Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser/2012-06

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests | Checkuser
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Makecat in topic Requests

Requests

Latest comment: 12 years ago88 comments28 people in discussion

Plasticj@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Plasticj (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Akiotour (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Leonlee97 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Edits only concentrated on zh:項明生. Suspicious accounts of self-promotion.--Zhxy 519 (talk) 11:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
As I'm not so experienced, from a technical point of view it seems Likely Likely. --Luckas msg 14:16, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

SH9002@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
SH9002 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Tfcolin (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): User:SH9002 is blocked for personal attack and Tfcolin is suspicious for praising SH9002 to disturb the discussion.--Zhxy 519 (talk) 11:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
From a technical point of view they are Unrelated Unrelated. --Luckas msg 14:16, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Soviétique@frwiktionary

Status:    Done
List of users
Franck Reagan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Igor' Sorokin (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Vandalising a lot of similar pages, it was already noticed a year ago with user Soviétique. Thanks. Quentinv57 (talk) 07:19, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed to be the same IP and UA. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Clarify, both the listed users are at same IP and same UA. No data available for comparison. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:47, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Chinese blogpost spammers at mediawiki.org

Status:    Done

I've blocked these accounts on mediawiki.org and there are probably more of those. Please consider investigating them, checking for sleepers and blocking its underlying IP(s) either locally or globally for a while. Thanks, Mathonius (talk) 12:57, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Doing... -- Quentinv57 (talk) 13:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Done. I removed the CheckUser rights on Quentin here as I think he was done. He blocked all confirmed socks locally and locked them too. Trijnsteltalk 21:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Mathonius (talk) 05:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Teetrinker and Teeinfos

Status:    Done

These accounts were all created within the last few days and I'm afraid they might be 'sleeping' spambots. Please consider investigating if they're related. Mathonius (talk) 05:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

I did not check them all, but from what I checked I did not see any known spambot patterns. I think that the best to do here is to keep an eye on them, but I really doubt that they are spam-only accounts. Regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 06:46, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

南师大葛军老师@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
南师大葛军老师 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
葛军真昏蛋 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
74.221.212.249 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): The three users appeared one after another, only aiming to add attacking content to zh:葛军. They were all blocked by local sysops now. Please check whether they are related. Makecat (talk) 07:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
It looks like our old friend zh:WP:LHLS from his edits. -Mys_721tx(talk) 07:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Analyzing. I'm working in this request. —Marco Aurelio (audiencia) 08:42, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Results

  •  Confirmed
    • 南师大葛军老师
    • Bencum
    • 超光速是真理
    • Guidetruly
  • Possible Possible (tending to likely)
    • 葛军真昏蛋
  • I can't speak in regards to the IP address. If behaves in a prohibited way, block it.

—Marco Aurelio (audiencia) 09:10, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Seanloon

Status:    Done

This non-sul account is being used to spam cross-wiki. I've blocked all profiles registered on June 6th, because they've been used to spam or tried to do so. I wonder if the following are related as well:

Thanks in advance, Mathonius (talk) 09:53, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Likely Likely I checked tiWP, meta and enWV and they all locate to the same broad ISP though across disparate IP ranges, and other circumstantial evidence would call this highly likely.  It looks like a duck to me — billinghurst sDrewth 12:07, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! I've blocked it on meta, commons and en.v; I will request blocks on en.n and simple.wp. Mathonius (talk) 12:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Saberzadmirza@glk.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Saberzadmirza (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Giltam (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Atefi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): The users was created in few days ago and they vote in first edits in the same admin request, 1, 2, 3.

Thanks--AliReza (talk) 12:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Unrelated Unrelated — billinghurst sDrewth 12:15, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Also with AminSanei or Sicapsi? they vote in that request.--AliReza (talk) 12:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Unrelated Unrelated A little concerned about the approach here, you have requested of us to CU a local administrator. Some mindfulness should be used. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, no problem--AliReza (talk) 12:54, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Pinkdevil98@ca.wikibooks

Status:    Done
List of users
Blackdevil97 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Pinkdevil98 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Repeated creating pages not covered by project scope: possible abusing multiple accounts. Frigotoni ...i'm here; 12:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed — billinghurst sDrewth 12:41, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Comment Comment: I've blocked both accounts locally and requested a lock for Pinkdevil98 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser). Mathonius (talk) 12:48, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

X@frwiktionary

Status:    Done
List of users
X (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
IJKL (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): This user is suspected of evading his 1 week block.

Thanks by advance. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 08:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Likely Likely Whole spread of IP data, nothing specific in that /16 to say yes, though shares other data to indicate there is a likelihood that there is a match, and the geolocation could align. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:38, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed checked further xwiki. Matching on IP ranges, and UA. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks ! -- Quentinv57 (talk) 09:50, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Suspected spambots (...(.)hare....)

