Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Ferritin is a multivalent, self-assembling protein scaffold found in most human cell types, in addition to being present in invertebrates, higher plants, fungi, and bacteria, that offers an attractive alternative to polymer-based drug delivery systems (DDS). In this study, the utility of the ferritin cage as a DDS was demonstrated within the context of T cell agonism for tumor killing. Members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) are attractive targets for the development of anticancer therapeutics. These receptors are endogenously activated by trimeric ligands that occur in transmembrane or soluble forms, and oligomerization and cell-surface anchoring have been shown to be essential aspects of the targeted agonism of this receptor class. Here, we demonstrated that the ferritin cage could be easily tailored for multivalent display of anti-OX40 antibody fragments on its surface and determined that these arrays are capable of pathway activation through cell-surface clustering. Together, these results confirm the utility, versatility, and developability of ferritin as a DDS.

Free full text 


Logo of acssdLink to Publisher's site
Bioconjugate Chemistry
Bioconjug Chem. 2024 May 15; 35(5): 593–603.
PMCID: PMC11099885
PMID: 38592684

Adapting Ferritin, a Naturally Occurring Protein Cage, to Modulate Intrinsic Agonism of OX40

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Abstract

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bc4c00020_0006.jpg

Ferritin is a multivalent, self-assembling protein scaffold found in most human cell types, in addition to being present in invertebrates, higher plants, fungi, and bacteria, that offers an attractive alternative to polymer-based drug delivery systems (DDS). In this study, the utility of the ferritin cage as a DDS was demonstrated within the context of T cell agonism for tumor killing. Members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) are attractive targets for the development of anticancer therapeutics. These receptors are endogenously activated by trimeric ligands that occur in transmembrane or soluble forms, and oligomerization and cell-surface anchoring have been shown to be essential aspects of the targeted agonism of this receptor class. Here, we demonstrated that the ferritin cage could be easily tailored for multivalent display of anti-OX40 antibody fragments on its surface and determined that these arrays are capable of pathway activation through cell-surface clustering. Together, these results confirm the utility, versatility, and developability of ferritin as a DDS.

Introduction

Drug delivery systems (DDS) are becoming increasingly important in the advancement of novel therapeutics. DDS can be defined as systems that enhance therapeutic substances by modulating their pharmacokinetics (PK), toxicity, stability, or efficacy. DDS are typically leveraged for one or more of the following reasons: to enhance absorption into specific tissues, to prevent degradation in the biological environment, to improve intracellular delivery, or to control PK and drug distribution profiles. While synthetic polymeric scaffolds are commonly employed in DDS, their biocompatibility and the fate of the polymer metabolites are often of concern. On the other hand, there exist a myriad of natural polymer systems, including proteins, starch, cellulose, hyaluronic acid, and DNA which offer attractive alternatives.

Among them, protein-based nanocages such as viruses, ferritin, and others are of particular interest due to the cage-like structures being formed through self-assembly of protein subunits, which offers the advantage of being able to be made entirely recombinantly. Ferritin, a member of the iron storage family of proteins, is made up of 24 subunits held together by noncovalent interactions, arranged into an icosahedral cage with 2-, 3-, and 4-fold axes of symmetry around a central cavity.1,2 Ferritin possesses many attractive features36 as a DDS. First, it is amenable to both chemical conjugation79 and molecular engineering techniques, for example, through the addition of a peptide or protein tag.1012 Second, ferritin is highly conserved among higher eukaryotes and therefore poses minimal risk of toxicity or immunological activity.7 Third, because both the monomer and the assembled cage are monodisperse entities, it is simpler to analyze compared with other delivery technologies such as polydisperse polymers or liposomes. Perhaps most importantly, the multivalency of displayed amino acid side chains, either on the external surface or internally when iron is not being stored in its central cavity, endows ferritin with the potential to carry therapeutic cargo.

Members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) have long been attractive targets for the development of anticancer therapeutics. They operate in many organ systems and play a prominent role in important biological processes including regulation of immunity, cell proliferation, and cell death.13 These receptors are endogenously activated by ligands that occur as trimeric transmembrane proteins or as soluble trimeric molecules, and oligomerization and cell-surface anchoring are known to be essential aspects of targeted agonism of this receptor class.1316 Because cognate ligands of these receptors have generally made suboptimal drugs due to poor production, stability, or PK, thus far, the most common therapeutic modality advanced for this receptor class has been the monoclonal antibody (mAb). However, a significant challenge for the pharmacologic agonism of these receptors by mAbs is the general requirement for receptor oligomerization or superclustering to achieve valencies beyond two.1719 While cross-linking of agonist anti-TNFRSF antibodies can be achieved in vitro by artificially coating on plates or by using secondary cross-linking reagents, in vivo cross-linking activity generally relies on extrinsic cross-linking from Fc engagement with Fc γ receptors (FcγRs) on immune cells.16,20,21 This has had a significant impact on the clinical development of therapeutic antibody formats attempting to activate TNFRSFs. Despite the advancement of a large pipeline of TNFRSF agonist antibodies into development, none has been approved or reached late stage clinical trials, and several have been withdrawn.13,14,16,2224

While a variety of IgG-like and non-IgG-like formats have been developed,25 including triabodies, tetrabodies, pentabodies, self-assembling hexameric IgG antibodies, nanoparticle and cross-linked micelle conjugates,2631 to expand valencies beyond 2, developability considerations relating to PK, safety, and physical and chemical properties have impeded advancement of these formats to the clinic. Thus, a need for multivalent delivery strategies with favorable developability properties still exists, enabling the in vivo potency needed to drive clinically relevant efficacy. Since ferritin is a biocompatible, naturally occurring icosahedron, it is an attractive scaffold for multivalent engagement of TNFRSF receptors with the potential to facilitate the superclustering necessary to drive TNFRSF signaling.

