Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Ruxolitinib is the first approved JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, and is known to interfere with the JAK / STAT signaling pathway, one of the critical cellular signaling pathways involved in the inflammatory response. This review presents an overview of SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic, and then focuses on the potential efficacy of ruxolitinib in this infection. The potential targets of ruxolitinib were determined by using genetic alterations that have been reported in COVID-19 patients. The potential effectiveness of ruxolitinib is suggested by evaluating the interactions of these potential targets with ruxolitinib or JAK/STAT pathway.

Free full text 


Logo of pheelsevierLink to Publisher's site
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020 Aug; 54: 51–61.
Published online 2020 Jun 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.06.013
PMCID: PMC7305753
PMID: 32636055

The potential of JAK/STAT pathway inhibition by ruxolitinib in the treatment of COVID-19

Graphical abstract

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, JAK/STAT pathway, Ruxolitinib, Cytokine storm

Abstract

Ruxolitinib is the first approved JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, and is known to interfere with the JAK / STAT signaling pathway, one of the critical cellular signaling pathways involved in the inflammatory response. This review presents an overview of SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic, and then focuses on the potential efficacy of ruxolitinib in this infection. The potential targets of ruxolitinib were determined by using genetic alterations that have been reported in COVID-19 patients. The potential effectiveness of ruxolitinib is suggested by evaluating the interactions of these potential targets with ruxolitinib or JAK/STAT pathway.

1. Introduction

In the final days of 2019, a pneumonia of unknown etiology with fever, breathing difficulties, and invasive lung lesions was reported in Wuhan China by the WHO. On January 7, 2020, Chinese scientists identified the etiologic agent as a new type of coronavirus, with the genome sequence available five days later [1]. WHO changed the status of the disease to a pandemic on March 11, 2020, because of the rapid increase in cases and worldwide spread [1]. As of June 17, 2020, the total number of Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) cases worldwide was approximately 8 million and the total number of deaths was approximately 450,000, a death total ratio of 5.48 percent [2]. At present, there is no protective vaccine or approved treatments available.

2. Overview of the SARS-CoV-2

The virus, which is the cause of the COVID-19 was named as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-related Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) by Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (Fig. 1 a). SARS-CoV-2 is a betacoronavirus, in the Coronaviridae family along with two other species that infect humans, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV [3].

Fig. 1

Overview of the SARS-CoV-2 a. Taxonomy of the virus; b. Viral transcriptome; c. Pathophysiology.

The genomic structure of the virus is a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA which is approximately 30 kb (29,903 nucleotides). The viral RNA is packaged by nucleocapsid proteins and this structure is surrounded by a bilayer lipid corona structure which includes membrane, envelope, and spike proteins (Fig. 1b). The transcriptome contains the open reading frame (ORF) 1ab, S, ORF3a, E, M, ORF6, ORF7a, ORF7b, ORF8, N, and ORF10 genes, respectively. ORF1ab is cleavaged to nonstructural proteins (nsp). Among them, nsp12 has RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity which performs replication and transcription of the viral genome using it as a template. The functions of other ORFs, which encode accessory proteins, are not yet clearly described [4]. The S gene encodes the Spike glycoprotein that binds to the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor to infect the host cells [5]. While Envelope and Membrane proteins encoded by E and M genes, associate with the bilayer lipid envelope structure on the outer surface of the virus, N codes the Nucleocapsid protein that directly interacts with the viral genome [6].

The S protein of virion binds to the ACE2 receptor of the cell that will be infected by the virus (Fig. 1c). In the process following the binding, it is suggested that proteases especially TMPRSS2, on the surface of the host cell can strengthen binding and trigger receptor-mediated endocytosis by causing conformational changes in the S glycoprotein [5]. The early endosome carrying the virion matures towards the late endosome during vesicular traffic process and the gradual increase in the endosomal lumen acidity causes the release of the viral genome to the cytoplasm [7]. Firstly, ORF1ab is translated using the viral RNA, and its cleavage forms the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase which is involved in both replication and transcription of structural proteins. Using these transcripts, cytoplasmic ribosomes translate the nucleocapsid protein, and ER-bound ribosomes translate the spike, envelope, and membrane proteins into the ER lumen. Nucleocapsid packed viral RNA is encapsulated within the vesicle which carries spike, envelope, and membrane proteins on its membrane in the Endoplasmic Reticulum Golgi Intermediate Compartment (ERGIC). Finally, a complete virion is released to the extracellular region by exocytosis [8].

3. Overview of the COVID-19

3.1. Symptoms

SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted from human to human with droplets and from the mucosal surfaces of the nose, mouth, and eyes [9]. It is thought that the majority of the SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals are asymptomatic depending on their general health conditions and age. Fever, dry cough, fatigue or weakness, and dyspnea are the most common (>50%); myalgia, chest oppression or pain, diarrhea, loss of or poor appetite, shortness of breath, expectoration, anorexia are common (<50% and >10%); headache, chest pain, sore throat, vomiting, loss of smell and taste are the less common (<10%) symptoms of the diagnosed cases [[10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]].

3.2. Diagnosis

In addition to general symptoms and laboratory findings, chest computed tomography (CT), rapid antibody-based methods, and molecular tests including Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase–PCR are utilized for diagnosis of COVID-19 [10]. SARS-CoV-2 was isolated from different clinical samples including upper and lower respiratory tract passages, blood, and stool. However the infectious nature of the live virus is not exactly defined, with the exception of the respiratory tract samples [21]. Based on Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase–PCR test results, the infectivity rate decreases in virus from bronchoalveolar lavage, sputum, throat, nasal and pharyngeal swabs, respectively [22]. Similarly, the infectivity rate appears to be higher in the early and progressive stages of the disease, compared to the recovery stage. The high viral load and infectious properties of the respiratory samples are thus suggestive evidence of respiratory transmission [23].

3.3. Risk factors

Advanced age (≥ 65 years) is defined as the most common risk factor. Comorbidities - hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, malignancies, chronic kidney or hepatic diseases, asthma, or infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, and hepatitis - have been identified as other risk groups [10,11,13,17,19,24]. Although smoking is the main risk factor for various diseases especially lung cancer, it is not classified as a risk factor of COVID-19 as yet [25]. Various genetic factors may also affect the prognosis of COVID-19; for example, the phenotypes of HLA-B *46:01 and HLA-B*15:03 affect the severity of infection by causing low and high binding affinity of SARS-CoV-2 to cells, respectively [26].

3.4. Complications

Complications triggered by COVID-19 are the main factors affecting disease severity and death. The most common complication of the COVID-19 is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). It is characterized by the appearance of ground-glass opacities in the lungs and results in serious respiratory failure and secondary complications, including multiple organ failure related to insufficient oxygenation levels [20,24,27]. Cytokine release syndrome or cytokine storm (See “4- Cytokine storm and COVID-19″ section), hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and septic shock are frequently seen as complications from hyperactivation of the immune system [[28], [29], [30], [31], [32]]. Development of the autoimmune diseases including neurodegenerative disorders like Guillain Barre Syndrome, hematologic disorders like autoimmune hemolytic anemia is reported during COVID-19 treatment [33,34]. Acute cardiac, kidney, and liver injury are reported as common complications [20,24,27]. Although meningitis and encephalitis are also reported as less common complications of COVID-19, other bacterial or viral co-infections are quite frequent and they may result in deaths [18,35].

