Abstract
Free full text
Citrate Accumulation-Related Gene Expression and/or Enzyme Activity Analysis Combined With Metabolomics Provide a Novel Insight for an Orange Mutant
Abstract
‘Hong Anliu’ (HAL, Citrus sinensis cv. Hong Anliu) is a bud mutant of ‘Anliu’ (AL), characterized by a comprehensive metabolite alteration, such as lower accumulation of citrate, high accumulation of lycopene and soluble sugars in fruit juice sacs. Due to carboxylic acid metabolism connects other metabolite biosynthesis and/or catabolism networks, we therefore focused analyzing citrate accumulation-related gene expression profiles and/or enzyme activities, along with metabolic fingerprinting between ‘HAL’ and ‘AL’. Compared with ‘AL’, the transcript levels of citrate biosynthesis- and utilization-related genes and/or the activities of their respective enzymes such as citrate synthase, cytosol aconitase and ATP-citrate lyase were significantly higher in ‘HAL’. Nevertheless, the mitochondrial aconitase activity, the gene transcript levels of proton pumps, including vacuolar H+-ATPase, vacuolar H+-PPase, and the juice sac-predominant p-type proton pump gene (CsPH8) were significantly lower in ‘HAL’. These results implied that ‘HAL’ has higher abilities for citrate biosynthesis and utilization, but lower ability for the citrate uptake into vacuole compared with ‘AL’. Combined with the metabolites-analyzing results, a model was then established and suggested that the reduction in proton pump activity is the key factor for the low citrate accumulation and the comprehensive metabolite alterations as well in ‘HAL’.
An orange mutant named ‘Hong Anliu’ (HAL, Citrus sinensis cv. Hong Anliu) was first characterized by its high accumulation of lycopene, lower acid and higher soluble sugars in the fruit juice sacs during the ripening stage1. A recent metabolic analysis by Pan et al.2 indicated that many secondary metabolites, such as flavonoids, amino acids and lipids, also showed significant differences compared with the wild type orange ‘Anliu’ (AL). In the past few years, many researches have been done to investigate the possible reason for high accumulation of lycopene in ‘HAL’1,3,4,5,6. Although precious researches also identified many differentially expressed genes or differential proteins in ‘HAL’ as compared with in ‘AL’4,5,6, a possible mechanism to explain the comprehensive metabolite change in the mutant is not available at present.
In citrus fruit juice sacs, soluble carbohydrates, carotenoids, and some specific secondary metabolites accumulate and organic acid reduces in general as the fruit ripens7,8,9. The carbohydrates in the fruits are primarily from the source leaves, whereas the organic acids and other secondary metabolites synthesize locally in the fruits8,10. The carbon skeletons for all the locally synthesized metabolites come from carbohydrate catabolism through glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Glycolysis is the metabolic pathway that converts glucose into pyruvate, which transports actively into the mitochondrion where it oxidizes to produce acetyl-CoA or forms oxaloacetate (OAA) by the carboxylation. Moreover, phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), which is an intermediate in glycolysis, can also form OAA by the catalysis of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC, EC4.1.1.31). The TCA cycle begins with the condensation of acetyl-CoA and OAA to form citrate catalyzed by citrate synthase (CS, EC2.3.3.1). Subsequently, aconitase (Aco, EC4.2.1.3) isomerizes the citrate to isocitrate. Then, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH, EC1.1.1.42) dehydrogenizes the resulting isocitrate to yield α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), which converts to succinyl-CoA by the catalysis of α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase. The succinyl-CoA undergoes four steps to produce OAA via the formation of succinate, fumarate, and malate catalyzed by succinyl-CoA synthetase, succinate dehydrogenase, fumarase, and malate dehydrogenase, respectively11. Notably, the carboxylic acids in the TCA cycle connect a larger metabolic networks11. For example, OAA, fumarate, and α-KG are involved in amino acid biosynthesis/degradation, ammonia assimilation and/or purine nucleotide metabolism/biosynthesis. Malate involves in the glyoxylate cycle and the formation of pyruvate. Moreover, the products of degrading citrate relate to the biosynthesis of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)12, isoprenoids, flavonoids and fatty acid extension13,14. In addition, OAA, one of the products of degrading citrate by ATP citrate lyase (ACL, EC4.1.3.8), can reenter the TCA cycle or be utilized for mono- or disaccharide synthesis through the gluconeogenesis pathway, which includes three key enzymes: glucose-6-phosphatase, fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase, EC 3.1.3.11), and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK, EC 4.1.1.49)11,15.
Acidity is important for the fruit’s organoleptic quality. In the citrus juice cell, acidity is generally dependent on citrate accumulation in the cell vacuole where the citrate contributes more than 90% of the total organic acids8. Citrate accumulation in the vacuole depends on the balance of citrate synthesis, membrane transport and degradation or utilization12,16. CS activity may not be responsible for the difference of acidity among citrus varieties17,18. However, a partial block of mitochondrial Aco (myt-Aco) activity (possibly by citramalate) is the prerequisite for citrate transport into the cell cytoplasm16,19. When citrate transports into the cytoplasm, vacuolar-type proton pumps play an important role in citrate uptake into the vacuole20,21,22. Also, some p-type proton pumps relate to citrate accumulation in the vacuole23,24. As the fruit ripens, vacuolar citrate fluxes into the cytoplasm possibly through citrate/H+ symporters25 and is utilized through the Aco-GABA and/or ACL-degradation pathway(s)10,12,26. Transcript analysis confirmed that the H+/citrate symporter CsCit125, the cytosolic Aco (cyt-Aco), cyt-IDH or NADP-IDH, glutamate decarboxylase (GAD, EC 4.1.1.15), and ACL participate in citrate catabolism as the fruit ripens12,16,26,27,28,29,30,31. Moreover, modifying the process of citrate biosynthesis to utilization can result in a metabolic shift towards amino acid or flavonoid biosynthesis28,32.
Because the reactions involved in carboxylic acid metabolism are the central point of the biosynthesis and/or catabolic networks of other metabolites, we hypothesized that the comprehensive variation in metabolites in ‘HAL’ compared with ‘AL’ should be tightly related to the changes in citrate metabolism. Hence, we compared the profiles of citrate accumulation-related genes and/or enzyme activities, as well as the metabolic fingerprinting between ‘HAL’ and ‘AL’ in the present study to elucidate the possible mechanism underlying the extensive metabolite changes in ‘HAL’. These results provide a scenario for this mutant and for the investigation of the network of metabolites involved in fruit quality.
Results
Differential metabolites between ‘AL’ and ‘HAL’
The high reproducibility of the total ion current of all samples indicated that the raw LC-MS data quality was reliable (Fig. S1). Using the optimized LC-MS analysis protocol and subsequent processes (i.e., raw data conversion, peak alignment and normalization, extraction of the peak m/z value, and retention time), we obtained 1645 features (one m/z value refers to one feature) under positive mode and 1388 features under negative mode. The relative standard deviation (RSD) frequency distributions of group ‘AL’ and group ‘HAL’ were primarily in the 0–30% range under either the positive mode or negative mode (Fig. S2), indicating that the sample deviation in each group was small and that the data quality was acceptable. The principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) confirmed that significant difference in metabolites exists between group ‘AL’ and group ‘HAL’ (Fig. S3). This PCA result explained 57.8% of the variation in the metabolic profiling (R2X=0.578) under positive mode (Fig. S3A) and 58.3% of the variation in the metabolic profiling (R2X=0.583) under negative mode (Fig. S3B). The PLS-DA model achieved a distinct separation between the metabolite fingerprinting of the groups ‘AL’ and ‘HAL’ with R2X=0.463, R2Y=0.994, and Q2=0.997 under positive mode (Fig. S3C) and R2X=0.459, R2Y=0.997, and Q2=0.983 under negative mode (Fig. S3D).