Status:    Done

All of these accounts have been created recently. I'm afraid they might be spambots. Please investigate them and see if they're related. Thanks, Mathonius (talk) 15:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

I did not found any known spambot pattern. My advice would be the same that on your last request : it may be a new bot, so please keep an eye on them. But we don't have enough evidence to lock at this stage. Regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 16:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Civilaut@fa.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Civilaut (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Hagh91 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): They have the same field of interest and participating in edit warring,[2][3][4][5] suspected of trying to avoid 3RR and creating an illusion of support. -- Dalba(talk) 23 Khordad 1391/ 17:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed. No more sockpuppets found. Trijnsteltalk 20:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

جنگولک@fa.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
جنگولک (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
علی رجبی (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): User جنگولک is taking part in the same disscussion as علی رجبی, based on the discussions in here. In his first edit, commented in Wikipedia:Village pump(he knows wikipedia users.Kazemita1 (talk) 21:48, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Inconclusive Inconclusive/Unlikely Unlikely Whilst both users access the internet through the same ISP, that is not surprising given how the internet is controlled in that area of the world. Their IPs are not necessarily related. Other technical evidence indicates that they are not necessarily the same person, although it is not impossible. Lastly علی رجبی edited last on April 16. -- Avi (talk) 17:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Crazy_daisuke@zhwikip

Status:    Not done
List of users
Crazy daisuke (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
124.244.208.109 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): the user is suspected of using IP puppet to get rid of 3RR rule at zh:無綫電視週年誌慶活動--Kegns 10:29, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Comment. This check will end directly linking an IP address with a registered user. Privacy policy does not normaly allow us to make such direct associations. If the IP is behaving in a prohibited way I suggest to block it or use other measures like (semi)protection on those articles under edit war. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio (audiencia) 10:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Per Marco. -- Avi (talk) 17:38, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

I guess this is then a «not done» instead of a «done» above, right? :-) —Marco Aurelio (audiencia) 19:07, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

It doesn't matter, does it? Also, speaking generally, just because we try to protect the privacy of wikimedians, even vandals, does not mean to say that we do not try and protect the projects from those vandals 8-) . -- Avi (talk) 22:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Changed back to a "not done" as "closed" refers to "in progress" and therefore the request won't be archived by the bot. Trijnsteltalk 22:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Jytrkbags225 and Fryhbeats207@mediawiki.org

Status:    Done

I'm expecting some spam for Dr. Dre beats and Chanel handbags (or so) from these pattern accounts. Please consider investigating them. Mathonius (talk) 08:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

2x spambots, locked, and a local range block placed locally based on exploration, further data analysis also continuing — billinghurst sDrewth 14:23, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Adgfrtj5k@mediawiki.org

Status:    Done

Please consider checking this Chinese blogpost spammer (see filter log). Thanks, Mathonius (talk) 08:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Typical spambot, locked. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Lujali@fa.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Lujali (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
زاپاس بدخیم (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Stetar (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
69.163.34.51 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Lujali seems to be another sock puppet of ترول بدخیم. The user requested me (at first by IP and later created a user account) to open 5.34.208.0/20 range, which was refused and now he is showing a semi-troll behavior. Is it possible for you to confirm that he is/is not the same user? Thanks. -- Dalba(talk) 27 Khordad 1391/ 19:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Also Bijangerd. He edits in Pan Turkism page like Stetar--AliReza (talk) 22:28, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Reviewing this. — MA (audiencia) 12:32, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
I've got some results which I'm not too sure about and have asked for review. — MA (audiencia) 13:25, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Inconclusive Inconclusive Not the previous behaviour for this user, and looking at the range of the edits, it is a very busy space for editors (10s of users), and potentially a VPN access. The stewards will probably have a look at the editing IP range to see what other editing is taking place, however, at this stage I cannot recommend that we take further immediate action. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:13, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Exactly my thoughts, tho I wanted to be sure. Thanks Billinghurst for your help. Closing this as "done". — MA (audiencia) 14:26, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Việt Nam Dân Chủ Tiến Bộ Đảng@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of users
影武者 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Việt Nam Dân Chủ Tiến Bộ Đảng (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): A block is also being sought in that particular local version of Wikipedia, per and based upon the results found and the decisions made at w:en:Wikipedia:SPI#Nipponese_Dog_Calvero. — 99801155KC9TV (talk) 00:11, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Not done The first account is stale: it has not edited for more than 3 months. Ruslik (talk) 07:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Motormovie@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Motormovie (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
李煌老师 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
李火皇老师 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
乌拉跨黑 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Abusement, trolling. Actually there are so many puppet groups [6][7][8]for this guy that it is hard for me to choose a main puppet for him.--Zhxy 519 (talk) 16:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Unrelated Unrelated Motormovie appears unrelated to any of the other users listed. -- Avi (talk) 16:41, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Is that means other three accounts are related?－Justincheng12345 (talk) 04:39, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
The other 3 were proven to be socks long ago. Bencmq (talk) 04:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Rlaalfo759@ko.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Rlaalfo759 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Kyounhee74 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
강하은천적 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
강주연짱 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): We agree this request and, We Must check this request. please check w:ko:위키백과:다중 계정 검사 요청#사용자:Rlaalfo759--DangSunM (talk) 09:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Additional explanation: Hello. I'm an admin of Ko.wp and let me explain about this case. 4 targeted users repeatedly added unreferenced contents(possibly Original research) on ko:난다 난다 니얀다(Nanda Nanda Niyanda), and did not tried adding reliable source. ko:User:Djm03178 had notified to them, but their behavior were unchanged - actually they repeated same claim based on unreliable, original source - and they insulted other user reverting their edit. Maybe one of them attacked Djm03178 outside of wikipedia. Two of them(plus one another related account ko:사용자:Rkdwndus759) were blocked 6 months due to personal attack to reverter. --Mintz0223 (talk) 10:15, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
These five usernames all seem to have a relationship.
  • 강하은천적
  • Rkdwndus759
  • Rlaalfo759
  • 강주연짱
  • Kyounhee74
 Confirmed — billinghurst sDrewth 13:10, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

