Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ameerah1/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Ameerah1

Ameerah1 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

02 February 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

These are clearly the same user(s) or meat puppets, similar edit summaries with overly detailed descriptions, bungling page moves and the overlap here CUPIDICAE💕 23:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and this too CUPIDICAE💕 23:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • @Oshwah: Given the country, i'm inclined to say only  Possible except JFFF234/Xenen1970. I do think this is some form of meatpuppet recruitment as they are mostly using different mobile phones even if there is only a slight difference. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 11:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be some sort of super organized meat puppetry, I'm guessing an editing firm now. Just found another account Atttx67. @Oshwah and AmandaNP:CUPIDICAE💕 14:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Atttx67  Likely Expert7820. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 12:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21 February 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Our ever so friendly TOU violator is back with Draft:Miri Rodriguez CUPIDICAE💕 15:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

23 March 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Clearly the same user, bungling page moves, edits to Matthew Knowles. See for example this move which was originally about Michael Gorton, which is a tell for socks here, making it unclear what they're actually moving to mainspace. VAXIDICAE💉 16:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
-- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05 April 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Very obviously Xenen, rapid fire creation, weird edit summaries, creation of articles on academics. Confirmed by cu on simple, requesting a sleeper check here since they usually have several going at once VAXIDICAE💉 15:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is almost certainly related to this long term paid farm aka WikiExperts. VAXIDICAE💉 15:20, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Mz7, unfortunately the underlying range and pattern of data is rather annoying, but it is as much of a technical match as possible. Behaviorally, though the English Wikipedia edits may not necessarily fit the pattern, it does on the Simple English Wikipedia. Best, Vermont (talk) 02:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Vermont: Fair enough. I'm convinced again after seeing some of the account's early edits [1] and simplewiki edits [2].  Blocked and tagged again. Mz7 (talk) 03:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13 April 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

This is newly created sock, created after the last bunch of puppets were blocked earlier this month. This sock's history, shows that they immediately began editing the page, Sowemimo Abiodun, which had been recently edited by another sock, User:Forcivef20. A comparison of the changes by each show a definite similarity. See this and this. Onel5969 TT me 14:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

18 April 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

this edit and this edit on an article ripe with puppets are very similar. Both from newly created SPA accounts. Onel5969 TT me 13:35, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

26 April 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Already locked, filing for sleeper check. Terzxx10 is a disclosed alt of Terrzxx12, who recreated Ahmed Musa Dangiwa. --Blablubbs|talk 09:42, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

30 August 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


All of the above are UPE prone subjects. Also common edit summaries, and a certain unlikely tell on Commons. I also think Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sadeeqzaria is the same user.

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
I'm going to have to look at each of the spam articles created by the two new accounts. I'll post here once I'm done. MER-C 08:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Cleanup done for these accounts here, images checked. Now to look at simple.wp. MER-C 12:19, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to report from simple.wp. I think Toshikenan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is also them, but there is no link to the existing articles. MER-C 18:18, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Waloowal16 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) may also be them. MER-C 11:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19 November 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Very similar edit summary patterns as previous blocked socks. Three socks I saw are Abzskhd8065 (compare this summary by Mukaigurin with this summary by the sock), Tarell005 and Jasmine441 (latter two are socks found on simplewiki, both blocked at enwiki and glocked). Combimed with a similar focus on BLPs, especially Nigerian ones, I felt that this was very, very obvious. Requesting CU as there doesn't seem to have been a check in a while, and CU has turned up sleepers in the past. JavaHurricane 12:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also see the editing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InstaShop, which was affected by lots of sockpuppetry. JavaHurricane 13:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

This case is being reviewed by Spicy as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

09 January 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


We haven't had a sweep of this sockpuppeteer lately. Spam at Special:Undelete/Sebastian-Justus Schmidt, characteristic edit summaries (compare Mukaigurin). The other two are already locked but are included for the purpose of getting more data and context. MER-C 14:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

09 May 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Pro-forma, based on off-wiki evidence. Lilio11 is already confirmed, but there's probably more where these came from. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

18 July 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Possible UPE sock/meatpuppets involved in creating and trying to preserve a whitewashed promotional version (this rev) of Mandla Lamba.

  • These three users made the only edits of actual substance before the article was rewritten, all other edits were maintenance. Very curious, because subject of article turned out to be a known fraudster.
  • Lamini12/Lamieni55: similar names, created one day apart, both did just enough to attain autoconfirmed before creating initial page and moving back to mainspace after it got draftified.
  • Gingie11: likely sleeper shows up to defend at AfD, also contributed small edit. Contribs shows vandal/inactive that abruptly starts taking interest in AfDs on 28 Jun — possible attempt to "establish cover" first (Mandla Lamba AfD nom was made on 26 Jun)
  • After article was rewritten, Gingie11 persistently seeks to restore "desired" version, gets blocked. Lamini12 takes over, then gives up(?). Notice that both undo edits one by one rather than revert in a single edit. Disruption appears to have ceased (for now at least)
  • Found a conversation between admins that suggests possible connection to previous cases
    • Gingie11 made page moves about Momar Sakanoko, obsession of Williamchaupin sockfarm
    • Gingie11 similar name to sockmaster Ginginie11 which has sock Lilio11 (probably more suspected, but no sleepers detected at that time)
  • Similar edit summary wording "Highlight (for)" across users: Lamini12, Lamieni55, Ginginie11, Lilio11 and simple:Special:Contributions/Gingie11