The volcano plot visually displayed many features that significantly differed between ‘AL’ and ‘HAL’ (Fig. S4). According to the screening criteria [the variable importance in the projection (VIP) >1 and p-value<0.01], we found 718 and 643 features showing significant difference between ‘AL’ and ‘HAL’ (Table S1) under positive and negative modes, respectively. However, we only identified 33 and 39 metabolites under the positive and negative modes, respectively, by searching the METLIN database (https://metlin.scripps.edu/) and the BGI-Tech local KEGG metabolite databases with the m/z values. The total number of identified metabolites was 68 (Table 1). We further classified these metabolites into seven groups: organic acids, sugars, amino acids and derivatives, purine or pyrimidine nucleosides and analogues, plant hormones and analogues, vitamins and derivatives, and anonymous group (Table 1). In the groups of organic acid and sugars, pyruvic acid, citric acid, oxoglutaric acid, isocitric acid, and hexose 1-phosphate had significantly lower levels in ‘HAL’ compared with ‘AL’; their levels in ‘HAL’ were approximately half or less of their levels in ‘AL’. Conversely, the succinic acid, fumaric acid, malic acid, citramalic acid, sucrose, sucrose 6-phosphate, D-glucose 6-phosphate, and 3-O-alpha-L-arabinopyranosyl-L-arabinose contents were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’. In particular, the succinic acid, sucrose, and 3-O-alpha-L-arabinopyranosyl-L-arabinose contents in ‘HAL’ were 2-fold higher than those in ‘AL’. In the amino acids and derivatives group, the L-lysine and histidinol phosphate levels were significantly lower in ‘HAL’ than in ‘AL’, whereas the histidine, serine, threonine, pyrroline hydroxycarboxylic acid, and phenylpyruvic acid levels were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than in ‘AL’. Notably, the L-lysine level in ‘HAL’ was less than one-tenth the level in ‘AL’, whereas the histidine level under negative mode and the pyrroline hydroxycarboxylic acid level under positive mode were more than 2- and 4-fold higher in ‘HAL’ than in ‘AL’, respectively. In the purine or pyrimidine nucleosides and analogues groups, all identified metabolites, including guanosine, deoxyinosine, uridine, uracil, and hypoxanthine, had significantly higher levels in ‘HAL’ compared with ‘AL’. Specifically, the levels of uridine and deoxyinosine were more than 6- and 28-fold higher in ‘HAL’ than in ‘AL’, respectively. In the plant hormones and analogues group, abscisic acid (ABA), abscisic alcohol 11-glucoside, and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) showed significantly lower levels in ‘HAL’ compared with ‘AL’, whereas the levels of zeatin analogues and dihomo-jasmonic acid were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than in ‘AL’. In the vitamins and derivatives group, four types of metabolites exhibited significant differences between the two cultivars. In them, the levels of ascorbic acid, L-ascorbic acid-2-glucoside, and niacin were nearly 2-fold higher in ‘HAL’ than in ‘AL’, whereas the riboflavin content in ‘HAL’ was less than half of the riboflavin content in ‘AL’. In addition, we clustered 32 identified metabolites into the anonymous group due to their complex or unclear functions. In them, 15 metabolites had significantly lower levels and 17 metabolites had significantly higher levels in ‘HAL’ compared with ‘AL’. The isopentenyl adenosine-5′-diphosphate, propyl cinnamate, and limonexic acid contents in ‘HAL’ were one-fourth or less of the contents in ‘AL’, whereas the levels of rhamnocitrin 3-(6′-acetylglucoside), methyl pentenoic acid, and cinnamic acid were increased by 3.5-fold and the octenoic acid level was increased by 20-fold in ‘HAL’ compared with ‘AL’.
Table 1
Classification | Putative Name | m/z | Retension time (min) | Fold change (M/W) | Detection mode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Organic acids | Pyruvic acid | 111.00535 | 1.028 | 0.24 | POSITIVE |
Citric acid | 193.03266 | 1.032 | 0.21 | POSITIVE | |
Citric acid | 191.02135 | 1.029 | 0.49 | NEGATIVE | |
Oxoglutaric acid | 147.02684 | 1.025 | 0.26 | POSITIVE | |
Isocitric acid | 191.02135 | 1.029 | 0.49 | NEGATIVE | |
Succinic acid | 117.02051 | 1.404 | 2.21 | NEGATIVE | |
Fumaric acid | 115.00441 | 0.923 | 1.34 | NEGATIVE | |
Malic acid | 133.01496 | 0.925 | 1.32 | NEGATIVE | |
Citramalic acid | 147.03118 | 1.410 | 1.24 | NEGATIVE | |
Sugars | Hexose 1-phosphate | 241.0117 | 0.726 | 0.43 | POSITIVE |
D-Glucose 6-phosphate | 259.0243 | 0.730 | 1.43 | NEGATIVE | |
Sucrose 6-phosphate | 423.08989 | 5.560 | 1.67 | NEGATIVE | |
3-O-alpha-L-Arabinopyranosyl-L-arabinose | 845.27875 | 0.839 | 2.31 | NEGATIVE | |
Sucrose | 342.10781 | 2.830 | 2.59 | NEGATIVE | |
Amino acids and derivatives | L-Lysine | 147.11607 | 8.394 | 0.07 | POSITIVE |
Histidinol phosphate | 222.06526 | 6.738 | 0.56 | POSITIVE | |
Threonine | 118.05209 | 0.786 | 1.45 | NEGATIVE | |
Serine | 104.03656 | 0.774 | 1.52 | NEGATIVE | |
Pyrroline hydroxycarboxylic acid | 130.0496 | 1.207 | 1.66 | NEGATIVE | |
Phenylpyruvic acid | 165.05436 | 5.136 | 1.79 | POSITIVE | |
Histidine | 154.06336 | 0.752 | 2.07 | NEGATIVE | |
Pyrroline hydroxycarboxylic acid | 128.03637 | 1.220 | 4.51 | POSITIVE | |
Purine or pyrimidine nucleosides and analogues | Uracil | 113.0344 | 1.207 | 1.41 | POSITIVE |
Uridine | 245.07651 | 1.210 | 1.44 | POSITIVE | |
Guanosine | 284.09683 | 1.048 | 1.56 | POSITIVE | |
Hypoxanthine | 135.03158 | 0.810 | 1.75 | NEGATIVE | |
Uridine | 243.06432 | 1.222 | 6.08 | NEGATIVE | |
Deoxyinosine | 251.07958 | 0.995 | 28.27 | NEGATIVE | |
Plant hormones and analogues | Abscisic Acid | 265.1434 | 7.746 | 0.46 | POSITIVE |
Abscisic Acid | 263.13068 | 7.746 | 0.48 | NEGATIVE | |
Abscisic alcohol 11-glucoside | 411.20525 | 8.60 | 0.51 | NEGATIVE | |
Methyl jasmonate | 223.13491 | 7.394 | 0.67 | NEGATIVE | |
trans-Zeatin/Pantothenic Acid | 220.11792 | 2.998 | 1.32 | POSITIVE | |
trans-Zeatin/Pantothenic Acid | 218.10499 | 2.994 | 1.45 | NEGATIVE | |