3.5. Current therapies

No treatment or drug has yet been approved, although different therapeutic approaches are currently being tested against the symptoms of COVID-19. Current treatment applications are separated into two subgroups: the first group of the treatment strategies includes antiviral drugs and immune-based therapies to overcome viral infection; the second group comprises antithrombotics, ventilation or oxygen therapies, used for secondary complications.

Remdesivir (GS-5734, Gilead Sciences) is an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor, used against RNA viruses such as Ebolaviruses, although it has not yet been approved for any indication [36,37]. Chloroquine (or hydroxychloroquine) is an approved antimalarial drug that increases the pH of lysosomes and inhibits autophagy by suppressing lysosome-autophagosome fusion [38]. This autophagy inhibitor is a part of the current COVID-19 treatment protocol because it inhibits the endocytic pathway which allows virus entry into the cell and activation after binding to the ACE2 receptor [39]. Nevertheless, current indicated that chloroquine has no beneficial value in seriously ill patinets. HIV protease inhibitors have been approved for use in treatment of HIV that function to inhibit proteolysis of viral proteins necessary to complete the HIV life cycle [40]. It is predicted that protease inhibition performed with agents such as Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra, Abbott Laboratories) may also be effective against SARS-CoV-2 [41].

The use of plasma (known as convalescent plasma therapy) or immune globulins from recovered individuals is being tested in clinical trials to help activate the immune system against SARS-CoV-2 in patients. Also, interferons (interferon alfa and interferon beta) are being tested for the same purpose [42]. Numerous clinical studies aimed to induce adaptive immunity are currently underway by different research teams [43,44].

It has been reported that the infection-related increase of coagulation parameters especially the D-dimer (normal range <0.5 μg/ml) is directly proportional to the severity of the disease. Coagulation abnormalities cause disseminated intravascular coagulation and triggers venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism which are among the main causes of COVID-19 related death. Antithrombotic and anticoagulant drugs including heparin, warfarin, direct-acting oral anticoagulants are used to protect against the development of coagulation and thromboembolism complications during the treatment process [45].

3.6. Genetic alterations in COVID-19

Various genetic alterations have been reported that could potentially be used as therapeutic targets during COVID-19 infection (Fig. 2 ). These variations especially include inflammation and immune response regulation [10,11,[13], [14], [15], [16], [17],19,24,27,29,31,32,[46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53]]. Furthermore, increased expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 may contribute to complications in the heart, lungs, and different organs of the nervous system [47,54].

Fig. 2

Genetic alterations in different tissues and blood of COVID-19 patients compared to control cells.

4. Cytokine storm and COVID-19

As a consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, a cytokine storm syndrome is triggered by dysregulated immune responses; the cytokine storm is characterized by a high inflammatory response, including elevated levels of cytokines and immune cells that infiltrate and destroy organs and cause lung lesions, respiratory dysfunction, multiple organ damage, and death [28]. Cytokines are a group of immunoregulatory cell-cell communication molecules including different subtypes named chemokine (chemotaxis cytokine), interleukin (leukocyte related cytokine), lymphokine (lymphocytes-related cytokine), monokine (monocytes-related cytokine) and interferons. Although originally thought to be secreted by specific immune cells, it is now recognized that nonimmune cells, fibroblasts or endothelial cellsrespond to inflammation or injury, as well as monocytes, macrophages, B- and T-lymphocytes. These cytokines are both cause and effect of the immune response and include both pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules [55].

4.1. The JAK/ STAT pathway

Cytokines regulate different cellular and immune processes and their activation is controlled by the JAK/STAT signalling pathway [56]. The Janus kinases (JAKs) and the signal transducers and activators of transcriptions (STATs) form one of the main regulatory cell signaling pathways (Fig. 3 ). The JAK non-receptor tyrosine kinase family includes Jak1, Jak2, Jak3, and Tyrosine kinase 2 (Tyk2) proteins. Their unique structure consists of seven JAK homology domains (JH1-7); at the carboxy-terminal, are two kinase domains (JH1 and JH2). This family is named for the mythological Janus god because of the two headed tandem kinase domains. The JH1 domain is a catalytic component and a second kinase domain is a pseudo-kinase JH2 that has an autoregulatory suppressor function. JH3 is a Src homology (SH2) domain and the activated SH2 generates a binding site for STAT transcription factors. At the amino terminal end is a receptor-interacting FERM domain comprising JH4-7 (Band 4.1, ezrin, radixin, moesin) [57]. The JAK non-receptor tyrosine kinases receive numerous different extracellular signals (growth factor, cytokine, and hormone) from host receptors and transfer these responses to the nucleus via the intracellular STATs. When extracellular signals are received by the specific JAK-associated receptor, a conformational change occurs that causes autophosphorylation on the tyrosines of the JAKs, and subsequent dimerization of the STATs. Dimerized STATs are directed into the nucleus and trigger transcription of the immune regulatory, apoptotic, cell cycle, and differentiation related genes. The STAT protein family includes STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5a, STAT5b, and STAT6, and all contain an N-terminal, coiled-coil domain involved in protein-protein interactions, DNA-binding domain for sequence-specific DNA binding andnuclear localization, a linker region, an SH2 domain involved in dimerization and protein association, and a transactivation domain (TAD) that carries conserved tyrosine residues that are phosphorylation sites for host kinases [58]. Depending on the physiological signal, the JAK/STAT pathway regulates critical cellular homeostasis processes including immune response, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis[59].

Fig. 3

The schematic structures of the JAK and STAT proteins and overview of the JAK/STAT pathway.

The IL6/JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway represents a specific branch of the JAK/STAT pathway that includes IL6, an essential pleiotropic cytokine produced by B cells T cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages to generate an immune response or inflammation. Binding of IL6 to its specific receptor (IL6 receptor-subunit alpha IL6R) triggers a heterohexameric complex with IL6 receptor subunit-β (gp130, IL6ST) and activates the IL6/JAK/STAT3 pathway, that includes activation of inflammation-related downstream targets [58].

IL6 is is one of the pivotal inflammatory cytokines upregulated in influenza, vaccinia, hepatitis B and C, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, and human immunodeficiency virus infections in humans [60]. In the context of COVID-19 cytokine storm, IL6 is likewise one of the most highly expressed cytokines; elevated serum levels of IL6 are considered one of the main indicators of poor prognosis in SARS-CoV-2 infection. The local inflammatory response, generated in part through IL6, also spreads throughout the body and contributes to cytokine release and acute respiratory distress syndromes, as well as organ damage. Different therapeutic strategies to overcome hyper-inflammation include the use of JAK/STAT pathway inhibitors and particularly anti-IL6 inhibitors [28].

5. Overview of the ruxolitinib and effect mechanisms

The first approved JAK inhibitor was ruxolitinib, followed by other JAK inhibitors including baricitinib, upadacitinib, tofacitinib, peficitinib, and fedratinib [[61], [62], [63]] that are under clinical investigation for the treatment of the cytokine storm. Among these, baricitinib (LY3009104, INCB028050, Olumiant, Eli Lilly) was the second JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, approved in 2018 for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In addition to its anti-inflammatory effects, baricitinib also inhibits virus endocytosis, indicating a dual specificity inhibitor [64]. And although clinical studies are underway, there is a caveat - baricitinib may increase patient vulnerability to co-infection, virus reactivation, lymphocytopenia, and neutropenia, thus indicating that it may not be an ideal treatment option [65]. A similar situation is encountered with interleukin inhibitors. Tocilizumab, an approved IL6 receptor antagonist, has been shown to reduce cytokine release syndrome symptoms in severe patients COVID-19 [66], but may also contribute to an increased risk of death by increasing immunosuppression in severely ill patients [30].

