officialy announced. As usual unsourced information about this matter is inserted in this article. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 07:04, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - if it's not sorted out by then, then it'll be a good idea to re-protect. Hopefully there will be sources by that time one way or another. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:03, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy disruption of IPs following rush-release of highly regarded album by a highly-regarded recording artist. livelikemusic my talk page! 21:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There are a few IP and new editors who are either adding good content or who obviously aren't sure what they're doing. If it picks up again after the two weeks there's nothing wrong with protecting it again - this just might give it a while to cool down. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:36, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-standing vandalism concerning judging panel from IP addresses over the past select weeks. livelikemusic my talk page! 17:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - there seems to be vandalism going back a lot further than the last few weeks. This is probably best to handle traffic as we're heading towards the next season. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:29, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. livelikemusic my talk page! 21:55, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only (talk) 03:12, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SLBedit (talk) 21:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: This person recently died. The protecting administrator is on vacation. Perhaps a downgrade is needed. George Ho (talk) 07:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the recent news coverage in the UK I think now would be the wrong time to reduce protection. ϢereSpielChequers 09:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor. --George Ho (talk) 09:51, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

25 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Range of constantly changing IP's adding extremely dubious content. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 20:41, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A vandal is evidently using several sockpuppets to vandalize this article today. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 19:45, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 20:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bentogoa (talk) 18:41, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done, sort of. I've deleted the article as a hoax. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:58, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and identical vandalism by multiple IP addresses. Scjessey (talk) 16:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Elockid for 5 days. tutterMouse (talk) 17:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – JaraxleArtemis target. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:15, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For future reference, you guys can message me on my talk page also. Elockid (Talk) 13:48, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of vandal with differing IP addresses. 331dot (talk) 12:55, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For future reference, you guys can message me on my talk page also. Elockid (Talk) 13:48, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP6 edit-warring over layout style, and apparent IP personal animosity against Mashaunix. Binksternet (talk) 04:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

what are you talking about. Personal "animosity" . PROVE there was "personal" animosity. PROVE I "vandalized" you also accused me of switching my IP. PROVE IT. those are pretty big ASSUMPTIONS. Also not assuming Good Faith. Are you drunk? Make this guy PROVE a"animosity" why no links to prove "accusations" Bink. 73.193.195.69 (talk) 04:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

see us working through some details to days ago. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mashaunix#its.3F You may be on the computer too many hours today. Try a nap perhaps. 73.193.195.69 (talk) 04:48, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Barek for 1 month. tutterMouse (talk) 17:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:2606:6000:FD07:E900:A1A3:E8AE:9A34:9F13 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – JaraxleArtemis sock IP, being mucked around with by JA's other IPs. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Haminoon (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell.. Yes it has since been protected. Haminoon (talk) 03:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is an issue with people who will want to game me into edit warring and get blocked because they don't like that Wikipedia uses the official translations into English over the fan-created illegal subtitles for this Japanese TV series. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 20:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Months appear to go by with only sporadic instances of dispute. If an editor gets disruptive, perhaps a block of the disruptive editor would be best. Goading or not. Don't get drawn into an edit war. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 02:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The same IP performed the edit, again, and another IP performed a similar edit on a related page. Panyd can you please reconsider?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 04:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruptive editing by IP editors. See page edit history. Ones removing the same section have yet to discuss anything on talk page. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 00:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. wL<speak·check> 01:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock puppetry. MadGuy7023 (talk) 22:56, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --slakr\ talk / 23:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The game being this weekend, there's a lot of vandalism and copy and pasting from other all star game articles going on. Gloss 05:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And just to add, it looks like very little reverting and vandalism but if you go in and look at the edits, it's a lot of IP's making bad edits and other IP's undoing them by making (often) worse edits, without the usual "Undid revision" edit summary. Very messy situation. Gloss 05:56, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor. Consider this withdrawn, as there has been a lot less activity in the past 12 hours or so. I'll re-request if the issue pops back up again. Gloss 22:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Has drawn the attention of WP:ARARAT once again. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 23:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent unexplained removal of content and addition of unsourced content, as evidenced by this edit, which has been re-added several times this month. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 13:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. I understand it's probably annoying, and this case is a bit borderline as far as 'heavy activity' goes, but it's still only three anon editors in last 10 days. Just revert them if the edits are incorrect. Re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 18:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been the subject of sanitization efforts over the long term. Most have been by various IPs. I just responded to one on the talk page. diff. Long-term / indefinite IP protection is warranted. http://www.salon.com/2007/04/12/castaneda/ is a good source . Elvey(t•c) 22:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - I can see there is a slow burning edit war going on here - but it appears to be a content dispute, especially over the last few days. If the two IPs currently engaged in this disruptive activity continue, I can see a block being more appropriate. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Panyd. The reason I think the behavior is disruptive enough to warrant semi-protection is that the IPs are making claims in bad faith. Yeah, we're dealing with True Believers here. We're dealing with a cult leader, so it's to be expected. Self-published, web-only - totally made up smears, AFAICT. http://pvtimes.com/content/about-us.html says : "The Pahrump Valley Times is a bi-weekly newspaper published by Stephens Media LLC. The print edition of the Pahrump Valley Times is distributed on Wednesday and Friday mornings." ISTM challenges are being made in bad faith. But if the disruptive activity stops, it stops. --Elvey(t•c) 19:24, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

