Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/GH avisualagency™

Explanation of latest edit

I've deleted the reference to WP:BIO in the header for two reasons. One, those guidelines refer to articles on individuals; this article is clearly about a group of individuals, and is also about a corporate entity best covered by WP:CORP. Two, it doesn't seem appropriate for the article's author and primary defender to try to set the guidelines for voting, as he is assumed to be conflicted. As always, I welcome feedback. | Klaw ¡digame! 04:58, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

you are totally mistaken on all counts. i am the one whose comments you keep on deleting, NOT lerner's. why do you persist in accusing us of being the same person? this is utterly preposterous as well as outright slander. please be aware that deleting other users' comments and votes is considered vandalism and is not tolerated by the wikipedia community. this is the 3rd time that you have done this. stop or i will have to report you to the administrators. Inspectorpanther 18:10, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to Wikipedia's vandalism policy for a description of what is and is not considered vandalism. For example, when you blanked my user page section by section over six consecutive edits [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6], that was vandalism. So stop making pointless threats. | Klaw ¡digame! 18:30, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

* i made a mistake and the appropriate measures were followed. please stop harassing me. Inspectorpanther 22:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You have absolutely no evidence to support the claim that I'm harassing you. On the contrary, you have been attacking me, vandalizing my user page, saying that I am "crazy" here, placing unsigned vandalism warnings on my talk page [7] [8], and making these false allegations. Asking you to justify your comments does not qualify as harassment. | Klaw ¡digame! 19:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]