5.1. Ruxolitinib

Ruxolitinib (INCB018424; Jakavi; Incyte Corporation) is a potent JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor that blocks JAK kinase activity and prevents STAT activation and nuclear translocation. Ruxolitinib was approved by the FDA in November 2011, December 2014, and May 2019 for the treatments of Myelofibrosis, Polycythemia Vera, and Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease, respectively to reduce the high level of cytokine release associated with these disorders. Therefore, ruxolitinib has begun to take its placein the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and lupus erythematosus, as well as other allergic and inflammatory diseases [67]. Ruxolitinib also inhibits IL6/JAK/STAT3 pathway, thus reducing circulating IL6 levels [68,69].

5.2. Ruxolitinib and viral infections

The potential of ruxolitinib in the treatment of different inflammatory conditions is also being investigated.

5.2.1. Immunosuppression

Ruxolitinib is used in both acute and chronic graft versus host disease from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. [70]. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, a rare secondary disease triggered by viral infection or autoimmune disease, in which a hyper-activated immune response may causesevere complications; ruxolitinib has been shown to suppress cytokine levels and the JAK/STAT pathway in Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis [71].

5.2.2. Antiviral efficacy

The anti-viral properties of ruxolitinib may have activity against Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and EBV infections. Ruxolitinib has been shown to inhibit HIV-1 replication in lymphocytes and macrophages and to suppress HIV-1 reactivation [72, as well as to inhibit production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL1β, IL2, IL5, IL6, IL7, IL13, IL15, and IFNG [[73], [74], [75]]. Similarly, the anti-viral potential of ruxolitinib is also indicated in EBV infection where ruxolitinib inhibits EBV-infected PBMC proliferation and reduces elevated inflammatory cytokines by inhibition of STAT3 [76,77].

5.2.3. Opportunistic infections

Because the JAK/STAT pathway is a primary signal pathway, suppression of this pathway can also result in the emergence of opportunistic infections. The development of Polyomavirus (JC-Virus and BK-Virus) related fatal encephalopathy and meningitis has been reported during ruxolitinib treatment [78,79]. Because the JAK/STAT pathway inhibits Zika Virus (ZIKV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), members of the Flaviviridae family, it is suggested that ruxolitinib may actually increase viral replication [80,81]. Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) reactivation has also been reported due to ruxolitinib treatment [82]. Infections of different Herpesvirus family members which include Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV), EBV, and Cytomegalovirus (CMV), have also been reported. Development of gastric ulcer and meningoencephalitis due to EBV and VZV infections has been reported in patients with myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera treated with ruxolitinib, respectively [83,84]. Ruxolitinib has also been associated with reactivation of CMV, VZV, and EBV during myelofibrosis, graft versus host disease, and myelodysplastic syndrome treatments [[85], [86], [87], [88]]. Reactivation causes secondary diseases that include lymphoproliferative disorders [89].

6. Potential interactions between ruxolitinib and COVID-19

Since ruxolitinib is well-toleratedand used in the elderly population at present, it is a powerful candidate to overcome the hyperimmune syndrome that arises in COVID-19 patients [68]. A number of clinical trials assessing the efficacy of ruxolitinib in COVID-19 related symptoms are ongoing (Table 1 ).

Table 1

Clinical trials including ruxolitinib.

Trial IDNameSponsorDoseDesignPatients & Medical conditionTime frameStatus
EUCTR2020-001662-11-DERUXCOVIDNovartis Pharma AGOnce daily 5 mg
  • • Phase 3
  • • Randomized
  • • Double-blind
  • • Placebo-controlled
  • • 64 patient
  • • COVID-19 associated cytokine storm
  • • 29 days
  • • Mortality
R
EUCTR2020-001459-42-DKRuxolitinib Treatment in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Infection. A Danish Safety and Efficacy Study.Zealand University Hospital-DenmarkOnce daily 10 to 40 mg
  • • Phase 2
  • • Non-randomized
  • • Open label
  • • 40 patients
  • • COVID-19 Pneumonia
  • • 30 days
  • • Mortality
O
ChiCTR2000029580Severe novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) patients treated with ruxolitinib in combination with mesenchymal stem cells: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled clinical trialDepartment of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology- China
  • • Randomized
  • • Single-blind
  • • 35 patients
  • • COVID-19 diagnosed
  • • Positive serum antibodies (IgM or IgG)
  • • 7 days
R
2020-001777-71Ruxolitinib therapy to avoid Ventilation and improve outcome for deteriorating COVID-19 patients – RAVENGuy’s and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust- UK
Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd- free of charge drug supply
  • • Phase 4
  • • Non-randomized
  • • Open label
  • • 59 patients
  • • Proven COVID-19
  • • 28 days
O
NCT04348071Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib for COVID-19University of Colorado, Denver- USATwice daily 10 mg
  • • Phase 2
  • • Phase 3
  • • Single arm
  • • Open label
  • • 80 patients
  • • 29 days
  • • Mortality
NYR
NCT04354714Ruxolitinib to Combat COVID-19Washington University School of Medicine- USA
Collobrator Incyte Corporation
Twice daily 5 mg and 10 mg
  • • Phase 2
  • • Open label
  • • 25 patients
  • • Positive test for SARS-CoV-2 RNA
  • • Immune-hyperactivation
  • • 29 days
  • • Mortality
W
NCT04377620Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib in Participants With COVID-19-Associated ARDS Who Require Mechanical Ventilation (RUXCOVID-DEVENT)Incyte CorporationTwice daily 5 mg and 15 mg
  • • Phase 3
  • • Randomized
  • • Double-blind
  • • Placebo-controlled
  • • 500 patients
  • • SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed
  • • 29 days
  • • Mortality
R
NCT04366232Efficacy of Intravenous Anakinra and Ruxolitinib During COVID-19 Inflammation (JAKINCOV)Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer- FranceTwice daily 5 mg
  • • Phase 2
  • • Randomize
  • • Controlled
  • • 50 patients
  • • Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR
  • • 29 days
  • • Mortality
NYR
NCT04338958Ruxolitinib in Covid-19 Patients With Defined HyperinFlammation (RuxCoFlam)University of Jena- GermanyTwice daily 10 mg or 20 mg
  • • Phase 2
  • • Single arm
  • • Non-randomized
  • • 200 patients
  • • COVID-19 stage II and stage III
  • • Hyper-inflammation
  • • 7 days
R
NCT04334044Treatment of SARS caused by COVID-19 with RuxolitinibGrupo Cooperativo de Hemopatías Malignas -MexicoTwice daily 5 mg
  • • Phase 1
  • • Phase 2
  • • 20 patients
  • • Diagnosed COVID-19
  • • 7 days
R
NCT04331665Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib to Treat COVID-19 PneumoniaUniversity Health Network, Toronto- USATwice daily 10 mg (for 14 days) 5 mg, (for 2 days) Once daily 5 mg (for 1 day)
  • • Single arm
  • • Open label
  • • 64 patients
  • • COVID-19 infection diagnosed by nasopharyngeal sample
  • • 9 month
NYR
NCT04374149Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Alone or in Combination With Ruxolitinib in COVID-19 Associated CRSPrisma Health-UpstatePlasma excahange and Once daily 5 mg (for14 days)
  • • Phase 2
  • • Non-randomized
  • • Open label
  • • 20 patients
  • • Positive for COVID-19 by PCR
  • • 14 day
NYR
NCT04359290Ruxolitinib for Treatment of Covid-19 Induced Lung Injury ARDS (RuXoCoil)Philipps University Marburg Medical Center- GermanyTwice daily 10 mg to 15 mg
  • • Phase 2
  • • Open label
  • • 15 patients
  • • Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection
  • • Cytokine release syndrome (CRS)
  • • Increased activation of the JAK/STAT pathway
  • • 28 days
NYR
NCT04355793Expanded Access Program of Ruxolitinib for the Emergency Treatment of Cytokine Storm From COVID-19 InfectionIncyte CorporationTwice daily 5 mg starting dose
  • • Open label
  • • COVID-19 related cytokine storm
A
NCT04361903COVID-19: Ruxolitinib for the Treatment of cytokinE Storm resPiratory dIstREss Syndrome. RESPIRE StudyAzienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest- ItalyTwice daily at least 20 mg (for the first 48 hours)
  • • Observational
  • • Retrospective
  • • Monocentric
  • • Non-profit
  • • 13 patients
  • • COVID-19 diagnosed
  • • 15 days
NYR
NCT04414098Ruxolitinib in the Treatment of Covid-19Marcelo Iastrebner- Argentina
Collaborator: Novartis
Twice daily 5 mg
  • • Phase 2
  • • Experimental
  • • Open label
  • • Prospective
  • • 100 patients
  • • SARS-Cov2 infection confirmed by PCR test
  • • 14 days
NYR
NCT04337359Ruxolitinib Managed Access Program (MAP) for Patients Diagnosed With Severe/Very Severe COVID-19 IllnessNovartis PharmaceuticalsOnce daily 5 mgA
NCT04424056An Open Randomized Therapeutic Trial Using ANAKINRA, TOCILIZUMAB Alone or in Association With RUXOLITINIB in Severe Stage 2b and 3 of COVID19-associated Disease (INFLAMMACOV)Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille- FranceDifferent combinations with anakinra, tocilizumab
  • • Phase 3
  • • Randomized
  • • Open label
  • • 216 patients
  • • Proven COVID-19
  • • 28 days
NYR
NCT04348695Study of Ruxolitinib Plus Simvastatin in the Prevention and Treatment of Respiratory Failure of COVID-19. (Ruxo-Sim-20)Hospital Universitario Madrid Sanchinarro-Madrid- SpainTwice daily 5 mg (7 days) Twice daily 10 mg (following 7 days) combination with simvastatin
  • • Phase 2
  • • Randomized
  • • Open label
  • • 94 patients
  • • SARS-Cov2 infection confirmed by PCR test
  • • 14 days
R
*Collaborator: Apices Soluciones S.L.
NCT04403243COLchicine Versus Ruxolitinib and Secukinumab In Open Prospective Randomized Trial (COLORIT)Lomonosov Moscow State University Medical Research and Educational Center- RussiaTwice daily 5 mg
  • • Phase 2
  • • Randomized
  • • Open label
  • • 70 patients
  • • 45 days
R