26 January 2015

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – funny. Bossanoven (talk) 19:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Full protection - This page whas been subject to an ongoing edit war since 31 December 2014. User User:InfiLaw seems to think it is standard practice to revert to his edits, them make comments on the talk page. Users User:FyzixFighter, User talk:ChristensenMJ, and myself (with User:Good Olfactory reverting just once also), have been forced to revert his edit over an over again begging him to take it to the talk page and we would discuss his idea. However he needs to wait for a consensus before adding such WP:POV edits. Weather he is right or not is irrelevant, a consensus needs to be reached before adding changes. However he refused to wait and only argues on the Talk page. --- ARTEST4ECHO (talk) 13:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection - multiple sleepers have awoken to try to insert South Park Cartoons into the article. WilyD 12:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - hopefully they'll get bored by then. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Changed to 1 week) PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Hoax. Dai Pritchard (talk) 12:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by Kudpung. tutterMouse (talk) 12:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent serious BLP violations. Disturbingly they have already made it into the google info box.. Haminoon (talk) 00:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 05:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Editors adding teams premature to next rounds and adding teams wrong while not reading the tiebreakers. Kante4 (talk) 17:51, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editors also adding and removing teams from the final rankings and vandalizing has been started a bit more also. Kante4 (talk) 20:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:49, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 07:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing. IPs and new accounts adding unsourced content since long time. Babita arora 05:47, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It is constantly a target for vandalism and promotion by new and unregistered users. The one that forgot (talk) 00:48, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing since last semi-protection expired. Frequent target due to circumstances surrounding the subject—including recent events. Prefall 05:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:31, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new accounts adding unsourced infromation. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 04:23, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started up when the last semi expired. NeilN talk to me 04:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 05:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new accounts keep changing facts without any sources. . Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 03:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent block evader keeps adding Weekly Shonen Jump as a terrorist organization with no source to back it up.Crboyer (talk) 01:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content by IPs. — Status (talk · contribs) 19:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: continued vandalism after previous protection expired, as evidenced by these edits:

No one seems to be paying any close attention to what's going on with this page anymore. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 19:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 20:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@AlexiusHoratius, the page has been a frequent target for vandalismover the past few years, owing to lack of attention from administrators. Something needs to be done one way or another. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 20:10, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You have to just revert them in this case. Check in on it every couple of days. Roll it back if it's garbage, go back to an old version if you have to. But in this case, at least recently on this article, in my opinion the vandalism is not frequent enough for semiprotection (the slow pace of the vandalism would necessitate a long period to be worthwhile.) I know it gets annoying at times; I get annoyed too by it. Sometimes I tell myself that it's the price of having open editing - the reward is an encyclopedia that dwarfs its rivals - but the price is vandalism. AlexiusHoratius 20:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of incorrect content by IPs. — Evertonfc13 (talk) 19:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - only one anon in last week or so. Pursue WP:AIV if vandalism otherwise WP:DR. AlexiusHoratius 20:02, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Possible content dispute. George Ho (talk) 10:02, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - request was good at the time but article has been quiet for a couple days. Re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 23:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs, some possibly sockpuppeting. Deunanknute (talk) 18:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sam Walton (talk) 22:45, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extend pending changes: Protecting administrator not responding to my request. There is still vandalism. Protection expiring soon. --George Ho (talk) 05:24, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for three years by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 22:59, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – 700+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indef. AlexiusHoratius 23:04, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. unregistered users and recently registered users highly vandalised this article regarding the (BLP) person Age and marital status. these information adding to the article without any reference. and some other information removed from the article. would like to request semi-pretection.Landy3 (talk) 08:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 23:12, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

