Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


We report two cases of imported infection in patients who had returned to Taiwan from Singapore: one was coinfected with chikungunya virus and dengue virus type 2, and the other was infected with the same dengue virus. Both viruses were successfully isolated from the coinfected case by using antibody neutralization and a plaque purification technique.

Free full text 


Logo of jcmLink to Publisher's site
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Dec; 48(12): 4586–4589.
Published online 2010 Sep 29. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01228-10
PMCID: PMC3008485
PMID: 20881182

Concurrent Isolation of Chikungunya Virus and Dengue Virus from a Patient with Coinfection Resulting from a Trip to Singapore [down-pointing small open triangle]

Abstract

We report two cases of imported infection in patients who had returned to Taiwan from Singapore: one was coinfected with chikungunya virus and dengue virus type 2, and the other was infected with the same dengue virus. Both viruses were successfully isolated from the coinfected case by using antibody neutralization and a plaque purification technique.

Dengue fever, caused by a flavivirus in the family Flaviviridae, is the most prevalent arboviral disease in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia, the Pacific and Caribbean islands, and Central and South America (9). Chikungunya, caused by an alphavirus in the family Togaviridae, is endemic to Africa and Asia (12). Both diseases are transmitted to humans by day-biting Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes, and both diseases have similar clinical symptoms, including fever, rash, and joint pains as well as headache, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and muscle pain; a laboratory test is required to distinguish between the two diseases. Thus, many risk factors for chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and dengue virus (DENV) infections are the same or similar. The urban mosquito Aedes aegypti is the primary vector of both viruses throughout most of their geographic range, although Aedes albopictus was recently identified as the main vector of the recently emerged CHIKV E1-226V variant of the African genotype (17).

The explosive epidemics of chikungunya in Indian Ocean islands and India since 2004 and the worldwide increase in travel have facilitated the expansion of different strains of CHIKV of the African genotype into overlap areas where DENV is endemic (13). As a result, cocirculation of CHIKV and DENV has been reported in various geographic areas, including India, Sri Lanka, Gabon, Cameroon, Madagascar, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. Consequently, a few studies showing patients coinfected with CHIKV and DENV have been reported in India, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, and Gabon (1, 5, 8, 11, 14). Although molecular and serologic evidence demonstrated or suggested coinfections in the above-mentioned reports, neither CHIKV nor DENV was isolated from these patients. Successful isolation of both viruses is needed to conduct basic and applied research on CHIKV and DENV biology, immunology, and pathogenesis, as well as the development of laboratory diagnosis, antiviral drugs, and vaccines.

The first and only concurrent isolation of CHIKV and DENV-2, from a single blood specimen taken from a patient in the acute phase of a dengue-like illness in southern India in 1964, was reported by Myers and Carey (10). In their study, the dominance of CHIKV in the coinfected patient's serum, along with growth competition, prevented the initial isolation of DENV-2; isolation was finally accomplished through pretreatment of the acute-phase serum sample with a CHIKV-specific mouse antibody, followed by inoculation into infant mice for in vivo growth. Here we report only the second case confirmed by actual isolation of CHIKV and DENV-2, from a patient returned from Singapore, using an in vitro cell culture technique.

The two patients with cases of imported infection reported by our hospital surveillance system were part of a group tour to Singapore from 17 to 20 April 2009. One patient (case 1) was coinfected with CHIKV and DENV-2, and the other, a sibling of case 1 (case 2), was infected with the same DENV-2 strain. Table Table11 shows the summary data from case 1, reported as a suspected dengue case on 23 April 2009. He had symptoms of fever, headache, vomiting, arthralgia, rash, and skin itch. Molecular screening for flavivirus and alphavirus infections using multiplex one-step SYBR green I-based real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) (15, 16) showed positive reactions to both alphavirus and DENV infections, suggesting the possibility of coinfection. Confirmation using specific primers showed positive reactions to CHIKV and DENV-2. The coinfection results were later confirmed by positive seroconversion of both CHIKV-specific and DENV-specific IgM and IgG antibodies in day 24 convalescent-phase serum samples. Case 2 had symptoms of fever, headache, muscle pain, and abdominal pain. The DENV-2 strain was successfully isolated from a day 4 acute-phase serum sample from case 2 by in vitro cell culture using the C6/36 cell line.

TABLE 1.

Summary data from a patient (case 1) coinfected with CHIKV and DENV imported from Singapore

ParameterDescription or result
PatientCase 1
InfectionsCHIKV and DENV-2
Age (yr)12
GenderMale
Travel period in Singapore17 to 20 April 2009
Onset of disease22 April 2009
Clinical symptomsFever
Headache
Vomiting
Arthralgia
Rash
Skin itch
Laboratory findings
    Real-time RT-PCR (day 2)CHIKV+, 105.6 PFU/ml
DENV-2+, 101.3 PFU/ml
    Virus isolation (day 2)CHIKV and DENV-2
    DENV IgM/IgG (day 2)a0.13/0.106
    DENV IgM/IgG (day 24)1.383/0.702
    CHIKV IgM/IgG (day 2)0.087/0.098
    CHIKV IgM/IgG (day 24)2.074/1.611
aOptical density at 405 nm, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

