Abstract

Introduction

The emergence of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in December 2019 was as a result of the outbreak of a novel human coronaviral pathogen, which was termed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This virus has a high similarity with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). The virus, SARS-CoV-2, belongs to a beta genus of coronaviruses and is the seventh member of human coronaviruses,^1,2 sharing ~80% sequence similarity to SARS-CoV.^3,4 Furthermore, the homology of SARS-CoV-2 is over 90% similar to those of coronaviruses from bats and pangolins, demonstrating its powerful ability to transmit cross-species.⁵ The virus shares a similar spherical structure to other coronaviruses (CoVs) with a diameter of ~100nm and is a single-stranded positive-sense RNA virus,^6,7 composed of four proteins: membrane (M) glycoprotein, nucleocapsid (N) protein, spike (S) glycoprotein, and envelope (E) glycoprotein.⁸ The N protein conjugates with genomic RNA to form nucleocapsid, while S, M, and E proteins combine to create an envelope to enclose the nucleocapsid.⁶ It was revealed that SARS-CoV-2 binds the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors under in the presence of the S protein and transmembrane protein serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) could infect target cells expressing ACE2 receptors,^9–12 including alveolar cells, macrophages, endothelial cells, kidney cells, intestinal epithelial cells, monocytes, neurons, glial cells, and neuroepithelial cells.^13–16 Interestingly, some reports discovered that S protein of SARS-CoV-2 contains specific domains encoding polybasic cleavage sites³ and SARS-CoV-2 exhibits a high affinity for human ACE2 receptor,^14,17 which may contribute to its stronger transmissibility and higher virulence compared with other CoVs.^18,19

SARS-CoV-2 has spread fast throughout the world after the first COVID-19 case was detected in Wuhan, infecting a huge number of people. As of May 2021, according to the World Health Organization, there were over 163 million clinically confirmed cases with over 3.3 million COVID-19-associated deaths worldwide. COVID-19 was initially defined as a respiratory infection with fever, fatigue, abnormal chest X-ray, cough, and shortness of breath.^20–22 In addition, a high proportion of COVID-19 patients exhibit neurological affectations during infection, such as hypogeusia, dizziness, headaches, myalgia, impaired consciousness, hyposmia, seizures, and ataxia.^23,24 SARS-CoV-2 is extensively evidenced to cause many neurological diseases,^25–28 similar to neurological manifestations previously reported for other respiratory viral infections,^29–31 however, neurological symptoms of COVID-19 are highly frequent and disabling.^32,33 In early investigations of COVID-19-positive patients in Wuhan, it was demonstrated that 36.4% displayed neurological manifestations, 8.9% presented PNS symptoms, the most prevalent of which was anosmia (5.1%).³⁴ In particular, in severe COVID-19, partial neurodegeneration, brain edema, even encephalitis was observed.^35–37 The neurodegenerative changes of cell death, hyperphosphorylation, and dislocation of Tau protein were documented in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells.¹⁰ Moreover, some COVID-19 patients were positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and brain tissue.^38–40 These findings imply that SARS-CoV-2 infections are not restricted to the respiratory systems, but they also can reach the CNS and induce neurological conditions.⁴¹

However, the neuroinvasive mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 remain unknown. COVID-19 is highly aggressive and is accompanied by hypoxia, abnormal clotting, and severe inflammation, so most CNS symptoms are identified as manifestations of peripheral pathologies. Concurrently, ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are vital for SARS-CoV-2 invasion and spread in the body, expressing suppressed levels in the brain,⁴² confirming that CNS symptoms are indications of peripheral pathologies. However, current research reveals that SARS-CoV-2 also can invade cells via Neuropilin-1 (NRP1),^43,44 BASIGIN (BSG),⁴⁵ Cathepsin L (CTSL), and furin⁴⁶ which have a higher and broader expression in the brain when compared to TMPRSS2 or ACE2.⁴⁷ This would be one mechanism through which SARS-CoV-2 propagates in the brain. Recent research has indicated that olfactory sensory neurons are a potential route for CNS invasion.^48–51 It is clear that pathological inflammation, as well as the cytokine storm initiated by COVID-19 outside the brain, impacted the CNS.^52–55 Understanding the invasion mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 in the nervous system is critical for the rational treatment of patients. Although the SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion mechanism is yet unknown, and considering the highly similar viral sequence from SARS-CoV, a similar neuroinvasiveness mechanism may be relevant for SARS-CoV-2.⁴¹ Herein, we review previously documented SARS-CoV-2-associated CNS and PNS complications and further discuss the varieties of potential neuroinvasiveness mechanisms to help neurologists better understand SARS-CoV-2 influence on the nervous system and facilitate diagnosis as well as reasonable COVID-19 treatment.

Neurological symptoms of COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 is extensively evidenced to present potential neuroinvasion. As a result, we reviewed studies on COVID-19, whose neurological manifestations could be assigned into three categories: CNS symptoms, PNS symptoms, and relative skeletal, muscular symptoms^34,56–58 (Fig. ​(Fig.11 and Table ​Table11).

Open in a separate window

Fig. 1

SARS-CoV-2-associated neurological symptoms. A variety of neurological manifestations are present in COVID-19 patients, such as encephalitis, encephalopathy, ageusia, anosmia, Miller Fisher syndrome, and Guillain-Barré syndrome

Central nervous system diseases and/or symptoms

Cerebrovascular disease is a group of diseases characterized by damage to brain tissues due to intracranial blood circulation disturbances, which generally occur in the brain’s blood vessels. As we know, virus infections can lead to vascular endothelial as well as vascular system damage, resulting in an overactive inflammation response, which can lead to ischemic and hemorrhagic infarcts and then further develop to thrombosis and vasculitis.^59,60

Although the primary manifestation of COVID-19 is lung disease, cerebrovascular disease is also a primary neurological complication of COVID-19 that is associated with a high mortality rate.⁶¹ A retrospective study suggested that the severe COVID-19 patients generally had acute cerebrovascular diseases.³⁴ The pooled prevalence of SARS-CoV-2-associated acute cerebrovascular disease is estimated to be 2.3%.⁶² An epidemiological and clinical characteristics study revealed that 52% of COVID-19 patients exhibited increased IL-6 levels, with 86% among them presenting high CRP levels, indicating a substantive inflammatory response.⁶³ Concurrently, inflammation is required in developing cerebrovascular diseases, leading to cerebrovascular events.⁶⁴ A Spanish medical center documented that among 1683 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 1.4% developed cerebrovascular disease, in which 73.9% of them had ischemic stroke, and 21.7% had hemorrhagic stroke with increased levels of ferritin.⁶⁵ Brain biopsies revealed thrombotic microangiopathy as well as endothelium injury, indicating that due to coagulopathy, seriously infected patients are highly vulnerable stroke.⁶⁶ Meanwhile, additional researches have also corroborated this perspective. For instance, examining severe patients indicated that these people developed coagulation dysfunctions and high D-dimer levels,⁶⁷ implying that those people may be at an increased risk of venous thrombosis accompanied by hemorrhagic stroke.⁶⁸ A 75-year-old COVID-19-related woman who had no notable pre-disposing factors but with severe bipartite pneumonia as well as acute pulmonary embolism implies that serious infections are an induced factor of acute venous embolism and associated stroke.^69,70 During COVID-19 dissemination, patients with cardiocerebrovascular risk factors are more susceptible to develop acute stroke.⁷¹ Six COVID-19 patients had an acute ischemic stroke in large vessels with typical signs of neurological dysfunctions, including aphasia, prosopoplegia, sensory loss, dysarthria, and acute confusion. Two patients exhibited multiple infarctions attributed to coinstantaneous venous as well as arterial thrombosis. Five cases were positive for lupus anticoagulants, demonstrating a coagulation disturbance. Angiograms showed occlusion of cerebral artery trunk or branches.⁷² In the other six cases, four patients were diagnosed with ischemic stroke, while the remaining two patients presented with hemorrhagic stroke. They all experienced severe pneumonia and complications in multiple organs, and high transaminase and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, indicating poor clinical outcomes. However, before COVID-19 outbreak, only one patient had a possible vascular risk factor associated with stroke.⁷³ Four SARS-CoV-2-infected patients from New York demonstrated that two of them developed subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) as well as hemorrhagic transformation following ischemic stroke, but SARS-CoV-2 remained undetectable in the CSF.⁷⁴ SARS-CoV-2 easily attacks the lung, lowering blood-oxygen saturation and then causing hypoxemia, resulting in altered consciousness, delirium or confusion, and intracerebral hemorrhage or acute/subacute stroke.^63,70,75 Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 impact on ACE2 receptor imbalances the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), resulting in microcirculation disorders, impairing the regulation of cerebral blood flow, and producing an excessive rise in blood pressure, hence increasing the risk of encephalorrhagia and ischemic stroke.^76,77 Hemorrhagic lesions may arise from coagulation dysfunctions caused by severe systemic infections or by invasions of the vascular endothelium by viruses.⁷⁸ As a result of cerebral white matter damage and blood vessels, the general state of CIVD-19 patients may aggravate.⁶⁶ The stress state caused by injuries to endothelial cells and hypoxia can promote inflammation, hypercoagulability, and pulmonary encephalopathy.⁷⁹

Although it is seemly hard for the virus to penetrate the CNS, CoVs can invade the CNS own their neurotropism;^80,81 then may lead to overreacting immune responses and induce fatal encephalitis and meningitis. Encephalitis refers to pathogen-induced inflammatory lesions (neuronal damage and nerve tissue injury) in brain parenchyma, with typical symptoms, including elevated temperature, headache, vomiting, fatigue, and consciousness disorders.⁸² Based on autopsy analyses of 17 cases, eight patients exhibiting cerebral edema and vascular congestion were found SARS-CoV-2 positive in brain tissue.⁴⁰ Another autopsy report also indicated edema in brain tissue and neuronal degenerations in SARS-CoV-2-infected people.⁸³ Meanwhile, a Japanese male with developed seizure as well as unconsciousness after fever and general weakness exhibited a SARS-CoV-2 positivity in the CSF and was diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2-related meningitis.³⁹ McAbee et al. presented an encephalitis case with positive SARS-CoV-2 in CSF, accompanied by increased red and white cells.³⁸ The team of Beijing Ditan Hospital evidenced SARS-CoV-2 positivity in the CSF of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients by genome sequencing, hence verifying viral encephalitis.⁸⁴ As known, immune cells and viruses can enter the brain via a weakened blood–brain barrier (BBB).⁸⁵ Even though not all patients test positive for SARS-CoV-2 in CSF, symptoms of nervous system infections and injuries implies the possibility of COVID-19-related neurological complications.⁵⁷

Acute necrotizing encephalopathy is a rare severe explosive encephalopathy and that is common as a result of viral infection. The pathogenesis of which is generally considered as cytokine storm-induced breakdown of blood–brain barrier.⁵⁴ Encephalopathy is recognized as the most common CNS complication of COVID-19, caused by hypoxia or systemic diseases.⁸⁶ Statistically, ~50% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have encephalopathy,⁸⁷ with common signs including dizziness, cognitive dysfunction, ataxia, mental disorder, or even impaired consciousness. Old people with hepatic, cardiovascular, and renal comorbidities, as well as immunosuppressed persons, are more likely to develop encephalopathy following COVID-19 infection.³⁴ A 50-year older woman was the first to be diagnosed with acute necrotizing hemorrhagic encephalopathy associated with COVID-19, with primary symptoms of fever, altered mental state, and cough, and neuroimaging indicated symmetrical multifocal changes as well as thalamic invasions.⁸⁸ Reichard et al. reported that a COVID-19 patient appeared to die of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis according to pathological findings.⁸⁹ Meanwhile, some people manifest unexpected seizures owing to high fever. Combined with analysis of patients previously found to have epilepsy, apprehension and sleep disorders caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may be an additional trigger for epilepsy.⁹⁰ Four SARS-CoV-2-infected patients aged 60–70 years presented with seizures and exhibited elevated blood pressure and renal injury, systemic inflammation, and hypercoagulopathy and were diagnosed with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES).⁹¹ Moreover, autopsy analyses of four confirmed COVID-19 cases revealed hypoxia-induced cerebral impairments and observed small perivascular lesions that appeared in the white matter.⁹² However, there is no clear evidence to indicate whether neuropathologic lesions are caused by primary vascular diseases that are a result of damage to white matter or demyelinating diseases through a by-infectious mechanism.

