User talk:E. Sn0 =31337=/Archive 2

==Beretta Cx4 Storm==

Hail and well met. Yea, I don't understand why these people don't add "uses in crime" sections to every article on cars, screwdrivers, sticks, crowbars, hammers, rocks, or any other object that humans have been using to make one another miserable for the last 10,000 years. Why are some people so terrified of the idea of private firearms ownership? Crazy people happen. The more humans you stuff into crowded urban conglomerations, the more crazy folks there will be. There were probably several points in that poor, young man's life where he could have been redirected from his tragic fate. That ship has sailed and the loss diminishes us all. To demonize a tool and glorify a crime to promote a political agenda that sees one's fellow citizens as criminal, dim-witted, and untrustworthy unless they happen to work for the state is just wrong. Gotta go make groceries. Cheers. L0b0t 16:58, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you as well, L0b0t. I believe the biggest problem with gun crime in crowded inner cities is directly caused by the War on Drugs. Gun control will not work with or without the Drug War in place. Take away the black market for drugs by legalizing them and setting their prices low enough to put the dealers out of business instead of arresting or shooting them, and the crime problem will go away. Treat abusers (note I do not say users) as patients instead of criminals to be caged up, and the health problems will be minimized. Keep in mind some drugs have a wide gap between use and abuse, such as marijuana; while others have a very short one, like crack cocaine. The way to deal with the narrow-gap drugs is to make it okay to use wide-gap drugs. Legalizing marijuana will accomplish this. It will also have a similar impact on alcohol consumption. From personal experience, marijuana makes one want to put away the guns and make peace, while other drugs have no or the opposite effect. E. Sn0 =31337= 22:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please block Whitgift School forever

I pledge you to go the bottom of User_talk:212.85.5.92, and there see the penultimate entry from me, in responce to your comment

Please may you reply to that page, and PLEASE, if you may on my User talk User_talk:BhaveerWith thanks, Bhaveer 19:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The compromise is perfectly acceptable. Accounts I have no problem with as it is anyway. E. Sn0 =31337= 21:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patroller Mistakes Notice

I borrowed your noticebox and installed it on my talk page. If you object to this, I'll be happy to redact it. Thank you. E. Sn0 =31337= 16:28, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; I actually just put it up this morning. And I like the "thank you for your patience" bit at the end; I think I'll steal that in turn. :-D -Patstuart^{(talk)(contribs)} 18:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, excellent! Thanks! E. Sn0 =31337= 18:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

just a note

Regarding this edit summary, I suggest DNFT as it just gives them something to get excited about. - Banyan Tree 18:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just hate spammers with a passion. Plus, getting them excited is perversely a good thing. Gets 'em blocked quicker. E. Sn0 =31337= 19:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the assist

^_^ Danny Lilithborne 03:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spammer

I'd rather not block 64,000 IP addresses for longer than 3 hours or so, and this has been going on for most of the day (by the looks of it, anyway). It's probably better to just protect the articles being spammed. Which ones do you need protected? -- Steel 21:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ack, by the way. It's a Polish DSL provider, depending on its market share a range block might block half of Poland. Femto 11:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent idea; the articles bittorrent, peer-to-peer, azureus, bittorrent client, emule, and bittorrent tracker. Thank you. E. Sn0 =31337= 22:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: I think internet need sprotect as well due to being linked on Slashdot; see its talk page. E. Sn0 =31337= 22:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've protected the first two and Internet. The others I've just watchlisted (and will keep an eye on) because they haven't been hit much. -- Steel 23:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. Thank you for your time. P.S. what's the procedure to award a barnstar? I want to give you one :) E. Sn0 =31337= 23:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:BARN. In the meantime, I need sleep. -- Steel 23:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ah hell, I spotted another one! Sorry! E. Sn0 =31337= 23:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've protected one, watchlisted the other. -- Steel 17:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roger that, thank you. E. Sn0 =31337= 17:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This spammer is persistent enough to be blacklisted. I have proposed torrentmania.info at m:Talk:Spam blacklist. You may add more evidence there if you want, though the case seems clear enough. Femto 11:33, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and, do you already know Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam and its talk page? You look like you could feel right at home there. Femto 12:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Rcmistakes" userbox

I just noticed the wacky stuff that happened with your name when used with my userbox. Sorry about that! I've fixed it now. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you! I was wondering how to fix that! E. Sn0 =31337= 21:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT Wikiproject?

