User talk:DferDaisy

DferDaisy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DferDaisy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi DferDaisy! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:55, Saturday, January 14, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine Wikiproject!

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia from Wikiproject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:

Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically requires recent secondary sources to support information; its application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, edit, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss it on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any problems. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi DferDaisy! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 01:18, Saturday, January 21, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hi, DferDaisy, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia! Here are some links that may help you:

The Teahouse, a place to get advice about editing
Manual of Style, which shows you how to write articles
The Five Pillars, features which all articles should have

You may also be interested in WikiProject Equine, which writes and improves articles about horses, horse sports (including the Olympic disciplines), horse care and training, or WikiProject Horse racing, which focuses on horse races, racehorses, and jockeys. Please remember to sign your talk page posts with four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your username and the date. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. And again, welcome! Montanabw^(talk) 05:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome. I haven't written anything about horse tail protection though; you must have got me confused with someone else. DferDaisy (talk) 02:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops! I copied the template from another user and they had that in there! My apologies! God work on the EIPH article! Montanabw^(talk) 08:15, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you can help?

Can you answer the question here? I didn't know the answer. If you can, thanks! Montanabw^(talk) 22:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invasive species in Mexico article

Okay, I've finally finished the translation! Thanks for working on the citations; if you run into anything in the references that Google Translate can't help you with, feel free to ping me. —2macia22 (talk) 02:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If interested

In your wonderful article improvement work, could you addEquine metabolic syndrome to your cleanup list? Looks like more new research out there, and it could benefit from explaining the difference between different forms of EMS and how it differs from Cushing’s. (If you have time and motivation, of course). You are doing great work on these veterinary articles! Montanabw^(talk) 21:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words. I'll take a look. DferDaisy (talk) 01:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About Promptov sign

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promtov%27s_sign It is hard to find any english articles about it. Some doctors in post-soviet states rarely still mention this "sign". Google: "Симптом Промптова" Yandex.ru: "Симптом Промптова" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.196.22.245 (talk) 05:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ranks in taxonomy templates

Hi, just to note that in a taxonomy template, like Template:Taxonomy/Eucoccidiorida and others you created recently, the rank name must be the Latin term. It may appear to work if you use the English name (e.g. "family" instead of "familia"), but not everything will be working correctly behind the scenes. The automated taxobox system as a whole is described at Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system; there's a list of Latin and English rank names at Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system/taxonomy templates#rank. I'm always happy to help with any aspect of automated taxoboxes if you leave me a note on my talk page. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't realize. Thanks for letting me know. DferDaisy (talk) 21:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Redirect Barnstar
		Your diligent work in the area of redirect categorization and improvement is duly recognized and greatly appreciated. You are truly one of the unsung heroes of Wikipedia, and we hope you continue to enjoy your improvement of this awesome encyclopedia! For your help with ISO 4 redirects! Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So happy

This edit was just great. Great sources, neutral writing, correcting bad inaccurate stuff. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 19:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Puppies are dogs.

Hi. I just started a discussion at talk:Bearded Collie because someone reverted my edit of the redundancy of "puppies and dogs" to the simply inclusive just "dogs." Will you please go there to give us your input, and perhaps revert the reversion? Will you please also have a look at my edit history of all the other cat-and-dog-related edits that I just made and support those corrections too? Thanks! Thayve Sintar (talk) 04:24, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Havers

Could you please re-insert the figure from Havers's book. It is relevant to his contribution to osteohistology.Kdammers (talk) 08:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you think it is useful, feel free to add it. DferDaisy (talk) 17:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Merging from cat to cat health

Hello, sorry, I didn't notice that there was a discussion about it. I'll try to follow the pages you linked, thanks. Drow (talk) 18:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta

The 2017 Cure Award

In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Moth Week has been accepted

National Moth Week, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 19:45, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Syer Cuming has been accepted

Henry Syer Cuming, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:44, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Lokivetmab) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Lokivetmab, DferDaisy!

Wikipedia editor Ozzie10aaaa just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

the 'type' in the infobox has not been established, thank you

To reply, leave a comment on Ozzie10aaaa's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:31, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now added. Thanks for reviewing it. DferDaisy (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios

Thanks for spotting and removing the copyvio at Sphingomyelin but if you find any more please do us a favour and try and identify the revision in which the copyvio was added; you've a better idea of what text you are looking for than me (despite Lehninger's book or an earlier version being my biochemistry standard textbook in the early 80s). Nthep (talk) 20:11, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check the revisions next time. Thanks for the reminder. DferDaisy (talk) 20:39, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abbreviations

Hi. Thanks for your edit. It would be nice if you could spell out your Edit summaries. For example, I don't know what "ef tidy up. url not required if pmc/doi" means, even though I have BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It means if there is a permanent identifier like pmc (PubMed Central) id or doi (Digital object identifier) then url is not required, as the permanent links prevent link rot. Not sure that really needs writing in full? If I wrote "ef", I missed the r of "ref", which means reference. DferDaisy (talk) 21:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leviathan

