Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Background

While enteric viruses are highly transmissible, household factors associated with transmission are less well documented. We identified individual- and household-level factors associated with viral acute gastroenteritis (AGE) transmission in a large health care network in the United States.

Methods

Patients presenting with AGE were enrolled from April 2014 to September 2016. Patients and symptomatic household members were interviewed, and stool specimens were collected and tested for viral pathogens. Within a household, primary cases were those with the earliest symptom onset and a positive viral test result; secondary cases were household contacts (HHCs) with symptom onset 1-7 days from the primary case onset. Transmission households had at least 1 secondary case.

Results

Our analysis included 570 primary cases with 1479 HHCs. The overall secondary attack rate was 23%. HHCs were likely to become secondary cases (n = 338) if they were <5 years old (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6). Secondary transmission was likely to occur if the primary case was aged <5 years (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.6) or 5 to 17 years (aOR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.9-5.7), was norovirus positive (aOR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.9-3.7), had a diapered contact (aOR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.6-3.2), or reported symptoms for >4 days (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1). Households with ≥3 members (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.5) were more likely to experience transmission.

Discussion

Risk of AGE transmission within households increased if the primary case was younger, was norovirus positive, had a longer symptom duration, or had a diapered contact. Targeted prevention messaging around appropriate cleaning, disinfection, and isolation of persons with AGE should be encouraged.

Free full text 


Logo of ofidLink to Publisher's site
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Dec; 10(12): ofad619.
Published online 2023 Dec 8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad619
PMCID: PMC10753916
PMID: 38156052

Household Transmission of Viral Acute Gastroenteritis Among Participants Within an Integrated Health Care Delivery System, 2014–2016

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Abstract

Background

While enteric viruses are highly transmissible, household factors associated with transmission are less well documented. We identified individual- and household-level factors associated with viral acute gastroenteritis (AGE) transmission in a large health care network in the United States.

Methods

Patients presenting with AGE were enrolled from April 2014 to September 2016. Patients and symptomatic household members were interviewed, and stool specimens were collected and tested for viral pathogens. Within a household, primary cases were those with the earliest symptom onset and a positive viral test result; secondary cases were household contacts (HHCs) with symptom onset 1-7 days from the primary case onset. Transmission households had at least 1 secondary case.

Results

Our analysis included 570 primary cases with 1479 HHCs. The overall secondary attack rate was 23%. HHCs were likely to become secondary cases (n = 338) if they were <5 years old (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2–2.6). Secondary transmission was likely to occur if the primary case was aged <5 years (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4–3.6) or 5 to 17 years (aOR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.9–5.7), was norovirus positive (aOR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.9–3.7), had a diapered contact (aOR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.6-3.2), or reported symptoms for >4 days (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.1). Households with ≥3 members (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1–4.5) were more likely to experience transmission.

Discussion

Risk of AGE transmission within households increased if the primary case was younger, was norovirus positive, had a longer symptom duration, or had a diapered contact. Targeted prevention messaging around appropriate cleaning, disinfection, and isolation of persons with AGE should be encouraged.

Keywords: acute gastroenteritis, household, norovirus, risk factor, transmission

Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) causes >179 million illnesses and 1.6 million deaths annually in the United States [1]. Enteric viruses such as norovirus, rotavirus, sapovirus, and astrovirus are leading causes of AGE and are known to cause outbreaks via person-to-person contact or through contaminated food, water, or fomites [2–7]. A recent study reported the overall incidence of medically attended AGE (MAAGE) as 40.6 episodes per 1000 person-years and found norovirus to be the most important contributor, followed by sapovirus, astrovirus, and rotavirus [6]. Although contact with a person with viral AGE, especially within the same household, is a known risk factor for acquiring AGE, studies exploring factors affecting household transmission of viral AGE are limited [8–14]. Thus, an improved understanding of household transmission dynamics of viral AGE is needed to help identify high-risk groups and target prevention measures to effectively curb the chain of transmission. Additionally, with norovirus vaccine candidates in development, identifying high-risk groups causing household transmission could aid vaccine allocation strategies and further assist in preventing severe disease in other household members.

