User contributions for Wikiepdiax818
A user with 310 edits. Account created on 7 January 2011.
16 June 2015
- 23:5023:50, 16 June 2015 diff hist +681 Talk:Jupiter Ascending →Critical response summary removed
- 23:3723:37, 16 June 2015 diff hist +2 m Talk:Jupiter Ascending →Critical response summary removed
- 23:3523:35, 16 June 2015 diff hist +427 Talk:Jupiter Ascending →Critical response summary removed
- 23:3123:31, 16 June 2015 diff hist +997 m Jupiter Ascending Undid revision 667269750 by Cyphoidbomb (talk) You are innapropriately adding unprecedented POV; find contemporary films with similar RT and Meteoritic scores with similar lines in Wiki
- 23:2423:24, 16 June 2015 diff hist +997 m Jupiter Ascending Undid revision 667267710 by Cyphoidbomb (talk) In the talk page I have provided contemporary films with better Metacritic and RT scores that are listed on Wiki as " generally negative"
- 23:2323:23, 16 June 2015 diff hist −985 User talk:Wikiepdiax818 →Jupiter Ascending
- 23:2223:22, 16 June 2015 diff hist +2,078 Talk:Jupiter Ascending →Critical Reception: new section
- 22:5822:58, 16 June 2015 diff hist −54 m User:Wikiepdiax818 No edit summary current
- 22:5822:58, 16 June 2015 diff hist 0 m Jupiter Ascending →Critical reception
- 22:5522:55, 16 June 2015 diff hist +9 m Jupiter Ascending →Critical reception
- 22:5322:53, 16 June 2015 diff hist +128 Jupiter Ascending →Critical reception
- 22:5122:51, 16 June 2015 diff hist +93 Jupiter Ascending →Critical reception: source - "Jupiter Ascending is getting negative reviews and doing weak business"
- 22:4922:49, 16 June 2015 diff hist +114 m Jupiter Ascending →Critical reception: source- JA has "been panned by the critics"
- 22:4822:48, 16 June 2015 diff hist +194 Jupiter Ascending →Critical reception
- 22:4622:46, 16 June 2015 diff hist −10 m Jupiter Ascending →Critical reception: CSMonnitor source leads with "So far reviews have been mostly negative"
- 22:4322:43, 16 June 2015 diff hist −3,198 User talk:Wikiepdiax818 ←Replaced content with '.'
15 June 2015
- 05:2605:26, 15 June 2015 diff hist −9 m Jupiter Ascending Undid revision 666810567 by 73.54.75.2 (talk) unregistered defacement; this page needs to be locked down if this keeps happening
- 05:2405:24, 15 June 2015 diff hist +41 m Game of Thrones season 5 You don't know if it hasn't happen or won't happen at all in the unreleased books
8 June 2015
7 June 2015
- 23:4723:47, 7 June 2015 diff hist +10 m Jupiter Ascending including Metacritic's 4.2 with RT's 25%, that makes this generally negative. The Entourage film out now has similar scores and is listed in Wiki as generally negative. Anything else is inappropriately biased.
- 01:5901:59, 7 June 2015 diff hist +1 m Jupiter Ascending →Critical reception: less than 30% on Rotten Tomatoes does not qualify as "mixed" that's negative, as is the case for every other film with a similar rating
25 May 2015
- 04:5704:57, 25 May 2015 diff hist −701 m Game of Thrones →Use of sex and violence: Not an appropriate source for Wikipedia or literary/media criticism
- 04:5604:56, 25 May 2015 diff hist −984 m Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken →Critical reviews: not a noteworthy site or relevant to GOT
2 May 2015
- 17:3217:32, 2 May 2015 diff hist −8 m North Korea remove needless opining
- 02:2402:24, 2 May 2015 diff hist −13 m +44 (band) unnecessary word
27 April 2015
26 April 2015
- 05:1605:16, 26 April 2015 diff hist +74 Cecily Strong →Other: Don't editorialize
25 April 2015
- 22:2922:29, 25 April 2015 diff hist −43 m Enema of the State →Background: not accurate.
- 01:3001:30, 25 April 2015 diff hist −631 m Ellen Pao →Personal life: this is for a "political views/beliefs" section, not "personal life"
- 00:3600:36, 25 April 2015 diff hist −991 m Michele Leonhart Undid revision 659063786 by Muboshgu (talk) There are plenty of similar articles with "controversy" sections, like the Rush Limbaugh article. If you want to delete it, first go to "talk" page
24 April 2015
- 23:3623:36, 24 April 2015 diff hist −991 m Michele Leonhart Undid revision 659059355 by Muboshgu (talk) you deleted the entire controversy section. there is no reason it should be gone. If you feel so, you must first take it to the talk section.
- 22:4522:45, 24 April 2015 diff hist −991 m Michele Leonhart Undid revision 659004099 by Muboshgu (talk)
- 02:0502:05, 24 April 2015 diff hist −41 m Barry Seal →Undercover informant
- 00:2100:21, 24 April 2015 diff hist −50 m Hugo Chávez No edit summary
23 April 2015
- 20:2420:24, 23 April 2015 diff hist +1 m Hugo Chávez No edit summary
22 April 2015
- 21:1921:19, 22 April 2015 diff hist −94 m Michele Leonhart No edit summary
- 01:1901:19, 22 April 2015 diff hist −8 m Michele Leonhart Undid revision 657904472 by Pjc0131 (talk)
21 April 2015
- 21:5321:53, 21 April 2015 diff hist +6 m Michele Leonhart No edit summary
- 21:4621:46, 21 April 2015 diff hist +203 m Michele Leonhart No edit summary
- 21:4521:45, 21 April 2015 diff hist +2 m Michele Leonhart No edit summary
- 21:4521:45, 21 April 2015 diff hist −28 m Michele Leonhart No edit summary
- 21:4221:42, 21 April 2015 diff hist +371 Michele Leonhart No edit summary
- 21:3921:39, 21 April 2015 diff hist −40 m Michele Leonhart →Controversy
- 21:3921:39, 21 April 2015 diff hist +322 Michele Leonhart →DEA Administrator
- 01:1101:11, 21 April 2015 diff hist +57 Uniloc No edit summary
18 April 2015
- 02:5602:56, 18 April 2015 diff hist +43 m Adam Carolla →Religious and political views
- 02:5502:55, 18 April 2015 diff hist −1 m Adam Carolla →Personal life
- 02:5402:54, 18 April 2015 diff hist +470 Adam Carolla →Religious and political views
12 April 2015
- 06:1706:17, 12 April 2015 diff hist −363 m Jupiter Ascending this is not an op-ed. There need to be citations.
- 00:3900:39, 12 April 2015 diff hist −4 m Paul Blart: Mall Cop No edit summary
