Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser/2012-01

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests | Checkuser
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Vituzzu in topic Requests

Requests

Latest comment: 12 years ago96 comments27 people in discussion

100범@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
100범 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Tcisfas (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Givnofen (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Lagnaqar (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): 100범 is a user blocked in kowp. Now he or she with the accounts above is using machine translation to "create" rough articles about people in Korean history, and most of them have to be deleted speedily. This has no difference with vandalism . Zhxy 519 12:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

It seems to me that the following accounts may be related:

  • 100범 = Rurun = Nausbisk
  • Givnofen
  • Difficure
  • Dusosansin
  • Lagnakard
  • Lagnaqa
  • Dawtow
  • Tcisfas
  • Ikass
  • Poreth
  • Cscheonsh

es:Magister Mathematicae 21:10, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Jancen sergio@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Jancen sergio (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Isadora Castro (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): The user Jancen sergio created the page cited and is about to be eliminated per proposed deletion. Isadora Castro remove the sticker. I have my doubts, but is likely to be the same user. Sorry for bad english. PcTalk 00:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be related. es:Magister Mathematicae 02:05, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Southstock@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Southstock (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
187.37.245.8 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): IP address already blocked by abusive behavior. The user account specified in this request is suspected to been the same IP author, with a open block request. Willy Weazley 17:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Please, check with Marcus_Luccas@pt.wikipedia too. Both users have a similar behavior, attacking the same user. Desempates 17:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

BauruEri and Southstock are sockpuppets, and, at least for the moment, I have no evidences to investigate Marcus Luccas too. 187.37.245.8 is Unrelated Unrelated. --Vituzzu 19:40, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Please check Quintinense. BauruEri/Southstock is very interessed of articles edited by socks of Quintinense (Lidbergue, for example). This articles edited by BauruEri is edited by Quintinense. View contribuitions of the users.--189.100.71.245 22:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Kalogeropoulos@elwikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Kalogeropoulos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
46.246.169.245 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Bullies users as an IP. Actions include threats and pejorative labels (i.e., hate speech) and ganging up on victims by making them the subject of ridicule. The sysop is already known for acting as an ip and there are at least 2+1 recent examples from the past where he did abuse his rights after acting as an ip. Requested on elwikipedia [1] and redirrected here, since there is no CU on el wiki. Peter.S.Hunt 07:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Not done, doing this check will release private information about Kalogeropoulos. From your description above it is not sufficient to convince me to do so according to the Access to and release of personally identifiable information in the Privacy Policy. Unless, of course, Kalogeropoulos agrees to this check. Bencmq 07:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
The check is necessary, he threatens users not to write. His behaviour (if proven) leads to a removal of sysop rights according to the policy of el wiki. I urge you to see the last CU and contact the steward who performed it, he is able to provide more insight about this case.Peter.S.Hunt 07:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
I disagree with Bencmq about this, based on Freemans comments when this user was last checked here: october. Did the request and can say that users are Likely Likely sockpuppets. Same ISP, same UserAgent, but that specific IP has not been used by Kalogeropoulos. Laaknor 08:18, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Sure, didn't know about that part in the archive. Bencmq 07:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

BauruEri@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
BauruEri (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Edmilson Quebra-força (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Quintinense (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alberto neumann (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Biantez (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): All users have the same pattern, editing same articles. Edmilson Quebra-força and Quintinense are already blocked for creating sock puppets. I think that BauruEri and others are, actually, the same person, once they are editing the same group of articles in a very similar way.

