Talk:Al-Qadim

Fair use rationale for Image:Al-qadim logo.gif

Image:Al-qadim logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

*Facepalm*.

So some anal-retentive wikipedo decided to challenge the notability of Al-Qadim, probably because they've never heard of it.

Every Dungeons & Dragons campaign setting has its own wikipedia article, and yet this is the only one whose notability is being attacked. Even long out of print and comparatively unpopular settings such as Mystara and Spelljammer are being allowed to exist. Al-Qadim, like Kara-Tur/Oriental Adventures was a reasonably popular sub-setting within the Forgotten Realms world. Each D&D campaign world is a rich and detailed concept with at least a dozen published books and modules documenting it. Most have novels based on them, and all have been well documented in numerous role playing magazines.

In conclusion, it's painfully obvious that whoever flagged this article did so out of pettiness and unwarranted sense of self-importance. Again, campaign settings less popular than Al-Qadim have articles. This is not some fanzine or obscure supplement, this is a popular product line within the Dungeons & Dragons franchise. Its notability is self-evident, though fifteen seconds on google could easily confirm it. I'm removing the notability tag and if you want to add it back, you need to have the balls to fucking debate me on it. No hiding behind misinterpreted WP: shit. However I suggest you quit while you're ahead and avoid making any more of a fool of yourself. Good day. Wormwoodpoppies (talk) 17:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Al-Qadim at Forgotten Realms Wiki

The following discussion took place about including the link to Forgotten Realms Wiki: Hello there!
On the Al-Qadim page you removed the link to Forgotten Realms Wiki.
You are of course right that the Al-Qadim article there has no additional information compared to the one here. However Forgotten Realms Wiki wants to cover Al-Qadim related subjects that are not deemed noteworthy at Wikipedia, too. There may not yet be to many such articles, but in my opinion too much to be dismissed. I can think of articles on e.g. all Zakharan deities and all Al-Qadim sourcebooks. Do you think that is enough to keep the link (and perhaps get interested editors to get involved there, too)? Daranios (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't have much of a preference either way; I just thought it was better to include a link to the local page (which didn't seem to have a link until then). Wikipedia:External links discourages overuse of external links which commonly happens with Wikia sites, so I tend to remove certain ones in passing if the local page for that specific topic has more content. In this case, however, it looks like there's some good content there that Wikipedia doesn't have. Garrett^Talk 19:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Meaning

It may be appropriate to mention that al-qadim in Arabic means old or ancient. In religious texts it acquires also other meanings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.17.50.44 (talk) 10:26, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Source it, and you got it! 24.148.0.83 (talk) 12:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Al-Qadim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080215183605/http://enworld.cyberstreet.com/showthread.php?t=80656&page=2 to http://enworld.cyberstreet.com/showthread.php?t=80656&page=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 29 June 2017 (UTC)