Peripheral nervous system symptoms

The SARS-CoV-2 virus can cause chemosensory disorders, including anosmia, ageusia, hyposmia, etc.^5,93,94 Over one-third of confirmed COVID-19 patients exhibit smell or taste disturbances,⁶² which can develop prior to, contemporaneously, or after fever and cough.⁹⁵ Approximately 50% of patients experience anosmia or ageusia in the early stages of COVID-19.^96,97 It is also reported that about 11.8% of COVID-19 cases manifested an olfactory disorder before developing other symptoms, implying that anosmia is crucial for early disease detection.⁹⁸ Statistics indicate that anosmia and ageusia can be regarded as COVID-19 predictors. When combined with fever, discrimination accuracy can increase up to 75%.⁹⁹ Although the prevalence of dysosmia and dysgeusia decreases in older people,¹⁰⁰ female patients have higher smell disturbance.¹⁰¹ Another research indicated that about 12% of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients develop only anosmia as their initial symptom.⁵⁷ A clinical study analysis with 33 COVID-19 cases reported that ~63.6% of patients developed chemosensitive dysfunction, and 13 patients presented combined anosmia and ageusia.¹⁰² Moreover, patients may exhibit other related sensory dysfunctions, such as tinnitus, sore throat, vertigo, dysphagia, and hearing.^103,104 These studies indicate that SARS-CoV-2 virus can cause hyposmia and anosmia, implying that thorough examination of otolaryngologic manifestations may assist in early COVID-19 diagnosis.

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a PNS condition, is induced by overactive immune system, which attacks the PNS by mistake.¹⁰⁵ The initial signs are tingling and weakness in the periphery, but they can rapidly distribute leading to whole-body paralysis. Representative neurological manifestations include progressive dysergia, flaccid paralysis, and areflexia. The first case of COVID-19-related GBS was a 61-year-old woman from Wuhan, China.¹⁰⁶ The initial symptom was the weakness of the lower limbs which is in line with the neurological examination: areflexia and symmetric weakness in both legs and feet. Various examination results revealed lymphocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated protein levels in CSF, and motor and sensory nerve demyelination, all of which were suggestive with GBS. Another GBS patient was a 71-year-old male in Italy who had no history of neurological disorder.¹⁰⁷ Although brain CT scan revealed normal findings, electroneurography measurements indicated the absence of tibial nerve compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and sural nerve sensory nerve action potential (SAP), indicating peripheral neuropathy caused by demyelination, a typical feature of GBS. Toscano et al. documented five COVID-19-related cases with limb or facial paresis as well as paresthesia within some days after the appearance of COVID-19 symptoms.¹⁰⁸ MRI results revealed caudal roots or facial nerve enhancement, indicating that nerves undergo immune response. To date, a rapid increase of GBS cases has been confirmed in COVID-19 patients.^109,110 However, a previous epidemiological cohort study found no relationship between GBS and COVID-19.¹¹¹ It is unclear whether the causative agent for GBS is SARS-COV-2 virus itself or other infections secondary to COVID-19-related patients, therefore, more studies are required to elucidate on this phenomenon.

SARS-CoV-2 infection can result in dyspnea and decrease the blood-oxygen saturation by attacking lung.⁶³ Indeed, severe COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can cause serious systemic hypoxemia, which may be related to congestion and edema observed in brain tissue.^34,112 Meanwhile, hypoxemia induced by ARDS and lung injury may promote SARS-CoV-2 to invade the brain tissue. A study about three COVID-19 patients without breathing difficulties under low oxygen tension has been reported.¹¹³ These patients had extremely low blood-oxygen levels, which would result in unconscious or multiple organ failures. However, all of them were awake and had no signs of dyspnea, challenging the understanding of basic biology nowadays. Notably, patients with hypoxemia may exhibit mild symptoms but may rapidly progress to multiple organ failure and death.¹¹⁴ Another research indicated that severe systemic hypoxemia would aggravate dementia symptoms in AD patients infected with COVID-19.^115,116 To date, various hypotheses have been advanced to account for hypoxemia. One is that SARS-CoV-2 may directly act on oxidation-sensitive receptors, alter respiratory center responses to low oxygen levels, and modify the way PCO2 to blunt the response of the brain to hypoxia.¹¹³ Another hypothesis indicates that in a corticolimbic network, SARS-CoV-2 can cause neuronal damage that may alter the secretion of endogenous neuropeptides or neurotransmitters, which are related to perceptual effects.¹¹⁷ More studies are needed to confirm or disprove these views in the future.

Skeletal muscular symptoms

Skeletal muscular symptoms are another prevalent PNS complication of COVID-19 patients, presenting tiredness, myositis, myalgia, and skeletal muscle injury. Several cases of skeletal muscular symptoms in SARS-CoV-2-positive people have been reported.³⁴ Research of 213 COVID-19 cases indicated that ~85.2% of patients had significantly elevated serum creatine kinase. Another published study demonstrated elevated lactate dehydrogenase and creatine kinase levels, which may be caused by skeletal muscle injury.¹¹⁸ Mehan et al. described nine COVID-19 cases who had backache, dyskinesia, and paresthesia in lower limbs. Seven patients exhibited intramuscular edema through spinal cord MRI, confirming paraspinal myositis.¹¹⁹ In addition, most coronavirus infections could result in functional defects as well as myalgias in skeletal muscles with increased CK levels.¹²⁰ Similar skeletal muscular symptoms were found in the studies of SARS-CoV.¹²¹ Virus-induced elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines level might be another reason to aggravate the muscular injury.¹²² However, additional research should be conducted to validate whether SARS-CoV-2 can cause skeletal muscular sequelae in the long term.

Mechanisms through which SARS-CoV-2 invades the nervous system

Generally, the CNS with a very intricate brain barrier system to defend against the virus invasion, including blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, blood–brain barrier (BBB), and brain-cerebrospinal fluid barrier. Although the CNS is protected by multilayer barriers, where also can be invaded by various viruses involved in the glial cell or neuronal invasions.¹²³ Coronaviruses were reported to reach the CNS causing neurovirulence.¹²⁴ However, the exact mechanism of coronaviruses invade the CNS has not been fully distinct.¹²⁵ Mostly, viral infections start from peripheral tissues and then spread to the peripheral nerves and finally reaches the central nervous system.¹²⁶ This process may explain the presence of neurological lesions, like demyelination.¹²⁷ ACE2 is highly expressed on vascular endothelial cells, and also expressed on olfactory epitheliums, striatum, cortex, substantia nigra, as well as the brainstem,¹²⁸ suggesting SARS-CoV-2 can directly infect vascular endothelial cells to cross the BBB and then can infect cells throughout the CNS. The ACE2 receptor is also expressed on glial cells and neurons of various structures, including olfactory epitheliums, striatum, cortex, substantia nigra, as well as the brainstem, implying that SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to infect cells in the CNS. Moreover, in COVID-19 patients, hyposmia is a frequent complication, indicating the infection of the olfactory nerve. Therefore, the synaptic connections via olfactory nerves would be another mechanism through which SARS-CoV-2 enters the CNS. SARS-CoV-2-induced inflammation is also considered to disrupt the BBB allowing virus to enter the CNS.^129,130

CNS expression of key viral infection factors

Transcribial route and neuronal transport dissemination

Numerous evidence indicated that certain CoVs initially invaded peripheral nerve terminals and then spread throughout CNS through anterograde/retrograde of synapses,^41,83,148 including HEV67,^148,149 as well as OC43-CoV.²⁹ In the PNS, the olfactory nerve is the main route for SARS-CoV-2 to invade CNS due to high levels of TMPRSS2 and ACE2 in olfactory epithelium cells, both of which are required for viral binding and accumulation.^{125,131,150,151} The olfactory nerve is a CNS conduction bundle instead of a real nerve, which directly contacts the brain (Fig. ​(Fig.22).^152,153 In the nasal cavity, the olfactory mucosa is composed of neurons, Bowman’s glands, basal cells, and epithelial cilia.^154–156 The special olfactory neuroepithelium of the nasal cavity has an apical surface composed primarily of sustentacular cells.¹⁵⁷ Support cells were demonstrated to present high levels of TMPRSS2 and ACE2,⁴⁹ indicating that they were predisposed to SARS-CoV-2 infection.⁴⁸ As observed in the hamster, OE infection would spread to horizontal basal cells (HBCs) and then to immature or mature olfactory neurons.⁵¹ Meanwhile, the infected HBCs subsequently matured into OSNs, which would reach OB via a synaptic path that may potentially infect CNS.¹⁵⁸ Through this way, a peripheral infection could access OB and further spread throughout the brain. Another autopsy study presented that SARS-CoV-2 invaded CNS by traversing the neural mucosal and subsequently penetrated the neuroanatomical areas with olfactory tract projections, such as respiratory as well as cardiovascular control centers in the medulla.¹³⁹ The authors also observed the characteristic CoV substructures and SARS-CoV-2 RNA in olfactory epithelium cells and olfactory mucus cells. The viral load in olfactory mucosa, medulla oblongata, olfactory tubercle, oral mucosa, olfactory bulb, trigeminal ganglion, and cerebellum were assessed by means of RT-qPCR.¹³⁹ The human ACE2 transgenic mice were intranasally administered with SARS-CoV-1, and the related antibodies evaluated in OB, parts of cortical areas, as well as the basal ganglia ~60–66h later.¹⁵⁹ Four days after first exposure, the infection was spread through most OB and distributed to most areas of the brain as well, including the hypothalamus, pons, medulla, thalamus, midbrain, amygdala, basal ganglia, hippocampus, and cortex.¹⁵⁹ These data indicate that OB is a route for coronavirus CNS infection. In addition, in the model of hamster, SARS-CoV-2 was observed to infect OB and the brain.^48,50,51,160 Moreover, our previous research demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 primarily invades the CNS via OB in rhesus monkey and subsequently viruses quickly spread to other areas of the CNS, including the hippocampus, medulla oblongata, and thalamus.¹⁶¹ Although the exact mechanism of early CNS invasion remained unclear, when these results are combined, it is plausible that SARS-CoV-2 infection can spread to the brain after it reaches OB. In this condition, it is speculated that SARS-CoV-2 infection spreads from the olfactory epithelium to the olfactory bulb and then to the olfactory nerve, applying endocytosis and exocytosis for trans-synaptic transfers^28,162 (Fig. ​(Fig.22).

