Jump to content

-ism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
I removed an incorrect claim ('-ism' does not mean "taking side with" or "imitation" of, and this claim is not supported by the reference), corrected an incorrect reference (the OED reference for the noun 'ism' was cited instead of the one for the suffix), and used the OED definition of the suffix to provide a better explanation.
m Disambiguating links to Spiritualism (link changed to Spiritualism (movement)) using DisamAssist.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{wiktionary|lang=en}}
{{wiktionary|lang=en}}
{{italic title}}
{{italic title}}
'''''-ism''''' ({{IPAc-en|-|ˌ|ɪ|z|əm}}) is a [[suffix]] in many [[English grammar|English word]]s, originally derived from the [[Ancient Greek]] suffix {{wikt-lang|grc|-ισμός}} (''{{grc-transl|-ισμός}}''), and reached [[English language|English]] through the [[Latin]] {{Lang|la|-ismus}}, and the [[French language|French]] {{Lang|fr| -isme}}.<ref name=suffix>{{cite encyclopedia |year= 2014 | title= -ism | encyclopedia= Oxford English Dictionary online | publisher= Oxford University Press | location= Oxford |url= http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/100006}} {{subscription required}}</ref> It is used to create abstract nouns of action, state, condition, or doctrine, and is often used to describe [[philosophy|philosophies]], [[theories]], [[religion]]s, [[social movement]]s, [[artistic movements]], [[Lifestyle (social sciences)|lifestyles]]<ref>Such as [[hedonism]] or [[consumerism]]</ref> [[behavior]]s, [[science|scientific phenomena]] <ref>Such as [[magnetism]]</ref>, or [[medicine|medical conditions]] <ref>Such as an [[embolism]], [[dwarfism]], or [[priapism]]</ref>.<ref name=noun>{{cite encyclopedia | year= 2023 | title= ism suffix | encyclopedia= Oxford English Dictionary online |publisher= Oxford University Press | location= Oxford | url= https://www.oed.com/dictionary/ism_suffix| url-access= <!--WP:URLACCESS--> }} {{subscription required}}</ref>
'''''-ism''''' ({{IPAc-en|-|ˌ|ɪ|z|əm}}) is a [[suffix]] in many [[English grammar|English word]]s, originally derived from the [[Ancient Greek]] suffix {{wikt-lang|grc|-ισμός}} (''{{grc-transl|-ισμός}}''), and reached [[English language|English]] through the [[Latin]] {{Lang|la|-ismus}}, and the [[French language|French]] {{Lang|fr| -isme}}.<ref name=suffix>{{cite encyclopedia |year= 2014 | title= -ism | encyclopedia= Oxford English Dictionary online | publisher= Oxford University Press | location= Oxford |url= http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/100006}} {{subscription required}}</ref> It is used to create abstract nouns of action, state, condition, or doctrine, and is often used to describe [[philosophy|philosophies]], [[theories]], [[religion]]s, [[social movement]]s, [[artistic movements]], [[Lifestyle (social sciences)|lifestyles]],<ref>Such as [[hedonism]] or [[consumerism]]</ref> [[behavior]]s, [[science|scientific phenomena]],<ref>Such as [[magnetism]]</ref> or [[medicine|medical conditions]].<ref>Such as an [[embolism]], [[dwarfism]], or [[priapism]]</ref><ref name=noun>{{cite encyclopedia | year= 2023 | title= ism suffix | encyclopedia= Oxford English Dictionary online |publisher= Oxford University Press | location= Oxford | url= https://www.oed.com/dictionary/ism_suffix| url-access= <!--WP:URLACCESS--> }} {{subscription required}}</ref>


The concept of an -ism may resemble that of a [[grand narrative]].<ref>{{cite book|last1= Prettejohn|first1= Elizabeth|author-link1=Elizabeth Prettejohn|chapter=The Discovery of Greek Sculpture|title=The Modernity of Ancient Sculpture: Greek Sculpture and Modern Art from Winckelmann to Picasso|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eZtCo4FavAkC |series= New Directions in Classics Series|date= 15 September 2012 |volume= 2|location= London|publisher= I.B.Tauris |publication-date= 2012|page= 61|isbn= 9781848859036|quote= [...] another grand narrative, no less compelling than the familiar succession of 'isms' [...]}}</ref>
The concept of an -ism may resemble that of a [[grand narrative]].<ref>{{cite book|last1= Prettejohn|first1= Elizabeth|author-link1=Elizabeth Prettejohn|chapter=The Discovery of Greek Sculpture|title=The Modernity of Ancient Sculpture: Greek Sculpture and Modern Art from Winckelmann to Picasso|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eZtCo4FavAkC |series= New Directions in Classics Series|date= 15 September 2012 |volume= 2|location= London|publisher= I.B.Tauris |publication-date= 2012|page= 61|isbn= 9781848859036|quote= [...] another grand narrative, no less compelling than the familiar succession of 'isms' [...]}}</ref>
Line 25: Line 25:


