Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


A study was conducted to compare the API Rapid 20E 4-h system (API System S.A., France; commercially available in the U.S.A. under the name DMS Rapid E System; DMS Laboratories, Darts Mill, Flemington, N.J.), the API 20E 18- to 24-h system (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.), and a conventional media system to measure the ability of each to identify members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison tables rather than simple percentage agreement tables were generated to define the particular strengths and weaknesses of each system and to allow the laboratory to best use the data. The Rapid 20E compared quite favorably with conventional media. It yielded correct identifications with 95.9% of the isolates tested (API 20E, 98% identification rate). In 2.5% of the isolates, the Rapid 20E gave only genus identifications, and in 1.4% the organisms did not correspond to any key in the code book and could not be identified by the manufacturer's computer service. The ease of inoculation and the 4-h capability make the Rapid 20E system an extremely attractive development in the field of bacterial identification.

Free full text 


Logo of jcmLink to Publisher's site
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jul; 20(1): 51–54.
PMCID: PMC271244
PMID: 6378967

Evaluation of the four-hour rapid 20E system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Abstract

A study was conducted to compare the API Rapid 20E 4-h system (API System S.A., France; commercially available in the U.S.A. under the name DMS Rapid E System; DMS Laboratories, Darts Mill, Flemington, N.J.), the API 20E 18- to 24-h system (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.), and a conventional media system to measure the ability of each to identify members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison tables rather than simple percentage agreement tables were generated to define the particular strengths and weaknesses of each system and to allow the laboratory to best use the data. The Rapid 20E compared quite favorably with conventional media. It yielded correct identifications with 95.9% of the isolates tested (API 20E, 98% identification rate). In 2.5% of the isolates, the Rapid 20E gave only genus identifications, and in 1.4% the organisms did not correspond to any key in the code book and could not be identified by the manufacturer's computer service. The ease of inoculation and the 4-h capability make the Rapid 20E system an extremely attractive development in the field of bacterial identification.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (562K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Aldridge KE, Gardner BB, Clark SJ, Matsen JM. Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Jun;7(6):507–513. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Durosoir JL. ABAC identibiogramme: prototype of an automated system for identification of enterobacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Feb;2(1):26–31. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Edberg SC, Atkinson B, Chambers C, Moore MH, Palumbo L, Zorzon CF, Singer JM. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):161–167. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Izard D, Gavini F, Ochin D, Enayeh E, Leclerc H. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1980 Dec;28(10):681–684. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Izard D, Savage C, Enayeh E, Leclerc H, Troonen H. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1982 May;252(1):26–34. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • McCracken AW, Martin WJ, McCarthy LR, Schwab DA, Cooper BH, Helgeson NG, Prowant S, Robson J. Evaluation of the MS-2 system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Nov;12(5):684–689. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Article citations


Go to all (14) article citations