Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


We present a new parameterization of physiological epistasis that allows the measurement of epistasis separate from its effects on the interaction (epistatic) genetic variance component. Epistasis is the deviation of two-locus genotypic values from the sum of the contributing single-locus genotypic values. This parameterization leads to statistical tests for epistasis given estimates of two-locus genotypic values such as can be obtained from quantitative trait locus studies. The contributions of epistasis to the additive, dominance and interaction genetic variances are specified. Epistasis can make substantial contributions to each of these variance components. This parameterization of epistasis allows general consideration of the role of epistasis in evolution by defining its contribution to the additive genetic variance.

Free full text 


Logo of geneticsLink to Publisher's site
Genetics. 1995 Mar; 139(3): 1455–1461.
PMCID: PMC1206471
PMID: 7768453

Epistasis and Its Contribution to Genetic Variance Components

Abstract

We present a new parameterization of physiological epistasis that allows the measurement of epistasis separate from its effects on the interaction (epistatic) genetic variance component. Epistasis is the deviation of two-locus genotypic values from the sum of the contributing single-locus genotypic values. This parameterization leads to statistical tests for epistasis given estimates of two-locus genotypic values such as can be obtained from quantitative trait locus studies. The contributions of epistasis to the additive, dominance and interaction genetic variances are specified. Epistasis can make substantial contributions to each of these variance components. This parameterization of epistasis allows general consideration of the role of epistasis in evolution by defining its contribution to the additive genetic variance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (675K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Andersson L, Haley CS, Ellegren H, Knott SA, Johansson M, Andersson K, Andersson-Eklund L, Edfors-Lilja I, Fredholm M, Hansson I, et al. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs. Science. 1994 Mar 25;263(5154):1771–1774. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Barker JS. Inter-locus interactions: a review of experimental evidence. Theor Popul Biol. 1979 Dec;16(3):323–346. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Bryant EH, McCommas SA, Combs LM. The Effect of an Experimental Bottleneck upon Quantitative Genetic Variation in the Housefly. Genetics. 1986 Dec;114(4):1191–1211. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Cockerham CC. An Extension of the Concept of Partitioning Hereditary Variance for Analysis of Covariances among Relatives When Epistasis Is Present. Genetics. 1954 Nov;39(6):859–882. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crow JF. Population genetics history: a personal view. Annu Rev Genet. 1987;21:1–22. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Doebley J, Stec A. Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics. 1991 Sep;129(1):285–295. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hastings A. Multilocus population genetics with weak epistasis. I. Equilibrium properties of two-locus two-allele models. Genetics. 1985 Apr;109(4):799–812. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Karlin S. General two-locus selection models: some objectives, results and interpretations. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Jun;7(3):364–398. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Karlin S, Feldman MW. Linkage and selection: two locus symmetric viability model. Theor Popul Biol. 1970 May;1(1):39–71. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Routman E, Cheverud JM. Individual genes underlying quantitative traits: molecular and analytical methods. EXS. 1994;69:593–606. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Simmons MJ, Crow JF. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:49–78. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Tachida H, Cockerham CC. A building block model for quantitative genetics. Genetics. 1989 Apr;121(4):839–844. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Templeton AR. The Unit of Selection in DROSOPHILA MERCATORUM. II. Genetic Revolution and the Origin of Coadapted Genomes in Parthenogenetic Strains. Genetics. 1979 Aug;92(4):1265–1282. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Templeton AR. The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Genetics. 1980 Apr;94(4):1011–1038. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/102417112
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/102417112

Article citations


Go to all (261) article citations

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.