Does anything of the nature exist? I thought you might know, and would like to join if possible. Oh, might you copy your response to my talk page? I'd hate to miss it. -FateSmiled&DestinyLaughed

I don't know. Is there a Canonical List of Wikiprojects™ or anything? E. Sn0 =31337= 18:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...

Umm ok all i said i dont wanna know about "butsex" if you wanna know about else where google it or something... --EliteMike 19:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First off, watch where you sign your posts. You accidentally damaged one of my talk page subheaders. Secondly, and more importanyly, your POV is one of prejudice and hate due apparently to a simple 'ick factor'. Get over it. There are things in this world which will disgust anyone, yet only the most loudmouthed Fundies and other bluenose censors call for its banning or deliberate loss of knowledge. These people have very few friends, and for good reason. They want us thrown back to an Age of Innocence that never existed anywhere but in their own minds. That kind of simple-minded unilateralist idealism is very similar to that afflicting the President of my country, with the result that five hundred thousand people were killed by it. Remember, the Holocaust started with a mere idea that something which isn't harmful in itself should be violently eliminated due to PERCEIVED harm that really didn't exist! E. Sn0 =31337= 19:32, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

uh what does that have to do with anything?--EliteMike 19:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This conversation is going to go nowhere. Let's all move on. -- Steel 19:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea Steel; this boy has no intention of ever learning to think outside his own extremely restrictive box. Oh well, glad it's not I who builds his own mental prison with religion, but I'll be DAMNED if he thinks he can enforce his worldview on us, particularly one he shows is broken! E. Sn0 =31337= 19:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm hi...--EliteMike 03:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:AntiVandalBot

The change of VandalKiller to Vandalfucker was obvious vandalism. If you trace it back far enough you'll see where the vandalism happened. Please do not change it back to a vandalised version. Mkdw ^talk 22:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I thought it was funny enough in the 'Barnstar EATEN BY A BEAR' sense to be an actual award. E. Sn0 =31337= 22:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User Talk:86.8.39.216

Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.39.216 (talk • contribs)

No problem. :) E. Sn0 =31337= 20:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Compliment

Hi, after taking a quick look at your user page, I've just gotta say that you're one of the most awesome people I've ever seen on WP. And it seems we have similar opinions on just how screwed up wikipedia can be.

)Mk623SC20K 03:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!

E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

User talk:75.35.254.173

Every reference to everything that Thearrel 'Kiltron' McKinney has done in his professional gaming career has been deleted from Wikipedia. This is not legit editing. I smell sabotage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.35.254.173 (talk • contribs)

All I did was revert your personal attack on Wikethewok, then rv linkspam from the HMFAKK2 article, and respond to your post here. I have no idea what you're talking about. E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} 21:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HaHa

The reason I said that about Wikitruth is that its true. I mean, whoever seriously edits there has no life. --66.218.11.61 06:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does it look like I give a flying *BLOOOOOOOOOOP!!!*? Your personal attack is unwarranted AND a lie in one. You lose. E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} 07:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey thanks for rv-ing the vandalism to my user page. :-) Wickethewok 02:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Any time, bro. I wanted to toy with him and work him into a towering rage, but it appears I won't need to. Have a wonderful day. E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} 02:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guess who...

=D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phantasee (talk • contribs)

Oh excellent! You're on Wiki too? K3wl!
- I suppose so. --Phant 05:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Amburgers and W00tbeer! |||||| E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} 05:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war over Bugatti? Irony gold

What, the guy thinks if he leaves a nice note, we'll let him vandalize? These people crack me up. --Elaragirl ||||||^Talk|Count 05:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah they make me LOL too. I hope you don't mind if I borrowed your |||||| 'flag' thingy :) |||||| E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} 05:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Borrowed Your Userboxes