The MAAGE study was an active surveillance program established within Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW), an integrated health care delivery system serving the northwest Oregon and southwest Washington regions, and was demographically similar to the total population of the underlying catchment area [15]. This platform collected survey data and stool samples from patients with MAAGE. It also allowed for the assessment of transmission within participant households through collection of additional data and stool samples from a subset of their household members. Using this active surveillance platform, we sought to identify individual- and household-level risk factors for viral AGE transmission by comparing households that experienced secondary cases with those that did not.

METHODS

We leveraged data collected from KPNW members enrolled as part of the MAAGE study. A detailed description of the surveillance methods has been published previously [15]. To summarize, from April 2014 to September 2016, we identified KPNW members of all ages with MAAGE, defined as any encounter—including email, telephone, or video visit; ambulatory care clinic, urgent care, or emergency department visit; or hospital admission—within the KPNW health care delivery system for which an AGE-related ICD code (for in-person encounters) or an AGE-related chief complaint (for remote encounters) was documented (Supplementary Table 1). An age-stratified representative sample was selected, and participants were contacted via telephone within 10 days of their MAAGE encounters. Patients who provided consent were asked to complete a baseline survey at recruitment and a follow-up survey 2 weeks following enrollment.

The baseline interview collected information on demographic characteristics, current illness symptoms, symptom onset and end dates, and information on possible exposures. Information on household size, household members' gender and age, and presence of AGE symptoms (including start and end dates) was also collected. A follow-up interview was conducted 2 weeks after enrollment to assess resolution of previously reported symptoms and whether any of the healthy household members identified at the baseline survey subsequently developed AGE symptoms. Household members with AGE symptoms at the time of the baseline or follow-up survey were queried for symptom and exposure history. Household members did not have to be a KPNW member and may or may not have sought medical care.

MAAGE participants and household members with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms (defined as AGE symptoms with duration ≥30 days; 329 MAAGE participants, 1 household member) and those with missing/unclear onset or end dates (2 MAAGE participants, 1 household member) were excluded to focus on acute cases with gastrointestinal symptoms. Households with a size of 1 (n = 373) were also excluded from our analysis.

Primary, Secondary, and Household Contact Definitions

Primary cases were individuals with the earliest symptom onset date in a household who were positive for any of the following enteric viruses tested: norovirus, sapovirus, astrovirus, or rotavirus. All individuals residing at the same address as the primary case were considered household contacts (HHCs). Secondary cases were HHCs with AGE symptom onset between 1 and 7 calendar days from the primary case's symptom onset date. Households with multiple primary cases based on onset date (n = 53) or primary cases requiring hospitalized were excluded from our analysis (n = 8). The attack rate among HHCs was calculated as the number of secondary cases divided by the total number of HHCs (secondary attack rate).

Individual-Level Risk Factors for Transmission

To identify potential risk factors that contributed to secondary transmission of viral AGE among HHCs, we assessed the following primary case characteristics: age, exposures within the last 7 days (ie, travel outside the United States, eating food at restaurants/fast food/vendors, contact with diapered children or adults, eating food prepared by others at a potluck/event, contact with children in day care or nursery school, and contact with persons living in a nursing home), symptom duration, contact with persons with AGE symptoms, and type of virus detected. We also assessed the contribution of household size (<3 and ≥3) and HHC age (<5, 5–17, 18–64, ≥65 years) to individual-level transmission dynamics. We used generalized estimating equation logistic regression with an exchangeable correlation matrix with household as the cluster to assess factors associated with AGE among HHCs. Covariates with P < .2 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model by a manual backward elimination method.

Household-Level Risk Factors for Transmission

To evaluate risk factors for household-level transmission, we categorized households into transmission and nontransmission households and compared characteristics. Households with ≥1 secondary case were categorized as transmission households, and those not meeting this definition were categorized as nontransmission households. In addition to the characteristics included in the individual-level analysis, we assessed household income as a potential risk factor. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess this outcome. Covariates with P < .2 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model by a manual backward elimination method.

Collinearity was assessed in the individual- and household-level models, and no variables were collinear. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess whether primary cases aged <5 years were driving the transmission and to explore the impact of modifying the secondary case definition on transmission dynamics.