27 January 2015

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated Wgolf (talk) 20:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by SuperMarioMan. tutterMouse (talk) 20:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal adding joke sentence to the page. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 20:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bjelleklang - talk 20:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bentogoa (talk) 18:55, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 13:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for 2 weeks by Ronhjones. tutterMouse (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple unconfirmed accounts. VVikingTalkEdits 12:55, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism in the last 8 hours from at least 5 IPs and 2 new named accounts. Stickee (talk) 10:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of unsourced additions, and bad edits by IPs mostly in the past week and a bit further back. Gloss 04:14, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: A controversial BLP of an active politician. Swarm of new editors tries to erase well-sourced but inconvenient information, disrupting the article. No such user (talk) 08:06, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I also warned the user about edit warring. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs seem to love mucking around with this page. Even a year's semi protection didn't stop them from starting right up again... so it's time to shut it down for good. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 06:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent, regular IP vandalism. waste of editor energy on low-traffic article to be dealing with it all the time. . Montanabw(talk) 05:12, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – for the last couple of weeks. SMP0328. (talk) 02:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs keep adding names to the list that do not meet WP:LISTPEOPLE or WP:BLPNOTE. I keep warning them and they do not listen. Also, there is a reason as to why they cannot be listed in the article via the talk page. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 23:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Media reports of a YPG "victory" in just the city are causing IPs to change article to say the Siege is over, but there are 350 villages in the area under ISIL control and ongoing fighting. Pending Changes will allow some oversight on inappropriate too soon changes while still letting everyone edit. See talk for more details. . Legacypac (talk) 20:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The edit rate is too high for pending changes. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Much unsourced. QED237 (talk) 20:02, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:14, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of unsourced edits. QED237 (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:12, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Long term problem with this pseudohistorian and his advocates. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note, this is a target of ProfessorJane (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 01:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Vsmith for a month. tutterMouse (talk) 07:14, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extend pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Protecting administrator inactive for now. --George Ho (talk) 04:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note I don't know. This is a major topic that has and will undoubtedly continue to attract disruption. Occasional bursts of high edit rates worries me continuing with pending changes will clutter the PC backlog. There are few constructive edits from unconfirmed users, much appear to be very minor grammatical changes. This makes me inclined to just semi-protect... but I'll leave my analysis for another admin to take into consideration with their decision. At the end of the day, having too many articles under pending changes is the same as having one with a high edit rate. Sometimes for major topics semi is just better. — MusikAnimal talk 22:36, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for indefinite. The turning point for me was that 50 edits go back to last November. That's slow enough to make PC effective. If it gets hit faster, please come back and ask for semi. For now I think PC is working here. Courcelles 08:19, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Please unsalt so a redirect can be created. Thanks. JMHamo (talk) 00:54, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@JMHamo: Have you asked the protecting admin? Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, I have not. Should I do that instead? JMHamo (talk) 00:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JMHamo: Yes. You should do that whenever the protecting admin is still active (and still an admin). Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:01, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done.. Thanks JMHamo (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 07:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is getting hit by a persistent vandal who keeps adding sexual themed vandalism, and then changes IPs when banned. Protect for a day or until the vandal loses interest. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Current target of sockpuppeteer David Beals. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:47, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Pending changes isn't working. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bossanoven (talk) 02:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bossanoven (talk) 19:18, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Wave of disruption appears to have passed — MusikAnimal talk 23:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppet vandal target. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 23:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppet vandal target. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — MusikAnimal talk 22:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bossanoven (talk) 20:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 22:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Full protection:An ip is ressurecting the editwar on this page.--Mr Fink (talk) 18:36, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In that case User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 22:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: receiving some vandalism, highly visible page. Could you please mind the page's log? Bossanoven (talk) 18:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. There's been a bit of vandalism but I'm sure the page has plenty of watchers. AlexiusHoratius 22:46, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 20:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Issue resolved. Albeit a very undesirable source, having to search for flights date by date, but it checks out. — MusikAnimal talk 22:24, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Both accounts are past 3RR, but maybe locking is preferable to blocking this time? Will warn both as well. VQuakr (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Stale, but would not have protected anyway as this is a clear case of edit warring between two users (and one who was logged out). @VQuakr: in cases like this I think WP:ANEW is more appropriate, just for the record. Sorry us admins were so late responding to both reports... — MusikAnimal talk 22:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is going to become a target because of what people across the internet perceive as my impending ban from the project. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 04:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. — MusikAnimal talk 21:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP editor (possibly the same as user Keepitreal2 (talk) consistently makes changes, causing a mini edit-war; he/she refuses to come to the talk page to discuss his/her changes, and accuses other editors of simply embracing an "inconvenient truth" and orders us to "give up, already." Ecjmartin (talk) 19:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I wholeheartedly support Ecjmartin request. Except perhaps the "Indefinite" part. However, as this is a slow edit war (edits come every few weeks), It definitely needs to be long term (perhaps a year).
I do not know if the IP editor is Keepitreal2 or not, but the IP editor absolutely refuses to come to talk page. We (Ecjmartin, Tripleahg, and myself) have asked IP editor to discuss his edits repeatedly. We even started a discussion here that editor refuses to participate in. As this editor us using some method to change IP address at every edit, the only recourse it to semi-protection page, so that editor will have to log in. Then if behavior continues he can be reported to WP:ANI.--- ARTEST4ECHO(Talk) 20:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Changing request from "Indefinite" to "Temporary." Concur with Artist's idea of placing one year's protection on the page; then we can go from there. Have no problem with that idea, at all. - Ecjmartin (talk) 20:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
After looking at the User contributions: Keepitreal2, I tend to agree with Ecjmartin. The edit summeirs suggest it is the same person (see here and here) --- ARTEST4ECHO(Talk) 20:32, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see where we stand after this expires. — MusikAnimal talk 23:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SLBedit (talk) 00:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Same as talk page request, disruption seems to have passed. Sorry for getting to these requests so late — MusikAnimal talk 21:47, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of unrelegated association football clubs (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SLBedit (talk) 21:01, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Disruption seems to have passed, and in my opinion more would have been required to warrant semi-protection of a mainpsace talk page — MusikAnimal talk 21:47, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Defection/Suspension of a politician from one party to another risking edit wars and vandalism [3][4]Williambatesuk (talk) 21:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Edit warring doesn't seem that rampant, looks like normal wiki activity to me — MusikAnimal talk 21:45, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This was apparently put on indefinite semi-protection in 2010 because of a trade. There is no reason why this should still be protected. Bossanoven (talk) 23:31, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bossanoven: Did you ask the protecting admin already? Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:32, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Jackmcbarn: No, because the protecting admin hasn't made an edit in like 6 or 7 months. - Bossanoven (talk) 23:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:36, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 15:23, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by new accounts, all trying to redirect any URL links on the page to 'clickonez.com'. PublicolaMinor (talk) 12:31, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A message board has been encouraging vandalism of this article, mainly the changing of Mysterio's birth name. Other erroneous, likely unrelated, unsourced changes have taken place recently as well.LM2000 (talk) 09:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. — MusikAnimal talk 22:48, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Change Protection Persistent spaming by tsu users with releral links. - Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 20:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Larry Pickering (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – And please revdel last edit. NeilN talk to me 07:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. — MusikAnimal talk 22:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and persistent vandalism consistent with vandalism found on WrestleMania 31, Roman Reigns, and Royal Rumble (2014). retched (talk) 05:57, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Repeated infobox edit warring by several users over singles. A talk page discussion didn't seem to solve anything. IPadPerson (talk) 00:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Unsourced content is from unconfirmed users, and we never indefinitely fully protect, and rarely indefinitely semi-protect. — MusikAnimal talk 22:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism and persistent changes with no explanation. Not abiding by neutral point of view and deletions of important references. Stuke2 (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Full protection is likely in order, but semi is a start. I'm watching the article. — MusikAnimal talk 22:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Three articles

