Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


As physical barriers, epithelia must preserve their integrity when challenged by mechanical stresses. Cell-cell junctions linked to the cortical cytoskeleton play key roles in this process, often with mechanotransduction mechanisms that reinforce tissues. Caveolae are mechanosensitive organelles that buffer tension via disassembly. Loss of caveolae, through caveolin-1 or cavin1 depletion, causes activation of PtdIns(4, 5)P2 signaling, recruitment of FMNL2 formin, and enhanced-cortical actin assembly. How this equates to physiological responses in epithelial cells containing endogenous caveolae is unknown. Here we examined the effect of mechanically inducing acute disassembly of caveolae in epithelia. We show that perturbation of caveolae, through direct mechanical stress, reinforces the actin cortex at adherens junctions. Increasing interactions with membrane lipids by introducing multiple phosphatidylserine-binding undecad cavin1 (UC1) repeat domains into cavin1 rendered caveolae more stable to mechanical stimuli. This molecular stabilization blocked cortical reinforcement in response to mechanical stress. Cortical reinforcement elicited by the mechanically induced disassembly of caveolae increased epithelial resilience against tensile stresses. These findings identify the actin cortex as a target of caveola mechanotransduction that contributes to epithelial integrity.

Free full text 


Logo of mbcLink to Publisher's site
Mol Biol Cell. 2023 Nov 1; 34(12): ar120.
Published online 2023 Oct 31. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E23-05-0163
PMCID: PMC10846620
PMID: 37672337
A Highlights from MBoC Selection

Caveola mechanotransduction reinforces the cortical cytoskeleton to promote epithelial resilience

Alex Dunn, Monitoring Editor
Stanford University

Abstract

As physical barriers, epithelia must preserve their integrity when challenged by mechanical stresses. Cell–cell junctions linked to the cortical cytoskeleton play key roles in this process, often with mechanotransduction mechanisms that reinforce tissues. Caveolae are mechanosensitive organelles that buffer tension via disassembly. Loss of caveolae, through caveolin-1 or cavin1 depletion, causes activation of PtdIns(4, 5)P2 signaling, recruitment of FMNL2 formin, and enhanced-cortical actin assembly. How this equates to physiological responses in epithelial cells containing endogenous caveolae is unknown. Here we examined the effect of mechanically inducing acute disassembly of caveolae in epithelia. We show that perturbation of caveolae, through direct mechanical stress, reinforces the actin cortex at adherens junctions. Increasing interactions with membrane lipids by introducing multiple phosphatidylserine-binding undecad cavin1 (UC1) repeat domains into cavin1 rendered caveolae more stable to mechanical stimuli. This molecular stabilization blocked cortical reinforcement in response to mechanical stress. Cortical reinforcement elicited by the mechanically induced disassembly of caveolae increased epithelial resilience against tensile stresses. These findings identify the actin cortex as a target of caveola mechanotransduction that contributes to epithelial integrity.

INTRODUCTION

Epithelia forms many of the biological barriers of the metazoan body. They mediate regulated secretion and absorption and also protect the body from its external environment. Central to this physiological function is the integrity of cell–cell cohesion, which is mediated by multiple specialized intercellular junctions, where cell–cell adhesion systems are linked to elements of the cytoskeleton. For example, in adherens junctions (AJ), the E-cadherin complex physically and functionally engages with the actomyosin cytoskeleton (Mège and Ishiyama, 2017; Charras and Yap, 2018), whereas in desmosomes, desmogleins and desmocollins associate with the intermediate filament cytoskeleton (Delva et al., 2009).

Ultimately, these adhesion systems must preserve epithelial integrity by resisting mechanical forces that can disrupt cell–cell cohesion. These disruptive forces can be applied from outside the tissue, as is associated with physical trauma or pulmonary inflation (Zhong et al., 2020), or arise from within the tissue, when the actomyosin cytoskeletons of epithelial cells contract against the AJ that connect cells together (reviewed in (Charras and Yap, 2018). To cope with these challenges, epithelial tissues have evolved a variety of mechanisms to both sense and respond to mechanical forces (Pokutta et al., 2002; Yonemura et al., 2010; Choi et al., 2012; Huveneers et al., 2012; Yao et al., 2014; Spadaro et al., 2017; Haas et al., 2020). For example, the cadherin molecular complex in AJ contains mechanosensitive elements, such as the adhesive-binding domain of E-cadherin, the cytosolic adapter protein, α-catenin, and the cadherin-associated protein, Myosin VI. Mechanical forces transmitted via E-cadherin can induce conformational changes in α-catenin to promote vinculin and F-actin binding (reviewed in Noordstra et al., 2023), while recruitment of Myosin VI engages a signal-transduction apparatus that activates RhoA at AJ (Acharya et al., 2018).

Caveolae constitute another important means of mechanoprotection, being particularly abundant in tissues which experience significant mechanical forces. Caveolae consist of plasma membrane (PM) invaginations that are created when caveolin (Cav) integral-membrane proteins engage with cytosolic-cavin coat proteins. Caveolae are distributed at sites of cell–cell contact (Volontè et al., 1999; Palacios et al., 2002; Lu et al., 2003; Orlichenko et al., 2009) and are clustered at AJs in epithelial cells (Teo et al., 2020). Caveola mechanosensing is currently understood to be mediated by the disassembly of cavins, leading to the partial or complete flattening of caveolae (Sinha et al., 2011). Caveola-deficient animals are prone to injury due to mechanical stress, as has been observed in the notochord of cavin 1b-deficient zebrafish embryos (Garcia et al., 2017; Lim et al., 2017), in endothelia (Cheng et al., 2015), and in skeletal muscle (Lo et al., 2016). The best-understood mechanism for mechanoprotection involves the release of membrane when caveolae disassemble, which serves to buffer against increases in membrane tension (Cheng et al., 2015; Lo et al., 2016; Rog-Zielinska et al., 2021).

But caveolae can also interact with the actin cytoskeleton (Echarri and Del Pozo, 2015) and modulate cell signalling to reorganise the cytoskeleton (Radel and Rizzo, 2005; Teo et al., 2020) and RhoA-dependent contractility (Grande-García et al., 2007; Goetz et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2011; Hetmanski et al., 2019). Previously, we showed that chronic depletion of caveolae, by RNAi directed against either CAV1 or cavin1, causes increased cortical tension in epithelial monolayers through a pathway involving PtdIns(4, 5)P2, the formin-like protein FMNL2, and the actin cytoskeleton (Teo et al., 2020). However, it was unclear whether this pathway contributed to a physiological role for caveolae when they disassembled in response to mechanical stimulation. Accordingly, in this study we sought to test whether cortical regulation is affected when mechanosensing induces the acute disassembly of caveolae, and defined the role that this may play in epithelial mechanoprotection. Developing a new molecular strategy to stabilize caveolae, we show that mechanically induced caveolar disassembly promotes reinforcement of the actomyosin cortex, rapidly altering the mechanical profile of epithelial monolayers to confer resistance to physical insults.

RESULTS

Mechanical stresses reinforce the junctional cytoskeleton in a caveola-dependent manner

To investigate how caveola mechanosensing might affect the cortical cytoskeleton, we applied hypoosmotic stimulation to confluent MCF-10A mammary epithelial monolayers. Hypoosmotic stress is a commonly used manoeuvre that induces the release of cavins from caveola by increasing membrane tension as cells swell (Sinha et al., 2011). Monolayers were exposed to growth media with an osmolarity of 150 mOsm L–1 (~50% that of physiological conditions) for 5 min. Immunofluorescence (IF) analysis showed that this reduced-junctional staining for cavin1 (relative to the cytoplasmic signal) without affecting Cav-1 localization, consistent with a disassembly of caveolae (Figure S1a–e).