Cis-zeatin-O-glucoside | 380.15868 | 3.28 | 1.68 | NEGATIVE | |
dihomo-jasmonic acid | 237.15145 | 8.615 | 1.83 | NEGATIVE | |
Vitamins and derivatives | Ascorbic acid | 175.02559 | 0.933 | 1.90 | NEGATIVE |
L-Ascorbic acid-2-glucoside | 337.08065 | 0.908 | 1.99 | NEGATIVE | |
Niacin | 124.03601 | 1.041 | 1.76 | POSITIVE | |
Riboflavin | 375.13283 | 5.17 | 0.48 | NEGATIVE | |
Anonymous group | Isopentenyl adenosine-5′-diphosphate | 494.09674 | 7.45 | 0.24 | NEGATIVE |
Propyl cinnamate | 191.10609 | 3.185 | 0.25 | POSITIVE | |
Limonexic acid | 503.19124 | 7.487 | 0.25 | POSITIVE | |
alpha-Methylstyrene | 119.0854 | 7.390 | 0.42 | POSITIVE | |
Inositol cyclic phosphate | 241.0117 | 0.726 | 0.43 | NEGATIVE | |
Ambolic acid | 471.38581 | 0.674 | 0.45 | POSITIVE | |
Ethylphenol/Dimethylphenol | 123.08023 | 7.392 | 0.45 | POSITIVE | |
Nicotinate D-ribonucleoside | 256.07836 | 7.393 | 0.46 | POSITIVE | |
Pyridoxamine-5′-Phosphate | 249.0607 | 7.390 | 0.49 | POSITIVE | |
L-Citronellol glucoside | 317.19884 | 7.044 | 0.50 | NEGATIVE | |
Furoic acid | 111.00918 | 1.029 | 0.52 | NEGATIVE | |
Ubiquinone-1 | 251.12784 | 7.057 | 0.54 | POSITIVE | |
Propylphenol | 137.09579 | 6.738 | 0.58 | POSITIVE | |
Viburtinal | 161.05945 | 4.972 | 0.63 | POSITIVE | |
S-Adenosyl-4-methylthio-2-oxobutanoate | 398.1069 | 8.901 | 0.65 | POSITIVE | |
p-Nitroglutethimide | 261.08979 | 5.377 | 1.34 | NEGATIVE | |
N-Methylethanolamine phosphate | 156.03971 | 0.700 | 1.44 | POSITIVE | |
Citraconic acid | 129.02042 | 1.045 | 1.48 | NEGATIVE | |
Ascorbalamic acid | 262.0594 | 0.826 | 1.48 | NEGATIVE | |
p-Coumaroyl quinic acid | 339.10751 | 7.303 | 1.56 | POSITIVE | |
Caffeic acid 3-O-glucuronide | 355.06987 | 3.773 | 1.61 | NEGATIVE | |
Ethyl (S)-3-hydroxybutyrate glucoside | 293.1259 | 5.013 | 1.62 | NEGATIVE | |
1-Linoleoylglycerophosphocholine | 520.33997 | 11.871 | 1.77 | POSITIVE | |
Glucocaffeic acid | 341.09185 | 4.189 | 1.88 | NEGATIVE | |
Phenprocoumon | 279.11064 | 3.206 | 1.98 | NEGATIVE | |
DHAP(8:0) | 295.09632 | 1.470 | 2.53 | NEGATIVE | |
Biocytin | 104.03656 | 0.774 | 2.68 | NEGATIVE | |
Limocitrin 3-rutinoside | 655.19317 | 8.047 | 2.69 | POSITIVE | |
Rhamnocitrin 3-(6′-acetylglucoside) | 505.1321 | 7.805 | 3.53 | POSITIVE | |
Methyl pentenoic acid | 115.07536 | 4.405 | 3.88 | POSITIVE | |
Cinnamic acid | 149.05952 | 4.721 | 5.72 | POSITIVE | |
Octenoic acid | 143.10642 | 8.313 | 20.31 | POSITIVE |
Comparative analysis of citrate biosynthesis-related enzymes
CS catalyzes the condensation of acetyl-CoA and OAA to form citrate and PEPC catalyzes the β-carboxylation of phosphoenolpyruvate to produce OAA. CS is directly responsible for citrate synthesis, whereas PEPC has been suggested to influence citrate biosynthesis33. Although one PEPC gene and one CS gene were previously cloned from citrus17,18,33, we further screened the citrus genome databases and the PCR confirmation indicated that there were at least three PEPC and two CS gene members in the current citrus genome databases (Table S2, Fig. S5A,B). Then, we analyzed their expression levels in both the ‘AL’ and ‘HAL’ fruit juice sacs at 235 days after florescence (DAF) (Fig. 1a,b). The PEPC1 and PEPC2 transcript levels were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’, whereas the PEPC3 transcript level in ‘HAL’ was markedly lower than that in ‘AL’ (Fig. 1a). In contrast to the three PEPC genes, the transcript levels of the two CS genes were both significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ (Fig. 1b). We further analyzed their enzyme activities and found that the PEPC (Fig. 1a1) and CS (Fig. 1b1) activities were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’.
Comparative analysis of citrate transport-related genes
The expression profiles of the genes encoding vacuolar H+-ATPase (VHA), the vacuolar H+-PPase (VHP), CsPH8 encoding the P-type proton pump23 and CsCit125 were compared between ‘AL’ and ‘HAL’ (Fig. 2).
VHA consists of a peripheral V1 domain and a membrane-integral V0 domain. VHA contains 13 subunits (VHA-A, VHA-B, VHA-C, VHA-D, VHA-E, VHA-F, VHA-G, and VHA-H for the V1 domain and VHA-a, VHA-c, VHA-c”, VHA-d, and VHA-e for the V0 domain); moreover, there is an assembly factor (af) for VHA assembly34. Through screening the citrus genome databases and PCR confirmation, we found at least one gene encoding af, VHA-A, B, C, D, G, c”, d, and e, two genes encoding VHA-E, F, H, and a, and four genes encoding VHA-c (Table S2, Fig. S5F–H). Transcript analysis indicated that the VHA-af transcript level of ‘HAL’ was half that of ‘AL’ (Fig. 2a). Moreover, the transcript levels of some genes (i.e., VHA-D, VHA-H2, VHA-c4, VHA-d, and VHA-e) were extremely or significantly lower, whereas the transcript levels of VHA-H1, VHA-c1, and VHA-c3 were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’. Additionally, the transcript levels of other genes encoding the VHA V1 and V0 domains showed no significant difference between the two cultivars (Fig. 2a,b). VHP is another V-type proton pump35. Inquiry of the citrus genome and PCR confirmation indicated the presence of at least four genes (VHP1-4) encoding VHP (Table S1 and Fig. S5I). Transcript analysis showed that the transcript levels of VHP1-4 were significantly lower in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ (Fig. 2c). Similar to VHP1-4, the CsPH8 transcript level was also significantly lower in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’. However, the CsCit1 transcript level had no significant difference between ‘HAL’ and ‘AL’ (Fig. 2d).
Comparative analysis of citrate degradation- or utilization-related genes and/or enzyme activities
Citrate participates in the TCA cycle primarily for energy metabolism in the mitochondria11. In the cell cytoplasm, citrate can use for amino acid or GABA biosynthesis through the production of glutamate12,28, for the biosynthesis of many secondary metabolites and for gluconeogenesis through the ACL-degradation pathway10,13,26,36.