氪跨拉乌@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
氪跨拉乌 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
南师大葛军老师 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
葛军真昏蛋 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
李煌老师 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): see zh:WP:VIP, zh:User_talk:Symplectopedia, zh:WP:LHLS--2011wp (talk) 09:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

There are more than one group which contain  Confirmed sockpuppets with each other, and, in my judgment, it is Likely Likely that all groups are related:

-- Avi (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Perispliced6@mediawikiwiki

Status:    Done
List of users
Perispliced6 ([[
Special:Contributions/Perispliced6|contr]] · [[
Special:DeletedContributions/Perispliced6|deleted]] · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Yet more cross-wiki sockpuppetry by Animelover3 (see User:Kokino and User:Sockeater). No local CheckUsers.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed with Sockeater. Kokino does not have an account in MediaWiki. — T. 05:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
And since Sockeater=Kokino=Animelover3 by previous CU, we have a sock of Animelover3.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Crosswiki spambots

Status:    Done

These accounts spammed yesterday and today. I've blocked all of them locally. They are - judging by their pattern usernames and the similar way they spam - probably related. Please check if a global IP block is possible/useful. Mathonius (talk) 18:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Iqszmwext (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser) on en.wikisource might also be related, but that wiki has local CU's. Mathonius (talk) 19:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

All done. Except for Iqszmwext that was only locked, all of them were locked and checked . Thank you for reporting.‴ Teles«msg» 21:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Maxdik@zhwiki

Status:    Done
List of users
Maxdik (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Specialgood (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
  • CU log
  • Discussion: Received the user's email appeal to review the block at Unblock-zh
Reason(s): Maxdik with https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=回到三國&diff=prev&oldid=19402337 is blocked as a suspected sockpuppet of Specialgood with https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=回到三國&diff=prev&oldid=19402337 , but other than somewhat similar edit pattern, I am not fully sure if the suspicion is truly justified, so I hereby request any disinterested steward to review. Thanks.Jusjih (talk) 12:38, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
After a thorough check I can confirm both users are technically Unrelated Unrelated. You might wish to unblock user Maxdik. Trijnsteltalk 12:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your answer. I have unblocked Maxdik. I am going to caution my fellow Chinese Wikipedia administrators that requesting checkuser here is better than unilateral presumption.--Jusjih (talk) 13:29, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Captaincollect1970@mediawikiwiki

