Talk:Austrian euro coins
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
coin sizes
[edit]Hello. These images have not been scaled down. They are larger in size than the actual coin size, but the size is according to the Drewery Scale of proportion specifically designed for the euro coins. If they need to be made smaller- so be it, but the larger image shows more detail.
Any thoughts? Theeuro 04:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Eur.aus.001.jpg
[edit]
Image:Eur.aus.001.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Eur.aus.002.jpg
[edit]Image:Eur.aus.002.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Eur.aus.005.jpg
[edit]Image:Eur.aus.005.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Eur.aus.010.jpg
[edit]Image:Eur.aus.010.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Eur.aus.020.jpg
[edit]Image:Eur.aus.020.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Mintage Quantities
[edit]I can't image a reason for anyone to object to putting mintage quantities in these articles, however before I continue to add these quantities to the "sister articles", has anyone any objection to the layout of this information? Kevin hipwell (talk) 21:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- After giving it some thought, it would make more sense to display the face value along horizontal cells and the years along vertical cells, I think this would be better because there will always be an addition of years as time goes by and no addition of denominations, so when updated the presentation of the table wont be comprimised.Kevin hipwell (talk) 01:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Here is a comparison
| Face Value [1] | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| €2.00 | 196.400.000 | 4.700.000 | 2.500.000 | /// | 2.300.000 | /// | ??? |
| €1.00 | 223.500.000 | 150.000 | 2.600.000 | 2.600.000 | 7.700.000 | 41.100.000 | ??? |
| €0.50 | 169.100.000 | 9.100.000 | 3.100.000 | 3.100.000 | 3.200.000 | 3.000.000 | ??? |
| €0.20 | 203.400.000 | 50.900.000 | 54.800.000 | 4.100.000 | 8.200.000 | 45.000.000 | ??? |
| €0.10 | 441.600.000 | 10.000 | 5.200.000 | 5.200.000 | 40.000.000 | 81.300.000 | ??? |
| €0.05 | 217.000.000 | 108.500.000 | 89.300.000 | 66.100.000 | 5.600.000 | 52.700.000 | ??? |
| €0.02 | 326.400.000 | 118.500.000 | 156.400.000 | 163.200.000 | 39.800.000 | 72.200.000 | ??? |
| €0.01 | 378.400.000 | 10.800.000 | 115.000.000 | 174.700.000 | 48.300.000 | 111.900.000 | ??? |
| /// = has not been minted, ??? = unknown as of yet | |||||||
&
| Face Value [2] | €0.01 | €0.02 | €0.05 | €0.10 | €0.20 | €0.50 | €1.00 | €2.00 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 378.400.000 | 326.400.000 | 217.000.000 | 441.600.000 | 203.400.000 | 169.100.000 | 223.500.000 | 196.400.000 |
| 2003 | 10.800.000 | 118.500.000 | 108.500.000 | 10.000 | 50.900.000 | 9.100.000 | 150.000 | 4.700.000 |
| 2004 | 115.000.000 | 156.400.000 | 89.300.000 | 5.200.000 | 54.800.000 | 3.100.000 | 2.600.000 | 2.500.000 |
| 2005 | 174.700.000 | 163.200.000 | 66.100.000 | 5.200.000 | 4.100.000 | 3.100.000 | 2.600.000 | /// |
| 2006 | 48.300.000 | 39.800.000 | 5.600.000 | 40.000.000 | 8.200.000 | 3.200.000 | 7.700.000 | 2.300.000 |
| 2007 | 111.900.000 | 72.200.000 | 52.700.000 | 81.300.000 | 45.000.000 | 3.000.000 | 41.100.000 | /// |
| 2008 | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? |
| /// = has not been minted, ??? = unknown as of yet, --- = only minted for sets | ||||||||
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin hipwell (talk • contribs) 02:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- It is better with the year on the left instead of the denomination. Cheers. The € • T/C 04:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- Kevin, apologies for the delay I am behind in catching up with Wikipedia now a days. I second Theeuro, the years on the left is better since they will continue growing, so teh table will expand downwards instead of to the right.
- Also, on a similar topic, what di you mean by "/// = has not been minted, ??? = unknown as of yet, --- = only minted for sets"?
- Thanks,Miguel.mateo (talk) 07:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- (///) represents no mintage, (???) represents unknown mintage, and (---) represents mintage of the coin for sets only.
- Perhaps this is a little unclear. Kevin hipwell (talk) 07:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Rephrasing, so I can be clear with myself:
- /// = 0 coins minted
- --- = 0 coins for circulation, although some proof sets where minted, quantity unknown
- ??? = N/A (not available yet)
correct? I might do a slight change so this information looks clearer.
Thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 07:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Yes that is correct, do whatever changes you think is necessary to make it clearer.Kevin hipwell (talk) 07:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Kevin,
I have done slight changes in the layout, let me know what you think. I can easily apply that for the other pages.
On a similar topic, reading the Austrian quantities, it was a bit odd for me that year 2007 they mintead almost all nominations in huge quantities but no 2 euro coins, which is supposed to be the year that the new map was introduced. So I went to check the source to see how come Austria minted no 2 euro coins with the new map. Then I saw that they have two extra collumns (2 Euro CC and 2 Euro CC2); which means that Austria in 2005 and 2007, decided to mint only 2 euro commemorative coins, and no normal 2 euro coins. Shouldn't those quantities be somewhere in the table too? I think one extra collumn for 2 euro commemorative is enough. What's yu opinion?
Thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 05:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Miguel, Yes I was aware that Austria never minted the normal €2 in 2005, 2007 quite unfortunate.
- You are correct to insist that the €2 CC be added as they also circulate,
- I excluded the €2 CC simply because another article covered them but this is no reason they should be excluded.
- I think it would be necessary to have the 2 columns for CC as in 2007 many issued 2 €2 CC, it would quite contradictory to include the €2 CC and then treat the 2 €2 CC as though they where 1 coin.
- BTW, your change to the "notes" is much better.Kevin hipwell (talk) 15:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Kevin,
- I've changed it slightly again, let me know what you think. I agree in principle with having two collumns for the 2euro comm. but Austria barely mints commemorative coins, so I do not see the need for two collums in this article, in ther other of course. I have also reduced the table size, looks more compact and easier to read in low resolutions (learning from my own problems) :)
- Reading the table again something caught my attention immediately: the low mintage for 10c coins in 2003. There should be a reason for that and it should be added to the table (if it is true), since the number looks like a mistake. Do you know the reason?
- Let me know your opinion, and of course feel free to change the table layout back to what it was if you disagree with the changes. Regards, Miguel.mateo (talk) 23:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Regarding the low mintage of 10c 2003, the central bank annual report of 2003 says that the mintage was 81 million, clearly very different, however it seems that the annual reports give different mintages for all the coins of all the years, I will have to confirm the reliability of the sources link: [1].I will ask the currency center when I ring them about my order.
- I think for the mintage numbers it would be best to have 'M' after each value eg: 378.4M to indicate the million as the text doesn't stand out enough IMO.
- Of course Austria hasn't ever issued 2 €2 CC in the same year so it is unnecessary to have 2 columns, although this will not be the case next year.Kevin hipwell (talk) 14:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- I am going to try find more sources for mintages to determine the accuracy of the current list Kevin hipwell (talk) 02:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- It appears that in 2003 the only Austrian 10c coins where in sets, 125.000 in BU & 25.000 in Proof.
- Source: Austrian Mint issue values — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin hipwell (talk • contribs) 03:06, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Are you taking a review to the quantities already posted in the article? If not I can do that tomorrow as well ... Miguel.mateo (talk) 11:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Although I think the current source euro-auflagen is a great wealth of info, I would prefer to use the Austrian website as the source, as it is more "official".
- I don't mind if you want to do that, as there is still a lot to be done such as:
- finish the Gold & Silver articles.
- bring up a discussion to include place of mint.
- continue the work on the Euro proof set article.
- Find out what "Diamond Quality" is (Finland sets)
- review all mintage quantities
- "sisterize" all the euro coin articles (basically that they are all coherent with each other)
- create and complete an article for euro BU/FDC sets7
- and probably more I haven't thought about yet. Kevin hipwell (talk) 15:32, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oh men, you do have immagination! I can forthsee a long path to go here ... Miguel.mateo (talk) 03:02, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Circulating Mintage quantities". Henning Agt. Retrieved 2008-08-19.
- ^ "Circulating Mintage quantities". Henning Agt. Retrieved 2008-08-19.
Image copyright problem with Image:€2 commemorative coin Austria 2007 TOR.jpg
[edit]The image Image:€2 commemorative coin Austria 2007 TOR.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
File:2 Euro coin At.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]
|
An image used in this article, File:2 Euro coin At.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
|
| Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:08, 16 May 2011 (UTC) |
File:1 euro cent Austria.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]|
|
An image used in this article, File:1 euro cent Austria.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
|
| Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC) |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Austrian euro coins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030203713/http://www.ibiblio.org:80/theeuro/files/files.nat/austria.s01.htm to http://www.ibiblio.org/theeuro/files/files.nat/austria.s01.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:37, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
