Talk:Equality (Titles) Bill

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 August 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

A fact from Equality (Titles) Bill appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Downton Abbey law allows for equal succession of female heirs to hereditary titles and peerages?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Equality (Titles) Bill.

Wikipedia

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism Mid‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hereditary Titles (Female Succession) Bill

It looks like a bill with substantially the same purpose was introduced in 2017. [1] Is it worth expanding the scope of this article to cover both bills? AndrewRT(Talk) 20:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AndrewRT: As far as I can tell, nothing happened with the (2017–2019) bill aside from its first reading. I'm not convinced there is a need to change the scope, but the newer bill could be mentioned in a section on related legislation (as well as in the primogeniture article). gobonobo ⁺ ^c 04:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]