User talk:DRosenbach

edit count | edit summary check | logs | WikiChecker

Shalom! Please do not modify a post unless your modification represents an updated version of what was previously posted.
Should you wish to post a different message, please add it to the end with a new heading.
Thank you.

Archives

Grimmauld Place

It is a pretty old question, so you may have missed it, but I think I finally have the answer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2013_January_3#House_numbering_in_Britain

WT:DENT

Hello, DRosenbach. You have new messages at WT:DENT#Comments requested for proposed changes to Template:oral pathology.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Linking

Hi, thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Please note that years, dates, and common terms (including commonly recognised countries and geographical names) are not normally linked. Please ask me if you have any questions. Tony (talk) 14:14, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright -- thanks for the tip! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 21:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User page

a few of your creations were deleted, so they're redlinks. You may know this already, but I figured I'd point it out. Enigma^msg 19:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They were merely pulled into WikiMedia Commons or reformatted into more sophistocated diagrams under a different title, but thanks. Perhaps it is time to get rid of all that red. And thanks for checking up on me to make sure that I'm still alive :) -- have a great day! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 02:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I checked them myself to see the deletion reason, but whatever the case, you can see why it wouldn't make sense to have read lynx. :) Enigma^msg 03:06, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying user about missing file description(s) (bot - disable)

File:Jonathan Rietti PHOTO2.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Jonathan Rietti PHOTO2.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 22:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:StevenIWeiss.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:StevenIWeiss.jpg, which you've attributed to Steven I. Weiss. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 16:59, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steven I. Weiss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frumsatire.net

Excuse me, but are you the famous DRosenbach I've seen so often on frumsatire.net?Nzk10 (talk) 23:36, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 03:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Question about Gateways (organization)

I just thought maybe I would bring this to your attention as I note that you had involvement in previous discussions on a related topic. Bus stop (talk) 10:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Science rules.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Science rules.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celerymontage.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Celerymontage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:ACchargers.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:24, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:BuccalObjectRule2.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:BuccalObjectRule.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:CAtree.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:17, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Chronic apical periodontitis (with arrows).jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Columbia currettes.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Independent eye

If you have a minute, and the inclination, can you take a look at Ken Hebel, I tripped across it while redoing dental implant. It seems like self promotion and a poorly referenced BLP. The creating user is shebel13 who's put an exact copy of the page on their own user page. The problem is I know the person and don't feel objective in marking it one-way or another. I would appreciate a look from a NPOV. Ian Furst (talk) 01:24, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

Do you know how to submit info to OTRS? I've received pictures of regenerative endo from Ken Hargreaves (author of Pathways of the Pulp) for our article. I can upload them but I'm not sure how to submit the info that we release them. Ian Furst (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Email me and I'll send you the address and info you need to submit. You can do so by going to my userpage and clicking on the link on the left within "tools" called "email this user" -- and I recommend you activate this feature for your own account. Do so here: [1]. All the best! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 11:08, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 24/6: A Jewish Theater Company

The article 24/6: A Jewish Theater Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 14:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Wilcock for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Wilcock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Wilcock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 18:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

for the Barnstar - greatly appreciated. Ian Furst (talk) 18:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Outbreak (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

the lead role of a similar team at the [[Center for Disease Control and Prevention]] in [[Atlanta]]], [[Georgia]] and is convinced by Daniels to recommend an alert from the CDC, but her superior

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Columbia College of Dental Medicine Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Columbia College of Dental Medicine Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Cashew Invaders.png

Thanks for uploading File:Cashew Invaders.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TexasDentalBranch.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TexasDentalBranch.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gingival graft, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Graft and Dorsum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invisalign

Hi Dr. Rosenbach. I have a financial connection with Invisalign, which I am preparing for a Good Article nomination. On the Talk page I have shared a draft of the remaining content I think would be needed to make it GAN-ready. While most of the article is business-oriented, this section involves medical claims and mostly summarizes the two review articles available in PubMed that are less than five years old. I started looking through participants in WikiProject Dentistry and you are the only one I found so far that is still actively editing! If you have time to take a look at the discussion and draft and participate there, it would be greatly appreciated. CorporateM (Talk) 20:17, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for ranking the article! I wanted to make sure you knew I was referring to the discussion at the very bottom of the Talk page regarding a "Comparison" section under the title GA preparation. The rest of the article was implemented back in July. I wasn't sure if you just hadn't looked at it yet or if I had left things confusing, since I used the same draft space. CorporateM (Talk) 19:11, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Runningroom.png