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and block evasion. The protection on Huang (state) only expired a few days ago. -Zanhe (talk) 04:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This current IP editor has nothing to do with the previous editors, Zanhe (talk) is using this excuse of "IP vandalism" and "block evasion" in an effort to further his agenda of pushing his pov onto these pages, please take a look at the Huang page where all Zanhe (talk) did was completely delete information to the point where the article is rendered useless. Zanhe (talk) is the vandal who is trying to use administrators to push his pov. Please investigate Zanhe (talk), Thank you! 64.134.234.101 (talk) 04:48, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See admin action and comment [44] [45] two weeks ago. I guess the last block was not long enough. -Zanhe (talk) 05:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Was recently TKOed in the 1st round of a fight. Aerospeed (Talk) 03:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 21:49, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

28 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: High level of new user vandalism all of a sudden. It's not a featured article today, is it? ‖ Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 20:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing addition of problematic text (unreferenced opinion) by a series of IPs, always the same text simply restored after an established editor removes it. None of the IPs involved has responded to requests for discussion. The page has been semi-protected twice, once on December 8 for two weeks, and then on December 24 for a month. Each time, the edit warring has resumed as soon as the protection term ended. --Ken Gallager (talk) 17:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 6 months. EdJohnston (talk) 18:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Slow edit warring from different IPs, with edit summaries of "as before..." suggesting it's all the same person. McGeddon (talk) 15:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-I support the added protection to this page, but recommend full protection for an indefinite period since the edit warring is not only ips and new accounts it is also established editors which are invovled. Recommend consensus be reached on the talk page prior to protection being lifted.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:38, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try semi first. No sense in shutting all non-admin users if we're able to achieve stability by shutting out just some users. This is a content dispute, however, and the talk page hasn't been touched in a year. I suggest it be put to use. — MusikAnimal talk 18:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an unknown IP. Please semi-protect for a month. ~ P-123 (talk) 11:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David Biddulph: The IP edits were on a subsection of the userpage, i.e. P123ct/Notes. I requested semi-protection of the whole of the userpage, since the IP if blocked from the subsection will almost certainly go to the rest of the userpage. I removed the edits by the IP which can be seen from the Revision History (see . and ..) Please advise what I should do now. ~ P-123 (talk) 12:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is a difference between a subpage and a section of a page. I believe that if you want a subpage protecting you need to request that specifically, but the regulars here will hopefully tell you. Note also that you need to be precise when you refer to a page. There is no page P123ct/Notes, nor even User:P123ct/Notes; you probably meant to say User:P-123/Notes, but when making requests you need to be clear. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
David Biddulph: This is my userpage. Under that, there is a "part" called "P123ct/Notes". The vandalism was to "P123ct/Notes" (see links to the IP's edits in this "part" above). I thought I needed to request semi-protection for the whole of my userpage, i.e. "User:P-123". Where am I going wrong? ~ P-123 (talk) 12:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your user page has never had any IP edits, as you can see from its history. On that page you have a text string "P123ct/Notes" which you have set up to link to User:P123ct1/Notes, which is merely a redirect. That redirect too has not had any IP edits. The redirect is to User:P-123/Notes, and that is the page about which I believe you are concerned. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
David Biddulph: Yes, that is the page I am concerned about. An admin advised me to request semi-protection from him directly, or come to this board. As my request here is proving complicated, and as I want the whole of my userpage semi-protected, I think it is best if I abandon this and deal directly with the admin. Thanks for your help in untangling this! ~ P-123 (talk) 13:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, for the bot GedUK  13:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP disruption. Please semi-prot it uptill its release date. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 11:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing (dating back to December) from one IP user using multiple IP addresses. JayJ47 (talk) 06:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Tito Dutta (talk) 09:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blanking by IP jumper. . -- Sam Sing! 10:42, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. GedUK  12:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Anons seem to be added unreliable sources and dubious information, an expert needs to attend to this article and until then it should be protected either semi- or pc-protection. Luxure Σ 05:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired hours ago; before that, there has been still vandalism. I notified the previous protecting administrator about this; I've not seen a reply. It may seem too soon, but the protection was at least not semi-protection. George Ho (talk) 04:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Several anon users and registered users engaged in war editing. TySoltaur (talk) 03:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 205.215.222.185 (talk · contribs) blocked by JohnCD. Mr.Z-man 03:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: More than 500 transclusions; probably 600 or 700. George Ho (talk) 02:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined a few hundred transclusions does not make a template high risk. We'd have to be talking in the thousands before I'll even consider pre-emptively semi'ing a template. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: I'm done. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 03:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done per WP:UPROT -- Euryalus (talk) 04:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Persistent IP edit warring and sock/meat puppetry.--Cúchullain t/c 03:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: constant undiscussed genre warring as well as whether or not to include the retirement year (2015). Have not officially retired yet. Qxukhgiels (talk) 22:33, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined pending changes is good for vandalism and BLP violations because it keeps that stuff out of the 'live' version. It does not, though, prevent the edits from being made, so it wouldn't be much use in this case. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Keepitreal2 has repeatedly refused to discuss the edit made by her, instead demanding that all the editor "Let me be clear, give up already". Four editors User:Ecjmartin (multiple times), and User:Tripleahg (one time), and user:AsteriskStarSplat (one time), and Myself (Twice), have revered to the original wording, but Keepitreal2 refuses to use the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. The discussion was open here, but Keepitreal2 refuses to talk. Even after being reported to the Administrators' noticeboard, Keepitreal2 still refuses to talk and changed the page back twice (here and here)
Please note that the page is already semi-protection as Keepitreal2 was using an IP address to edit. Now that she is using a name, she still refuses to talk. --- ARTEST4ECHO(Talk) 22:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Warned user about edit warring. No sense in shutting out all non-admin users when there's one user causing disruption. — MusikAnimal talk 23:06, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. There doesn't seem to be much of an edit war going on right now. Also, it only appears to be between two users. So blocks would be more appropriate if it continues. Elockid (Talk) 23:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: ongoing unsourced additions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Infrequent, and page watchers such as yourself are doing an excellent job keeping the article in shape. — MusikAnimal talk 22:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: pages have been moved in a ridiculous fashion by sockpuppet of a blocked/banned user. Requesting move protection to prevent any further incidents like this one. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 02:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – same vandalism continued the instant the protection expired. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The only edits made after the protection appear to be made in good faith and don't seem like vandalism to me. Elockid (Talk) 22:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Too many bad edits in this page, the last edit to Bobs burgers was yesterday, Too many IPs putting bad edits and vandalism. Iamthemostwanted2015 (talk) 14:18, 27 January 2015 (UTC)Iamthemostwanted2015[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A few unconstructive edits here and there, but not much beyond normal wiki activity. — MusikAnimal talk 22:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced (and likely false) film titles by various IPs. SummerPhD (talk) 01:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP keeps getting vandalized by multiple IP users to reflect improper length of sentence. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 23:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Media rumors are afloat re desertion charges & IPs are EWing about calling him a deserter. – S. Rich (talk) 22:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gamaliel. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Third request in 3 months. Dutch IP with agenda reverting all improvement to his own preferred version. Also other users adding undue level of details in individual case cencercing czech family. Orland (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bjelleklang - talk 21:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Amortias (T)(C) 18:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I just blocked three involved users for EW on this article, will await page protection to see how they behave once the blocks wear off. See the WP:AN3 case for more information. Bjelleklang - talk 21:12, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced speculation being added to this BLP, that is not true and needs reverting. Please protect for a while. Thanks. JMHamo (talk) 18:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Immediately off last protect resumption of attempts by ipsocks of Gabucho181 (talk · contribs) to add fake information about Dan Vs. and network changes . Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elockid (Talk) 22:42, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An edit-war has broken out. Limited talkpage discussion so far; if we could pry our fingers off the revert button, more might be achieved on the talkpage. bobrayner (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elockid (Talk) 22:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated introduction of unsourced series end date by IPs. There is a clear note in |last_aired= asking editors to contribute a source with an end date, but this has been flagrantly ignored by this IP, this IP, and this IP. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 23:01, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