In the present study, a recombinant version of the human ferritin light chain (rFer24) was designed that includes a reactive glutamine residue embedded in a peptide sequence (Q-tag) recognized by microbial transglutaminase (mTG). In parallel, a lysine residue was embedded in an mTG-reactive peptide sequence (K-tag) into the C-terminus of the heavy chain of a recombinant anti-OX40 human IgG1 antibody fragment (Fab). Site-specific conjugation of Fab-K-tag to each ferritin monomer (rFerm) containing a Q-tag proceeded through enzymatic bioconjugation catalyzed by mTG to form a Q–K isopeptide bond, resulting in a multivalent ferritin–Fab conjugate. In-depth characterization of rFer24 and rFer24-Fab conjugates were performed under native and denaturing conditions. The in vitro agonist activities of rFer24-Fab conjugates with varying anti-OX40 Fab densities were compared to that of a previously developed IgG format that depends on extrinsic cross-linking both in vitro and in vivo. Moderate agonism was reported for a valency of 4, while highly potent activity was observed only for a hexameric IgG format, which had a valency of 12.28 The objectives of the present study were to (i) investigate whether the rFer24-Fab conjugate was capable of in vitro agonism of the OX40 pathway without relying on extrinsic cross-linking and, if so, (ii) determine how activity depends on Fab valency. Positive outcomes confirm that ferritin is a promising DDS for multivalent agonism.

Results and Discussion

Results

A recombinant ferritin construct was designed with the following, starting from the N-terminus (N-term): a signal sequence for protein secretion, followed by an 8xHis tag with tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage site, followed by a microbial transglutaminase (mTG) recognition sequence (Q-tag, VLQSP)32 with a flexible linker leading into the mature N-term of liver-derived ferritin light chain (LC) (SI.1). Following expression in Expi293 cells and Ni Sepharose excel purification, the His-tag was cleaved off using TEV protease, and the digested mixture was analyzed via liquid chromatography in-line with mass spectrometry (LC/MS) under denaturing conditions (Figure Figure11). As shown in Table 1, theoretical and measured masses are in good agreement with one another. Moreover, the additional minor masses visible in the top panel of Figure Figure11A correspond to His-tag truncations (SI.2); a phenomenon that has been observed when His-tagged proteins are expressed in mammalian cells, such as Expi293 cells.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bc4c00020_0001.jpg

(A) Deconvolution from LC/MS analysis after digestion using TEV protease, with a zoomed-in view in the bottom panel. Identified masses have been assigned. (B) Size exclusion chromatography in-line with a quasi-elastic light scattering detector (SEC-QELS) of rFer24 with His-tag (red trace) and after TEV protease digestion (blue trace), as well as rFer24-anti-OX40 Fab conjugate (1) and unconjugated Fab (2) from reaction 1 (green trace), overlaid with measured RH values across each peak. Averaged RH values are also reported in the legend. (C) Physical stability profiles for rFer24 and rFer24-anti-OX40 Fab24 were measured in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 25 °C over 14 days.

Table 1

Theoretical and Measured Molar Masses for rFerm, Anti-OX40 Fab and rFerm-xOX40 Fab
 theoretical molar mass (Da)measured molar mass (Da)delta (Da)
8xHis-rFerm23,022.7423,023.310.57
rFerm21,073.6921,073.940.25
anti-OX40 Fab47,742.2847,742.640.36
rFerm-xOX4068,815.9768,800.93–15.04

The recombinant ferritin cage (rFer24) was also analyzed under native conditions using size exclusion chromatography in-line with a quasi-elastic light scattering detector (SEC-QELS), both before and after cleavage of the N-term His-tag (Figure Figure11B, red and blue traces). As shown in the UV spectra, rFer24 did not exhibit aggregation, with or without the His-tag. Moreover, the SEC-QELS analysis corroborated monodispersity within each pool, as demonstrated by the narrow RH distributions across each peak.

Conjugation to rFer24 (Q-tag, VLQSP) was accomplished using an anti-OX40 Fab with mTG amine recognition sequence (RSKLG)33 engineered into the C-terminus (C-term) of the Fab heavy chain (HC) (Figure Figure22A). All mTG conjugations were set up on an rFerm basis, with initial conditions shown in Table 2 (reaction 1). SEC-QELS analysis of reaction 1 (Figure Figure11B, green trace) revealed a clear shift in retention time at A280 nm relative to rFer24 (peak 1), as well as an excess of the Fab substrate (peak 2). The increased average RH from 7.4 nm (rFer24) and 3.3 nm (anti-OX40 Fab) to 10.9 nm also corroborated successful conjugation, while the overlaid RHs across peak 1 suggested that there was also some minor polydispersity within the conjugate peak. Finally, analysis of physical stability over 14 days in PBS revealed only minor changes to the main peak area, demonstrating the stability of both rFer24 and rFer24-anti-OX40 Fab pools at physiological pH (Figure Figure11C).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bc4c00020_0002.jpg

(A) Reaction scheme showing rFer24 in magenta (Q-tag in red), anti-OX40 Fab (K-tag in cyan), and assembled rFer24 + 24 Fabs. (B) Chromatogram of absorbance at 280 nm demonstrating resolution by reverse phase (RP) between unreacted anti-OX40 Fab (1.7 min), rFerm-anti-OX40 Fab (2 min), rFerm (2.3 min), and rFerm with N-term His-tag (2.9 min) using a molar ratio of 1:0.3. (C) Representative deconvolution (top panel) with a zoomed-in view (bottom panel) around the mass of the rFerm-anti-OX40 Fab conjugate and other minor conjugate masses.

