User talk:Bhargava Krishna

Bhargava Krishna, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Bhargava Krishna! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prof Dr. B.H.Briz Kishore

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prof Dr. B.H.Briz Kishore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shrikanthv (talk) 15:02, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prof Dr. B.H.Briz Kishore

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prof Dr. B.H.Briz Kishore, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pandem (2005)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pandem (2005), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.moviemastinmusic.com/2012/05/pandem.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kabadi Kabadi (2003 film)

added a link pointing to Ravi Varma

Pandem (2005)

added a link pointing to Ravi Varma

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jagapati (2005 film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jagapati (2005 film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://istream-movie.com/movies/593599-jagapathi.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:00, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brahmastram (2007 film)

The article Brahmastram (2007 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable film. No information with IMDb (reviews, criticism, etc.) and seems to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 15:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dham (2003 Telugu film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dham (2003 Telugu film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://mtelugu.com/siteinfo/videodetails/2429.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:13, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Bhargava Krishna, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 13:11, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi there.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.--220 of ^Borg 13:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Nagaram (2008 film) while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 02:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nagaram Nidrapotunna Vela (2011 film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nagaram Nidrapotunna Vela (2011 film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.gulte.com/moviereviews/210/Nagaram-Nidra-Potunna-Vela-Movie-Review.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:19, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Multiple articles you have submitted appear to copy most of their content directly from other websites. This is a copyright violation. The plot summaries of these movies must be rewritten in an original way or the articles will risk deletion. Please do not remove the maintenance templates again. Weedwacker (talk) 20:28, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Naalo Unna Prema

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Naalo Unna Prema, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.teluguone.com/movies/details/Comedy-naalo-unna-prema-MOV000583.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:22, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not copy plot summaries from external websites

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Consider this your final warning. MER-C 07:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nagaram (2008 film)

added links pointing to Ravi Varma and Pradeep Rawat

Jagapati

added a link pointing to Pradeep Rawat

Raksha (2008 film)

added a link pointing to Pradeep Rawat

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recurring errors

Hi Bhargava Krishna, I wanted to make you aware of some recurring errors you make in the film articles you create. Since these are things that are easily fixed, but nevertheless take some effort to clean up, it is better if you are aware of them yourself so you don't introduce the errors when you create the articles.

You use the phrase "Music composed by x", which is grammatically incorrect. If you say "Music composed" it means that it was the music that did the composing. You have to have a form of the very to be in order to make it correct - in this case "was", thus, "music was composed by x". In addition, there has to be a definite article, "the", before "music". "The music was composed by x".
Similarly, you use the phrase "Music released on x"; again, you need to add a form of to be and a definite article: "The music was released". When you say "released on x" it is unclear whether "x" is a label (in which case you would say "released on the x label"), or simply a company name (in which case you need to say "released by x".
Finally, and very importantly, it is not appropriate to add unsourced non-neutral phrasings such as "The film was a flop/hit/blockbuster" or "All the songs were hits". Please do not make any such value judgments, since those are against Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 14:51, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the above information. Since you have created three new articles with the identical problems, you probably haven't had time to look at the above information. Please take a moment to do so now. --bonadea contributions talk 14:16, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alludugaaru Vachcharu

added a link pointing to Telugu

Balaramakrishnulu

added a link pointing to Rami Reddy

Choosoddaam Randi

added a link pointing to Telugu

Family Circus (film)

added a link pointing to Telugu

Sardukupodaam Randi

added a link pointing to Telugu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

You systematically log out to edit the articles you have created, removing "unreviewed" and other necessary tags, and reverting improvements to the articles made by other editors. This is disruptive, and it prevents the articles you create from being improved. Please stop. Do not edit while logged out. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:53, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chilakapachcha Kaapuram. As above. Logging out to remove essential tags from many different articles. bonadea contributions talk 09:22, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bhargava Krishna, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

bonadea contributions talk 10:58, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:59, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Raguluthunna Bharatham

Hi, I'm Lstanley1979. Bhargava Krishna, thanks for creating Raguluthunna Bharatham!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi there! Thanks for uploading the article. You need to give us some references for the various parts of the film. But otherwise, good work and thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. LouiseS1979 (talk) 14:22, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mother India (1992 film), you may be blocked from editing.

