Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 December 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 10

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:36, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created and probably redundant to {{Infobox sportsperson}}. I made it into a wrapper for that template, but have been reverted. Has just 15 transclusions. The long list of sponsor parameters are trivia and should probably be discarded. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Do not merge/Split or essentially, Delete Template:Top level men's association football leagues around the world and keep the remaining templates Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging or reverse merging Template:Top level men's association football leagues around the world with Template:AFC leagues, Template:CAF leagues, Template:CONCACAF leagues, Template:CONMEBOL leagues, Template:OFC leagues, Template:UEFA leagues or delete Template:Top level men's association football leagues around the world.
{{Top level men's association football leagues around the world}} is mainly folk of {{AFC leagues}}, {{CAF leagues}}, {{CONCACAF leagues}}, {{CONMEBOL leagues}}, {{OFC leagues}} and {{UEFA leagues}} Hhkohh (talk) 15:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:44, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; the core links all point to one article Frietjes (talk) 14:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym: You'll find a lot of sports teams navboxes are like that - they also include a lot of additional tangential links such as TV stations in order to pad them out. Picking one at random: {{London Lightning}} --woodensuperman 11:27, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Seems both were created by the same editor, how unsurprising. --Gonnym (talk) 11:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:51, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; seems unlikely that it is being substituted, since it would not substitute cleanly Frietjes (talk) 14:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:51, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Userfy. Userfying as the page creator requested it to be kept around. Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:43, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Will userfy per request. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; could be moved to userspace Frietjes (talk) 14:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template is being used now.Pennsy22 (talk) 03:38, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; all red links Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; probably because density can be automatically computed from population and area. Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn Frietjes (talk) 18:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: At that time, I used this template in articles for some historic Korean people. But I don't know why this template was removed. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 14:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 20. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per already closed AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1960–61 United States network television schedule (Saturday morning) and soon to be closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1980–81 United States network television schedule (Saturday morning) all articles will be deleted and this template will no longer serve any purpose. Ajf773 (talk) 09:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).