Status:    Done
List of users
Captaincollect1970 ([[
Special:Contributions/Captaincollect1970|contr]] · [[
Special:DeletedContributions/Captaincollect1970|deleted]] · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
BrandonSkyPimenta ([[
Special:Contributions/BrandonSkyPimenta|contr]] · [[
Special:DeletedContributions/BrandonSkyPimenta|deleted]] · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
BrandonSkyPim ([[
Special:Contributions/BrandonSkyPim|contr]] · [[
Special:DeletedContributions/BrandonSkyPim|deleted]] · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
BrandonSkyHTFFan04 ([[
Special:Contributions/BrandonSkyHTFFan04|contr]] · [[
Special:DeletedContributions/BrandonSkyHTFFan04|deleted]] · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
BrandonSkyPimentaABC ([[
Special:Contributions/BrandonSkyPimentaABC|contr]] · [[
Special:DeletedContributions/BrandonSkyPimentaABC|deleted]] · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
HTFFanBrandon04 ([[
Special:Contributions/HTFFanBrandon04|contr]] · [[
Special:DeletedContributions/HTFFanBrandon04|deleted]] · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
FrequentIntenseMatureSuggestiveThemes ([[
Special:Contributions/FrequentIntenseMatureSuggestiveThemes|contr]] · [[
Special:DeletedContributions/FrequentIntenseMatureSuggestiveThemes|deleted]] · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Captaincollect1970 is suspected to be a sockpuppet of BrandonSkyPimenta, whose socks are listed after him here in rough order of increasing age. Trijnstel had blacklisted Captaincollect1970 as a suspected sock of ItsMeBrandonSky@commonswiki after an examination of his edits to Commons. This request comes after this, which highly increases the suspicion, as the behavorial connection is increasingly becoming apparent. On this wiki, Trijnstel ran a check a few days ago and it was inconclusive, but now I think there may be a connection, especially if Captaincollect1970 is checked with all of the other accounts.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

D&S@pt.wiktionary

Status:    Done
List of users
Leonardo Pereira Araújo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
DePortugal (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Billinghurst Carramel (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Djuzé (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): I've blocked today Leonardo Pereira Araújo (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser), who behaved like the banned user D&S (see this request for more information), and I'd like to make sure it's really him and know if there are more accounts, IP ranges or open proxies involved. I've listed the last accounts used by the vandal. Thanks in advance. Defender (talk) 16:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
The first account is Unrelated Unrelated to other three accounts. Ruslik (talk) 18:36, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

분당선정자역@ko.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
분당선정자역 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
티파니가티파니 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
분당선엠 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
노란분당선 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
분당선죽전역 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
부산김해갱전철 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
이상해 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
분당선66 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): This users without move the My korean wikipedia user page and talk page use multy account so I must check this user and block the IP adress. please check the localDangSunM (talk) 08:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Results as follows:

  •  Confirmed group I
    • 분당선엠
    • 분당선죽전역
    • 노란분당선
    • 티파니가티파니
    • 분당선정자역
    • Ykhvong
    • 책만읽는달팽
    • 둥둥둥북을울려라
    • 위키백과의 비리를 밝혀내는 특검
  • Likely Likely group I
    • 도시의가치
    • YKHWWONG
    • 분당선죽전역
    • 황제매니아
    • 왕로리
    • 폴리를 없애자
  • Possible Possible group I
    • 최재윤님 (not blocked; please check contribs. before taking any action)
  • Likely Likely group II
    • 분당선66
    • 분당선6
    • 이상해
    • 부산김해갱전철
    • 캉씨매니아
    • 노란분당선
    • 리센슝
    • 항제숙종
    • 빨갱이퇴치
    • 분당선정자역
  • It is Likely Likely that Group I and Group II accounts are related.

Apologies if there's any duplicate in the list.

— MA (audiencia) 11:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Amir a57@fa.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
Amir a57 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Wildfire (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Urmuyurdum (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Urment (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These users have nearly the same edits in the same page (Urmia).[9][10][11][12] -- Dalba(talk) 8 Tir 1391/ 15:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
All technically Unrelated Unrelated. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:20, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Vinita8715@incubator

Status:    Done

This spambot is obviously related to Reyes8671 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) at en.wikibooks. Please investigate it and block its underlying IP if possible. Thanks, Mathonius (talk) 03:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Completed Completed and I informed the other checkusers. Thanks for informing us! Trijnsteltalk 16:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

特殊性關係@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of users
特殊性關係 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
James Alfred Ding (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
LDY1977 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Michael Obama Chen (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Peter Jason Chen (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Alfred Jason Chen (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
惡棍 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
能登麻美子是否還是處女？馮光遠想知道！ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
我們一家都是白目 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
莫哲崇 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): These users are recently blocked sockpuppets of a long-term abuser. Please confirm and block all ip addresses he used for several months, because he often uses proxies to edit. Thanks.Makecat (talk) 12:42, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Status:    Done
List of users
Thái Vũ Kiệt (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): See above. --Makecat (talk) 13:20, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 Confirmed.
Please also add to your list to block 沈榮光 (talk · contribs) Egbert Mei (talk · contribs), 宮本高正 (talk · contribs), Egbert Kenneth Yang (talk · contribs), Leearwen (talk · contribs), Yoshimura Michael Sanada (talk · contribs).
Maybes 林四維 (talk · contribs), Iamdog43 (talk · contribs), 游文茜 (talk · contribs).
There are other accounts earlier that may or may not be related that I have not listed. They are busy ranges. To note that your two /16 range blocks also will impede other users, which I assume you will know. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:13, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. Range blocks were performed by other sysops, I will tell him. --Makecat (talk) 14:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser/2012-06&oldid=24907205"