Stool Collection

All recruited study participants (patients with MAAGE and symptomatic household members) were asked to self-collect a stool sample and submit for viral pathogen testing within 7 days of collection. Samples were tested for norovirus, sapovirus, astrovirus, and rotavirus RNA at the Oregon State Public Health Laboratory using TaqMan real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction protocols developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as described previously [15].

Patient Consent Statement

The study obtained a waiver of signed consent, and all participants provided verbal informed consent at enrollment. This project was reviewed and approved by the KPNW institutional review board (FWA00002344).

RESULTS

Participant Description

From April 2014 to September 2016, 3667 eligible participants with MAAGE and 288 symptomatic household members agreed to participate and provided stool samples for testing. Of these, 3610 (98%) MAAGE participant samples and 284 (99%) household member samples were tested for viral enteric pathogens. A total of 2906 MAAGE participants and 279 household members were subsequently included in our study after exclusion of participants with chronic AGE, a household size of 1, and missing/unclear onset or end dates (Supplementary Figure 1). Of these, 631 participants met the primary case definition. After exclusion of hospitalized primary cases and multiple primary cases within households, 570 primary cases with 1479 HHCs were ultimately included in our analysis. Among all HHCs, 338 symptomatic individuals met the secondary case definition and were classified as secondary cases (Figure 1). Of the 570 households, 209 (37%) were categorized as transmission households.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ofad619f1.jpg

Participants with medically attended acute gastroenteritis (MAAGE) and household members (HHMs) included in the analysis, April 2014–September 2016. *Norovirus, rotavirus, sapovirus, and astrovirus. AGE, acute gastroenteritis.

Primary and Secondary Case Characteristics

Among primary cases, the median age was 7 years, 53% were male, 75% were White, and 15% were of Hispanic ethnicity. The median AGE symptom duration among primary cases was 5 days. Common exposures reported by primary cases included eating at a restaurant/fast food/vendor (71%), having contact with a diapered child or adult (51%), and being exposed to children in day care or nursery school (43%) in the past 7 days (Table 1). Of all primary cases <5 years of age with data available on vaccination status (n = 213), 201 (94%) received rotavirus vaccine.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Primary and Secondary Cases, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, April 2014–September 2016

Cases, Median (Range) or No. (%)
CharacteristicPrimary (n = 570)Secondary (n = 338)a
Age, y7 (0–96)28 (0–89)
Symptom duration, d5 (0–30)4 (1–32)
Age group, y
 0–4244 (43)53 (16)
 5–1782 (14)61 (18)
 18–64151 (26)206 (61)
 ≥6593 (16)18 (5)
Gender: male301 (53)180 (53)
Race
 White427 (75)81 (85)
 Black14 (2)3 (3)
 Asian22 (4)4 (4)
 Multiple races specified53 (9)2 (2)
 Other37 (7)4 (4)
 Unknown4 (1)1 (1)
 Refused2 (0.3)0 (0)
Hispanic ethnicity88 (15)7 (8)
Education of primary caseb
 Less than high school7 (3)2 (4)
 High school equivalent60 (25)7 (14)
 Some college82 (34)14 (27)
 College graduate93 (38)28 (55)
 Don’t know1 (0.4)0
 Refused1 (0.4)0
Symptomc
 Diarrhea539 (95)81 (85)
 Vomiting423 (74)74 (78)
 Fever271 (48)36 (38)
 Headache249 (44)49 (52)
 Muscle ache235 (41)58 (61)
 Abdominal pain425 (75)77 (76)
 Lethargy472 (83)80 (84)
 Chills250 (44)38 (40)
 Nausea450 (79)79 (83)
 Bloody stool15 (3)4 (4)
Exposure characteristicsd
 Travel outside US17 (3)4 (4)
 Dine at a restaurant/fast food/vendor402 (71)66 (69)
 Consume food at potluck/event172 (30)24 (25)
Contact with
 Diapered children/adult289 (51)76 (81)
 Children in day care/nursery240 (43)54 (57)
 Person at nursing home43 (8)2 (2)

aData available only for 102 secondary cases. Age and gender information available for all secondary cases.

bEducation information available for individuals aged >18 years: primary cases, n = 259; secondary, cases, n = 55.

cSymptoms are not mutually exclusive.

dIn the 7 days prior to symptom onset.

