User talk:ChowderRulez

Welcome to my talk page. --ChowderRulez (talk) 22:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, I'm Jack90s15. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jack90s15 (talk) 02:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do apologize. --ChowderRulez (talk) 02:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Dexter's Laboratory characters

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Dexter's Laboratory characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dom from Paris (talk) 08:27, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. --ChowderRulez (talk) 13:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Powerpuff Girls (franchise) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Powerpuff Girls (franchise). Since you had some involvement with the The Powerpuff Girls (franchise) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends (franchise) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends (franchise). Since you had some involvement with the Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends (franchise) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Codename: Kids Next Door (franchise) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Codename: Kids Next Door (franchise). Since you had some involvement with the Codename: Kids Next Door (franchise) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Ed, Edd n Eddy. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. --ChowderRulez (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Ben 10 (2005 TV series) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. LiberatorG (talk) 18:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Cartoon Network, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 00:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cow and Chicken has been nominated for discussion

Category:Cow and Chicken, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 00:16, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ben 10 (2006 TV series)

The article Ben 10 (2006 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Undiscussed move.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 00:55, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Ben 10 (2005 TV series) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Ben 10 (2006 TV series). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:07, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Life and Times of Juniper Lee has been nominated for discussion

Category:The Life and Times of Juniper Lee, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:48, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 20:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Powerpuff Girls, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello ChowderRulez, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to ThunderCats Roar have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hut 8.5 18:54, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Samurai Jack (season 4) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Samurai Jack (season 4), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:35, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Samurai Jack (season 3) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Samurai Jack (season 3), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Samurai Jack (season 2) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Samurai Jack (season 2), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Samurai Jack (season 1) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Samurai Jack (season 1), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Samurai Jack has a season 5 article here on Wikipedia. --ChowderRulez (talk) 16:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Primal (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Primal (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primal (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. --ChowderRulez (talk) 15:56, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:DextersLablogo.png

Thanks for uploading File:DextersLablogo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. --ChowderRulez (talk) 04:33, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dexter's Laboratory infobox image

To prevent an edit war, I'm messaging you here to resolve this issue we seem to be having on Dexter's Laboratory. I twice reverted your edits to the image file for the Dexter's Laboratory infobox, both times asking for an explanation for your changes. After my second revert, you gave me the following:

"I believe a standalone logo for Dexter's Laboratory should be used, because it was more fitting."

While it is your personal opinion to believe that one image may be more favorable than another, it is inconsistent with the guidelines of this website to make such a change solely upon your opinion without citing a Wikipedia policy, precedent, or guideline. If you have one of these to source your changes, please include it in your reply. On top of that, Dexter's Laboratory is classified as a Good Article, and it has been thoroughly critiqued by many editors to get to that point. In the past, this article did use a logo for the series as you have suggested, but a fully resolved title card was deemed more preferable at the time. To this extent, I found your explanation lacking in reference to any current guidelines surrounding animated Cartoon Network television series such as this one.

I look forward to your reply so that we can resolve this matter once and for all. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 00:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. --ChowderRulez (talk) 00:19, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Lazlo

It's the same thing as Dexter's Laboratory. You haven't provided a rationale for your change to the infobox image accepted by consensus. You have also added a short, unsourced paragraph in the reception section, which could potentially be heavily biased. Please provide an explanation. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 00:34, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. --ChowderRulez (talk) 01:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Camp Lazlo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Camp Lazlo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DexterLaboratory.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DexterLaboratory.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Banana Splits Movie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 07:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Banana Splits Movie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel Zero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Milo Murphy's Law into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists!, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not falsify what sources say. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Dexter's Laboratory characters" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Dexter's Laboratory characters. Since you had some involvement with the List of Dexter's Laboratory characters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ミラ P 04:20, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Buffy the Vampire Slayer (franchise)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Buffy the Vampire Slayer (franchise). Since you had some involvement with the Buffy the Vampire Slayer (franchise) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:53, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 18:59, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. --ChowderRulez (talk) 18:59, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wolf Tracer's Dinosaur Island moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wolf Tracer's Dinosaur Island, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:51, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of adult animated television series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:J. G. Quintel

Template:J. G. Quintel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jellystone! (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Jellystone! instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jellystone! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jellystone!, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChowderRulez! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tooned Out (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A case of WP:TOOSOON, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tooned Out and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tooned Out, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:51, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if a draft isn't accepted, that does not mean you should create the article; in fact, it means exactly the opposite. Please don't do that again. Trivialist (talk) 02:23, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Droopy. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 17:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Tooned Out has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:09, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll stop. Can we just please keep the Tooned Out article? --ChowderRulez (talk) 15:35, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Digital eMation. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 22:50, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. --ChowderRulez (talk) 02:25, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Primal (TV series) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Primal (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TV-Loonland AG moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, TV-Loonland AG, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:58, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. --ChowderRulez (talk) 14:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Youri the Spaceman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Youri the Spaceman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 02:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Samurai Jack (season 1) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Samurai Jack (season 1), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Samurai Jack (season 4) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Samurai Jack (season 4), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Samurai Jack (season 2) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Samurai Jack (season 2), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kim Possible characters has been nominated for discussion

Category:Kim Possible characters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 19:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Primal (TV series)

Hello, ChowderRulez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Primal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Samurai Jack (season 3) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Samurai Jack (season 3), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Homer Flea moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Homer Flea, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 00:12, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Samurai Jack (season 4)