This list may be useful: List of Quintinense's sockpuppets. Thank you! Desempates 04:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Edmilson Quebra-força and Biantez accounts are too old for verification and correlation to the recent ones.
Do you have any recent possible blocked sockpuppet ? es:Magister Mathematicae 05:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Please, try Marcus_Luccas@pt.wikipedia and Observadordocarnaval@pt.wikipedia . Thanks Desempates 05:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Alberto neumann edits are too old to verify.
Observadordocarnaval edits are too old to verify.
BauruEri does not seem related to Marcus Luccas.
closing as not conclusive. es:Magister Mathematicae 05:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm not Quintinense sock, and have more and not just because I edit on carnaval. it has a check up on me, including the Quintinense mentioned that I am from another user. ok!!---Biantez msg 3:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Bqa m@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Joaquim C. Sousa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
A. Stein (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Mendes Pinto (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Bqa m (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): This user is returning to edit the articles which were confirmed further checks. Applicant's use of puppets for this user. Halleltalk 01:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
These three accounts are already block, so, what is to be checked? --Vituzzu 02:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Needs to be checked if the account is a puppet Bqa these accounts other relatively. Halleltalk 02:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Actually my answers has been given while you were asking a check about three already blocked accounts, anyway  Confirmed the last account you added (Bqa m) matches Cm.ferreira.UNL and both of them are Sousa/Pinto's sockpuppets, btw there's no point in using the "bloqueio automático desabilitado" option with these accounts. --Vituzzu 02:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Tiagogarciac@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Tiagogarciac (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
TADSPT (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Block evasion / vandalism in pages of dates. Francisco 22:48, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Is there more evidence of abuse? At the moment  It looks like a duck to me. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes, these pages are January 13, January 14, January 25 and September 25. Francisco 23:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed but there are no other accounts. PeterSymonds (talk) 09:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

天外使者@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
天外使者 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
覃伟雄 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
覃秀丽 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Since 2009, a serious of articles about en:Huang Xianfan was established among Wikipedia in most languages (usually) by different user like above. The article itself has value to be shown in Wikipedia but lacks of neutrality. Undoubtedly, they are making self-advertisement. Even now they are still active. I ask for your confirmation and I hope the whole meta may think about block them.Zhxy 519 02:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed:
    • Hardjie
    • Bluseword
    • 跨界神话
    • 汉牯佬1
    • 捉鬼大汉
    • 天外使者
    • 覃秀丽
  • Technically Unrelated Unrelated but apparently part of another sock farm:
    • 覃伟雄
    • Weiyutong
    • Fknilaomu

--PeterSymonds (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I have reported this to Steward requests/Global.--Zhxy 519 07:43, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Escoteiropotiguar@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
JefferNobreg (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Escoteiropotiguar (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Both users upload many images protected by copyright in the Commons, usually in the same locality (Rio Grande do Norte). See, for example: [5] and [6]. Marcos Elias de Oliveira Júnior 00:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
No user by the name "JefferNobreg", Escoteiropotiguar no other socks (Technically)--Shizhao 12:20, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

D'Alessandro@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Joe 9 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
D'Alessandro (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Block evasion. Francisco 11:58, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Unnecessary Unnecessary -  It looks like a duck to me. If there are no other users, a checkuser is unnecessary; it's quite clearly the same person. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Desempates@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Maddox (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): See below

Please check if Desempates[7] is related to Maddox[8] (please check in meta and wiki-pt). I have several suspicions that tie is an account used to circumvent the blocking of Maddox. I have some experience in deceive the checkuser, I know this is possible, but it is also possible to identify the geographic location of the accounts is the same. Here are several evidences indicated that Maddox is Desempates, but because of this check a who pointed "unrelated", some users no longer suspect of relations of accounts. See the evidences:

Time of account creation

Desempates made his first contribution in November 20, six days before the lock one month Maddox applied to a block that was more than previsible. During the month of November, edit offs often participating in discussions notabily criteria are well known, deletion of pages, like Maddox did.

Areas of unusual interest

Maddox was known about comics and television editing and TV-offs seem to like too, even attending an elimination voting on the subject. (Less than a month of registry)

Markings on quick elimination redirects with a history

Desempates marked redirects to History thing that Maddox has had and one of the disputes that led to me (Marcus Luccas). The redirect-labeled for ER, Desempates were also done by Marcus Luccas (I).

Fanaticism in scoring E.S.R.

Desempates whith less than one month record registered an various pages on the same subject for disposal semirrápida, which is why the lock had surrendered months before Maddox.

Requests of block against multiple users and disagreements with Marcus Luccas / Quintinense (I)

Desempates also very agile ask [blockages, even with the same so to speak Maddox's.