Open in a separate window

Fig. 2

SARS-CoV-2 may invade the brain through the olfactory nerve. SARS-CoV-2 infects the olfactory epithelium via the ACE2 receptor. The olfactory epithelium surrounds horizontal basal cells with ACE2 receptor. Human horizontal basal cells express ACE2, suggesting they can be infected by SARS-CoV-2. Horizontal basal cells can further mature into olfactory neurons. We propose that infected horizontal basal cells can mature into SARS-CoV-2-infected olfactory neurons. These infected olfactory neurons share a synaptic connection with neurons in the olfactory bulb (OB). This may allow for viral spread from the periphery into the CNS. The OB has many connections throughout the brain. This allows for rapid viral transit to many areas of the brain

In addition to the olfactory nerve, SARS-CoV-2 may employ other potential peripheral nerves to reach the brain, including the trigeminal, vagus, and nasopharyngeal nerves. Anatomically, the vagus nerve is a part of the enteric nervous system and connects to gastrointestinal tracts with elevated expressions of NRP1 and ACE2. Both ACE2 and TMPRRSS2 are expressed in intestinal enteric neurons and glia, indicating that they are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2.¹⁶³ The gut–brain axis is a critical component to cause CNS disorders.¹⁶⁴ A study of 42 COVID-19 patients found that ~66.67% of them were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in feces.¹⁶⁵ In vitro, SARS-CoV-2 was shown to infect human intestinal epithelium.¹⁶⁶ The virus would spread from duodenal cells to the brainstem neurons via anterograde and retrograde transmission.¹⁶⁷ Consequently, it is reasonable that SARS-CoV-2-infected enterocyte would spread to neuronal and glial cells of enteric nervous systems and finally invade CNS through the vagus nerve.^125,168 In this route, various data showed that initial SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lung would cause subsequent viral spreading to the brain, specifically the areas of the thalamus and brainstem, including the vagus nerve medullary nuclei.¹⁶⁹ Matsuda et al. documented that, through the vagus nerve, influenza A virus spread from the respiratory tract to the vagal ganglia.¹⁷⁰ Another study demonstrated ACE2 expression of the vagal complex in rodents.¹⁷¹ However, the data in humans are scarce, and more studies are required to disseminate SARS-CoV-2 vagus nerve. Similarly, trigeminal and nasopharyngeal nerves may be another route for SARS-CoV-2 to reach the brain because both are exposed to the virus. Aoyagi et al. described a COVID-19 patient who developed dysphagia and observed dysregulated pharyngolaryngeal sensations, mesopharyngeal contractile dysfunction, and silent aspiration through the video endoscopy, high-resolution manometry, and videofluorography implying possible infections of the trigeminal or nasopharyngeal nerves.¹⁷² In addition, studies should evaluate the expressions of ACE2, TMPRRSS2, NRP1, and other related proteins to confirm whether these mechanisms can cause CNS infections in COVID-19 patients.

SARS-CoV-2 infects vascular endothelial cells and crosses the BBB

According to reports, infection and injury of epithelial barrier cells enable the virus to access the lymphatic system and bloodstream and further spread to various organs, such as the brain.²⁸ Autopsy analyses of lungs of five COVID-19-confirmed patients revealed that viral proteins were observed in lung capillaries and after SARS-CoV-2 infection led to endothelial necrosis and capillary damage.¹⁷⁵ SARS-CoV-2 causes damage to lung blood vessels.^175,176 Although only a small number of COVID-19 patients have been shown to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 in blood, it suggests that the virus reaches the bloodstream and possibly infects other organs, like the brain.¹⁷⁷ Once the virus has gained access to the bloodstream, it can rapidly infect the endothelial cells in the vasculature due to expressions of ACE2, TMPRSS2, and NRP1^42,178 (Fig. ​(Fig.3).3). Moreover, a structural analysis of the postmortem examination of a COVID-19 patient indicated that viral particles presented in neural as well as capillary endothelial cells of the frontal lobe tissue, implying that virus can access the brain by infecting vascular endothelial cells.¹⁶ Autopsy analyses of three COVID-19 patients revealed that SARS-CoV-2 could infect endothelial cells, and endotheliitis were detected in both lungs, kidney, heart, small intestines, and liver.¹⁷⁹ Additionally, an in vitro study in human blood vessel organoids demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 invasion and replication, corroborating the mechanism by which infected brain endothelial cells allow blood-borne viruses to enter the brain.¹⁸⁰ Generally speaking, due to the presence of BBB, infections do not frequently occur in the brain, even when viruses or bacteria are present in the bloodstream. BBB comprises neurons, pericytes, astrocytes, vascular smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells.¹⁸¹ The brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMVECs) are a major BBB component. The main function of BBB is to protect the brain by preventing hematogenous entry of pathogens and neurotoxic compounds into the brain.¹⁸² Consequently, the virus needs to pass blood–brain barrier and infect the brain through the hematogenous route. Previous research confirmed that ACE2⁴² and NRP1¹⁷⁸ are expressed in human BMVECs, indicating that they may be potential SARS-CoV-2 targets (Fig. ​(Fig.3).3). To date, the evidence about SARS-CoV-2 infecting BMVECs of the BBB are limited; only one autopsy study described the viral-associated proteins detected in BMVECs of the frontal lobe of a COVID-19 patient.¹⁶ This shows that SARS-CoV-2 infects BMVECs of the BBB, even though this infection from the brain or blood is unclear. Meanwhile, in vitro, JHM OMP1, a kind of coronavirus, was shown to infect isolated BMVECs from humans and rhesus macaques,¹⁸³ indicating that some coronaviruses can invade BMVECs. Choroid plexus exhibited a highly permeable blood–CSF barrier than BBB and was found to express ACE2 and TMPRSS2,¹⁶³ implying that it may be another potential route through which the virus invades the CNS. According to a study conducted on a human choroid plexus model, SARS-CoV-2 not only infected the choroid plexus cells but also destroyed the blood–CSF barrier, providing another route for the virus to enter the brain.¹⁸⁴ All these data show that coronavirus can directly invade as well as replicate in vascular endothelial cells and cross the BBB (Fig. ​(Fig.33).

Open in a separate window

Fig. 3

SARS-CoV-2 possibly directly infects vascular endothelial cells via the ACE2 or NRP1 receptors. Viral particles in the bloodstream can reach the brain through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) by infecting and replicating inside brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infection of neurons by SARS-CoV-2 and the increased BBB permeability could be responsible for severe neurological symptoms in COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 initiated systemic inflammatory responses to disrupt the BBB

SARS-CoV-2 may also gain entry into the CNS via inflammation, which disrupts the blood–brain barrier. Even though it has not been conclusively demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 infection results in inflammation that allows viral entry into CNS, we offer three probable mechanisms based on existing research.

SARS-CoV-2 initiates cytokine secretion by immune cells

Immune responses resulted from a viral infection can cause nervous system damage. It is worth mentioning that SARS-CoV-2 has the ability to infect immune cells, which may subsequently invade CNS. SARS-CoV-2 was demonstrated to activate various immune cells, including macrophages/monocytes, T cells, neutrophils, and natural killer cells (Fig. ​(Fig.4).4). These activated immune cells, in turn, could kill the virus through cytokine release,^185–189 including interleukin (IL), interferon (IFN), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and chemokine.¹²⁹ In normal physiological conditions, pro-inflammatory factors and immune cells can form a positive feedback cycle to keep the balance of cytokines.¹⁸⁵ However, SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause excessive immune responses, triggering a systemic inflammatory response due to cytokine storms, and then mainly cause damage to blood vessels^112,173 (Fig. ​(Fig.4).4). The cytokine storms with remarkable BBB permeability effects may allow the virus or infected immune cells to reach the brain, promoting related CNS symptoms.^129,130 It has been demonstrated that infected peripheral lymphocytes and macrophages act as dissemination vehicles to facilitate the pass across BBB, meninges, and choroid plexus.^173,190 SARS-CoV-2 was reported to primarily infect human monocytes, whereas MERS-CoV was found to infect both T cells and monocytes. Meanwhile, SARS-CoV-2 was determined to infect dendritic cells. However, both monocytes and macrophages presented low ACE2 expression, implying that an unknown mechanism might exist in communications between the host innate immune response and SARA-CoV-2. The exact mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 infects immune cells remains unknown.

Open in a separate window

Fig. 4

SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause excessive peripheral immune responses to result in BBB dysfunction. a The cytokine storms with remarkable BBB permeability effects may allow the virus or infected immune cells reach the brain. b Possible CNS pathological mechanisms caused by the severe peripheral hyperinflammation associated with COVID-19. The infected immune cells invade in brain and release cytokines to activate glial cells to release pro-inflammatory cytokines and VEGF which could cause severe neurological symptoms in COVID-19

Activated glial cells secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines

Several neurotropic viruses were demonstrated to infect glial cells, causing them to become pro-inflammatory and secrete various cytokines.¹⁹¹ As mentioned above, ACE2 is expressed on glial cells (Fig. ​(Fig.4).4). Concurrently, glial cells are a component of BBB. Therefore, it may be that SARS-CoV-2 entered in CNS via hematogenous route, olfactory nerve, or other mechanisms, which also possibly infect glial cells and cause a pro-inflammatory state^84,192 (Fig. ​(Fig.4).4). Moreover, Lechien et al. observed numerous inflammatory factors produced by glial cells after SARS-CoV-2 infection, including interleukin-6, interleukin-15, tumor necrosis factor α, and so on.⁹⁸ In turn, these cytokines can disrupt BBB, enabling the virus to enter the brain and finally induce symptoms of CNS diseases. To date, there are few reports on glial cells of COVID-19 patients. Whether SARS-CoV-2 invades glial cells via binding to ACE2 or by other glial cell receptors remains unclear. Additional research is required to demonstrate SARS-CoV-2 effects on glial cells.

Vascular endothelial growth factor initiates inflammatory responses

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with a wide distribution in CNS mainly regulates angiogenesis, endothelial cell proliferation, and vascular permeability.¹⁹³ It has been reported that astrocytes express VEGF and FIt-1 following CNS trauma and that inflammatory cells are the main source of VEGF in the injured CNS.^194–196 In addition, the renin–angiotensin system was activated following SARS-CoV-2 binding to ACE2, which was relevant to the inflammation response, and then through the combination of angiotensin II (Ang II) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) to promote VEGF synthesis. In most brain diseases, VEGF was found to cause inflammatory responses to disrupt BBB rather than promoting angiogenesis alone.^193,197 Angiogenesis is invariably associated with inflammation, resulting in increased vascular permeability and inflammatory cell recruitment¹⁹⁷ (Fig. ​(Fig.4).4). ACE2 can respectively catalyze Ang I and Ang II to Ang 1–9 and Ang 1–7.¹⁹⁸ Since SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2, an active enzyme can boost the signaling of the ACE/Ang II/AT1R axis, resulting in excessive Ang II production. Excessive Ang II promoted the growth of ACE2 in the SARS-CoV-2-infected brain. Consequently, VEGF further enhanced Ang II, indicating a vicious circle in releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-8, IL-6, TNF-a, and IL-1b^193,199 (Fig. ​(Fig.4).4). Among these cytokines, IL-6 is an essential member of the pro-inflammatory cytokine family, inducing various proteins correlated with acute inflammation.²⁰⁰ In addition, the hyper-inflammatory syndrome of COVID-19 was reported to mainly involve IL-6.²⁰¹ IL-6 was deemed as an indication of respiratory failure in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.²⁰² Besides, another research indicated that severe COVID-19 symptoms are positively correlated with IL-6 levels. As a result, IL-6 may be considered as a predictive marker of COVID-19 severity.^84,188

Experimental models for nerve system studies

Experimental models should be thoughtfully selected due to the complex interactions between the host and SARS-CoV-2. The rational use of animal models enables us to obtain reliable scientific data and address problems of interest. Although many animals and humans may exhibit similar physiological, pathological, or even therapeutic responses to the same diseases, it is essential to keep in mind that variations among species can lead to incorrect conclusions.²⁰³ Therefore, it is critical to establish a connection between human disease and model.²⁰⁴ To understand the exact mechanism through which SARS-CoV-2 invades the nerve system, animal or cellular models that can mimic the symptoms as well as pathological processes of SARS-CoV-2 nerve infection patients is urgently needed. Here, we summarize the current in vivo and in vitro experimental models applied to study SARS-CoV-2 infection of the nervous system.