Under baseline conditions, control MCF-10A monolayers displayed prominent F-actin (phalloidin) staining at cell–cell junctions, as well as basal-stress fibers and cytoplasmic networks elsewhere in the cell. Quantitation of fluorescence intensity demonstrated that the F-actin pool at cell–cell junctions was reversibly increased by ~20% upon short-term application of hypoosmotic media (Figure 1, a and b and Supplemental Figure S2a). This cortical response required caveolae, because Cav-1 shRNA knockdown (KD), monolayers had increased junctional F-actin at baseline, as previously reported (Teo et al., 2020), but this did not increase upon hypoosmotic stimulation. These differences were specific for Cav-1, as they were restored upon reconstitution of KD cells with exogenous Cav-1 (KDR; Figure 1, a and b and Supplemental Figure S2a). Maximum-projection views also suggested that F-actin became less prominent in the basal- and cytoplasmic pools upon hypoosmotic stimulation, compared with that at junctions. This was confirmed by comparing the ratio of F-actin fluorescence at junctions with that elsewhere in the cells (Figure 1c). The junctional:nonjunctional F-actin ratio increased by 35% upon hypoosmotic stimulation in WT monolayers. In Cav-1 KD monolayers, the baseline ratio was elevated by ~44%, but did not increase with hypoosmotic shock. Reconstitution of Cav-1 in KD cells (KDR) returned their response to resemble that of WT monolayers, with an increase of ~56% following hypoosmotic shock, indicating this is a caveola-dependent phenomenon. Myosin IIA was most prominent at the basal regions of control cells before hypoosmotic stimulation and increased at junctions upon stimulation (Figure 1d). However, this increase in junctional Myosin IIA was not affected by Cav-1 KD, suggesting that it was due to a caveola-independent effect of hypoosmotic stimulation.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mbc-34-ar120-g001.jpg

The cytoskeleton at AJ is reinforced by mechanical stimulation of caveolae. a) Fluorescence imaging of F-actin in WT, Cav-1 knock-down (KD), and Cav-1 KD-reconstituted (KDR) MCF-10A monolayers (scale bar = 10 μm). b) Quantification of (a) showing the percentage change in cortical F-actin levels following hypoosmotic shock, as analyzed by a change in fluorescence intensity. F-actin in WT monolayers was increased by ~20% (p ≤ 0.0001), Cav-1 KD ~7% (p = 0.0125), and Cav-1 KDR ~31% (p ≤ 0.0001). c) Analysis of the junctional to nonjunctional F-actin ratio. d) IF imaging of nonmuscle myosin II (NMII) type A in WT and Cav-1 KD MCF-10A monolayers after hypoosmotic shock and following a 1 h recovery period in isoosmotic growth media. e) Fluorescence imaging of F-actin in WT and Cav-1 KD MCF-10A monolayers before, and following, 10% mechanical stretch (scale bar = 10 μm). f) Quantification of (d) shows that cortical F-actin is increased by ~27 and ~4% in WT (p ≤ 0.0001) and Cav-1 KD (p = 0.02238) monolayers following stretch, respectively, as analyzed by a change in fluorescence intensity. All data are means ± SD. Statistical analyses (b, f) calculated from N = 3 independent experiments (60 junctions per experiment) using unpaired t tests. Statistical analysis (c) calculated from N = 3 independent experiments (17 junctions for experiment) using unpaired t tests. Points on graphs represent individual cell junctions. ns, not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

We next tested whether other mechanical stresses that impinge on caveola mechanosensing and disassembly could also elicit cytoskeletal changes. External stretch of cells is an alternative approach to hypoosmotic stress that increases membrane tension and disassembles caveolae (Sinha et al., 2011). External stretch was applied to confluent MCF-10A monolayers grown on flexible silicone-based substrata in BioFlex culture plates. Cyclic-biaxial mechanical stretch (10% strain, 1 Hz, 5 min) displaced cavin1 from the junctional membranes, suggesting that caveolae were being disassembled (Supplemental Figure S1, f–h). This was accompanied by a significant increase in junctional F-actin (Figure 1, e and f and Supplemental Figure S2b). This cortical response to mechanical stretch was compromised, however, by Cav-1 KD, suggesting a role for caveolae, as we had observed for hypoosmotic stimulation. Together, the common responses to hypoosmotic stress and mechanical stretching suggested that caveolae might regulate the junctional cytoskeleton as part of a mechanotransduction pathway.

Caveola disassembly increases mechanical tension at AJ in response to hypoosmotic stimulation

We next asked whether the increase in junctional F-actin was accompanied by changes in junctional mechanics, focusing on AJ, which are often sites of mechanical tension. Junctional tension was evaluated first by measuring the initial recoil of vertices after laser-ablation of the bicellular AJ that connect those vertices (Ratheesh et al., 2012; Liang et al., 2016; Michael et al., 2016). Control monolayers showed a baseline-initial recoil, consistent with there being preexisting mechanical tension in the bicellular junctions. However, initial recoil was increased significantly after acute hypoosmotic stimulation and restored upon addition of isoosmotic media (Figure 2a). This suggested that hypoosmotic stimulation could reversibly increase AJ tension. However, hypoosmotic stress did not increase AJ tension in Cav-1 KD cells (Figure 2a), although these cells had an elevated baseline tension, as previously reported (Teo et al., 2020). This suggested that caveolae might be required for the rapid increase in AJ tension that occurred upon hypoosmotic stimulation.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mbc-34-ar120-g002.jpg

Mechanical activation of caveolae increases tension at AJ. a) Initial recoil velocity (IRV) of cell vertices following junctional laser ablation in confluent MCF-10A epithelial monolayers. In WT monolayers, hypoosmotic shock increased IRV by ~55% (p = 0.0006), which is returned to baseline levels following a 1 h recovery period in isoosmotic growth medium (p = 0.0306). In monolayers lacking caveolae (Cav-1 KD), baseline tension is increased by ~28% compared with WT monolayers. Importantly, this is unchanged following hypoosmotic shock (p = 0.7896). b) IF imaging of total α-catenin (middle) and α-catenin in its open conformation (α18; top). Lower row shows an image calculation of α18/α-catenin ratio, where the warmer colors indicate increased ratio. c) Quantification of (b) showing the percentage changes in the α18/α-catenin ratio following hypoosmotic shock in WT (~17%; p ≤ 0.0001), Cav-1 KD (~7%; p ≤ 0.0001), and Cav-1 KDR (~26%; p ≤ 0.0001) monolayers. Cav-1 KD monolayers also show a baseline increase of ~10%. d) In separate experiments, a 1 h pretreatment with 25 nM para-aminoblebbistatin (an inhibitor of actomyosin contractility) attenuated the IRV of cell vertices in WT monolayers by ~77% under control conditions (p ≤ 0.0001). In the absence of para-aminoblebbistatin, IRV was found to increase by ~63% following hypoosmotic shock (p ≤ 0.0001), but this was desensitized with the addition of para-aminoblebbistatin (p = 3920). e) Full dataset of α-18/α-catenin ratio (see Figure 2b/c) showing data points from individual cell–cell junctions. All data are means ± SD. IRV statistical analyses calculated from N = 3 independent experiments (20 junctions per experiment) using unpaired t tests. All other statistical analysis calculated from N = 3 independent experiments (60 junctions per experiment). Points on graphs represent individual cell junctions. ns, not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

To corroborate the results of recoil experiments, we then assayed changes in the conformation of the E-cadherin-associated protein, α-catenin, as an index of molecular-level tension at AJ. Application of mechanical tension causes conformational unfolding of α-catenin, exposing cryptic epitopes including one in the central M-domain that is recognized by the α18 monoclonal antibody (mAb; Yonemura et al., 2010; Noordstra et al., 2023). We therefore measured α18 mAb fluorescence intensity normalized for total-junctional α-catenin levels (α18/pan-α-catenin ratio) as a proxy for molecular-level tension applied to the cadherin–catenin complex. Supporting our recoil measurements, α18/pan-α-catenin ratios increased at AJ within 5 min of applying hypoosmotic media, and this was significantly reduced in Cav-1 KD monolayers (Figure 2, b and c). Specificity for Cav-1 was confirmed as the mechanical response was restored by expressing an RNAi-resistant Cav-1 transgene in the KD monolayers. Together, these data indicate that hypoosmotic stimulation increases mechanical tension at AJ in a caveola-dependent manner. This supported the notion that the junctional cytoskeleton was being altered by mechanical stimulation of caveolae.

