Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


The androgen and glucocorticoid hormones evoke specific in vivo responses by activating different sets of responsive genes. Although the consensus sequences of the glucocorticoid and androgen response elements are very similar, this in vivo specificity can in some cases be explained by differences in DNA recognition between both receptors. This has clearly been demonstrated for the androgen response element PB-ARE-2 described in the promoter of the rat probasin gene. Swapping of different fragments between the androgen- and glucocorticoid-receptor DNA-binding domains demonstrates that (i) the first Zn-finger module is not involved in this sequence selectivity and (ii) that residues in the second Zn-finger as well as a C-terminal extension of the DNA-binding domain from the androgen receptor are required. For specific and high-affinity binding to response elements, the DNA-binding domains of the androgen and glucocorticoid receptors need a different C-terminal extension. The glucocorticoid receptor requires 12 C-terminal amino acids for high affinity DNA binding, while the androgen receptor only involves four residues. However, for specific recognition of the PB-ARE-2, the androgen receptor also requires 12 C-terminal residues. Our data demonstrate that the mechanism by which the androgen receptor binds selectively to the PB-ARE-2 is different from that used by the glucocorticoid receptor to bind a consensus response element. We would like to suggest that the androgen receptor recognizes response elements as a direct repeat rather than the classical inverted repeat.

Free full text 


Logo of biochemjLink to Publisher's site
Biochem J. 1999 Aug 1; 341(Pt 3): 515–521.
PMCID: PMC1220386
PMID: 10417312

Differential DNA binding by the androgen and glucocorticoid receptors involves the second Zn-finger and a C-terminal extension of the DNA-binding domains.