Insist of delete pages Marcus Luccas/Quintinense

Desempates also asked for quick elimination a page created by Marcus Luccas when the Jbribeiro1 the discussion he said "Any user is interested in moving this text to a personal page itself? The Quintinense not return anytime soon around here (and in turn, will xilindró pro again). The work looks good and need not be lost. Arthemius?". The proposition ERnesse again if it was not consensual, something characteristic of Maddox.

Language very similar to the Maddox

Also in pt:Wikipédia:Esplanada/propostas/Definição de critérios de notoriedade para sobrenomes (8dez2011) Desempates (has less than a month) shows extreme knowledge of Wikipedia's policies, such as "Wikipedia is not a primary source of data , "and" Wikipedia is not a dictionary, "(Maddox often cited pt:WP:WNE).

Alternate hours editing

Take into account also the days and hours in which both edit because offs and Maddox never edit while allowing change of geographic location or at least computer. When Maddox was blocked last time it was different than hitherto not requested review of the blockade, but was defended in its discussion page for playoffs, as seen from the section below.

Desempates instransigente defense of Maddox

When Maddox is blocked, Desempates will defend him and also here (WARNING THIS).

"Coincidences" detected by other user

Belanidia, Heitor and Vanthorn to have realized, though not explicitly stated, be a case of Duck.

Edit War in template

In Predefinição:Sabia que Maddox got confusion with the July 7 MachoCarioca, which led to the protection of the page on July 8. On December 23, Desempates got further blurring by the same reason.

Importance

Atually the community discusses the 11º block of the user Maddox (see). The debate may be influenced by the account Desempates. Moreover, the blockade fraud may be being made to perpetuate the destabilizing behavior of the user, previously disapproved by the community. In August, Maddox rounded a block, as can be seen in pt:Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Maddox/5 through the IP 201.75.67.198. He confirm the rounded a block, but no reblocked by its block has been canceled.

I ask you here to assess the merits of the application, not who is asking. And please do a thorough evaluation of results, paying attention to the possibility of the user to edit the home of a friend, public computer, or even lend a friend your password to another location edit for a time, to foil any checkusers. Keep in mind the importance of this case to the Wiki-pt, as the number of conflicts with other users is very high. 'Please clarify the relationship between Maddox and Desempates, if it is really "unrelated", or it may be "possible". Listen to the possibility of the user to have borrowed his account to a friend in another state for a few days, or posted to an lan-house as a way to deceive any check. So please check all logs that are shown. Already, thanks! Quintinense 17:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

This user requested this check is Marcus Luccas (Quintinense/Southstock/BauruEri). --189.100.69.197 19:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Not done I won't check anything without a local input, CU is not a revenge instrument. --Vituzzu 19:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
This is not a simple revenge, the arguments are all there. Forget for a moment that I did ask (argumentum ad hominem), judge for yourself whether the claims it makes sense or not, or contact any of those suspected of coincidences and ask to come here to endorse the request. Quintinense 21:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Btw the checkuser never "absolves" so I have to renew my not done. --Vituzzu 21:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Not understand. Quintinense 21:27, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I solicit the block of Quintinense (absing mutiple accounts), please. --189.100.69.197 22:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
  • I think the applicant of this check must be nuts... Anyway, to avoid suspicions, I authorize the sysops to perform this check.

Regards Desempates 22:50, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

↑ --Vituzzu 22:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Quintinense@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Quintinense (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Marcus Luccas (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Southstock (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
BauruEri (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Anderson Bueno Pereira (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): See below

Same reasons of two users

Southstock requested block of Desempates in pt.wiki. The user insered evidences of "Desempates is a probably sock of Maddox". Southstock is blocked of infinite time for "attack account". BauruEri is sock confirmed of Southstock, and he's blocked for infinite time. Quintinense traduzed the evidences of Southstock and requested check in Meta Wiki. This user "suspected" for Quintinense is Desempates. View block request.

Pages edited by BauruEri

BauruEri, sock of Southstock, edit pages of Carnaval, the same pages genre edited by Quintinense. This pages was edited by Quintinense or socks of Quintinense (for example, Lidbergue, proprius Quintinense, Mirim-mirim and FCPernambuco, and others).