A available; NYR not yet recruiting; O ongoing; R recruiting; W withdrawn.

To determine the potential molecular efficacy of ruxolitinibon genetic alterations,molecular pathways that include altered genes were determined by the KEGG Pathway Database and the STRING Database Version 11 (Fig. 4 ). Ruxolitinib reduced the expression of inflammatory biomarkers at both the gene and protein levels in different cells (Table 2 ).

Fig. 4

Potential interactions between ruxolitinib and COVID-19 related genetic alterations.

Table 2

Genetic alterations are directly targeted by ruxolitinib in COVID-19.

GenesRegulation in COVID-19ReferenceEffects of ruxolitinibReference
CBLDownregulated after treatment in severe cases (PBMC)[14]Inhibits CBL mutant Pluripotent Stem Cells[90]
CXCL10Upregulated in COVID-19 patients PBMC (compared to normal PBMC) and elevated blood level in severe patients[32,49,52]Downregulates the expression level in macrophages[91]
IL10Upregulated in COVID-19 patients PBMC (compared to normal PBMC)and elevated blood level in severe patients[10,11,49,50,53,14,15,16,18,19,24,27,31]Decreases secretion in macrophages[92]
IL18Upregulated COVID-19 patients PBMC (compared to normal PBMC)[49]Downregulates IL18 expression levels in lymphoblasts[69]
IL2Elevated blood level in severe patients[31]Reduces IL2 levels in T cells[73]
IL2RBDownregulated after treatment in severe cases (PBMC)[14]Inhibits JAK/STAT pathway activating IL2RB mutant Ba/F3 cells[93]
MCL1Downregulated after treatment in severe cases (PBMC)[14]Downregulates expression level in lymphoblasts[94]
PDCD1Increased levels on T cells[50]Decreases PDCD1 levels in T cells[95]
CCL2Upregulated COVID-19 patients BALF (compared to normal BALF) Elevated blood level in severe patients[32,49]Reduces secreted protein levels in bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells[96]
CRPElevated blood level in severe patients[10,12,13,18,29]Reduces CRP level[97]
IL1BElevated blood level in severe patients[11,15,27]Downregulates expression in T cells[98]
IL4Elevated blood level in severe patients[27]Reduces IL4 levels in patients[99]
IL6Elevated blood level in severe patients[10,11,29,31,32,50,53,66,100,[13], [14], [15], [16], [17],19,24,27]Downregulates IL6 expression level in lymphoblast[69]
TNFElevated blood level in severe patients[11,15,32]Reduces the expression in mast cells[101]

PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cells; BALF bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cells.

7. Conclusion

It is clear that ruxolitinib has an important potential in overcoming complications caused by immune hyperactivation related to the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Since the JAK/STAT pathway is associated with the induction of multiple molecular immune pathways, inhibition of this pathway may result in the inhibition of several cellular responses Considered together, ruxolitinib has potential in the treatment of COVID-19 infection; however, adverse effects such as opportunistic infections as a result of immune suppression must also be considered.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

Graphical abstract and Figure 1-3 were created by using BioRender.

Biographies

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is fx1_lrg.jpg

Bakiye Goker Bagca is a PhD student in Medical Biology Department at Ege University and she is a research assistant in this department. Her master thesis includes JAK/STAT pathway regulation and the effects of ruxolitinib in leukemic and healthy cells. She is taking roles in research projects including IL6 signaling regulation.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is fx2_lrg.jpg

Cigir Biray Avci, PhD, is an Associate Professor in Medical Biology Department Ege University Medical School. She has numerous research and review papers including IL6 signaling, JAK/STAT signaling, and cross-talks about the other cellular signaling pathways. She is supervising various research projects about genetic and epigenetic regulation of molecular signaling.