I hope you don't mind, but I borrowed your anti-anon (registration required for edits) userbox and your anti gun control user box. BTW, I also live in SA. Do you know where I can pick up a user box that is anti "marriage = 1 man + 1 woman"? Also I agree with your comments about WikiPedia bro, but think about it .... racists, homophobes, and dumb asses have taken their POVs into cyberspace. That's where we need to be too. WP is a major battlefield right now and WP has given us the tools to counter attack (albeit passively) and put these guys on the defensive. If we do it right, we can win quite a few battles and pave the way for others. Thanks —Chicaneo 08:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Borrow as many userboxen as you want. I don't know about how to go about finding that userbox you want, but I believe it exists. As for my WP comments, there does appear to be a bit of a cabal within the Admins group. My friend Alyeska has been the target of a witch hunt recently by this 'cabal'. That's what caused my comments about WP. Racists, homophobes, and assholes most certainly do not have the high ground on the Internet, as evidenced by this last election (Youtube, anyone?). Wikipedia's a good tool for attacking these fools, but we have whole arsenals where they have maybe only IMs, crackpot forums, and email. We are winning battles every day; now all we need to do is render those we lose redundant. |||||| E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} 20:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly! I'm sorry to hear about your friend being victimized. Hope he doesn't give in or give up. Say, could you help me out with a little battle of my own? I am trying to have the Elvira Arellano article deleted. The article is about a very recent news topic about Elvira Arellano, an illegal immigrant, who is hiding out in an effort to not be deported. It is being used on the illegal immigrant site to support arguments as to why illegal immigration is "bad" and illegals are "bad people". Now, illegal immigration is a big problem, but from my standpoint, if every illegal who tried to outrun the law got their own article, then WP would be overrun with articles about fugitive illegals. This kind of shit is made for TV - -America's Most Wanted maybe. The read between the lines issue is that an agenda of hate is being promoted here, and it is accomplished by inundating WP with negative articles about the target of the month. This month it's illegals and Mexican-Americans, next month it might be Jews, the next month gays & lesbians, and so on. We can not allow that agenda to move forward in cyberspace. So what I am asking is that you take a look at the Elvira Arellano article, and if you agree, could you please click on the link at the top of the page to vote this article out based on the fact that it is not notable. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Thanks, –Chicaneo 20:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Something great has happened. A group of users has taken the Elvira Arellano article and turned it into a big civil rights issue. They've cleaned up the article and are promoting this lady's cause instead of letting her be a scape goat for hatred!!! WOW - I suppose if I asked you to vote now it would be to keep the article. Thanks, Chicaneo 20:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah crap, I already voted... |||||| E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} 21:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, shit happens! Thanks anyway - Chicaneo 02:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Your work reverting vandalism is greatly appreciated, but please don't make personal attacks in the edit summaries. It's against Wikipedia policy. This essay tries to explain why it's a bad idea. TomTheHand 02:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second Tom's comments. In fact, I came here to say the same thing and saw that Tom had beaten me to it. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

I was checking into a common vandal's contributions history, and saw that he's been at it again lately; since you left a couple of warnings on his talk page I thought you might want to follow up and possibly get his IP blocked (I'm still a little fuzzy on how that's done). His contribs page is http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=24.61.43.50. Thanks for your patrol work. --WikkiTikkiTavi 02:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to, but I'm not an Admin. |||||| E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} 02:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for the quick revert of the vandalism to my user page. I do appreciate it. --JFreeman ^(talk) 00:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any time. I hate childish asshats who do that. |||||| E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} 00:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for mine, too. Hope you're enjoying my pride flag. --Elar a girl^Talk|Count 02:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me as well. It's always fun when new users decide to share. - Banyan Tree 03:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO! Yup! |||||| E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} 03:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject LGBT studies

Hello! I noticed that your userpage mentions that you are interested in LGBT issues. Would you be interested in joining WikiProject LGBT studies? The WikiProject's been a bit inactive recently and some of us are trying to get it going again. We'd love to have you on board! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 21:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds fun. I'd likely specialize in keeping vandalism off LGBT articles and prosecuting (not literally, just making life difficult for) vandals who attack them. :) |||||| E. Sn0 =31337= ^{Talk to me :D} 21:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]