29 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sam Walton (talk) 20:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been target of continuous vandalism by IPs. 81.129.157.168 (talk) 18:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:23, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article just went off full protection due to an intense and hotly debated issue only to promptly be subjected to nonsense IP vandalism. All appropriate contributors active in editing the article and participating in the discussion have user accounts, so it won't affect any of them. Montanabw(talk) 22:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined only one edit, but come back if it picks up. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:49, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by non-IP accounts. AldezD (talk) 17:29, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:21, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – link spamming . Avono (talk) 17:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. tr (talk) 16:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: 7k tranc's and intricate workings with {{Chembox}}, {{Infobox drug}} and User:CheMoBot. -DePiep (talk) 15:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:09, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Article deleted in WP:AFD. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent tempering of the contents noticed from various i.p. users causing hindrance in developing the good shape article. The page protection is needed till the article is complete. . Mahensingha Talk 14:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by Denniss. SideshowBob7 (talk) 14:23, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Iamthemostwanted2015 (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Iamthemostwanted2015[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours. QED237 (talk) 12:49, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 12:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant edit warring by an autoconfirmed account and IP editor to promote an actor in the film. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Regular vandalism, adding references to sex and other inappropriate content. For some reason this topic seems to attract more vandals than other topics. EvM-Susana (talk) 12:26, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Primefac (talk) 12:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MadGuy7023 (talk) 11:09, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary? Semi-protection: Persistent spamming of an external link by various IPs. WilyD 10:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also URL blacklisted and proxies blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Hi, Requesting page protection for this page as the Delhi elections are closing in and it ends up having more irrelevant ingredients added to the page. If the page could be restricted to autoconfirmed editors it would be great help.  A m i t  웃   14:39, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Bentogoa (talk) 13:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Tito Dutta (talk) 14:03, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – During PC protection. George Ho (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PC protection expires in a few days, what good would semi-protection until then do? I do agree though that PC isn't doing enough to lower the amount of reverted good faith edits going on. tutterMouse (talk) 10:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'll ask the administrator to extend protection time. --George Ho (talk) 16:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection vandalism; some obvious temptations here.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - though slightly longer than last time if possible. This page has a history of fans of My Little Pony adding Bronies to the "see also" section. Page protection has been the only way to get them to stop. MarnetteD|Talk 06:23, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Semi-protected for a period of two years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 00:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been target of continuous vandalism by IPs. 81.129.157.168 (talk) 00:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:39, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: The page is vandalized almost daily, and was vandalized 3 times today by IPs. Kaciemonster (talk) 23:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - constant IP vandalism (though mostly from a single range-hopping vandal). St★lwart111 05:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by EdJohnston for 30 days. tutterMouse (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spite vandalism. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. (semi until 1 March). If you'd like it extended before then please ask the protecting admin. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:27, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Repeated unnecessary/unexplained removal of infobox picture. IPadPerson (talk) 23:31, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (page semi'd for a week and user blocked - that should do it). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:30, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Temporary but rather long term. Accounts ignoring AfD outcome to just redirect . The Banner talk 22:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is going to be an edit war any time soon... The Banner talk 00:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:23, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – appears to be the victim of a mass attack by newly created accounts. Bossanoven (talk) 20:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:25, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the 8th of October, 8 different users (2 IPs and 6 new users) have been adding POV content to the article under the same edit summary of "Fixed typo". I plan to open an SPI on this if it gets serious. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 20:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. (pending changes protected for 2 months). If'd like it increased please ask the protecting admin. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:21, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

High vandalism

Indefinite semi-protection or temporary fully-protection: Persistent vandalism from mostly anon users, but also from some registered ones. I and some bots made countless reversions in the past days. The vandals keep adding "nicknames" to them based on their Twitter posts (which, of course, we cannot take them seriously). Cheers, MYS77 ✉ 20:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There isn't enough of a history to justify long term semi protection yet, it looks like this has been going on for about a month so I've protected them for that long. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:07, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – I asked previous protecting administrator for extension. He/she did not respond, leaving the protection to expire. There was an attempted addition of unsourced claims today, so I reverted the info. George Ho (talk) 20:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:09, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Daily vandalism. Subject is a high profile target for vandalism. Someone keeps vandalizing this article on Danny Blum, a footballer, who changed his religion, he keeps adding statements like "he betrayed his country and people", someone help me please.. Albatalad (talk) Albatalad (talk) 19:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JIP. (semi for one week). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:IDriveAStickShift (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bentogoa (talk) 08:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 08:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from dynamic IPs. IP vandal returns only a few days after the last protection expired. The IP has been identified by another user as a sock of the blocked sockmaster ProfessorJane (see [46]). -Zanhe (talk) 05:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user Zanhe (talk) is a repeat offender and guilty of multiple deletions of entire pages of sourced material as well as vandalizing pages (see [47]). Zanhe (talk) is also a blocked user that is continually vandalizing pages while trying to use administrators to his advantage so that he can push his pov-ridden edits. Zanhe (talk) is not abiding by Wikipedia's official policy on maintaining a Neutral Point of View for all articles. 71.93.116.103 (talk) 07:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See past admin action [48], [49], as well as persistent sockpuppetry by the same user on Huang (state), which was recently protected. -Zanhe (talk) 08:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Zanhe (talk) is very hypocritical, he is the one deleting entire pages of sourced material and then repeatedly asking administrators to block other editors in his favor just so that he can continue to delete and push his pov on other pages. Please see indisputable evidence of Zanhe (talk)'s past deletions and vandalism of the page (see [50]). Zanhe (talk) is also wrongly and falsely accusing any editor who goes against his non-neutral pov as a so-called sockpuppet. This is an erroneous accusation with no grounding whatsoever. Thanks!69.80.103.16 (talk) 08:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@HkCaGu and Zanhe: Could one of you submit a sockpuppet investigation please. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:27, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Callanecc: I'm not sure if a new SPI would be worth the effort. 74.3.6.26 was already investigated in August 2014 and blocked once. But this user's IPs change so fast (probably using some kind of VPN and/or mobile service) that blocking them is useless. Please take a look at the history of Lord Chunshen, Huang (state), Culture of Korea, and Culture of South Korea to see how many different IPs have repeatedly made the same edits. ProfessorJane's SPI page already lists dozens of IPs. -Zanhe (talk) 08:53, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If they're using a new range it is worth reporting it as admins will look there to see whether the 'new' IP is within the same range (a hence likely the same) or a different range (quite possibly not the same). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Semi protection was very recently lifted and IP and new editor vandalism and general poor edits has picked back up. Gloss 23:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I was the admin who semi-protected it for a week last time. Let me tell you that I was watching this page's activity and I was thinking to semi-protect it once again. Now, I have Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Note, if you need extended protection even after that, probably I'll skip this request and allow some other admin to judge it. Regards. --Tito Dutta (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple edits by same IP removing sourced content. -- Moxy (talk) 22:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple edits by IPs adding unsourced content, BLP violations. Denniss (talk) 22:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:59, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request for own user page. Bananasoldier (talk) 22:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. AlexiusHoratius 22:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible page. Bossanoven (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Already on pc. Reviewers are edit warring non location of the sister city that put it on pc in the first place . John from Idegon (talk) 20:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dawnseeker2000 20:24, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mr.Z-man 22:38, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sockpuppet IP editor