You are not interested in writing articles without grammar errors (since you still do it despite detailed advice) and that is one thing, but when you RESTORE the grammar errors that other editors have corrected, it is disruptive. bonadea contributions talk 09:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jagapati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pradeep Rawat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asadhyulu

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Asadhyulu, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.donehealth.com/%E0%B6%B4%E0%B7%85%E0%B6%B8%E0%B7%94%E0%B7%80%E0%B6%B1-%E0%B7%86%E0%B7%90%E0%B6%B1%E0%B7%8A%E0%B7%83%E0%B7%92%E0%B7%83%E0%B7%8A-%E0%B7%81%E0%B7%94%E0%B6%AF%E0%B7%8A%E0%B6%B0%E0%B7%9D%E0%B6%AD%E0%B7%8A.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reported

Since you have ignored the many warnings given to you, here and on the talk pages of the various IPs you have used, and still persist in restoring copyrighted text to articles in violation of Wikipedia's rules, your account has been reported to the administrators for vandalism. Copyright violations are not tolerated, and your account could now be blocked. --bonadea contributions talk 12:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pandirimancham

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pandirimancham, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.donehealth.com/new-best-speeder-razor.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:32, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. However, if you return to posting copyright-infringing material, you may be blocked for much longer, perhaps indefinitely. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. User:JamesBWatson (talk) 16:08, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sankalpam) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sankalpam, Bhargava Krishna!

Wikipedia editor Legacypac just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

clearing unreviewed pages

To reply, leave a comment on Legacypac's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Chinnari Muddula Papa) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Chinnari Muddula Papa, Bhargava Krishna!

Wikipedia editor Legacypac just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

its been tagged with issues, clear from the unreviewed list

To reply, leave a comment on Legacypac's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Naalo Unna Prema) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Naalo Unna Prema, Bhargava Krishna!

Wikipedia editor Legacypac just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

already tagged with issues

To reply, leave a comment on Legacypac's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nippu Ravva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Boss. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seetarama Kalyalam

Bhargava, could you please add some sources for Seetarama Kalyalam? I took me a couple minutes to find even confirmation that this film even exists. I still haven't found sources worth putting on the article. Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Babai – Abbai) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Babai – Abbai, Bhargava Krishna!

Wikipedia editor Lstanley1979 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work - I've given the article a copy-edit for English style, usage and grammar. Please could you add some sources to the article as soon as possible - thank you for contributing.

To reply, leave a comment on Lstanley1979's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Allari Krishnaiah

added a link pointing to Mikkilineni

Bhairava Dweepam

added a link pointing to Mikkilineni

Shri Krishnarjuna Vijayam

added a link pointing to Mikkilineni

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing.

Please stop adding "{|class="wik{{Track listing". It should just be "{{Track listing" Example was in Talli Tandrulu. Bgwhite (talk) 06:36, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop adding "{|class="wik{{Track listing" Bgwhite (talk) 00:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

stop adding "{|class="wik{{Track listing" Bgwhite (talk) 08:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adavilo Abhimanyudu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 11:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Lorry Driver (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:05, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bala Gopaludu

The article Bala Gopaludu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

subject is non notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 18:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anuraga Devatha

added a link pointing to Mikkilineni

Bala Gopaludu

added a link pointing to Backdrop

Janani Janmabhoomi

added a link pointing to Classical

Vamsanikokkadu

added a link pointing to Jayanthi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indian film stubs

Hello! Thank you for all the work you've done, in adding articles about Indian films to Wikipedia. However, when adding new articles, could you please include a relevant stub tag on the article, and/or the {{WikiProject Film}} banner on the talk page? This will help the article be included in the appropriate categories and task forces. Thanks, and keep up the good work! Fortdj33 (talk) 15:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Priyaragalu (film), without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 02:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for repeated violations of the copyright policy despite a prior block and refusal to utilise this page

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MER-C 04:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Raksha (2008 film)

Hi, I'm Ymblanter. Bhargava Krishna, thanks for creating Raksha (2008 film)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for the article. It lacks references to reliable sources, and I was not able to find any myself. Would you please find sources and add them into the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ymblanter (talk) 11:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nippulanti Manishi (1986 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nippulanti Manishi (1986 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nippulanti Manishi (1986 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BenLinus 1214^talk 22:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anuraga Devatha

Hello Bhargava Krishna,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Anuraga Devatha for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Nicky mathew (talk) 13:34, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raguluthunna Bharatham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raguluthunna Bharatham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raguluthunna Bharatham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raguluthunna Bharatham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raguluthunna Bharatham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raguluthunna Bharatham (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:07, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raguluthunna Bharatham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raguluthunna Bharatham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raguluthunna Bharatham (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manasulo Maata for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manasulo Maata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manasulo Maata until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 03:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Teerpu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teerpu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teerpu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kailash29792 (talk) 10:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rana (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rana (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana (film) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kailash29792 (talk) 14:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Swapnalokam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swapnalokam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swapnalokam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kailash29792 (talk) 14:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bharyabhartala Bandham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bharyabhartala Bandham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharyabhartala Bandham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--Filmomusico (talk) 22:08, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pandem (movie) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pandem (movie) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pandem (movie) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--Filmomusico (talk) 22:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rowdy Ramudu Konte Krishnudu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rowdy Ramudu Konte Krishnudu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rowdy Ramudu Konte Krishnudu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--Filmomusico (talk) 02:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]