Aco, IDH, GS and GAD are the key enzymes involved in citrate catabolism through the Aco-GABA pathway (Fig. 3). A previous study indicated that three genes (Aco1, Aco2 and Aco3) encode Aco in the citrus genome29. Here, transcript analysis showed that the Aco1 transcript level in ‘HAL’ was slightly higher than that of ‘AL’ and the Aco2 and Aco3 transcript levels were more than six-fold higher in ‘HAL’ than in ‘AL’ (Fig. 3a). Enzyme activity analysis showed that the mit-Aco activity was significantly lower (Fig. 3a1) and the cyt-Aco activity was significantly higher (Fig. 3a2) in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’. IDH is the second key enzyme involved in citrate catabolism. One gene encoding cyt-IDH or NADP-IDH was cloned from citrus by Sadka et al.30. In this study, inquiry of the citrus genome databases and PCR confirmation showed that at least three NAD-IDH (mitochondrial type) and NADP-IDH (cytoplasmic type) genes exist in the citrus genome (Table S1 and Fig. S5C,D). Transcript analysis indicated that the transcript levels of the three NAD-IDH genes (Fig. 3b) and two NADP-IDH genes (NADP-IDH1 and NADP-IDH3, Fig. 3c) were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’. Moreover, the enzyme activity analysis showed that the activities of myt-IDH (Fig. 3bb1)1) and cyt-IDH (Fig. 3cc1)1) were both significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’. GS and GAD are two enzymes that catalyze glutamate in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3). Three genes (GS1-3) encoding GS were confirmed in the citrus genome (Table S1 and Fig. S5B) and two genes (GAD1-2) were previously confirmed by Liu et al.31. Transcript analysis indicated that the transcript levels of GS2 (Fig. 3d), GS3 (Fig. 3d) and GAD2 (Fig. 3e) were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’. Differently, the GS1 transcript level was similar between ‘HAL’ and ‘AL’ (Fig. 3d) and the GAD1 transcript level was significantly lower in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ (Fig. 3e). Furthermore, the enzyme activities of GS and GAD showed similar levels between ‘HAL’ and ‘AL’ (Fig. 3d,e).
ACL catalyzes the cleavage of citrate to yield acetyl-CoA and OAA, which involve in the biosynthesis of many secondary metabolites or gluconeogenesis (Fig. 3). Three ACL genes have been confirmed in the citrus genome26. Here, transcript analysis showed that the transcript levels of ACLα1, ACLα2 and ACLβ were more four-fold higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ (Fig. 3f). Moreover, the ACL enzyme activity in ‘HAL’ was significantly higher than that in ‘AL’ (Fig. 3f1).
The PEPCK and FBPase are the key enzymes involving in gluconeogenesis11,15. The sequence inquiry and PCR confirmation indicated that at least two genes encoding PEPCK and FBPase exist in the citrus genome (Table S1, Fig. S5A,E). The PEPCK1 transcript level was significantly lower and the PEPCK2 transcript level was significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ (Fig. 3g). Differently from the PEPCK genes, the transcript levels of the FBPase1 and FBPase2 genes were both significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ (Fig. 3h).
Discussion
‘HAL’ is a bud mutant of the ‘AL’ sweet orange1. It is characterized by a comprehensive alteration in metabolites, such as the lycopene, the soluble sugars (sucrose, fructose and glucose), the organic acids and other secondary metabolites1,2,4. To help investigating the possible reason for the comprehensive change, we analyzed the metabolites in the fruits of the two cultivars at 242 DAF by using LC-Q/TOF-MS technique in the present study. Although we found more than 600 features showing significant difference between the two cultivars under the current analysis conditions (Table S1), only approximately one-tenth of the different features were identified (Table 1). Nevertheless, the profiles of differently identified metabolites between the two cultivars were almost consistent with the report of Pan et al.2, implying that the data is believable.
As the carboxylic acid metabolism is the central point of the biosynthesis and/or catabolic networks of other metabolites, we further assessed the significance of citrate metabolism in the comprehensive metabolite alterations in ‘HAL’. Clearly, citrate is significantly lower in the juice sacs of ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ during fruit development and ripening1,4, which was further confirmed in the present study (Table 1). However, we found that the transcript levels of citrate biosynthesis-related genes (CS1, CS2, PEPC1, PEPC2) and the enzyme activities of CS and PEPC were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ (Fig. 1), indicating that ‘HAL’ has an increased citrate biosynthesis ability compared with ‘AL’. Thus, we can deny the hypothesis that the low accumulation of citrate in ‘HAL’ is possibly due to the reduction of citrate biosynthesis.
It is well known that a partial block of myt-Aco activity is a prerequisite for citrate transport into the cell cytoplasm16,19. Bogin and Wallace19 first suggested that the citramalate was possibly the inhibitor of myt-Aco. Degu et al.28 found that spraying citramalate did inhibit Aco activity and increased citrate accumulation in citrus fruit juice sacs. Consistent with the study of Pan et al.2, we found that the citramalate or citramalic acid content was significantly higher (1.24-fold) in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ (Table 1), moreover, the myt-Aco activity was significantly lower in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ (Fig. 3a1). These results implied that more citrate in the mitochondrion transports into the cytoplasm in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’.
When citrate transports into the cytoplasm, it should utilize immediately or store quickly in the vacuole to keep the cytoplasm neutral for cell activity15,37. The uptake of citrate into the vacuole depends on the activity of the proton pumps21,22 and the utilization of citrate depends on the activities of enzymes involved in Aco-GABA pathway12 and/or ACL-pathway26. Here, we found that some key VHA genes (Fig. 2a,b) [e.g., the VHA assembly factor gene (VHA-af), all the VHP genes (Fig. 2c), and the juice sac-predominant p-type proton pump gene (CsPH8)23] showed significantly lower expression levels in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’. On the other hand, the activities of cyt-Aco and NADP-IDH in the Aco-GABA pathway and ACL in the ACL-degradation pathway were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ (Fig. 3). These results indicated that in the ‘HAL’, more citrate does not accumulate in the vacuole but utilizes in the cytoplasm because the lower expression levels of proton pump genes reduce the ability of the proton pump to uptake citrate into the vacuole. Moreover, the higher enzyme activities of cyt-Aco, NADP-IDH and ACL increase the ability to utilize citrate.
The TCA cycle is very important for organisms by generating energy and providing various precursors for other biochemical reactions11. The present study showed that the citramalate content increased significantly (Table 1) and the myt-Aco activity reduced clearly (Fig. 3a1), suggesting that the TCA cycle should be seriously blocked in ‘HAL’ compared with ‘AL’. However, we also found that the cyt-Aco (Fig. 3a2) and NADP-IDH (Fig. 3c1) activities increased significantly in ‘HAL’ compared with ‘AL’ and the activities of GS (Fig. 3d1) and GAD (Fig. 3e1) of which both enzymes catalyze glutamate showed similar levels between ‘HAL’ and ‘AL’. These results suggested that the direct products (isocitrate and α-KG) of cyt-Aco and NADP-IDH should be significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’. Nevertheless, they decreased significantly in ‘HAL’ compared with ‘AL’ (Table 1). Therefore, we inferred that more cytoplastic isocitrate and α-KG in ‘HAL’ import into the mitochondrion and participate in the TCA cycle again. The compensation of isocitrate and α-KG from the catalysis of cytoplastic citrate by cyt-Aco and NADP-IDH contributes to the stability of the TCA cycle in ‘HAL’.