CNS cell lines

Most research methods of SARS-CoV-2 currently available are based on SARS-CoV due to their 78% nucleotide homology.²⁰⁵ Although the neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2 has been demonstrated,²⁰⁶ no specialized neural cell line models have been applied to study it. Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hIPSCs), such as neurons, microglia, and neural progenitor cells (NPCs), have been employed as in vitro models to evaluate nervous infections of SARS-CoV-2.^138,207 The HOG cell line is obtained from human oligodendroglioma and is usually used to study neurons, while the cell line C6 derived from glioma is used to study neural susceptibilities to SARS-CoV-2 infection.^208–211 However, both of these two cell lines exhibit low viral replication levels compared with other susceptible cell lines, such as Caco-2 or Vero E6.²¹² Meanwhile, human H4 brain neuroglioma cells, CHME-5 human fetal microglia cell line, LA-N-5 human neuroblastoma cell line, as well as U-87 MG and U-373 MG astrocytic lines have been employed to study CNS virulence abilities of HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E.^213–218 In addition, oligodendrocytes, microglia, human primary neurons, and astrocytes have been utilized to investigate these various viruses.^219,220 Therefore, nerve cell lines are possibly appropriate to study SARS-CoV-2, which requires additional research in the future.

Brain organoids as SARS-CoV-2 CNS infection model

As in vitro 3D culture systems derived from self-organizing stem cells, organoids are composed of multiple cell types and can imitate the physiological conditions of corresponding human organs such as architecture, functioning, and genetic signature.^221,222 In addition, organoids can overcome the limitations of cell culture systems, including the incapacity to study cell–cell interactions. As a result, organoids are suitable models to study various human physiological or pathological processes, including infection, neurotropisms, and possible treatments for SARS-CoV-2.^222–224 Although infections by SARS-CoV-2 mainly cause lung injury, other organs like the liver, kidney, cardiovascular system, and nervous system are also affected.^225–227 Currently, human lung, liver, kidney, intestine, and blood vessels organoids have been deployed to study SARS-CoV-2 infection.^{138,180,228–230} Human brain organoids have been applied to study SARS-CoV-2 CNS infections. In these brain organoids, viruses were observed to mainly infect mature cortical neurons, and neurodegenerative effects were also detected in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells, such as hyperphosphorylation, cell necrosis, and Tau protein mislocation.²⁰⁷ Furthermore, these authors discovered no procreative virus replication in the first 4 days after infection, corroborating the postulate that CNS may be a long-term SARS-CoV-2 reservoir.²³¹ Bullen et al. detected an increased viral titer in neural cells between 6 and 72h post-brain organoid infections with SARS-CoV-2, implying an active viral replication in neural cells during initial days.²³² Not only were these viral particles found in the neuronal soma, but also in the neurites.²³² Mesci et al. also observed SARS-CoV-2 infection in neurons, including mature cortical neurons and NPCs, as well as cell death associated with the injury of excitatory synapses.²³³ Moreover, this study evaluated the efficiency of Sofosbuvir in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection, which is a brain-penetrant antiviral drug for RNA virus approved by FDA.²³⁴ The results demonstrated that viral accumulation and neuronal death were decreased after Sofosbuvir treatment in brain organoids.²³³ Similarly, Song et al. described the neuroinvasive capacity of SARS-CoV-2 in brain organoids, especially in NPCs and mature cortical neurons.²³⁵ Hypermetabolic state in the infected cells and the accumulation of viral particles in endoplasmic reticulum-like structures were both observed, implying virus replication in neural cells. Furthermore, severe SARS-CoV-2-infected areas accompanied by a hypoxic environment and massive neuronal death indicated that SARS-CoV-2 infection causes the death of nearby neural cells.²³⁵ Finally, IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 from CSF of patients with COVID-19 were demonstrated to block SARS-CoV-2 invasion in human brain organoids.²³⁵ In summary, SARS-CoV-2 is neuroinvasive and may further cause CNS diseases. Concurrently, these studies also reveal that human brain organoids are optimal in vitro model for studying SARS-CoV-2 infection in CNS.

Animal models

Due to the interconnected and intricate connections between various organs of the human body, the exact mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 invasion can only be understood through systemic interaction between virus and host. Although various cell lines and organoids as in vitro models are faster systems to study CNS infection of SARS-CoV-2, these studies are only limited to specific cell types and organs. Consequently, the in vivo models are critical for exploring the complex pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2. To date, several animal models have been used to investigate SARS-CoV-2 brain infection, including mouse, hamster, ferret, and non-human primates. SARS-CoV-2 infectivity varies due to differences in the capacity of the virus to combine with various ACE2 species.²³⁶ Therefore, in these in vivo models, it is critical to adopt appropriate approaches to identify SARS-CoV-2 presence in tissues and explore the advantages and limitations of these methods. Plaque formation indicates virus replication but not cellular localization. PCR reveals RNA information rather than cellular localization and virus replication, and whether subgenomic RNA implies the active replication remains unknown.²³⁷ Antibodies against viral spike protein or nucleocapsid demonstrate cellular localization but cannot differentiate the whole virus from cleaved proteins in the brain.²³⁸ In situ hybridization provides both tissue localization and viral RNA.²³⁸

SARS-CoV-2 exhibits low infectivity to wild-type mice; therefore, to study the infectivity and spread of SARS-CoV-2 in this species, either mice must be engineered to express human ACE2, or SARS-CoV-2 virus must be mice-adapted.^239,240 Currently, multiple engineered mouse models have been established to study SARS-CoV-2 invasion.^240–244 SARS-CoV-2 can infect the olfactory epithelium of mice expressing human ACE2 (hACE2), and whether infection further progresses to the brain is likely dependent on promoter type, which controls hACE2 expression. Previous researches demonstrated that mild infection symptoms and few SARS-CoV-2 viral particles were detected in brains of mice models expressing hACE2 when promoters were exogenous or endogenous murine ACE2 or cytomegalovirus (CMV).^{137,244–246} In these models, the evidence for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 mostly based on PCR,^247,248 but did not prove through in situ hybridization or immunocytochemistry. The K18-hACE2 mice were generated to study SARS-CoV-1 several years ago, their expressions of hACE2 were controlled by K18 cytokeratin. It has been reported that these mice models are frequently fatal, possibly due to infections of the brain,^{137,243,244,249–254} but the new mice models constructed through CRISPR/Cas9 and knock-in methods do not exhibit neuroinvasion.²³⁹ Human ACE2 expression replaces endogenous ACE2 expression in these new mouse models, which are physiologically realistic than K18-hACE2 mice, but the utilized adenoviral vector may occasionally provoke host responses.²⁴² Numerous viruses, including mouse hepatitis virus, human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43), and herpes simplex virus, have previously been reported to readily infect olfactory neurons and further spread to secondary and tertiary olfactory brain centers.^{29,158,255–258} However, in the new mice models and wild-type animals, few SARS-CoV-2 infections were detected in olfactory circuits, may be due to a deficiency of virus entry proteins in olfactory neurons. Viruses with strong neuroagression exhibit a common characteristic of high expression of their entry proteins in infected neurons.^{29,158,256–258} The studies in mice models using human ACE2 expression that monitored the arrival time of virus in different brain structures revealed that SARS-CoV-2 infection in olfactory bulbs was not more than other brain structures, such as the brainstem, hypothalamus, and thalamic nuclei.^249,253,254 The limitation of engineered mice models is that hACE2 expression may not occur in the same cell types as expressed in humans, and may not have the same expression levels as well, and hence may not cause SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion in these mice even with normal ACE2 expression. Thus, experimental data from these mice must be analyzed prudently.²⁵⁹

Hamsters are considered better physiological animal models for exploring SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion since their ACE2 expression can cause medium-to-high SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, which is similar to that of humans.^{51,236,259,260} Seven researches using hamster models determined whether the virus could be present in the brain following nasal inoculation with SARS-CoV-2.^{48,50,51,160,260–262} Three of them revealed virus or viral RNA in the brain or olfactory bulb;^260–262 however, four studies observed no brain infection.^48,50,51,160 Using different viral titers might cause these differences between studies during infection. Indeed, different studies have demonstrated that viral titer varies up to 10000-fold, from 10 to 1×10⁵ plaque-forming units,^51,262, and the virus was commonly detected in the brain when higher virus titers were employed during infection.⁵¹

Ferrets have been utilized as animal models to study the infection mechanism of various viruses, such as SARS-CoV or influenza.^263–265 In addition, it has been proven that ferrets are sensitive to SARS-CoV-2 infection.^236,266,267 In most studies the inoculation of SARS-CoV-2 was the intranasal route in ferrets.^268–270 Viruses were observed in the brain in some ferrets, and viral antigen was detected in the nasal cavity, nasal respiratory, and olfactory epithelium.²⁶⁷ In ferret models, viruses were observed in the brain only through plaque formation or quantitative PCR, rather than immunocytochemistry, which caused difficulty in determining the cellular source of viruses. Therefore, more evidence are required to demonstrate SRAS-CoV-2 neuroinvasiveness in ferret models.

Since non-human primates have been employed to investigate Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus and SARS-CoV,^271–273 these models were considered suitable for studying SARS-CoV-2 as well. Six studies surveyed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the brain following nasal or upper respiratory route inoculation. Three of them did not observe SARS-CoV-2 in the brain through quantitative PCR.^274–276 Another three studies detected viral RNA in several brain regions.^161,277,278 Recently, using rhesus monkeys, we found that SARS-CoV-2 can also invade the CNS via the olfactory route.¹⁶¹ In this study, SARS-CoV-2 viral protein was observed not only in the olfactory bulb but also in the thalamus, hippocampus entorhinal area, and medulla oblongata. Further research revealed that SARS-CoV-2 can invade the CNS but without efficient infection as well as replication.¹⁶¹ The viruses appeared rapidly in CSF, implying that neuronal transfers along olfactory nerves may not be the only pathway for SARS-CoV-2 to reach the brain and that alternative routes may exist.

Most viruses in humans were found in the olfactory epithelium, particularly in sustentacular cells.^43,139,260 In some patients, the infections occurred in the brain, including the brainstem, thalamus, and hypothalamus.¹³⁹ In some cases, viruses were also detected in the cerebral cortex, choroid plexus, and CSF,^{139,163,238,279–283} but not in CSF in other cases.^284,285 However, all these SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion data in humans are obtained on the final outcome, but no time-course data. Overall, it is critical to select an appropriate animal model to better understand SARS-CoV-2 nerve invasion mechanism.

Conclusion and perspectives

Although SARS-CoV-2 mainly causes pulmonary disorders, growing evidence demonstrate the possible neuroinvasion by SARS-CoV-2, as evidenced by isolating SARS-CoV-2 from CSF, SARS-CoV-2 discovery in the olfactory system, and various neurologic symptoms in patients with COVID-19. COVID-19 patients have been reported to exhibit CNS and PNS complications, including cerebrovascular diseases, encephalitis and meningitis, encephalopathy, anosmia and ageusia, Guillain-Barré syndrome, hypoxemia, and skeletal muscular symptoms. However, it is challenging to identify whether CNS symptoms resulted from CNS infection rather than peripheral origin due to hypoxia occurrence, blood clots, and cytokine storms in advanced patients. In addition, the SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion mechanism remains unclear. To date, the possible SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion mechanisms include invasion by the olfactory nerve, direct infection of vascular endothelial cells, and invasion through inducing inflammatory responses that disrupt the BBB. Indeed, other potential peripheral nerves, such as the trigeminal, vagus, and nasopharyngeal nerves, may also be potential routes for SARS-CoV-2 to reach the brain. All these pathways are associated with ACE2 or NRP1, therefore, the most effective approach to determine how SARS-CoV-2 invades CNS may be to identify the distributions of NRP1 and ACE2, as well as other possible receptors such as BSG in the human brain and the expression of these proteins in which brain cell types. This article summarized the possible SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasive mechanisms based on the research of SARS-CoV and autopsy studies of SARS-CoV-2 patients. However, SARS-COV-2 is more complex and transmissible than SARS, so studies on SARS are not entirely applicable to SARS-COV-2. At the same time, the almost insurmountable obstacle of autopsy reports is the relatively long postmortem interval, especially in a pandemic situation of COVID-19. Analysis of these autopsy samples is affected by the well-known autolysis of cells and tissues. Therefore, we must also consider other SARS-CoV-2 invasion mechanisms until conclusive pathological evidence is discovered. Although various in vitro and in vivo models were employed to study SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion, most animal models do not accurately predict SARS-CoV-2 infection in CNS due to different distributions and density of ACE2, NRP1, BSG, and TMPRSS2 between these models and the human brain. Protein data indicate that low TMPRSS2 and ACE2 levels are expressed in human CNS, while rodents and humanized mice exhibit higher levels than humans.^159,286 In addition, the value of using traditional immunohistochemistry analysis of brains from people who died due to COVID-19 may be limited. It may be effective to quantify the amounts of cells which express entry proteins. In short, more experimental studies are needed to unravel the precise neuroinvasion mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2, which may lead to find more efficient treatment strategies for these neurological complications.

