Template talk:Berkshire Hathaway
Appearance
This template was nominated for deletion on December 13, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Comments
[edit]I've only included subsidiaries / majority-owned companies, not companies where Berkshire Hathaway has a minority stake, like Coca-Cola and PetroChina. --Crocodile Punter 11:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- right only wholy owned subsidiaries, I changed Chase to Decker (sorry to see him go) Pohick2 (talk) 23:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I screwed up the infobox
[edit]by adding all the newspapers (former Media General papers from here [1]). I know, the infobox is much less pretty (useful?) now.
Should the World-Herald Co. and Media World have their own articles? They are "sister companies" under BH Media Group; the W-H Co. subsidiary Midlands Newspapers owns most of the properties on its branch. Maybe only "major" newspapers should be listed.
Buffalo and Business Wire are separate, AFAIK. Woodshed (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)