Changes in junctional tension can reflect contributions from multiple elements of the AJ, potentially including the membrane itself as well as the cytoskeleton that physically couples to the cadherin–catenin adhesion complex. To dissect these possible factors, we inhibited Myosin II, which is responsible for the contractile forces that the cytoskeleton can directly and indirectly apply to AJ (Smutny et al., 2010; Ratheesh et al., 2012). Monolayers were treated with the Myosin II inhibitor, para-aminoblebbistatin (blebbistatin, 25 nM), before hypoosmotic shock. Blebbistatin reduced baseline-junctional tension as measured by recoil assays, consistent with a dominant contribution of cellular contractility to AJ tension. Importantly, hypoosmotic stimulation did not increase junctional tension in the presence of blebbistatin (Figure 2d). This suggested that cellular contractility might be principally responsible for the tensional response of AJ to hypoosmotic stimulation. This was confirmed by measuring α18/pan-α-catenin ratios, which increased when control monolayers were stimulated with hypoosmotic media, but not in the presence of blebbistatin (Figure 2e). Although we cannot exclude a role for a change in membrane tension, these findings imply that cytoskeletal change may be the major process responsible for the caveola-dependent increase in junctional tension that occurs upon hypoosmotic stimulation. Furthermore, because Cav-1 KD did not affect the response of NMII to hypoosmotic stimulation, we surmise that the increase in tension was principally due to the change in F-actin. This is consistent with earlier evidence that regulation of F-actin in the actomyosin system can increase mechanical tension, without concomitant change in NMII (Kovacs et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2014; Reymann et al., 2016; Teo et al., 2020).

Caveolae mechano-activation engages a PtdIns(4, 5)P 2-FMNL2 signaling pathway

We next sought to characterize the molecular pathway that reinforced the junctional-actin cytoskeleton when caveolae were stimulated with hypoosmotic media. Recently, we reported that the chronic depletion of caveolae activated a lipid-based signaling pathway that regulated the actin cytoskeleton (Teo et al., 2020). Specifically, Cav-1 RNAi increased phosphoinositide-4, 5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4, 5)P2) at AJ membranes, which directly recruited the FMNL2 formin to promote actin assembly at the junctional cortex. We therefore examined whether this pathway might have a physiological role when preexisting caveolae were acutely disassembled by mechano-stimulation.

PtdIns(4, 5)P2 was visualized by transiently expressing a location sensor bearing the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of phospholipase Cδ (mCherry-PH). In control monolayers, mCherry-PH localised primarily to the PM, being clearly evident at cell–cell contacts. Junctional PtdIns(4, 5)P2 levels increased by ~20% within 5 min of adding hypoosmotic media (Figure 3, a and b; Supplemental Figure S3c). This response did not occur, however, in Cav-1 KD cells, although baseline levels were higher, as previously reported (Teo et al., 2020). Reconstitution of KD cells with an RNAi-resistant transgene confirmed a specific effect of Cav-1 (Figure 3, a and b and Supplemental Figure S3c). This change was relatively selective for PtdIns(4, 5)P2, as hypoosmotic stress did not affect the membrane levels of PtdIns(3, 4, 5)P3, detected by expression of a sensor bearing the PH domain of Akt (PH-Akt-GFP; Supplemental Figure S3, a and b). Similarly, PtdIns(4, 5)P2 was increased by monolayer stretch (~17%, Figure 3, c and d). Together, these findings indicated that mechanoactivation of caveolae increased the identifiable levels of junctional PtdIns(4, 5)P2 at AJ.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mbc-34-ar120-g003.jpg

Mechanical stimulation of caveolae activates the PtdIns(4, 5)P2-FMNL2 signaling pathway. a) Fluorescence imaging of transiently expressed mCherry-PH, a biosensor for PtdIns(4, 5)P2 in WT (top), Cav-1 KD (middle), and Cav-1 KDR (bottom) MCF-10A monolayers before and after hypoosmotic shock (left and right columns, respectively; scale bar = 10 μm). b) Quantification of (a) reveals that WT monolayers are sensitive to hypoosmotic shock, with mCherry-PH increasing by ~20% (p ≤ 0.0001). Cav-1 KD monolayers were relatively insensitive to hypoosmotic shock, increasing by just ~4% (p = 0.0823). Cav-1 KDR monolayers were resensitized to hypoosmotic shock, with mCherry-PH increasing by ~18% (p ≤ 0.0001). c) Fluorescence imaging of mCherry-PH expressed in control monolayers (left) and those following 5 mins of 10% stretch. d) Quantification of (c) shows that mechanical stretching also increases mCherry-PH by ~17% (p ≤ 0.0001). e) Fluorescent imaging of transiently expressed FMNL2-EGFP in WT and Cav-1 KD monolayers before and after hypoosmotic shock. f) Quantification of (e) shows that FMNL2-EGFP is increased by ~30% following hypoosmotic shock (p ≤ 0.0001). In Cav-1 KD monolayers, baseline FMNL2-EGFP is elevated by ~21% compared with WTs (P ≤ 0.0001), and this is insensitive to further change with hypoosmotic shock (p = 0.4319). g) Fluorescence imaging of FMNL2-EGFP in control WT MCF-10A monolayers (top) or those pretreated for 1 h using 4 mM neomycin, a PtdIns(4, 5)P2 blocking agent (bottom). h) In the absence of neomycin, FMNL2-EGFP levels were increased by ~18% following hypoosmotic shock (p ≤ 0.0001). In the presence of neomycin, baseline FMNL2-EGFP levels were reduced by 14% (p ≤ 0.0001) and were not remained unchanged by hypoosmotic shock (p = 0.5540). All data are means ± SD. All statistical analyses calculated from N = 3 independent experiments (60 junctions per experiment) using unpaired t tests. Points on graphs represent individual cell junctions. ns, not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

We then expressed FMNL2-EGFP in MCF-10A cells to assess whether it was engaged by caveola mechanoactivation. Consistent with the observed change in PtdIns(4, 5)P2, junctional levels of FMNL2-EGFP also increased acutely when control monolayers were stimulated with hypoosmotic media and this response was abolished in Cav-1 KD cells (Figure 3, e and f). We then used the PtdIns(4, 5)P2 antagonist neomycin to test whether recruitment of FMNL2 required PtdIns(4, 5)P2. Pretreatment with neomycin (4 mM, 1 h) reduced baseline levels of FMNL2 and abolished its recruitment to junctions upon hypoosmotic stimulation (Figure 3, g and h). This supports the notion that the PtdIns(4, 5)P2-FMNL2 mechanism is activated when caveolae dissociate upon application of acute mechanical stress.

Molecular stabilization of caveolae antagonizes cortical reinforcement

We next sought to test whether this signaling pathway was engaged as a response to the acute disassembly of caveolae. To address this notion, we required a molecular strategy that would allow us to preserve caveolae in cells but render them more resistant to disassembly by mechanical stimulation.

