This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
--91.89.39.200 (talk) 08:56, 8 May 2011 (UTC)I really don't know Why there is such an advertizing article here in wp. It seems to me that Swoboda has Publisher it and also i find it unusual to find a shoppinglink as resource but not the official homepage. The products of this brand are sold worldwide ( even smaller sites offer Acqua di Parma ) and as a big brand in its niche with so much traditionality it deservers an objective wikipage.[reply]
Yesterday I cleaned up the worst marketing verbiage in this article. The cologne is referenced in the mainstream media (cf. http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/05/12/2011-spring-grooming-trends/) and I feel the brand does deserve a mention, although possibly not a wikipage. Links to shopping sites are not appropriate here while references like the one at Fox News are useful. I will continue to watch the article to remove marketing links and non-neutral opinion and encourage others to also do this. --OliverHargreaves (talk) 01:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]