CU requested to 1) confirm/refute sockpuppetry 2) establish any connection to Gingie11/Lilio11 3) check for additional sleepers

Thanks in advance to CUs/clerks. 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 21:14, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

19 July 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

brand new account, just happened to find Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mandla_Lamba Star Mississippi 22:38, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

06 September 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


  • This log search makes it clear that these accounts are the same person; GMB Hafinew created Nancy Davis (Quadratic Capital) on the 4th, it was deleted an hour later, and recreated exactly two days and four minutes after its original creation by Femvxa12Wa.
  • Both accounts' first edit was to their user pages, and they both made just enough edits to reach autoconfirmed before creating the page.
  • Both have "mobile edit" and "mobile web edit" on their edits — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 11:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

09 October 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Single-purpose account to get Mandla Lamba deleted after previous sox were unable to get it to have their preferred content. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 10:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This appears related to a similar situation documented partially at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Jain (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 February 24. I found Nancy Davis Quadratic while looking at the scope of the problems with the Naveen Jain AfD. --Hipal (talk) 21:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I was researching this sequence of events yesterday with a view to requesting undeletion, and today I see there's now Draft:Nancy Davis (businesswoman). Regarding the comment "All UPEs either way, but, any idea what happened there", I voted keep at the AfD and I'm not a UPE. Anyway, thanks for blocking the socks and hopefully the article can be recreated better this time round. Mujinga (talk) 11:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

15 November 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

See consolidated contributions [5]: Both signup on October 28th, less than one hour apart, and make exactly 3 edits to their user pages. Then came back in November, one day apart, to create some spam articles. See also editing style, there are some more tells. Given the UPE(Z) smell here, I'm requesting a check. MarioGom (talk) 18:39, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

17 December 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Blocked as a duck per Special:Undelete/Daniel Niles vs. Special:Undelete/Draft:Dan Niles (content, ESes, and usernames). CU requested per history of sleepers. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 07:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

18 January 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

I noticed these accounts acting suspiciously over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Klein (strategist). Puvasoca has an interest in Daniel Kelley (hacker) (uploading commons:File:Daniel 4.jpg and adding it to the article), which has been frequented by previous socks; this account also uses similar phrasing to previous socks (compare "per Google search" in [6] with [7][8][9] etc.). Sabomancoo backed up Puvasoca in the Matt Klein AfD, and the two use similar language (compare "has pass" in [10] with [11]). Both accounts share some fairly clear edit-summary similarities (etc.) with previous socks; happy to elaborate if necessary. Requesting CU to look for sleepers. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

26 January 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

This one didn't come up on the last check, but I think it's pretty clearly a match: the account creation date matches that of previous socks (compare [12] with [13][14][15]), Isihu created the Matt Klein (strategist) article that attracted Ameerah1 socks when it was AfD'd, Isihu is interested in Seema Jaswal ([16][17][18]) just like previous socks ([19][20]), and there are clear edit-summary similarities. Requesting CU to confirm and to look for sleepers. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salvio giuliano, any sleepers? Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
None that I could easily see. Salvio giuliano 19:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Extraordinary Writ: I stand corrected. Akashirev (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) could be another, but  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation Salvio giuliano 19:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

25 February 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Account created 14 February. A dozen precocious edits (mostly today), then recreated Pandit Dasa at Pandit Das. Pandit Dasa was created by User:Plingkow, a sock of Bodiadub, and then deleted at AFD. 2A01:4C8:63:A8F0:C898:9FFF:FEAF:9F3E (talk) 11:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

08 May 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Bunch of obvious socks at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremiah Thoronka. Spam pages: Dan Niles, Terrence Keeley (recreation from previous SPI under same name), Jeremiah Thoronka, Uplift11 Sports, Dhanush Dinesh, Adamu Garba Jauro, Anne Therese Gennari, Hélène Huby, Kerop D. Janoyan, Elgi Equipments. Behavior similar to previous blocked socks. MER-C 11:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • MER-C - these accounts are all dotting about the same wide, spammy, socky ranges as each other, which have also been used by Ameerah1. Each one uses a different distinct UA, which are different from the ones the last bunch of socks used, but those might be spoofed. I guess I'm in  Possible territory - if you're confident based on the behaviour, block away. Girth Summit (blether) 12:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks. Blocked and tagged, Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested. MER-C 12:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

18 December 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Both accounts are focused on promoting Rheanna Cartier with the same text, see e.g. Draft:Rheanna Cartier, User:Jackjones122, User:Modelnews/sandbox. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 02:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like the further I poke, the more layers this has. Draft:Rheanna Cartier was previously created by Expert7820, who is blocked as a sock of Xenen1970, which apparently traces back to Ameerah1, so this may be linked to that case. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 02:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

15 February 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Sleeper account created 28 October 2022, created a userpage, and went to sleep. 31 May 2023, wakes up to remove an advert tag from an article heavily edited by blocked sock User:Ashavawani [23]. Another long sleep, then wakes up today, games autoconfirm, and recreates Jeremiah Thoronka, last created by sock User:Hammidh44. Requesting checkuser to check for more sleepers. Wikishovel (talk) 11:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ameerah1/Archive&oldid=1217694417"