References

1. World Health Organization (WHO) 2020. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report 1.https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200121-sitrep-1-2019-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=20a99c10_4 (accessed July 17, 2020) [Google Scholar]
2. World Health Organization (WHO) 2020. COVID-19 Situation Report 148.https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200616-covid-19-sitrep-148-draft.pdf?sfvrsn=9b2015e9_2 (accessed July 17, 2020) [Google Scholar]
3. Gorbalenya A.E., Baker S.C., Baric R.S., de Groot R.J., Drosten C., Gulyaeva A.A., Haagmans B.L., Lauber C., Leontovich A.M., Neuman B.W., Penzar D., Perlman S., Poon L.L.M., Samborskiy D.V., Sidorov I.A., Sola I., Ziebuhr J. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Microbiol. 2020;5:536–544. 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Kim D., Lee J.Y., Yang J.S., Kim J.W., Kim V.N., Chang H. The architecture of SARS-CoV-2 transcriptome. Cell. 2020;181 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.011. 914–921.e10. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Walls A.C., Park Y.J., Tortorici M.A., Wall A., McGuire A.T., Veesler D. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell. 2020;181 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058. 281–292.e6. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Zeng W., Liu G., Ma H., Zhao D., Yang Y., Liu M., Mohammed A., Zhao C., Yang Y., Xie J., Ding C., Ma X., Weng J., Gao Y., He H., Jin T. Biochemical characterization of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020;527:618–623. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.04.136. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Yang N., Shen H.M. Targeting the endocytic pathway and autophagy process as a novel therapeutic strategy in COVID-19. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020;16:1724–1731. 10.7150/ijbs.45498. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Alanagreh L., Alzoughool F., Atoum M. The human coronavirus disease covid-19: its origin, characteristics, and insights into potential drugs and its mechanisms. Pathogens. 2020;9:331. 10.3390/pathogens9050331. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Zheng J. SARS-coV-2: An emerging coronavirus that causes a global threat. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020;16:1678–1685. 10.7150/ijbs.45053. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Wang Z., Yang B., Li Q., Wen L., Zhang R. Clinical features of 69 cases with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 10.1093/cid/ciaa272. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 16] [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Li X., Xu S., Yu M., Wang K., Tao Y., Zhou Y., Shi J., Zhou M., Wu B., Yang Z., Zhang C., Yue J., Zhang Z., Renz H., Liu X., Xie J., Xie M., Zhao J. Risk factors for severity and mortality in adult COVID-19 inpatients in Wuhan. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.006. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 12] [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Gautier J.F., Ravussin Y. A new symptom of COVID-19: loss of taste and smell. Obesity. 2020;28:848. 10.1002/oby.22809. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Liu F., Li L., Da Xu M., Wu J., Luo D., Zhu Y.S., Li B.X., Song X.Y., Zhou X. Prognostic value of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in patients with COVID-19. J. Clin. Virol. 2020;127:104370. 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104370. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Yuan J., Zou R., Zeng L., Kou S., Lan J., Li X., Liang Y., Ding X., Tan G., Tan S., Liu L., Liu Y., Pan Y., Wang Z. The correlation between viral clearance and biochemical outcomes of 94 COVID-19 infected discharged patients. Inflamm. Res. 2020;69:599–606. 10.1007/s00011-020-01342-0. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Ouyang Y., Yin J., Wang W., Shi H., Shi Y., Xu B., Qiao L., Feng Y., Pang L., Wei F., Guo X., Jin R., Chen D. Down-regulated gene expression spectrum and immune responses changed during the disease progression in COVID-19 patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 10.1093/cid/ciaa462. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 20] [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Chen G., Wu D., Guo W., Cao Y., Huang D., Wang H., Wang T., Zhang X., Chen H., Yu H., Zhang X., Zhang M., Wu S., Song J., Chen T., Han M., Li S., Luo X., Zhao J., Ning Q. Clinical and immunologic features in severe and moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130:2620–2629. 10.1172/JCI137244. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Qin C., Zhou L., Hu Z., Zhang S., Yang S., Tao Y., Xie C., Ma K., Shang K., Wang W., Tian D.S. Dysregulation of immune response in patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 10.1093/cid/ciaa248. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 12] [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Chen L., Liu H.G., Liu W., Liu J., Liu K., Shang J., Deng Y., Wei S. Analysis of clinical features of 29 patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020;43:E005. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2020.03.013. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Xu B., Yu FAN C., Lu Wang A., Long ZOU Y., Han Yu Y., He C., Guang XIA W., Xian Zhang J., Miao Q. Suppressed T cell-mediated immunity in patients with COVID-19: a clinical retrospective study in Wuhan, China. J. Infect. 2020;81:e51–e60. 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.012. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Wang C., Kang K., Gao Y., Ye M., Lan X., Li X., Zhao M., Yu K. Cytokine levels in the body fluids of a patient with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a case report. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020 10.7326/L20-0354. [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 12] [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Wölfel R., Corman V.M., Guggemos W., Seilmaier M., Zange S., Müller M.A., Niemeyer D., Jones T.C., Vollmar P., Rothe C., Hoelscher M., Bleicker T., Brünink S., Schneider J., Ehmann R., Zwirglmaier K., Drosten C., Wendtner C. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020;581:465–469. 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Wang W., Xu Y., Gao R., Lu R., Han K., Wu G., Tan W. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA. 2020;323:1843–1844. 10.1001/jama.2020.3786. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Yu F., Yan L., Wang N., Yang S., Wang L., Tang Y., Gao G., Wang S., Ma C., Xie R., Wang F., Tan C., Zhu L., Guo Y., Zhang F. Quantitative detection and viral load analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in infected patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 10.1093/cid/ciaa345. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 28] [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Zheng Y., Sun L.-J., Xu M., Pan J., Zhang Y.-T., Fang X.-L., Fang Q., Cai H.-L. Clinical characteristics of 34 COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care unit in Hangzhou, China. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 2020;21:378–387. 10.1631/jzus.B2000174. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Guan W.J., Ni Z.Y., Hu Y.Y.H., Liang W.H., Ou C.Q., He J.X., Liu L., Shan H., Lei C.L., Hui D.S.C., Du B., Li L.J., Zeng G., Yuen K.Y., Chen R.C., Tang C.L., Wang T., Chen P.Y., Xiang J., Li S.S.Y., Wang J.L.J.M., Liang Z.J., Peng Y.X., Wei L., Liu Y., Hu Y.Y.H., Peng P., Wang J.L.J.M., Liu J.Y., Chen Z., Li G., Zheng Z.J., Qiu S.Q., Luo J., Ye C.J., Zhu S.Y., Zhong N.S., Chen G., Wu D., Guo W., Cao Y., Huang D., Wang H., Wang T., Zhang X.X., Chen H., Yu H., Zhang X.X., Zhang M., Wu S., Song J., Chen T., Han M., Li S.S.Y., Luo X., Zhao J., Ning Q. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. New Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1708–1720. 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Nguyen A., David J.K., Maden S.K., Wood M.A., Weeder B.R., Nellore A., Thompson R.F. Human leukocyte antigen susceptibility map for SARS-CoV-2. J. Virol. 2020;94:e00510–e00520. 10.1128/jvi.00510-20. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Hong K.S., Lee K.H., Chung J.H., Shin K.C., Choi E.Y., Jin H.J., Jang J.G., Lee W., Ahn J.H. Clinical features and outcomes of 98 patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Daegu, South Korea: a brief descriptive study. Yonsei Med. J. 2020;61:431–437. 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.5.431. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Mehta P., McAuley D.F., Brown M., Sanchez E., Tattersall R.S., Manson J.J. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395:1033–1034. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. van Kraaij T.D.A., Mostard R.L., Ramiro S., Magro Checa C., van Dongen C.M., van Haren E.H., Buijs J., Landewé R.B. Tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 pneumonia and concomitant cytokine release syndrome. Eur. J. Case Rep. Intern. Med. 2020;7:1675. 10.12890/2020_001675. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Radbel J., Narayanan N., Bhatt P.J. Use of tocilizumab for COVID-19-Induced cytokine release syndrome: a cautionary case report. Chest. 2020 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.024. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 25] [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Liu J., Li S., Liu J., Liang B., Wang X., Wang H., Li W., Tong Q., Yi J., Zhao L., Xiong L., Guo C., Tian J., Luo J., Yao J., Pang R., Shen H., Peng C., Liu T., Zhang Q., Wu J., Xu L., Lu S., Wang B., Weng Z., Han C., Zhu H., Zhou R., Zhou H., Chen X., Ye P., Zhu B., Wang L., Zhou W., He S., He Y., Jie S., Wei P., Zhang J., Lu Y., Wang W., Zhang L., Li L., Zhou F., Wang J., Dittmer U., Lu M., Hu Y., Yang D., Zheng X. Longitudinal characteristics of lymphocyte responses and cytokine profiles in the peripheral blood of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. EBioMedicine. 2020;55:102763. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102763. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Li S., Jiang L., Li X., Lin F., Wang Y., Li B., Jiang T., An W., Liu S., Liu H., Xu P., Zhao L., Zhang L., Mu J., Wang H., Kang J., Li Y., Huang L., Zhu C., Zhao S., Lu J., Ji J., Zhao J. Clinical and pathological investigation of severe COVID-19 patients. JCI Insight. 2020;5:138070. 10.1172/jci.insight.138070. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Sedaghat Z., Karimi N. Guillain Barre syndrome associated with COVID-19 infection: a case report. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2020;76:233–235. 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.04.062. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Lazarian G., Quinquenel A., Bellal M., Siavellis J., Jacquy C., Re D., Merabet F., Mekinian A., Braun T., Damaj G., Delmer A., Cymbalista F. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia associated with Covid-19 infection. Br. J. Haematol. 2020 10.1111/bjh.16794. [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 6] [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Moriguchi T., Harii N., Goto J., Harada D., Sugawara H., Takamino J., Ueno M., Sakata H., Kondo K., Myose N., Nakao A., Takeda M., Haro H., Inoue O., Suzuki-Inoue K., Kubokawa K., Ogihara S., Sasaki T., Kinouchi H., Kojin H., Ito M., Onishi H., Shimizu T., Sasaki Y., Enomoto N., Ishihara H., Furuya S., Yamamoto T., Shimada S. A first case of meningitis/encephalitis associated with SARS-Coronavirus-2. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;94:55–58. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.062. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Tchesnokov E.P., Feng J.Y., Porter D.P., Götte M. Mechanism of inhibition of ebola virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase by remdesivir. Viruses. 2019;11:326. 10.3390/v11040326. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Grein J., Ohmagari N., Shin D., Diaz G., Asperges E., Castagna A., Feldt T., Green G., Green M.L., Lescure F.-X., Nicastri E., Oda R., Yo K., Quiros-Roldan E., Studemeister A., Redinski J., Ahmed S., Bernett J., Chelliah D., Chen D., Chihara S., Cohen S.H., Cunningham J., D’Arminio Monforte A., Ismail S., Kato H., Lapadula G., L’Her E., Maeno T., Majumder S., Massari M., Mora-Rillo M., Mutoh Y., Nguyen D., Verweij E., Zoufaly A., Osinusi A.O., DeZure A., Zhao Y., Zhong L., Chokkalingam A., Elboudwarej E., Telep L., Timbs L., Henne I., Sellers S., Cao H., Tan S.K., Winterbourne L., Desai P., Mera R., Gaggar A., Myers R.P., Brainard D.M., Childs R., Flanigan T. Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2327–2336. 10.1056/nejmoa2007016. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Mauthe M., Orhon I., Rocchi C., Zhou X., Luhr M., Hijlkema K.J., Coppes R.P., Engedal N., Mari M., Reggiori F. Chloroquine inhibits autophagic flux by decreasing autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Autophagy. 2018;14:1435–1455. 10.1080/15548627.2018.1474314. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
39. Gao J., Hu S. Update on use of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Biosci. Trends. 2020;14:156–158. 10.5582/bst.2020.03072. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
40. Voshavar C. Protease inhibitors for the treatment of HIV/AIDS: recent advances and future challenges. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2019;19:1571–1598. 10.2174/1568026619666190619115243. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Cao B., Wang Y., Wen D., Liu W., Wang J., Fan G., Ruan L., Song B., Cai Y., Wei M., Li X., Xia J., Chen N., Xiang J., Yu T., Bai T., Xie X., Zhang L., Li C., Yuan Y., Chen H., Li H., Huang H., Tu S., Gong F., Liu Y., Wei Y., Dong C., Zhou F., Gu X., Xu J., Liu Z., Zhang Y., Li H., Shang L., Wang K., Li K., Zhou X., Dong X., Qu Z., Lu S., Hu X., Ruan S., Luo S., Wu J., Peng L., Cheng F., Pan L., Zou J., Jia C., Wang J., Liu X., Wang S., Wu X., Ge Q., He J., Zhan H., Qiu F., Guo L., Huang C., Jaki T., Hayden F.G., Horby P.W., Zhang D., Wang C. A trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
42. Duan K., Liu B., Li C., Zhang H., Yu T., Qu J., Zhou M., Chen L., Meng S., Hu Y., Peng C., Yuan M., Huang J., Wang Z., Yu J., Gao X., Wang D., Yu X., Li L., Zhang J., Wu X., Li B., Xu Y., Chen W., Peng Y., Hu Y., Lin L., Liu X., Huang S., Zhou Z., Zhang L., Wang Y., Zhang Z., Deng K., Xia Z., Gong Q., Zhang W., Zheng X., Liu Y., Yang H., Zhou D., Yu D., Hou J., Shi Z., Chen S., Chen Z., Zhang X., Yang X. Effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2020;117:9490–9496. 10.1073/pnas.2004168117. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. de Monterrey H.S.J.T. ClinicalTrials.Gov; 2020. Safety in Convalescent Plasma Transfusion to COVID-19. [Google Scholar]
44. NCT04345523 . SOC for the Treatment of COVID19 in Hospitalized Patients. 2020. Convalescent plasma therapy vs.Https://Clinicaltrials.Gov/Show/NCT04345523. [Google Scholar]
45. Tang N., Bai H., Chen X., Gong J., Li D., Sun Z. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020;18:1094–1099. 10.1111/jth.14817. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
46. Li G., He X., Zhang L., Ran Q., Wang J., Xiong A., Wu D., Chen F., Sun J., Chang C. Assessing ACE2 expression patterns in lung tissues in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. J. Autoimmun. 2020 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102463. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 13] [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
47. Zang R., Castro M.F.G., McCune B.T., Zeng Q., Rothlauf P.W., Sonnek N.M., Liu Z., Brulois K.F., Wang X., Greenberg H.B., Diamond M.S., Ciorba M.A., Whelan S.P.J., Ding S. TMPRSS2 and TMPRSS4 mediate SARS-CoV-2 infection of human small intestinal enterocytes. BioRxiv. 2020;5:eabc3582. 10.1101/2020.04.21.054015. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
48. Ganji A., Farahani I., Khansarinejad B., Ghazavi A., Mosayebi G. Increased expression of CD8 marker on T-cells in COVID-19 patients. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2020;83:102437. 10.1016/j.bcmd.2020.102437. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
49. Xiong Y., Liu Y., Cao L., Wang D., Guo M., Jiang A., Guo D., Hu W., Yang J., Tang Z., Wu H., Lin Y., Zhang M., Zhang Q., Shi M., Liu Y., Zhou Y., Lan K., Chen Y. Transcriptomic characteristics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in COVID-19 patients. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020;9:761–770. 10.1080/22221751.2020.1747363. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