Acknowledgements

Author contributions

Dandan Wan drafted the manuscript. Weiqi Hong illustrated the figures and tables for the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the article.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Contributor Information

Shuaiyao Lu, Email: moc.361@mk-oayiauhsul.

Xiaozhong Peng, Email: nc.ude.cmup@gnohzoaixgnep.

References

1. Jockusch S, et al. A library of nucleotide analogues terminate RNA synthesis catalyzed by polymerases of coronaviruses that cause SARS and COVID-19. Antivir. Res. 2020;180:104857. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

2. Zhu N, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:727–733. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

3. Andersen KG, et al. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 2020;26:450–452. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

4. Wu F, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020;579:265–269. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

5. Koralnik IJ, Tyler KL. COVID-19: a global threat to the nervous system. Ann. Neurol. 2020;88:1–11. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

6. Masters PS. The molecular biology of coronaviruses. Adv. virus Res. 2006;66:193–292. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

7. Nakagawa S, Miyazawa T. Correction to: genome evolution of SARS-CoV-2 and its virological characteristics. Inflamm. Regen. 2020;40:41. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

8. Lin Y, et al. Identification of an epitope of SARS-coronavirus nucleocapsid protein. Cell Res. 2003;13:141–145. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

9. Hoffmann M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271–280.e278. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

10. Sanclemente-Alaman I, et al. Experimental models for the study of central nervous system infection by SARS-CoV-2. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:2163. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

11. Yang N, Shen HM. Targeting the endocytic pathway and autophagy process as a novel therapeutic strategy in COVID-19. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020;16:1724–1731. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

12. Zou X, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front. Med. 2020;14:185–192. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

13. Alenina N, Bader M. ACE2 in brain physiology and pathophysiology: evidence from transgenic animal models. Neurochem. Res. 2019;44:1323–1329. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

14. Baig AM, Khaleeq A, Ali U, Syeda H. Evidence of the COVID-19 virus targeting the CNS: tissue distribution, host-virus interaction, and proposed neurotropic mechanisms. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020;11:995–998. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

15. Lukiw, W. J., Pogue, A. & Hill, J. M. SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and neurological targets in the brain. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 1–8 (2020). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract]

16. Paniz-Mondolfi A, et al. Central nervous system involvement by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:699–702. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

17. Wrapp D, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367:1260–1263. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

18. Gussow AB, et al. Genomic determinants of pathogenicity in SARS-CoV-2 and other human coronaviruses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:15193–15199. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

19. Yan R, et al. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science. 2020;367:1444–1448. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

20. Bhatraju PK, et al. Covid-19 in critically Ill patients in the Seattle region—case series. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2012–2022. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

21. Guan WJ, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1708–1720. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

22. Huang C, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

23. Acharya A, Kevadiya BD, Gendelman HE, Byrareddy SN. SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to neurological dysfunction. J. NeuroImmune Pharmacol. 2020;15:167–173. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

24. Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J. Autoimmun. 2020;109:102433. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

25. Abboud H, et al. COVID-19 and SARS-Cov-2 infection: pathophysiology and clinical effects on the nervous system. World Neurosurg. 2020;140:49–53. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

26. De Felice FG, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the central nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 2020;43:355–357. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

27. Li H, Xue Q, Xu X. Involvement of the nervous system in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Neurotox. Res. 2020;38:1–7. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

28. Pennisi M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and the nervous system: from clinical features to molecular mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:5475. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

29. Dubé M, et al. Axonal transport enables neuron-to-neuron propagation of human coronavirus OC43. J. Virol. 2018;92:e00404–18. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

30. Glass WG, Subbarao K, Murphy B, Murphy PM. Mechanisms of host defense following severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) pulmonary infection of mice. J. Immunol. 2004;173:4030–4039. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

31. Li K, et al. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus causes multiple organ damage and lethal disease in mice transgenic for human dipeptidyl peptidase 4. J. Infect. Dis. 2016;213:712–722. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

32. Marshall M. How COVID-19 can damage the brain. Nature. 2020;585:342–343. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

33. Pleasure SJ, Green AJ, Josephson SA. The spectrum of neurologic disease in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic infection: neurologists move to the frontlines. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77:679–680. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

34. Mao L, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan. China JAMA Neurol. 2020;77:683–690. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

35. Chen X, et al. A systematic review of neurological symptoms and complications of COVID-19. J. Neurol. 2021;268:392–402. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

36. Helms J, et al. Neurologic features in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2268–2270. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

37. Wang L, et al. Clinical manifestations and evidence of neurological involvement in 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurol. 2020;267:2777–2789. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

38. McAbee GN, et al. Encephalitis associated with COVID-19 infection in an 11-year-old child. Pediatr. Neurol. 2020;109:94. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

39. Moriguchi T, et al. A first case of meningitis/encephalitis associated with SARS-coronavirus-2. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;94:55–58. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

40. Remmelink M, et al. Unspecific post-mortem findings despite multiorgan viral spread in COVID-19 patients. Crit. Care. 2020;24:495. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

41. Li YC, Bai WZ, Hashikawa T. The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:552–555. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

42. Hamming I, et al. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J. Pathol. 2004;203:631–637. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

43. Cantuti-Castelvetri L, et al. Neuropilin-1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and infectivity. Science. 2020;370:856–860. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

44. Daly JL, et al. Neuropilin-1 is a host factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Science. 2020;370:861–865. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

45. Chen T, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ. 2020;368:m1091. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

46. Coutard B, et al. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antivir. Res. 2020;176:104742. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

47. Davies J, et al. Neuropilin-1 as a new potential SARS-CoV-2 infection mediator implicated in the neurologic features and central nervous system involvement of COVID-19. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020;22:4221–4226. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

48. Bryche B, et al. Massive transient damage of the olfactory epithelium associated with infection of sustentacular cells by SARS-CoV-2 in golden Syrian hamsters. Brain, Behav. Immun. 2020;89:579–586. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

49. Bilinska K, Jakubowska P, Von Bartheld CS, Butowt R. Expression of the SARS-CoV-2 entry proteins, ACE2 and TMPRSS2, in cells of the olfactory epithelium: identification of cell types and trends with age. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020;11:1555–1562. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

50. Sia SF, et al. Pathogenesis and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in golden hamsters. Nature. 2020;583:834–838. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

51. Zhang AJ, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infects and damages the mature and immature olfactory sensory neurons of hamsters. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021;73:e503–e512. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

52. Barnes BJ, et al. Targeting potential drivers of COVID-19: neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Exp. Med. 2020;217:e20200652. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

53. Lagunas-Rangel FA, Chávez-Valencia V. High IL-6/IFN-γ ratio could be associated with severe disease in COVID-19 patients. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:1789–1790. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

54. Mehta P, et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395:1033–1034. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

55. Zhao JY, Yan JY, Qu JM. Interpretations of “diagnosis and treatment protocol for novel coronavirus pneumonia (trial version 7)” Chin. Med. J. 2020;133:1347–1349. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

56. Kutlubaev MA. Clinical and pathogenetic aspects of nervous system impairments in COVID-19. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2020;120:130–136. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

57. Puccioni-Sohler M, et al. Current evidence of neurological features, diagnosis, and neuropathogenesis associated with COVID-19. Rev. da Soc. Brasileira de. Med. Tropical. 2020;53:e20200477. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

58. Ding H, et al. Neurologic manifestations of non hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. MedComm. 2020;1:253–256. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

59. Manousakis G, et al. The interface between stroke and infectious disease: infectious diseases leading to stroke and infections complicating stroke. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2009;9:28–34. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

60. Naveed M, Zhou QG, Han F. Cerebrovascular inflammation: a critical trigger for neurovascular injury? Neurochem. Int. 2019;126:165–177. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

61. Chua TH, Xu Z, King NKK. Neurological manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Inj. 2020;34:1549–1568. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

62. Favas TT, et al. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of proportions. Neurological Sci. 2020;41:3437–3470. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

63. Chen N, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395:507–513. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

64. Wang Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Qin Q. Unique epidemiological and clinical features of the emerging 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) implicate special control measures. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:568–576. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

65. Hernández-Fernández F, et al. Cerebrovascular disease in patients with COVID-19: neuroimaging, histological and clinical description. Brain: A. J. Neurol. 2020;143:3089–3103. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

66. Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J. Thrombosis Haemost. 2020;18:844–847. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

67. Prandoni P, et al. Residual vein thrombosis and serial D-dimer for the long-term management of patients with deep venous thrombosis. Thrombosis Res. 2017;154:35–41. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

68. Zheng J, et al. The clinical value of d-dimer level in patients with nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. World Neurosurg. 2018;114:e1161–e1167. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

69. Rowat AM, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM. Hypoxaemia in acute stroke is frequent and worsens outcome. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2006;21:166–172. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

70. Tang Y, et al. Genomic responses of the brain to ischemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage, kainate seizures, hypoglycemia, and hypoxia. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002;15:1937–1952. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

71. Li Y, et al. Acute cerebrovascular disease following COVID-19: a single center, retrospective, observational study. Stroke Vasc. Neurol. 2020;5:279–284. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

72. Beyrouti R, et al. Characteristics of ischaemic stroke associated with COVID-19. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2020;91:889–891. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

73. Morassi M, et al. Stroke in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: case series. J. Neurol. 2020;267:2185–2192. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

74. Sparr SA, Bieri PL. Infarction of the Splenium of the corpus callosum in the age of COVID-19: a snapshot in time. Stroke. 2020;51:e223–e226. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

75. Chen J, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 priming enhances the function of endothelial progenitor cells and their therapeutic efficacy. Hypertension. 2013;61:681–689. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

76. Anzalone N, et al. Multifocal laminar cortical brain lesions: a consistent MRI finding in neuro-COVID-19 patients. J. Neurol. 2020;267:2806–2809. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

77. Sharifi-Razavi A, Karimi N, Rouhani N. COVID-19 and intracerebral haemorrhage: causative or coincidental? N. Microbes N. Infect. 2020;35:100669. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

78. Al Saiegh F, et al. Status of SARS-CoV-2 in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with COVID-19 and stroke. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2020;91:846–848. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

79. Battaglini D, et al. Neurological manifestations of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: potential mechanisms and implications of individualized mechanical ventilation settings. Front. Neurol. 2020;11:845. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

80. Alshebri, M. S., Alshouimi, R. A., Alhumidi, H. A. & Alshaya, A. I. Neurological complications of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and COVID-19. SN Comprehens. Clin. Med. 1–11 (2020). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract]

81. Serrano-Serrano B, et al. Multifocal encephalitis as a neurological manifestation of COVID-19 infection. Revista de Neurologia. 2020;71:351–352. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

82. Xu Z, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020;8:420–422. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

83. Li YC, et al. Coronavirus infection of rat dorsal root ganglia: ultrastructural characterization of viral replication, transfer, and the early response of satellite cells. Virus Res. 2012;163:628–635. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