Table 2

Reaction Conditions and Calculated Yields
 concn rFerm (μM)concn Fab (μM)concn mTG (nM)stoichiometric ratio rFerm:Fabyield
reaction 1503003501:6N/D
reaction 23504003501:1.196.1
reaction 34002003501:0.537.6
reaction 44001203501:0.319.2
reaction 5400803501:0.214.2

To gain a quantitative understanding of conjugate Fab density, an analytical reverse phase (RP) method was developed, yielding baseline resolution of rFerm-Fab, Fab, and rFerm (Figure Figure22B). By integrating each UV peak, this method yielded a percent Fab density based on calculating the amount of Fab-modified rFerm versus unmodified rFerm. With the analytical method in place, further optimization of the conjugation was accomplished by increasing the reaction concentrations of the rFerm and Fab substrates. As shown in Table 2, adjusting substrate concentrations in reaction 2 led to nearly complete saturation of conjugation sites with a calculated Fab density of 96.1% as determined by the RP method. Conjugations with different ratios of Fab to rFerm were also tested, and the resulting yields are summarized in Table 2 (reactions 3–5). In general, the targeted ratios and the resulting Fab densities were in agreement with only minor differences. In addition to quantitation, peak identities were confirmed by deconvolution of ion count spectra using time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF MS), and a mass corresponding to rFerm-Fab was readily detected in deconvolutions of all conjugation reactions (Table 1 and Figure Figure22C). Secondary conjugation products, where rFerm with a ragged N-term His-tag reacted with Fab, were also detected, suggesting that the removal of the His-tag is not necessary for the conjugation to occur. The detection of the rFerm dimer and trimer in the deconvolutions suggest that there may also be a reactive K-site on rFerm, which led to low levels of rFerm cross-linking. Overall, these results demonstrated that site occupancy could be controlled by titrating the molar ratio of Fab and that conditions could be identified that achieved nearly complete site occupancy (96.1%). To further confirm site-specific conjugation, the rFer24-anti-OX40 Fab24 conjugate was also assessed by peptide mapping, and site-specific addition of K from the Fab to Q from rFerm was the predominant peptide mass detected (S1.3 and Table S1).

To gain a better understanding of spatial distribution, a rFer24-Fab24 homology model was constructed, including 24 Fabs with site-specific isopeptide bond formation (Figure Figure33). Visualization of assembled rFer24-Fab24 gives a good sense of the spatial packing of the Fabs decorating the surface of the rFer24 cage. Moreover, rFer24-Fab24 was also analyzed using negative stain and cryo-EM (Figures Figures44 and S4). Clear, high-resolution density can be seen for the rFer24 cage in both negative stain and cryo-EM class averages, suggesting that the cage is intact and stable. On the other hand, as shown in Figure Figure44, the Fabs are blurred in the averages indicating that they are flexibly linked to the rFer24, with much conformational freedom. Furthermore, using back projections of the homology model allowed for comparison of two-dimensional (2D) particle topography with the 2D averages calculated from the negative stain and cryo-EM data. Together these results give further insight into the morphology of the DDS. They also validate the suitability of this approach for multivalent conjugation by demonstrating that rFer24 is amenable to site-specific addition of up to 24 Fabs and that the resulting conjugate can be developed for therapeutic applications requiring multivalency.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bc4c00020_0003.jpg

PYMOL rendering of rFer24-anti-OX40 Fab24 from the homology model PDB file, where the rFer24 cage is in magenta and 24 repeats of the Fab moiety are in green.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bc4c00020_0004.jpg

(A) Representative 2D class averages of negatively stained rFer-OX40 and Fab24 conjugates. (B) Representative 2D class averages of rFer-OX40 Fab particles were imaged using cryo-EM. (C) Back projections of the homology model are presented in Figure Figure33.

Finally, anti-OX40 formats were tested for their ability to promote receptor signaling using engineered Jurkat cells expressing human OX40 and an NF-κB luciferase reporter (Figure Figure55). While cross-linking the natural ligand with a secondary antibody (OX40L-Fc XL) resulted in potent receptor activation, monovalent anti-OX40 Fab or bivalent anti-OX40 IgG1 failed to agonize OX40. In contrast, all ratios of rFer24-Fab led to receptor activation. At the highest Fab density (rFer24-anti-OX40 Fab with 96.1% Fab density), agonism was comparable to that of the Fab density of the OX40L-Fc XL and did not exhibit the pronounced decrease in activity observed for OX40L-Fc XL at higher concentrations. In addition, the lower Fab:rFer24 ratios demonstrated that potency is dependent on the Fab density and highlighted the ability of the rFer24 cage to titrate agonism. Finally, it should be noted that rFer24 without conjugated Fab did not produce any activity.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is bc4c00020_0005.jpg

OX40+ Jurkat reporter assay. RLU denotes relative luminescence. Molecule concentrations (nM) were calculated as follows: rFer24-Fab conjugate and aOX40 Fab concentrations were based on Fab molar mass, OX40L-Fc XL concentration was based on OX40L-Fc XL molar mass, aOX40 IgG1 concentration was based on the antibody molar mass, and rFer24 concentration was based on the molar mass of the assembled ferritin cage.

Discussion

Several ferritin-based vaccines are in clinical trials,34 and ferritin is also in-use for delivery of chemotherapy, immunotherapy and imaging.3537 The work presented here extends its use cases to another therapeutic setting through the multivalent display of Fabs to induce agonism through receptor superclustering. As a recombinant protein, rFer24 was amenable to protein engineering, where an amino acid sequence for site-specific conjugation was fused onto the rFerm N-terminus. Native analysis of the rFer24 substrate by SEC-QELS also confirmed a well-behaved, monodispersed protein. In addition, mTG was effective at catalyzing the formation of isopeptide bonds between Q on rFer24 and K on anti-OX40 Fab (Figures Figures11B, B,2B,C,2B,C, and SI.2). While initial conditions were able to produce the rFer24-Fab conjugate, further optimization of molar concentrations of each substrate led to a decrease in the Fab ratio (Table 2). This finding is likely related to the fact that mTG conjugation is Km-driven, and thus, in addition to stoichiometry, the concentration of each substrate plays a role in conjugation efficiency. Finally, the lack of major aggregation suggests that rFer24-anti-OX40 Fab is a stable, well-behaved molecule with a high potential for developability (Figure Figure11C).