From the coinfected patient, CHIKV was readily isolated from the day 2 acute-phase serum sample by using the C6/36 cell line. However, initial isolation of DENV-2 was not successful, likely due to inferior growth competition with the dominant CHIKV. To eliminate the CHIKV, neutralization was attempted by pretreatment of the acute-phase serum with a day 17 convalescent-phase serum from a CHIKV patient (15). This serum had high-titer CHIKV-specific antibodies but no DENV-specific antibodies. Briefly, the acute-phase serum from case 1 was mixed with CHIKV convalescent-phase serum at a ratio of 1:2 for 1 h at 37°C, and then the mixture was seeded in BHK-21 cells in a 6-well plate overlaid with methylcellulose prepared in minimal essential medium (MEM)-5% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The culture was incubated at 37°C for 5 days, and single plaques were picked for expansion in Vero cells. All 24 clones were DENV-2 isolates, as confirmed by an immunofluorescence test and RT-PCR (9).

The nucleotide sequences of the envelope genes of the CHIKV and DENV-2 strains were determined as previously described (6, 15, 16). Figure Figure11 shows the phylogenetic tree of CHIKV constructed on the basis of the complete envelope 1 gene nucleotide sequence (13). The strain CHIK/Singapore/0904aTw was grouped into the Central/East/South African genotype, with an E1-226V mutation, a lineage different from that of our previous Singapore isolate, with an E1-226A mutation, and is closely related to strains isolated from Malaysia. Figure Figure22 shows the phylogenetic tree of DENV-2 constructed on the basis of the complete envelope gene nucleotide sequences (18). The two isolates D2/Singapore/0904aTw and D2/Singapore/0904bTw, derived from case 1 and case 2, respectively, had 100% nucleotide identity in their envelope genes and belonged to the Cosmopolitan genotype. Our data are in agreement with recent reports that E1-226V mutant CHIKV strains grouped into the Central/East/South African genotype and DENV-2 strains grouped into the Cosmopolitan genotype were predominant epidemic strains circulating in Singapore in 2009 (7, 19). As various genotypic strains may differ in epidemic potential and virulence, molecular epidemiological surveillance can provide valuable information in decision making regarding patient care, outbreak investigation, and control measures (2, 4).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zjm9990902530001.jpg

Phylogenetic analysis of the complete envelope 1 (E1) gene (1,317 nucleotides [nt]) of a chikungunya virus (CHIKV) isolate from a patient who had returned from Singapore coinfected with CHIKV and dengue virus. The sequence obtained in this study is designated by boldface type. CHIKV strains with the E1-A226V mutation are indicated. Viruses are identified by virus/country/strain/year of isolation/GenBank accession number. The analysis was performed using MEGA 4 software, with the neighbor-joining (maximum-composite-likelihood) method. Bootstrap support values of >60 are shown (1,000 replicates). The scale bar on the left indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zjm9990902530002.jpg

Phylogenetic analysis of the complete envelope gene (1,485 nt) of dengue virus type 2 isolates from two patients (case 1 and case 2) who had returned from Singapore. Sequences obtained in this study are designated by boldface type. Viruses are identified by virus/country/strain/year of isolation/GenBank accession number. The analysis was performed using MEGA 4 software, with the neighbor-joining (maximum-composite-likelihood) method. Bootstrap support values of >75 are shown (1,000 replicates). The scale bar on the left indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Successful isolation of both viruses from the coinfected case remains a challenge, since the dominant virus usually outgrows the minor virus. This problem can be overcome by a combination of virus neutralization using convalescent human serum with high-titer antibodies and in vitro plaque purification. Our results showed that this is a very efficient way to concurrently isolate both CHIKV and DENV-2. A similar approach has been used to isolate two DENV serotypes, DENV-1 and DENV-4, from a coinfected patient (3). With the expectation that cases of coinfection with DENV and CHIKV will become more prevalent in the future due to increased transmission of both viruses in various areas of India, Southeast Asia, and Africa, enhanced surveillance to clinically and diagnostically differentiate CHIKV and DENV infections is needed for early recognition of virus invasion and local transmission, better patient care, and timely control measures.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The nucleotide sequences of the envelope genes of the CHIKV and the two DENV-2 strains were submitted to GenBank under accession no. HM067743, HM067746, and HM067747.

Acknowledgments

We are most grateful to Duane J. Gubler for his valuable suggestions and comments and for critically reading and revising the manuscript.

This work is supported in part by grant 98-0324-01-F-20 from the National Research Program for Genome Medicine (sequence data based on the Taiwan Pathogenic Microorganism Genome Database, Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health, Execute Yuan, Taiwan) and by grant DOH98-DC-2010 from the Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.

Footnotes

[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 29 September 2010.

