User contributions for JustinSmith
Appearance
Results for JustinSmith talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 1,587 edits. Account created on 31 January 2006.
16 March 2022
- 16:3016:30, 16 March 2022 diff hist +801 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Result concerning JustinSmith: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
- 13:1313:13, 16 March 2022 diff hist +1,169 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Result concerning JustinSmith: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:1113:11, 16 March 2022 diff hist +368 Talk:John Campbell (YouTuber) →Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2022: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:5912:59, 16 March 2022 diff hist +368 Talk:John Campbell (YouTuber) →Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2022: Reply Tag: Reply
15 March 2022
- 18:1218:12, 15 March 2022 diff hist +457 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Result concerning JustinSmith: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:0918:09, 15 March 2022 diff hist +255 John Campbell (YouTuber) Why has this edit been undone ? "Ignorant and irrelevant" ? How can a definition of anything be "Ignorant", and how can the definition of a death (of those 175,000) be "irrelevant" Tag: Reverted
- 18:0318:03, 15 March 2022 diff hist +309 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by Firefangledfeathers (re:JustinSmith): Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:5917:59, 15 March 2022 diff hist +808 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Result concerning JustinSmith: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:5412:54, 15 March 2022 diff hist +669 User talk:JustinSmith →Focus on WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV: Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:3311:33, 15 March 2022 diff hist +263 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by (slatersteven): Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:2811:28, 15 March 2022 diff hist +254 John Campbell (YouTuber) Actual definition from https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths Tag: Reverted
- 11:1111:11, 15 March 2022 diff hist +279 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by (slatersteven): Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:0911:09, 15 March 2022 diff hist +1,695 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement →Statement by JustinSmith
14 March 2022
- 16:3016:30, 14 March 2022 diff hist −200 John Campbell (YouTuber) If you insist on it only being in the main body of text, though I still think the opener is biased. However, unlike some, I am open to compromise. Tag: Reverted
- 16:2816:28, 14 March 2022 diff hist +442 John Campbell (YouTuber) No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 16:2416:24, 14 March 2022 diff hist +285 Talk:John Campbell (YouTuber) →Wikipedia is being bought into disrepute: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:2016:20, 14 March 2022 diff hist +383 Talk:Walter von Reichenau →Reichenau, the Pogroms, especially at Belaya Tserkov and Radom: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:1716:17, 14 March 2022 diff hist +728 User talk:JustinSmith →March 22
- 15:5815:58, 14 March 2022 diff hist +176 User talk:JustinSmith →March 22: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:5715:57, 14 March 2022 diff hist +202 John Campbell (YouTuber) Cited indisputable fact Tag: Reverted
- 15:5215:52, 14 March 2022 diff hist +284 User talk:JustinSmith →March 22: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:4815:48, 14 March 2022 diff hist +501 Talk:John Campbell (YouTuber) →Wikipedia is being bought into disrepute: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:4415:44, 14 March 2022 diff hist +589 John Campbell (YouTuber) See Talk Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 15:3115:31, 14 March 2022 diff hist +1,408 Talk:John Campbell (YouTuber) →Wikipedia is being bought into disrepute: new section
- 08:2808:28, 14 March 2022 diff hist +584 John Campbell (YouTuber) The comments are an inaccurate representation of what Campbell said AND indeed of what the cited article said, basically it is about different definitions. Additionally the article implies Campbell is "anti vax" but he is triple vaccinated and frequently advises that those at significant risk of Covid should get vaccinated. These are indisputable facts. Tag: Reverted
13 March 2022
- 21:4521:45, 13 March 2022 diff hist +66 John Campbell (YouTuber) I have watched that broadcast and saying he "claimed that deaths from COVID-19 have been over-counted" is inaccurate. Tag: Reverted
10 March 2022
- 17:3017:30, 10 March 2022 diff hist +8 Walter von Reichenau →Interwar period: See "Talk" Tag: Reverted
- 14:3914:39, 10 March 2022 diff hist +1,211 Talk:Walter von Reichenau →Reichenau, the Pogroms, especially at Belaya Tserkov and Radom: new section
- 14:2114:21, 10 March 2022 diff hist +214 Walter von Reichenau →Interwar period Tag: Reverted
- 14:1614:16, 10 March 2022 diff hist +547 Walter von Reichenau Reichenau's change in attitude to the SS murders. Tag: Reverted
5 March 2022
- 10:2410:24, 5 March 2022 diff hist +5 Boulton Paul Defiant No edit summary
- 10:2410:24, 5 March 2022 diff hist +192 Boulton Paul Defiant Slow production of the Defiant
- 10:1510:15, 5 March 2022 diff hist +11 Boulton Paul Defiant Or ventral attacks.
- 10:1410:14, 5 March 2022 diff hist −11 Boulton Paul Defiant Repetition Tag: Manual revert
- 10:1310:13, 5 March 2022 diff hist +11 Boulton Paul Defiant No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 10:1210:12, 5 March 2022 diff hist +138 Boulton Paul Defiant Beam attacks
- 10:0910:09, 5 March 2022 diff hist +858 Boulton Paul Defiant →Air combat: The Defiant's kill ratio was better than commonly thought
- 09:5809:58, 5 March 2022 diff hist +246 Boulton Paul Defiant Clarification. The Defiant was a very effective bomber destroyer, the role it had been designed for. It had not been designed to take on fighters which, it was thought, would not have the range to fly from Germany.
- 09:5209:52, 5 March 2022 diff hist +410 Boulton Paul Defiant →Air combat: More on the 31st May battle
- 09:4209:42, 5 March 2022 diff hist +157 Boulton Paul Defiant The Defiant was just as successful as the S & H at destroying bombers, arguably more so. That was what it was specifically designed for.
27 February 2022
- 11:4211:42, 27 February 2022 diff hist −8 Hannes Trautloft →Luftwaffe commander: To suggest any alternative strategy Luftwaffe might have resulted in a German victory in the air war is ludicrous.
25 February 2022
- 21:4721:47, 25 February 2022 diff hist +284 Boulton Paul Defiant →Development: Ad
- 15:2015:20, 25 February 2022 diff hist +2 This Is Spinal Tap →Reactions from musicians
24 February 2022
- 20:5420:54, 24 February 2022 diff hist +340 Operation Sea Lion →Chances of success: Beppo Schmid's conclusion about the need for a land invasion
21 February 2022
- 21:4321:43, 21 February 2022 diff hist +20 Hugh Dowding →Battle of Britain: Ad
18 February 2022
- 22:1522:15, 18 February 2022 diff hist +229 GWR 3700 Class 3440 City of Truro →Speed record: Railway Magazine 2015 research
- 21:3221:32, 18 February 2022 diff hist +354 Munich Agreement Undid revision 1070434659 by XAM2175 (talk) I do not agree at all that it is a "trivial sentence", and it is consistent with much of the rest of the chapter on Halder in Correlli Barnett's book. It is far more relevant here than on Halder's page, which relatively few people would ever read anyway. At the time of Munich Halder was Chief of the General Staff of the German Army, not some minor officer. Tag: Undo
10 February 2022
- 11:3111:31, 10 February 2022 diff hist +10 Pointe du Hoc →Attack: Is this the correct meaning ? The existing sentence was contradictory and made no sense.
3 February 2022
- 11:2011:20, 3 February 2022 diff hist +355 Munich Agreement →Germany: Halder's view on Munich in 1969
26 January 2022
- 21:3821:38, 26 January 2022 diff hist +30 Franz von Werra →Capture and escapes: Ad