Thanks for uploading File:Runningroom.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BMNH3.png

Thanks for uploading File:BMNH3.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BMNH2.png

Thanks for uploading File:BMNH2.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BMNH1.png

Thanks for uploading File:BMNH1.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BMNH.png

Thanks for uploading File:BMNH.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 24/6: A Jewish Theater Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 24/6: A Jewish Theater Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24/6: A Jewish Theater Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eeekster (talk) 21:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:DSeid.png

Thanks for uploading File:DSeid.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:DS Headshot 2014.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:DS Headshot 2014.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 12:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review article?

Hi DRosenbach.

I'm a consultant hired by LRN to work on a Wikipedia article about them and I've created a draft at Draft:LRN. Working on articles with a WP:COI is actually something I specialize in. I try to be very careful to disclose my COI on the Talk page, abide by WP:NPOV, reliable sourcing and other Wikipedia policies. I've published many Wikipedia article this way. I write a lot more about myself on my use page: User:BC1278

As you know, one of the things you have when you have a COI when you create or edit an article it to have an independent reviewer go over everything. So I've placed Draft:LRN in the AFC space.

But I thought you might be interested in being the reviewer since I know you already did a lot of research into Dov Seidman when you wrote the article about him. Any interest?

Cheers,

Ed

BC1278 (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2015 (UTC)BC1278[reply]

Proposed deletion of J. K. Amalou

Hello, DRosenbach. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, J. K. Amalou, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want J. K. Amalou to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ubiquity (talk) 20:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- it saved before I was able to add it, but I've added it now. Thanks for your constructive oversight! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 20:24, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eli Mansour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eli Mansour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eli Mansour (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. agtx 15:12, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invisalign

Hi Dr. Rosenbach. Based on your userpage and prior activity on the Invisalign page, I figured you might have some expertise on the topic. I have started a discussion here about the most accurate way to briefly summarize how Invisalign is viewed by the dental community regarding its efficacy. If you have a minute, we could really use someone that is familiar with the topic to provide input. CorporateM (Talk) 22:47, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know of an orthodontist that might be able to help? CorporateM (Talk) 23:55, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BenShapiro.png

Thanks for uploading File:BenShapiro.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben Shapiro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Runningroom.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Runningroom.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Assassin (2015 film)

The article Assassin (2015 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While difficult to research because of the commonality of the name, could find nothing on any of the search engines which shows this film passes WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. There is a film by this name which came out in 2015, but it is not this film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Assassin (2015 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Assassin (2015 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassin (2015 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dennis P. Tarnow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dennis P. Tarnow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis P. Tarnow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ninja lanternshark has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, DRosenbach. Ninja lanternshark, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 02:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nicolas Muzin

added links pointing to Attorney, Republican, Henry Brown and Washington Heights

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Evan Hoffman listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Evan Hoffman. Since you had some involvement with the Evan Hoffman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Anne Delong (talk) 17:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BenShapiro.png

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:BenShapiro.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://ktth.com/2014/01/03/ben-shapiro-joins-ktth/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orthodontics

Hi there! I wanted to reach out to someone in the dental community as I'm one of the dentist editors here on Wikipedia. In past 9 months, I've created 70 or so articles. Majority of them are about Orthodontics and some about dentistry. I'd like to be involved int he Dentistry Project on a bigger scale then just an editor. It seems like majority of the users are not active anymore and there are only few contributors. How can i help make things more organized? (talk) 15:48, 06 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there to you, too, and thanks for reaching out! The dental project is welcomes you -- just add your name to the list on the participants page -- if you would like help with that, please let me know. As far as the organization, it's pretty loose. This is not a school where we assign tasks, and everyone is free to do as they please, and hopefully in a constructive fashion at all times. I'm not involved in any other projects, so I'm not sure how other projects work.