Temporary semi-protection: Articles with probably sockpuppetry IP edtior disruption. [Possible sockpuppet reported], but I would request that the articles be lock as to cease the back and forth. Spshu (talk) 21:42, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • As a) you have already initiated reporting process and b) I can see on the SPI archive page that this has been a problematic issue, I have Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. both articles. Hopefully, our SPI team will finish their investigation by then. Any other admins, feel free to change or undo my action. --Tito Dutta (talk) 22:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Daily vandalism. Subject is a high profile target for vandalism. Some Minecraft YouTuber for whom the chilluns seem to have a love-hate relationship with. Requesting at least a few days protection from IPs and non-autoconfirmeds. Danke. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page creation protection-Keeps on getting recreated. I believe this is the 3rd time in less then a month. Wgolf (talk) 18:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected — MusikAnimal talk 22:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Frequent deliberate errors and vandalism.LM2000 (talk) 17:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 22:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

30 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing by IP who has made their intention clear. Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 14:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — east718 | talk | 16:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by a group of new single-purpose accounts, with such evocative names as "I am sock puppet of Yanguas", evidently a carryover of some dispute from the ptwiki. It would be good ifthe accounts were blocked too. Constantine ✍ 14:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. / User(s) blocked. by Salvidrim. — east718 | talk | 16:44, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

M. S. Dhoni: The Untold Story (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite full-protection Persistent vandalism/dispute, IP's and confirmed users continually making unconstructive edits. Babita arora 10:51, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:30, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Salt. Gaff (talk) 18:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Also blocked the ID editor; one week should be sufficient to deter more recreations. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Long history of vandalism. AmaryllisGardener talk 18:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Tito Dutta (talk) 18:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing by IP and new single-purpose account. They refuse to discuss and leave misleading edit summaries. It'd be best if they were also blocked. --Local hero talk 16:47, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and user warned as they had only made two edits. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:07, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs/new users jumping the gun with unconfirmed speculation linking the subject to a transfer. '''tAD''' (talk) 17:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:03, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs and socks edit-warring, adding unsourced position information. Chronic K-pop problem. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 16:33, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. QED237 (talk) 14:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:58, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of rumored transfer, IP editors getting ahead of themselves. Mosmof (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:41, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP's continually making unconstructive edits. ZoidXsa (talk) 11:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Same as Ross William Ulbricht. Article repeatedly restored with BLP problems. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: Edit warring. The Destroyer Of Nyr (talk) 21:32, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The other user topic banned. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 09:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Callanecc. — east718 | talk | 16:49, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated insertion of irrelevant negative story about subject's father. . Binksternet (talk) 04:37, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — east718 | talk | 16:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor continually making unconstructive edits, attempting to remove a (perfectly valid) image from the page. Primefac (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:16, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two Sport Trade Articles

Temporary full protection: Massive edit war and possible ownership issues Weegeerunner (talk) 21:30, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection Some annoying shifting IP page blanking at the moment, and one new account. Origamiteⓣⓒ 00:39, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Tito Dutta (talk) 04:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This review-based article has come under heavy attack from anonymous editors just these past hours and it appears persistent (first non-constructive edit[51]). !BSGT! (talk) 20:30, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Been indefinitely protected since 2010 without much justification for such a duration. Protecting admin does not seem to be particularly active. I left a message on his page several days ago with no response. Bossanoven (talk) 02:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Current target of IPsocks of Gabucho181 (talk · contribs). Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:47, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:55, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Clear WP:BLPCRIME issue. Person charged with being the Dread Pirate Roberts (Silk Road). A serious BLP problem as he has not been found guilty and is not otherwise notable. Has had to be turned into a redirect multiple times now. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:31, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of bad edits from IP's lately. Gloss 16:23, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@HJ Mitchell: What dispute to you see? There's just a ton of bad edits by at least 10 different IP's or new accounts... Gloss 21:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism from breaking news (most recent non-constructive edit[52]). Mbarbier (talk) 20:41, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Courcelles., 3 months--Ymblanter (talk) 22:41, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – An IP-hopping anon editor keeps changing the description of the neighborhood's police force without taking part in discussions. Co-op City Department of Public Safety and Sea Gate Police Department protected for same reason. Mosmof (talk) 19:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined once a year for three years is not a big deal, and one was PROD, which is explicitly a soft deletion process. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Long term semi ended today, IP vandalism resumes. Subject is a BLP and has been protected countless times before, this really couldn't come at a worse time to unprotect due to a current controversy he is involved in '''tAD''' (talk) 22:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: slow moving edit war with an IP (prior blocked) adding completely irrelevant pictures. The Banner talk 22:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing unsourced changes. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