== History ==
== History ==
The first recorded usage of the suffix ''ism'' as a separate word in its own right was in 1680. By the nineteenth century it was being used by [[Thomas Carlyle]] to signify a pre-packaged [[ideology]]. It was later used in this sense by such writers as [[Julian Huxley]] and [[George Bernard Shaw]]. In the United States of the mid-nineteenth century, the phrase "the isms" was used as a collective derogatory term to lump together the radical social reform movements of the day (such as [[abolitionism|slavery abolitionism]], [[feminism]], [[prohibitionism|alcohol prohibitionism]], [[Fourierism]], [[pacifism]], Technoism, early [[socialism]], etc.) and various spiritual or religious movements considered non-mainstream by the standards of the time (such as [[transcendentalism]], [[spiritualism]] or "spirit rapping", [[Mormonism]], the [[Oneida Society|Oneida]] movement often accused of "free love", etc.). Southerners often prided themselves on the American South being free from all of these pernicious "Isms" (except for alcohol temperance campaigning, which was compatible with a traditional Protestant focus on individual morality). So on September 5 and 9, 1856, the ''Examiner'' newspaper of [[Richmond, Virginia]], ran editorials on "Our Enemies, the Isms and their Purposes", while in 1858 [[William Gannaway Brownlow|Parson Brownlow]] called for a "Missionary Society of the South, for the Conversion of the Freedom Shriekers, Spiritualists, Free-lovers, Fourierites, and [[atheism|Infidel]] Reformers of the North" (see ''The Freedom-of-thought Struggle in the Old South'' by [[Clement Eaton]]). In the present day, it appears in the title of a standard survey of political thought, ''Today's Isms'' by William Ebenstein, first published in the 1950s, and now in its 11th edition.
The first recorded usage of the suffix ''ism'' as a separate word in its own right was in 1680. By the nineteenth century it was being used by [[Thomas Carlyle]] to signify a pre-packaged [[ideology]]. It was later used in this sense by such writers as [[Julian Huxley]] and [[George Bernard Shaw]]. In the United States of the mid-nineteenth century, the phrase "the isms" was used as a collective derogatory term to lump together the radical social reform movements of the day (such as [[abolitionism|slavery abolitionism]], [[feminism]], [[prohibitionism|alcohol prohibitionism]], [[Fourierism]], [[pacifism]], Technoism, early [[socialism]], etc.) and various spiritual or religious movements considered non-mainstream by the standards of the time (such as [[transcendentalism]], [[Spiritualism (movement)|spiritualism]], [[Mormonism]] etc.). Southerners often prided themselves on the American South being free from all of these pernicious "Isms" (except for alcohol temperance campaigning, which was compatible with a traditional Protestant focus on individual morality). So on September 5 and 9, 1856, the ''Examiner'' newspaper of [[Richmond, Virginia]], ran editorials on "Our Enemies, the Isms and their Purposes", while in 1858 [[William Gannaway Brownlow|Parson Brownlow]] called for a "Missionary Society of the South, for the Conversion of the Freedom Shriekers, Spiritualists, Free-lovers, Fourierites, and [[atheism|Infidel]] Reformers of the North" (see ''The Freedom-of-thought Struggle in the Old South'' by [[Clement Eaton]]). In the present day, it appears in the title of a standard survey of political thought, ''Today's Isms'' by William Ebenstein, first published in the 1950s, and now in its 11th edition.