Another cytoplastic citrate-degrading pathway is through ACL catalysis, which links the production of many secondary metabolites13,36. For example, Crifò et al.32 suggested that citrate could utilize for flavonoid biosynthesis through ACL catalysis in blood oranges under cold storage. In the present study, the ACL gene transcript levels (Fig. 3f) and enzyme activity (Fig. 3f1) were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’. These findings indicated that ACL is more active in the low-acid orange ‘HAL’ than in the normal-acid orange ‘AL’, implying that more citrate is cleaved to produce more OAA and acetyl-CoA. OAA can reenter into the mitochondrion for citrate biosynthesis or use for gluconeogenesis or amino acid biosynthesis11,15. Here, we found that the transcript levels of three key genes [PEPCK2 (Fig. 3b), FBPase1 and FBPase2 (Fig. 3h)] involving in gluconeogenesis, the intermediate sugar (Glu-6P) and the soluble sugar (Suc, Glu, and Fru) contents were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than in ‘AL’ (Table 1). These results indicated the OAA from the catalysis of cytoplastic citrate by ACL participates in the gluconeogenesis, which at least accounts partially for the significant increase of the soluble sugars in ‘HAL’. Judging from the Fig. 4, the significant increase of Glu-6P at least contributes partially to the significantly increase of ascorbic acid, histidine (His), pyrimidine or purine in ‘HAL’ compared with ‘AL’ (Table 1). In addition, the contents of serine, glycine and tryptophan were significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ (Table 1), which is possibly related to the participation of OAA or pyruvate (Fig. 4). On the other hand, another product of acetyl-CoA via ACL catalysis usually utilizes for fatty acid extension or the biosynthesis of isoprenoids and other secondary metabolites13,32,36, including the biosynthesis of lysine (Lys), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), zeatin, lycopene or ABA (Fig. 4). The present study showed that the content of zeatin was significantly higher but the contents of Lys, MeJA and ABA were significantly lower in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ (Table 1), consistent with the previous study of Pan et al.2. In addition, we are also sure that lycopene is significantly higher in ‘HAL’ than ‘AL’ because lycopene can be visibly found in ‘HAL’ (Fig. S6) and has been detected by HPLC at a significant level in ‘HAL’1,4. In this study, consistent with a previous metabolomics analysis 2, we failed to identify lycopene in ‘HAL’ possibly due to the lack of a standard reference database for citrus fruits or just using a colomn C18 not a C30 in the LC-MS analysis. Furthermore, we believe that there should have more significantly altered secondary metabolites in ‘HAL’ because 90% of the differential features failed identification in this study (Table S1 and Table 1). This failure is largely due to our basic lack of knowledge of many metabolic pathways in plants and our current inability to identify the majority of metabolites synthesized in the citrus plant.
Taken together, this study confirmed that the orange mutant ‘HAL’ has a comprehensive alteration in metabolites except for the increase in lycopene and soluble sugars and the decrease in citrate. Combining the present and previous results1,2,3,4,6, we established a model to explain the comprehensive alteration in metabolites in the orange mutant ‘HAL’ (Fig. 4). In detail, although the citrate content is very low in ‘HAL’ juice sacs, ‘HAL’ still has higher ability to biosynthesize the citrate comprared with ‘AL’. Moreover, the citramalate content (the inhibitor of mit-Aco) increases significantly and the mit-Aco activity decreases significantly in ‘HAL’, resulting in more synthesized citrate exports into the cytoplasm. Because the transcript levels of some key genes of proton pump decreases significantly in ‘HAL’ compared with ‘AL’, which reduces the ability for the uptake of citrate into the vacuole, more citrate cannot store in the vacuole. The abundant citrate utilize immediately because the activities of cys-Aco, NADP-IDH and ACL increase significantly in the ‘HAL’ compared with the ‘AL’, which keeps the cytoplasmic pH constant. Some citrate-splitting products possibly reenter the mitochondrion to maintain the stability of the TCA cycle rather than participate in the biosynthesis of GABA or glutamine. The others utilize for gluconeogenesis and/or secondary metabolite metabolism, which results in a significant increase in the soluble sugars, ascorbic acid, histidine, pyrimidine, purine, zeatin, and lycopene or a significant decrease in methyl jasmonate and ABA (Fig. 4).
Frankly, the model gives a rough but reasonable explanation for the comprehensive change in metabolites of ‘HAL’ compared with its wild type, ‘AL’. In the model, the decrease of proton pump genes’ expression, namely, the reduction of proton pump ability to promote the citrate storing in the vacuole plays a pivotal role for the comprehensive alteration in metabolites of ‘HAL’. Although the lower ABA content in the ‘HAL’ compared with ‘AL’ is possibly due to the higher accumulation of lycopene in ‘HAL’, which always reduces ABA biosynthesis1,38, there is a long way to verify this model in the future because of the complexity in the secondary metabolism and the difficulty for gene function identification of perennial plants.
Methods
Plant materials and sample preparation
The ‘Anliu’ sweet orange (AL, Citrus sinensis cv. Anliu) and its mutant ‘Hong Anliu’ (HAL, C. sinensis cv. Hong Anliu) grafted onto the same rootstock (trifoliate orange as base rootstock and Satsuma mandarin as middle rootstock) at the citrus germplasm orchard in Huazhong Agricultural University (Hubei province, China) were used in the present study (Fig. S6). We collected ten nearly uniform fruits of each cultivar randomly at 235 DAF for the gene expression and enzyme activity analyses. Because the metabolite response occurs later than the gene reaction, we collected another ten fruits collected at 242 DAF (seven-day interval) for the metabolite analysis. The fruit segments were separated immediately, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C prior to use.
LC-MS analysis
Ten fruits (n=10) of ‘AL’ and ‘HAL’, respectively at 242 DAF were sent to BGI TechSolutions Co., Ltd. (BGI-Tech, Shenzhen, China) for metabolite analysis. One segment was randomly selected from each fruit and ground into powder in liquid nitrogen. The powder was ultrasonically oscillated with 800μL of solvent (acetonitrile:water=7:3) for 20minutes. A total of 300μL of homogenate was transferred into a clean Eppendorf tube and centrifuged for 10min at 12,000×g and 4°C. A total of 100μL of the supernatant was used for the sample injection.
The detection instrument was the LC-Q/TOF-MS (Agilent, 1290 Infinity LC, 6530 UHD and Accurate-Mass Q-TOF/MS) with a C18 chromatographic column (Agilent, 100mm×2.1mm, 1.8μm). The separation conditions were as follows: column temperature, 40°C; flow rate, 0.35mL/min; pressure limit, 800 bar; mobile phase A, 0.1% formic acid in water (v/v); mobile phase B, 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (v/v); and injection volume and temperature, 4μL and 4°C. The elution gradient was 5% mobile phase B at 0 and 1min, 20% at 6min, 50% at 9min, and 95% at 13 and 15min.
Sample analysis performed under the positive and negative ion modes and their mass parameters showed in Table S3. Nitrogen was as the cone or desolvation gas. The ion scan time was 0.03 s with a scan interval of 0.02s. The mass scanning range was 50–1000m/z. The data were processed with the standard procedure39,40.
Real-time PCR expression analysis
Total RNAs of the fruit segment samples at 235 DAF were isolated from with the RNAprep Pure Plan Kit (TIANGEN BIOTECH CO., LTD., Beijing, China) according to the manual protocol. One μg of high-quality total RNA was used for first-strand cDNA synthesis using the PrimeScript RT Reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, DALIAN, China). The citrate-accumulated genes used here included three PEPCs, two CSs, one CsCit125, three Acos29, three NAD-IDHs, three NADP-IDHs, three glutamine synthetases (EC 6.3.1.2) (GSs), two GADs31, three ACLs26, one p-type proton pump gene (CsPH8)23, twenty-four V-type proton pumps, and an assembly factor (af) for vacuolar H+-ATPase (VHA) assembly (VHA-af). Moreover, two PEPCKs and FBPases involved in gluconeogenesis were included. Their sequences were identified from the citrus genome databases (citrus.hzau.edu.cn/orange/and phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html) followed by PCR confirmation or referenced from other studies (Table 2, Table S2 and Fig. S5). The authenticity of the sequences from the citrus genome databases confirmed by PCR amplification using ‘AL’ fruit cDNA as the template prior to primer design for the quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Primers specific for the targeted genes and the actin gene were designed with Primer 3.041 and listed in Table 2 or Table S2. The qRT-PCR performed in a 10-μL reaction volume using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa, DALIAN, China) on a LightCycler 480 Real-Time System according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The qRT-PCR carried out for three biological replicates. The reactions started with an initial incubation at 50°C for 2min, followed by 95°C for 10min and 40 cycles of 95°C for 15s and 60°C for 60s. The Livak method42 was employed to calculate the relative gene expression level.