Among secondary cases, the median age was 28 years, 53% were male, 85% were White, and 8% were of Hispanic ethnicity. The median AGE symptom duration among secondary cases was 4 days. The most common exposure reported by secondary cases was having contact with a diapered child or adult (81%), followed by having eaten at a restaurant/fast food/vendor (69%) and having contact with children in day care or nursery (57%) in the past 7 days (Table 1). Secondary cases most frequently cited symptom onset within 2 days (25%) of the primary case's symptom onset date (Supplementary Figure 2).

Virus Distribution

Of the 4 viruses tested, norovirus (53%) was the most prevalent viral pathogen detected among primary cases, followed by sapovirus (24%), astrovirus (14%), and rotavirus (12%). Among norovirus-positive primary cases, GII was the predominant genogroup (89%).

Attack Rates

Of 1479 HHCs, 338 met the secondary case definition, leading to an overall secondary attack rate of 23% (338/1479). Children <5 years of age had the highest secondary attack rate (36%); those for HHCs aged 5 to 17 years and 18 to 64 years were similar (24% and 21%, respectively); and seniors aged >65 years had a lower secondary attack rate (16%; Figure 2).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is ofad619f2.jpg

Secondary attack rate for acute gastroenteritis by age groups among household contacts of viral positive primary cases, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, April 2014–September 2016.

Risk Factors for AGE Among HHCs

HHCs had significantly higher odds of secondary transmission if they were <5 years of age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2–2.6) or if the primary case in their household was aged <5 years (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4–3.6) or between 5 and 17 years (aOR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.9–5.7). HHCs were also more likely to acquire AGE if the primary case was positive for norovirus (aOR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.9–3.7), had diapered contact 7 days prior to symptom onset (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6–3.1), had symptoms for ≥4 days (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.1), or reported vomiting (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1–2.4; Table 2).

Table 2.

Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis With Generalized Estimating Equations: Risk Factors for Transmission of Viral Gastroenteritis Among Household Contacts, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, April 2014–September 2016

Univariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
Secondary Cases, No.Total Household Contacts, No.Attack Rate, %OR (95% CI) P ValueaaOR (95% CI) P Value
Household characteristics
Household size ≥3
 No22138161 [Reference]
 Yes3161341241.7 (1.1–2.7).032
Household contact characteristics
Age, y
 <552144361.9 (1.3–2.7).0011.8 (1.2–2.6).006
 5–1761257241.3 (.9–1.7).1491.3 (.9–1.8).130
 18–64206960211 [Reference]
 ≥6518114160.7 (.4–1.2).2961.1 (.6–2.1).757
Primary case characteristics
Duration of symptoms >4 d
 No163794211 [Reference]
 Yes175716261.3 (.9–1.8).0801.5 (1.1–2.1).024
Diarrhea
 No2093221 [Reference]
 Yes3181386231.01 (.5–1.93).967
Vomiting
 No56353161 [Reference]
 Yes2821126251.7 (1.2–2.5).0071.6 (1.1–2.4).032
Age, y
 <5200746272.4 (1.5–3.7)<.0012.2 (1.4–3.6)<.001
 5–1773273272.4 (1.4–4.1)<.0013.3 (1.9–5.7)<.001
 18–6447347141 [Reference]
 ≥6518113161.2 (.7–2.2).5281.6 (.7–3.5).223
Exposuresb
Travel outside US
 No3291430231 [Reference]
 Yes738180.6 (.2–2.0).472
Dine at a restaurant/fast food/vendor
 No105441241 [Reference]
 Yes2391017230.9 (.6–1.2).621
Contact with diapered children/adult
 No105676161 [Reference]
 Yes226772292.3 (1.6–3.1)<.0012.2 (1.6–3.2)<.001
Consume food at potluck/event
 No2331002231 [Reference]
 Yes94459200.9 (.6–1.2).386
Contact with person at nursing home
 No3201369231 [Reference]
 Yes1693170.8 (.4–1.5).441
Contact with children in day care/nursery
 No164814201 [Reference]
 Yes173644271.6 (1.1–2.2).001
Type of viral pathogen detected
Norovirus
 Negative106601151 [Reference]
 Positive232772302.3 (1.7–3.2)<.0012.7 (1.9–3.7)<.0001
Rotavirus
 Negative3121301241 [Reference]
 Positive26178150.6 (.3–.9).014
Astrovirus
 Negative3091250251 [Reference]
 Positive29229130.5 (.3–.8).002
Sapovirus
 Negative2791136251 [Reference]
 Positive59343170.7 (.5–.9).030