Pages edited by Southstock

This first page created by Southstock is a user page of Quintinense sock. Southstock comented in the talk page of Pedroca Cerebral socks of Quintinense. The question is: How Southstock knew? View Southstock contribuitions, user page of Carnavalteresopolis and talk page of Pedroca Cerebral.

Thanks. --189.100.69.197 22:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Again? Which part of not done is hard to understand? --Vituzzu 22:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I not understand you. "Again"? Accept this check, I'm not Quintinense. --189.100.69.197 22:45, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
You have been asking for check for months, under various nicknames. --Vituzzu 22:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I swear I'm not a sock. --189.100.69.197 22:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Sansoorchi@fa.wikisource

Status:    Not done
List of users
Bellavista1957 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Rostamdastan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Solhosafa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): A very important RfA is taking place on Persian Wikisourec that is scheduled to be finished tomorrow. Today a user has appeared and voted in favor of Bellavista1957. Please have a look at his contributions which shows he is definitely not a newbie (moving the page and voting in an RfA). User:Sansoorchi uses the "Wikisource Farsi" phrase rather than "Persian Wikisource" or "Farsi Wikisource" that you can see at the above link (Bellavista1957 RfA which is in Both Persian and English). AMERICOPHILE 16:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
This is rather inappropriate considering your dispute, but this check is mainly Not done per the results of this request. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
I am not talking about checking Bellavista1957, Rostamdastan and Solhosafa against each other, but I made a request to check Sansoorchi to make it clear who really is (Bellavista1957 or Rostamdastan or Solhosafa)? Thanks AMERICOPHILE 16:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Sofiandreazza@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Sofiandreazza (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
BiaGagliardi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
BR101 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): The three users are doing the same edits in the same article. View [9], [10] and [11]. Sorry for bad English. PcTalk 18:16, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed, no other socks found.　Bencmq 12:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Gd.duraes@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Gd.duraes (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Dd.duraes (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Block evasion / succesive saves without using "preview" button. Francisco 18:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 It looks like a duck to me--Vituzzu 12:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Higor Douglas@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Gustavo Siqueira (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Marcus Luccas (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Rcandre (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): All four share edit patterns with Quintinense and his many socks (carnival and shopping center articles and its related requests for deletion). Higor Douglas already reveled on this request for bureaucrats that he is a meatpuppet (edit summary: "they called me, so i'm here"). Gustavo Siqueira is also a suspected meatpuppet of Quintinense, and Marcus Luccas itself was blocked for being a sock of Quintinense. Higor, Gustavo and Rcandre are now voting on a request for adminship, where at least three other users said they were suspicious of Higor sudden appearance. viniciusmc 22:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Doing... @Vituzzu, I already performed a CheckUser, but I'd like to hear your opinion. Trijnstel 22:58, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
I'll review my results on tomorrow, I'm too tired now. --Vituzzu 00:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Unrelated Unrelated by CU, only Rcandre and Higor Douglas shere some datas. --Vituzzu 01:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