The stability of caveolae is enhanced by interactions between undecad cavin1 (UC1) repeat domains and phosphatidylserine (PtdSer) and the number of UC1 repeats influences the ability of cavin1 to stabilize caveolae (Tillu et al., 2018). Mammalian cavin1 contains two UC1 domains, whereas zebrafish cavin1b (DrCavin1b) has five UC1 domains, and expression of DrCavin1b in mammalian cells increased the resistance of their caveolae to disassembly upon hypoosmotic stimulation (Tillu et al., 2018; Figure S1i). Therefore, we used lentiviral transduction to reconstitute cavin1 KD MCF-10A cells with either mouse cavin1 (MmCavin1-EGFP) or zebrafish cavin1 (DrCavin1b-EGFP), predicting that the greater number of UC1 domains would allow DrCavin1b-EGFP to stabilize caveolae against mechanical stress, compared with MmCavin1-EGFP (Figure 4a). We then measured the change in cavin1 fluorescence at AJ before and after mechanical stimulation as an index of cavin dissociation, where negative change indicates cavin dissociation. Indeed, cavin1 dissociated from the membrane upon hypoosmotic stress to a significantly lesser degree in DrCavin1b-EGFP cells compared with MmCavin1-EGFP cells (Figure 4, b and c; Supplemental Figure S4a). As a further control, we expressed a zebrafish cavin1 mutant construct in which four UC1 repeat domains were deleted ([increment]4UC1-EGFP), bringing its UC1 complement closer to that of mouse cavin1. Stress-induced cavin dissociation in [increment]4UC1-EGFP cells was similar to that in MmCavin1-EGFP cells (Figure 4, b and c; Supplemental Figure S4a). This supported the strategy that DrCavin1b, bearing a higher number of UC1 repeats, could stabilize caveolae against mechanical stress.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mbc-34-ar120-g004.jpg

Molecular stabilization of caveolae disrupts the cytoskeletal response to mechanical stimulation. a) Schematic of experimental design for molecular stabilization of caveolae through the expression of zebrafish cavin-1b (DrCavin1b) in human MCF-10A epithelial monolayers. Caveola stability is conferred through interactions between cavin-1 UC1 domains (shown in red) and phosphatidylserine (PtdSer) at the PM. In contrast to the two UC1 domains of mammalian cavin-1 (top), zebrafish cavin-1b (middle) contains five UC1 domains. This confers greater stability to caveolae, resisting their disassembly following mechanical stimuli. A further cavin-1 construct containing a single UC1 domain ([increment]4UC1) was adapted from zebrafish cavin-1b (bottom). This has characteristics closer to that of mammalian cavin-1 and is an additional control. b) IF imaging of various cavin-1 constructs in MCF-10A monolayers which are depleted of endogenous cavin-1 by shRNA-mediated KD (scale bar = 10 μm). c) Quantification of (b) showing that both mouse cavin-1 (MmCavin1; left) or a mutated zebrafish cavin-1b variant ([increment]4UC1; right) (both homologous to human cavin-1) are dissociated from the PM following hypoosmotic shock by ~18% (p ≤ 0.0001) and 17% (p ≤ 0.0001), respectively. In monolayers expressing DrCavin1b (middle), cavin-1 is resistant to dissociation following hypoosmotic shock, decreasing by just ~2% (p = 0.7277). d) Fluorescence imaging of F-actin in cavin-1 depleted MCF-10A monolayers expressing MmCavin1, DrCavin1b, or [increment]4UC1 cavin-1 constructs (scale bar = 10 μm). e) Quantification of changes to cortical F-actin levels following hypoosmotic shock in native cavin-1-depleted MCF-10A monolayers expressing the aforementioned cavin-1 variants. In monolayers expressing MmCavin1 and [increment]4UC1 (homologous to native cavin-1) cortical F-actin increased by ~40% (p ≤ 0.0001) and ~27% (p ≤ 0.0001), respectively, as analyzed by a change in fluorescence intensity. Monolayers expressing DrCavin1b did not show an increase in cortical F-actin (p = 0.0012). All data are means ± SD. All statistical analyses calculated from N = 3 independent experiments (60 junctions per experiment) using unpaired t tests. Points on graphs represent individual cell junctions. ns, not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

We then used this molecular stabilization strategy to test how acute disassembly of caveolae contributed to reinforcing the AJ cortex against mechanical stress. For this, we reconstituted cavin1 KD monolayers with our panel of cavin1 constructs. Cavin1 KD monolayers showed mechanosensitive responses in the cortex that were altered in a manner similar to those seen in Cav-1 KD cells. Namely, levels of junctional F-actin were increased at baseline in cavin1 KD cells, and they did not increase upon addition of hypoosmotic media. This similarity in effect of cavin1 and Cav-1 KD supports a role for caveolae in mediating the response to hypoosmotic stress, rather than either of these proteins independent of caveolae. Reconstitution of cavin1 KD with MmCavin1-EGFP restored their ability to reinforce the cortex, as did [increment]4UC1-EGFP cells (Figure 4, d and e; Supplemental Figure S4b). Strikingly, however, cortical reinforcement was effectively abolished by the DrCavin1b-EGFP, which stabilized caveolae. This implied that the process of caveola disassembly was necessary for caveolae to reinforce the cortex in response to mechanical stress.

Cortical reinforcement protects epithelial integrity against mechanical stress

Overall, our data indicates that the junctional cortex is enhanced by activation of PtdIns(4, 5)P2-FMNL2 signaling when caveolae disassemble in response to mechanical stress. In considering the potential function of this response, we hypothesized that such cortical reinforcement might increase the ability of cell–cell junctions to resist disruptive-mechanical stress (Acharya et al., 2018; Nanavati et al., 2023). To test this, we stimulated cellular contractility with calyculin A, which increases mechanical tension on cell–cell adhesions, but eventually causes contacts to break.

First, we assessed whether caveola disassembly was provoked by calyculin, focusing on early time points before cell–cell separation had begun. Indeed, cavin1 levels decreased upon calyculin A stimulation, as we saw with other modes of mechanical stress (Figure 5, a and b; Supplemental Figure S4c). However, this was countered when we stabilized caveolae with DrCavin1b-EGFP. Thus, after calyculin stimulation, cavin1 KD cells expressing DrCavin1b-EGFP retained greater levels of cavin1 at junctions than did KD cells reconstituted with MmCavin1-EGFP or [increment]4UC1-EGFP. This indicated that our molecular-stabilization strategy operated effectively in response to contractile stress as it did for hypotonic stress.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mbc-34-ar120-g005.jpg

Molecular stabilization of caveolae antagonizes PtdIns(4, 5)P2 signalling in response to contractile stimulation. a) IF imaging of various cavin-1 constructs in MCF-10A monolayers which are depleted of endogenous cavin-1 by shRNA-mediated KD (scale bar = 10 μm). b) Quantification of (a) showing that both MmCavin1 and [increment]4UC1 (both homologous to human cavin-1) are dissociated from the PM following 50 nM calyculin A exposure by ~25 (p ≤ 0.0001) and 21% (p ≤ 0.0001), respectively. In monolayers expressing DrCavin1b, cavin-1 is resistant to dissociation, decreasing by just ~9% (p = 0.0130). c) Fluorescence imaging of PH-mCherry in cavin-1 depleted monolayers reconstituted by MmCavin1-EGFP. d) Quantification of (f) shows that in cavin-1 depleted monolayers expressing MmCavin1-EGFP, PH-mCherry (PtdIns(4, 5)P2) is increased by ~15% (p ≤ 0.0001) following exposure to calyculin A. In contrast, monolayers expressing DrCavin1b-EGFP did not show an increase in PH-mCherry under the same conditions (p = 0.0734). e) Fluorescence imaging of F-actin in cavin-1 depleted MCF-10A monolayers expressing the aforementioned cavin-1 variants following exposure to 50 nM calyculin A. f) Quantification of (e) shows that calyculin A increased cortical F-actin by ~44 (p ≤ 0.0001) and 47% (p ≤ 0.0001) in MmCavin1 and [increment]4UC1 expressing monolayers, respectively, as analyzed by a change in fluorescence intensity. In monolayers expressing DrCavin1b, F-actin was not increased by calyculin A (p = 0.0205). g) Quantification of F-actin in WT monolayers following exposure to 50 nM calyculin A. In the absence of neomycin, F-actin levels were increased by ~32% (p ≤ 0.0001), as analyzed by a change in fluorescence intensity. However, this was reduced to ~13% in the presence of neomycin (p = 0.0009). All data are means ± SD. All statistical analyses calculated from N = 3 independent experiments (60 junctions per experiment) using unpaired t tests. Points on graphs represent individual cell junctions. ns, not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

To assess downstream signaling, we used mCherry-PH to measure the PtdIns(4, 5)P2 response to contractile stimulation, comparing responses in cavin1 KD cells reconstituted with either MsMmCavin1-EGFP or DrCavin1b-EGFP. Junctional PtdIns(4, 5)P2 increased rapidly upon calyculin stimulation in MmCavin1-EGFP cells (~15%), but this response was compromised in drCavin1-EGFP cells (~6%; Figure 5, c and d). This implied that contractile stress could elicit a PtdIns(4, 5)P2 signal at junctions as a consequence of caveola disassembly. This was accompanied by cortical reinforcement at junctions (Figure 5, e and f; Supplemental Figure S4d). Thus, junctional F-actin levels increased in response to calyculin in MmCavin1-EGFP, but not in DrCavin1b-EGFP. However, the F-actin response to calyculin was blocked by neomycin (Figure 5g), consistent with a role for PtdIns(4, 5)P2 signaling. Together, these findings indicated that contractile stimulation could elicit a cortical reinforcement at junctions through caveola disassembly.

