Egalpin/skip indexes minor changes

[egalpin]

Relates to #12414. Minor naming changes based on PR comments.

cc/ @Jackie-Jiang @gortiz

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.61538% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 61.73%. Comparing base (59551e4) to head (9935222).
Report is 34 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...pinot/core/query/request/context/QueryContext.java	33.33%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #12514      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     61.75%   61.73%   -0.02%     
  Complexity      207      207              
============================================
  Files          2436     2450      +14     
  Lines        133233   133552     +319     
  Branches      20636    20692      +56     
============================================
+ Hits          82274    82451     +177     
- Misses        44911    44998      +87     
- Partials       6048     6103      +55     

Flag	Coverage Δ
custom-integration1	<0.01% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
integration	<0.01% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
integration1	<0.01% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
integration2	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
java-11	61.66% <84.61%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
java-21	61.61% <84.61%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
skip-bytebuffers-false	61.72% <84.61%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
skip-bytebuffers-true	61.56% <84.61%> (+33.83%)	⬆️
temurin	61.73% <84.61%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
unittests	61.73% <84.61%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
unittests1	46.88% <84.61%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests2	27.70% <0.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Jackie-Jiang]

Thank you!

[Jackie-Jiang]

Can you please take a look at the test failures?

[egalpin]

@Jackie-Jiang all set, I believe the first tests that failed were due to noisy remote test environment. I tried to make a change to account for the failures in 733d179, which was simply misguided.

[Jackie-Jiang]

Thank you for addressing the comments! Can you help contribute this new query option to the pinot doc?