체크유절@ko.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
체크유절 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
체크유절2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
체크유우절 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Pesodara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Eesodara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Esodara2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Aesodara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Hesodara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Besodara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Fesodara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): I request that checking these users now. All 10 users edit patterns with 체크유절. These user had insisted that 정현규 has monopolized some admin, bureaucrat and member of Arbitration Committee. These links are clue. [12], [13], [14], [15] etc. RedMosQ 06:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
All users have been blocked, and apparently last 7 users are {{duck}}. Any other reasons to check? --Bencmq 06:27, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Besodara is first user and the other users are blocked because of name's resemblance. I will talk another reason. korean wikipedia has been trolled by similar 체크유절's pattern. the pattern is that specific users has insisted admins of korean wikipedia rule with an iron hand. We think that those users are one of the specific users. --RedMosQ 06:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed. This user uses very dynamic IP and open proxies. No other obvious socks found. Bencmq 07:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Esodara and Cesodara too, but you already got them. Bencmq 07:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Raimundo57br@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Raimundo57br (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Marcus Luccas (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): The user Quintinense is already known to have a lot of meatpuppets. After the blocking of Marcus Luccas, Raimundo57br began to participate in discussions, votings and on the pt:wp:esplanada - similar behavior of Quintinense and Marcus Luccas. Excuse the poor English, I do not speak the language. Web2365 00:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Lucianozn13@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Lucianozn133 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Lucianozn13 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Block evasion (see block request). Francisco 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Not done  It looks like a duck to me--Vituzzu 01:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Beijing NPOV vandal @zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Zhaotianyin (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
穆恩利伯蒂 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
刘大逼逼 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
张云沛 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
刘端勇 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Zhangyunpei2011 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
好汇丰 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Pku2007 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): This is gonna be a pretty difficult check... The 8 users above are the most recently used sock accounts of a Beijing-based vandal who has been censoring/vandalising articles on Chinese Wikipedia. Please help find out if there are more undiscovered sockpuppets and if possible, implement a range block (which is imo not likely). Besides the link above, I created another profile for this vandal on our wiki. Bencmq 07:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed
穆恩利伯蒂 can be Cuikun, 赵冬2007 and maybe 马鑫彬 and Dingshanlong
张云沛 and 刘端勇
Dingshanlong is Zhangyunpei2011
Also 大烧饼 is related and there are some possibilities that 赵天胤 is related too.
A rangeblock on 114.252.224.0/19 is applicable with a few side effects, the same with 114.250.112.0/20. 221.216.164.0/22 will also work but will affect another user which can be given with ip block exempt.
--Vituzzu 10:48, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, Cuikun is idle but all the rest appears to be him. I've blocked those ranges for 2 weeks. --Bencmq 11:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Ὥσπερ γὰρ ἀφ' ἑκατέρων@el.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Ὥσπερ γὰρ ἀφ' ἑκατέρων (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
ΕλληνικόΣυναξάρι (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
194.219.11.179 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Αλεχάντρο Υγριέκα (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Νεοσύστατος Πρίγκηψ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Lakis Patisia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Edit war in the article el:Σκεντέρμπεης. Long discussion about the article has been done in the discussion page el:Συζήτηση:Σκεντέρμπεης. After long discussion we agreed to revert the article in a non-POV version [17]. Then the edit-war started. Ggia 13:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