In 2004, the ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'' added two new draft definitions of -isms to reference their relationship to words that convey injustice:<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094017|doi-access=free|title=Measures of Racism, Sexism, Heterosexism, and Gender Binarism for Health Equity Research: From Structural Injustice to Embodied Harm{{snd}}An Ecosocial Analysis|year=2020|last1=Krieger|first1=Nancy|journal=Annual Review of Public Health|volume=41|pages=37–62|pmid=31765272}}</ref>
In 2004, the ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'' added two new draft definitions of -isms to reference their relationship to words that convey injustice:<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094017|doi-access=free|title=Measures of Racism, Sexism, Heterosexism, and Gender Binarism for Health Equity Research: From Structural Injustice to Embodied Harm{{snd}}An Ecosocial Analysis|year=2020|last1=Krieger|first1=Nancy|journal=Annual Review of Public Health|volume=41|pages=37–62|pmid=31765272}}</ref>

Latest revision as of 01:54, 26 March 2024

-ism (/-ˌɪzəm/) is a suffix in many English words, originally derived from the Ancient Greek suffix -ισμός (-ismós), and reached English through the Latin -ismus, and the French -isme.[1] It is used to create abstract nouns of action, state, condition, or doctrine, and is often used to describe philosophies, theories, religions, social movements, artistic movements, lifestyles,[2] behaviors, scientific phenomena,[3] or medical conditions.[4][5]

The concept of an -ism may resemble that of a grand narrative.[6]

Skeptics of any given -isms can quote the dictum attributed to Eisenhower: "All -isms are wasms".[7]

History

[edit]

The first recorded usage of the suffix ism as a separate word in its own right was in 1680. By the nineteenth century it was being used by Thomas Carlyle to signify a pre-packaged ideology. It was later used in this sense by such writers as Julian Huxley and George Bernard Shaw. In the United States of the mid-nineteenth century, the phrase "the isms" was used as a collective derogatory term to lump together the radical social reform movements of the day (such as slavery abolitionism, feminism, alcohol prohibitionism, Fourierism, pacifism, Technoism, early socialism, etc.) and various spiritual or religious movements considered non-mainstream by the standards of the time (such as transcendentalism, spiritualism, Mormonism etc.). Southerners often prided themselves on the American South being free from all of these pernicious "Isms" (except for alcohol temperance campaigning, which was compatible with a traditional Protestant focus on individual morality). So on September 5 and 9, 1856, the Examiner newspaper of Richmond, Virginia, ran editorials on "Our Enemies, the Isms and their Purposes", while in 1858 Parson Brownlow called for a "Missionary Society of the South, for the Conversion of the Freedom Shriekers, Spiritualists, Free-lovers, Fourierites, and Infidel Reformers of the North" (see The Freedom-of-thought Struggle in the Old South by Clement Eaton). In the present day, it appears in the title of a standard survey of political thought, Today's Isms by William Ebenstein, first published in the 1950s, and now in its 11th edition.

In 2004, the Oxford English Dictionary added two new draft definitions of -isms to reference their relationship to words that convey injustice:[8]

In December 2015, Merriam-Webster Dictionary declared -ism to be the Word of the Year.[9]

See also

[edit]

For examples of the use of -ism as a suffix:

Notes and references

[edit]
  1. ^ "-ism". Oxford English Dictionary online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014. (subscription required)
  2. ^ Such as hedonism or consumerism
  3. ^ Such as magnetism
  4. ^ Such as an embolism, dwarfism, or priapism
  5. ^ "ism suffix". Oxford English Dictionary online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2023. (subscription required)
  6. ^ Prettejohn, Elizabeth (15 September 2012). "The Discovery of Greek Sculpture". The Modernity of Ancient Sculpture: Greek Sculpture and Modern Art from Winckelmann to Picasso. New Directions in Classics Series. Vol. 2. London: I.B.Tauris (published 2012). p. 61. ISBN 9781848859036. [...] another grand narrative, no less compelling than the familiar succession of 'isms' [...]
  7. ^ Braund, Susanna Morton (19 July 2005) [2002]. Latin Literature. Classical Foundations. Routledge. p. 65. ISBN 9781134646777. Retrieved 6 August 2023. As President Eisenhower allegedly said, 'All -isms are wasms'. [...] I hope to avoid the tyranny of the -isms [...].
  8. ^ Krieger, Nancy (2020). "Measures of Racism, Sexism, Heterosexism, and Gender Binarism for Health Equity Research: From Structural Injustice to Embodied Harm – An Ecosocial Analysis". Annual Review of Public Health. 41: 37–62. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094017. PMID 31765272.
  9. ^ "The Word of the Year is: -ism | Merriam-Webster".

Further reading

[edit]