50. Diao B., Wang C., Tan Y., Chen X., Liu Y., Ning L., Chen L., Li M., Liu Y., Wang G., Yuan Z., Feng Z., Wu Y., Chen Y. Reduction and functional exhaustion of t cells in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) MedRxiv. 2020;11:827. 10.1101/2020.02.18.20024364. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
51. Zheng M., Gao Y., Wang G., Song G., Liu S., Sun D., Xu Y., Tian Z. Functional exhaustion of antiviral lymphocytes in COVID-19 patients. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020;17:533–535. 10.1038/s41423-020-0402-2. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
52. Yang Y., Shen C., Li J., Yuan J., Wei J., Huang F., Wang F., Li G., Li Y., Xing L., Peng L., Yang M., Cao M., Zheng H., Wu W., Zou R., Li D., Xu Z., Wang H., Zhang M., Zhang Z., Gao G.F., Jiang C., Liu L., Liu Y. Plasma IP-10 and MCP-3 levels are highly associated with disease severity and predict the progression of COVID-19. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.027. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 29] [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
53. Wan S., Yi Q., Fan S., Lv J., Zhang X., Guo L., Lang C., Xiao Q., Xiao K., Yi Z., Qiang M., Xiang J., Zhang B., Chen Y., Gao C. Relationships among lymphocyte subsets, cytokines, and the pulmonary inflammation index in coronavirus (COVID-19) infected patients. Br. J. Haematol. 2020;189:428–437. 10.1111/bjh.16659. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
54. Leung J.M., Yang C.X., Tam A., Shaipanich T., Hackett T.-L., Singhera G.K., Dorscheid D.R., Sin D.D. ACE-2 expression in the small airway epithelia of smokers and COPD patients: implications for COVID-19. Eur. Respir. J. 2020;55:2000688. 10.1183/13993003.00688-2020. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
55. Zhang J.M., An J. Cytokines, inflammation, and pain. Int. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2007;45:27–37. 10.1097/AIA.0b013e318034194e. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
56. Villarino A.V., Kanno Y., Ferdinand J.R., O’Shea J.J. Mechanisms of Jak/STAT signaling in immunity and disease. J. Immunol. 2015;194:21–27. 10.4049/jimmunol.1401867. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
57. Garrido-Trigo A., Salas A. Molecular structure and function of Janus kinases: implications for the development of inhibitors. J. Crohns Colitis. 2019 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz206. [published online ahead of print, 2019 Dec 27] [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
58. Seif F., Khoshmirsafa M., Aazami H., Mohsenzadegan M., Sedighi G., Bahar M. The role of JAK-STAT signaling pathway and its regulators in the fate of T helper cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2017;15:23. 10.1186/s12964-017-0177-y. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
59. Lee M., Rhee I. Cytokine signaling in tumor progression. Immune Netw. 2017;17:214–227. 10.4110/in.2017.17.4.214. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
60. Velazquez-Salinas L., Verdugo-Rodriguez A., Rodriguez L.L., Borca M.V. The role of interleukin 6 during viral infections. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1057. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01057. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
61. McInnes I.B., Byers N.L., Higgs R.E., Lee J., Macias W.L., Na S., Ortmann R.A., Rocha G., Rooney T.P., Wehrman T., Zhang X., Zuckerman S.H., Taylor P.C. Comparison of baricitinib, upadacitinib, and tofacitinib mediated regulation of cytokine signaling in human leukocyte subpopulations. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2019;21:183. 10.1186/s13075-019-1964-1. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
62. Markham A., Keam S.J. Peficitinib: first global approval. Drugs. 2019;79:887–891. 10.1007/s40265-019-01131-y. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
63. Blair H.A. Fedratinib: first approval. Drugs. 2019;79:1719–1725. 10.1007/s40265-019-01205-x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
64. Richardson P., Griffin I., Tucker C., Smith D., Oechsle O., Phelan A., Stebbing J. Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease. Lancet. 2020;395:e30–e31. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30304-4. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
65. Praveen D., Chowdary P.R., Aanandhi M.V. BARICITINIB - a Januase kinase inhibitor - not an ideal option for management of Covid 19. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2020;55:105967. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105967. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
66. Luo P., Liu Y., Qiu L., Liu X., Liu D., Li J. Tocilizumab treatment in COVID-19: a single center experience. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:814–818. 10.1002/jmv.25801. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
67. Göker Bağca B. Ruxolitinib and effect mechanisms. Istanbul Bilim. Univ. Florence Nightingale J. Med. 2016;2:153–157. 10.5606/fng.btd.2016.028. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
68. Caocci G., La Nasa G. Could ruxolitinib be effective in patients with COVID-19 infection at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)? Ann. Hematol. 2020;14:1–2. 10.1007/s00277-020-04067-6. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
69. Kusoglu A., Bagca B.G., Ozates Ay N.P., Saydam G., Avci C.B. Ruxolitinib regulates the autophagy machinery in multiple myeloma cells. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2020 10.2174/1871520620666200218105159. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Feb 17] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
70. González Vicent M., Molina B., González de Pablo J., Castillo A., Díaz M.Á. Ruxolitinib treatment for steroid refractory acute and chronic graft vs host disease in children: clinical and immunological results. Am. J. Hematol. 2019;94:319–326. 10.1002/ajh.25376. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
71. Meng G., Wang J., Wang X., Wang Y., Wang Z. Ruxolitinib treatment for SR-aGVHD in patients with EBV-HLH undergoing allo-HSCT. Ann. Hematol. 2020;99:343–349. 10.1007/s00277-019-03864-y. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
72. Gavegnano C., Detorio M., Montero C., Bosque A., Planelles V., Schinazi R.F. Ruxolitinib and tofacitinib are potent and selective inhibitors of HIV-1 replication and virus reactivation in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:1977–1986. 10.1128/AAC.02496-13. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
73. Gavegnano C., Brehm J.H., Dupuy F.P., Talla A., Ribeiro S.P., Kulpa D.A., Cameron C., Santos S., Hurwitz S.J., Marconi V.C., Routy J.P., Sabbagh L., Schinazi R.F., Sékaly R.P. Novel mechanisms to inhibit HIV reservoir seeding using Jak inhibitors. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006740. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006740. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
74. Manganaro L., Hong P., Hernandez M.M., Argyle D., Mulder L.C.F., Potla U., Diaz-Griffero F., Lee B., Fernandez-Sesma A., Simon V. IL-15 regulates susceptibility of CD4+ T cells to HIV infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2018;115:E9659–E9667. 10.1073/pnas.1806695115. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
75. Spivak A.M., Larragoite E.T., Coletti M.K.L., Macedo A.B., Martins L.J., Bosque A., Planelles V. Janus kinase inhibition suppresses PKC-induced cytokine release without affecting HIV-1 latency reversal ex vivo. Retrovirology. 2016;13:88. 10.1186/s12977-016-0319-0. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
76. Onozawa E., Shibayama H., Takada H., Imadome K.I., Aoki S., Yoshimori M., Shimizu N., Fujiwara S., Koyama T., Miura O., Arai A. STAT3 is constitutively activated in chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection and can be a therapeutic target. Oncotarget. 2018;9:31077–31089. 10.18632/oncotarget.25780. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
