Talk:Cone beam computed tomography

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dentistry Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Dentistry. If you want to participate and/or join, please visit the project page, or ask questions on the project talk page.DentistryWikipedia:WikiProject DentistryTemplate:WikiProject Dentistrydentistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cone beam computed tomography.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

improvements

images added to explain algorithmic process. The non human data stems from artificial material an so can be published without affecting a patient's privacy.

More explanation on the processing and functionality of the CBCT should be added by native speakers of the english language 87.167.108.76 (talk) 01:32, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article doesn't list Elekta from Sweden. I'm working on an upgrade to Gamma Knife equipment at a hospital in CA, and they're adding a motorized, articulating CBCT gantry arm which rotates around the patient's head. Might be the first OSHPD 1 installation in CA... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.65.188.130 (talk) 16:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed audiology sentence

I have removed this text: "Recently CBCT scanners were in discussing in the field of audiology in Canada scanning the auditory ear canal to produce ear mold prosthesis (hearing aids)currently under U.S and patent trademark provision filed by Norton Rose law firm in Canada." from the introduction. It does not belong in the introduction, the grammar is very bad, and possibly was added by people involved in this matter & isn't really notable. —DIV (137.111.13.36 (talk) 06:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC))[reply]

MDCT

MDCT links to modified discrete cosine transform, and I can't see why a transform. rather than a tomographic imaging method would be a competitor? I am really not sure what the author meant here. The references are to C-arm systems. Should we maybe delete this section unless anyone can work out what it is meant to mean and fix it? Maybe they meant multi detector rows - but that is cone beam CT.Billlion (talk) 11:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've piped it to Multi-detector CT, which redirects to CT (which doesn't seems to explain multi-detector very well). - Rod57 (talk) 22:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems biased - lots of unbalanced criticism

Limitations/Risks/Disadvantages - Should be toned down or balanced with the benefits and advantages ? - Rod57 (talk) 22:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cone beam computed tomography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20140718023206/http://jada.ada.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=20884934 to http://jada.ada.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=20884934

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]