Hello, ChowderRulez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samurai Jack".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Samurai Jack (season 3)

Hello, ChowderRulez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samurai Jack".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:01, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taco Bell chihuahua, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Maltese Falcon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billy & Mandy's Big Boogey Adventure, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Greg Ellis and George Ball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. oknazevad (talk) 22:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Genre bloat

Re: this, |genre= isn't for adding every possible dramatic or comedic or artistic technique employed in by a TV series. It's for the main one or two ways that most sources would describe the series. No singular source would describe Hi Hi Puffy Ami Yumi as "an action adventure comedy fantasy slapstick musical science fiction" series. More genres isn't better and some members of WikiProject Television think that three genres is more than plenty. Please keep it simple in the future and provide references. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SightonSound.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SightonSound.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Craig Kellman" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Craig Kellman. Since you had some involvement with the Craig Kellman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:10, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wolf Tracer's Dinosaur Island concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wolf Tracer's Dinosaur Island, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Angry Beavers has been nominated for deletion

Category:The Angry Beavers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 21:50, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Judgemental Films

Hello, ChowderRulez,

Thank you for creating Judgemental Films.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The page has no references. Please provide as per article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Amkgp (talk) 17:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TV series infoboxes

Information in TV series infoboxes, like distributors, should reflect a show's original run and not later owners or companies. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 21:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. --ChowderRulez (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 22:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. --ChowderRulez (talk) 22:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Doug (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. As you've already been told, stick to the original runs of shows. Magitroopa (talk) 22:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. --ChowderRulez (talk) 22:39, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Judgemental Films

Hello, ChowderRulez,

Thank you for creating Judgemental Films.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 23:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Beavis and Butt-Head Do America. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:10, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for this edit creating an unsourced BLP despite the many previous warnings. Once the block expires you may continue to edit constructively, but failure to heed other editors' advice will result in further blocks, for longer periods of time. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jellystone! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jellystone! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jellystone! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:The Banana Splits DVD cover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The Banana Splits DVD cover.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beavis and Butt-Head Do America

You boldly added "to date". I reverted you. The next step, per WP:BRD, is to discuss the issue, not restore your preferred version.

Yes, it is currently true. However, it certainly can change. Please avoid using dated language. - SummerPhD^v2.0 02:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. --ChowderRulez (talk) 03:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Banana Splits DVD cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Banana Splits DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 02:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comedy Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viacom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wolf Tracer's Dinosaur Island

Hello, ChowderRulez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wolf Tracer's Dinosaur Island".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Aoidh

I reverted your edits covering Warner Home Video, and left an explanation on the talk page explaining the rationale behind that here. Aoidh (talk) 16:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Looney Tunes Cartoons.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Looney Tunes Cartoons.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:47, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Looney Tunes Cartoons.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Looney Tunes Cartoons.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:TV-Loonland AG concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:TV-Loonland AG, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:56, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Wacky World of Tex Avery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Terry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:TV-Loonland AG

Hello, ChowderRulez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TV-Loonland AG".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BeanyandCecil1988.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BeanyandCecil1988.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marlou Films moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Marlou Films, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 14:15, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Homer Flea concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Homer Flea, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anatole (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JohnCallahansPelswick.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JohnCallahansPelswick.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm BaldiBasicsFan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 13:28, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Homer Flea

Hello, ChowderRulez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Homer Flea".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rintindumb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lucky Comics.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Funpak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Rubin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Funpak moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Funpak, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 04:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Funpak.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Funpak.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Funpak (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Funpak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Funpak, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Kids' Fun Festival" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kids' Fun Festival. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 22#Kids' Fun Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fillerbunny

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fillerbunny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fillerbunny. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 05:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fillerbunny moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fillerbunny, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Snowycats (talk) 05:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Television series without speech

Category:Television series without speech has been nominated for merging. Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_October_26#Category:Television_series_without_speech. – Fayenatic London 23:00, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Funpak moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Funpak, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Funpak.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Funpak.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Youri the Spaceman

Hello, ChowderRulez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Youri the Spaceman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marlou Films

Hello, ChowderRulez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marlou Films".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fillerbunny

Hello, ChowderRulez. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fillerbunny, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fillerbunny

Hello, ChowderRulez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fillerbunny".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Star vs. the Forces of Evil has been nominated for deletion

Category:Star vs. the Forces of Evil has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies

Hello, ChowderRulez. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HHPAY Girls Rock!.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HHPAY Girls Rock!.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tooned Out

The article Tooned Out has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American Dragon: Jake Long has been nominated for deletion

Category:American Dragon: Jake Long has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:20th Century Studios theatrical animated features

Template:20th Century Studios theatrical animated features has been nominated for merging with Template:20th Century Animation. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. DilatoryRevolution (talk) 06:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sealab 2021.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sealab 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Funpak

Hello, ChowderRulez. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Funpak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Funpak

Hello, ChowderRulez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Funpak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:58, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Natalia Wójcik

Hello, ChowderRulez. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Natalia Wójcik, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't I be blocked permanently?

I've been blocked for a whole year. That means I have to be blocked permanently, just for being blocked for a year. ChowderRulez (talk) 03:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChowderRulez. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 08:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Teacher's Pet (TV series) has been nominated for deletion

Category:Teacher's Pet (TV series) has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:27, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kyle A. Carrozza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kyle A. Carrozza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Carrozza. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	unblock him DexterRulez (talk) 17:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]