Table 2
Category | Gene Name | Description | Sequence (5′-3′) | Sequence ID* or reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forward primer | Reverse primer | ||||
Citrate synthesis-related | PEPC1 | phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase | GTGCGATCCCGTCTATCTGT | AAGGCTCAAGGCCACTTTTT | orange1.1g002089m |
PEPC2 | GGCATGCAAAACACTGGTTA | CATGTTCATTACGGCTTGGA | orange1.1g002112m | ||
PEPC3 | GAACAATGACGGACACAACG | TGGACTCGCTTCCAACTTCT | orange1.1g001537m | ||
CS1 | citrate synthase | GGTGCCCCCAATATTAACAA | AGAGCTCGGTCCCATATCAA | orange1.1g012107m | |
CS2 | ACTGGTGTATGGATGCGACA | TCTTCGTCTTGTGGCATTTG | orange1.1g010304m | ||
Citrate degradation or utilization-related | Aco1 | aconitase | GGCAAGTCATTCACATGCGTT | TGAAGAAGTAGACCCCGGTTGA | Terol et al.29 |
Aco2 | GGCAATGATGAAGTGATGGCT | GTTGGAACATGGACCGTCTTT | |||
Aco3 | TGCAGCAATGAGGTACAAGGC | TCACACCCAGAAGCATTGGAC | |||
ACLα1 | ATP-citrate α subunit | GATACTGTTGGAGACTTGGG | GCTCTCTTACGACCATCAGG | Hu et al.26 | |
ACLα2 | TACAGTGGAGCACCCAACGA | CCTTCAGGGCTTGGATTATG | |||
ACLβ | ATP-citrate β subunit | GAGGAGATAACAGAGACAAA | AACAAAGAGCCCATTCAGAT | ||
NAD-IDH1 | NAD-isocitrate dehydrogenase | TATTGCTGGAGGCACTGGTG | ACTTCCCCTCTGCAATTGTG | orange1.1g018224 | |
NAD-IDH2 | CAGCACCTGATATTGCTGGA | CTCTGCAATTGTGCTCAGGA | Ciclev10025889m | ||
NAD-IDH3 | AGCAGGAAACGTGGGTAATG | GGCAGCAATAACAGCATCAA | orange1.1g017413 | ||
NADP-IDH1 | NADP-isocitrate dehydrogenase | GAAAATTGGGGATTGGGATT | CAACAGAGGTGCAGCTCAAA | orange1.1g015012 | |
NADP-IDH2 | CAGCGGACATGTGAACAATC | CCGTCCATTTCAACGATAGG | Ciclev10005058 | ||
NADP-IDH3 | TACCGGGTTCATCAGAAAGG | AGGCTGCTTCCAGTTTCTCA | orange1.1g009041 | ||
GS1 | glutamine synthetase | CATCAATGCTATCGCGTGTT | TCTGCATTCTTGGCAGGTTA | orange1.1g013478m | |
GS2 | TTTGGGATGCTCAGTTGTGA | CTGAATGGCTCCCAAAAATG | orange1.1g018391m | ||
GS3 | TCAGGATTCACGAGTTCACG | AGCAAAGAACCCACTGTTGC | orange1.1g018434m | ||
GAD1 | glutamate decarboxylase | CACCAAAAAGAATGAGGAGACC | CCGTACTTGTGACCACTGACAT | Liu et al.31 | |
GAD2 | ACCGCAATGTGATGGAGAA | GAATTCATCGTGGCGTTTG | |||
PEPCK1 | phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase | GGCTACCGAGAATCCAAACA | GTGCTGGGTGTCGATCTCTT | orange1.1g005865m | |
PEPCK2 | GGCTAGCGAAGATTCAAACG | GTCCCTTTAATGGGGGTGTT | orange1.1g006486m | ||
FBPase1 | fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase | TGGAAAGCTGAGGCTCTTGT | ACTTCCTCCTGGCTTCCAAT | orange1.1g015111m | |
FBPase2 | TCCCATTTCTGATCAACTTTCC | GCTGAGGAGCAGGCTTTTTA | orange1.1g019437m | ||
Citrate transported-related | CsCit1 | H+/citrate symporter | GTCTCCGTAACAGGCATTGG | ACCACTAAGGGAAGCGTTCA | Shimada et al.25 |
CsPH8 | p-type proton pump | CCGTGAAGGAATTGATTTGG | CCATGACAATGGATTCCACA | Shi et al.23 | |
VHA-af | VHA assembly factor | CAGTGCTACTGAACCCTTCTCCTC | ATGCTCTGAATGCTAAATACCCAA | orange1.1g028366m | |
VHA-A | V-type ATPase A subunit | GATGCCCTTTTCCCTTCAGT | TTTCATTTCCTCGCTCCCCA | Ciclev10030969m | |
VHA-B | V-type ATPase B subunit | TCAATGTCCTTCCGTCCCTA | TTCTTCTCCGACCACAGCCT | orange1.1g011329m | |
VHA-C | V-type ATPase C subunit | AAACATTCATTTGACACTCCTCTT | AACTACTCTCTATGCCTGATACCC | Ciclev10015638m | |
VHA-D | V-type ATPase D subunit | ATTCTTCCTTTGCCCTGATTG | TTTCACATAAGCAGCACGACA | Ciclev10009240m | |
VHA-E1 | V-type ATPase E subunit | CCGTACCGTCTGTCTTTCCTT | ACATCAGCGTCGTTCATTTTC | orange1.1g027450m | |
VHA-E2 | AAGAGTGCTGATTCTCACGAACC | CGAGCAAGAAGGTTCGTGAG | Cs6g10330.1 | ||
VHA-F1 | V-type ATPase F subunit | ATGGCTGGCAGAGCTCAAAT | CATCTTCAATTGCTTTCACCGTAG | Ciclev10002833m | |
VHA-F2 | GCTTGCTGGAGTTGGGAATG | GCAGGGATCGGCTTGTTATG | Ciclev10022651m | ||
VHA-G | V-type ATPase G subunit | GACTGAGGCAAGCCAAAGAAGA | AGCCCCAGCATTAAGATGATGA | Cs6g11650.2 | |
VHA-H1 | V-type ATPase H subunit | CTGTCGCTTGCTTTGATTTGTC | AACCTCGGTATTCTCATGGTTC | orange1.1g034108m | |
VHA-H2 | CAGTGGAGTACTTGGCAACTA | TCCTTCAAACCTTCTTCCAGTTG | Cs7g14520.1 | ||
VHA-a1 | V-type ATPase a subunit | TGGTAAGAAGAGAGAAGGCTGTAT | CTTGCGAGTTGCTATCAAATGT | orange1.1g003454m | |
VHA-a2 | AAAAGTGTCTTGTGGGTGAGGG | GCGAAAATAGGTAGGCGGAG | Cs8g08330.1 | ||
VHA-c1 | V-type ATPase c subunit | CGCCCTTGTCTTCTCCTGTAT | GACTTGGCCTTGGGGTTAATC | Cs8g07570.1 | |
VHA-c2 | TAACGCACAGCAGCCTAAGTTG | GATGAGAGGATGATTCCCACGA | orange1.1g031149m | ||
VHA-c3 | GTATGGGACGGCGAAGAGTG | CAAGCGAGACCCGAAGACAA | Cs1g25080.1 | ||
VHA-c4 | GTACCGGAATTAACCCTAAGGC | CCAGCGGAGAGACCAGCAAG | Ciclev10002781m | ||
VHA-c” | V-type ATPase c” subunit | TCACCATATACCTTCTCCGCC | ATAATTGCAACAATGACCCCA | Cs4g20460.1 | |
VHA-d | V-type ATPase d subunit | CTTGGAGGCGATCGTGAGG | TACGACGATCATCTCGGGTG | orange1.1g018709m | |
VHA-e | V-type ATPase e subunit | ATGGGGTTTTTGGTGACA | TCACTCCTCTTCACTCAG | Ciclev10010112m | |
VHP1 | V-type Ppase | CGAGCAGCAACAGCGACAAGA | CCACAGACCCCAGGAAAACGA | Ciclev10024946m | |
VHP2 | TGAGCCACAGAATCAGAGAGAGAA | GCACCAACAATCAAACCAATAAAC | Ciclev10007524m | ||
VHP3 | CCCTGCACATACAACACAG | TGCTGACTCCTTTCCTTGCT | orange1.1g040141m | ||
VHP4 | GTTGTGTCTTGGGGTGGTCTTT | GCCTTCAGCTCCATCTCGTATT | orange1.1g003697m | ||
Actin | Actin | CCGACCGTATGAGCAAGGAAA | TTCCTGTGGACAATGGATGGA | Liu et al.1 |
Enzyme activity determination
The determination of each enzyme activity performed in triplicate. The activities of CS, cyt- and myt-ACO, and cyt- and myt-IDH were assayed with the methods reported by Luo et al.43 and Hirai and Ueno44. The ACL activity was analyzed with the method described by Hu et al.26, and the GAD activity was assayed with the method described by Liu et al.31.