To demonstrate that all 24 rFerm subunits were occupied by Fab, a RP method was established to quantitatively determine the amount of Fab-modified rFerm per cage (Figure Figure22B) and the results confirmed that nearly all 24 rFer monomers were conjugated to Fab, with 96.1% Fab coverage under optimal conditions (Table 2). We also determined that rFer24 with various ratios of Fab displayed on the surface could be assembled by controlling the stoichiometry (Table 2). Traditional analytical techniques were sufficient to demonstrate a well-behaved conjugate with minimal secondary cross-linking (Figure Figure22C, SI.3. Table S1). While the LC/MS deconvolution revealed heterogeneity of the N-term of rFerm, it also demonstrated that this heterogeneity did not interfere with reactivity since all forms of rFer24 were able to react with Fab, as indicated by the resulting conjugate masses (Figure Figure22C).

Molecular modeling indicates that the assembly of 24 Fabs onto the rFer24 scaffold is sterically possible, with enough inter-Fab distance to accommodate conformational changes (Figure Figure33). To build the homology model, the Fabs were manually placed near the engineered sequence for isopeptide bond creation; therefore, the current representation of the system is not necessarily energetically realistic. Interdomain interactions such as pH-dependent electrostatic and van der Waals interactions between the Fab domain could induce conformational changes limiting the accessibility of conjugation sites and could also impact the dynamics of the Fabs, potentially influencing oligomerization or superclustering. Due to the large size of the system (number of atoms >300 K), a thorough yet practical analysis of these effects requires coarse-grained modeling38 or atomistic multiscale modeling using implicit solvent models,39 which are beyond the current scope of our study. Nevertheless, the current model confirms the viability of spatial arrangement of the Fabs around rFer24 with enough inter-Fab distances to allow conformational flexibility, as supported by the negative stain and cryo-EM data.

Indeed, the negative stain and cryo-EM micrographs allowed for further understanding of the overall morphology of the system (Figures Figures44 and S4) and confirmed the validity of the homology model. The stark contrast in resolution between the rFer24 cage and the surrounding Fabs suggests that while the cage is in a relatively rigid conformation, the Fabs are able to move around in a variety of orientations. Moreover, back projections of the homology model allowed comparison with the 2D averages calculated from the negative stain and cryo-EM data. Although not well resolved due to their flexibility, the number of apparent Fab densities in the averages is reasonable compared to the number of Fab densities that are seen in different views of the homology model. This finding gives further insight into the conformational flexibility of the Fab domains when conjugated to the rFer24 cage.

Overall, the robust activity of the conjugates demonstrates the ability of the multivalent array to take the nonfunctional Fab and turn it into one with high activity once displayed on the rFer24 cage. This highlights the value of the rFer24 cage as a DDS, which was amenable to addition of the TG recognition sequence and was able to accommodate the display of up to 24 Fabs on its surface. Furthermore, different ratios of rFer24-anti-OX40 Fab conjugates were tested for their ability to promote receptor signaling using engineered Jurkat cells expressing human OX40 and an NF-κB luciferase reporter (Figure Figure55). While cross-linking the natural ligand with a secondary antibody (OX40L-Fc XL) resulted in potent receptor activation, monovalent anti-OX40 Fab or bivalent anti-OX40 IgG1 failed to agonize OX40. In contrast, all ratios of rFer24-anti-OX40 Fab led to receptor activation. At the highest Fab occupancy, agonism was comparable to that of the OX40L-Fc XL. Interestingly, the hook effect that was observed with the OX40L-Fc XL at Fab concentrations greater than 20 nM was less pronounced with the rFer24-anti-OX40 Fab conjugates. This decrease in activity at high OX40L-Fc XL concentrations suggests that topology may play a role in agonizing the receptor pathway. At low-to-moderate OX40L-Fc XL concentrations, it is likely that one trimeric ligand is bound to multiple receptors, whereas at high OX40L-Fc XL, it is more likely that only one receptor is bound to each trimeric ligand, leading to less potent signaling compared to the ≥2 receptors per complex case. In contrast, we hypothesize that although the anti-OX40 Fabs maintain a high degree of conformational freedom, their colocalization on the rFer24 cage impacts their interaction with the receptors by enabling a single rFer24-Fab array to cluster multiple receptors at higher molar concentrations than for OX40L-Fc XL. These observed differences suggest that geometry may play a role in pathway activation where colocalization of Fabs on the same scaffold may enhance clustering of OX40 receptors at saturating receptor concentrations. Moreover, the modulation of activity based on Fab percent occupancy was also demonstrated, highlighting the ability of the rFer24 cage to titrate agonism. Although, it was surprising to observe that rFer24-anti-OX40 (96.1% Fab) did not lead to agonism any greater than that of the cross-linked trimer, despite presenting up to 4 times as much Fab per molecule, this is attributed to reaching the upper limit of the assay range.

Overall, this study demonstrates the suitability of the rFer24 DDS for the pharmacologic agonism of this important therapeutic target class. Because cognate ligands of these receptors have generally made suboptimal drugs due to poor production, stability, or PK and mAbs have failed in the clinic due to a lack of efficacy, the rFer24 DDS constitutes a promising platform for multivalent delivery of Fabs. While therapeutic validation requires in vivo studies, this work corroborates previous proof-of-concept studies27,28 and further establishes the general utility of the ferritin cage as a DDS.

Materials and Methods

Construct Design and Expi/293T Expression and Purification

A light chain ferritin sequence derived from human liver ferritin was used to produce the recombinant ferritin (rFer) construct, based on a standard pRK vector with the protein cloned into BamH1 and EcoR1 sites.40,41 The N-terminus of the construct contained an 8xHis tag, followed by a tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage site, followed by VLQSPGGSGGGSG. This sequence was designed to be recognized by microbial transglutaminase (mTG), which catalyzes the formation of an isopeptide bond between the glutamine in the sequence and a lysine substrate (Figure Figure11).

Expression was done in Expi/293T cells (Thermo Fisher) at the 4 L scale for 14 days. Secretion medium was harvested and passed over a 5 mL column packed with Ni Sepharose excel (Millipore Sigma) using a running buffer consisting of 50 mM NaH2PO4, 200 mM NaCl, pH 8.0, spiked with 10 mM imidazole. Following on-column washing, an elution buffer consisting of the running buffer spiked with 400 mM imidazole was applied, and 1 mL fractions were collected.

