Talk:Information professional

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

Untitled

Editors ought not remove information that's useful, regardless of whether the source is a company. If it's a one-resource-list, make it a two- or three-resource-list instead. Factiva is a legitimate resource for Information Professionals. I, for one, would like to see what contribution they have to offer. Unsigned comments added by anonymous User:70.19.84.92

Resources for information professionals

This may be useful, but it's a one-resource-list that serves as a spamvertisement for Factiva. It's "funny" how the SLA information quickly devolves into another spamvertisement for Factiva. If you check out the spammer's contributions to Wikipedia, they all involve posting Factiva spam in different articles. Rklawton 15:51, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What abut undergraduate degrees in IS producing IP's?

I consider myself an Information Professional and I only have a BS in Information Science. Half of my major classes and nearly all my major electives were IS classes taught at the Masters Level.

I can run circles around most current IS grad students, so why is the title privy to only those with a MSIS/MSLS?

Sounds kind of shady and snobbish to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theothertomjones (talk • contribs) 21:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IPs are a wide range of occupations

Information Professionals is the all encompassing group of which Archivists and Librarians are only a part. There are many other people in a wide range of occupations who are 'information professionals'.

Bill Proudfit (talk) 10:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Bill Proudfit[reply]

Update the first paragraph

I feel like the first paragraph is not clear enough and could use some updating. I have done so. Will try and update it some more soon. --Sally.Albright (talk) 03:51, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Information professional. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Wikipedia supported by WikiProject Wikipedia and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 15:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]