84. Wu Y, et al. Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020;87:18–22. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

85. Pedrosa, C. et al. Non-permissive SARS-CoV-2 infection in human neurospheres. Stem Cell Res. 102436 (2021). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract]

86. Kholin AA, et al. Features of neurological manifestations of the COVID-19 in children and adults. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2020;120:114–120. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

87. Nath A, Smith B. Neurological complications of COVID-19: from bridesmaid to bride. Arquivos de. Neuro-psiquiatria. 2020;78:459–460. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

88. Reichard RR, et al. Neuropathology of COVID-19: a spectrum of vascular and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like pathology. Acta Neuropathologica. 2020;140:1–6. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

89. Radmanesh A, et al. COVID-19-associated diffuse leukoencephalopathy and microhemorrhages. Radiology. 2020;297:202040. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

90. Parihar J, Tripathi M, Dhamija RK. Seizures and epilepsy in times of corona virus disease 2019 pandemic. J. Epilepsy Res. 2020;10:3–7. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

91. Parauda SC, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in patients with COVID-19. J. Neurol. Sci. 2020;416:117019. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

92. Kantonen J, et al. Neuropathologic features of four autopsied COVID-19 patients. Brain Pathol. 2020;30:1012–1016. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

93. Padda, I., Khehra, N., Jaferi, U. & Parmar, M. S. The neurological complexities and prognosis of COVID-19. SN Comprehens. Clin. Med. 1–12 (2020). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract]

94. Vaira LA, Salzano G, Deiana G, De Riu G. Anosmia and ageusia: common findings in COVID-19 patients. Laryngoscope. 2020;130:1787. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

95. Spinato G, et al. Alterations in smell or taste in mildly symptomatic outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2020;323:2089–2090. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

96. Beltrán-Corbellini Á, et al. Acute-onset smell and taste disorders in the context of COVID-19: a pilot multicentre polymerase chain reaction based case-control study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020;27:1738–1741. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

97. Cherry G, et al. Loss of smell and taste: a new marker of COVID-19? Tracking reduced sense of smell during the coronavirus pandemic using search trends. Expert Rev. Anti-infective Ther. 2020;18:1165–1170. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

98. Lechien JR, et al. Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a multicenter European study. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2020;277:2251–2261. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

99. Roland LT, et al. Smell and taste symptom-based predictive model for COVID-19 diagnosis. Int. forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020;10:832–838. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

100. Agyeman AA, et al. Smell and taste dysfunction in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020;95:1621–1631. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

101. Meng X, Deng Y, Dai Z, Meng Z. COVID-19 and anosmia: a review based on up-to-date knowledge. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2020;41:102581. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

102. Vaira LA, et al. Validation of a self-administered olfactory and gustatory test for the remotely evaluation of COVID-19 patients in home quarantine. Head Neck. 2020;42:1570–1576. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

103. Krajewska J, Krajewski W, Zub K, Zatoński T. COVID-19 in otolaryngologist practice: a review of current knowledge. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2020;277:1885–1897. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

104. Özçelik Korkmaz M, Eğilmez OK, Özçelik MA, Güven M. Otolaryngological manifestations of hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2021;278:1675–1685. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

105. Wakerley BR, Yuki N. Infectious and noninfectious triggers in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2013;9:627–639. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

106. Zhao H, et al. Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection: causality or coincidence? Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:383–384. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

107. Alberti P, et al. Guillain-Barré syndrome related to COVID-19 infection. Neurol.(R.) Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflammation. 2020;7:e741. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

108. Toscano G, et al. Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2574–2576. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

109. Camdessanche JP, et al. COVID-19 may induce Guillain-Barré syndrome. Rev. Neurologique. 2020;176:516–518. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

110. Abu-Rumeileh S, et al. Guillain-Barré syndrome spectrum associated with COVID-19: an up-to-date systematic review of 73 cases. J. Neurol. 2021;268:1133–1170. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

111. Keddie S, et al. Epidemiological and cohort study finds no association between COVID-19 and Guillain-Barré syndrome. Brain: J. Neurol. 2021;144:682–693. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

112. Li Z, et al. Neurological manifestations of patients with COVID-19: potential routes of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion from the periphery to the brain. Front. Med. 2020;14:533–541. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

113. Tobin MJ, Laghi F, Jubran A. Why COVID-19 silent hypoxemia is baffling to physicians. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020;202:356–360. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

114. Ottestad, W., Seim, M. & Mæhlen, J. O. COVID-19 with silent hypoxemia. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 140, (2020). [Abstract]

115. Covino M, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in COVID-19 patients aged ≥80years. Geriatrics Gerontol. Int. 2020;20:704–708. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

116. Naughton SX, Raval U, Pasinetti GM. Potential novel role of COVID-19 in Alzheimer’s disease and preventative mitigation strategies. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2020;76:21–25. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

117. Nouri-Vaskeh M, et al. Dyspneic and non-dyspneic (silent) hypoxemia in COVID-19: possible neurological mechanism. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2020;198:106217. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

118. Cabello-Verrugio C, et al. Renin-angiotensin system: an old player with novel functions in skeletal muscle. Medicinal Res. Rev. 2015;35:437–463. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

119. Mehan WA, et al. Paraspinal myositis in patients with COVID-19 infection. Ajnr. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2020;41:1949–1952. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

120. Xu P, Sun GD, Li ZZ. Clinical characteristics of two human-to-human transmitted coronaviruses: corona virus disease 2019 vs. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;24:5797–5809. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

121. Lau HM, et al. The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on the physical profile and quality of life. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabilitation. 2005;86:1134–1140. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

122. Disser NP, et al. Musculoskeletal consequences of COVID-19. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2020;102:1197–1204. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

123. Desforges M, et al. Neuroinvasive and neurotropic human respiratory coronaviruses: potential neurovirulent agents in humans. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014;807:75–96. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

124. Baig AM, Sanders EC. Potential neuroinvasive pathways of SARS-CoV-2: deciphering the spectrum of neurological deficit seen in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:1845–1857. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

125. DosSantos MF, et al. Neuromechanisms of SARS-CoV-2: a review. Front. Neuroanat. 2020;14:37. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

126. Koyuncu OO, Hogue IB, Enquist LW. Virus infections in the nervous system. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13:379–393. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

127. Matías-Guiu J, et al. Should we expect neurological symptoms in the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic? Neurologia. 2020;35:170–175. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

128. Chen R, et al. The spatial and cell-type distribution of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in the human and mouse brains. Front. Neurol. 2020;11:573095. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

129. Nile SH, et al. COVID-19: pathogenesis, cytokine storm and therapeutic potential of interferons. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020;53:66–70. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

130. Al-Obaidi MMJ, et al. Disruption of the blood brain barrier is vital property of neurotropic viral infection of the central nervous system. Acta Virologica. 2018;62:16–27. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

131. Butowt R, Bilinska K. SARS-CoV-2: olfaction, brain infection, and the urgent need for clinical samples allowing earlier virus detection. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020;11:1200–1203. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

132. Harmer D, Gilbert M, Borman R, Clark KL. Quantitative mRNA expression profiling of ACE 2, a novel homologue of angiotensin converting enzyme. FEBS Lett. 2002;532:107–110. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

133. Doobay MF, et al. Differential expression of neuronal ACE2 in transgenic mice with overexpression of the brain renin-angiotensin system. Am. J. Physiol. Regulatory, Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2007;292:R373–R381. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

134. Xia H, Lazartigues E. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in the brain: properties and future directions. J. Neurochem. 2008;107:1482–1494. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

135. Xia H, Lazartigues E. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: central regulator for cardiovascular function. Curr. Hypertension Rep. 2010;12:170–175. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

136. Buzhdygan TP, et al. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alters barrier function in 2D static and 3D microfluidic in-vitro models of the human blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020;146:105131. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

137. Song E, et al. Neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in human and mouse brain. J. Exp. Med. 2021;218:e20202135. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

138. Yang L, et al. A Human pluripotent stem cell-based platform to study SARS-CoV-2 tropism and model virus infection in human cells and organoids. cell. stem cell. 2020;27:125–136.e127. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

139. Meinhardt J, et al. Olfactory transmucosal SARS-CoV-2 invasion as a port of central nervous system entry in individuals with COVID-19. Nat. Neurosci. 2021;24:168–175. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

140. Holshue ML, et al. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:929–936. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

141. Donoghue M, et al. A novel angiotensin-converting enzyme-related carboxypeptidase (ACE2) converts angiotensin I to angiotensin 1-9. Circulation Res. 2000;87:E1–E9. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

142. Bittmann S, et al. Simultaneous treatment of COVID-19 with serine protease inhibitor camostat and/or cathepsin L inhibitor? J. Clin. Med. Res. 2020;12:320–322. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

143. Simmons G, et al. Inhibitors of cathepsin L prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:11876–11881. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

144. Huang IC, et al. SARS coronavirus, but not human coronavirus NL63, utilizes cathepsin L to infect ACE2-expressing cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:3198–3203. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

145. Ou X, et al. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1620. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

146. Chen Z, et al. Function of HAb18G/CD147 in invasion of host cells by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Infect. Dis. 2005;191:755–760. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

147. Wang K, et al. CD147-spike protein is a novel route for SARS-CoV-2 infection to host cells. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020;5:283. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

148. Li YC, et al. Neurotropic virus tracing suggests a membranous-coating-mediated mechanism for transsynaptic communication. J. Comp. Neurol. 2013;521:203–212. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

149. Mora-Díaz JC, et al. Porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus: a review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019;6:53. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

150. García-García S, Cepeda S, Arrese I, Sarabia R. Letter: hemorrhagic conditions affecting the central nervous system in COVID-19 patients. Neurosurgery. 2020;87:E394–e396. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

151. Saleki K, Banazadeh M, Saghazadeh A, Rezaei N. The involvement of the central nervous system in patients with COVID-19. Rev. Neurosci. 2020;31:453–456. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

152. Siddiqui R, Khan NA. Proposed intranasal route for drug administration in the management of central nervous system manifestations of COVID-19. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020;11:1523–1524. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

153. Mao XY, Jin WL. The COVID-19 pandemic: consideration for brain infection. Neuroscience. 2020;437:130–131. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

154. Moran DT, Rowley JC, 3rd, Jafek BW, Lovell MA. The fine structure of the olfactory mucosa in man. J. Neurocytol. 1982;11:721–746. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

155. Iwai N, Zhou Z, Roop DR, Behringer RR. Horizontal basal cells are multipotent progenitors in normal and injured adult olfactory epithelium. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1298–1306. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

156. Liang F. Sustentacular cell enwrapment of olfactory receptor neuronal dendrites: an update. Genes. 2020;11:493. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

157. Chen M, et al. Elevated ACE-2 expression in the olfactory neuroepithelium: implications for anosmia and upper respiratory SARS-CoV-2 entry and replication. Eur. Respir. J. 2020;56:2001948. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

158. Barnett EM, Cassell MD, Perlman S. Two neurotropic viruses, herpes simplex virus type 1 and mouse hepatitis virus, spread along different neural pathways from the main olfactory bulb. Neuroscience. 1993;57:1007–1025. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

159. Netland J, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection causes neuronal death in the absence of encephalitis in mice transgenic for human ACE2. J. Virol. 2008;82:7264–7275. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

160. Chan JF, et al. Simulation of the clinical and pathological manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a golden Syrian hamster model: implications for disease pathogenesis and transmissibility. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71:2428–2446. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

161. Jiao L, et al. The olfactory route is a potential way for SARS-CoV-2 to invade the central nervous system of rhesus monkeys. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021;6:169. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

162. Bulfamante G, et al. First ultrastructural autoptic findings of SARS -Cov-2 in olfactory pathways and brainstem. Minerva Anestesiologica. 2020;86:678–679. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

163. Deffner F, et al. Histological evidence for the enteric nervous system and the choroid plexus as alternative routes of neuroinvasion by SARS-CoV2. Front. Neuroanat. 2020;14:596439. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

164. Coelho-Aguiar, J. et al. The Enteric Glial Network Acts in the Maintenance of Intestinal Homeostasis and in Intestinal Disorders (The Enteric Glial Network Acts in the Maintenance of Intestinal Homeostasis and in Intestinal Disorders, 2019).