Household contacts, n = 1479; secondary cases, n = 338.

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; OR, odds ratio.

a P < .2 was included in the multivariate analysis.

bIn the 7 days prior to symptom onset.

We found lower odds of secondary transmission among HHCs if the primary case was positive for rotavirus (odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, .3–.9); however, this association was not significant in the adjusted multivariate model.

Risk Factors for Transmission vs Nontransmission Household

Households that reported AGE transmission were more likely to have ≥3 members (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1–4.5) or have a primary case aged <5 years (aOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4–4.1) or between 5 and 17 years (aOR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.8–6.8). Higher odds of transmission were also found among households if the primary case was norovirus positive (aOR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3–3.0) or had contact with a diapered child/adult (aOR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3–2.9) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis: Risk Factors Among Transmission vs Nontransmission Households, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, April 2014–September 2016

Household, No. (%)Univariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
Transmission (n = 209)Nontransmission (n = 361)OR (95% CI) P ValueaaOR (95% CI) P Value
Household characteristics
Household size
 Median (range)4 (2–7)3 (2–10)
 Members ≥3187 (89)245 (68)4.0 (2.5–6.6)<.0012.1 (1.1–4.5).043
Household income, $
 ≤75 00086 (41)155 (43)1 [Reference]
 >75 00093 (45)147 (41)1.1 (.8–1.7).487
 Unknown22 (11)45 (12)0.9 (.5–1.6).666
 Refused8 (4)14 (4)1.0 (.4–2.6).949
Primary case characteristics
Age, y
 <5102 (56)129 (36)3.2 (2.0–5.3)<.00012.4 (1.4–4.1).002
 5–1735 (19)40 (11)3.5 (1.9–6.4)<.00013.5 (1.8–6.8)<.001
 18–6429 (16)116 (32)1 [Reference]
 ≥6515 (8)74 (21)0.8 (.4–1.6).5501.2 (.5–2.7).693
Exposuresb
 Travel outside US4 (2)13 (4)0.5 (.2–1.6).244
 Dine at a restaurant/fast food/vendor145 (70)257 (72)0.9 (.6–1.3).611
 Contact with a diapered children/adult133 (65)156 (44)2.3 (1.6–3.3)<.0011.9 (1.3–2.9).003
 Consume food at potluck/event61 (30)141 (31)0.9 (.7–1.4).775
 Contact with person at nursing home14 (7)29 (8)0.8 (.4–1.6).540
 Contact with children in day care/nursery106 (51)134 (38)1.7 (1.2–2.4).002
Type of viral pathogen detected
 Norovirus127 (61)174 (48)1.7 (1.2–2.4).0042.0 (1.3–3.0)<.001
 Rotavirus23 (11)46 (12)0.9 (.5–1.5).604
 Astrovirus22 (11)58 (16)0.6 (.4–1.0).069
 Sapovirus43 (21)94 (26)0.7 (.5–1.1).142

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; OR, odds ratio.

a P < .2 was included in the multivariate analysis.

bIn the 7 days prior to symptom onset.

Sensitivity Analyses

Sensitivity analysis to explore transmission among HHCs of primary cases aged <5 years showed higher odds of transmission among HHCs with primary cases who had diarrhea, had a diapered contact, or were positive for norovirus. Modifying the secondary case definition time frame from 1–7 days to 2–7 days from primary case symptom onset did not change the original result.

