User talk:91.10.61.108

June 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Horologium (talk) 05:27, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

91.10.61.108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

"Harassment" as a block justification is weak at the best of times, Horologium is not even user if it is harassment or personal attacks. One of the two, either one, take your pick. My "crime" was to point out several different types of 5P violations by one user. The timing of my postings was determined by these actions. 91.10.61.108 (talk) 05:33, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

When you're told you're wrong, and that consensus is that you're wrong, forum-shopping to try and obtain action against a specific user is indeed harassment. All of your edits from this IP are indeed continuation of that same harassment - we don't have time/space for this type of behaviour - it's a collaborative project (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---