Abstract

The androgen and glucocorticoid hormones evoke specific in vivo responses by activating different sets of responsive genes. Although the consensus sequences of the glucocorticoid and androgen response elements are very similar, this in vivo specificity can in some cases be explained by differences in DNA recognition between both receptors. This has clearly been demonstrated for the androgen response element PB-ARE-2 described in the promoter of the rat probasin gene. Swapping of different fragments between the androgen- and glucocorticoid-receptor DNA-binding domains demonstrates that (i) the first Zn-finger module is not involved in this sequence selectivity and (ii) that residues in the second Zn-finger as well as a C-terminal extension of the DNA-binding domain from the androgen receptor are required. For specific and high-affinity binding to response elements, the DNA-binding domains of the androgen and glucocorticoid receptors need a different C-terminal extension. The glucocorticoid receptor requires 12 C-terminal amino acids for high affinity DNA binding, while the androgen receptor only involves four residues. However, for specific recognition of the PB-ARE-2, the androgen receptor also requires 12 C-terminal residues. Our data demonstrate that the mechanism by which the androgen receptor binds selectively to the PB-ARE-2 is different from that used by the glucocorticoid receptor to bind a consensus response element. We would like to suggest that the androgen receptor recognizes response elements as a direct repeat rather than the classical inverted repeat.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (232K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Evans RM. The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science. 1988 May 13;240(4854):889–895. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Luisi BF, Xu WX, Otwinowski Z, Freedman LP, Yamamoto KR, Sigler PB. Crystallographic analysis of the interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with DNA. Nature. 1991 Aug 8;352(6335):497–505. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Zilliacus J, Wright AP, Norinder U, Gustafsson JA, Carlstedt-Duke J. Determinants for DNA-binding site recognition by the glucocorticoid receptor. J Biol Chem. 1992 Dec 15;267(35):24941–24947. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Dahlman-Wright K, Wright A, Gustafsson JA, Carlstedt-Duke J. Interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding domain with DNA as a dimer is mediated by a short segment of five amino acids. J Biol Chem. 1991 Feb 15;266(5):3107–3112. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Umesono K, Evans RM. Determinants of target gene specificity for steroid/thyroid hormone receptors. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1139–1146. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Remerowski ML, Kellenbach E, Boelens R, van der Marel GA, van Boom JH, Maler BA, Yamamoto KR, Kaptein R. 1H NMR studies of DNA recognition by the glucocorticoid receptor: complex of the DNA binding domain with a half-site response element. Biochemistry. 1991 Dec 17;30(50):11620–11624. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hsieh JC, Jurutka PW, Selznick SH, Reeder MC, Haussler CA, Whitfield GK, Haussler MR. The T-box near the zinc fingers of the human vitamin D receptor is required for heterodimeric DNA binding and transactivation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995 Oct 4;215(1):1–7. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rastinejad F, Perlmann T, Evans RM, Sigler PB. Structural determinants of nuclear receptor assembly on DNA direct repeats. Nature. 1995 May 18;375(6528):203–211. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Terenzi H, Alzari PM, Zakin MM. Structural features involved in the formation of a complex between the monomeric or the dimeric form of the rev-erb beta DNA-binding domain and its DNA reactive sites. Biochemistry. 1998 Aug 18;37(33):11488–11495. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson TE, Paulsen RE, Padgett KA, Milbrandt J. Participation of non-zinc finger residues in DNA binding by two nuclear orphan receptors. Science. 1992 Apr 3;256(5053):107–110. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee MS, Kliewer SA, Provencal J, Wright PE, Evans RM. Structure of the retinoid X receptor alpha DNA binding domain: a helix required for homodimeric DNA binding. Science. 1993 May 21;260(5111):1117–1121. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Beato M. Gene regulation by steroid hormones. Cell. 1989 Feb 10;56(3):335–344. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Funder JW. Mineralocorticoids, glucocorticoids, receptors and response elements. Science. 1993 Feb 19;259(5098):1132–1133. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Archer TK, Zaniewski E, Moyer ML, Nordeen SK. The differential capacity of glucocorticoids and progestins to alter chromatin structure and induce gene expression in human breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol. 1994 Sep;8(9):1154–1162. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lambert JR, Nordeen SK. Steroid-selective initiation of chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter is controlled by the site of promoter integration. J Biol Chem. 1998 Dec 4;273(49):32708–32714. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Adler AJ, Scheller A, Robins DM. The stringency and magnitude of androgen-specific gene activation are combinatorial functions of receptor and nonreceptor binding site sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Oct;13(10):6326–6335. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou Z, Corden JL, Brown TR. Identification and characterization of a novel androgen response element composed of a direct repeat. J Biol Chem. 1997 Mar 28;272(13):8227–8235. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Roche PJ, Hoare SA, Parker MG. A consensus DNA-binding site for the androgen receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 1992 Dec;6(12):2229–2235. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rennie PS, Bruchovsky N, Leco KJ, Sheppard PC, McQueen SA, Cheng H, Snoek R, Hamel A, Bock ME, MacDonald BS, et al. Characterization of two cis-acting DNA elements involved in the androgen regulation of the probasin gene. Mol Endocrinol. 1993 Jan;7(1):23–36. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Claessens F, Alen P, Devos A, Peeters B, Verhoeven G, Rombauts W. The androgen-specific probasin response element 2 interacts differentially with androgen and glucocorticoid receptors. J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 9;271(32):19013–19016. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Chang CS, Kokontis J, Liao ST. Structural analysis of complementary DNA and amino acid sequences of human and rat androgen receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Oct;85(19):7211–7215. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hollenberg SM, Giguere V, Segui P, Evans RM. Colocalization of DNA-binding and transcriptional activation functions in the human glucocorticoid receptor. Cell. 1987 Apr 10;49(1):39–46. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Tan JA, Joseph DR, Quarmby VE, Lubahn DB, Sar M, French FS, Wilson EM. The rat androgen receptor: primary structure, autoregulation of its messenger ribonucleic acid, and immunocytochemical localization of the receptor protein. Mol Endocrinol. 1988 Dec;2(12):1276–1285. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Miesfeld R, Rusconi S, Godowski PJ, Maler BA, Okret S, Wikström AC, Gustafsson JA, Yamamoto KR. Genetic complementation of a glucocorticoid receptor deficiency by expression of cloned receptor cDNA. Cell. 1986 Aug 1;46(3):389–399. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Arriza JL, Weinberger C, Cerelli G, Glaser TM, Handelin BL, Housman DE, Evans RM. Cloning of human mineralocorticoid receptor complementary DNA: structural and functional kinship with the glucocorticoid receptor. Science. 1987 Jul 17;237(4812):268–275. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kastner P, Krust A, Turcotte B, Stropp U, Tora L, Gronemeyer H, Chambon P. Two distinct estrogen-regulated promoters generate transcripts encoding the two functionally different human progesterone receptor forms A and B. EMBO J. 1990 May;9(5):1603–1614. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • De Vos P, Schmitt J, Verhoeven G, Stunnenberg HG. Human androgen receptor expressed in HeLa cells activates transcription in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Apr 11;22(7):1161–1166. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Claessens F, Celis L, Peeters B, Heyns W, Verhoeven G, Rombauts W. Functional characterization of an androgen response element in the first intron of the C3(1) gene of prostatic binding protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989 Oct 31;164(2):833–840. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rundlett SE, Miesfeld RL. Quantitative differences in androgen and glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding properties contribute to receptor-selective transcriptional regulation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1995 Mar;109(1):1–10. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Scheller A, Hughes E, Golden KL, Robins DM. Multiple receptor domains interact to permit, or restrict, androgen-specific gene activation. J Biol Chem. 1998 Sep 11;273(37):24216–24222. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rusconi S, Yamamoto KR. Functional dissection of the hormone and DNA binding activities of the glucocorticoid receptor. EMBO J. 1987 May;6(5):1309–1315. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Mader S, Chambon P, White JH. Defining a minimal estrogen receptor DNA binding domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Mar 11;21(5):1125–1132. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hsu MH, Palmer CN, Song W, Griffin KJ, Johnson EF. A carboxyl-terminal extension of the zinc finger domain contributes to the specificity and polarity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor DNA binding. J Biol Chem. 1998 Oct 23;273(43):27988–27997. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Sem DS, Casimiro DR, Kliewer SA, Provencal J, Evans RM, Wright PE. NMR spectroscopic studies of the DNA-binding domain of the monomer-binding nuclear orphan receptor, human estrogen related receptor-2. The carboxyl-terminal extension to the zinc-finger region is unstructured in the free form of the protein. J Biol Chem. 1997 Jul 18;272(29):18038–18043. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Aumais JP, Lee HS, DeGannes C, Horsford J, White JH. Function of directly repeated half-sites as response elements for steroid hormone receptors. J Biol Chem. 1996 May 24;271(21):12568–12577. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Zechel C, Shen XQ, Chen JY, Chen ZP, Chambon P, Gronemeyer H. The dimerization interfaces formed between the DNA binding domains of RXR, RAR and TR determine the binding specificity and polarity of the full-length receptors to direct repeats. EMBO J. 1994 Mar 15;13(6):1425–1433. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/5424905
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/5424905

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1042/bj3410515

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
0
54
0

Article citations


Go to all (64) article citations

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.