Glutamine synthetase (GS, EC 6.3.1.2) activity was assayed with the method described by Kaiser and Lewis45 with modifications. Two grams of sample were ground into powder with liquid nitrogen. Then, the powder was homogenized with 4ml of cold extraction buffer (0.1mM phosphate buffer containing 1mM EDTA, 2mM dithiothreitol and 8% insoluble polyvinylpyrrolidone), incubated on ice for 10min, and centrifuged at 12,000×g for 15min at 4°C. The supernatant stored at 0–4°C and used as the crude enzyme solution. The enzyme assay was the same as that described by Kaiser and Lewis45, and the absorbance was measured at 540nm.
Data processing and statistics
Similar with other reports2,46, the LC-MS raw data were initially converted into the netCDF format and then processed by the XCMS toolbox (http://metlin.scripps.edu/xcms/)47. After m/z data normalization, the data quality was evaluated by calculating the relative standard deviation (RSD) and drawing the RSD histogram. The data was pre-processed by both mean-centering and variance-scaling prior to multivariate analysis. Then, the resulting scaled datasets were imported into simca-p software (Version 12.0, Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) and the unsupervised PCA and supervised PLS-DA were carried out to test the difference of metabolomic data between groups of ‘AL’ and ‘HAL’. The significantly different features were screened out with the combination of VIP value (>1) from PLS-DA and the p value (<0.01) from a two-tailed Student’s t-test. The differential m/z candidates were putatively identified through searching the online Metlin database (metlin.scripps.edu/)48 and the local KEGG databases (version 59, BGI TechSolutions Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China).
On the other hand, the significant difference of gene expression or enzyme activity between ‘AL’ and ‘HAL’ at 235 DAF was evaluated with Student’s t test in the ANOVA program of SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Difference was considered significant at P<0.05.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Guo, L.-X. et al. Citrate Accumulation-Related Gene Expression and/or Enzyme Activity Analysis Combined With Metabolomics Provide a Novel Insight for an Orange Mutant. Sci. Rep. 6, 29343; 10.1038/srep29343 (2016).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31372012), the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-27), and Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation (No. ZRY0116).
Footnotes
Author Contributions L.-X.G. and C.-Y.S. carried out the experiments and data analysis, as well wrote the draft manuscript. X.L., D.-Y.N., L.-F.J. and H.Y. help doing this study. Y.-Z.L. designed and supervised the study, as well polished the manuscript.
References
- Liu Q. et al.. A novel bud mutation that confers abnormal patterns of lycopene accumulation in sweet orange fruit (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck). J Exp Bot 58, 4161–4171 (2007). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Pan Z., Li Y., Deng X. & Xiao S. Non-targeted metabolomic analysis of orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck) wild type and bud mutant fruits by direct analysis in real-time and HPLC-electrospray mass spectrometry. Metabolomics 10, 508–523 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- Yu K. et al.. Transcriptome changes during fruit development and ripening of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis). BMC Genomics 13, 10 (2012). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Q. et al.. Comparative transcripts profiling reveals new insight into molecular processes regulating lycopene accumulation in a sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) red-flesh mutant. BMC Genomics 10, 540 (2009). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Pan Z. et al.. Comparative proteomics of a lycopene-accumulating mutant reveals the important role of oxidative stress on carotenogenesis in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] osbeck). Proteomics 9, 5455–5470 (2009). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Q. et al.. Transcriptome analysis of a spontaneous mutant in sweet orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] during fruit development. J Exp Bot 60, 801–813 (2009). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Giovannoni J. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 16, S170 (2004). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Baldwin E. A. In Biochemistry of fruit ripening (eds Seymour Graham, B., Taylor Jane E. & Tucker Gregory A.) 107–149 (Chapman & Hall, 1993). [Google Scholar]
- Katz E. et al.. Label-free shotgun proteomics and metabolite analysis reveal a significant metabolic shift during citrus fruit development. J Exp Bot 62, 5367–5384 (2011). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Katz E. et al.. The citrus fruit proteome: insights into citrus fruit metabolism. Planta 226, 989–1005 (2007). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Sweetlove L. J., Beard K. F. M., Nunes-Nesi A., Fernie A. R. & Ratcliffe R. G. Not just a circle: flux modes in the plant TCA cycle. Trends Plant Sci 15, 462–470 (2010). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Cercós M. et al.. Global analysis of gene expression during development and ripening of citrus fruit flesh. A proposed mechanism for citric acid utilization. Plant Mol Biol 62, 513–527 (2006). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Fatland B. L., Nikolau B. J. & Wurtele E. S. Reverse genetic characterization of cytosolic acetyl-CoA generation by ATP-citrate lyase in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell Online 17, 182–203 (2005). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Fatland B. L. et al.. Molecular characterization of a heteromeric atp-citrate lyase that generates cytosolic acetyl-coenzyme A in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 130, 740–756 (2002). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Etienne A., Génard M., Lobit P., Mbeguié-A-Mbéguié D. & Bugaud C. What controls fleshy fruit acidity? A review of malate and citrate accumulation in fruit cells. J Exp Bot 64, 1451–1469 (2013). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Sadka A., Dahan E., Cohen L. & Marsh K. B. Aconitase activity and expression during the development of lemon fruit. Physiol Plant 108, 255–262 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- Canel C., Bailey-Serres J. N. & Roose M. L. Molecular characterization of the mitochondrial citrate synthase gene of an acidless pummelo (Citrus maxima). Plant Mol Biol 31, 143–147 (1996). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Sadka A. et al.. Comparative analysis of mitochondrial citrate synthase gene structure, transcript level and enzymatic activity in acidless and acid-containing Citrus varieties. Funct Plant Biol 28, 383–390 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- Bogin E. & Wallace A. Organic acid synthesis and accumulation in sweet and sour lemon fruit. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 89, 182–194 (1966). [Google Scholar]