Finally, we asked whether this caveola-disassembly mechanism influenced the resilience of monolayers to contractile stress. For this, we followed the monolayer response to calyculin in time-lapse movies. Characteristically, monolayer integrity was lost at individual points of separation between cells, which then appeared to propagate like a fracture. Blebbistatin substantially retarded the loss of cell–cell integrity (Supplemental Figure S5a), indicating that the effect of calyculin was mediated by increased contractility. Then, to evaluate monolayer resilience we measured the time from addition of calyculin to when separations first appeared in the movies (Figure 6, a and b). For these experiments we used cavin1 KD cells reconstituted with either MmCavin1-EGFP or [increment]4UC1-EGFP as our controls, as they showed times to initial fracture that were similar to those in wild-type MCF-10A cells. However, molecular stabilization of caveolae by expression of DrCavin1b-EGFP accelerated the rupture process, occurring ~20% earlier than in the controls, as it also was when PtdIns(4, 5)P2 signaling was blocked with neomycin (Figure 6, c and d). This suggests that caveola disassembly increases monolayer resistance to the tensile stress of enhanced contractility.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mbc-34-ar120-g006.jpg

Caveola mechanotransduction confers resilience on epithelial monolayers against tensile stress. a) Representative differential interference contrast (DIC) imaging of cavin-1 shRNA MCF-10A monolayers expressing either MmCavin1 or DrCavin1b cavin-1 variants treated with 50 nM calyculin A at 37°C. Cell-free fractures are highlighted in red. b) Quantification of (a) confirming that fracture was accelerated by molecular stabilization of caveolae with DrCavin1b. c) Representative DIC imaging of WT monolayers exposed to 50 nM calyculin A in the absence, or presence of neomycin. d) Quantification of (c) shows that neomycin accelerates the onset of calyculin-induced fracture of MCF-10A monolayers. All data are means ± SD. All statistical analyses calculated from N = 3 independent experiments (three regions per experiment) using unpaired t tests. Points on graphs represent individual cell junctions. ns, not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

DISCUSSION

Caveolae respond to mechanical stress by disassembly of the cavin protein coat, accompanied by partial or complete flattening of these organelles (Sinha et al., 2011). This process protects cells against mechanical stress by releasing reservoirs of membrane that buffer against increased membrane tension (Lee and Schmid-Schönbein, 1995; Sinha et al., 2011; Cheng et al., 2015; Lo et al., 2015, 2016; Lim et al., 2017; Del Pozo et al., 2021). However, caveola disassembly also has the capacity to elicit other cellular responses by increasing the availability of lipids that activate cell signaling (Teo et al., 2020) or, indeed, through the released cavins themselves (McMahon et al., 2019, 2021; Wu et al., 2023). Our current experiments now identify the actin cortex as a critical target of caveola mechanotransduction. Thus, we found that the actin cortex at epithelial AJ was reinforced in a caveola-dependent manner when monolayers were exposed to diverse forces that induced caveola disassembly. Cortical reinforcement appeared to be mediated by the recruitment of FMNL2 in response to increased accessible levels of PtdIns(4, 5)P2, a pathway that we earlier observed to be activated when caveolae were chronically depleted by RNAi (Teo et al., 2020).

Similarly, in our present studies, cortical reinforcement in response to acute mechanical stimuli was compromised by CAV-1 RNAi. However, while these observations support a role for caveolae, they did not directly test whether disassembly of already present caveolae was the responsible mechanism. This is because the RNAi studies could not discriminate effects due to the acute disassembly from secondary effects of chronic depletion. We addressed this by developing a molecular-stabilization strategy to increase the resistance of already present caveolae to disassembly by mechanical stimulation. This was based on earlier evidence that caveola stability is influenced by the number of UC repeats in cavin1, which directly interact with phosphatidylserine (PtdSer) in the PM (Tillu et al., 2018). Indeed, we found that reconstituting Cavin1 KD cells with zebrafish cavin1, which contains five UC1 repeats, could stabilize caveola against disassembly by mechanical stress, compared with cavin1 transgenes that had fewer UC1 repeats. Stabilization of caveolae prevented the junctional cortex from being reinforced and blocked the activation of the PtdIns(4, 5)P2 pathway, as measured by changes in accessible phosphoinositide. Importantly, this was accompanied by a change in the resilience of monolayers to mechanical stress. We tested this by activating cellular contractility with calyculin, which disrupts cell–cell integrity, causing monolayers to tear apart (Acharya et al., 2018). This fragmentation process was accelerated when we stabilized caveolae with zebrafish Cavin1, to prevent their acute disassembly. This effect was reproduced by blocking PtdIns(4, 5)P2 with neomycin, supporting a role for the PtdIns(4, 5)P2 pathway. Together, these results argue that cortical reinforcement provides a pathway for caveolar mechanotransduction to protect cell–cell integrity against disruption by mechanical stresses.

This role for cortical reinforcement in epithelial resilience is consistent with the well-characterized contribution of F-actin to cadherin adhesion. Association of classical cadherins with F-actin is essential for effective adhesion (Noordstra et al., 2023) and junctional cohesion is enhanced by actin assembly and stabilization (Kovacs et al., 2011; Engl et al., 2014; Lenne et al., 2021). Therefore, signaling to F-actin would provide a pathway for caveola to reinforce cell–cell junctions against mechanical stresses. Of note, in our current and earlier experiments (Acharya et al., 2018), cell–cell adhesion appears to be a rate-limiting factor that defines monolayer resilience, as monolayer integrity is first lost when cell–cell junctions rupture. Thus, mechanical disassembly of caveolae can be understood to provide two complementary pathways for mechanoprotection. Buffering against increased-membrane tension would act at the cellular level, while reinforcement of junctions would operate at the supracellular level.

Cortical reinforcement at AJ was accompanied by an increase in the mechanical line tension of the AJ themselves, consistent with earlier evidence that actomyosin-based tension can be increased by change in F-actin, as well as Myosin II (Wu et al., 2014; Michael et al., 2016; Teo et al., 2020). However, this result seemed paradoxical as increased junctional tension might be anticipated to increase the vulnerability of monolayers to tensile stresses. How could cortical reinforcement overcome its accompanying increase in junctional tension? Interestingly, a similar paradox was raised for tension-activated RhoA signaling, which also supports monolayer resilience to tensile stresses, despite also increasing junctional tension (Acharya et al., 2018). In this latter case, the paradox was resolved by modelling, which indicated that reinforcement of cortical actin increased the tensile strength of the monolayers. A similar mechanical process may explain the protective effect when caveola mechanoactivation reinforces the cortex. In other words, increased line tension within AJ may be an epiphenomenon that was compensated by enhanced tensile strength.

Our results thus identify caveola mechanotransduction as one of a number of mechanisms that epithelial cells possess to detect and respond to mechanical stresses. At AJ, other mechanoprotective mechanisms include catch bonds in the adhesive ectodomain of classical cadherins as well as at their interface with cortical-actin filaments (Noordstra et al., 2023); and tension-activated RhoA signaling based on the assembly of an E-cadherin-Myosin VI mechanosensor (Acharya et al., 2018; Duszyc et al., 2021). This raises questions about how these diverse mechanisms may be integrated. Redundancy amongst these mechanoprotective mechanisms may account for the observation that caveola-depleted animals can preserve tissue integrity (Drab et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2008). Or these mechanisms may be linked in as-yet-unknown ways. Future research will be necessary to address these issues. However, in closing we would highlight three factors that might guide such an analysis.