If you'd like to organize your articles better, you might think about creating some templates to place within the articles -- this way, viewers can more readily jump from one to the other within the same category (such as "great innovators in orthodontics") without having to know the names of the individuals off hand. Again, if you'd like help with that, please let me know. It's actually quite simple, and with just a bit of copying and pasting and a little figuring out of the HTML codes, you'll probably figure it out more easily than you initially thought you would, even though at first it might appear daunting.

Again, let me know if you have any other questions. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 00:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ocular bruising from tooth extraction

I was just wondering if you could weigh in on this. Bus stop (talk) 21:51, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Wilcock for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Wilcock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Wilcock (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 02:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DRosenbach. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heshy Fried

Seems he doesn't care about the site anymore. Sad to see what's happened to it in his absence. He really should just shut the thing down but he doesn't want to discuss it at all. No worthwhile content has been posted since he left. 96.232.177.125 (talk) 19:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like to email him yourself, send me an email so I can provide you with his address. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 00:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

His address is actually posted on the site, which it shouldn't be. He still has the message up that he welcomes contact. 96.232.177.125 (talk) 14:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jezzdale0.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jezzdale0.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:53, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:ModiRosenfeld2.png

Thanks for uploading File:ModiRosenfeld2.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ThoughtAudio Review Request

I am seeking independent and neutral viewpoints on the article ThoughtAudio, which is being considered for deletion. If you have a few minutes to review it, I would appreciate your article contributions and opinion on the decision as to whether it merits being retained and improved, or deleted. ThoughtAudio was targeted by the same editor that made a failed attempt to delete the wikiquote article Michael Scott Gallegos. There are only 3 reviews/votes so far. I am hoping that a minority viewpoint as to the worthiness of the article will not prevail. My work is mainly in the creation of new wikiquote articles @ELApro and time is rarely spent in unproductive controversy. I am a long time editor for Wikipedia, but have not created many articles here. I would much appreciate your advice and/or contributions with regard to the process. ELApro (talk) 23:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ModiRosenfeld2.png

A tag has been placed on File:ModiRosenfeld2.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Train2104 (t • c) 19:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So what's up?

I haven't checked up on you in a while. Enigma^msg 05:05, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it has been a while. If you'd like to chat, email me. Thanks! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 12:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:J. K. Amalou

Template:J. K. Amalou has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jørgen Slots for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jørgen Slots is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jørgen Slots until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexbrn (talk) 08:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jan Lindhe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jan Lindhe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Lindhe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexbrn (talk) 19:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jørgen Slots has been accepted

Jørgen Slots, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 21:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stanley Malamed

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stanley Malamed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.amazon.com/Stanley-F.-Malamed/e/B000APW5JE. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:43, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Jorgen Slots - Headshot.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Jorgen Slots - Headshot.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DRosenbach. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Running Room listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Running Room. Since you had some involvement with the Running Room redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

renaming Simi bar Chiya

If I understand correctly the amora is שימי בר חייא so should the title not be Shimi bar Chiya/Hiya/Hiyya? Note he seems to be a student of Rav since it says in Yoma he sat in front of Rav. DGtal (talk) 09:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions are weird, sometimes. Take Mordechai ben David, for example. Why does he pick a transliterated first name but an anglicized secondary? Similar examples exist where one of two names is derived and placed into English in a different way than another. So I suppose it can be Hiya, but there are no conventions on Wikipedia like there are in a formal journal. Articles are written by the person who started them, and even then, there are inconsistencies within articles. So uses of the words shulchan aruch v shulkhan arukh or chai present non-uniform spellings. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 15:58, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya is the minor problem here that can be dealt with through redirects. My question was actually about Simi, wonering why you chose that transliteration, perhaps based on one of the English language translations. DGtal (talk) 22:15, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google it and you'll see that it's Simi, not Shimi. It's a sin, not a shin. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 02:49, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google isn't a very good source for this type of info. I think the most relevant sources are the different translations of the Talmud into English, new and old. I wouldn't be surprised to discover both transliterations exist. DGtal (talk) 09:33, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to tell me that google is not a good source of information. However, if you google and find something meaningful, that's good enough. Google is not a primary source, but a clearinghouse of information. I found something for you, but it was a PDF download, and so couldn't send you a link. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 16:15, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Jorgen Slots - Headshot.JPG

