User talk:VLodge2

September 2024

Please do not remove deletion requests from articles, as you did to "Guillaume bresso". If you think the article should be kept, you can comment on the discussion page, Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Guillaume bresso. If the result of the discussion is to keep the article, the closing administrator will remove the deletion request. Thank you. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 20:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, This article complies with Wikipedia's rules on biographies of living persons.. Also, this article is neutral, with reliable sources, make no original claims, and be notable enough for an encyclopaedia.

I will add that I have just sent an email to these various researchers with whom your contributor seems to be in dispute.

On the other hand, online defamation which consists of making insulting or slanderous remarks against a person is not tolerable. Even if a screenshot does not constitute the ultimate proof to establish the reality of the facts alleged in defamation matters, it can be useful for case law. I do not know how these personalities will react to these hateful remarks. Really, I have no idea. However, they are academics, university authors, researchers and teacher-researchers. And above all, how will their affiliated university react? VLodge2 (talk) 21:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove the RFD template from the page as long as the discussion is going on. Continuing to do so is disruptive and you may be blocked from editing. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 21:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you decided to continue being disruptive by removing the template, you have been blocked from editing the page Guillaume bresso. Discuss about the deletion in the discussion page. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 21:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to delete this page, do it. But do not leave defamatory remarks appearing in the template. VLodge2 (talk) 21:50, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

defamation: The act of injuring another person's reputation by any slanderous communication, written or oral; the wrong of maliciously injuring the good name of another. There are no defamatory remarks in the deletion message. Pointing out that a person does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for academics does not injure their reputation, neither does the the nominator's statement that the subject does not appear in databases, or that a part of the article is being given undue weight. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 21:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 claim about the Maya maize god also seems to be a violation of UNDUE here. Chenzw Talk 17:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC) is a defamatory remarks. I sent these remarks to the Dr. Bresso for information. He replied to me that for him, this remark is a very important message. For my part, I decline all responsibility. VLodge2 (talk) 22:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UNDUE is a Wikipedia guideline on how to write articles. It states that in an article, viewpoints and opinions must be represented proportionally to their significance or prominence. What Chenzw means is that the article about the subject places undue emphasis about the subject's research about the Maya maize god. It is not defamatory to say that the article is places undue emphasis on a certain part of the subject's research. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fully support Fehufanga's comments and actions in regards this action. fr33k man 22:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]