165. Chen Y, et al. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the feces of COVID-19 patients. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:833–840. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

166. Lamers MM, et al. SARS-CoV-2 productively infects human gut enterocytes. Science. 2020;369:50–54. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

167. Parker CG, Dailey MJ, Phillips H, Davis EA. Central sensory-motor crosstalk in the neural gut-brain axis. Autonomic Neurosci.: Basic Clin. 2020;225:102656. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

168. Esposito G, et al. Can the enteric nervous system be an alternative entrance door in SARS-CoV2 neuroinvasion? Brain Behav. Immun. 2020;87:93–94. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

169. Ogier M, Andéol G, Sagui E, Dal Bo G. How to detect and track chronic neurologic sequelae of COVID-19? Use of auditory brainstem responses and neuroimaging for long-term patient follow-up. Brain Behav. Immun. Health. 2020;5:100081. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

170. Matsuda K, et al. The vagus nerve is one route of transneural invasion for intranasally inoculated influenza a virus in mice. Vet. Pathol. 2004;41:101–107. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

171. Ruchaya PJ, et al. Overexpression of AT2R in the solitary-vagal complex improves baroreflex in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Neuropeptides. 2016;60:29–36. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

172. Aoyagi Y, et al. Oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia following coronavirus disease 2019: a case report. Dysphagia. 2020;35:545–548. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

173. Iadecola C, Anrather J, Kamel H. Effects of COVID-19 on the nervous system. Cell. 2020;183:16–27.e11. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

174. Zubair AS, et al. Neuropathogenesis and neurologic manifestations of the coronaviruses in the age of coronavirus disease 2019: a review. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77:1018–1027. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

175. Magro C, et al. Complement associated microvascular injury and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 infection: a report of five cases. Transl. Res.: J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2020;220:1–13. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

176. Lang M, et al. Hypoxaemia related to COVID-19: vascular and perfusion abnormalities on dual-energy CT. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020;20:1365–1366. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

177. Puelles VG, et al. Multiorgan and renal tropism of SARS-CoV-2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:590–592. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

178. Wang Y, et al. Neuropilin-1 modulates interferon-γ-stimulated signaling in brain microvascular endothelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 2016;129:3911–3921. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

179. Varga Z, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395:1417–1418. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

180. Monteil V, et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infections in engineered human tissues using clinical-grade soluble human ACE2. Cell. 2020;181:905–913.e907. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

181. Banerjee S, Bhat MA. Neuron-glial interactions in blood-brain barrier formation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007;30:235–258. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

182. Hawkins BT, Davis TP. The blood-brain barrier/neurovascular unit in health and disease. Pharmacol. Rev. 2005;57:173–185. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

183. Cabirac GF, et al. In vitro interaction of coronaviruses with primate and human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1995;380:79–88. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

184. Pellegrini L, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects the brain choroid plexus and disrupts the blood-CSF barrier in human brain organoids. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:951–961.e955. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

185. Kempuraj D, et al. COVID-19, mast cells, cytokine storm, psychological stress, and neuroinflammation. Neuroscientist. 2020;26:402–414. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

186. Ye Q, Wang B, Mao J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the ‘Cytokine Storm’ in COVID-19. J. Infect. 2020;80:607–613. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

187. Sun X, et al. Cytokine storm intervention in the early stages of COVID-19 pneumonia. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020;53:38–42. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

188. Coperchini F, et al. The cytokine storm in COVID-19: an overview of the involvement of the chemokine/chemokine-receptor system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020;53:25–32. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

189. Chi Y, et al. Serum cytokine and chemokine profile in relation to the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;222:746–754. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

190. Miner JJ, Diamond MS. Mechanisms of restriction of viral neuroinvasion at the blood-brain barrier. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2016;38:18–23. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

191. Li Y, Fu L, Gonzales DM, Lavi E. Coronavirus neurovirulence correlates with the ability of the virus to induce proinflammatory cytokine signals from astrocytes and microglia. J. Virol. 2004;78:3398–3406. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

192. Bohmwald K, Gálvez NMS, Ríos M, Kalergis AM. Neurologic alterations due to respiratory virus infections. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018;12:386. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

193. Yin XX, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a vital target for brain inflammation during the COVID-19 outbreak. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020;11:1704–1705. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

194. Krum JM, Rosenstein JM. VEGF mRNA and its receptor flt-1 are expressed in reactive astrocytes following neural grafting and tumor cell implantation in the adult CNS. Exp. Neurol. 1998;154:57–65. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

195. Papavassiliou E, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (vascular permeability factor) expression in injured rat brain. J. Neurosci. Res. 1997;49:451–460. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

196. Bartholdi D, Rubin BP, Schwab ME. VEGF mRNA induction correlates with changes in the vascular architecture upon spinal cord damage in the rat. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1997;9:2549–2560. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

197. Kong Y, et al. VEGF-D: a novel biomarker for detection of COVID-19 progression. Crit. Care. 2020;24:373. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

198. Vaduganathan M, et al. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1653–1659. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

199. Polidoro RB, Hagan RS, de Santis Santiago R, Schmidt NW. Overview: systemic inflammatory response derived from lung injury caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection explains severe outcomes in COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:1626. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

200. Uciechowski P, Dempke WCM. Interleukin-6: a masterplayer in the cytokine network. Oncology. 2020;98:131–137. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

201. Moore JB, June CH. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science. 2020;368:473–474. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

202. Herold T, et al. Elevated levels of IL-6 and CRP predict the need for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020;146:128–136.e124. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

203. Chan JF, et al. Differential cell line susceptibility to the emerging novel human betacoronavirus 2c EMC/2012: implications for disease pathogenesis and clinical manifestation. J. Infect. Dis. 2013;207:1743–1752. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

204. Swearengen JR. Choosing the right animal model for infectious disease research. Anim. Models Exp. Med. 2018;1:100–108. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

205. Wan Y, et al. Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from Wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS coronavirus. J. Virol. 2020;94:e00127–20. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

206. Song Z, et al. From SARS to MERS, thrusting coronaviruses into the spotlight. Viruses. 2019;11:59. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

207. Ramani A, et al. SARS-CoV-2 targets neurons of 3D human brain organoids. EMBO J. 2020;39:e106230. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

208. De Kleijn KMA, et al. Reappraisal of human HOG and MO3.13 cell lines as a model to study oligodendrocyte functioning. Cells. 2019;8:1096. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

209. Post GR, Dawson G. Characterization of a cell line derived from a human oligodendroglioma. Mol. Chem. Neuropathol. 1992;16:303–317. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

210. Benda P, et al. Differentiated rat glial cell strain in tissue culture. Science. 1968;161:370–371. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

211. Gao J, Hu L, Peng HH, Shi JG. The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the rat C6 glioma cell line. Mitochondrial DNA. Part A. 2016;27:2188–2189. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

212. Yamashita M, Yamate M, Li GM, Ikuta K. Susceptibility of human and rat neural cell lines to infection by SARS-coronavirus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;334:79–85. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

213. Arbour N, Talbot PJ. Persistent infection of neural cell lines by human coronaviruses. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1998;440:575–581. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

214. Arbour N, et al. Acute and persistent infection of human neural cell lines by human coronavirus OC43. J. Virol. 1999;73:3338–OC3350. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

215. Favreau DJ, Meessen-Pinard M, Desforges M, Talbot PJ. Human coronavirus-induced neuronal programmed cell death is cyclophilin d dependent and potentially caspase dispensable. J. Virol. 2012;86:81–93. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

216. Lachance C, Arbour N, Cashman NR, Talbot PJ. Involvement of aminopeptidase N (CD13) in infection of human neural cells by human coronavirus 229E. J. Virol. 1998;72:6511–6519. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

217. Meessen-Pinard M, Le Coupanec A, Desforges M, Talbot PJ. Pivotal role of receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 and mixed lineage kinase domain-like in neuronal cell death induced by the human neuroinvasive coronavirus OC43. J. Virol. 2017;91:e01513–16. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

218. St-Jean JR, Desforges M, Talbot PJ. Genetic evolution of human coronavirus OC43 in neural cell culture. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2006;581:499–502. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

219. Bonavia A, Arbour N, Yong VW, Talbot PJ. Infection of primary cultures of human neural cells by human coronaviruses 229E and OC43. J. Virol. 1997;71:800–806. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

220. Talbot PJ, et al. Neurotropism of human coronavirus 229E. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1993;342:339–346. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

221. Dutta D, Heo I, Clevers H. Disease modeling in stem cell-derived 3D organoid systems. Trends Mol. Med. 2017;23:393–410. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

222. Rossi G, Manfrin A, Lutolf MP. Progress and potential in organoid research. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018;19:671–687. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

223. Busquet F, et al. Harnessing the power of novel animal-free test methods for the development of COVID-19 drugs and vaccines. Arch. Toxicol. 2020;94:2263–2272. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

224. Takayama K. In vitro and animal models for SARS-CoV-2 research. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;41:513–517. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

225. Liu Y, et al. Divergence between serum creatine and cystatin C in estimating glomerular filtration rate of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Ren. Fail. 2021;43:1104–1114. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

226. Fan Z, et al. Clinical features of COVID-19-related liver functional abnormality. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;18:1561–1566. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

227. Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY, Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020;17:259–260. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

228. Zhou J, et al. Infection of bat and human intestinal organoids by SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1077–1083. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

229. Han, Y. et al. Identification of candidate COVID-19 therapeutics using hPSC-derived lung organoids. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2020.05.05.079095 (2020).

230. Zhao B, et al. Recapitulation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and cholangiocyte damage with human liver ductal organoids. Protein Cell. 2020;11:771–775. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

231. Gomez-Pinedo U, et al. Is the brain a reservoir organ for SARS-CoV2? J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:2354–2355. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

232. Bullen CK, et al. Infectability of human BrainSphere neurons suggests neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2. Altex. 2020;37:665–671. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

233. Mesci, P. et al. Sofosbuvir protects human brain organoids against SARS-CoV-2. (2020).

234. Bhatia HK, Singh H, Grewal N, Natt NK. Sofosbuvir: a novel treatment option for chronic hepatitis C infection. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacotherapeut. 2014;5:278–284. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

235. Song E, et al. Neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in human and mouse brain. J. Exp. Med. 2021;218:e20202135. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

236. Damas J, et al. Broad host range of SARS-CoV-2 predicted by comparative and structural analysis of ACE2 in vertebrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:22311–22322. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

237. Alexandersen S, Chamings A, Bhatta TR. SARS-CoV-2 genomic and subgenomic RNAs in diagnostic samples are not an indicator of active replication. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:6059. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

238. Nuovo GJ, et al. Endothelial cell damage is the central part of COVID-19 and a mouse model induced by injection of the S1 subunit of the spike protein. Ann. Diagnostic Pathol. 2021;51:151682. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

239. Leist SR, et al. A mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 induces acute lung injury and mortality in standard laboratory mice. Cell. 2020;183:1070–1085.e1012. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

240. Muñoz-Fontela C, et al. Animal models for COVID-19. Nature. 2020;586:509–515. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

241. Butowt, R. & von Bartheld, C. S. Anosmia in COVID-19: underlying mechanisms and assessment of an olfactory route to brain infection. Neuroscientist 1073858420956905 (2020). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract]

242. Harker JA, Johansson C. Rapidly deployable mouse models of SARS-CoV-2 infection add flexibility to the COVID-19 toolbox. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2021;64:7–9. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

243. Oladunni FS, et al. Lethality of SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18 human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 transgenic mice. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:6122. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

244. Rathnasinghe R, et al. Comparison of transgenic and adenovirus hACE2 mouse models for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020;9:2433–2445. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

245. Bao L, et al. The pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 transgenic mice. Nature. 2020;583:830–833. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

246. Hassan AO, et al. A SARS-CoV-2 infection model in mice demonstrates protection by neutralizing antibodies. Cell. 2020;182:744–753.e744. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

247. Sun SH, et al. A mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:124–133.e124. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

248. Zhou B, et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike D614G change enhances replication and transmission. Nature. 2021;592:122–127. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

249. Carossino, M. et al. Fatal neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in K18-hACE2 mice is partially dependent on hACE2 expression. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.13.425144v3.full (2021).