77. Jin Z., Wang Y., Wang J., Zhang J., Wu L., Wang Z. Long-term survival benefit of ruxolitinib in a patient with relapsed refractory chronic active Epstein–Barr virus. Ann. Hematol. 2019;98:2003–2004. 10.1007/s00277-019-03647-5. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
78. Reoma L.B., Trindade C.J., Monaco M.C., Solis J., Montojo M.G., Vu P., Johnson K., Beck E., Nair G., Khan O.I., Quezado M., Hewitt S.M., Reich D.S., Childs R., Nath A. Fatal encephalopathy with wild-type JC virus and ruxolitinib therapy. Ann. Neurol. 2019;86:878–884. 10.1002/ana.25608. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
79. Ballesta B., González H., Martín V., Ballesta J.J. Fatal ruxolitinib-related JC virus meningitis. J. Neurovirol. 2017;23:783–785. 10.1007/s13365-017-0558-4. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
80. Gavegnano C., Bassit L.C., Cox B.D., Hsiao H.-M., Johnson E.L., Suthar M., Chakraborty R., Schinazi R.F. Jak inhibitors modulate production of replication competent zika virus in human Hofbauer, trophoblasts, and neuroblastoma cells. Pathog. Immun. 2017;2:199–218. 10.20411/pai.v2i2.190. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
81. Wang H., Xin X., Wang M., Han L., Li J., Hao Y., Zheng C., Shen C. Myxovirus resistance protein A inhibits hepatitis C virus replication through JAK-STAT pathway activation. Arch. Virol. 2018;163:1429–1438. 10.1007/s00705-018-3748-3. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
82. Perricone G., Vinci M., Pungolino E. Occult hepatitis B infection reactivation after ruxolitinib therapy. Dig. Liver Dis. 2017;49:719. 10.1016/j.dld.2017.03.004. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
83. Kusano Y., Terui Y., Ueda K., Hatake K. Epstein-Barr virus gastric ulcer associated with ruxolitinib. Ann. Hematol. 2016;95:1741–1742. 10.1007/s00277-016-2748-1. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
84. Eyal O., Flaschner M., Ben Yehuda A., Rund D. Varicella-zoster virus meningoencephalitis in a patient treated with ruxolitinib. Am. J. Hematol. 2017;92:E74–E75. 10.1002/ajh.24688. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
85. Von Hofsten J., Forsberg M.J., Zetterberg M. Cytomegalovirus retinitis in a patient who received ruxolitinib. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:296–297. 10.1056/NEJMc1413918. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
86. Zhao Y., Shi J., Luo Y., Gao F., Tan Y., Lai X., Yu J., Wei G., Huang H. Calcineurin inhibitors replacement by ruxolitinib as graft-versus-Host disease prophylaxis for patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020;26:e128–e133. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.01.012. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
87. Dang S.-H., Liu Q., Xie R., Shen N., Zhou S., Shi W., Liu W., Zou P., You Y., Zhong Z.-D. Ruxolitinib add-on in corticosteroid-refractory graft-vs-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: results from a retrospective study on 38 Chinese patients. World J. Clin. Cases. 2020;8:1065–1073. 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i6.1065. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
88. Tong L.X., Jackson J., Kerstetter J., Worswick S.D. Reactivation of herpes simplex virus infection in a patient undergoing ruxolitinib treatment. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2014;70:e59–e60. 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.035. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
89. Pálmason R., Lindén O., Richter J. Case-report: EBV driven lymphoproliferative disorder associated with Ruxolitinib. BMC Hematol. 2015;15:10. 10.1186/s12878-015-0029-1. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
90. Tasian S.K., Casas J.A., Posocco D., Gandre-Babbe S., Gagne A.L., Liang G., Loh M.L., Weiss M.J., French D.L., Chou S.T. Mutation-specific signaling profiles and kinase inhibitor sensitivities of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells. Leukemia. 2019;33:181–190. 10.1038/s41375-018-0169-y. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
91. Febvre-James M., Lecureur V., Augagneur Y., Mayati A., Fardel O. Repression of interferon β-regulated cytokines by the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in inflammatory human macrophages. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2018;54:354–365. 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.11.032. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
92. Pattison M.J., MacKenzie K.F., Arthur J.S.C. Inhibition of JAKs in macrophages increases lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine production by blocking IL-10–mediated feedback. J. Immunol. 2012;189:2784–2792. 10.4049/jimmunol.1200310. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
93. Roberts K.G., Yang Y.-L., Payne-Turner D., Lin W., Files J.K., Dickerson K., Gu Z., Taunton J., Janke L.J., Chen T., Loh M.L., Hunger S.P., Mullighan C.G. Oncogenic role and therapeutic targeting of ABL-class and JAK-STAT activating kinase alterations in Ph-like ALL. Blood Adv. 2017;20:1657–1671. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017011296. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
94. Ishida S., Akiyama H., Umezawa Y., Okada K., Nogami A., Oshikawa G., Nagao T., Miura O. Mechanisms for mTORC1 activation and synergistic induction of apoptosis by ruxolitinib and BH3 mimetics or autophagy inhibitors in JAK2-V617F-expressing leukemic cells including newly established PVTL-2. Oncotarget. 2018;9:26834–26851. 10.18632/oncotarget.25515. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
95. Lu C., Talukder A., Savage N.M., Singh N., Liu K. JAK-STAT-mediated chronic inflammation impairs cytotoxic T lymphocyte activation to decrease anti-PD-1 immunotherapy efficacy in pancreatic cancer. OncoImmunology. 2017;6:e1291106. 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1291106. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
96. Zacharaki D., Ghazanfari R., Li H., Lim H.C., Scheding S. Effects of JAK1/2 inhibition on bone marrow stromal cells of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients and healthy individuals. Eur. J. Haematol. 2018;101:57–67. 10.1111/ejh.13079. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
97. Febvre-James M., Lecureur V., Fardel O. Potent repression of C-reactive protein (CRP) expression by the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in inflammatory human hepatocytes. Inflamm. Res. 2020;69:51–62. 10.1007/s00011-019-01293-1. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
98. Parampalli Yajnanarayana S., Stübig T., Cornez I., Alchalby H., Schönberg K., Rudolph J., Triviai I., Wolschke C., Heine A., Brossart P., Kröger N., Wolf D. JAK1/2 inhibition impairs T cell function in vitro and in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Br. J. Haematol. 2015;169:824–833. 10.1111/bjh.13373. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
99. Tabarroki A., Lindner D.J., Visconte V., Zhang L., Rogers H.J., Parker Y., Duong H.K., Lichtin A., Kalaycio M.E., Sekeres M.A., Mountantonakis S.E., Heresi G.A., Tiu R.V. Ruxolitinib leads to improvement of pulmonary hypertension in patients with myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2014;28:1486–1493. 10.1038/leu.2014.5. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
100. Zhang S., Gan J., Chen B.-G., Zheng D., Zhang J.-G., Lin R.-H., Zhou Y.-P., Yang W.-Y., Lin A., Yan W.-H. Dynamics of peripheral immune cells and their HLA-G and receptor expressions in a patient suffering from critical COVID-19 pneumonia to convalescence. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2020;9:e1128. 10.1002/cti2.1128. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
101. Hermans M.A.W., Schrijver B., van Holten-Neelen C.C.P.A., Gerth van Wijk R., van Hagen P.M., van Daele P.L.A., Dik W.A. The JAK1/JAK2- inhibitor ruxolitinib inhibits mast cell degranulation and cytokine release. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2018;48:1412–1420. 10.1111/cea.13217. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/85529098
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/85529098

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.06.013

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
2
70
0

Article citations


Go to all (61) article citations

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.