Talk:Hizb ut-Tahrir America

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... it is a page constructed to be a consortium of HTA material. All material is cited to reputable news and research outlets that have conducted extensive research on the topic. The page is not promotional, but in fact, falls within the boundaries of all Wikipedia pages: educational. The large majority of the page is cited, as stated above, to legitimate sources; which sections specifically are found to be inadequate? --Studentocean (talk) 01:28, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a few of the blogs and right-wing PACs, but most of the article is still sourced to other political organizations rather than to scholarly books or news sources, ie. WP:RS. This means that not only do we not know any/most of the information is accurate, we also don't know that the organization is notable enough to merit an article, since for all we know just looking at this article, the two news articles cited are the only coverage of it. It is necessary to cite reliable sources both to attest notability and to make sure all information is accurate. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also with regard to notability, we'd need to see that the American organization had independent notability from the main organization, which already has an article - so the two news sources cited are actually totally inadequate. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why were the videos deleted? They were supporting material for HTA education - the reader sees through video media the active, as well as advanced, nature of the group. They were clips of HTA members, HTA critics, & HTA proponents.

File:HTA Khalifornia.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:HTA Khalifornia.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:05, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hizb ut-Tahrir America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111027003924/http://shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Shariah-The-Threat-to-America-Team-B-Report-Web-09292010.pdf to http://shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Shariah-The-Threat-to-America-Team-B-Report-Web-09292010.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]