TEV Protease Cleavage

The N-term His-tag was removed using a TEV protease (ATCC) at a ratio of 1:80 w/w. The digestion pool was held at room temperature for 5 h, followed by a flow through purification using a 5 mL Ni excel column to remove undigested protein as well as TEV protease. The protein pool was then dialyzed against PBS 7.4 and stored at 4 °C.

Fabs for Microbial Transglutaminase (mTG) Conjugation

The C-terminus of a Fab heavy chain was engineered to contain lysine (Lys) in a consensus sequence (RSKLG) for mTG conjugation to an anti-OX40 Fab targeting an extracellular domain (ECD) of human OX40R.

Microbial TG Chemistry

A microbial TG enzyme (mTG) derived from Streptomyces mobaraensis was used to catalyze isopeptide bond formation between Q from rFer and K from Fab, where each substrate contained a specific recognition motif designed based on previously described sequences.32 In this case, rFer was engineered to contain the N-term consensus sequence VLQSP, while Fab was engineered to contain the C-terminal sequence RSKLG. Reaction stoichiometry was calculated on a ferritin monomeric subunit basis (rFerm), as listed in Table 2. All Reactions were titrated to pH 8.0 using 1 M Tris and allowed to incubate for 18–24 h at room temperature. Following conjugation, unreacted Fab was removed by SEC (S400, 10 × 300 mm).

SEC-QELS

Determination of purity and RH of rFer proteins and conjugates under native conditions was accomplished using SEC-QELS using an Acclaim SEC-1000 analytical SEC column run on a Dionex UltiMate 3000 UHPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with isocratic elution in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) spiked with an additional 150 mM NaCl. In-line with UV detection, a multiangle laser light scattering detector (MALS detector, Wyatt Instruments) was used to determine molar mass due to Brownian motion, as well as an attached photon-counting module (QELS detector, Wyatt Instruments) to capture fluctuations in intensity of scattered laser light, allowing diffusion coefficients to be measured. Assuming a spherical shape, the Stokes–Einstein relationship was used to calculate RH from D.

Stability

Physical stability was analyzed by incubating rFer24 and rFer24-anti-OX40 Fab cells in PBS at room temperature for 14 days. At each time point, 50 μg of each sample was run on SEC (same conditions as for SEC-MALS) and the percent main peak area was calculated by compared to the peak area on day 1.

RP-MS

RP-MS was used to determine the rFerm:Fab ratios. For all gradients, mobile phase A consisted of 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water, while mobile phase B consisted of 0.05% TFA and 100% acetonitrile (ACN). Resolution of rFer, rFerm-Fab conjugates and impurities was accomplished using a reverse phase (RP) C4 column (Waters, Acquity HPLC Protein BEH C4, 2 × 150 mm), consisting of a hydrophobic alkyl chain in the stationary phase. The number of Fabs per rFer24 cage was determined by quantifying the amount of unconjugated, free rFerm using a standard curve from UV280 peak integrations of unmodified rFerm on RP. The concentration of rFerm-Fab was then calculated using eq 1

equation image
1

where 0.74 is the calculated extinction coefficient of rFerm and 1.12 is the extinction coefficient for rFerm-Fab. The percentage of rFerm-Fab conjugates (% Fab) was determined by using eq 2.

equation image
2

In addition, mass data were acquired as described previously32 using an Agilent 1290 Infinity HPLC in tandem with an Agilent 6230 ESI/TOF mass spectrometer, operating in positive ion mode.

Peptide Mapping

To prepare samples for peptide mapping, 10 μg of sample was denatured using 8 M guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl), reduced using DTT and alkylated using iodoacetamide (IAA), followed by trypsin digestion at 37 °C overnight. The samples were loaded on a desalting column (Pierce C18 Spin Tips) for the removal of impurities. Five percent of each digest was injected onto a LTQ-Orbitrap Elite MS spectrometer coupled with a nanoAcquity HPLC (Waters). Raw data were searched with Byonic and analyzed by Byologic using semitryptic search, Fixed Mod: Carbam (Cys) and Variable Mod: Oxidation (Met, pyroGln(N-term)); Cross-linked (−17.031 Da) (Lys/Gln).

Molecular Modeling

Conjugates of ferritin and anti-OX40 Fab were the components used for the molecular modeling. To begin, Human L ferritin in the PDB format (5LG8) was imported into the Molecular Operation Environment (MOE) software. The “Protein Builder” tool was used to prepend the engineered sequence to the N-terminus of each subunit. The same tool was then used to mutate the amino acids in the ferritin sequence to match those used in the experiment. The anti-OX40 Fab structure was predicted from its sequence using the antibody modeler within MOE. Twenty-four copies of the fab homology model were imported along with the ferritin structure. The “Render” tool was used to visualize the molecules in the Q residue near the N-term of the ferritin subunits and the K residue near the C-term of the anti-OX40 Fab. Each one of the 24 Fabs were selected and manually placed in proximity to the engineered sequence on the N-terminus of a ferritin subunit. The Fabs were positioned so that the terminus side chains were in the proximity to form a covalent bond. The “Molecule Builder” feature was then used to remove the amine group of the Q residue. The adjacent carbon and nitrogen on the K side chain were selected, and a bond was introduced using the Molecule Builder. This was repeated 24 times for each Fab and ferritin subunit. The system was then energy-minimized in MOE, and the PDB structure was ready to remove any local steric clashes. However, a global conformational relaxation requires extended molecular simulations, which was not pursued. Because the Fabs were manually moved into the proximity of the engineered N-term rFer24 sequence to create the isopeptide bond, the secondary structure of the peptides in this region as well as the arrangement of the atoms in the isopeptide bond are not conformationally accurate.

Negative Stain Sample Preparation

The rFer24-Fab24 sample was diluted 1:100 to a concentration of 0.03 mg/mL. 400 mesh copper, continuous-carbon/Formvar grids (Ted Pella) were used and 4 μL of sample was applied to a glow-discharged (30 s, 30 mA on GloCube) grid for 30 s before being washed two times with water and then two times with 2% uranyl acetate solution. Grids were dried before imaging.