REFERENCES

1. Chahar, H. S., P. Bharaj, L. Dar, R. Guleria, S. K. Kabra, and S. Broor. 2009. Co-infections with chikungunya virus and dengue virus in Delhi, India. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15:1077-1080. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
2. de Lamballerie, X., E. Leroy, R. N. Charrel, K. Ttsetsarkin, S. Higgs, and E. A. Gould. 2008. Chikungunya virus adapts to tiger mosquito via evolutionary convergence: a sign of things to come? Virol. J. 5:33. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
3. Gubler, D. J., G. Kuno, G. E. Sather, and S. H. Waterman. 1985. A case of natural concurrent human infection with two dengue viruses. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 34:170-173. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
4. Hang, V. T. T., E. C. Holmes, D. Veasna, N. T. Quy, T. T. Hien, M. Quail, C. Churcher, J. Parkhill, J. Cardosa, J. Farrar, B. Wills, N. J. Lennon, B. W. Birren, P. Buchy, M. R. Henn, and C. P. Simmons. 2010. Emergence of the Asian 1 genotype of dengue virus serotype 2 in Viet Nam: in vivo fitness advantage and lineage replacement in South-East Asia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 4:757. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
5. Hapuarachchi, H. A., K. B. Bandara, M. D. Hapugoda, S. Williams, and W. Abeyewickreme. 2008. Laboratory confirmation of dengue and chikungunya co-infection. Ceylon Med. J. 53:104-105. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
6. Huang, J. H., C. F. Yang, C. L. Su, S. F. Chang, C. H. Cheng, S. K. Yu, C. C. Lin, and P. Y. Shu. 2009. Imported chikungunya virus strains, Taiwan, 2006-2009. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15:1854-1856. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
7. Lee, K. S., Y. L. Lai, S. Lo, T. Barkham, P. Aw, P. L. Ooi, J. C. Tai, M. Hibberd, P. Johansson, S. P. Khoo, and L. C. Ng. 2010. Dengue virus surveillance for early warning, Singapore. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16:8479-8849. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
8. Leroy, E. M., D. Nkoghe, B. Ollomo, C. Nze-Nkogue, P. Becquart, G. Grard, X. Pourrut, R. Charrel, G. Moureau, A. Ndjoyi-Mbiguino, and X. De-Lamballerie. 2009. Concurrent chikungunya and dengue virus infections during simultaneous outbreaks, Gabon, 2007. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15:591-593. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
9. Mackenzie, J. S., D. J. Gubler, and L. R. Petersen. 2004. Emerging flaviviruses: the spread and resurgence of Japanese encephalitis, West Nile and dengue viruses. Nat. Med. 10:S98-S109. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
10. Myers, R. M., and D. E. Carey. 1967. Concurrent isolation from patient of two arboviruses, Chikungunya and dengue type 2. Science 157:1307-1308. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
11. Nayar, S. K., O. Noridah, V. Paranthaman, K. Ranjit, I. Norizah, Y. K. Chem, B. Mustafa, and K. B. Chua. 2007. Co-infection of dengue virus and chikungunya virus in two patients with acute febrile illness. Med. J. Malaysia 62:335-336. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
12. Powers, A. M., A. C. Brault, R. B. Tesh, and S. C. Weaver. 2000. Re-emergence of Chikungunya and O'nyong-nyong viruses: evidence for distinct geographical lineages and distant evolutionary relationships. J. Gen. Virol. 81:471-479. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
13. Powers, A. M., and C. H. Logue. 2007. Changing patterns of chikungunya virus: re-emergence of a zoonotic arbovirus. J. Gen. Virol. 88:2363-2377. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
14. Schilling, S., P. Emmerich, S. Günther, and J. Schmidt-Chanasit. 2009. Dengue and Chikungunya virus co-infection in a German traveller. J. Clin. Virol. 45:163-164. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
15. Shu, P. Y., C. F. Yang, C. L. Su, C. Y. Chen, S. F. Chang, K. H. Tsai, C. H. Cheng, and J. H. Huang. 2008. Two imported chikungunya cases, Taiwan. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14:1325-1326. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
16. Shu, P. Y., L. J. Chien, S. F. Chang, C. L. Su, Y. C. Kuo, T. L. Liao, M. S. Ho, T. H. Lin, and J. H. Huang. 2005. Fever screening at airports and imported dengue. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:460-462. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
17. Tsetsarkin, K. A., D. L. Vanlandingham, C. E. McGee, and S. Higgs. 2007. A single mutation in chikungunya virus affects vector specificity and epidemic potential. PLoS Pathog. 3:e201. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030201. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Twiddy, S. S., J. J. Farrar, N. Vinh Chau, B. Wills, E. A. Gould, T. Gritsun, G. Lloyd, and E. C. Holmes. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships and differential selection pressures among genotypes of dengue-2 virus. Virology 298:63-72. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
19. Yap, G., K. Y. Pok, Y. L. Lai, H. C. Hapuarachchi, A. Chow, Y. S. Leo, L. K. Tan, and L. C. Ng. 2010. Evaluation of chikungunya diagnostic assays: differences in sensitivity of serology assays in two independent outbreaks. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 4:753. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations
Jump to Data

Citations of article over time

Article citations


Go to all (36) article citations

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.