First, it will be important to establish the force regimes that activate these mechanosensory mechanisms. For example, catch-bonds in the E-cadherin adhesive interaction and the association of α-catenin with F-actin were engaged at forces consistent with that generated by single Myosin II motors (~5 pN; Noordstra et al., 2023). These, therefore, fit well with molecular-level mechano-protective mechanisms. Caveola mechanotransduction potentially operates at the nm scale of the organelle itself, as it involves disassembly of the cavin coat. But the force regime for this process remains to be characterized. Second, both caveola disassembly and tension-activated RhoA signaling are engaged on minutes-long time scales, suggesting that they may represent more delayed responses to mechanical stress than catch bonds. One possibility is that they represent secondary lines of response if mechanical stress persists. Finally, cadherin-based mechanotransduction mechanisms are specific for AJ. Although in the present study we focused on its impact on AJ, the capacity of caveolae to signal to the actin cortex is likely to have impacts elsewhere in the cell. It will therefore be interesting to test whether the pathway that we identified is used away from cell–cell junctions to allow caveolae to confer mechanoprotection to cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Request a protocol through Bio-protocol.

Cell culture, drugs, and transfection

MCF-10A cells were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a medium consisting of DMEM/F-12 with GlutaMAX, supplemented to a final concentration with 5% horse serum, 20 ng mL–1 human epidermal growth factor (hEGF), 0.5 mg mL–1, 0.5 mg mL–1 hydrocortisone, 100 ng mL–1 cholera toxin, 10 μg mL–1 human insulin, 50 U mL–1 penicillin, and 50 μg mL–1 streptomycin. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific #L300015) for the expression of plasmid constructs according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Cells were analyzed 24 h posttransfection. Where blebbistatin was used, monolayers were exposed to 25 nM para-aminoblebbistatin for 1 h before mechanical stimulation/analysis. For neomycin experiments, monolayers were exposed to 4 mM neomycin for 1 h before mechanical stimulation/analysis.

Generation of stable-cell lines

Stable cell lines were produced using lentiviral transduction. To generate lentiviruses, HEK-293T cells were transfected with the expression vector, PLL5.0, and lentiviral packaging constructs, pMDLg/pRRE, RSV-Rev, and pMD.G using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Viruses were concentrated from the supernatant after 48 h using Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filters (Millipore UFC-9100). MCF-10A cells were transduced with the concentrated viruses, and positive cells isolated using a FACS Aria Cell Sorter (Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland).

Immunostaining

MCF-10A cells were cultured to confluence and fixed with 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde (PFA) in cytoskeleton stabilization buffer (10 mM piperazine-N,N’-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid [PIPES] at pH 6.8, 100 mM KCl, 200 mM sucrose, 2 mM ethylene glycol-bis(b-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N’,N’-tetraacetic acid [EGTA], 2 mM MgCl2) on ice for 20 min. Alternatively, cells were fixed for 10 min in –20°C MeOH at -20°C. PFA-fixed cells were permeabilized for 5 min in 0.25% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells were then blocked for 1 h on ice using 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS, followed by incubation with primary antibodies diluted in 3% BSA in PBS overnight at 4°C. Cells were washed in PBS and then incubated with similarly diluted secondary antibodies for 90 min at room temperature before final washing in PBS. Coverslips were mounted onto slides using ProLong Gold containing DAPI (Cell Signaling Technologies; catalogue#8961). Immunostaining for phosphorylated proteins was performed using tris-buffered saline (TBS) instead of PBS.

Junctional laser ablation

For junctional laser ablation, MCF-10A monolayers expressing E-cadherin-mCherry were used to visualize cell–cell junctions. To sever these junctions, a Zeiss 710 Inverted LSM equipped with Mai Tai two-photon capabilities was used. Ablation was performed using a 790 nm laser with 30 iterations and 22% transmission. Images were taken at 5 s intervals until the recoil of cell vertices was complete.

Microscopy

Cells were imaged using several microscopes. Fixed samples on glass coverslips were imaged using either a Zeiss Axio two epifluorescence microscope using a 40× 0.95 NA Plan Neofluar or 63× 1.4 NA Plan Apochromat objective, or a Zeiss 880 inverted confocal microscope with AiryScan using a 40× 1.3 NA, or 63× 1.4 NA Plan Apochromat objective. For imaging monolayers cultured on BioFlex plates, imaging was performed using a Zeiss 710 upright confocal microscope using a 40× 1.0 NA water dipping N-Achroplan objective. For TFM, imaging was performed using a Zeiss AxioObserver microscope using a 40× 0.75 NA EC-Plan Neofluar objective. AiryScan scans of F-actin are presented as conventional contrast images; other confocal-imaging modalities are presented as inverted contrast.

Immunoblotting

Immunoblotting was performed using sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE). Protein was harvested by lysing confluent monolayers in a solution containing 0.1% bromophenol blue, 2% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 6.8), 10% glycerol, 200 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and PhosSTOP (Sigma PHOSS-RO). Note that PhosSTOP was only used for detecting nonphosphorylated proteins. Cells were scraped from the dish and transferred to 1.5 ml tubes and heated to 100°C for 10 min. Proteins were loaded into 1.5-mm thick homemade polyacrylamide gels consisting of a lower-running gel containing between 8 and 15% acrylamide and an upper-stacking gel consisting of 4% acrylamide. Protein separation was achieved by electrophoresis at 180V (400 mA) in a running buffer consisting of 25 mM Tris Base, 192 mM glycine, and 3.47 mM sodium dodecyl sulphate. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose filters and blocked using either 3% skim milk powder in TBS or 3% BSA in TBS. Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated with the nitrocellulose filters overnight at 4°C. Filters were then washed in TBS containing 0.1% Tween (TBS-T) and the secondary (horseradish peroxidase [HRP]) antibodies, similarly diluted, were incubated for 90 min at room temperature. For visualization, membranes were exposed to a solution which allows the HRP-conjugated antibodies to emit chemiluminescence (Thermo Fisher ScientificTM 34578).

Application of mechanical tension in monolayers

Hypoosmotic shock was used to induce rapid-cell swelling. This consisted of regular growth media, diluted in a 1:1 ratio with dH2O, giving a concentration of approximately 150 mOsm L–1. Cells were exposed to hypoosmotic medium for 5 min (unless otherwise stated) under usual culture conditions. If applicable, cells were recovered for 1 h in usual growth medium under usual-culture conditions following hypoosmotic shock. Mechanical stretching was performed using the Flexcell FX-5000 Tension System. Cells were cultured on BioFlex plates which have a silicone base coated in type I collagen. Unless otherwise stated, stretching consisted of cyclic flexing at a frequency of 1 Hz, to a strain of 10%, for 5 min. Stretching was performed at room temperature. To stimulate hypercontraction of actomyosin, growth medium was supplemented with calyculin A to a concentration of 50 nM for 5 min under regular-growth conditions (unless otherwise stated).

Knockdown of human cavin1 and expression of MmCavin1_EGFP, DrCavin1b_EGFP, or [increment]4UC1_EGFP

Endogenous cavin1 was KD from MCF-10A cells via lentivirus-mediated RNAi using the following shRNA sequence 5′-CACCTTCCACGTCAAGAAGATCCGCGAGG-3′ inserted downstream of a U6 promoter within the PLL5.0_EGFP expression vector. This shRNA targets a translated region within human cavin1. Cavin1 variants (MmCavin1, DrCavin1b, or [increment]4UC1) were inserted upstream of an EGFP sequence, with expression driven by an upstream LTR viral promoter. Plasmids were synthesized by Addgene.