I saw what you did over at Leviathan, shortening the URL's. If you don't mind my asking, is there some specific automated method or technique for that kind of thing, or is it just something one has to learn by trial and error? Alephb (talk) 02:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alephb: The underlying principles are here: WP:BOOKLINKS. So for this link to page 76: https://books.google.com/books?id=EU7Qt5HSmHAC&pg=PA76 the id of the book is EU7Qt5HSmHAC and the part of the url which links to the page is &pg=PA then the page number is at the end. You don't need anything else after the page number. It don't know if there's a bot that figures this out. DferDaisy (talk) 23:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That should work out just fine. Thanks. Alephb (talk) 23:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Solanum arboreum has been accepted

Solanum arboreum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great work on stale drafts! Theroadislong (talk) 17:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saccharomyces chevalieri has been accepted

Saccharomyces chevalieri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nessie (talk) 02:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, DferDaisy. You have new messages at Danger's talk page.
Message added 19:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Danger ^{High voltage!} 19:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neolithodes has been accepted

Neolithodes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gasterophilus intestinalis has been accepted

Gasterophilus intestinalis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Million Degrees has been accepted

A Million Degrees, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hitro talk 09:54, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove access dates

Please do not remove access dates. They are very good for identifying the author of the specific section. If I see that a source was accessed the 23rd of August 2011 it's very easy to look for edits from that day. Your argument is null that they are uncessary when using ISBN is void, because that also applies to DOIs, but when citing scientific papers it is routine to add date of access regardless. Carl Fredrik^talk 01:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

The 2018 Cure Award

In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beth Lesser (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beth Lesser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Beth Lesser, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv🍁 15:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of the works of the atelier of the Maître de Tronoën. listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Listing of the works of the atelier of the Maître de Tronoën.. Since you had some involvement with the Listing of the works of the atelier of the Maître de Tronoën. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Articles containing Mara-language text has been nominated for discussion

Category:Articles containing Mara-language text, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —hike395 (talk) 09:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My request to have the List of infectious sheep and goat diseases page reassessed

Hi DferDaisy,

I'm seeking to have the List of infectious sheep and goat diseases page "reassessed" from stub-class by WikiProject Veterinary medicine. I'm notifying you because I see you have made a number of good edits in the last few years (and thanks for that!), whereas the page has not been formally assessed since 2010, immediately after it was created by user Kleopatra. At that time it was obviously classed as a "Stub", but not so now.

I added the page to the to-be-assessed list here.

- Eldon Rosenberg (talk) 21:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Eldon Rosenberg: Hi, it looks like it should be classed as a list, per criteria for list, rather than classified as stub/start etc. I reassessed it as a list. DferDaisy (talk) 23:16, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DferDaisy: Thanks, I think that's useful. Apologies for the newbie question, but is there any official WikiProject mechanism you know of to have it assessed as to its completeness or reliability in a way that is meaningful to Wikipedia users? Eldon Rosenberg (talk) 02:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Eldon Rosenberg: Featured content are articles which have gone through a review process. I haven't been involved in creating or reviewing featured content, so I can only give you general advice. The criteria for a featured list are here; List of skin conditions looks like the only list of diseases which is a featured list, so reviewing that may be helpful. DferDaisy (talk) 19:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for József Marek

On 26 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article József Marek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hungarian veterinarian József Marek, the first to identify Marek's disease, also developed a remedy for liver fluke in cattle and a nasogastric tube for treating horse colic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/József Marek. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, József Marek), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Beth Lesser

Hello, DferDaisy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beth Lesser".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1951 in spaceflight

Hello! I see that, on 21:27, 21 September 2019‎, you changed 1951 in spaceflight, removing the string of identical July 1 R-2 missions. Those appear on Mark Wade's [R-2] page, though not on his [1951 Chronology] page (which is incomplete, by the way).

Did you have another reference you used to make the fix? Thanks! :) --Neopeius (talk) 18:44, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That was over a year ago, so I don't remember now. Please edit it as you see fit. DferDaisy (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Miller's Anatomy of the Dog

On 13 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Miller's Anatomy of the Dog, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Miller's Anatomy of the Dog, a textbook dedicated to canines, was found by a specialist feline publication to be bereft of information about cats? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Miller's Anatomy of the Dog), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Grace Meigs Crowder

Hello! Your submission of Grace Meigs Crowder at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mind matrix 22:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Grace Meigs Crowder

On 10 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grace Meigs Crowder, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Grace Meigs Crowder found that pregnancy and childbirth were a common cause of death in the early 1900s for American women who were aged under 45? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grace Meigs Crowder. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Grace Meigs Crowder), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Why did you remove my link to an article featuring Dr. Billinghurst talking specifically on the topic of the Raw feeding BARF diet. There are many helpful pieces as well as a specific video shot by Dr. Billinghurst to help people understand more about raw feeding.Jaystee97 (talk) 21:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Equine protozoal myeloencephalitis

Hi, in this edit you added an unsourced claim ( Most horses infected with S. neurona do not exhibit neurological symptoms consistent with EPM. ). Could you please provide a source? Thanks! Wuerzele (talk) 01:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pet insurance has been nominated for renaming

Category:Pet insurance has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 12:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]