DISCUSSION

Although enteric viruses are known to be highly transmissible, literature on factors affecting household transmission of viral AGE is limited. We addressed this gap by not only identifying individual-level risk factors that affect transmission of AGE within households but also understanding characteristics of households that experienced transmission vs those that did not. Our individual- and household-level assessment showed increased transmission of viral AGE if primary cases were aged <5 or 5–17 years vs 18–64 years, were exposed to diapered children or adults in the 7 days prior to symptom onset, or were positive for norovirus. Additionally, we found that HHCs were more likely to acquire AGE if the primary case reported vomiting or had a longer duration of symptoms. Larger households (≥3 members) were more likely to have increased transmission of viral AGE.

Children play an important role in household AGE transmission. Younger primary cases (<5 or 5–17 years) were more likely to lead to AGE transmission within a household in both our analyses. Additionally, HHCs <5 years of age showed higher odds of acquiring AGE from a primary case. These findings are similar to those reported in a cross-sectional study conducted in the United Kingdom by de Lusignan et al, which revealed a higher AGE incidence rate among households with preschool children as compared with other age groups [16]. Our results are also consistent with a retrospective household survey conducted in Japan that reported a higher secondary attack risk of AGE among HHCs of index cases who were 0 to 14 years of age vs other age groups [17]. Götz et al analyzed a large foodborne outbreak among children and staff at day care centers in Sweden and determined that children were more likely to cause transmission of norovirus-like AGE within households as compared with adults [13]. Thus, targeting prevention strategies such as isolation, disinfection, and interventions (eg, vaccination) in this population could reduce transmission and have indirect beneficial effects on other children or adults living in the same household [18].

In our individual-level transmission assessment, we found higher secondary transmission among HHCs of primary cases with a duration of symptoms >4 days, indicating that the longer symptoms last, the possibility of spread among HHCs increases. Additionally, HHCs of primary cases with vomiting were more likely to acquire AGE in our study, suggesting higher transmissibility among patients exposed to vomiting. This supports prior evidence indicating a higher risk of secondary transmission on exposure to vomiting in individuals who were virus positive, especially with norovirus [12, 13, 19]. Vomiting can cause significant environmental contamination and effectively result in transmission through fomites and airborne droplets [20]. Prevention strategies—such as cleaning and disinfecting surfaces with bleach-based cleaners, cleaning soiled laundry, and regular hand washing—are simple but important measures that can prevent transmission.

A large proportion of primary cases in our analysis were <5 years (44%) of age, while most secondary cases fell between 18 and 49 years (57%) vs other age categories within each group. Younger children (<5 years) or school-going children (5–17 years) are highly likely to get exposed to AGE in communal settings such as day cares, preschools, or schools, as these are common settings for viral AGE outbreaks [4, 21] and may lead to transmission among caregivers or parents [22]. This is consistent with studies showing a higher risk of viral AGE among children attending day care and is associated with transmission in parents of day care attendees [22, 23]. Individuals in direct contact with diapered children or adults were more likely to transmit viral AGE in both our analyses. Restricting our analyses to primary cases <5 years of age showed increased secondary transmission among HHCs when primary cases had diarrhea. These findings indicate a high exposure risk when handling younger children with AGE and emphasize the need for appropriate hygiene practices among those caring for sick children.

Of the 4 viruses tested, norovirus was the most common pathogen (54%) detected. We found that HHCs of norovirus-positive primary cases were more likely to acquire AGE in our individual-level risk factor analysis for transmission. Additionally, our household-level assessment demonstrated higher odds of transmission among households with norovirus-positive primary cases. This is consistent with a household survey–based cohort study conducted in the Netherlands demonstrating a high burden of norovirus transmission within households [24]. A recent case-control study among US veteran population also identified contact with an individual with AGE within a household to be a risk factor for norovirus-associated AGE [14]. Our findings are similar to those from a household transmission study conducted in Ecuador reporting norovirus transmissibility among one-third of HHCs of symptomatic children [25].

We observed that rotavirus-positive primary cases were less likely to cause secondary transmission among HHCs. Although not statistically significant in multivariate analysis, this may be attributed to the high rotavirus vaccination rates (94%) in the population and underscores the importance of norovirus vaccination in preventing the risk of transmission among close contacts [26].