31 January 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Although the vandalism comes in fits and spurts, almost every IP edit to this article ever has been unconstructive at best, and pure vandalism at worst. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:54, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Needs discussion, so please protect until consensus is determined . JMHamo (talk) 20:28, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and I have no idea why '''tAD''' (talk) 18:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Templates Fdacite and Chemspidercite

From Full protection to Template protection: Old PP is a bit strong, for under 12k transc's. I (with TE rights) have prepared many {{Chembox}} related changes in sandboxes, would like to put them live in one controlled go. (Please do not rm the prot template; is also prepared in sandbox). -DePiep (talk) 14:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and block evasion by User:AfricaTanz. The blockee is causing disruption by removing information that is cited and is not willing to discuss. It also posts unrelated edit sumamries. This clearly show the user is here to cause disruption as its past SPI corroborates my assertion. Ali Fazal (talk) 15:33, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Previous IP editing pattern continues. . -- Sam Sing! 11:41, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: unsourced/poorly sourced sales changes and vandalism. Previous semi-protection was 6 months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chamith (talk) 02:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant transfer speculation about a player who has almost left, but hasn't officially left yet. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:58, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – request page protection from non auto-confirmed users due to persistent vandalism for 10+ days from multiple IPs/Users. Deunanknute (talk) 20:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Diannaa. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:41, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continued edit-warring between IPs, repeated additions of non-neutral and unreferenced content by one obviously WP:COI editor. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Nograviti (talk) 19:35, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Editor has rushed here to seek semi- protection without allowing discussion on Talk Page which is ongoing to resolve problem. In any case editors involded are all well established editors with accounts so this request would achieve nothing.Tmol42 (talk) 20:44, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now - Article looks like it has calmed down a bit over past 24 hours. AlexiusHoratius 15:26, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: until February 3rd. The new president will enter in office only on Tuesday, with his oath. The corresponding article on wiki:it has been already full protected.

Declined - not enough activity to justify fully protecting a major article. AlexiusHoratius 15:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated recreation following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASAP Yams decision for deletion. Requesting revert to redirect and PP. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 02:07, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:17, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 20:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - I'm going to decline this for now - although it looks like the level of activity makes it diffucult for the editors to check and review other edits in the manner possible on most other articles, it doesn't look like many of the edits are actually being undone or reverted. Re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 15:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'Semi-protection: Loads of IP vandalism, probably by troublemaking kids, see here, here, and here for evidence. This page is prone to vandalism, and I feel it needs to be protected. 118.209.2.5 (talk) 08:33, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 15:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amortias (T)(C) 13:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Mr. Nitin sahu (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Requesting revocation of talk page access after more spam has been placed there. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Materialscientist (talk) 12:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 08:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 15:28, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: The moment that this article came off temporary page protection, the same IP began its POV attacks on the article again. --Taivo (talk) 08:43, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 12:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Mr. Oum was hospitalized early this week per announcement from RoosterTeeth Productions for which Mr. Oum is an employee. From the information that has been released he is in critical condition with a low chance of recovery. I Think it would be wise to place the article under temporary pending changes protection. Dcheagle • talk • contribs 03:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:41, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The page is now beginning to be hit with unsourced additions its no longer preemptive protection.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 06:19, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediately after coming off a 3-day SP, Vandalism has resumed. SMP0328. (talk) 01:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE - Two more acts of Vandalism since I made this request. SMP0328. (talk) 06:23, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recurring target of Bertrand101, a banned user known for hoaxes and unencyclopedic contributions. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:48, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:Salt. See Populah da man. . Gaff (talk) 03:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Salt. Block user as well, for recent recreation of same promo page under User:POPULAHDAMAN . Gaff (talk) 01:43, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Post-postmodernism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of nonsense by unregistered editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:31, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - just one editor lately. AlexiusHoratius 00:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the last two years, see history. Janesaint (talk) 00:18, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 00:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent unsourced claims in a BLP by two IP addresses. IP user is not making an effort to dialog, provide sources or alter the claims. Request a very short (days, not weeks) page protection to allow for a break in the user IP edits. Stesmo (talk) 21:47, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 04:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Current target of Gabucho181 (talk · contribs) - deliberate falsification of info in multiple articles - roving IP . Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:29, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:ArbitrationGate controversy (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – can talk pages be protected?. Avono (talk) 20:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They can but this has only been created three times. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 01:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC).
Creation protected indefinitely. "Only" 3 times? Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Page sees a stream of persistent vandalism either by IPs, or by vandalism accounts.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:35, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Constant vandalism StandNThrow (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:36, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from IPs and non-autoconfirmed new editors the last few days. Increasing today, and likely to continue to increase the next couple of days going into the Super Bowl this Sunday. Protection probably only needs to last to about 24-48 hours after the game ends. Egsan Bacon (talk) 22:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extend pending changes: I asked protecting administrator to extend protection time, but he formally refused. There has been still reverts, particularly due to vandalism. --George Ho (talk) 18:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I'm not seeing an overly large volume of vandalism since the semi expired. — east718 | talk | 18:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FallandSpringOlympics. - MrX 12:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:56, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ https://il.linkedin.com/in/pamelabecker
  2. ^ http://www.jeremyscircle.org/en/about-jeremys-circle
  3. ^ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30967633
  4. ^ amjad_bashir_mep_suspended_from_uk_independence_party_following_investigation
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Archive/2015/01&oldid=1140194857"