Image analysis

Image analysis was performed using FIJI (ImageJ) for fluorescent microscopy, including MATLAB for TFM microscopy. For the analysis of F-actin, a line of standardized length was drawn perpendicular to the cell–cell junction and the fluorescence of all pixels along this line quantified using FIJI. The minimum intensity of this line was subtracted from the maximum intensity as background using Microsoft Excel. For all other junctional/cortical proteins, a freehand line was drawn over the entire junction, and a duplicate of this line transferred to the underlying cytosol. A ratio of the junctional to cytoplasmic ratio was calculated to determine the level of these proteins. For junctional laser ablation, cell–cell junctions were severed, and the length of the junction measured at 5 s intervals for 60 s, normalized to the length of the junction at time 0. For monolayer fracturing, monolayers were imaged as a time sequence at 30 s intervals following exposure to 50 nM calyculin A. Monolayer rupture was quantified according to the first frame in which cells appeared to pull apart. Prism (GraphPad) was used to generate graphs and perform statistical analysis.

Quantification of cellular F-actin organization

To quantify the ratio of junctional to nonjunctional F-actin monolayers were imaged as Z-stacks and maximum-projected. Using a home-built MATLAB code, the start- and endpoints of 17 cell–cell junctions and 17 noncortical regions per image were selected on the midplane of the monolayer. These points were connected by straight lines and expanded to a width of 1.7 μm to create masks for the intensity analysis of cortical/noncortical F-actin. The masks were overlaid upon the max-projected image, and the intensity values of each mask were averaged.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

We thank our lab colleagues for their support throughout this project, notably Ivar Noordstra for many helpful suggestions and Julia Eckert for help with the biophysical analysis. This work was supported by funds from the National Health and Medical Research Council (1140090 to A.S.Y. and R.G.P., 1136592 to A.S.Y., APP2016410 and APP1181135 to B.M.C.) and Australian Research Council (DP19010287 and DP220103951 to A.S.Y.). R.G.P. was supported by an National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowship APP1156489 and is now an Australian Research Council (ARC) Laureate Fellow. J.W.B. was supported by a scholarship from the UQ Research Training Program. Additionally, this work was supported by a research training scholarship from the University of Queensland (UQRTP). Microscopy was performed at the ACRF/IMB Cancer Research Imaging Facility created with the generous support of the Australian Cancer Research Foundation.

Abbreviations used:

AJadherens junction
CAV1caveolin 1
Drdanio rerio
EGFPenhanced green fluorescent protein
FMNL2formin-like protein 2
IFimmunofluorescence
IRVinitial recoil velocity
KDknockdown
KDRKD reconstituted
mAbmonoclonal antibody
MmMus musculus
NMIInon-muscle myosin type II
PHpleckstrin homology
PMplasma membrane
PtdIns(4, 5)P 2phosphatidylinositol (4, 5)-bisphosphate
PtdSerphosphatidylserine
UC1undecad cavin1
WTwild-type

Footnotes

This article was published online ahead of print in MBoC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E23-05-0163) on September 6, 2023.