Our study had limited interview data available for a small number of symptomatic HHCs (n = 102), although we were able to obtain age, gender, and symptom onset and end dates from the MAAGE patient baseline survey for those HHCs who were not interviewed (n = 1448). Additionally, our definition of secondary case included HHCs with symptom onset 1 to 7 calendar days from the primary case onset, which may have misclassified those who were exposed on the same day as the primary case but developed symptoms 1 to 2 days after the primary case’s onset. However, we did not find any changes in the results when the time frame for the secondary case definition was changed to 2 to 7 days from the primary case’s onset. Our stool samples were tested only for viral pathogens, making our analysis generalizable to viral AGE rather than all-cause AGE, and it was unclear what proportion of all-cause AGE may be due to nonviral pathogens or co-detections. The questionnaire did not collect data on behavioral factors such as household cleaning/disinfection or personal hygiene practices, which is important in understanding transmission among those who reside in the same household; thus, we were unable to account for the considerable role that behaviors related to hygiene and disinfection may have contributed.

Our findings suggest that children aged <5 years and school-age children aged 5 to 17 years play a major role in household transmission of viral AGE. To reduce transmission of viral AGE, it is important to target prevention messaging to parents. caregivers, schools and day care facilities and emphasize the importance of measures such as hand hygiene, cleaning and disinfection of surfaces, proper handling of diapers, and isolation of sick contacts. Norovirus was the most frequently detected pathogen among primary viral AGE cases and a risk factor for transmission of AGE across households and HHCs, highlighting the infectiousness and transmissibility of the pathogen among close contacts. With norovirus vaccines in development, our findings support the need to consider young children as a target population to help break the chain of transmission within households and in communities.

Supplementary Material

ofad619_Supplementary_Data

Contributor Information

Neha Balachandran, Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Cherokee Nation Assurance, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Claire P Mattison, Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Cherokee Nation Assurance, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Laura E Calderwood, Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Cherokee Nation Assurance, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Rachel M Burke, Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Mark A Schmidt, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Judy Donald, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Sara A Mirza, Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.

Notes

Acknowledgments. We thank the study site participants for their time and contributions. Additionally, we acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions to the study: Dr Aron Hall, Dr Julia Baker, and Suzanne B. Salas.

Disclaimer. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the US government. Takeda had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention received no funding from Takeda.

Financial support. This work was supported by institutional research funding from the CDC Foundation and through investigator-initiated research grants from Takeda Vaccines, Inc (IISR-2015-101015 and IISR-2017-101938), with M. A. S. as the recipient.