Negative Stain Data Collection

78 negative stain micrographs were collected using a Ceta 16 M camera on a Talos 200 kV side entry microscope (Thermo Fisher). SerialEM42 was used for semiautomated data collection with nominal defocus between −2.0 and −3.0 μm.

Negative Stain Data Processing

78 micrographs were imported into cryoSPARC version 4.4.043 and CTF-corrected using CTFFIND4,44 and 62 particles were manually picked and averaged into 5 classes. Two of these class averages were used for a template pick, and 4600 putative particles were extracted for 2D classification. Two rounds of selection were performed to reduce the number of picks to 3978 particles classified into 50 classes.

Cryo-EM Sample Preparation

The rFer24-Fab24 conjugate sample was diluted to 0.75 mg/mL. UltrAufoil 200 mesh 2/2 grids were coated in self-assembled monolayers45 and double-blotted using a Vitrobot MARK IV (Thermo Fisher) for 3 s at 7 force. Grids were clipped for use with a Thermo Fisher autoloader (Nanosoft).

Cryo-EM Data Collection

10,115 micrographs were collected on a Krios G3i microscope (Thermo Fisher) with a BioQuantum energy filter and K3 camera (Gatan). Data were collected semiautomatically using a SerialEM42 image shift pattern of 6 images per hole in a 3 × 3 pattern. Nominal defocus was set to −0.8 to −1.8 μm.

Cryo-EM Data Processing

Cryo-EM data were transferred, patch motion-corrected, patch CTF-estimated, blob picked, and extracted in a 512-pixel box binned to 324 pix. 950,000 putative particles were picked. After three rounds of 2D classification and selection, 635,876 particles were classified in 2D for final 2D averages. rFer24 was easily reconstructed to the Nyquist limit of 2.69A, but the Fabs were bound too flexibly to average into any clear density. All processing was done in cryoSPARC 4.4.0.43 The rFer24-Fab24 conjugate was opened in ChimeraX,46 converted into an mrc, and resampled on a map from the cryo-EM data. This volume was loaded into cryoSPARC to be back-projected in 2D in order to compare with the 2D class averages from the data collected here.

OX40+ Jurkat Reporter Assay

OX40L protein extracellular domain (ECD) fused to the fragment crystallizable (Fc) region of human IgG1 (OX40L-Fc) was obtained from Sino Biological (13127-H01H). Extrinsic cross-linking of OX40L-Fc (OX40L-Fc XL) was accomplished using goat antihuman IgG Fcγ fragment specific antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc., 109-005-098) at a final concentration of 10 μg/mL.

Anti-OX40 IgG1, OX40-Fc XL, and rFer-Fab conjugates were serially diluted 2-fold in AIM-V media (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 12055-091), and 20 μL of each diluted anti-OX40 format was added to a well in a 384-well tissue culture plates (Corning Inc., 3985BC) where OX40-overexpressing Jurkat cells engineered with an NFκB luciferase reporter had been seeded at a density of 80,000 cells/well in 20 μL AIM-V media. The treated cells were incubated for 16–18 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 with 95% relative humidity. Following incubation, 40 μL Bright Glo (Promega, E2610) was added and mixed at room temperature for 10 min. Luminescence was detected on an Infinite M1000 Pro plate reader (Tecan).

Acknowledgments

Yanli Yang, Greg Lazar, Christine Huang, Yavuz Dagdas, Eric Day, Devin Tesar, Sreedhara Alavattam.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.4c00020.

  • Plasmid sequence for liver-derived ferritin LC; full deconvoluted spectrum of rFerm; peptide mapping of isopeptide bond between rFerm and anti-OX40 Fab and accompanying table with detected peptides; and representative micrographs, raw particles, and class averages of rFer24-anti-OX40 Fab24 conjugate in negative stain and cryo-EM (PDF)

Notes

Funding for this project was provided by Genentech Inc.

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Notes

Notes All authors are current or former employees of Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, and are shareholders in Roche. This study was supported by internal Genentech funds, and the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

