This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
Prior to posting this request, I did search at Wikimedia commons for an Albany Diocese COA file.
If an official image is available, please upload to Commons with standard name of: Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany.svg.
Thanks in advance. Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 15:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Sam Rodino controversy section seems grossly disproportionate to the article. As a relatively short start-class article, each section is a rather superficial overview. Yet, the Sam Rodino section is significantly longer than both the lead section and history section, while nearly as long as the section on the cathedra. It also possess no citations of any kind. This section should either be deleted or greatly pared down, cited, and moved into another section or, more likely, into another article. Ergo Sum (talk) 18:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I added the multiple issues banner to the section including tags for POV, undue weight, and unreferenced biographies. In particular, this section contains information falling under the biographies of living persons guidelines including material that may be perceived by a reasonable person to be potentially libelous. If no citations are added and the multiple issues fixed, I will remove it in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines in a timely manner. Ergo Sum (talk) 18:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