References

1. GBD 2016 Diarrhoeal Disease Collaborators. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoea in 195 countries: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Infect Dis  2018; 18:1211–28. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
2. Bányai  K, Estes  MK, Martella  V, Parashar  UD. Viral gastroenteritis. Lancet  2018; 392:175–86. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
3. Mattison  CP, Dunn  M, Wikswo  ME, et al.  Non-norovirus viral gastroenteritis outbreaks reported to the National Outbreak Reporting System, USA, 2009–2018. Emerg Infect Dis  2021; 27:560–4. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
4. Wikswo  ME, Roberts  V, Marsh  Z, et al.  Enteric illness outbreaks reported through the National Outbreak Reporting System—United States, 2009–2019. Clin Infect Dis  2022; 74:1906–13. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
5. Teunis  PF, Moe  CL, Liu  P, et al.  Norwalk virus: how infectious is it?  J Med Virol  2008; 80:1468–76. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
6. Burke  RM, Mattison  CP, Marsh  Z, et al.  Norovirus and other viral causes of medically attended acute gastroenteritis across the age spectrum: results from the medically attended acute gastroenteritis study in the United States. Clin Infect Dis  2021; 73:e913–20. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
7. Chhabra  P, Payne  DC, Szilagyi  PG, et al.  Etiology of viral gastroenteritis in children <5 years of age in the United States, 2008–2009. J Infect Dis  2013; 208:790–800. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
8. de Wit  MA, Koopmans  MP, van Duynhoven  YT. Risk factors for norovirus, Sapporo-like virus, and group A rotavirus gastroenteritis. Emerg Infect Dis  2003; 9:1563–70. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
9. Wu  CY, Chi  H, Liu  CC, et al.  Clinical characteristics and risk factors for children with norovirus gastroenteritis in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect  2021; 54:909–17. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
10. Wikswo  ME, Parashar  UD, Lopman  B, et al.  Evidence for household transmission of rotavirus in the United States, 2011–2016. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc  2020; 9:181–7. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
11. Marsh  ZA, Grytdal  SP, Beggs  JC, et al.  The unwelcome houseguest: secondary household transmission of norovirus. Epidemiol Infect  2018; 146:159–67. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
12. Perry  S, de la Luz Sanchez  M, Hurst  PK, Parsonnet  J. Household transmission of gastroenteritis. Emerg Infect Dis  2005; 11:1093–6. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
13. Götz  H, Ekdahl  K, Lindbäck  J, de Jong  B, Hedlund  KO, Giesecke  J. Clinical spectrum and transmission characteristics of infection with Norwalk-like virus: findings from a large community outbreak in Sweden. Clin Infect Dis  2001; 33:622–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
14. Balachandran  N, Cates  J, Kambhampati  AK, et al.  Risk factors for acute gastroenteritis among patients hospitalized in 5 Veterans Affairs medical centers, 2016–2019. Open Forum Infect Dis  2022; 9:ofac339. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
15. Schmidt  MA, Groom  HC, Naleway  AL, et al.  A model for rapid, active surveillance for medically-attended acute gastroenteritis within an integrated health care delivery system. PLoS One  2018; 13:e0201805. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
16. de Lusignan  S, Sherlock  J, Ferreira  F, O’Brien  S, Joy  M. Household presentation of acute gastroenteritis in a primary care sentinel network: retrospective database studies. BMC Public Health  2020; 20:445. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
17. Matsuyama  R, Miura  F, Tsuzuki  S, Nishiura  H. Household transmission of acute gastroenteritis during the winter season in Japan. J Int Med Res  2018; 46:2866–74. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
18. Baker  JM, Dahl  RM, Cubilo  J, Parashar  UD, Lopman  BA. Effects of the rotavirus vaccine program across age groups in the United States: analysis of national claims data, 2001–2016. BMC Infect Dis  2019; 19:186. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
19. Adams  C, Young  D, Gastañaduy  PA, et al.  Quantifying the roles of vomiting, diarrhea, and residents vs staff in norovirus transmission in US nursing home outbreaks. PLoS Comput Biol  2020; 16:e1007271. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
20. Kirby  AE, Streby  A, Moe  CL. Vomiting as a symptom and transmission risk in norovirus illness: evidence from human challenge studies. PLoS One  2016; 11:e0143759. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
21. Mattison  CP, Calderwood  LE, Marsh  ZA, et al.  Childcare and school acute gastroenteritis outbreaks: 2009–2020. Pediatrics  2022; 150:e2021056002. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
22. Sacri  AS, De Serres  G, Quach  C, Boulianne  N, Valiquette  L, Skowronski  DM. Transmission of acute gastroenteritis and respiratory illness from children to parents. Pediatr Infect Dis J  2014; 33:583–8. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
23. Heusinkveld  M, Mughini-Gras  L, Pijnacker  R, et al.  Potential causative agents of acute gastroenteritis in households with preschool children: prevalence, risk factors, clinical relevance and household transmission. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis  2016; 35:1691–700. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
24. Quee  FA, de Hoog  MLA, Schuurman  R, Bruijning-Verhagen  P. Community burden and transmission of acute gastroenteritis caused by norovirus and rotavirus in the Netherlands (RotaFam): a prospective household-based cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis  2020; 20:598–606. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
25. Gastañaduy  PA, Vicuña  Y, Salazar  F, et al.  Transmission of norovirus within households in Quininde, Ecuador. Pediatr Infect Dis J  2015; 34:1031–3. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
26. Cortese  MM, Dahl  RM, Curns  AT, Parashar  UD. Protection against gastroenteritis in US households with children who received rotavirus vaccine. J Infect Dis  2015; 211:558–62. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Open Forum Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

Citations & impact 


This article has not been cited yet.

Impact metrics

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/157422561
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/157422561