References

  • Harrison P. M. The Structure and Function of Ferritin. Biochem. Educ. 1986, 14 (4), 154–162. 10.1016/0307-4412(86)90203-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harrison P. M.; Arosio P. The Ferritins: Molecular Properties, Iron Storage Function and Cellular Regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Bioenerg. 1996, 1275 (3), 161–203. 10.1016/0005-2728(96)00022-9. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li J. Y.; Paragas N.; Ned R. M.; Qiu A.; Viltard M.; Leete T.; Drexler I. R.; Chen X.; Sanna-Cherchi S.; Mohammed F.; Williams D.; Lin C. S.; Schmidt-Ott K. M.; Andrews N. C.; Barasch J. Scara5 Is a Ferritin Receptor Mediating Non-Transferrin Iron Delivery. Dev. Cell 2009, 16 (1), 35–46. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.002. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li L.; Fang C. J.; Ryan J. C.; Niemi E. C.; Lebrón J. A.; Björkman P. J.; Arase H.; Torti F. M.; Torti S. V.; Nakamura M. C.; Seaman W. E. Binding and Uptake of H-Ferritin Are Mediated by Human Transferrin Receptor-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107 (8), 3505–3510. 10.1073/pnas.0913192107. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang S.; Zang J.; Chen H.; Li M.; Xu C.; Zhao G. The Size Flexibility of Ferritin Nanocage Opens a New Way to Prepare Nanomaterials. Small 2017, 13 (37), 170104510.1002/smll.201701045. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • He D.; Marles-Wright J. Ferritin Family Proteins and Their Use in Bionanotechnology. New Biotechnol. 2015, 32 (6), 651–657. 10.1016/j.nbt.2014.12.006. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kanekiyo M.; Wei C.-J.; Yassine H. M.; McTamney P. M.; Boyington J. C.; Whittle J. R. R.; Rao S. S.; Kong W.-P.; Wang L.; Nabel G. J. Self-Assembling Influenza Nanoparticle Vaccines Elicit Broadly Neutralizing H1N1 Antibodies. Nature 2013, 499 (7456), 102–106. 10.1038/nature12202. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin C.-Y.; Yang S.-J.; Peng C.-L.; Shieh M.-J. Panitumumab-Conjugated and Platinum-Cored PH-Sensitive Apoferritin Nanocages for Colorectal Cancer-Targeted Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2018, 10 (7), 6096–6106. 10.1021/acsami.7b13431. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wei J.; Li Z.; Yang Y.; Ma G.; Su Z.; Zhang S. An Apoferritin–Hemagglutinin Conjugate Vaccine with Encapsulated Nucleoprotein Antigen Peptide from Influenza Virus Confers Enhanced Cross Protection. Bioconjugate Chem. 2020, 31 (8), 1948–1959. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00308. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hooker J. M.; Datta A.; Botta M.; Raymond K. N.; Francis M. B. Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agents from Viral Capsid Shells: A Comparison of Exterior and Interior Cargo Strategies. Nano Lett. 2007, 7 (8), 2207–2210. 10.1021/nl070512c. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang C.; Zhang C.; Li Z.; Yin S.; Wang Q.; Guo F.; Zhang Y.; Yu R.; Liu Y.; Su Z. Extending Half Life of H-Ferritin Nanoparticle by Fusing Albumin Binding Domain for Doxorubicin Encapsulation. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19 (3), 773–781. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01545. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Su W.; Tan H.; Janowski R.; Zhang W.; Wang P.; Zhang J.; Zhai H.; Li J.; Niessing D.; Sattler M.; Zou P. Ferritin-Displayed GLP-1 with Improved Pharmacological Activities and Pharmacokinetics. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2020, 17 (5), 1663–1673. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00098. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sturgill E. R.; Redmond W. L. TNFR Agonists: A Review of Current Biologics Targeting OX40, 4-1BB, CD27, and GITR. Am. J. Hematol./Oncol. 2017, 13 (11), 4–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Croft M.; Benedict C. A.; Ware C. F. Clinical Targeting of the TNF and TNFR Superfamilies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2013, 12 (2), 147–168. 10.1038/nrd3930. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Faustman D. L.; Davis M. TNF Receptor 2 and Disease: Autoimmunity and Regenerative Medicine. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 478.10.3389/fimmu.2013.00478. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mayes P. A.; Hance K. W.; Hoos A. The Promise and Challenges of Immune Agonist Antibody Development in Cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2018, 17 (7), 509–527. 10.1038/nrd.2018.75. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vanamee É. S.; Faustman D. L. Structural Principles of Tumor Necrosis Factor Superfamily Signaling. Sci. Signaling 2018, 11 (511), eaao491010.1126/scisignal.aao4910. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wajant H. Principles of Antibody-Mediated TNF Receptor Activation. Cell Death Differ. 2015, 22 (11), 1727–1741. 10.1038/cdd.2015.109. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holler N.; Tardivel A.; Kovacsovics-Bankowski M.; Hertig S.; Gaide O.; Martinon F.; Tinel A.; Deperthes D.; Calderara S.; Schulthess T.; Engel J.; Schneider P.; Tschopp J. Two Adjacent Trimeric Fas Ligands Are Required for Fas Signaling and Formation of a Death-Inducing Signaling Complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23 (4), 1428–1440. 10.1128/MCB.23.4.1428-1440.2003. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Furness A. J. S.; Vargas F. A.; Peggs K. S.; Quezada S. A. Impact of Tumour Microenvironment and Fc Receptors on the Activity of Immunomodulatory Antibodies. Trends Immunol. 2014, 35 (7), 290–298. 10.1016/j.it.2014.05.002. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson N. S.; Yang B.; Yang A.; Loeser S.; Marsters S.; Lawrence D.; Li Y.; Pitti R.; Totpal K.; Yee S.; Ross S.; Vernes J.-M.; Lu Y.; Adams C.; Offringa R.; Kelley B.; Hymowitz S.; Daniel D.; Meng G.; Ashkenazi A. An Fcγ Receptor-Dependent Mechanism Drives Antibody-Mediated Target-Receptor Signaling in Cancer Cells. Cancer Cell 2011, 19 (1), 101–113. 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.012. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ashkenazi A. Targeting the Extrinsic Apoptotic Pathway in Cancer: Lessons Learned and Future Directions. J. Clin. Invest. 2015, 125 (2), 487–489. 10.1172/JCI80420. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bremer E. Targeting of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily for Cancer Immunotherapy. ISRN Oncol. 2013, 2013, 37185410.1155/2013/371854. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chester C.; Ambulkar S.; Kohrt H. E. 4-1BB Agonism: Adding the Accelerator to Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2016, 65 (10), 1243–1248. 10.1007/s00262-016-1829-2. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Steeland S.; Vandenbroucke R. E.; Libert C. Nanobodies as Therapeutics: Big Opportunities for Small Antibodies. Drug Discovery Today 2016, 21 (7), 1076–1113. 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.04.003. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cuesta Á. M.; Sainz-Pastor N.; Bonet J.; Oliva B.; Álvarez-Vallina L. Multivalent Antibodies: When Design Surpasses Evolution. Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28 (7), 355–362. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.03.007. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nuñez-Prado N.; Compte M.; Harwood S.; Álvarez-Méndez A.; Lykkemark S.; Sanz L.; Álvarez-Vallina L. The Coming of Age of Engineered Multivalent Antibodies. Drug Discovery Today 2015, 20 (5), 588–594. 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.02.013. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang Y.; Yeh S. H.; Madireddi S.; Matochko W. L.; Gu C.; Sanchez P. P.; Ultsch M.; Boenig G. D. L.; Harris S. F.; Leonard B.; Scales S. J.; Zhu J. W.; Christensen E.; Hang J. Q.; Brezski R. J.; Marsters S.; Ashkenazi A.; Sukumaran S.; Chiu H.; Cubas R.; Kim J. M.; Lazar G. A. Tetravalent Biepitopic Targeting Enables Intrinsic Antibody Agonism of Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Members. mAbs 2019, 11 (6), 996–1011. 10.1080/19420862.2019.1625662. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Darwish M.; Shatz W.; Leonard B.; Loyet K.; Barrett K.; Wong J. L.; Li H.; Abraham R.; Lin M.; Franke Y.; Tam C.; Mortara K.; Zilberleyb I.; Blanchette C. Nanolipoprotein Particles as a Delivery Platform for Fab Based Therapeutics. Bioconjugate Chem. 2020, 31 (8), 1995–2007. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00349. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Florinas S.; Liu M.; Fleming R.; Vlerken-Ysla L. V.; Ayriss J.; Gilbreth R.; Dimasi N.; Gao C.; Wu H.; Xu Z.-Q.; Chen S.; Dirisala A.; Kataoka K.; Cabral H.; Christie R. J. A. Nanoparticle Platform To Evaluate Bioconjugation and Receptor-Mediated Cell Uptake Using Cross-Linked Polyion Complex Micelles Bearing Antibody Fragments. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17 (5), 1818–1833. 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00239. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Greene M. K.; Richards D. A.; Nogueira J. C. F.; Campbell K.; Smyth P.; Fernández M.; Scott C. J.; Chudasama V. Forming Next-Generation Antibody-Nanoparticle Conjugates through the Oriented Installation of Non-Engineered Antibody Fragments. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9 (1), 79–87. 10.1039/C7SC02747H. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Caporale A.; Selis F.; Sandomenico A.; Jotti G. S.; Tonon G.; Ruvo M. The LQSP Tetrapeptide Is a New Highly Efficient Substrate of Microbial Transglutaminase for the Site-specific Derivatization of Peptides and Proteins. Biotechnol. J. 2015, 10 (1), 154–161. 10.1002/biot.201400466. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Steffen W.; Ko F. C.; Patel J.; Lyamichev V.; Albert T. J.; Benz J.; Rudolph M. G.; Bergmann F.; Streidl T.; Kratzsch P.; Boenitz-Dulat M.; Oelschlaegel T.; Schraeml M. Discovery of a Microbial Transglutaminase Enabling Highly Site-Specific Labeling of Proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292 (38), 15622–15635. 10.1074/jbc.M117.797811. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee N. K.; Cho S.; Kim I.-S. Ferritin—a Multifaceted Protein Scaffold for Biotherapeutics. Exp. Mol. Med. 2022, 54 (10), 1652–1657. 10.1038/s12276-022-00859-0. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yoo J. D.; Bae S. M.; Seo J.; Jeon I. S.; Vadevoo S. M. P.; Kim S.-Y.; Kim I.-S.; Lee B.; Kim S. Designed Ferritin Nanocages Displaying Trimeric TRAIL and Tumor-Targeting Peptides Confer Superior Anti-Tumor Efficacy. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10 (1), 1999710.1038/s41598-020-77095-x. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim G. B.; Sung H.-D.; Nam G.-H.; Kim W.; Kim S.; Kang D.; Lee E. J.; Kim I.-S. Design of PD-1-Decorated Nanocages Targeting Tumor-Draining Lymph Node for Promoting T Cell Activation. J. Controlled Release 2021, 333, 328–338. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.03.038. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Geninatti Crich S.; Cadenazzi M.; Lanzardo S.; Conti L.; Ruiu R.; Alberti D.; Cavallo F.; Cutrin J. C.; Aime S. Targeting Ferritin Receptors for the Selective Delivery of Imaging and Therapeutic Agents to Breast Cancer Cells. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (15), 6527–6533. 10.1039/c5nr00352k. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marrink S. J.; Risselada H. J.; Yefimov S.; Tieleman D. P.; de Vries A. H. The MARTINI Force Field: Coarse Grained Model for Biomolecular Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111 (27), 7812–7824. 10.1021/jp071097f. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Izadi S.; Anandakrishnan R.; Onufriev A. V. Implicit Solvent Model for Million-Atom Atomistic Simulations: Insights into the Organization of 30-Nm Chromatin Fiber. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12 (12), 5946–5959. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00712. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eaton D. L.; Wood W. I.; Eaton D.; Hass P. E.; Hollingshead P.; Wion K.; Mather J.; Lawn R. M.; Vehar G. A.; Gorman C. Construction and Characterization of an Active Factor VIII Variant Lacking the Central One-Third of the Molecule. Biochemistry 1986, 25 (26), 8343–8347. 10.1021/bi00374a001. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Paborsky L. R.; Fendly B. M.; Fisher K. L.; Lawn R. M.; Marks B. J.; McCray G.; Tate K. M.; Vehar G. A.; Gorman C. M. Mammalian Cell Transient Expression of Tissue Factor for the Production of Antigen. Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 1990, 3 (6), 547–553. 10.1093/protein/3.6.547. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mastronarde D. N. Automated Electron Microscope Tomography Using Robust Prediction of Specimen Movements. J. Struct. Biol. 2005, 152 (1), 36–51. 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Punjani A.; Rubinstein J. L.; Fleet D. J.; Brubaker M. A. CryoSPARC: Algorithms for Rapid Unsupervised Cryo-EM Structure Determination. Nat. Methods 2017, 14 (3), 290–296. 10.1038/nmeth.4169. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rohou A.; Grigorieff N. CTFFIND4: Fast and Accurate Defocus Estimation from Electron Micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 2015, 192 (2), 216–221. 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meyerson J. R.; Rao P.; Kumar J.; Chittori S.; Banerjee S.; Pierson J.; Mayer M. L.; Subramaniam S. Self-Assembled Monolayers Improve Protein Distribution on Holey Carbon Cryo-EM Supports. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4 (1), 708410.1038/srep07084. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Goddard T. D.; Huang C. C.; Meng E. C.; Pettersen E. F.; Couch G. S.; Morris J. H.; Ferrin T. E. UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting Modern Challenges in Visualization and Analysis. Protein Sci. 2018, 27 (1), 14–25. 10.1002/pro.3235. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.

Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

Genentech