Abstract
Background
Timing of extremity fracture fixation in patients with an associated major vascular injury remains controversial. Some favor temporary fracture fixation before definitive vascular repair to limit potential graft complications. Others advocate immediate revascularization to minimize ischemic time. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the timing of fracture fixation on outcomes in patients with concomitant long bone fracture and major arterial injury.Methods
Patients with a combined long bone fracture and major arterial injury in the same extremity requiring operative repair over 11 years were identified and stratified by timing of fracture fixation. Vascular-related morbidity (rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury, graft failure, extremity amputation) and mortality were compared between patients who underwent fracture fixation prerevascularization (PRE) or postrevascularization (POST).Results
One hundred four patients were identified: 19 PRE and 85 POST. Both groups were similar with respect to age, sex, Injury Severity Score, admission base excess, 24-hour packed red blood cells, and concomitant venous injury. The PRE group had fewer penetrating injuries (32% vs. 60%, p = 0.024) and a longer time to revascularization (9.5 vs. 5.8 hours, p = 0.0002). Although there was no difference in mortality (0% vs. 2%, p > 0.99), there were more vascular-related complications in the PRE group (58% vs. 32%, p = 0.03): specifically, rhabdomyolysis (42% vs. 19%, p = 0.029), graft failure (26% vs. 8%, p = 0.026), and extremity amputation (37% vs. 13%, p = 0.013). Multivariable logistic regression identified fracture fixation PRE as the only independent predictor of graft failure (odds ratio, 3.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-14.33; p = 0.03) and extremity amputation (odds ratio, 3.924; 95% confidence interval, 1.272-12.111; p = 0.017).Conclusion
Fracture fixation before revascularization contributes to increased vascular-related morbidity and was consistently identified as the only modifiable risk factor for both graft failure and extremity amputation in patients with a combined long bone fracture and major arterial injury. For these patients, delaying temporary or definitive fracture fixation until POST should be the preferred approach.Level of evidence
Prognostic study, Level IV.Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Alternative metrics
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/120368683
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1097/ta.0000000000003430
Article citations
Early major fracture care in polytrauma-priorities in the context of concomitant injuries: A Delphi consensus process and systematic review.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 97(4):639-650, 01 Aug 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39085995 | PMCID: PMC11446538
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Preventing biological waste: Effective use of viable tissue in traumatized lower extremities.
OTA Int, 6(4 suppl):e242, 11 Jul 2023
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 37448566 | PMCID: PMC10337847
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Lower extremity vascular injuries caused by firearms have a higher risk of amputation and death compared with non-firearm penetrating trauma.
J Vasc Surg, 72(4):1298-1304.e1, 27 Feb 2020
Cited by: 7 articles | PMID: 32115320
Predictors of poor outcome in infrainguinal bypass for trauma.
J Vasc Surg, 70(6):1816-1822, 24 Jun 2019
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 31248764
Paediatric extremity vascular injuries - experience from a large urban trauma centre in India.
Injury, 45(1):176-182, 11 Aug 2013
Cited by: 4 articles | PMID: 23993647
Contemporary management and time to revascularization in upper extremity arterial injury.
Vascular, 31(2):284-291, 13 Apr 2022
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 35418267
Review