REFERENCES

  • Acharya BR, Nestor-Bergmann A, Liang X, Gupta S, Duszyc K, Gauquelin E, Gomez GA, Budnar S, Marcq P, Jensen OE, et al. (2018). A Mechanosensitive RhoA Pathway that Protects Epithelia against Acute Tensile Stress. Dev Cell 47, 439–452.e436. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Charras G, Yap AS (2018). Tensile Forces and Mechanotransduction at Cell–Cell Junctions. Curr Biol 28, R445–R457. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Cheng JPX, Mendoza-Topaz C, Howard G, Chadwick J, Shvets E, Cowburn AS, Dunmore BJ, Crosby A, Morrell NW, Nichols BJ (2015). Caveolae protect endothelial cells from membrane rupture during increased cardiac output. J Cell Biol 211, 53–61. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Choi H-J, Pokutta S, Cadwell GW, Bobkov AA, Bankston LA, Liddington RC, Weis WI (2012). αE-catenin is an autoinhibited molecule that coactivates vinculin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109, 8576–8581. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Del Pozo MA, Lolo F-N, Echarri A (2021). Caveolae: Mechanosensing and mechanotransduction devices linking membrane trafficking to mechanoadaptation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 68, 113–123. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Delva E, Tucker DK, Kowalczyk AP (2009). The Desmosome. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1, a002543–a002543. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Drab M, Verkade P, Elger M, Kasper M, Lohn M, Lauterbach B, Menne J, Lindschau C, Mende F, Luft FC, et al. (2001). Loss of Caveolae, Vascular Dysfunction, and Pulmonary Defects in Caveolin-1 Gene-Disrupted Mice. Science 293, 2449–2452. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Duszyc K, Gomez GA, Lagendijk AK, Yau M-K, Nanavati BN, Gliddon BL, Hall TE, Verma S, Hogan BM, Pitson SM, et al. (2021). Mechanotransduction activates RhoA in the neighbors of apoptotic epithelial cells to engage apical extrusion. Curr Biol 31, 1326–1336.e1325. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Echarri A, Del Pozo MA (2015). Caveolae – mechanosensitive membrane invaginations linked to actin filaments. J Cell Sci 128, 2747–2758. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Engl W, Arasi B, Yap LL, Thiery JP, Viasnoff V (2014). Actin dynamics modulate mechanosensitive immobilization of E-cadherin at adherens junctions. Nat Cell Biol 16, 584–591. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia J, Bagwell J, Njaine B, Norman J, Levic DS, Wopat S, Miller SE, Liu X, Locasale JW, Stainier DYR, et al. (2017). Sheath Cell Invasion and Trans-differentiation Repair Mechanical Damage Caused by Loss of Caveolae in the Zebrafish Notochord. Curr Biol 27, 1982–1989.e1983. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Goetz J G, Minguet S, Navarro-Lérida I, Lazcano Juan J, Samaniego R, Calvo E, Tello M, Osteso-Ibáñez T, Pellinen T, Echarri A, et al. (2011). Biomechanical Remodeling of the Microenvironment by Stromal Caveolin-1 Favors Tumor Invasion and Metastasis. Cell 146, 148–163. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Grande-García A, Echarri A, de Rooij J, Alderson NB, Waterman-Storer CM, Valdivielso JM, del Pozo MA (2007). Caveolin-1 regulates cell polarization and directional migration through Src kinase and Rho GTPases. J Cell Biol 177, 683–694. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Haas AJ, Zihni C, Ruppel A, Hartmann C, Ebnet K, Tada M, Balda MS, Matter K (2020). Interplay between Extracellular Matrix Stiffness and JAM-A Regulates Mechanical Load on ZO-1 and Tight Junction Assembly. Cell Rep 32, 107924. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hetmanski JHR, de Belly H, Busnelli I, Waring T, Nair RV, Sokleva V, Dobre O, Cameron A, Gauthier N, Lamaze C, et al. (2019). Membrane Tension Orchestrates Rear Retraction in Matrix-Directed Cell Migration. Dev Cell 51, 460–475.e410. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Huveneers S, Oldenburg J, Spanjaard E, van der Krogt G, Grigoriev I, Akhmanova A, Rehmann H, de Rooij J (2012). Vinculin associates with endothelial VE-cadherin junctions to control force-dependent remodeling. J Cell Biol 196, 641–652. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kovacs EM, Verma S, Ali RG, Ratheesh A, Hamilton NA, Akhmanova A, Yap AS (2011). N-WASP regulates the epithelial junctional actin cytoskeleton through a non-canonical post-nucleation pathway. Nat Cell Biol 13,934–943. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee J, Schmid-Schönbein GW (1995). Biomechanics of skeletal muscle capillaries: Hemodynamic resistance, endothelial distensibility, and pseudopod formation. Ann Biomed Eng 23, 226–246. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lenne P-F, Rupprecht J-F, Viasnoff V (2021). Cell Junction Mechanics beyond the Bounds of Adhesion and Tension. Dev Cell 56, 202–212. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Liang X, Michael M, Gomez G (2016). Measurement of Mechanical Tension at cell-cell junctions using two-photon laser ablation. Bio Protoc 6, e2068. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lim Y-W, Lo HP, Ferguson C, Martel N, Giacomotto J, Gomez GA, Yap AS, Hall TE, Parton RG (2017). Caveolae Protect Notochord Cells against Catastrophic Mechanical Failure during Development. Curr Biol 27, 1968–1981.e1967. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu L, Brown D, McKee M, LeBrasseur NK, Yang D, Albrecht KH, Ravid K, Pilch PF (2008). Deletion of Cavin/PTRF Causes Global Loss of Caveolae, Dyslipidemia, and Glucose Intolerance. Cell Metab 8, 310–317. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lo HP, Nixon SJ, Hall TE, Cowling BS, Ferguson C, Morgan GP, Schieber NL, Fernandez-Rojo MA, Bastiani M, Floetenmeyer M, et al. (2015). The caveolin–cavin system plays a conserved and critical role in mechanoprotection of skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol 210, 833–849. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lo HP, Hall TE, Parton RG (2016). Mechanoprotection by skeletal muscle caveolae. BioArchitecture 6, 22–27. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lu Z, Ghosh S, Wang Z, Hunter T (2003). Downregulation of caveolin-1 function by EGF leads to the loss of E-cadherin, increased transcriptional activity of β-catenin, and enhanced tumor cell invasion. Cancer Cell 4, 499–515. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • McMahon K-A, Wu Y, Gambin Y, Sierecki E, Tillu VA, Hall T, Martel N, Okano S, Moradi SV, Ruelcke JE, et al. (2019). Identification of intracellular cavin target proteins reveals cavin-PP1alpha interactions regulate apoptosis. Nat Commun 10, 3279. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • McMahon K-A, Stroud DA, Gambin Y, Tillu V, Bastiani M, Sierecki E, Polinkovsky ME, Hall TE, Gomez GA, Wu Y, et al. (2021). Cavin3 released from caveolae interacts with BRCA1 to regulate the cellular stress response. eLife 10, e61407. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Mège RM, Ishiyama N (2017). Integration of Cadherin Adhesion and Cytoskeleton at Adherens Junctions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 9, a028738. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Michael M, Meiring Joyce CM, Acharya Bipul R, Matthews Daniel R, Verma S, Han Siew P, Hill Michelle M, Parton Robert G, Gomez Guillermo A, Yap Alpha S (2016). Coronin 1B Reorganizes the Architecture of F-Actin Networks for Contractility at Steady-State and Apoptotic Adherens Junctions. Dev Cell 37, 58–71. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Nanavati BN, Noordstra I, Verma S, Duszyc K, Green KJ, Yap AS (2023). Desmosome-anchored intermediate filaments facilitate tension-sensitive RhoA signaling for epithelial homeostasis. BioRxiv, 10.1101/2023.02.23.529786. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Noordstra I, Morris RG, Yap AS (2023). Cadherins and the cortex: A matter of time? Curr Opin Cell Biol 80, 102154. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Orlichenko L, Weller SG, Cao H, Krueger EW, Awoniyi M, Beznoussenko G, Buccione R, McNiven MA, Mostov KE (2009). Caveolae Mediate Growth Factor-induced Disassembly of Adherens Junctions to Support Tumor Cell Dissociation. Mol Biol Cell 20, 4140–4152. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Palacios F, Schweitzer JK, Boshans RL, D’Souza-Schorey C (2002). ARF6-GTP recruits Nm23-H1 to facilitate dynamin-mediated endocytosis during adherens junctions disassembly. Nat Cell Biol 4, 929–936. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Pokutta S, Drees F, Takai Y, Nelson WJ, Weis WI (2002). Biochemical and Structural Definition of the l-Afadin- and Actin-binding Sites of α-Catenin. J Biol Chem 277, 18868–18874. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Radel C, Rizzo V (2005). Integrin mechanotransduction stimulates caveolin-1 phosphorylation and recruitment of Csk to mediate actin reorganization. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288, H936–H945. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Ratheesh A, Gomez GA, Priya R, Verma S, Kovacs EM, Jiang K, Brown NH, Akhmanova A, Stehbens SJ, Yap AS (2012). Centralspindlin and α-catenin regulate Rho signalling at the epithelial zonula adherens. Nat Cell Biol 14, 818–828. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Reymann A-C, Staniscia F, Erzberger A, Salbreux G, Grill SW (2016). Cortical flow aligns actin filaments to form a furrow. eLife 5, e17807. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rog-Zielinska EA, Scardigli M, Peyronnet R, Zgierski-Johnston CM, Greiner J, Madl J, O’Toole ET, Morphew M, Hoenger A, Sacconi L, et al. (2021). Beat-by-Beat Cardiomyocyte T-Tubule Deformation Drives Tubular Content Exchange. Circ Res 128, 203–215. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Sinha B, Köster D, Ruez R, Gonnord P, Bastiani M, Abankwa D, Stan RV, Butler-Browne G, Vedie B, Johannes L, et al. (2011). Cells Respond to Mechanical Stress by Rapid Disassembly of Caveolae. Cell 144, 402–413. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Smutny M, Cox HL, Leerberg JM, Kovacs EM, Conti MA, Ferguson C, Hamilton NA, Parton RG, Adelstein RS, Yap AS (2010). Myosin II isoforms identify distinct functional modules that support integrity of the epithelial zonula adherens. Nat Cell Biol 12, 696–702. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Spadaro D, Le S, Laroche T, Mean I, Jond L, Yan J, Citi S (2017). Tension-Dependent Stretching Activates ZO-1 to Control the Junctional Localization of Its Interactors. Curr Biol 27, 3783–3795.e3788. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Teo JL, Gomez GA, Weeratunga S, Davies EM, Noordstra I, Budnar S, Katsuno-Kambe H, McGrath MJ, Verma S, Tomatis V, et al. (2020). Caveolae Control Contractile Tension for Epithelia to Eliminate Tumor Cells. Dev Cell 54, 75–91.e77. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Tillu VA, Lim YW, Kovtun O, Mureev S, Ferguson C, Bastiani M, McMahon KA, Lo HP, Hall TE, Alexandrov K, et al. (2018). A variable undecad repeat domain in cavin1 regulates caveola formation and stability. EMBO Rep 19, e45775. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Volontè D, Galbiati F, Lisanti MP (1999). Visualization of caveolin-1, a caveolar marker protein, in living cells using green fluorescent protein (GFP) chimeras. FEBS Lett 445, 431–439. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu SK, Gomez GA, Michael M, Verma S, Cox HL, Lefevre JG, Parton RG, Hamilton NA, Neufeld Z, Yap AS (2014). Cortical F-actin stabilization generates apical–lateral patterns of junctional contractility that integrate cells into epithelia. Nat Cell Biol 16, 167–178. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu Y, Lim Y-W, Stroud DA, Martel N, Hall TE, Lo HP, Ferguson C, Ryan MT, McMahon K-A, Parton RG (2023). Caveolae sense oxidative stress through membrane lipid peroxidation and cytosolic release of CAVIN1 to regulate NRF2. Dev Cell 58, 376–397.e374. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang B, Radel C, Hughes D, Kelemen S, Rizzo V (2011). p190 RhoGTPase-Activating Protein Links the β1 Integrin/Caveolin-1 Mechanosignaling Complex to RhoA and Actin Remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 31, 376–383. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Yao M, Qiu W, Liu R, Efremov AK, Cong P, Seddiki R, Payre M, Lim CT, Ladoux B, Mège R-M, et al. (2014). Force-dependent conformational switch of α-catenin controls vinculin binding. Nat Commun 5. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Yonemura S, Wada Y, Watanabe T, Nagafuchi A, Shibata M (2010). α-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development. Nat Cell Biol 12, 533–542. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhong M, Wu W, Kang H, Hong Z, Xiong S, Gao X, Rehman J, Komarova YA, Malik AB (2020). Alveolar Stretch Activation of Endothelial Piezo1 Protects Adherens Junctions and Lung Vascular Barrier. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 62, 168–177. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Biology of the Cell are provided here courtesy of American Society for Cell Biology

Citations & impact 


This article has not been cited yet.

Impact metrics

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/154196586
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/154196586

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.