Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 December 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 22

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:57, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; should be merged with European Parliament election, 1984 (West Germany) or deleted Frietjes (talk) 21:49, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, redundant to the table in European Parliament election, 1984 (Ireland) Frietjes (talk) 21:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, should be merged with European Parliament election, 1984 (Belgium) or deleted Frietjes (talk) 21:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates the tables in European Parliament election, 1979 (United Kingdom) Frietjes (talk) 21:46, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; duplicates the table in European Parliament election, 1979 (Ireland) Frietjes (talk) 21:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 21:33, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 21:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; should be added to the article or deleted Frietjes (talk) 21:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 21:30, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Category:Subtemplates of Template Encode

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:05, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

all unused; could be speedy deleted as subpages of Template:Encode? Frietjes (talk) 21:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

duplicates Template:Eugen d'Albert Frietjes (talk) 19:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 18:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; violates MOS:ICON Frietjes (talk) 18:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 18:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:François-Adrien Boieldieu Frietjes (talk) 18:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Philippe Boesmans Frietjes (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Berlioz compositions Frietjes (talk) 18:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Alban Berg Frietjes (talk) 18:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Arthur Honegger Frietjes (talk) 18:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Haydn operas (horizontal) Frietjes (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Carlisle Floyd Frietjes (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Carl Nielsen works Frietjes (talk) 18:42, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Otto Nicolai Frietjes (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Felix Mendelssohn Frietjes (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Albert Lortzing Frietjes (talk) 18:40, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Franz Schreker Frietjes (talk) 18:39, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Arnold Schoenberg Frietjes (talk) 18:38, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov Frietjes (talk) 18:38, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Template:Aribert Reimann Frietjes (talk) 18:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, replaced by Template:Mieczysław Weinberg Frietjes (talk) 18:24, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 18:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 18:01, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 18:01, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused; should be moved to an article (or changed to an article) or deleted Frietjes (talk) 18:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 17:59, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused fork of Template:Victoria Louise class armored cruiser which could be moved to this title Frietjes (talk) 17:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates the timeline in the article Frietjes (talk) 17:54, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 December 30. Killiondude (talk) 08:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Db-f3. Killiondude (talk) 07:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This Creative Commons license has a restriction on derivative works making any file uploaded with this license eligible for WP:F3 aside from usage as non-free content. In the rare case that a file with such a license is being used as non-free content, the existing copyright templates are sufficient for licensing and documentation. As such, there is no real use for this template. Whpq (talk) 01:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those rare case when a Fair Use image is licensed under CC BY-ND 2.5 IN, we need this template. Hence, do not delete.
Then such a file is non-free, in which case the correct tag to use would be something in Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright tags -FASTILY 06:33, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:14, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Opal fares

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Killiondude (talk) 07:54, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTMIRROR. It's essentially content uplifted from the Transport for Sydney website. Even smart card operators in other cities do not have lists of fares on their wikipedia articles. Ajf773 (talk) 19:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:52, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Useful information, helps describe the fare system, contains information that goes beyond what is shown on operators website (eg. Airport gate fees which are interpolated) Moa999 (talk) 02:54, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Whether or not it's useful is irrelevant. It's directly copied from the Transport from NSW website and solely exists as a table of ticket prices.... no encyclopedic value and does not comply with WP:NOTGUIDE. There is no reason why basic ticketing content (minus exactly fares in local currency) cannot be included in mainspace. Ajf773 (talk) 09:49, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    See London's Oyster card for a similar major transport card that also lists pricing. The only difference here is that the information is formatted in easy to read tables, which were put into a template at some point for easier sharing between a number of pages. Per prior comment you also Cannot find the Airport Gate fees on the operators website, it has been interpolated from individual station fare calculations Moa999 (talk) 14:30, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    London's Oyster Card has no templates with a table of comprehensive pricing. It is not the purpose of Wikipedia to prove fare breakdowns using a transport operators fare calculator, particularly when these change rapidly. There is no reason why a fare structure cannot be simplified in prose form to something more encyclopedic, per Oyster Card. These two templates in the TfD go against everything that is the norm. Ajf773 (talk) 17:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Provides a simple summary of prices for wikireaders of other places who want to find out about pricing systems of Sydney, yet are not actually travelling to Sydney (just understanding the fare system). In addition, fare info that has been spread across different TfNSW webpages are summarised in a single wiki article through those two templates.Marcnut1996 (talk) 03:47, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 December 30. Killiondude (talk) 07:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).