250. Golden JW, et al. Human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 transgenic mice infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop severe and fatal respiratory disease. JCI Insight. 2020;5:e142032. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

251. Jiang RD, et al. Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in transgenic mice expressing human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Cell. 2020;182:50–58. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

252. Kumari P, et al. Neuroinvasion and encephalitis following intranasal inoculation of SARS-CoV-2 in K18-hACE2 mice. Viruses. 2021;13:132. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

253. Winkler ES, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection of human ACE2-transgenic mice causes severe lung inflammation and impaired function. Nat. Immunol. 2020;21:1327–1335. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

254. Zheng J, et al. COVID-19 treatments and pathogenesis including anosmia in K18-hACE2 mice. Nature. 2021;589:603–607. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

255. Barnett EM, et al. Anterograde tracing of trigeminal afferent pathways from the murine tooth pulp to cortex using herpes simplex virus type 1. J. Neurosci. 1995;15:2972–2984. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

256. Butler N, Pewe L, Trandem K, Perlman S. Murine encephalitis caused by HCoV-OC43, a human coronavirus with broad species specificity, is partly immune-mediated. Virology. 2006;347:410–421. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

257. Le Coupanec A, et al. Potential differences in cleavage of the S protein and type-1 interferon together control human coronavirus infection, propagation, and neuropathology within the central nervous system. J. Virol. 2021;95:e00140–21. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

258. van Riel D, Verdijk R, Kuiken T. The olfactory nerve: a shortcut for influenza and other viral diseases into the central nervous system. J. Pathol. 2015;235:277–287. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

259. Cooper KW, et al. COVID-19 and the chemical senses: supporting players take center stage. Neuron. 2020;107:219–233. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

260. de Melo GD, et al. COVID-19-related anosmia is associated with viral persistence and inflammation in human olfactory epithelium and brain infection in hamsters. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021;13:eabf8396. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

261. Imai M, et al. Syrian hamsters as a small animal model for SARS-CoV-2 infection and countermeasure development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:16587–16595. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

262. Hoagland DA, et al. Leveraging the antiviral type I interferon system as a first line of defense against SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity. Immunity. 2021;54:557–570.e555. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

263. Zhang Q, et al. H7N9 influenza viruses are transmissible in ferrets by respiratory droplet. Science. 2013;341:410–414. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

264. van den Brand JM, et al. Pathology of experimental SARS coronavirus infection in cats and ferrets. Vet. Pathol. 2008;45:551–562. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

265. Chu YK, et al. The SARS-CoV ferret model in an infection-challenge study. Virology. 2008;374:151–163. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

266. Everett HE, et al. Intranasal infection of ferrets with SARS-CoV-2 as a model for asymptomatic human infection. Viruses. 2021;13:113. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

267. Schlottau K, et al. SARS-CoV-2 in fruit bats, ferrets, pigs, and chickens: an experimental transmission study. Lancet Microbe. 2020;1:e218–e225. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

268. Shi J, et al. Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals to SARS-coronavirus 2. Science. 2020;368:1016–1020. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

269. Richard M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted via contact and via the air between ferrets. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3496. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

270. Kim YI, et al. Infection and rapid transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in ferrets. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27:704–709.e702. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

271. Gong SR, Bao LL. The battle against SARS and MERS coronaviruses: reservoirs and Animal Models. Anim. Models Exp. Med. 2018;1:125–133. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

272. Yu P, et al. Age-related rhesus macaque models of COVID-19. Anim. Models Exp. Med. 2020;3:93–97. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

273. Gretebeck LM, Subbarao K. Animal models for SARS and MERS coronaviruses. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2015;13:123–129. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

274. Deng W, et al. Ocular conjunctival inoculation of SARS-CoV-2 can cause mild COVID-19 in rhesus macaques. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4400. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

275. Munster VJ, et al. Respiratory disease in rhesus macaques inoculated with SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 2020;585:268–272. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

276. Rockx B, et al. Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model. Science. 2020;368:1012–1015. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

277. Hartman AL, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection of African green monkeys results in mild respiratory disease discernible by PET/CT imaging and shedding of infectious virus from both respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008903. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

278. Philippens, I. H. C. H. M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 causes brain inflammation and induces Lewy body formation in macaques. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.23.432474v1 (2021).

279. Burks SM, et al. Can SARS-CoV-2 infect the central nervous system via the olfactory bulb or the blood-brain barrier? Brain, Behav. Immun. 2021;95:7–14. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

280. Ellul MA, et al. Neurological associations of COVID-19. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:767–783. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

281. Liu JM, et al. Evidence of central nervous system infection and neuroinvasive routes, as well as neurological involvement, in the lethality of SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Med. Virol. 2021;93:1304–1313. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

282. Matschke J, et al. Neuropathology of patients with COVID-19 in Germany: a post-mortem case series. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:919–929. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

283. Serrano, G. E. et al. Mapping of SARS-CoV-2 brain invasion and histopathology in COVID-19 disease. Preprint at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.15.21251511v1 (2021).

284. Neumann B, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid findings in COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms. J. Neurol. Sci. 2020;418:117090. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

285. Placantonakis DG, et al. SARS-CoV-2 is not detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of encephalopathic COVID-19 patients. Front. Neurol. 2020;11:587384. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

286. Tseng CT, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection of mice transgenic for the human Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 virus receptor. J. Virol. 2007;81:1162–1173. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

287. Tm A, et al. A first case of meningitis/encephalitis associated with SARS-Coronavirus-2. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;94:55–58. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

288. Alsolami A, Shiley K. Successful treatment of influenza-associated acute necrotizing encephalitis in an adult using high-dose oseltamivir and methylprednisolone: case report and literature review. Open forum infectious diseases. 2017;4:ofx145. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

289. Poyiadji N, et al. COVID-19-associated acute hemorrhagic necrotizing encephalopathy: CT and MRI features. Radiology. 2020;296:E119–E120. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

290. Llansó, L. & Urra, X. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in COVID-19 disease: a case-report. SN Comprehensive Clin. Med. 1–3 (2020). [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract]

291. Anand P, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: two cases and a review of the literature. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2020;29:105212. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

292. Zanin L, et al. SARS-CoV-2 can induce brain and spine demyelinating lesions. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2020;162:1491–1494. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

293. Kumar AJ, et al. Behavioral, cognitive and histological changes following neonatal anoxia: male and female rats’ differences at adolescent age. Int. J. Developmental Neurosci. 2019;73:50–58. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

294. Ren L, et al. Influenza A virus (H1N1) triggers a hypoxic response by stabilizing hypoxia-inducible factor-1α via inhibition of proteasome. Virology. 2019;530:51–58. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

295. Wang GL, Jiang BH, Rue EA, Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular O2 tension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:5510–5514. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

296. Sohal S, Mansur M. COVID-19 presenting with seizures. IDCases. 2020;20:e00782. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

297. Wang D, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2020;323:1061–1069. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

298. Mizuguchi M, Yamanouchi H, Ichiyama T, Shiomi M. Acute encephalopathy associated with influenza and other viral infections. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum. 2007;186:45–56. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

299. Dobbs MR. Toxic encephalopathy. Semin. Neurol. 2011;31:184–193. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

300. Giacomelli A, et al. Self-reported olfactory and taste disorders in patients with severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 infection: a cross-sectional study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71:889–890. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

301. Dixon L, et al. COVID-19-related acute necrotizing encephalopathy with brain stem involvement in a patient with aplastic anemia. Neurology(R) Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2020;7:e789. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

302. Hepburn M, et al. Acute symptomatic seizures in critically Ill patients with COVID-19: is there an association? Neurocritical Care. 2021;34:139–143. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

303. Vellozzi C, Iqbal S, Broder K. Guillain-Barre syndrome, influenza, and influenza vaccination: the epidemiologic evidence. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014;58:1149–1155. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

304. Iyer NV, et al. Cellular and developmental control of O₂ homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. Genes Dev. 1998;12:149–162. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

305. Duette G, et al. Induction of HIF-1α by HIV-1 infection in CD4(+) T cells promotes viral replication and drives extracellular vesicle-mediated inflammation. mBio. 2018;9:e00757–18. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

306. Mazzon M, et al. A mechanism for induction of a hypoxic response by vaccinia virus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:12444–12449. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

307. Lindahl SGE. Using the prone position could help to combat the development of fast hypoxia in some patients with COVID-19. Acta Paediatrica. 2020;109:1539–1544. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

308. Nagel MA, Mahalingam R, Cohrs RJ, Gilden D. Virus vasculopathy and stroke: an under-recognized cause and treatment target. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets. 2010;10:105–111. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

309. Gilden DH, et al. Varicella zoster virus, a cause of waxing and waning vasculitis: the New England Journal of Medicine case 5-1995 revisited. Neurology. 1996;47:1441–1446. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

310. Miller EC, Elkind MS. Infection and stroke: an update on recent progress. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2016;16:2. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

311. Klok FA, et al. Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. Thrombosis Res. 2020;191:145–147. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

312. Gutiérrez-Ortiz C, et al. Miller Fisher syndrome and polyneuritis cranialis in COVID-19. Neurology. 2020;95:e601–e605. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

313. Pfefferkorn T, et al. Acute polyradiculoneuritis with locked-in syndrome in a patient with Covid-19. J. Neurol. 2020;267:1883–1884. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

314. Poissy J, et al. Pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19: awareness of an increased prevalence. Circulation. 2020;142:184–186. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

315. Willyard C. Coronavirus blood-clot mystery intensifies. Nature. 2020;581:250. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

316. Fogarty H, et al. More on COVID-19 coagulopathy in Caucasian patients. Br. J. Haematol. 2020;189:1060–1061. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

317. MacLean MA, Kamintsky L, Leck ED, Friedman A. The potential role of microvascular pathology in the neurological manifestations of coronavirus infection. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2020;17:55. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

318. Desforges M, et al. Human coronaviruses: viral and cellular factors involved in neuroinvasiveness and neuropathogenesis. Virus Res. 2014;194:145–158. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

319. Tremblay ME, et al. Neuropathobiology of COVID-19: the role for glia. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020;14:592214. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

320. Vazana U, et al. Glutamate-mediated blood-brain barrier opening: implications for neuroprotection and drug delivery. J. Neurosci. 2016;36:7727–7739. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

321. Merkler, A. E. et al. Risk of ischemic stroke in patients with Covid-19 versus patients with influenza. Preprint at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.18.20105494v1 (2020).

322. Mollica V, Rizzo A, Massari F. The pivotal role of TMPRSS2 in coronavirus disease 2019 and prostate cancer. Future Oncol. 2020;16:2029–2033. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

323. Qiao J, et al. The expression of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 and CD147, and protease TMPRSS2 in human and mouse brain cells and mouse brain tissues. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;533:867–871. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

324. Singh KD, Karnik SS. Angiotensin receptors: structure, function, signaling and clinical applications. J. Cell Signal. 2016;1:111. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

325. Krasniqi S, Daci A. Role of the angiotensin pathway and its target therapy in epilepsy management. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:726. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

326. Gurwitz D. Angiotensin receptor blockers as tentative SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics. Drug Dev. Res. 2020;81:537–540. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]