Abstract
Purpose
Women remain underrepresented in medical physics in the United States, and determinants of persisting disparities remain unclear. Here, we performed a detailed investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) membership trajectories to evaluate trends in Full membership with respect to gender, age, and highest degree.Methods and materials
Membership data, including gender, date of birth, highest degree, membership type, and years of active membership for 1993 to 2023 were obtained from AAPM. Group 1 included Full members who joined AAPM in 1993 or later. A subset of group 1 including only members who joined and left AAPM since 1993 (former members, group 1F) was used to calculate age at membership cessation and duration. Results were compared by gender and highest degree. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was also used to evaluate membership "survival" by age and highest degree.Results
Complete data were available for 6647 current and former Full members (group 1), including 2211 former members (group 1F). On average, women became Full members at a significantly younger age than men (34.6 vs 37.5 years of age, P < .001) and ended their memberships (if applicable) at a significantly younger age than men (46.1 vs 50.1 years of age, P < .001). The Kaplan-Meier "survival" analysis showed that for a given age, women were at a significantly greater risk of membership cessation than men, and women with master's degrees had the lowest membership survival of any gender/degree subgroup. When analyzing by membership duration, there was no difference in survival by gender alone. Still, women with PhDs were found to have the greatest membership survival among gender/degree subgroups.Conclusions
Both gender and degree type influenced AAPM membership trajectories. Although we have offered a discussion of possible explanations, qualitative data collected from both continuing and departing AAPM members will be critical in the ongoing journey toward gender parity in the profession of medical physics.Citations & impact
This article has not been cited yet.
Impact metrics
Alternative metrics
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/159881981
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
The state of gender diversity in medical physics.
Med Phys, 47(4):2038-2043, 12 Feb 2020
Cited by: 14 articles | PMID: 31970801 | PMCID: PMC7217161
Diversity and Professional Advancement in Medical Physics.
Adv Radiat Oncol, 8(1):101057, 27 Aug 2022
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 36213550 | PMCID: PMC9539787
Female Physicians Are Underrepresented in Recognition Awards from the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
PM R, 9(10):976-984, 21 Mar 2017
Cited by: 30 articles | PMID: 28336430
American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263: Standardizing Nomenclatures in Radiation Oncology.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 100(4):1057-1066, 15 Dec 2017
Cited by: 70 articles | PMID: 29485047 | PMCID: PMC7437157
Review Free full text in Europe PMC