The users el:Χρήστης:Αλεχάντρο Υγριέκα, el:Χρήστης:Νεοσύστατος Πρίγκηψ and el:Χρήστης:Lakis Patisia there are known in the el.wikipedia community as puppets of user el:Χρήστης:Μυρμηγκάκι. For example the in a subpage of the user-page FocalPoint (admin @el.wikipedia) el:Χρήστης:FocalPoint/Δοκίμια/Χρήστες όπως τους θυμάμαι/Μυρμηγκοφωλιά there are various personas/puppets of this user el:Χρήστης:Μυρμηγκάκι has used the last months. Please investigate if el:Χρήστης:ΕλληνικόΣυναξάρι or el:Χρήστης:194.219.11.179 or el:Χρήστης:Ὥσπερ γὰρ ἀφ' ἑκατέρων are the same puppets with el:Χρήστης:Αλεχάντρο Υγριέκα, el:Χρήστης:Νεοσύστατος Πρίγκηψ and el:Χρήστης:Lakis Patisia (the last three are puppets of el:Χρήστης:Μυρμηγκάκι). Ggia 15:24, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Ὥσπερ γὰρ ἀφ' ἑκατέρων → Glascov5, Fleris, Μούτρο, ΓεύσηΕλληνικήΜπανάνα, Εύγεστος225, Tzinipa, ΗλεκτροφόραΚαλώδια and ΕλληνικόΣυναξάρι
Αλεχάντρο Υκριέγα → Αλεχάντρο Υγριέκα
Νεοσύστατος Πρίγκηψ → Kolitiri, Τρομαγμένος ξύπνησα, Kilitiri, Κάβουρας Ένας, NBvirily
Lakis Patisia → Παναγιώτα Ρόδη
These are raw results, there are many other accounts to check, I'll do it on tomorrow I hope. --Vituzzu 01:53, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
DoneFirst group:
Ὥσπερ γὰρ ἀφ' ἑκατέρων, ΕλληνικόΣυναξάρι, 194.219.11.179, Glascov5, Fleris, Μούτρο, ΓεύσηΕλληνικήΜπανάνα, Εύγεστος225, Tzinipa, ΗλεκτροφόραΚαλώδια and ΕλληνικόΣυναξάρι
Secondo group:
Αλεχάντρο Υκριέγα and Αλεχάντρο Υγριέκα are related to Νεοσύστατος Πρίγκηψ, Kolitiri, Τρομαγμένος ξύπνησα, Kilitiri, Κάβουρας Ένας, NBvirily, Ο χονδρός και ο λιγνός, Στάθης, Έλα κοντά μου, ZeeGee and the Ants, DannManTau, Αμβρόσιος.Κ, Εργοτέχνης, Branice, Vraxiolakias, Καρηκομοων, Lakis Patisia, Παναγιώτα Ρόδη, Κύκνος, NRK2011, Ματωμένα Δάκρυα, Movie star, Plinomos, Kartounos, Wehnekoeh, Guard'21, ΝΙΚΟΣ Χ, Koursaros tou oneirou, Volos F, Inconnu par ailleurs, Db 81, O Filikos Xenonas, ΘωρΒασιλ, Καρρορης, Η Τρελλή Ζαρτιέρα, Adieu mein kleiner gardeoffizier, Trongma, Μεγαλα προσόντα. Δεν χωράς πουθενά, Σωλήν, Ντίνος, Ανθούλης+Τάσος, Gian.Sfa, Μύριος, 20 χρόνια καραβάνα, Η Τρελή Ζαρτιέρα, Teokafa, Tasoula Dask, Μαρίνα, Το πράσινο άλογο του Κολοκοτρώνη, Μεγαλα προσόντα. Δεν χωράς πουθενά, Σωλήν, and maybe Drangons999, Side.by.side
NOTE: the second group could be divided into two subgroups.
Various groups indicates group of account directly linked, but, to me, *all* them are related with each other. Finally, I have no objection in a counter-check by another steward.--Vituzzu 15:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your check, in el.wikipedia we have started a discussion about these two groups. Ggia 14:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Amstaff@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Amstaff (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Renatomfroes (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Edit the same way ([18], [19]) probably duck. Thank you.Érico13 22:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Not done. Please don't submit this kind of requests when there's no real need of technical evidence to justify a block. Both users were/are already blocked (1 - 2). Thank you. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 23:40, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes they were, but for different reasons, the user Renatomfroes was not blocked by use of multiple accounts, but by vandalism, and he is no longer locked.Érico13 00:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Elias Vital Da Silva Júnior@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
Elias Vital Da Silva Júnior (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Lucassliot (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These users have the same standard of edits. See deleted edits of BellicPatito. Both are blocked. Francisco 15:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 Declined because Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 15:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Lan-gou-qu-si @zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Lan-gou-qu-si (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
王泽一 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
玻璃人 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
龙城游魂 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
钟馗捉鬼 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): see Steward requests/Checkuser/2012-01#天外使者@zh.wikipedia，these seems to be the new sockets of this group aiming at the same articles. But some of them's edits are just like anti-vandalism (I hope it is not a cheat). So I ask you to check carefully. Thank you. Zhxy 519 11:15, 29 January 2012 (UTC)



Hello. I did not check 王泽一 as I don't see where he could be related to others. Lan-gou-qu-si and 龙城游魂 may use multiple accounts but we can be sure that no one is in the list you wrote above.

