Talk:3DFLOW
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Jcc proposed deletion of this page. I think it should not, especially considering this list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_photogrammetry_software - as there are older companies which software is, compared to the state of the art, way behind the state of the art. The page should be expanded and maybe for focused on the software itself. Potatowned (talk) 09:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Potatowned, please remember to sign your posts. Wikipedia is all about sources- reference reliable sources telling us all about 3DFLow that prove that it is notable. Have a read of Wikipedia:Notability.jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)