- Müller M. L. & Taiz L. Regulation of the lemon-fruit V-ATPase by variable stoichiometry and organic acids. J Membrane Biol 185, 209–220 (2002). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Brune A., Muller M., Taiz L., Gonzalez P. & Etxeberria E. Vacuolar acidification in citrus fruit: Comparison between acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia) and sweet lime (Citrus limmetioides) juice cells. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 127, 171–177 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- Müller M. L., Irkenskiesecker U., Rubinstein B. & Taiz L. On the mechanism of hyperacidification in lemon. Comparison of the vacuolar H+-ATPase activities of fruits and epicotyls. J Biol Chem 271, 1916–1924 (1996). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Shi C.-Y. et al.. Citrus PH5-like H+-ATPase genes: identification and transcript analysis to investigate their possible relationship with citrate accumulation in fruits. Front Plant Sci 6, 10.3389/fpls.2015.00135 (2015). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Aprile A. et al.. Expression of the H+-ATPase AHA10 proton pump is associated with citric acid accumulation in lemon juice sac cells. Func Integr Genomic 11, 551–563 (2011). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Shimada T., Nakano R., Shulaev V., Sadka A. & Blumwald E. Vacuolar citrate/H+ symporter of citrus juice cells. Planta 224, 472–480 (2006). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Hu X.-M. et al.. Genome-wide identification of citrus ATP-citrate lyase genes and their transcript analysis in fruits reveals their possible role in citrate utilization. Mol Genet Genomics 290, 29–38 (2015). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Chen M. et al.. Differential expression of organic acid degradation-related genes during fruit development of navel oranges (Citrus sinensis) in two habitats. Plant Mol Biol Rep 31, 1131–1140 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- Degu A. et al.. Inhibition of aconitase in citrus fruit callus results in a metabolic shift towards amino acid biosynthesis. Planta (Berlin) 234, 501–513 (2011). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Terol J., Soler G., Talon M. & Cercos M. The aconitate hydratase family from Citrus. BMC Plant Biol 10, 222 (2010). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Sadka A., Dahan E., Or E. & Cohen L. NADP+-isocitrate dehydrogenase gene expression and isozyme activity during citrus fruit development. Plant Sci 158, 173–181 (2000). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X. et al.. Identification and transcript analysis of two glutamate decarboxylase genes, CsGAD1 and CsGAD2, reveal the strong relationship between CsGAD1 and citrate utilization in citrus fruit. Mol Biol Rep 41, 6253–6262 (2014). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Crifò T., Puglisi I., Petrone G., Recupero G. R. & Lo Piero A. R. Expression analysis in response to low temperature stress in blood oranges: Implication of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. Gene 476, 1–9 (2011). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Perotti V. E., Figueroa C. M., Andreo C. S., Iglesias A. A. & Podestá F. E. Cloning, expression, purification and physical and kinetic characterization of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase from orange (Citrus sinensis osbeck var. Valencia) fruit juice sacs. Plant Sci 179, 527–535 (2010). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Schumacher K. & Krebs M. The V-ATPase: small cargo, large effects. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13, 724–730 (2010). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Gaxiola R. A., Palmgren M. G. & Schumacher K. Plant proton pumps. FEBS Lett 581, 2204–2214 (2007). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Xing S. et al.. ATP citrate lyase activity is post-translationally regulated by sink strength and impacts the wax, cutin and rubber biosynthetic pathways. The Plant J 79, 270–284 (2014). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Michelet B. & Boutry M. The plasma membrane H+-ATPase. Plant Physiol 108, 1–6 (1995). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Romero P., Lafuente M. T. & Rodrigo M. J. The Citrus ABA signalosome: identification and transcriptional regulation during sweet orange fruit ripening and leaf dehydration. J Exp Bot 63, 4931–4945 (2012). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Vinaixa M. et al.. A Guideline to Univariate Statistical Analysis for LC/MS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics-Derived Data. Metabolites 2, 775–795 (2012). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Want E. & Masson P. Processing and analysis of GC/LC-MS-based metabolomics data in Metabolic profiling: methods and protocols (ed. Metz O. T.) 277–298 (Humana Press, 2011). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Koressaar T. & Remm M. Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3. Bioinformatics 23, 1289–1291 (2007). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Livak K. J. & Schmittigen T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta CT) method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Luo A. C. et al.. Organic acid concentrations and the relative enzymatic changes during the development of the citrus fruits. Agr Sci China 2, 653–657 (2003). [Google Scholar]
- Hirai M. & Ueno I. Development of citrus fruits: Fruit development and enzymatic changes in juice vesicle tissue. Plant Cell Physiol 18, 791–799 (1977). [Google Scholar]
- Kaiser J. & Lewis O. Nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase activity in leaves and roots of nitrate-fed Helianthus annuus L. Plant Soil 77, 127–130 (1984). [Google Scholar]
- Zhou C.-X. et al.. Metabolomic profiling of mice serum during toxoplasmosis progression using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Sci Rep 6, 19557, 10.1038/srep19557 (2016). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tautenhahn R., Patti G. J., Rinehart D. & Siuzdak G. XCMS Online: A web-based platform to process untargeted metabolomic data. Anal Chem 84, 5035–5039 (2012). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Smith C. A. et al.. METLIN: a metabolite mass spectral database. Ther Drug Monit 27, 747–751 (2005). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29343
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep29343.pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Article citations
Analysis of sugar components and identification of SPS genes in citrus fruit development.
Front Plant Sci, 15:1372809, 28 Mar 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38606072 | PMCID: PMC11007184
Effects of exogenous melatonin on sugar and organic acid metabolism in early-ripening peach fruits.
PLoS One, 18(10):e0292959, 13 Oct 2023
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 37831703 | PMCID: PMC10575493
Vacuolar proteomic analysis reveals tonoplast transporters for accumulation of citric acid and sugar in citrus fruit.
Hortic Res, 11(1):uhad249, 28 Nov 2023
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 38288255 | PMCID: PMC10822839
Comprehensive analyses of the citrus WRKY gene family involved in the metabolism of fruit sugars and organic acids.
Front Plant Sci, 14:1264283, 15 Sep 2023
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 37780491 | PMCID: PMC10540311
Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal the effects of grafting on blood orange quality.
Front Plant Sci, 14:1169220, 01 Jun 2023
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 37360739 | PMCID: PMC10286243
Go to all (26) article citations
Data
Data behind the article
This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.
BioStudies: supplemental material and supporting data
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Assessment of sugar and sugar accumulation-related gene expression profiles reveal new insight into the formation of low sugar accumulation trait in a sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) bud mutant.
Mol Biol Rep, 47(4):2781-2791, 24 Mar 2020
Cited by: 11 articles | PMID: 32212013
Genome-wide identification and transcript analysis of vacuolar-ATPase genes in citrus reveal their possible involvement in citrate accumulation.
Phytochemistry, 155:147-154, 16 Aug 2018
Cited by: 6 articles | PMID: 30121429
Comparative proteomics of a lycopene-accumulating mutant reveals the important role of oxidative stress on carotenogenesis in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] osbeck).
Proteomics, 9(24):5455-5470, 01 Dec 2009
Cited by: 30 articles | PMID: 19834898
Reduced expression of CsPH8, a P-type ATPase gene, is the major factor leading to the low citrate accumulation in citrus leaves.
Plant Physiol Biochem, 160:211-217, 21 Jan 2021
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 33515970