Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


To improve secondary structure predictions in protein sequences, the information residing in multiple sequence alignments of substituted but structurally related proteins is exploited. A database comprised of 70 protein families and a total of 2,500 sequences, some of which were aligned by tertiary structural superpositions, was used to calculate residue exchange weight matrices within alpha-helical, beta-strand, and coil substructures, respectively. Secondary structure predictions were made based on the observed residue substitutions in local regions of the multiple alignments and the largest possible associated exchange weights in each of the three matrix types. Comparison of the observed and predicted secondary structure on a per-residue basis yielded a mean accuracy of 72.2%. Individual alpha-helix, beta-strand, and coil states were respectively predicted at 66.7, and 75.8% correctness, representing a well-balanced three-state prediction. The accuracy level, verified by cross-validation through jack-knife tests on all protein families, dropped, on average, to only 70.9%, indicating the rigor of the prediction procedure. On the basis of robustness, conceptual clarity, accuracy, and executable efficiency, the method has considerable advantage, especially with its sole reliance on amino acid substitutions within structurally related proteins.

Free full text 


Logo of prosciprotein sciencecshl presssubscriptionsetoc alertsthe protein societyjournal home
Protein Sci. 1995 Dec; 4(12): 2517–2525.
PMCID: PMC2143048
PMID: 8580842

A simple and fast approach to prediction of protein secondary structure from multiply aligned sequences with accuracy above 70%.

Abstract

To improve secondary structure predictions in protein sequences, the information residing in multiple sequence alignments of substituted but structurally related proteins is exploited. A database comprised of 70 protein families and a total of 2,500 sequences, some of which were aligned by tertiary structural superpositions, was used to calculate residue exchange weight matrices within alpha-helical, beta-strand, and coil substructures, respectively. Secondary structure predictions were made based on the observed residue substitutions in local regions of the multiple alignments and the largest possible associated exchange weights in each of the three matrix types. Comparison of the observed and predicted secondary structure on a per-residue basis yielded a mean accuracy of 72.2%. Individual alpha-helix, beta-strand, and coil states were respectively predicted at 66.7, and 75.8% correctness, representing a well-balanced three-state prediction. The accuracy level, verified by cross-validation through jack-knife tests on all protein families, dropped, on average, to only 70.9%, indicating the rigor of the prediction procedure. On the basis of robustness, conceptual clarity, accuracy, and executable efficiency, the method has considerable advantage, especially with its sole reliance on amino acid substitutions within structurally related proteins.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (906K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Barton GJ, Newman RH, Freemont PS, Crumpton MJ. Amino acid sequence analysis of the annexin super-gene family of proteins. Eur J Biochem. 1991 Jun 15;198(3):749–760. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Bazan JF. Structural design and molecular evolution of a cytokine receptor superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Sep;87(18):6934–6938. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Benner SA, Gerloff D. Patterns of divergence in homologous proteins as indicators of secondary and tertiary structure: a prediction of the structure of the catalytic domain of protein kinases. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1991;31:121–181. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Bowie JU, Lüthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 1991 Jul 12;253(5016):164–170. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Chou PY, Fasman GD. Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, beta-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. Biochemistry. 1974 Jan 15;13(2):211–222. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Colloc'h N, Etchebest C, Thoreau E, Henrissat B, Mornon JP. Comparison of three algorithms for the assignment of secondary structure in proteins: the advantages of a consensus assignment. Protein Eng. 1993 Jun;6(4):377–382. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crawford IP, Niermann T, Kirschner K. Prediction of secondary structure by evolutionary comparison: application to the alpha subunit of tryptophan synthase. Proteins. 1987;2(2):118–129. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Devereux J, Haeberli P, Smithies O. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):387–395. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Donnelly D, Overington JP, Blundell TL. The prediction and orientation of alpha-helices from sequence alignments: the combined use of environment-dependent substitution tables, Fourier transform methods and helix capping rules. Protein Eng. 1994 May;7(5):645–653. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Garnier J, Levin JM. The protein structure code: what is its present status? Comput Appl Biosci. 1991 Apr;7(2):133–142. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Garnier J, Osguthorpe DJ, Robson B. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1978 Mar 25;120(1):97–120. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Gibrat JF, Garnier J, Robson B. Further developments of protein secondary structure prediction using information theory. New parameters and consideration of residue pairs. J Mol Biol. 1987 Dec 5;198(3):425–443. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hirst JD, Sternberg MJ. Prediction of structural and functional features of protein and nucleic acid sequences by artificial neural networks. Biochemistry. 1992 Aug 18;31(32):7211–7218. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Holley LH, Karplus M. Protein secondary structure prediction with a neural network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jan;86(1):152–156. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kneller DG, Cohen FE, Langridge R. Improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by an enhanced neural network. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jul 5;214(1):171–182. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Levin JM, Pascarella S, Argos P, Garnier J. Quantification of secondary structure prediction improvement using multiple alignments. Protein Eng. 1993 Nov;6(8):849–854. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lim VI. Structural principles of the globular organization of protein chains. A stereochemical theory of globular protein secondary structure. J Mol Biol. 1974 Oct 5;88(4):857–872. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lüthy R, McLachlan AD, Eisenberg D. Secondary structure-based profiles: use of structure-conserving scoring tables in searching protein sequence databases for structural similarities. Proteins. 1991;10(3):229–239. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Muggleton S, King RD, Sternberg MJ. Protein secondary structure prediction using logic-based machine learning. Protein Eng. 1992 Oct;5(7):647–657. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Overington J, Donnelly D, Johnson MS, Sali A, Blundell TL. Environment-specific amino acid substitution tables: tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds. Protein Sci. 1992 Feb;1(2):216–226. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Pascarella S, Argos P. A data bank merging related protein structures and sequences. Protein Eng. 1992 Mar;5(2):121–137. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Qian N, Sejnowski TJ. Predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins using neural network models. J Mol Biol. 1988 Aug 20;202(4):865–884. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rost B, Sander C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jul 20;232(2):584–599. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Russell RB, Barton GJ. The limits of protein secondary structure prediction accuracy from multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol. 1993 Dec 20;234(4):951–957. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Russell RB, Breed J, Barton GJ. Conservation analysis and structure prediction of the SH2 family of phosphotyrosine binding domains. FEBS Lett. 1992 Jun 8;304(1):15–20. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Salamov AA, Solovyev VV. Prediction of protein secondary structure by combining nearest-neighbor algorithms and multiple sequence alignments. J Mol Biol. 1995 Mar 17;247(1):11–15. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang X, Mesirov JP, Waltz DL. Hybrid system for protein secondary structure prediction. J Mol Biol. 1992 Jun 20;225(4):1049–1063. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Zvelebil MJ, Barton GJ, Taylor WR, Sternberg MJ. Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jun 20;195(4):957–961. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Article citations


Go to all (37) article citations