Hello, DRosenbach. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Jorgen Slots - Headshot.JPG — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Stippling SSF.jpg

You uploaded or restored , File:Stippling SSF.jpg, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work, please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

It's okay to remove or strike this message once the issue has been resolved :).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feymanlibrary.JPG

I just nominated File:Feymanlibrary.JPG for deletion over at commons because I don't believe it's free-use enough for Commons. A fair-use argument could be made here, so if you want to re-upload it, or have someone undelete the old version here, that should be fine. I think. I could be wrong on either count.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DRosenbach. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DRosenbach. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inlays and Onlays

I just read most of this article after encountering the unfamiliar word ONLAY in a crossword puzzle. It's a VERY good article, IMHO. I looked at your user page, and I saw why it's such a good article. The details of dentistry are a pretty big mystery to me, though I've had a lot of dental work and am pretty familiar with the world of medicine. I never before thought of looking up dental matters in Wikipedia, but now I've seen the light. Keep up the good work. Lou Sander (talk) 03:55, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lou~

Thanks so much for your kind comments!

It's people like you who make the world a nicer place. :)

~dale

Proposed deletion of Mack Meller

The article Mack Meller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No RS coverage (closest is Columbia University magazine, where he's a student).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 19:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ardengarden.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ardengarden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yeshiva V'Kollel Beis Moshe Chaim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howard Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

encyclopedic style

I want to express my appreciation for your work in dealing with this field, where so many of the earlier articles were essentially advertising. But while checking Gingival grafting, I noticed that some parts of it did not have a formal tone. Usually you are careful not to address the patient directly, for example, "using your own blood ", should be "using the patient's own blood". I also noticed that several papers or mentions of individuals did not have an attached reference, or were in the form ((Kennedy and Dorfman et al.) , but thee were no papers by them in the references. I don'; mean to pick on details , but your work is considered an example for others working on the subject. DGG ( talk ) 22:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no...by all means!

But I did not write the article. All I did so far was redirect because there was some confusion and lack of clarity between gingival graft and gingival grafting.

Thanks! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 23:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everyone Loves Mel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Green (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Cmacphoto.jpg

The file File:Cmacphoto.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gingival sulcus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enamel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lisa Piccirillo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matis Weinberg

The article Matis Weinberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person. All references related to one long ago scandalous and unverified event (WP:BLP1E applies).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jehochman ^Talk 13:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Polk E. Akers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polk E. Akers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polk E. Akers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnmgKing (talk) 20:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matis Weinberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genesis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Matis Weinberg. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jehochman ^Talk 17:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This information is quite well referenced and your involvement here is suspect. Please do not delete well referenced material or you will be blocked. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 17:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why is my involvement suspect? Because I disagree with you or something else? Jehochman ^Talk 17:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to have this discussion in two places, but it's because you claim that reputable sources such as the YU Commentator and The Jewish Week and The Jewish Journal and JTA are unreliable. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 17:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GC?

What is GC in your edit? Please ping me. Eric Kvaalen (talk) 08:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry -- what do you mean by your question? Did I write GC somewhere? DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 23:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Breathless (2012 film)

added links pointing to Unconscious, Daisy, Crime scene investigation and Gunpoint

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for assistance

Dear Dr. Rosenbach,

I am currently working on Messiah in Judaism and I saw your contributions to Maimonides. I believe you have both language and technical skills to assist in this project.

Blessings,

Yaakov W. Yaakov Wa. (talk) 04:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. A Kosher and Happy Pesach!

Sure... what's up? DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 16:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dr. Rosenbach,

Can you please take a look at talk page of Messiah in Judaism and offer your honest opinion in section Effects of Messiah. Thanks so much!

