Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 September 7
September 7
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:04, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Not really a template, but not a category as the maker may have intended; redundant to a better-designed template. Her Pegship (speak) 23:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:04, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
unused Frietjes (talk) 20:08, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:04, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Template:WhiteButton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused Frietjes (talk) 20:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:00, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
unused Frietjes (talk) 20:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as G8 (Template:Wikmenu2 doesn't exist) {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete G8 Hhkohh (talk) 13:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:04, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
unused Frietjes (talk) 20:03, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Won't purge (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused Frietjes (talk) 20:03, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This is a cleanup template that places an image into a category. As Category:All_pages_that_won't_purge says, it is common if not expected that there will be no articles that fit. This is the nature of cleanup tags (see also Category:Images for Cleanup. As such, this tag should only be considered for deletion along with its category, and the category should only be deleted if it is considered not useful--not merely because it is not currently used.
- keep Although this template is unused, this template is tracking template, maybe use in future Hhkohh (talk) 13:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 15. (non-admin closure) Kpgjhpjm 09:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 15. (non-admin closure) Kpgjhpjm 09:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:04, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Template:XSony (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:XMicrosoft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused Frietjes (talk) 19:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Orientls (talk) 08:23, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 15. (non-admin closure) Kpgjhpjm 09:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 15. (non-admin closure) Kpgjhpjm 09:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by GeneralizationsAreBad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
unused; if needed, could be added to an article directly. Frietjes (talk) 19:57, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete agree with nom. I can't really see how a template like this could be used across several articles. Just noticed it being added to the lead of Early Years Foundation Stage, where it was completely out of place. Aiken D 21:52, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- I should also add that the template is incorrect/incomplete as children will inevitably change age during an academic year, which is not shown. There is also the issue of middle schools which are not shown, and of private schools. Aiken D 21:55, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 15. (non-admin closure) Kpgjhpjm 09:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 15. (non-admin closure) Kpgjhpjm 09:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:47, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Nettwerk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Record label rosters not suitable for navbox inclusion per longstanding precedent. --woodensuperman 15:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 21:40, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Orientls (talk) 08:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Per G7 (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 15:22, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Messed up template hueman1 (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- @HueMan1: You don't need a formal TfD for this; you are the only contributor, so you may use
{{db-author}}
. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 16. Primefac (talk) 03:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Crowded_enz (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 16. Primefac (talk) 03:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Wizarding_World (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).