The following users are  Confirmed with the confirmed group on the previous request :

  • 玻璃人
  • 韦荣光
  • 汉牯佬1
  • 钟馗捉鬼
  • Moungder
  • Kangtyu
  • 张胜利
  • Bludkert
  • Jygtfrh7
  • 捉游鬼
  • 石新华

Quentinv57 (talk) 12:52, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. As the former CU result (above) showed, they are not only one IP group. So I'm not surpised with your result. --Zhxy 519 14:00, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Miss apple (manzana)@es.wikinews

Status:    Done
List of users
Miss apple (manzana) (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
201.220.233.210 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Carliitaeliza (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
No a la SOPA, (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Patrón de ediciones muy similar. Según un rastreo de IP pude comprobar que los tres últimos viven en la misma zona de Chile. La usuaria Carliitaeliza fue bloqueada en es.wikinews, es.wikipedia y en.wikipedia por diversos motivos entre ellos revelar información personal. MadriCR 20:49, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Question Question: The account "No a la SOPA" doesn't exist. Are you sure you would like a check for that account? Trijnstel 20:59 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes, Confirmation link --MadriCR 21:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Ehm, please click on the link you gave me and you'll read in red: "User account "No a la SOPA" is not registered." Trijnstel 21:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, This is --MadriCR 21:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
(after ec) Ah, I heard from Savh on IRC that you meant No a la SOPA, (with a comma). Trijnstel 21:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Miss apple (manzana), Carliitaeliza and No a la SOPA, are  Confirmed. No comment with regard to the IP address. Trijnstel 21:20, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Comment Comment I globally locked all three accounts. Trijnstel 21:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

도야쿠@ko.wikipedia / 모두의사전@ko.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
도야쿠 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Karammarak (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
중딩소년 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
리순신 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
모두의사전 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
NEARMISS (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
경라고속철도 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): I will give you 2 puppet groups. Parts of one group are 도야쿠, Kramamarak, 중딩소년, 리순신 and other obvious socks. and Parts of another group are 모두의 사전, NEARMISS, 경라고속철도. one group has claimed that "another group" is puppet group of ko:user:Unypoly who has maked many socks puppet. [20], [21] and it has blamed some users.[22], [23]. We think that its clame is not completely wrong. So we request checking another group too. and we will appreciate if you check any other puppet about those groups. RedMosQ 13:52, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
  1. 도야쿠 is 파란모기
  2. 윤성현동생 is Karammarak
  3. 중딩소년 is 박틱스짱또7, 카라멜 마끼아또를 좋아하는 의무경찰, 츄군덕스럽게, 석장리
  4. 리순신 is NEARMISS, 만종역, NEREVES and maybe Ryu Si-won and Ryu Shi-won, 모두의사전, S222, 직인날인, 관찰사 and maybe Lnx
Group 3 and 4 are related while the other two are slighty different.
--Vituzzu 19:23, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Do you mind if I request more checking? 경라철도 who we think 경라고속철도's duck request at ko:w:위키백과:사용자 관리 요청 recently. He insisted that blocking of 경라고속철도 must be cleared because 경라고속철도 not related NEARMISS in "도야쿠@ko.wikipedia / 모두의사전@ko.wikipedia" checking. But we think 경라고속철도, 경라철도 is related with NEARMISS or many socks puppet. So we request checking about 경라철도, 경라고속철도 and many related puppet of 2 users. --RedMosQ 07:02, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
It's quite hard to me to read your language (that's the main reason it took me so much time to fulfil your request), so can you please tell more precisely which other checks do you need? --Vituzzu 19:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
OK. I give you more explanation. At 18 Jan 2012, 경라철도 requested that 경라고속철도 must be cleared from his blocked. [24] Because 경라고속철도 was not detected in that checking, "도야쿠@ko.wikipedia / 모두의사전@ko.wikipedia". but we believe strongly that 경라고속철도 is NEARMISS and Unypoly who make many puppets and We think that 경라철도 is 경라고속철도's duck too. So we request checking for any other puppets of 경라철도 and 경라고속철도. lastly, I give you list that you should check.
  • Any likely puppets which 3 users have.
    • 경라고속철도
    • 경라선
    • 경라철도

--RedMosQ 03:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

These three accounts are  Confirmed, and also 코레1 but they are *not* directly related to the other puppets listed. There's some slight similarity but it's not enough to say confirmed by CU. Btw checkuser is just an easily circumventable tool, so the "human recognition of puppets" should take precedence over it. --Vituzzu 11:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser/2012-01&oldid=26753840"