Blessings,

Yaakov W. Yaakov Wa. (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"John W. Riggs" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect John W. Riggs. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 13#John W. Riggs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TipsyElephant (talk) 14:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Samuel Bliss Cooper

The article Samuel Bliss Cooper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KH-1 (talk) 06:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ardengarden.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ardengarden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anna Kooiman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bucket list.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TexasDentalBranch2.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TexasDentalBranch2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Web of Lies

The article Web of Lies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:47, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help with newly translated article

Hi DRosenbach, you kindly helped me with the article that I translated about Rabbi Dr. Avraham Steinberg. I have just translated a new article for a client, Rabbi Menachem Bombach. Would you be interested in looking over it and seeing if you think it is ready to move to Main Space? User:TikshoretSM/Menachem Bombach By the way, I really appreciated your page about Rabbi Isaac Bernstein z"l. My husband and I were really close with him and recorded his shiurim for posterity. Thank you so much, I really appreciate your help! --TikshoretSM (talk) 09:54, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey~

This looks great! Can you access a better pic of him -- this one's nice, but it cuts off the top of his head. Thanks! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 15:48, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

usanewscourt.com as a reference

Hi DRosenbach . I noticed that you used usanewscourt.com as a source in Gina Mastrogiacomo. I am unable to find any evidence or discussion indicating that it meets reliable sourcing criteria for such information, the article uses Wikipedia as a reference. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 23:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Passover!

Happy Passover!

Hello DRosenbach, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this passover. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a happy passover or easter, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Happy editing,
𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 12:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Happy Passover}} to other user talk pages.

𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 12:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cost Plus Drugs page sourcing

Just here to let you know that I've tagged your article on Cost Plus for reliance on primary sources and left a note in its talk page. Honestly I couldn't find any better sources than you did but it does read somewhat soapy and someone left an advert template a few days ago as well. Best — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.179.12.188 (talk) 05:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:M+binthehouse.jpg

The file File:M+binthehouse.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:35, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:M+tonthebus.jpg

The file File:M+tonthebus.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:35, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eliezer Waldenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alex Picture 2 copy 2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alex Picture 2 copy 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -M.nelson (talk) 11:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gina Mastrogiacomo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gina Mastrogiacomo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Mastrogiacomo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CapnZapp (talk) 21:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Magical creatures in Harry Potter, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Boa and Python.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arden's Garden

The article Arden's Garden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable business

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 20:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Erick Morikawa

The article Erick Morikawa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreliable source in a BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Billytanghh (talk) 01:08, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erick Morikawa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erick Morikawa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erick Morikawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Billytanghh (talk) 13:06, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Baruch Simon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Baruch Simon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. QuicoleJR (talk) 02:46, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of M. J. Rosenberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. J. Rosenberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. J. Rosenberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Longhornsg (talk) 04:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Alissa Thomas-Newborn.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Alissa Thomas-Newborn.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://web.archive.org/web/20210306134836/https://www.yeshivatmaharat.org/scholar/thomas-newborn/alissa. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Ирука¹³ 02:47, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Sun

Hello, I noticed that you created the Justin Sun article on 4 June 2019. Could you kindly disclose whether there are any conflicts of interest (COI) or if you were paid to create the article? Additionally, I'm interested in understanding the original intention behind writing it. Thank you! Maklermak (talk) 21:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maklermak~

I was not contacted by anyone to write this article and I have neither met nor been in contact with Justin or his representatives. I actually did not at all remember starting his article or even who he was...I needed to read his article, and I still don't know who he is. Why did I start the article? Probably because I had read a news article about BitTorrent. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 20:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DRosenbach. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Could ye kindly let us know if ye've been contacted off or on Wiki to make edits to the Justin Sun article, just so we're all above board here? Maklermak (talk) 13:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I don't know why you're asking me this -- was there something suspicious? I've started many articles just on a whim because I've found a news article about the subject and there had been no Wikipedia article yet about someone I deemed notable in their field. I was not advertising, I was not contacted by anyone in regard to the Justin Sun article (you are the first to reach out to me, actually) and I am not related to him in any way. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 20:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Maklermak (talk) 12:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]